Talk:1983: Doomsday

Before you start editing, please read the Editorial Guidelines.

Discussion Archives: | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 |

Former Proposals: | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 |

GENERAL DISCUSSION
The following is for general discussion to improve the TL that does not involve article proposals.

Religion
Hi all, don't contribute alot to discussions...hence I make a lot of mistakes. I've noticed that religion has not been a point of discussion in the TL and wondered what people thought? I've posted a proposal on the and Catholic Church, I'll also expand on a religious stub for the, but would really like to see something on other christians, buddhism, Islam and indigenous religions of Australia 22 September 200 9 15:38 Mjdoch

I brought up religion and foreign embassies a month or so ago, no one focused on it much. Mr.Xeight 17:22, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

I would see a rise in atheism in the areas less affected, and a rise in religion in those more affected. From a "If there was a god he wouldn't let this happen" kind of opinion, but in the more affected areas, religion is all the people would have left.--Oerwinde 20:33, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

Movies
whith Hollywood/Vinewood gone how will the film industry develop--Owen1983 16:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Please try to follow the right format when adding new topics. That being said, Australian and South American movies would come to dominate the world film market but it would be a while after DD before they reach a world wide market.  Mitro 16:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * What, no Bollywood? Louisiannan 22:44, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I think India needs to focus more on its mutinous warlords first. Mr.Xeight 00:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Whatever dude, but Bollywood would still exist, I am not a fan though. Despite the warlords, it'll be there, I am Indian so I know more about this stuff. Obviously, Bollywood will emerge as the world leader in film industry, it is next to Hollywood anyways. MC Prank 16:40, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * You know India *here*, Prank. You don't necessarily know what Xi'Reney and the others have understood India to be following Doomsday.  I think that Mr. Xeight may be closer to the truth of the matter -- Bollywood as it is today may be some ways off yet. Louisiannan 17:34, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Louis is right. It has only been since 2003 that  has received a stable government (the UIP) in the post-Doomsday world, but that was shortlived and the rump UIP has only tenous control at best.  Such an atmosphere is not conducive to a major movie industry in any country.
 * Furthermore India's nuclear weapons are still unaccounted for in this TL. Which warlords have them?  Have they ever used them?  Could Bombay/Mumbai being a radioactice crater, a target of a Delhi warlord?  I still think any movie industry will be farther south in South America or Australia/New Zealand.  Both are part of the "first world" in this TL and thus have more time and money to spend on entertainment then war-torn (potentially radioactive) India.  Mitro 18:09, September 3, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah alright, whatever, but man I didnt think that this idea of India being divided into warlordships and breakaway states is plausible. First of all, in 1983, one party, Congress ruled almost all the states, i.e. they won elections in all the states. Though the constituion of India, made it more or less a federal country but before 1990s, India was practically a unitary state. The Central Govt. (i.e.Federal Govt) had strict control over the states. Moreover, guess what, Indira Gandhi, the most authoritarian & pro-unitary Prime Minister the country ever had, was in office on 26 Sept. 1983. Anyways, now that you have done this, I'm telling you, warlords cant have nukes. There are no nukes assembled, the nuclear core is kept separate and the fission device separate. No single warlord can have it alone. There would be, at most a dirty bomb. Although if warlords collaborated, they could have proper nukes. MC Prank 15:50, September 4, 2009 (UTC)
 * The early 1980s wasn’t exactly a period of peaceful unity for India. There was the rise of insurgents in Punjab; violence in Assam between native villagers, refugees from Bangladesh and other Indians; tensions with the Sikhs after Operation Bluestar; abuse of civil liberties; and hell Indira Gandhi would be assassinated by her own Sikh bodyguards in 1984 touching off the death of over 3000 Sikhs.


 * Factor in the current events and it is not exactly that hard to believe that India would collapse after Doomsday. Though not directly targeted, they would suffer all the effects of the radiation clouds engulfing the northern hemisphere.  Radiation poisoning would kill many people and seriously effect the food production of India leading to famine and violence as people tried to get food to feed their families.  The loss of the large economies of the US, Europe, USSR, China and Japan would also cause India’s economy to take a nose dive and lead a significant percentage of the population being unemployed.  It wouldn’t be difficult to predict that some secessionists or power-hungry generals would take the opportunity to assert some control over their specific areas.


 * Maybe you are correct about India’s nuclear weapons (I will have to look it up), but it doesn’t seem like it would be difficult to get the specific parts and rebuild the weapon. Mitro 16:10, September 4, 2009 (UTC)

It is not maybe, I am correct about India's nukes, and as for the Indian ballistic missiles, they were not fully developed yet. 2-3 or more warlords would have to collaborate together could have proper nukes though. Getting nuclear weapons wont be very difficult, but it wont be easy either. Also, the Emergency was imposed in 1977 not in 1983. Its Operation Bluestar that takes place in 1983 MC Prank 05:06, September 5, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm assuming the Indian air force had bombers that could also deliver the weapons. Also all of the events I refereed to happened roughly between 1980 and 1984 and are meant to show that the Indian political scene was unstable enough during the early 80s that the political, economic, and environmental implications of Doomsday could splinter the country.  I never mentioned the Emergency which lasted from 1975 to 1977, I'm not sure why you brought it up though I apologize if I accidentally referred to something that happened back then.  Blue Star also took place in June 1984, not in 1983.  Mitro 21:27, September 7, 2009 (UTC)

Okay I'm confused. How did a discussion of the Post-Doomsday film idustry turn to the totally unrelated subject of nuclear weaponry? Can we go back to discussing what the Post-Doomsday filmakers would put on the silver screen. Obviously not anything like The Terminator, because the film's future is too much like this timeline's present. --Yankovic270 22:09, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

Well, there could be both optimistic & pessimistic alternate history films, one with a failure in the Cuban Missile Crisis and one in which DD never happened. Talking about Sci-Fi, what about some movies with an A.I. force trying to take on the dismantled and nuclear war-torn humanity. -- MC Prank 14:07, September 18, 2009 (UTC)


 * Alternate history films aren't that popular, really. I don't see why they'd become popular in this timeline. Superhero films, however, would probably exist. Romances will probably always exist. --DarthEinstein 16:02, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

How about a sci-fi film where a guy fom "our" universe got transported to the 1983: Doomsday universe, where he has to stop an evil plot orchestrated by a fictional group of Neo-Nazis in Argentina to take over and establish a "fourth reich" in South America. The Neo-Nazi leader could be based on Josef Mengele, Klaus Barbie or any of the other Nazis who escaped to South America. Or He could be an entirely fictional character like Arnold Toht from Indiana Jones or Deathshead from the Wolfenstein video games. When I say "like", I mean "similar to" and not completely copying. --Yankovic270 20:04, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

Hello? Is anyone there? Anyone? --Yankovic270 12:55, September 23, 2009 (UTC)


 * About your idea above: I would try to stay away from anything involving "our" universe. The rest of it looks fine, though, because in movies the most crazy things can happen. --DarthEinstein 13:09, September 23, 2009 (UTC)

By "our", I mean what the people in the 1983: Doomsday universe imagine our universe to be. Either that or the guy is from a near to far distant future of the Doomsday timeline. When the effects of Doomsday (ie Radiation) have finally vanished. --Yankovic270 16:33, September 23, 2009 (UTC)

"Dust" of USA
In 1983 the US had a population of around 230,000,000 and had maybe thousands of nuclears weapons rain down from the sky onto their hapless soil. How big was the attack? How many people died? How many survived 1983? In order for a natural evolution of the population of the bombed-out remains of the US, how many people should survive and how many people should each splinter-nation have in its boundaries? Am I correct when I say Superior has 6,000,000 citizens? What about the other nations within the former United States? You can count it, I however question it.Fero 04:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Superior has that many citizens specifically because it receives refugees from both the US and Canada. At the same time, abortion has been discouraged in recent years in the Republic, resulting in a nice baby boom. Lahbas 13:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)


 * we have a lot of "countries" in the Canada-USA frontier, some of them are weird, but i think we need a place to the arround 6 millions peoples ive in southwest of USA, Gulf of Mexico states, "black states" (i must not use the N word because is nasty in english), what all that people do where they go, where they stay, what is not destroyed in that zone CSA region need a living town--Fero 02:21, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


 * That's true, though I don't know much about the region. Though, maybe there could be a nation called "Aztlan", named after the mythological Aztec homeland. Or maybe an Apache country. DarthEinstein 02:33, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


 * we dont need aztlan, we have not nuked Mexico, i am talking about Texas, Florida an the land betwine them, there is nothing aztec--Fero 03:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, race issues will certainly heat up again in the South, after having only been settled in the last couple of years, and there will likely be “white” and “black” nations dotting the landscape, no one big nation like there is in the North. Texas is a wasteland, having been a major population center, as well as being a supplier of US oil. Florida would suffer a similar fate, but mostly on the southern tip. The Deep South is what would largely escaped unscathed, except for major cities like Birmingham and Atlanta. I’ve largely finished Superior, so I may take up a drafting of the region sometime this week and present a format. Lahbas 03:17, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I think groups like the Klan would be easily able to sieze power in the unaffected parts of the South. I see a considerable portion of western Texas not even being touched by nukes and also parts of New Mexico and Arizona. A fascist state in this part is very much plausible. What about the White Republic of America or something like that? User_talk:MC_Prank


 * I think Texas will be largely on its own, though, given that to get to the more "ripe" prospects to the west there are large deserts, whereas there's much arable and usable land to the north and east that will likely draw Texan attention more than the blasted deserts of the west.


