Board Thread:Timeline Disscussions/@comment-32656-20121219042849/@comment-32656-20140322120533

That area is on the borders of a couple of states, and, really is barely inhabited at all. Not impossible for survivors in the towns of Fort Scott or Nevada, but a state is probably too much.

The nuclear targets map can be safely ignored - I don't think it has ever been accurate. Dozens of strikes not on it by this point, and probably more than that.

They were hit much worse than you think.

At least eight strikes in the Netherlands, anon. Most of the country is now either an arm of the North Sea, or a lake, depending. What the strikes, fires, and radiation did not accomplish, the floods did. That's why only the three areas have survivors.

As for the concept of resettlement, only the Netherlands Antilles - which claims the region, to one degree or another - has even talked about trying to settle what remains that is not still irradiated, and accessible, though Luxembourg is slowly expanding north into the southern areas. The areas that the NA could conceivably settle are basically just the coastal islands, and islands that would appear after the flooding to their south.

Toby, you would need to adopt it like any other article.