Board Thread:Timeline Discussions/@comment-10975360-20130619171432/@comment-4780584-20130623183506

GunsnadGlory wrote: Hang on, though, Nazis invade England?

How's that covered?

Firstly, the English would have fought, used chemical weaponry and anything else they could get their hands on against the Nazis. And the mere invasion would trigger off the Americans, against whom the Germans didn't have a hope in hell. Especailly not while fighting a similarly gigantic war against the Russians. Look at history; since the Rus actually arrived, only the Mongols have suceeded in taking them- and they never attacked the Urals, where it really got bad, AND they fought aginst a disunited Russia. An invasion through the worst parts of Russia, with a united Russia throwing everything they had against them- if the British lost and the Americans never entered, I'd still back the Russians in that fight. not entirely true, the mongols succedded and the germans in the first world war beat the russians, due to the russian ill preperation for war in the first world war. Germany similarly lost   in russia during the second war because they underestimated the russains.