 * Speaking of which...whoo-boy, what a mess Phoenix and Santa Fe would be! Louisiannan 18:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

What if we have a citystate in the midwest lead by a former criminal? And could have people used the underground facilities of Alcatraz as a bomb shelter? If so I can see a small amount of people scratching out a primitive existance on the island. They could use Peruvian terrace farming techinques and hardy crop varieties. --Yankovic270 21:22, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

And since Alcatraz Island has had tours since it was closed 20 years pre-DD, it is plausible that the people surviving are tourists who were allready on the island. Also another factor that makes it plausible as a impromptu bomb shelter is the network of tunnels that the island hosts. The Civil War fort under the prison could be turned into a bomb shelter. And potentially the wind patterns could have blown the fallout/radiation away from the island. --Yankovic270 21:41, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

Is everyone speechless because of how good the idea is? --Yankovic270 20:13, September 23, 2009 (UTC)


 * Hmmm... a nation of tourists on Alcatraz? I kind of like the idea. Also, if you want to get the attention of people, try making proposal pages for these ideas. --DarthEinstein 21:53, September 23, 2009 (UTC)

I'll create it with the way I usually do it. By inserting it on the Domsday Nation page. And the creating it after. --Yankovic270 14:11, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * I know its not entirely accurate, but http://www.carloslabs.com/node/20 shows that a bomb targeted on San Fran, would leave Alcatraz in the shock zone of the bomb destroying any quake proof buildings on the island.(based on the Ivy Mike 10.5 mt bomb simulation, as the common bombs during the cold war were 7-10 mt.)--Oerwinde 08:01, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

And I might place the Republic of Lincoln in Lincoln, Nebraska. Was there any atomic impacts near the city/town? --Yankovic270 13:44, September 25, 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks like Omaha would likely be the closest target.--Oerwinde 17:10, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

War!
Moved to: Talk:2009 Saguenay War (1983: Doomsday). Please direct all questions, comments, concerns, etc. about the Saugenay War (or whatever its name will eventually be) there please. Mitro 18:31, September 16, 2009 (UTC)

World Population
I think the total world population for this timeline is way to low. Even in the worst situation I found that the population must be higher. Africa alone has a higher population then the world in this timeline. Assuming only one sixth of the people in Asia survive (which is unrealisticly low) that would give us about 500 million people. Add on South America (about 300 Million) and we have 800 million. If this is true then there would be no one left in North America, Africa, Europe or Oceania.

Obviously that's not the situation. I'm not sure what the total world population would be, but I think it would have to be more than 2 Billion. Ether way wee need to change what we have now.--ShutUpNavi 19:16, September 3, 2009 (UTC)

U agree on 2 billion--Owen83 19:10, September 4, 2009 (UTC)

You have to remember that India was spared nuclear strikes. India's population as of 1983 was 730 million. 800million survivors would mean only 70 million survived outside India.--Oerwinde 08:08, September 14, 2009 (UTC)

Even in India, people would die due to the nuclear fallout from the strikes on China MC Prank 16:54, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * I figured the Himalayas would keep most of the fallout out of India. Most of it would get blown onto Vietnam and Cambodia. Even if some of it does hit india, I don't see more than 200 million dying in india, which would still lead 5/8 of the world population in India. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. Indian empire anyone?--Oerwinde 18:35, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * The fallout depends on the size of the bombs that struck. There would be effects on India, but unless there were direct hits, I'll bet that most Indians didn't get any more radiation than a chest x-ray, if that. Louisiannan 22:54, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * Checking some maps of wind patterns in the pacific, it seems that during the colder times of the year, the coastal winds around china would blow down towards indonesia, carrying the fallout more towards there and the phillipines, during warmer times of year it would blow northern, carrying it more towards Korea and Japan.--Oerwinde 08:14, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

Alright here's my view on what the world population would be.

Europe-Likely suffered the worse as it saw a large amount of Nukes used over a small amount of space. Many small nations like Holland and Belgium have been almost completely wiped off the map. Even "Well off" countries like the Celtic Alliance and the Nordic Nations suffered millions of deaths. Also take into account that there might have been large scale immigration from here. I am not an expert on climate, but given how northern the European countries are any change in climate could be devastating. A total European population of only 60 million seems likely.

North America-The US, Cuba, and Canada are gone dropping the continental population by over 300 million. Still Central America and the Caribbean would retain most of there population leaving the continent at around 200 million people.
 * My only problem with this is that Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean (minus Cuba) don't equal even 200 million today. I realize that you are only listing estimates, but considering the climate changes and refugee problem, there populations should have shrunk (at least for  since they are going to have a lot of American refugees).  Plus places like  have been going through and on going civil that would no doubt effect their population.  Mitro 22:15, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

South America-Likely handled the war the best, the population would be around OLT’s 300 million.

Africa-the situation would have been horrible here, but then again it’s not much better OTL. Given increased warfare and lack of foreign aid I can see most African countries loosing around 1 to 3 million people each. Add in decreased birth rates and Africa has about 900 million people left.

Asia-Over half of China is gone, as well as parts of Japan. Still the Indian sub-continent would retain most of its population, even in the event of political collapse, wars, and climate change. Southeast Asia's would drop by a few million thanks to damage spilling over from China. The Middle East and Central Asia remain big question marks as we can’t seem to figure out if they blew up, collapsed, were taken over, or are perfectly fine. Add in the variables and a population would be somewhat over 2 billion.

Oceania-Even if the population increased it would still be too small to really count.

So this would give us a total world population of (and this is only a very rough estimate) closer to three and a half Billion.--ShutUpNavi 13:46, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

Korea
According to the nukes map Korea was not nuked at all! I know the map isn't supposed to be 100% accurate, but I'm just asking whether there was a reason for this, or just an oversight. If the latter we have to figure it out, if the former... we still have to figure it out. --DarthEinstein 02:27, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. I totally agree with you on that Darth. There should be a nation in this impact-free zone. Either it be that Korean gov't in exile on Jeju-do or a (reluctant) union of North and South Korea done for survival's sake rather than anything else. The Federation/Republic of Korea. --Yankovic270 00:09, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

Proposition for the Condition of Asia


East Asia


 * China has reentered the Warlord era, though it has centralized into several major states since its fall in 1983. Republic of China, the only democratically elected government among the Chinese states, is largely recognized as the PRC's successor. East Turkestan, Tibet, and the Socialist Republic of Maio are fighting for independence, while Manchuria is fighting with the Soviet Socialist Republic of Siberia for control of Manchuria. Mongolia has also moved in a taken parts of Inner Mongolia. A remnant of the South Korean government still exists on the island of Jeju-do, while the Ryuku Islands follow a path of independence as a result from being cut-off from Japan.

Middle East


 * Probably the most confusing situation. Israel somewhat expanded into the Sinai, but largely remained in its current territory. Iraq and Iran largely fell apart, Iran from the loss of central cities to Soviet Nuclear weapons, Iraq to the loss of the international oil market. Kurdistan, Assyria, the Socialist Republic of Iraq, and the Islamic Republic of Iraq would be formed in the aftermath. Syria would maintain itself, moving into Lebanon, the Greek Christians taking the remnant and becoming members of the Greek Confederation. The Caliphate of Mecca would be formed along the Red Sea coast, while Palestinian refugees would from the states of Palestine on the East Bank of the Jordan, which would continue to fund terrorism in Israel proper. The League of Nations would also intervene in the area, occupying the location of the former Saudi oil refineries, in order to build up reserves. Baluchistan also has declared independence, and is waging an insurgency campaign against Pakistan.
 * Iran defeated by soviet weapons? why not israeli?Tristanbreiker 17:14, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

Caucasus


 * There really is no explanation needed here. Most ethnic groups were able to earn their independence following the collapse of the central authority from Moscow. The only problem however was that constant warfare began throughout the region as a result. The only area of difficulty is determining the ethnic layout following the nuclear destruction of cities within the region.

Central Asia


 * Again, same problem. Though this is largely the ethnic layout, there is difficulty to determine the effects of the nuclear war upon distribution of the various groups. On a side-note, Tajikistan is split in two by Hazara, while the remainder of land in Afghanistan has since been occupied by the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Other Areas of Note

- Iran - Was not sure what the aftermath government would look like with the loss of central authority, though it could be assumed the situation would devolve into something like China.

- Burma - Considering how many independence movements there are, there could be as many as 100 different countries making up the area.

- Turkey - Was not sure how large Turkey would be, due to the loss of many major cities. Likely would include Anatolia, but just wasn't able to draw a decent, in my mind, realistic border.

- Central China - Again, not sure what would be there. Probably two additional warlord states, but I leave that up to you guys.

- Indochina - Situation could very much become like that of China, especially if Hanoi and Saigon are hit by nuclear weapons. Vietnamese troops were stationed in both Laos and Cambodia, so if the situation did devolve, they would cease to exist as independent states.

Tell me what you think. Lahbas 21:46, September 14, 2009 (UTC)

All right to respond to some of your ideas.


 * East Asia. I like what you have going here a lot. Only thing is that Mongolia would be part of Siberia, though Outer Mongolia might now be part of it.
 * Middle East. Not bad ideas, but I don’t know if I agree with the idea of it being nuked (see what I rote in the M.E section below).
 * Caucasus. I think that is right on the money, nothing to argue with.
 * Central Asia. Can you stay away from here for a little while? I have recently been thinking about re doing the Siberia article to include some of these areas. Other wise I have no problems.
 * Indochina. Even in the most pessimistic situation I can’t see the countries here being nuked by anyone, though fallout and refugees from China however would pose a serious problem. Perhaps South Vietnam becomes independent again because of this.--ShutUpNavi 23:45, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

The Cambodians could rebuild and resettle the old Khemer capitol of Angkor. --Yankovic270 01:35, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

Hello
the editorial giudelines said to introduce yourself here, so so i am! I'm HAD. i didn't have much time to create an account, hence the Rubbish name. i'm new at this, so i apoligize if i have broken any rules or anything!
 * Welcome. I'm looking forward to working with you.  If you have any questions feel free to leave a message on my talk page.  Mitro 13:48, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

Stalled Proposals
The proposal category is starting to get very crowded. Though I'm not asking people to stop creating new proposals, if you do get the opportunity please try to complete any unfinished proposals you may have and nominate them for graduation. If you don't think you can continue working on any of your old proposals then please say so and maybe another editor can pick up the slack and finish it. Hopefully we can shrink both the proposal category and this talk page. Mitro 16:55, September 22, 2009 (UTC)

