User talk:Lordganon/Archive 5

Re: Post-War Balkans
Hey, LG, I really like the maps, they really came out well. My only concern is the extent to which Bosnia has expanded, it appears as though they seemed to draw into a lot of Serbia land, which I didn't expect. Of course I'm a bit of a perfectionist so it may just be that I don't like the irregular shape. Anyway, now that the war part is over, I will get around to writing in about it on the Macedonia page. If there's anything left to do just message me.

- Ownerzmcown (talk) 16:58, August 25, 2012 (UTC)

Alternate Location for the Protestant Reformation
Would it be plausible for the Protestant Reformation to begin anywhere other than Northern Germany and Switzerland? This is for PMII, and the nations I was wondering about were Are any of these locations plausible? I know that this event would be 50 years away or more in-game, but I am assuming that it would be unlikely for the political landscape in Europe to change drastically during that time to be significantly different from OTL (other than perhaps a Scottish presence on Ireland, a less unified France, or the Ottomans having conquered less of the Balkans than in OTL) LurkerLordB (Talk) 02:08, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hungary
 * Bohemia (perhaps as a revival of Hussitism)
 * The Dutch/Frisian areas
 * (probably northern) France
 * England
 * Scotland
 * Ireland
 * Anywhere on the Balkan side of the Adriatic coast

In the game, currently, I am seeing the most likely cause for the beginning to be a rejection of the massive church taxes. Considering that the Papal states in this game have actually gone to war with another nation, I imagine that they are going to need a much greater source of money. Thus, the idea of a monarch refusing to fund the war seems to be likely. I'll be able to give a better picture in a couple weeks though. LurkerLordB (Talk) 22:59, September 13, 2012 (UTC)

OK: here's the situation: It is 1466, and Scotland is invading Ireland. The English, who want Ireland all to themselves, bring up an ancient old Papal bull and say they have the sole rights to invade Ireland to crush some heretics there. This convinces the Pope to start sending supplies to those heretics to help them resist the invasion of the Scottish. Would Scotland breaking away from the Catholic Church in response to this hypocritical action of the Pope be realistic at this time? LurkerLordB (Talk) 00:16, September 21, 2012 (UTC)

A Soviet Axis
I have another idea about a Soviet Axis. I did a bit of research, and it seems that most of Hitler’s generals wanted to go through N. Belgium, not the Ardennes. What if Hitler listened to those generals and went that way? They would meet high numbers of Allied troops, and could potentially cause a stalemate. Additional troops would pour in from other parts of France and UK, and we could have another WW1 type situation in Belgium or River Somme. Could you check the Timeline again? Thanks. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 20:52, September 19, 2012 (UTC)

Also, is an invasion of Switzerland really not going to happen? I found this on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Tannenbaum

PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 21:39, September 19, 2012 (UTC)

Alright, I suppose that's not plausible. But I saw that Belgian intelligence had figured out Germany would attack through the Ardennes region, and would use paratroopers to go behind the lines. But the Allies didn't listen. What if they had listened?

"In the winter of 1939–1940, the Belgian consul-general in Cologne had anticipated the angle of advance that Von Manstein was planning. Through intelligence reports, they deduced that German forces were concentrating along the Belgian and Luxembourg frontiers. The Belgians were convinced that the Germans would thrust through the Ardennes and to the English Channel with the aim of cutting off the Allied field Armies in Belgium and north-eastern France. They also anticipated that the Germans would try to land airborne and glider forces behind the Allied lines to break open Belgian fortifications. Such warnings were not heeded by the French, or British."

"On March 1940, Swiss intelligence detected six or seven Panzer Divisions on the German-Luxembourg-Belgian border. More motorized divisions had also been detected in the area. French intelligence were informed that the Germans were constructing pontoon bridges partially—about halfway—over the Our River on the Luxembourg-German border[citation needed] through aerial reconnaissance. The French military attaché in the Swiss capital—Berne—warned that the centre of the German assault would come on the Meuse at Sedan, sometime between 8 and 10 May. The report was dated 30 April. These reports had little effect on Gamelin."

Also, the reason the BEF/French forces were forced to evacuate at Dunkirk was because they were surrounded and cut off after German forces invaded France. If Allied forces hadn't rushed into Belgium, couldn't they have slowed down the German invasion?

