Alternative History:Request for user rights

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF. Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only be one administrator for every 1000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time a new one is needed or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Only registered users with 200 or more edits and at least two months on this wiki will be allowed to vote in the user nominations or to nominate candidates.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor so long as they accept the nomination first.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.
 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail or been blocked in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Feud
Feud really has gone above and beyond. Sure he has had his ups and downs, but I gotta say he has helped countless times, and really deserves this promotion. Feud is a user who can be relied upon to keep things running; a greater problem than vandalism in the recent history of the wiki. As such, I an nominating him for a (much deserved) Constabulary. As they say, third time's the charm.

Imp (Say Hi?!) 17:10, June 2, 2017 (UTC)


 * Supporters
 * User:Person67
 * With Blood and Iron (talk) 17:10, June 2, 2017 (UTC)
 * I mean, we do have a mod oversaturation, but... Feud is a competent person. He deserves it.     [[Image:Cthulhu.jpg|30px|link=User blog:Thewolvesden]]     [[Image:Wolf hd by arma3lonewolf-d8m9rto.jpg|38px|link=User:Thewolvesden]]     Deadly State of Mind    Leader of the Knights of Scraw.  23:17, June 3, 2017 (UTC)
 * 23:42, June 3, 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes. Curmudgeonly yours - Crim 05:01, June 6, 2017 (UTC)
 * As long as he remains opposed to the activities of the Communist Party of the United States of America, as outlined by House Un-American Activities Committee, I will support him. - GBUSA
 * 19:43, June 11, 2017 (UTC)
 * --Katholico (talk) 03:44, June 12, 2017 (UTC)
 * 17:00, June 16, 2017 (UTC) TFW you owe Imp a favor and he knows your Facebook
 * Objectors
 * While I think Feud would make an excellent mod, the mod administration seems to be already oversaturated
 * If we are being brutally honest. #BRINGBACK THESQUIRREL 03:19, June 4, 2017 (UTC)
 * Oversatuaration is a problem
 * Discussion
 * ​I accept on this one :D  Been on the wiki forever, been an active contributor forever as well, i have my own timeline, ive pointed out vandalism, ive modded two of the most prominent map games on the wiki, i give plenty of advice and tips on TL writing as well, i also hope to help incentivise the come back of the Map contests, Short story contests, as well as try to facilitate the development or creation of a new Community Timeline, something that can really get our userbase going in the right direction
 * About time too. [[Image:1.png|23px]] Imp (Say Hi?!) 16:59, June 2, 2017 (UTC)
 * seems legit. With Blood and Iron (talk) 17:16, June 2, 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't think we do have oversaturation to be honest. Most users on the list are retd./on hatius. So probably should update the lists then. Impishly yours, Imp (Say Hi?!) 00:15, June 4, 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinochet was completely correct in his actions on 9/11/73. To this effect, in opposition to the spread of the Communistic threat propagated by some of our members, it is indeed necessary to recruit further among the reactionary forces of the TSPTF. To this end, I support Feud's nomination and hope he will slay many Socialist untermensch. That is all - GBUSA

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor so long as they accept the nomination.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also have not had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Rules

 * Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (Please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he or she wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.
 * They are a Lieutenant.
 * They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a three-fourths super majority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a three-fourths super majority for nomination to be accepted.
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Impeachment
It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

 * User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
 * If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment, with support of at least one TSTPF member.
 * Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
 * Registered users' votes must have two-third super majority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-third super majority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons
There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:
 * They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
 * They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
 * They have have not been fair, restrained and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
 * They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

'''One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.'''

Current Impeachments
===Name of TSPTF Member===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.

United Republic
Ladies and Gentleman, I feel betrayed by this gross show of incompetence Lt. United Republic has shown me and many of my fellow Wiki users in the past month. While I may be a new member of this wiki I have experienced gross negligence by United Republic. Multiple times he has used racial slurs so gross to offend many of you along with myself, but today he threatened to ban a wiki member known as Gatthias for a confrontation that happened on the Discord of our fine Wiki. Where he continually attacked this young lady with personal inquires trying to “expose” her for something she is not. I plead with you members of the wiki, protect the many from the few with power, and join with me to impeach United Republic from his position of power. Where he has done much harm, to little help our great wiki.


 * Supporters
 * I haven't been on the wiki for very long, but in my short experience I've only seen UR cause harm, usually by trolling on chat, acting inappropriate, and interrogating/banning every new user. I'm sure he has done some good work in the past to become this rank, but unfortunately I'm voting for removal based on his current behavior. Gatthias (talk) 04:25, August 25, 2017 (UTC)


 * Objectors

Impeach the fuck out of me. I've been to hell and back in the past 48 hours. This is nothing. - UR  04:24, August 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * Discussion


 * As per the impeachment rules, you are required to have first attempted to sort this out on his talk page and reach a compromise. Posting 'Yo fam, I guess I have to do this before I can begin Impeachment procedings aganist you.' is not seeking a compromise. Furthermore, your recent ban on the discord does not lend any credibility to your impeachment attempt. This impeachment is not going to fly. Curmudgeonly yours - Crim 07:50, August 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * Crim, you may always vote against it as no other TSPTF members have complained about it go ahead and whine.- Jackson IDGAF about the time