African Expedition Force
This is an idea that I've had for some time. I had the idea of a group of Masree, Greeks, and Libyans to go through the heart of Africa, to remake contact with nations who haven't seen foreigners since 1983. I was thinking they might start in southern-Egypt and work their way all the way to Cape Town. As for the route, they could go straight down, or around maybe going west to Algeria, Pais del Oro, skirt around the Sahara, down to Kinshasa-Brazazaville, and so forth to Cape Town, going into the east African coast, to Somalia (how friendly would it be?) and right back to Alexandria. What do you guys think? Mr.Xeight 00:43, September 23, 2009 (UTC)

Return
I'm back from a long time away. Whaddidimiss? Benkarnell 13:13, September 26, 2009 (UTC)
 * Welcome back. We got a lot of new faces, a lot of new articles and the war in Saguenay is still going on. Mitro 15:28, September 26, 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, um, that was premature. I'll be out of town and away from my computer for a week... carry on, then.  Benkarnell 11:31, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

Happy Doomsday
26 years ago a nuclear war was averted by the actions of one man. I plan to toast Colonel Stanislav Petrov at 6 pm Central time and I hope you all will join me. Many of us are alive today because of him, plus we got a great POD out of it! Mitro 16:31, September 26, 2009 (UTC)

Cheers at 1 hour and 14 minutes late! Mr.Xeight 00:14, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

WCRB Update
There has been a large number of new contributors as of late, so if there is a "command post" you want to claim please do so and I will add it. If you have no idea what I am talking about, see the bottom of this page or the bottom of the article. Mitro 22:09, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

CURRENT ARTICLE PROPOSALS
Please list any and all current article proposals and their discussion here. If the proposals only involves a specific section of the article, please state that. Also remember to use  when reviewing new articles.

Armed Forces
I'm thinking about creating articles on armies of the ANZC, SAC, Soviet Siberia, Celtic Alliance and other nations. If you ratify it, then there's no problem. MC Prank 08:15, September 12, 2009 (UTC) Well, if there's no America, then there's no Colt, no ArmaLite. No Germany, no Heckler & Koch. I suppose they all will be taken up by mainly Thales Australia. MC Prank 09:34, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

Heckler & Koch might get reserected in Prussia. It is a possibility. Also I did not know that the IRA had American made weaponry. I saw the Armalite rifle on Deadliest Warrior, in perhaps the most contreversial episode of the whole series (IRA vs Taliban) but I never knew the origin. And speaking about the IRA,(if they existed at the time) I am pretty sure the would be satisfied with this situation. Not only is Ireland unified, but is occupping parts of Britain insted of the other way around.

Sig-Saucer of alpine confed are still in buisness? they build guns! Sabb ,PIlatus and embrear build military aircraft.HAD 08:15, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

--Yankovic270 23:26, September 16, 2009 (UTC)

No Mauser or ArmaLite or Colt. I think Thales Australia or Metal Storm will develop this timeline's M4A1. MC Prank 12:18, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

Why develop new guns? why not improved M16's? 2nd point: does any mind if i edit CANZ page for military equipment, famous units, etc?--HAD 12:58, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

i have just editded the CANZ page to give more detail on the armed forces. i hope nobody minds.--HAD 13:22, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

I totally agree with the improvement of "classic" weapons rather than making up new ones. My nation of Virginia uses improved Tommy guns. --Yankovic270 16:16, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

The point is that, if you think strategically, it will sound like common sense that any surviving developed nation would develop new weapons. There'll obviously be a lot of political turmoil in mosty parts of the world, with terror groups and fascists gaining power, they would try to get an edge over there possible enemies. Speaking of improving, dont you know M4A1, M16 all are just technically "improved" versions of AR-15, which was made way back in 1958. M16A2, which is just a longer version of M4A1, and a direct predecessor to the M4, was out in the early or mid 80s, which means that its design was already there well before Doomsday. Speaking of which, I dont think designing M4 would be such a big task. I appreciate your efforts in the ANZAF section, HAD, but leave the guns to me. And why would Embraer build aircrafts for ANZAF? Its a Brazilian company and ANZC & SAC are political rivals right.

Embraers a private company isn't it? if the CANZ pays well, why Wouldn't Embraer build aircraft for the ANZAF? and about the politics, well brazil needs a working population,, to provide jobs and a large order from the CANZ would provide those jobs. anyway, the aircraft i mentioned are for Air Defence. Building Air Defence fighters would not upset SAC to much, would it?--HAD 08:20, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

if you feel these reasons are inadauqate, i will change the manucfactuers to Pilatus and give the ANZAF a locally built AEW platform based on the C-130 airframe. in fact, i will do so right now. (10.41 GMT).--HAD 09:41, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

MC Prank 16:48, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

I dont know much about Embraer's shareholders, but it was founded in 1969 as a Public sector company and with the halt of democracy in Brazil post-DD, I dont think its plausible for it to become private. And I dont think there would be this sort of economic relations b/w the SAC & CANZ. They are virtually on the brink of a Cold War, as seen in the case of the Indian subcontinent. CANZ supports India whereas SAC supports Pakistan. SAC has been hostile to the use of English, and its the main language of Australia. MC Prank 12:04, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

which is why i have changed the article to aircraft sourced from Pilatus. --HAD 12:38, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, its good -- MC Prank 13:04, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

do you mind if i do some work on the Celtic Aliance military? i assume they would have a strong navy, particulary in amphibious warfare and marines, along with air mobile infantry and air force ground support/fighter aircraft? --HAD 08:59, September 23, 2009 (UTC)

I dont have any problem, ask the seniors -- MC Prank 08:57, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

Also, I think the USA would transfer at least an F15 to the CANZ and a possible design of the F22. -- MC Prank 09:06, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

F-15, possibly. F-22 No. it was an idea at tthe time, a concept for the future. --HAD 12:46, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

China or Chinas
just to start The Population of China’s Provinces Compared with countries population. i am Fero good loock--201.255.54.35 06:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I doubt there would be a united China, but a Third East Turkestan Republic is a possibility. Mitro 12:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * By the way I mentioned this on some other page but I think that Tibet would grab the chance to form an independant state. DarthEinstein 13:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Before we get further into this I want to point out something that has bothered me from the beginning about this timeline. Why was China nuked in the first place? I know that relations between China and the Soviets were pretty bad in the 1980s, but I don't think it was so bad that they would nuke each other. It doesn't make any since to me. If the Russians are so freaked out about the ICBMs that (they think) are about to slam into there country, I doubt they would risk getting hit with more by attacking another nuclear power unprovoked.

Now I think I can accept it getting nuked but only if there is a really go explanation for this. Otherwise I think it would be more realistic to have China survive doomsday. Maybe not as a great power like OTL, but as unstable state barley heeled together. I know it might be a major change, but I can't see much sense in how its set up right now.--ShutUpNavi 21:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Call me crazy; but America could be looking out for itself in this situation. Nukings across the world could bring these 2 communist nations together; or at least in the paranoid minds the men who have the keys to the "eject nuke" button. I don't actually know the real name for said button, so don't laugh at me too hard :) Mr.Xeight 22:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * To be reasonable i think China was nuked by USA, not by URSS, that way should be in the timeline; a accept a new free tibet, or try to free; and i say China is a 1/5 of OTL world populaion today and in 1983 too, we must talk about them, time to take a desition, they are dead, live? in China, in the west, in the south, in the moon? --Fero 00:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * In 1987, the US Department of Defense came up with projected paths that Soviet armed forces would use in case of World War III. Their maps not only showed invasions of Europe, the Middle East and Alaska, but also showed a Soviet invasion of China through Manchuria and Xinjiang.  My guess is the DoD analysts thought that the Sino-Soviet split was severe enough that if the USSR ever started WWIII they would attack the Chinese as well because they thought the Chinese might stab them in the back.  As a side note the guys who made the film Red Dawn thought so as well, and I do believe they had some retired generals help with the story, though not a great persuasive source IMO.  Just some stuff to add to the discussion.  Mitro 14:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Was it established the nukes dropped on China were American? Who's to say those nukes didn't say "Made in Moscow"? Mr.Xeight 19:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Mitro explained why the USSR was likely to attack China. They were getting on far worse with the Chinese than the US was, I believe.  MItro, why was the USSR thought to be planning attacks in the Middle East?  Do you know any likely targets?  That would certainly help us get started on that region - our work so far has been us sitting around going, "What?  Israel... Gulf War... Arafat... what?"  Benkarnell 21:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I think it was to get control of the oil there and deny it to the west. Here is the link where I found the info: http://techconex.com/tcblog/2008/04/05/mapping-world-war-iii-soviet-global-invasion-routes/ Mitro 14:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Of course, it was the Soviets who nuked China. The Sino-Soviet split, was more severe and it had started much before than any of you can think. You fellas dont know how much the USSR helped India in the minor 1962 Sino-Indian Border Conflict, which was overshadowed by the Cuban Missile Crisis.


 * Well, one can expect a return to the warlord era in China, with a rather high population for the world, low for China (about 200-300 Million). Taiwan will likely have invaded the mainland at some strategic locations that have not been nuked, and established itself as the successor of the PRC in the eyes of ANZC. At the same time, various “nations”, made up of dictators, republics, etc., fight for supremacy, with nuclear combat still occurring due to loose nuclear stockpiles unused by the PRC during Doomsday. A major issue though is the status of Hong Kong, as I am not completely certain it would be hit by a nuclear weapon, but at the same time, it could. If not, it would be severely affected by fallout from the Chinese interior, and either would seek aid from ANZC or Taiwan. Macau would suffer in a similar situation, though the Portuguese would likely be overthrown after trying to maintain control until communication with Portugal could be reinstated. Lahbas 20:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Taiwan because of its relation with the US would probably be attacked (hence why Ben removed the original reference to a Taiwan state on the updated world map). I would also think Hong Kong as a British possession would also be targetted.  Mitro 20:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, a major question is if any of the Chinese nuclear weapons were able to make it off of the bases before being hit by Soviet nuclear weapons. There was no way to currently deploy nuclear weapons other than through strategic bomber aircraft, and even then, there would be a question if they would be deployed solely against either the Soviet Union, or also aimed at Formosa, and other countries. If anything, Taipei and Kaohsiung are the only cities I can imagine being hit (which would likely be enough), but that is only if the Chinese Air force is able to get off the ground, and make it through the Republic of China’s Air defenses. Therefore, that is the pivotal point we must decide upon; whether the Chinese Air Force was able to deploy its nuclear weapon in the field, before being destroyed by a Soviet First Strike? My answer is no. Lahbas 13:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Basically, the whole idea is that most of the PRC’s bomber fleet is destroyed on the ground by the Red Air Force. Two bombers do manage to head to targets in Taiwan. Kaohsiung City is lost, but Taipei City is saved after the bomber is shot down in the South China Sea. By the Present-Day, the ROC has taken Hainan, while moving into mainland China, which has Balkanized. The ROC is also considered the legitimate successor to the PRC by the LON. Lahbas 01:16, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * See China (1983: Doomsday). Though I know that there was another proposal earlyearlier - it hasn't been done. --Nathanmswan 16:23, September 4, 2009 (UTC)

Work on China has stalled. Unless someone wants to adopt the article I think it should be marked as obsolete until someone comes along and finishes it. Mitro 13:59, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

Middle East
I'd actually propose that instead of the Middle East getting nuked by East or West, I'd suggest that they nuked themselves into oblivion, so that most of the Levant is a slag-heap.