Thanks. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 19:48, September 21, 2012 (UTC)

Also, and yet, Wikipedia says otherwise. It says Manstein’s plan “provoked a storm of protest from the majority of German generals.” (Battle of France, “Adoption of Manstein’s Plan”). Even though Hitler liked his idea, if Manstein had never come to Hitler’s attention, the attack would have gone into Belgium. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 22:41, September 21, 2012 (UTC)

Alright then, if Chamberlain had not appeased Hitler, and stood up to him, could the war have been delayed for another 5-6 months? If then, the entire invasion of France/the Low Countries could have bogged down. Thoughts? PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 00:31, September 23, 2012 (UTC)

Then if the war started in Czechoslovakia, how would the war have gone? There is, obviously, no way for Britain or France to help. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 19:46, October 1, 2012 (UTC)

Also, if Operation Pike had been moved up before the invasion of the Soviet Union, could that have led to war between the USSR and the Allies, thus leading them making an unholy alliance with the Germans? Thanks. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 19:07, October 2, 2012 (UTC)

Oh. That's true. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 22:48, October 2, 2012 (UTC)

Then is there any way the invasion of Poland or Germany could have been postponed one year, leading to OP? PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 22:49, October 2, 2012 (UTC)

Alright, I suppose conflict between Germany and the USSR is inevitable? I think there might be other ways out there, but in case there is really 0 percent probability, what would you say is the best name for the TL? Assuming, of course, that we are going under "no appeasement". PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 22:56, October 2, 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm. Any ideas on that? PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 23:19, October 2, 2012 (UTC)

Dammit I was going to rename it Fall Grün... until I realized there was already a featured TL with that same name. Grr. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 19:19, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

For the name, how about “Chamberlain Grows a Backbone”? Lol. But more seriously, how about Munich Agreement Failure? Although I like “A Soviet Axis” better :( PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 20:12, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Or maybe even Case Green, although that is kind of a “copy” of Fall Grün. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 20:13, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Maybe Chamberlain receives false information that the Germans are under prepared and will not invade Czechoslovakia, and thus gains the courage to stand up to Hitler. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 21:01, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

Is this a good PoD?
 * In 1937, fearing Nazi aggression, the British Secret Intelligence Service managed to recruit an agent in the Nazi Party, who was only known as his code name SONGBIRD. He was a personal aide of Albert Speer. SONGBIRD gave highly accurate information regarding the Nazis and their logistical capabilities, as well as their current stocks of food, weapons, and other supplies. However, in 1938, he sent false information regarding current weapon stocks, which lead to Neville Chamberlain believing that the Wehrmacht is not ready to invade Czechoslovakia in 1938, and will stand down. Due to these, he does not choose the policy of appeasing Hitler, and instead commits British support in case of a German invasion of Czechoslovakia. Hitler invades anyway, and the German army becomes bogged down in Czechoslovakia.

PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 19:57, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

How about this revised PoD: PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 21:02, October 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * In 1932, Hans Oster, an officer of the German Army, does not get into trouble and is not forced to resign. Due to this, he rises and eventually ends up on General Staff prior to the German takeover of Czechoslovakia. After hearing Hitler's plans, Oster went to the British, where he volunteered to be a spy. He was soon code-named SONGBIRD. Oster gave highly accurate information regarding the Nazis and their logistical capabilities, as well as their current stocks of food, weapons and other supplies. However, just before the Munich Agreement in 1938, he accidentally sent false information regarding current weapon stocks, which led Neville Chamberlain to believe that the Wehrmacht is not ready to invade Czechoslovakia in 1938, and would stand down. Due to these, he does not choose the policy of appeasing Hitler, and instead commits British support in case of a German invasion of Czechoslovakia. Hitler invades anyway, and the German army becomes bogged down in Czechoslovakia.

Which is why I chose Oster. In fact, he actually apparently told his friend in the Netherlands when the invasion date of the Low Countries would be, hoping they could delay the Germans. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 21:20, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

'Nother revised Pod? PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 23:43, October 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * In 1932, Hans Oster, an officer of the German Army, does not get into an affair with his commanding officer’s wife and is not forced to resign. Due to this, he rises and eventually ends up on General Staff prior to the German takeover of Czechoslovakia. In 1938, during Krystalnacht, his 17 year old daughter Barbara was raped and murdered by drunken Nazis. He became furious at the Nazis-however, in order to keep his life, he kept that a secret. Later that year, after hearing Hitler's plans, Oster went to the British, where he volunteered to be a spy. He was soon code-named SONGBIRD. Oster gave highly accurate information regarding the Nazis and their logistical capabilities, as well as their current stocks of food, weapons and other supplies. However, just before the Munich Agreement in 1938, he accidentally sent false information regarding current weapon stocks, which led Neville Chamberlain to believe that the Wehrmacht is not ready to invade Czechoslovakia in 1938, and would stand down. Due to these, he does not choose the policy of appeasing Hitler, and instead commits British support in case of a German invasion of Czechoslovakia. Hitler invades anyway, and the German army becomes bogged down in Czechoslovakia.

If he had not ended up on the General Staff, would he still have been able to get that information? Thanks. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 18:57, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Also, he had a daughter Barbara who would have been 17 during Krystalnacht. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 18:58, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Anyhow, I have a finalized PoD, how is it? PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 19:44, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

I have another revised PoD, will you look at it? Thanks. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 20:16, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, revised PoD and revised name at: Hans Oster, the Good Nazi. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 23:30, October 15, 2012 (UTC)

Fack! Any suggestions to the name? PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 19:52, October 17, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, although I liked the "Good Nazi" name :( Obviously based off of Albert Speer, the Good Nazi. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 00:00, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

King and Queen
LG, I just thought of the most insane thing: What would have happened if Princess Charlotte (who was Princess of Wales), became the Queen and married William, Prince of the Netherlands? What would have happened between the two nations? Syngraféas Enallaktikí̱ Istoría, Dic mihi lingua Anglorum. 02:02, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

OK, I get it now.

