Alternative History:Request for user rights

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF (user rights). Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only one administrator for every 1000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time a new one is needed or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

IMPORTANT: only registered users with 200 or more edits and at least two months on this wiki will be allowed to vote in the user nominations or to nominate candidates.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, as long as they accept the nomination first.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.
 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail or been blocked in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Hailstormer
I would like to nominate Hailstormer for the position of Constable. He seems to be a very well rounded and level headed person, hes on chat alot (which means he can handle some of these pesky situations without it going to an admin) and he seems to be very well versed in population statistics among other topics as well. Also considering its rather calm attitude and ability to handle situations rather well (so ive seen) i feel like he would be a good addition to the ranks of Constable The Unchallenged Conqueror #FP (Talk to Me) 01:47, January 26, 2014 (UTC)


 * Supporters
 * 01:49, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Cookiedamage (talk) 01:56, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * The Unchallenged Conqueror #FP (Talk to Me) 02:27, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ratc3333 Here, Prepare for Combat (talk) 02:51, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Sine dei gloriem &#34;Ex Initio Terrae&#34; (talk) 03:05, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Fed (talk) 04:21, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Bowties are Cool (talk) 04:29, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ninjasvswarriors (talk) 05:26, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * This is UglyTurtle, Signing off. 04:33, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Daeseunglim (talk) 19:22, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Shadow - January 26, 2014 (EST)
 * Quashi (talk) 22:07, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Monster Pumpkin
 * CourageousLife (talk) 22:54, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * I am that guy (talk) 00:38, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Flag of Russian Alaska (HR).svg |40px|link=User talk:Octivian Marius]] OCT MARIUS, HAIL HIM  [[Image: Flag of Italy (Federalist Italy).svg|40px|User talk:Octavian Marius]]
 * [[Image:1.png|23px]] Imp (Say Hi?!) 23:36, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Local Mafia Boss (Talk) (Blog)
 * FirstStooge (talk) 01:29, January 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * Objectors


 * Discussion
 * I've seen Hail try and resolve arguments peacefully in several places, including on chat, and try to mediate massive disscussions and arguments. He expressed his frustration to me during the Ms Sockpuppet thing about not being able to calm down the chat because of his lack of mod powers.  01:49, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * And again, we need him to accept first. [[Image:1.png|23px]] Imp (Say Hi?!) 01:53, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Agreeing with the above points. Hail is a very level-headed person and manages the be nice as well as collected and smart. Cookiedamage (talk) 01:56, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * I would like to thank Feud for this nomination, as well as Guns and Cookie for their kind words. I happily accept this nomination. As Guns said, I have expressed my frustration to a number of people as my attempts to calm down chat and regulate it are limited by my lack of mod powers. I have chat running on my computer pretty much all day on most days, and I believe that I can be of real use as a constable as a result. Hailstormer (talk) 01:59, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ooh... don't mention chat!!  02:57, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * We need more TSPTF people seeing as so many of them are active, and Hail seems like he's level-headed enough to be one of them. Fed (talk) 04:21, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * I guess now would be a good time as any. :P [[Image:1.png|23px]] Imp (Say Hi?!) 23:36, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, a long as they accept the nomination.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Red VS Blue
Besides the fact that I can't comprehend why he isn't admin yet, Red is active, nice, and has one hell of a timeline under his belt. He communicates with the people and is a good person overall. I don't think I need say more. 00:37, January 24, 2014 (UTC)

I would be happy to accept the position of Lieutenant in the TSPTF. I am neither among the most active members of the Althistory Wiki, nor am I particularly opinionated on major issues that have arisen, but I intend to be a sysop who injects as neutral a view as possible into site-wide debates and who assists with the general cleanliness of the site.

Thank you, Scrawland, for the nomination! Red VS Blue (talk) 19:24, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * Supporters
 * Monster Pumpkin
 * CourageousLife
 * 00:56, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * Banner_of_the_Holy_Roman_Emperor_with_haloes_(1400-1806).svg Labarum.jpg CrimsonAssassin- I have special eyes 19:15, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:1.png|23px]] Imp (Say Hi?!) 01:51, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Fed (talk) 01:56, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * This is UglyTurtle, Signing off. 04:33, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Katholico (talk) 05:05, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Objectors
 * Discussion
 * 'Have you actually asked him yet? ~G
 * Dammit I forgot that. ~S
 * This is long overdue. Red vs. Blue's Superpowers timeline was the first timeline I read when I browed the site for the first time years ago. It was what really got me hooked on this wiki. Congrats to Red vs Blue! Banner_of_the_Holy_Roman_Emperor_with_haloes_(1400-1806).svg Labarum.jpg CrimsonAssassin- I have special eyes
 * I read all of the Superpowers timeline in one sitting, that was the kind of power the timeline gained on me because of its vastness and interestingness. I have also observed Red to be a neutral voice in wiki matters and is widely respected. Good one Scraw, and Congratz Red. :) [[Image:1.png|23px]] Imp (Say Hi?!) 01:51, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Superpowers is indeed one of the best TLs of this site, and Red deserves every single bit of this nomination. Fed (talk) 01:56, January 26, 2014 (UTC)

Rules

 * Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.
 * They are a Lieutenant.
 * They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for nomination to be accepted.
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Impeachment
It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

 * User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
 * If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment.
 * Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
 * Registered users' votes must have two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons
There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:
 * They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
 * They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
 * They have have not been fair, restrained, and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
 * They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

Note: One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.

Current Impeachments
===Name of TSPTF member===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.