I'd like to say that as far as Libya and Tunisia is concerned they're "countries that time forgot."

And Mr. Xeight and I are working up Egypt as I type this. Louisiannan 21:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Specifically, who nuked whom? Israel was the only Middle Eastern country to actually have nuclear weapons, and it's safe to assume they attacked somebody.  Iran and Iraq certainly had chemical WMDs and were busily using them against one another, and possibly their neighbors.  I agree that a regional plan is probably needed for the Mideast, as opposed to our normal country-by-country process.  Benkarnell 15:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Alright, here’s what I had in mind for what I wrote on my Middle East pages.

With most of Turkey blown up, the Kurds in the southeast manage to establish an independent Kurdistan without much resistance. Wanting to reunite with the rest of the Kurdish populated areas they join in the Iran-Iraq war (which in this timeline is still called the gulf war) on Iran’s side. Although reluctant because of its own Kurdish population, Iran decides to help them in exchange for dropping its claims on Iranian Kurdistan. Iraq eventually collapses because of the now 2 front war, as well as lack of foreign support from the US and Soviet Union. Saddam becomes unpopular because of his use of Scorched Earth tactics in Iraq and is eventually overthrown by an extremist Shia dictator. Like OTL Iraq decides to invade and annex Kuwait, but with none to stop them they soon invade Saudi Arabia and capture the oil fields there. I haven’t worked out what happens from here, but I would imagine things would go south from here and that another war would soon break out.

But this was just my idea of what could happen. Fell free to change what ever you need to with it, because I won’t be working on these pages for awhile.--ShutUpNavi 22:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


 * That's a good beginning, I think. Chemical weapons were probably used more indisriminately, right?  And what about that Assyria place?  What is that?  Benkarnell 22:51, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

If I may; I have another problem to add to this mix. We both have pages on Kurdistan and an Assyrian Republic. The problem; the areas they respectably claim are exactly the same. Plus, I don't the Shi'a dictator of Iraq would last long. Mr.Xeight 01:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Ayatollah Khomeini planned on expanding Radical Islam across the Middle East. Any alliance with Kurdistan would be short-lived. At the same time, Iran would have more likely absorbed Iraq than allow its continued independence. From there, it would have marched on Kuwait and the Arabian states. The result would be a devastating war between the Fascist governments of the Arab World, against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Israel would finally find itself in an uneasy peace with its neighbors. At the same time, they could easily launch a nuclear attack upon the Iranians, either if asked by the Arabs, or if the Iranians get too close for comfort. Lahbas 03:58, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

When exactly would Israel launch its nuclear attacks against his neighors? Also how about a new article for the attack: ? Mitro 15:55, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't think it's likely that Israel is just going to nuke its neighbors right away (i.e. the first few years post DD). Here's a more plassable version I had in mind. With time I would imagine Israel would be severally weakened after DD from lack of forging aid as well as fighting constant wars with its neighbors. As Hellerick put it earlier "OTL's Israel is not a self-sufficient country, it's fed by the United States and the Jewish diaspora. No civilized country can survive a perpetual war on its own."

After a while perhaps the Arabs see this as a chance to finish off Israel and start another Arab-Israeli war. This time they nearly succeed until Israel uses its nukes. While this saves the Jews for the time being, it causes them to be seen as a mass murdering state by the rest of the world. This would give the Greeks/LON/anyone else the perfect opportunity to intervene in the Middle East and take over the countries there.

Again feel free to use as much or as little of my idea as you like.--ShutUpNavi 17:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Just my two cents: nuked cities aside (if any), The bottom half of the Middle East would probably stay largely intact politically (possibly realignment?). Going from ideas above, an independent Kurdish nation, and Iran winning a war against Iraq would probably leave Iraq in a mess. Northern Iraq joins Kurdistan, Eastern Iraq gets annexed or puppet'ed with its Shia population to Iran, and the rest including Baghdad ends up much like how Iraq is now in 2009; civil conflict. As for Israel randomly nuking countries, unlikely unless attacked first and probably more of a tactical military use rather than aiming at cities; with Iraq, Egypt and Syria fending for themselves that is the main anti-Israel body of the 20th century removed. If Israel survives, it might jump at the chance to extend its borders as far as possible, including full control of the Palestinian Territories, and any land that has water sources and chances for irrigation. And depending on how right wing you want to go, kick or kill all the Arabs out. Its unlikely Iran and Israel would goto war, they are surprisingly chummy despite the retoric both back then and now, and would be too busy dealing with their own areas of influence to bother each other. Mikebloke 00:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * In any event of a third world war, Iran would have been nuked by the Soviet Union, so as to allow a push to the Persian Gulf to secure its oil reserves, and disrupt oil shipments to the Western World. Therefore, it is hard to exactly judge how the Iran-Iraq War would have proceeded (My previous judgment was bad, that much I know from the info which supports my current view.) Iraq is the big question mark, as I am not sure Baghdad would be the recipient of a nuclear weapon, being an ally of both the Soviet Union and the United States. Therefore, it is possible that Saddam Hussein continues to exist in this world as a fascist dictator in the Middle East, with expansion throughout the region in all directions. At the same time, Iran’s government could have largely escaped the destruction of its cities, and managed to overrun Iraq, and then proceed into Arabia. There is no easy way to tell what the situation would become. Israel is the only state that would definitely exist, as its nuclear armament would prevent a successful invasion of its territory even with a coalition of nations. Again, there is a question mark on if the Soviet Union would launch a nuclear attack upon the Israelis. Though they sympathize with the Arabs in the Arab-Israeli conflict, they were among the first nations to recognize Israel’s existence. I can imagine a conventional attack, but the nuclear option is the uncertainty. Lahbas 20:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

I would like to know the article that said that. I know the Soviets planed on invading the Middle East in the event of a conventional war, but I have never herd about them nuking Tehran. Besides taking over the oil fields of these countries would have been of little use in the case of an all out nuclear war.--ShutUpNavi 23:22, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

Anway, why don't we have Kurdistan in the Kurdish parts of Turkey and northern Iraq, and Assyria in Southern Iraq and Kuwait. Maybe give Kurdistan some Syria and Iran as well. --Yankovic270 15:15, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

As a first time contributor I would like to say I have enjoyed reading the various articles written here since I first discovered the website earlier this year. As someone who was a 19 year old college student in 1983, I had, and still have, a major interest in world events. That said, I was interested in seeing how the Middle East would be treated, given the events which were taking place at the time. Since I had not seen anything, I decided to try my hand at penning several articles on the region. My focus at this point is on Lebanon; the multi-national peacekeeping force (MNF) posted in Beirut, Lebanon in 1983; and Syria. Having read a number of the thoughts posted on the fate of the Middle East I do not believe the region would have been wiped out. At the time, the US had military relations with Israel and Egypt and to a lesser extent Lebanon and Jordan, but did not have bases (unless I am wrong) or substantial prepositioned forces, where as Syria was firmly in the Soviet camp and part of their defense network. Since the Soviet attack would not have been preplanned, essentially a knee jerk reaction to what they believed was a sneak attack, I believe the intent would have been to knock out, rather than destroy, non-NATO countries who could supply assistance. To accomplish this I could see limited attacks against capitals and sites of countries which could provide military assistance in places like Egypt, Jordan, and Israel. However, in the case of Syria, because of its unique military relationship with the Soviets, I could see it getting plastered by nukes. As for Lebanon, I do not see it offering much in the way of a target for either side. Since Lebanon was in a virtual tug of war between Syria, the US, USSR, and Israel, removing these parties from the table wholly or partially, could be a boon to it in that it has a chance to deal with its secular problems and perhaps become a strong nation in the region. Further, I look upon the MNF as being forgotten in all of this and coming up as bit of a wild card with the potential to place a role in the country’s future. All this said, I have thoughts about creating a new nation in western Syria and Lebanon going through its share of problems, including evicting Syrian troops and a coup. Please take a look at what I have written and let me know your thoughts. As I have said, I have done a great deal of research, so much of what I reference was going on at the time. I have tried to stay within canon history, but since this is a bit of a gray area due to the lack of articles, please let me know if I have slipped up  in writing these articles. I have also generated some thoughts as to what Israel’s and Jordan’s future would be and would be interested in writing something on them as well. However, I do not want to intrude if someone is already writing one. Thanks. --Fxgentleman 18:55, September 25, 2009 (UTC)

//
I figured I would bring this up because Yugoslavia (or what became of it) is going to have a large impact on the countries left in Southern Europe. Being a leading member of the Non-Aligned Movement it’s unlikely to be nuked, but all of its blown up neighbors are sure to cause trouble. There are a lot of things that could have happened here. Instead of trying to map out what happens to it all at once, let’s start from the immediate effects of the disaster and work ourselves from there. I just wrote down what the likely effects of the fallout would be as well as the government’s response. Lets try to figure out what happens from here.--ShutUpNavi 16:52, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


