Alternative History:Request for user rights

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF (user rights). Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only one administrator for every 1000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time a new one is needed or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

IMPORTANT: only registered users with 200 or more edits and at least two months on this wiki will be allowed to vote in the user nominations or to nominate candidates.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, as long as they accept the nomination first.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.
 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail or been blocked in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Reximus55
Today we held an AMA with Reximus and he told us a lot of interesting stuff. Rex appeared to have won over the crowd, and he proposed I should nominate him for constable. Let's see what the community thinks.

For anyone who missed the AMA, here is a summary of Rex's beliefs, and why he should be included in the government:

'''REMOVED - Yeah, real funny. This is your only warning. PitaKang- (Talk to me | ''' Kill count: 4)

You edit conflicted me as I was trying to remove it. Tr0llis (talk) 21:21, October 12, 2014 (UTC)


 * Supporters
 * Saturn (Talk/Blog) 12:24, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Objectors
 * Has shown himself to be racist, ignorant, and generally repulsive in his beliefs. Denied. Flag_of_South_Korea.png PitaKang- (Talk to me | Kill count: 4)
 * Discussion
 * ​You're f*cking hilarious, Tr0ll. Rex should be a constable, but he's not eligilble, and that picture of yours is just insulting. - Guns
 * Suicide? Who? FirstStooge (talk) 11:55, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Have you even actually gotten to know rex? All if the users on this wiki have the right to believe whatever they want, even if they are a Nazi, Communist, Gay, Jew, or Gentile. Has he mentally hurt a user over this? Yes. But this was a long time ago. Now I recomend to leave him the f*ck alone becuase he's: A. An AMAZING timeliner. Have you even taken the time to read his articles? It's pretty amazing. Even the Missippia page is amazing. B. Becuase he's held up since them. I've noticed that whenever the Mscovites can, they try to humiliate/bother Rex. This isn't needed since he's just trying to revive himself and too become one with the community. C. Is that he's very active. Rex has been around for only a year (and a half), and over 13,000 edits. That's really something, since I only have about 1,800 if them. This is defiantly a great user to nominate, and you guys seem to always foucus on what's he's done wrong and not right. It also looks like you intentionally interrogated him so you could get this "evidence" to use against him. A yes from me. Saturn (Talk/Blog) 12:24, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * This is in very bad taste. If rex said this recently, then action should be done against him, but doing this nomination is childish. Also who was drivven to suicide? Toby2: THEY CALL ME Mr. Awesome!!!
 * Rex told me I should nominate him, and he told me to show stuff like this. It is 100% approved and a good show of his true values. Who else to be but yourself? As for the suicide and the other people who were insulted, I left those people anonymous to protect their identities. I don't want to further embarass them by dragging them into this if they dont want to be included. I ask that all other users respect this decision and not throw names around. @Saturn No one is trying to attack Rex. These pictures were made to show his beliefs in a nut shell. Obviously he's not trying to change his personal beliefs, especially when half these pictures were taken about nine to ten hours ago.  Tr0llis (talk) 12:56, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Then action should be taken against him. Im surprised that Rex would go back to saying shit like this Toby2: THEY CALL ME Mr. Awesome!!!
 * Rex is obviously an AMAZING Role model and hero. His views are strong and vigorous. /s - Josh
 * Most of these are old, since Non used them on his poster and the blog posts are I think from FS' old blog. This is just insulting and low. And I don't see his approval anywhere. Also, are you seriously trying to get yourself banned? Sky Green 24 (Party,quotes) 16:42, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * This isn't even funny. And I laugh at a lot of things. 17:26, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Honestly trollis, this is why I always am so harsh on you, you, This is by far one of the lowest things you could have done (and on a side note this is why no one is helping you in pm3), I mean I don't agree with any of those beliefs nor anything but it is his right to have them and you know the user that suicided committed that for other reasons, ms had said so a few times before, and the gay user had (and may still have) problems in his life, something that Rex has no fault at. In fact that very user also became upset at a comment I made as a pun towards another user comment, a comment that was quite simple and non insulting. The rest of that image you posted falls within the freedom of speech. And honestly this is low even for you tr0llis, Shame on you dude. No need to go this low for anyone, not even Rex did this on Ms who he doesn't like. Sine dei gloriem &#34;Ex Initio Terrae&#34; (talk) 17:29, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * As someone who was on