 * added this to the proposals...I feel general okey about it... MR.Xeight, this is yours?? --Xi&#39;Reney 10:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


 * -Hello. No, actually, mine. Read through Doomsday and loved it, and though a Yugoslavia successor state could be a good thing to add (could be good if combined with the already existing stub for Yugoslavia Proper). If you find it worthy, I'll do some more edit. Cheers mate --Azazel voland 15:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I put Yugoslavia and the SSU together as one, feel it being more appropriate. Should be more productive than having two parallel discussions. Yugoslavia could be quite complex, given the ethnical conflicts and atrocities...with repercussions on surrounding states... Sicily, Alpine Confed, Greece... --Xi&#39;Reney 17:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Sounds good. Given that the ethnic tensions first escalated during the Croatian Spring in 1971, which caused massive unrest in Croatia, asking for larger autonomy, and the issues with Kosovo at the time, the situation was resolved by the new Constitution in 1974 which grated almost state-within-state rights for the 6 republics and 2 provinces. With the death of Tito, situation was again resolved implementing rotational presidency from each of the republics. Doomsday would probably cause massive secession at first, however, being that all the surrounding countries surviving population would probably flock into the country, the differences would have been overcome in the attempt to preserve the country from "outsiders". Isolation and focus on self-preservation seem like the appropriate answer.--Azazel voland 19:01, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Ethnic tensions in the Balkans run too high. The Muslim Bosniaks and any Muslim Albanian refugees would no doubt be targets for the Orthodox Serbs and Skopians. The Catholic Croats would equally be in conflict with both groups so after Yugoslavia (which has already been claimed by someone) there would no doubt be a mosaic of nations in the former Yugoslavia just as there was in our world. Plus radiation coming from Thessaloniki, Skopje, and Sophia would destroy the outer rim of Yugoslavia. The refugees that gave Hell to the Yugoslavians post-DD would also be a problem. I'm suspicious of a giant union of Southern Slavs. Mr.Xeight 03:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Mr.Xeight. Good points. However, during the ages, South Slavic nations have always been able to unite in times of need (especially when a foreign enemy is at the gates) and immediately overcome all differences if there is nothing else to do. In this particular situation, given that the "enemy" is radiation and refugees, their main concern would be closing the borders down. The ethnic torn in teh 90s could not have succeeded without foreign back up to some of the countries. Croatia and Slovenia had support from Germany and Austria, while Bosnians had the support of the US and the Arab countries. Without them in the picture, the funding, support and logistics, Yugoslavia would most probably survive the Fall of Communism. In the late 70s, to quote wikipedia, "The JNA (Yugoslav National/Peoples Army) enjoyed an international reputation as a powerful, well-equipped, and well trained force." It had 620,000 active military personnel and 3,200,000 reservists. With that kind of power, the borders could have been closed and order maintained. One of the reasons for the dissolution of Yugoslavia OTL was that the army did not create a coup in 1991, and thus prevented the wars that followed. JNA was always viewed as the "Liberation Army" and serving in it was considered a thing of honour in the 60s, 70s and the 80s (any young male that did not serve the regular year, was generally considered as not worthy...and could even have difficulty finding someone to marry him :)). With the military taking control of the nation, shutting down the borders immediately after Doomsday, and moving into non-radiated territories (Sofia and Thessaloniki would not pose that much of a problem due to the geographical landscape. Serbia and Bulgaria are separated by a range of 2500+ meter mountains, as are Macedonia and Greece. Slovenia would probably get affected as would Zagorje in Croatia, and 95% of the Adriatic coast. Perhaps, the only coastal area that would escape that fate would be the Bay of Boka Kotorska in Montenegro, due to its peculiar position.)Now, refugees, that would pose a serious problem, that is true, and those that got into the country would most likely be put in camps (as a notion, Yugoslavia did already successfully close it's borders in 1948 during the Inform-bureau crisis and implemented martial law. My only concern is that the country would need a very capable general to take control but be benevolent and patriotic at the same time. I estimate at least 2 - 3 million refugees from the surrounding countries. But, with most of the army surviving, that could be overcome. A military dictatorship would have saved the country at first, them also being responsible for food distribution and peace keeping. Also, Yugoslavia had it's own oil rigs in South Banat, that, in peace times, provided fuel only for military usage (so that the army would not depend on foreign import). That would sustain military mobility and better the control over the country. In my opinion, this is a plausible scenario.--Azazel voland 07:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I guess I was wrong. I am however opposed to "With amazing amount of luck, most of the harvested land in the province of Vojvodina and East Slavonia did not get affected by the radioactive dust". There is no luck in this TL, I've tried it with an iffy nuke not hitting Cyprus, it's been tried to save Britain, it's been tried to save Germany, and it's been tried to save West Virginia, only the second of my examples was deemed fair enough to pass to QSS. I would however appreciate if you asked before you drag the CoG into the mix. There is no love lost between the Greeks and Slavs of Yugoslavia, even Doomsday can't change that. As caretaker of the CoG I am opposed to any such alliance between the two nations. As such, I'd appreciate it if you pull the blurbs on Greece having open discussions with each other, free border crossings, a Joint Defense Agreement, and a trade union. Mr.Xeight 15:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, this conversations sort of petered out without a conclusion, so I propose that the article be promoted once we address Mr. X's requests. Otherwise it looks like a sound addition. 70.26.54.188 13:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I do not know how much damage this does to your plans, but Soviet Invasion plans of Western European included treating Yugoslavia as an enemy, including the deployment of nuclear weapons, notably the planned destruction of both Zagreb and Belgrade. Lahbas 20:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

I would like to know the article that said that. I know the Soviets planed on invading Yugoslavia in the event of a conventional war, but I have never herd about Belgrade getting nuked. If this is the case then Austria and Switzerland could have been nuked as well, since the Soviets planed on attacking these countries as well before moving on into Italy. Given that these targets were secondary and how sudden the nuclear war unfolded I could see these plans getting messed up and/or abandoned all together.--ShutUpNavi 23:22, September 15, 2009 (UTC)


 * What fate is drawing to Slovenia?, Will take the Alpine Confederation possession of territory or the South Slavic Union?, or does not form part of any of them?Tristanbreiker 17:21, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

The history needs some flushing out, a new flag is necessary and some new sections could be added. Mitro 19:06, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I though about this for a while and came up with some sort of draft set of proposals for South(ern) Africa. This proposal is done assuming that only New Britain, and the existence of the RZA is canon and everything else is open for discussion. The specific history of the latter, being a stub, is altered substantially by the proposal. I though I micht post this here as well, since it does evolve changes to a canon nation and deals with an entire region, and therefore cannot be executed without prior discussion. --Karsten&#160;vK (talk) 14:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * premise one: After Doomsday ans loss of contact with the Northern Hemisphere, authority in South Africa largely collapses

If there is going to be no futher discussion then could we make this canon? Bob 12:44, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

Eastern South Africa

 * To the east of the Cape province the Bantustans assume sovereignty over their own lands and try to establish control over the areas inhabited by their respective tribe. Lesotho and Swaziland do likewise.
 * Ciskei and Transkei ultimately merge to form KwaXhosa.
 * QwaQwa is absorbed by Lesotho.
 * KwaNgwane is absorbed by Swaziland.
 * The city of Johannesburg finds itself running out of supplies and ends up in a dire situation. The fighting is ceased when an uncomfortable marriage de raison is agreed on by ANC insurgents and those government troops remaining to keep the city as a whole from starving. Johannesburg militia join the Bantustans in search for arable lands and instantly clash with them.
 * The troops of the Bantustans beat the Johannesburgers decisively and start beleaguering the city.
 * After Johannesburg falls the rulers of the former Bantustans can't agree on who is to rule the city and ultimately accept a proposal by one of the 'stans' to place the city under joint control, which leads to the formation of the "Azanian League": a loose confederation of many of the Bantustans + Lesotho and Swaziland.
 * When Robert Mugabe managed to get parts of Rhodesia under his effective control, his Republic of Zimbabwe joins the League too.
 * The Xhosa and Zulu remain outside of this union. The latter ends up in a civil war between royalist and Inkatha party republicans.
 * As the Anglo-Africans leave the area for New Britain, the only convenient lingua franca comes to be Afrikaans, much to the annoyance of local rulers. --Karsten&#160;vK (talk) 14:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Can someone either resolve the Zulu Civl War or rename one of the Zululands?. I just don't see the point of two countries where there should be one. Royalist or IFP. It doesn't really matter as long as that needlessly complicated issue is resolved. I want all loose ends tied up in Southern Africa. And there are so many places not touched. There's Central Africa Indochina ,and South America. And what about European Russia? --Yankovic270 16:36, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

As New Britain has allied funded and armed the Royalist Zulus surely it would make sense for the Royalists to win. Bob 12:27, September 19, 2009 (UTC)


 * Bob, I seriously think you are overstating the importance of New Britain. Considering the fact that its population consists of recent immigrants unfamiliar with the land and former urbanites, NB is going to need Zulu aid a lot more than vice versa if it is going to have the agricultural economy described in the article. The fact that it has some of the Royal Navy on its side could mean that its able to deal a decisive blow to KwaXhosa early on and get control over the immediate vicinity of Port Elizabeth, but from then on its primary objective ought to be survival. Becoming a regional power just doesn't seem to be a realistic option to me. Needless to say that I'm not much of a fan of your recent additions to the article.
 * As for the Zululand civil war, the fact that the Drakensberg Range runs right through KwaZulu makes that it has a great amount of easily defendable places. In turn making that it is most "suited" to host a long lasting civil war with two factions exerting control over their respective sections. I don't see any necessity in ending the war just now just for simplicity's sake. Simplicity doesn't seem like something we should strife for if you'd ask me. --Karsten&#160;vK (talk) 14:50, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry that I seem a little impatient, but I'd really prefer for all issues with Sothern Africa are resolved. Any solution is better to me than seemingly perpetual argument. --Yankovic270

Western South Africa

 * After the attacks the only part of South Africa to remain under effective government control is the almost wholly Europeanised part round Cape Town. As the central government finally collapsed, local authorities assume control of the area. In the end this lead to a state dominated by the Afrikaans speaking coloured population, which I suppose will be quietly emancipated in quite liberal Cape Town. Note: coloured denotes mixed race in South Africa. In many ways these people are closely related to the Afrikaners. They even voted mostly for the Afrikaner National Party in the 1994 election, possibly forming the majority of the party's electorate, presumable because they feared being ruled by the black majority even more than being ruled by their Afrikaner relatives. By that logic I'm letting them stay loyal to the regime. Ultimately they may even start styling themselves "Afrikaners" as well. The still functioning government starts referring to itself as the "RZA". An actual declaration of independence never takes place.
 * The Griqua community, centred round Griquatown in the arid north eastern part of the Cape Province, assume sovereignty over their area again.
 * A rather radical Afrikaner group does likewise with the western part of the modern province of the northern Cape. Forming the "Volksstaat". Popularly known by the name of its capital: the Bitterfontein Republic.
 * Meanwhile in South West Africa, a group of ethnic German leaders meet in Windhoek and proclaim that now that South Africa no longer exists its mandate on the country has also expired and South West Africa is terra nullius. After having ensured themselves of the support of the local Afrikaners and Basters they declare themselves sovereign over the whole of the area. They however only manage to take control of the southern and central part of the country. Neither is the new country, which has started using the name and flag of the former German colony in the area, exclusively a German state. One may well claim that the region is effectively more under the control of the more numerous Afrikaners than under that of the Germans.
 * Triggered by the establishment of the Azanian League, leaders of the western states form a Union of their own. Calling it the "New Union of South Africa". Memberstates are the RZA, Bitterfontein, Griqualand and the DSWA. --Karsten&#160;vK (talk) 14:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm supportive of this new history, though I would like to see it in its final form. Mitro 02:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, presuming nobody objects against me interpreting the fact that this proposal didn't lead to a rush of comments as tacit approval for its general outline, I'll get to that as soon as I can. --Karsten&#160;vK (talk) 13:48, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I interpret your lack of response as agreement with me! (sorry -- had a flash of Eddie Izzard's "Sexie" stand-up routine. Heh.  It looks reasonable, as do most proposals you come up with Karsten. Louisiannan 14:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Your sporadic Izzard references bring joy to every forum you frequent!
 * Karsten, I think this is pretty sound, and it even manages to incorporate some older, tentative material (including ideas I put on the map purely out of my own head). The one thing is the RZA: it is definitely established that ANZC and South American troops set it up in the 2000s.  That's from one of the earliest versions of the Timeline; either XiReney wrote it before any of us joined, or else it was part of the raw material written even before he picked it up.  Either way, the occupation of Cape Town and establishment of the RZA is definitely canon.  The current  page mostly consists of canon material, with only a few bits of my own thrown in that are tentative, as far as I'm concerned.
 * As I see it, for them to even consider doing this in Africa (of all places!), life in Cape Town must have been increadibly, incredibly bad. So bad that there was popular support for invading a faraway continent.  The real reason, of course, was to conduct a kind of military/political experiment as a run-up to the creation of the League of Nations.  But there had to be something to prompt it.  Maybe a different town in the Cape Province could follow that history and be a Coloured-dominated, liberalizing sort of place?  Benkarnell 04:15, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

I must admit I'd never heard of Eddie Izzard before... and that I much regret that now that I do. Should seriously watch some more of this guy, genious! Thanks ;). To get back to the Cape, how does this sound to you?: I wasn't aware of the fact that the intervention had been included since it's very start, but I guess this could work to it to the basic outline. Feel free to criticise as much as you like though. --Karsten&#160;vK (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * After the attacks the only part of South Africa to remain under effective government control is the almost wholly Europeanised part round Cape Town. As the central government finally collapsed, local authorities assume control of the area.
 * To keep the support of the Coloured population, which was vital in beating down those riots that did occur in the Western Cape region, some Coloureds are appointed to government posts. The most important posts however remain in the hands of the Afrikaners.
 * One of the leaders of a Coloured militia created after Doomsday (I'm calling him Hendrikus van der Merwe for now, just to ease referring to him) grows dissatisfied by the relatively marginal posts given to his kinsfolk (or perhaps better said: grows dissatisfied by the fact that he wasn't among those appointed...) starts revolting against the Cape Town authorities and becomes an uncontrollable menace, ultimately taking over control over the state.
 * Van der Merwe streamlines the Cape into an authoritarian regime and starts some kind of personality cult.
 * Van der Merwe initially targets the Islamic Cape Malay population as a scapegoat for all problems of the RZA.
 * Ultimately, when this loses some of its effect, Van der Merwe also starts targeting another group that is somehow different from the norm: the local Anglophone population. Going as far as passing an edict that fully outlaws usage of the English language and forces people to use Afrikaans.
 * With Anglo-Saxons being actively persecuted, I guess international interference is only an inch away, regardless of the fact that it's happening in Africa...
 * After the interference the first truly free elections of the Cape are held.
 * The new democratic government chooses to remain a member of the New Union of South Africa. Which, being by far its largest member, the RZA has come to dominate.


 * I think that's a very strong storyline, and the totalitarian dictatorship is more or less what I had imagined for the region. I also like that it avoids the "All Afrikaaners are teh evil" trap, which the tentative plot line in my head did not do.  It opens the place up to some potentially fascinating stories.  I also love the idea of the personality cult!  I suspect there are a lot of those in the world of DD waiting to be discovered. My suggestions:


 * "RZA" should be the name only of the provisional government set up by the outsiders. The name itself has such a temporary, occupied-country feel to it - it's not even a name, just three letters that officially don't even stand for anything.  Van der Merwe's state as far as I'm concerned could be anything from "The Grand Imperial Realm of All Africa" to the "Free People's Democratic Republic of the Cape" to "Cape Town", but RZA is I think the name of the provisional government.  For a full history,  could be moved to.
 * I know you said it was a temporary filler, but I'd suggest finding an actual Coloured radical to stand in for Van der Merwe.
 * The persecutions of Malays and Anglos is a very nice touch. I'd suggest moving it earlier in time so it can become part of the story of the founding of New Britain.  The 2006 invasion doesn't have to be an immediate response to new persecution; its purpose can well be to stop ongoing, long term oppression.  (Remembering once again that both the Aussies and the Latins had ulterior motives.)
 * Depending on the makeup of the New Union, Cape Town may not be its largest member, especially if certain minority groups were "encouraged" to flee the area. KwaXhosa and Bophuthatswana could potentially be huge.
 * Benkarnell 17:21, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Well I only chose "Van der Merwe" because it rolls of the tongue nicely when pronounced with a thick Afrikaans accent, a real person would indeed be a lot better. From the seventies onward the Coloureds had their own parliamentary representation in South Africa, I guess our "Van der Merwe" would likely be among those people if he half-expected to attain a government position. Having a list and some bio's of the members of their House of Representatives would be great. I'm currently browsing the PiCarta central Dutch academic catalogue to see if I can find something, but sadly enough all potentially interesting hits thus far are not available in Groningen.
 * Moving the persecutions earlier in time seems like a great idea to me.
 * In my outline the New Union only consist of the western states of what used to be South Africa. Since all other states of the Union are in semi-arid zones, I guess the Cape would dominate a Union composed as such. Bophuthatswana would be a member of the Azanian League and KwaXhosa is documented as being independent from both blocs. But of course nothing is set in stone yet. --Karsten&#160;vK (talk) 19:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

I think I might have just found a suitable Van der Merwe: Peter Marais. Was a member of the Coloured parliament during the eighties for a relatively minor party and subsequently went on to hold seat in parliament for more than half a dozen parties, leaving a trail of destruction behind him. Opportunist if ever there was one so it seems. And incompetent enough to be in dire need of the described scapegoats. But nevertheless apparently quite popular among the Coloureds. --Karsten&#160;vK (talk) 12:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi all,

I love uchronia, and I've read a lot of the work this community has done on various timelines. Congratulations to all of you for the good work.

Well. I see there are little articles about Brazil in alternate timelines, and I wonder if I could contribute to the wiki, since I know something about Brazilian OTL history (I'm not an historian, History is quite of a hobby to me).

My first thought is about the 1983:Doomsday timeline. Brazil, at that time, was on the verge of democratization (after 30 years of military dictatorship and phony indirect elections). There were movements such as "Diretas Já" (in which one of the leaders was OTL current president Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, a syndicalist at the time). A nuclear war on that time would dramatically change Brazilian history since then.

Some thoughts include:


 * No Brazilian cities directly targeted by nukes (Brazil has always took a neutrality on foreign issues), but some rogue warheads hit some areas and some cities were victims of radiation and fallout.
 * President General João Baptista Figueiredo halted the democratization process for a while. Tancredo Neves died as in our OTL in April 21st, 1985, due to health problems, and José Sarney never became President.Paulo Maluf, the military-supported OTL candidate (who was a civilian), was never indicated as well, since the military decided it was best for another general to run Brazil due to the war state.
 * The halting of democratization caused civil war in Brazil, with massive rioting in Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo, Belo Horizonte and Porto Alegre. Since Brasilia (the capital) was a merely administrative city, with the majority of its population or being in the public service, or being on commerce (supporting the public service), there were few protests there, easily suffocated by the military.
 * Rebellion was suffocated on Rio, Sao Paulo and Belo Horizonte, with most of the rebellious leaders (including Lula da Silva, Franco Montoro - governor of Sao Paulo state but which supported the rebellion, and others) imprisoned or killed, but not without great loss of life, both rebel and military, not counting civilians caught on mid-fire. In Porto Alegre the government didn't go so well, specially because local rebels were also supported by the local military. State of Rio Grande do Sul seceded from Brazil in 1986, forming the Republica dos Pampas (Porto Alegre as the Capital). The local military which were against the secession were offered an opportunity to join the Pampas military force, or return unharmed to Brazilian territory.
 * The separatist movements, along with the rioting (which continued on major cities, even though not so intense) and the halting (now completely) of the democratic process led to another Congress shutdown in 1987 and state of siege declared. As a consequence, the 1988 constitution (OTL) was never voted nor promulgated. AI-18 (Institutional Act 18) was outorgated by the president, restricting civil and political rights once again and was even more hardlined than the 1968 AI-5. Official curfew was declared on all capitals, with the restriction of public gathering on all of Brazilian territory, including demonstrations, religious celebrations, or even cultural (such as Carnaval) or sports events. These events (religious, cultural and sports) could be held, however with no local public, only being transmitted through TV. Universities (public and private) were under strict monitoring from the government, with student organizations banned and deemed as illegal (once again).
 * A large section of State of Santa Catarina (including the Capital, Florianopolis) seceded from Brazil in 1989, joining the Republica dos Pampas. Since most of the military force was allocated on larger cities to enforce curfews and control rioting, there was little resistance from federal forces. However, at that time, Brazilian government hasn't recognized República dos Pampas sovereignty, occasionally attempting to regain that territory.
 * Former congressman Ulysses Guimaraes, who was arrested on the 1986 riots, dies in prison in 1989, of a heart attack. Although suspicious (since mr. Guimaraes was in good health conditions when arrested), the investigation of his death led to the assumption that his heart attack was related to his advanced age.
 * Since there was no democratization process, Fernando Collor de Mello was never elected President as well, nor did Fernando Henrique Cardoso (this one was in prison because of the 1986 riots as well).