chat at the time I can verify, Rex wanted Tr0llis to do this. Actually when Tr0llis posted the image Rex said it wasn't enough. Also Sine I didn't say anything in regards to that. Mscoree (talk) 20:52, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ms you did, when I said that [User] was a fool to suicide over anything said on chat and the wiki you said " chat wasn't the main reason he committed suicide but one more added to the list ", hence his death is not his fault as tr0llis seem to claim, and if rex wanted he could have very well post it, let him ruin his name, dont ruin yours in the process Sine dei gloriem &#34;Ex Initio Terrae&#34; (talk) 21:05, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * That's nearly the opposite of what I said. Mscoree (talk) 21:08, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Tr0llis, if you pull anything like this ever again, you're gone for a week. Defaming another user (whether true or not) is most certainly not allowed; this will be your only warning. I'm taking the picture down, and don't upload anything like that ever again. Flag_of_South_Korea.png PitaKang- (Talk to me | Kill count: 4)
 * Rex literally asked him to though. Shouldn't Rex be the one in trouble, for actually saying all these things? Apparently Rex doesn't think there is anything wrong with it, considering he specifically asked Tr0llis to upload this for him. Harvenard2 (talk) 21:11, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't give a shit. Someone can ask someone to rob a bank, but the fault still goes to the one who robbed the bank. Plus, while what he says is repulsive and unsavory, it is allowed (epecially since this is live chat, not an actual page). Flag_of_South_Korea.png PitaKang- (Talk to me | Kill count: 4)
 * As I said on the TSPTF talk page, this was a sincere nomination, that Rex approved of. Rex sanctioned that picture and asked me to upload it for him. In fact when I uploaded it he said it wasn't good enough. I actually do want to nominate him, but when I consulted with him he said this is the appropriate way for me to do so. Tr0llis (talk) 21:17, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Neither you nor Rex decide what is or is not allowed on the Wiki. Flag_of_South_Korea.png PitaKang- (Talk to me | Kill count: 4)
 * All I did was take a picture of something as evidence. nd I had permission.  How come all the pictures of Ratc sockpuppeting are allowed? That is a picture of someone breaking the rules, without permission. I can't document a crime or something in chat? Tr0llis (talk) 21:22, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * First, Rex is breaking zero rules (and if he was, he wouldn't be elligable for TSPTF anyways). Second, posting said non-existant evidence in that way is ill-mannered and rude at best and rule-breaking at worst. If you had posted a list of Rex's crimes in the TSPTF page as a report, it would have been allowed. This is just making fun and being rude. Flag_of_South_Korea.png PitaKang- (Talk to me | Kill count: 4)
 * I didn't say it was breaking any rules (albeit I did compare it to a crime, in the same way how it is documentation). I'm not trying to be rude or anything, I am trying to do what Rex asked me. If I asked you to take pictures of me in chat and upload it, and then you did, would that be illegal? What's rude about this, I'm not poking fun. He literally told me to do this. Tr0llis (talk) 21:32, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * I've spoken to Rex on this matter. No sane individual would want to be nominated to the TSPTF in this way. He did not approve. Tr0ll, this is a childish jab at a person you obviously don't like.  —Bfoxius (talk)
 * Assuming any of this is in context- and I very much doubt it- it changes precisely jack. Rex did NOT ask you to do this, and even if he had, you should have more common sense than to post this year. You're damn lucky I'm not an admin, because if I was, you'd be back in two weeks.  22:27, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure this is a set up, because I was in the chat at the time, and Rex specifically told Tr0llis to nominate him and do this. It's dumb yes, and Tr0llis probably should have though otherwise, but don't make it seem like Tr0llis is purposely trying to troll Rex. Mscoree (talk) 22:29, October 12, 2014 (UTC)

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, a long as they accept the nomination.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Rules

 * Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.
 * They are a Lieutenant.
 * They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for nomination to be accepted.
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Impeachment
It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

 * User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
 * If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment.
 * Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
 * Registered users' votes must have two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons
There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:
 * They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
 * They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
 * They have have not been fair, restrained, and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
 * They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

Note: One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.

Current Impeachments
===Name of TSPTF member===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.