.. and so on.

To avoid having to rebuild the 2009 world map, democratization would occur sometime before that and Republica dos Pampas would rejoin Brazil (since the dictatorship was the reason for secession anyway).

what do you think?

Best wishes,

Bira (ubiratamuniz)

ubiratamuniz
 * Do they still use the Cruzero, the Nova Cruzero, or are they on the Real at this point? Y Bem-Vindo!  A very well thought out suggestion, and I think it would fit in well with the timeline, from my understanding.  Other's comments? Louisiannan 15:18, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm glad someone's contributing to South America. For one of our "superpowers", their nations remain woefully underworked. --DarthEinstein 15:31, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * I like the idea so far. When are you planning on working on the article?  [EDIT] Don't forget that Brazil is one of the founders and leaders of the, which as DarthEinstein pointed out is one of the two most powerful states in Doomsday and yet little has been written on, in case you are interested in tackling that as well.  I'd be willing to help as well.  Mitro 16:03, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * I can begin on my free time :-) . I checked the timeline and the South American Confederation is formed in 2004 ATL. Maybe that's enough time for Brazil to reunite. I think as well it would be interesting to see an alternate currency for Brazil, since none of the presidents which changed currencies (Sarney with Cruzado and Cruzado Novo, Collor with New Cruzeiro, Itamar Franco/Fernando Cardoso with Real) came into presidency in my suggested Brazilian timeline, at least not before 2002, which would be an interesting date for redemocratization/reunification (it would coincide with Lula's first election in OTL). I have some other ideas on developing this section of the ATL... I didn't put all here because not all are written yet. But surely I will discuss those with the community.Ubiratamuniz 17:42, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * Other developments I considered so far:


 * Successful secession of State of Santa Catarina along with the incapatibility of the central government to uphold the separatist states led to another breath of hope to anti-dictatorship protesters. Despite the siege state declared by AI-18, resistance began to gather in Sao Paulo in 1990, and even with a few arrests, continued to gain strength. The underground movement expanded its arms to Rio de Janeiro and some portions of Minas Gerais (including the capital Belo Horizonte) and movement members from the three states (which are the most industrialized of the entire Brazilian territory, and have most of the country resources, including oil and sugarcane crops - both essential for Brazilian fuel production) began talks with the Republica dos Pampas for a covert shipment of weapons and supplies. The Pampas government published a bill stating that when Brazilian democracy is effectively reinstated, there will be an referendum on the Republica dos Pampas to decide whether or not to rejoin Brazil.
 * In Christmas 1990, rebels in Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte, in a coordinated and "surprisingly" surprise attack (Brazilian intelligence agencies were more concerned on detaining isolated students and teachers than assessing real threats), took over the government of the State of Sao Paulo, State of Rio de Janeiro and State of Minas Gerais, entrenched themselves on the government facilites of those states with no loss of life, threatening to seccede from Brazil unless general elections with free party association are immediately called, all political prisoners were immediately released, and AI-18 is lifted. The remainders of state of Santa Catarina,State of Parana, State of Espirito Santo and State of Bahia endorse the rebels declaration. Other states remain neutral, waiting to see what happens, or having problems of their own to deal with (specially some North and North Eastern states which had to deal with fallout consequencies and starvation due to increased drought because of the war).
 * Facing the threat of deindustrialization and shortage on fuel supply, Brazilian military government (president now General Newton Cruz) had no option than to open talks with the rebels. República dos Pampas sent representatives to the negotiation, ractifying the promise of a referendum if free elections were held on Brazil. The meeting took place on New Year's Eve, and was known as "Acordos do Ano Novo" (New Year Accords). The summit ended on January 10th, with the following guidelines established:
 * Immediate release of all political prisoners in Brazil, with full amnesty. Among the notable leaders released were Luis Inacio Lula da Silva and Fernando Henrique Cardoso.
 * Immediate lifting of AI-18, restoring all civil liberties.
 * Full free elections due to November 15th, 1991. The election for Congress would create an National Constitutional Assembly, in order to make a new Constitution for Brazil.
 * Reopening of the Congress and all Legislative branches
 * Transition government supervised by the former Senate (the senators that were still alive, representing each State)
 * Recognition of República dos Pampas by Brazilian Government if reunification were to be rejected by the people on the referendum.

I think demotricisaion would be put on hold becuse without foraigh trade Brazils economy would be on the verge of callapse--Owen1983 16:37, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * República dos Pampas, as a gesture of good faith, executed the referendum on April 21st, with a landslide victory for reunification, 89% willing to rejoin Brazil, 8% willing to remain independent and 3% abstention. This allowed not only the end of hostilities, but also allowed Gaúchos (the name of the Rio Grande do Sul natives) and Catarinenses (natives from Santa Catarina) to run for presidency and other political jobs.
 * Candidates for the 1991 elections were: Luis Inacio Lula da Silva (PT), Paulo Salim Maluf (PDS), Fernando Collor de Mello (PRN), Mario Covas (PSDB) and Olivio Dutra (PRPG), among others less noticeable. This was the first multilateral direct election since 1960,when Janio Quadros was elected (whom resigned in 1961, being replaced by the vice-president Joao Goulart whom was overthrown by the military in 1964).
 * Mario Covas died of cancer during the campaign and was replaced by the sociologist Fernando Henrique Cardoso, who was also arrested on the AI-18. Results for the first term were: Lula 22%, Fernando Cardoso 21%, Paulo Maluf 12%, Fernando Collor 12%, Olivio Dutra 10%, others 20%, abstension 3%.
 * Second term elections were held on December 6th, with Fernando Cardoso as the winner, with 52%, Lula with 47% and 1% abstension. Fernando Cardoso took office on January 1st, 1992.
 * Brazilian economy wasn't collapsing, many of the American/European multinationals (specially on the automotive and machinery industries) already had branches in Brazil, and transferred their administrative operations to Brazilian soil. Ford and Volkswagen united to form AutoLatina, a joint-venture to improve transportation technology, although the individual "DNA" of each brand would be untouched (including the brand names). However, inflation was high, and a reestructuration of the economy was needed, since there were bills of million cruzeiros or even billion being printed. There came Plano Pré-Real, in 1993, which locked out most of the savings accounts for six months, in order to reindex the economy to another form of wealth (since the US dollar was worthless due to the destruction of the US). Some protesters complained but most of the population was tired of fighting and saw that as an prospect of a long term improvement for all the population. After the six months period, came the Plano Real in 1994, which created the Real currency (1 real = 1 million cruzeiros).
 * With the increase in employment due to migration of the corporations to Brazilian soil, along with the reduction on the population (due to the aftermath of the nuclear war), the Brazilian economy began to thrive. The new 1992 constitution established new groundrules for Brazilian politics, including the complete banishment of politics-related prisions and the limiting of two terms for President, Governor and Prefect. The first term for post-elections would be of 6 years, all later would be 4 years.
 * In 1997 elections, Fernando Cardoso was reelected on the first term, with 51% of the votes, Lula with 33%, the remainder with 10%, and 6% abstention.
 * Plano Real continued to improve Brazilian economy. Talks begin with other South American countries to form a Confederation of South America. Brazilian companies continued to go to other South American countries, which was called as "Imperialismo Brasileño" by some leaders.
 * In 2001 elections the former syndicalist leader Luis Inacio Lula da Silva is elected president with 60% of the votes, against 25% of the Fernando Cardoso supported candidate Geraldo Alkmin, 10% of others, and 5% abstention. Fernando Cardoso was probed for running to the government of Sao Paulo, but he was taxative on retiring from politics.
 * In 2003 an terrorist attack on a Petrobras refinery on Santa Cruz de La Sierra, Bolivia, killed 80 technicians (both Brazilian and Bolivian) and injured another 142, cutting half of the gas supply to Brazil. The attack was credited to "Unión Nacional Indigenista", led by Evo Morales.Morales denied the attack and claimed that UNI is a peaceful organization. The attack was in fact staged by the FARC in order to destabilize international relations in South America and prevent the formation of the Confederation.
 * In 2004, the Confederation of South America is officially formed as a supranational organization. Plans are to lift all South American borders by 2008.
 * In 2006, Luis Inacio Lula da Silva is reelected. Discovery of crude oil in the "pre-salt" layer on the Atlantic Ocean leads to another hump up on the Brazilian economy.
 * --Ubiratamuniz 19:40, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey guys, I added some info on the 1983: Doomsday - Brazil article. Look up and see what do you think. How do I ask to make it canon?Ubiratamuniz 14:41, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
 * You are pretty much doing it now by having this section on this talk page, plus I added the prop template to the article so people realize its still in the proposal phase. Now people will get the chance to comment, critique and change things so that everything goes along with the current canon.  I've already made some minor format changes, I'll start on the content as soon as I get the chance.  Just to warn you it usually takes a couple of weeks for something to be approved to canon due to all of our busy schedules.  In the meantime feel free to propose other ideas or work on current articles.  Mitro 15:49, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot, Mitro. I'll keep working on other issues of the article. Best wishes!! Ubiratamuniz 16:46, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Hey guys. I´m back to work. Unfortunately I was struck by that damn swine flu and was "knocked out" for a while. I´m beginning my article on the "Republica dos Pampas" pseudocountry (OTL Brazilian states of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina) I proposed on this ATL (I even have some ideas for flags). I intend to work more on the sections about Brazilian industry and foreign relations. Later I intent do collaborate on Brazil topics of other ATLs. Ubiratamuniz 01:19, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

The only problem I have is the amount of malfunctioning ICBM's. One or two hitting Brazil seems plausible, but three is too many. I would remove one of those ICBM’s. Other than that I would say graduate this page.--ShutUpNavi 13:57, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

There are mentions of a "2004 Reopening" by Siberians based in Sakhalin. Considering how isolated and removed Japan became in this timeline, can this be plausible? Likewise, would there still be a Provisional Regency in 2009, with the Emperor lost in Doomsday?114.108.210.148 03:06, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

It makes a lot more sense than a Australian Captain playing Commodore Perry. I mean, Siberian Sakalin is naturally closer to Japanese territory. It also makes sense that, despite everything, the Japanese would bounce back. They did after WWII, they would after Doomsday. And maybe there is a totally different emperor, or some heir that escaped the captital's A-bombing. --Yankovic270 15:47, September 21, 2009 (UTC)

Possible Existent Micro nations

 * These are a bunch of micro nations that could possibly have developed well in the Post-Doomsday world.

The Conch Republic is the only one that I am sure would survive and expand. There is no way to ensure equality, without taking away equality. 00:40, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Conch Republic
 * Hay-on-Wye
 * Llanrwst
 * Lundy
 * Republic of Saugeais
 * Seborgia
 * Sealand
 * I'll argue against the Conch Republic and several of the others because they are in no way self-sufficient prior to DD and they would either be awash in refugees and criminals or would starve to death. Louisiannan 14:23, September 3, 2009 (UTC)


 * The could be considered a micronation also. --DarthEinstein 02:25, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Could and should, I agree, Darth. Louisiannan 20:35, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

Don'y forget the Kingdom of Cleveland (1983: Doomsday) and Mancunia (1983: Doomsday)--Owen1983 11:39, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Mancunia was deleted some time ago because it was implausible for Manchester to survive. In all likelihood it would have been destroyed by Soviet nukes.  Mitro 15:14, September 3, 2009 (UTC)

I especially like the idea of a nation or micronation in the southern portion of Florida. Even more if the Conch Republic expanded past the Florida keyes. I could use an ally for Virginia. --Yankovic270 19:35, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

& Spain successor states
I have to develop enough this theory. My suggestions of successor states of Spain (considering the most likely target for nuclear impacts, evacuation routes, natural resources, the dominant direction of the winds that often fall from the Atlantic and the mountainous terrain) are: In the northwest, the most protected (where possible) the impacts of nuclear and electromagnetic pulses could be developed states in the regions of Galicia, Asturias and northern Castilla-Leon. In other less protected areas, but far from the core of impacts such as Extremadura, south-east around the provinces of Murcia, Almeria, Alicante and the Pyrenees could also develop other states, although not as strong as those of the Northwest. Here is my imaginary list of countries: And Euskadi of course, but it are in former France. Tristanbreiker 13:56, 3 september 2009 (UTC)
 * People´s Republic de Galicia. The most powerful of the successor states, on good terms with Celtic Alliance and Portugal.
 * People's Republic of Asturias. Possibly a client state of Galicia.
 * Union of Communities of Castilla and Leon. In conflict with the previous two.
 * Spanish Republic or Spanish National Government in the southeast, an heir of Franco's fascist dictatorship that after the occupation of Cartagena by the LoN is forced to initiate a democratization process and to initiate talks with Pais del Oro for the reunificacción of former Spain.
 * I've reverted Spain to its own article and have incorporated this information into it. I see no problem with Tristan's initial proposition. Louisiannan 18:12, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

Republic of Vermont
It's possible that the survivors from the fallout that hit Vermont would form their own country (there's already many Vermonters that want the state to become it's own country. There's a flag and everything).

I like the idea. But can "Anonymous" start working on the article. This idea has too much potential to just be "left hanging". And excuse me if I am being rude, but who are you "Anonymous". What is your username? And if you would start this article, I wouldn't object to it being adopted into the timeline. --Yankovic270 16:41, September 23, 2009 (UTC)

World Economy Guidelines
Hi all,

I began my work on Brazilian economy post-Doomsday, but I ran into a dead end.

Let´s get this straight:

In 1971, US unilaterally terminated convertibility of the dollars to gold (which was the base of the Bretton Woods system). This action caused considerable financial stress in the world economy and created the unique situation whereby the United States dollar became the "reserve currency" for the states which had signed the agreement(from Wikipedia).

Being the US Dollar the "reserve currency", and being US basically levelled down by Doomsday, and with all the gold stored in Fort Knox to keep the dollar-gold balance probably going radioactive, what would be the convertible factors for currencies of the surviving nations? Oil? Food? Water? An artificial flat currency system?

Should it be oil, what happened to the Middle East? No mention is made about OPEC, Arab countries and Israel on the timeline. It would be an interesting point of controversy regarding economic or even geopolitical issues.

Ubiratamuniz 16:16, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

IMHO I think the main priority would be maintaining Agriculture oe growing crops for human consumption --Owen83 17:34, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

I see.

in my point of view, some things happened to Brazil because of Doomsday:

- At the time of Doomsday, Brazilian economy was in a proteccionist state. Imports were largely restricted, but exports (specially of food and some manufactured goods, specially cars, trucks and coach buses) were thriving - Brazil wasn´t much dependant on oil, since at the time nearly 50% of the car fleet was running on ethanol due to the success of the Proálcool program started on 1975 (the first ethanol-powered car went to the market on 1979). In fact, Brazilian energy matrix was composed primarily of renewable power sources: ethanol for cars, hydroelectric plants for energy generation. Fossil fuels were used primarily by industries and cargo transportation. - being Brazilian largest cities spared from the nuclear blasts, Brazilian industrial centers were able to become the largest on the surviving world.

all these factores somehow partially shielded Brazilian economy from the massive breakdown that occured around the world.

Brazil being a large food exporter (specially soy grains and meat) redirected the production to feed its own population in order to avoid unrest, latter reversing to exports again. This allowed Brazil to be one of the largest food exporters in the post-Doomsday world and one of the leaders on humanitarian aid.

That´s the scenario I´m working with right now. I plan even to add company profiles to the wiki. For now, I have a six-page word document where I am registering my thoughts prior to publishing them. :-) EDIT: Please check the Brazil page. I´ve added some thoughts on Brazilian economy immediately before Doomsday and after. Of course, I plan to develop those ideas further.

Ubiratamuniz 17:52, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

more info on Armed forces
Embrenar of Brazil and Pilatus of the Alpine Confed are still in buisness. they could be the main Military Avation companies. maybe a reestablished Commonwealth Aircraft Coparation in CANZ? Pilatus and emrenar build trainers, cargo aircraft,and Mirage 3's. CAC build FA18's. is Saab still business? if they are and are selling, the ADC might have acess to top quality stuff, like Viggen jets. from HAD.

League of Nations - Celtic Alliance
How would people feel about a formal unification between a new state and the leauge of Nations? Given the major problems faced by divergant and disperate populationsthrough depopulation, death and starvation. I think we may need to see a greater movement to some formal recognition of the League as the final port of call e.g. Internatial Court, Assembly with law making and enforcement powers? Military wing, and greater powers for ?
 * Personally, I don't think it's a good idea. There are no nations in real life that have unified with the UN in this way, and besides, the LoN was just founded. Why would the Celts relinquish their independance to such a young organisation? --DarthEinstein 16:06, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree with Darth. There really is no precendent for this in history.  However you may want to look into allowing the ADC evolving into an EU like organization.  Possibly cooperation between the states over Sicily and Saugenay led to them considering bringing themselves closer politically.  Mitro 17:15, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

Sicily War?
By the way, what happened to Sicily? We're not really hearing about it anymore. --DarthEinstein 17:29, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * I split this off so we don't go off-topic. Honesty the whole war with Sicily kind of just stopped happening.  Whoever was working on it originally stopped.  I believe the ideas happened before I started editing the TL, so I was not there to see it be left unfinished.  From what little there is on it, it seems that Sicily backed off (maybe?).  If anyone wants to bring the crisis to its conclusion that would be great.  Mitro 17:50, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * Looking at the history of the page, Xi'Reney wrote most of it, and I haven't heard from him lately... seems to me like someone should pick it up and get it finished. (Not me - I'm already working on the war with Saguenay) --DarthEinstein 19:50, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that was definitely XR's story, and alongside the creation of the League of Nations itself was the first major news cycle ever written for the timeline! I think that part of its purpose was to galvanize the LoN into action and show that the new organization could and would act boldly.  It was also written long before we knew anything about most of Europe, and we might be in a better position to write about it now.  Benkarnell 13:11, September 26, 2009 (UTC)

Alliance?
How about we have an alliance of the more Tyrannical nations. You know, the nations denied membership in the LoN due to their government. Sicily, my Virginia, Thunder Bay. Any other dictatorships that may be in the world. --Yankovic270 02:30, September 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * Virginia and Thunder Bay might make sense if they're in contact, but Sicily is too far away I think.--Oerwinde 02:44, September 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree with Oerwinde, alliances are only effective if the nation is close by geographically or else one of the nations is powerful enough to make its presence felt across the world. Virginia and Thunder Bay are landlocked post-apoc survivor states and Sicily is surrouded by enemies.  Mitro 14:25, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

I concede on Siciliy, but Thunder Bay and Virginia would know of each other via Superior. --Yankovic270 23:58, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

Not going to do much with this page, just figured it would be a good nation to make. I figured it would be too small to be a nuclear target compared to more attractive ones in Western Europe. Any objections/suggestions? --ShutUpNavi 17:10, September 28, 2009 (UTC)