Lol, Victoria and Albert for Belgium. Makes some sense. Yes! Belgium's time of greatness! Forget Congo, let's take all of Southern Africa and Flanders and the BeNeLux! Victory for Belgium! Victory for waffles! Down with pancakes! XD, yes a mighty Belgium would make quite a ridiculous story.

Syngraféas Enallaktikí̱ Istoría, Dic mihi lingua Anglorum. 02:23, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

Couldn't have said it better, mate. Completely true on that point. Syngraféas Enallaktikí̱ Istoría, Dic mihi lingua Anglorum. 02:38, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

Greenland (1983:DD)
I must admit that I have been out of the loop much of the summer. To top it off, I don't seem to get email alerts when the main talk page of 1983:DD is altered. My mind being elsewhere, I don't think to check there or even wiki-wide posts for that matter.

I say this to perhaps remove the suspicion you might have for my recent reversion of the Greenland stub back to fx's work which you put up for review and then changed after the review was "over." It is not that your arguments were unsound, but rather because you do not seem to have contacted fxgentleman during the review period. If you wish to put the article back under review after notification, I support that move, but I respectfully ask that you do not get into an editing war over this. SouthWriter (talk) 20:52, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

I honestly do not believe you read your talk page, Ganon. Otherwise, your reaction to the revert is explicable. Of course it was a "Community Review," but with no input from the caretaker of the article at all. It is somewhat suspicious that you chose a period when fx is not active to pick on a stub -- not even a full fledged page -- that he had produced and had accepted. Common courtesy would call for at least some feed back from him. I am in a hard place here, Ganon, since it seems only you and I are active in the top tier -- you a lot more than me. I have no choice but to sometimes contradict you. As I point out above, I see no problem in you changing things. It is the way you change things that is a problem. I cannot change you, so I must at times stand against you. --SouthWriter (talk) 04:34, October 5, 2012 (UTC)

Questions
1) What if Mark Antony had not by defeated at Actium but instead had won, perhaps even killing Octavian and Agrippa when their ship(s) were accidently rammed by friendly ships even the attempts to flee?

2) What if Julius Caesar had been warned of the Senator's plot and escaped being killed by the Senators?

3) What if Julius Caesar had never been born?

4) What if St.Paul had gone on mission trips to the East intstead of to the West for whatever reason (God, fear of death, etc.) and St.Thomas had preached to the West?

5) What if Julius Caesar, when he was fleeing Alexandria he had been delayed for several minutes and was killed by Arsinoe's forces?

Bobalugee1940 (talk) 00:40, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Stub
I'm sorry if I sound stupid, but you've reverted most of my stub edits on pages. I just want to know, then, what constitutes a stub. Thanks! PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 20:37, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Alright, I suppose I'll be more thoughtful next time when I attach the category. PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 21:05, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Re:RA Notes
Greetings. Speak of the Devil, I was hoping to get your opinion here, and you beat me to it. Glad you like it, and glad it all came out right. If at all possible, I just wanted to clarify an idea I thought of after reading your comments. What of a 1905-like revolution taking place later on (prior to WWI), and allowing the timeline to sync with 1917 and so on. But I am pretty sure this won't work, so ignore me if it is a bad idea.

I will have to do more reading about the revolution and the civil war, but how different do you mean? Bloodier and longer... would this have any affect towards the formation of the USSR (or even a similar outcome)?

I wasn't aware that the Five Races flag was unpopular (would explain why it isn't used today). But, I don't see any other choice, and I personally like the design (original, identifiable, and simple). My argument would compare this to how Germans weren't too fond of the black-red-gold tricolor, but after Nazi rule (and the Allies doing what they wanted), the tricolor remained. I would see this being the same, especially since Japan would help reestablish a monarchy in China after WWII, and not for the fact that this flag was used multiple times by the Japanese OTL (just look at the flags for and the ).

As for Afghanistan and Persia, no need to worry. I already looked into them and agree that there would be no difference.

Thank you again. Glad you like the idea. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 22:47, October 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your input. I believe I can work from here. It also may work out for how I have envisioned Alaska being a "White haven," but I need to work on it.


 * I am rather upset that this flag was actually hated (it was quite clever IMHO). But since I see being appointed Emperor, I guess using the Qing flag isn't a bad idea. It would also make sense why EVERYBODY uses it, lol.


 * Also, because I noticed you added a new category, how is Valkyrie Rides biased? (or ASB for that matter?) I didn't see anything wrong with it? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:00, October 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * I just thought of something that I would love to get your two cents on. What if Alexander II wasn't assassinated? Russia would have transformed into a (somewhat) constitutional monarchy. I was thinking this could lead to a 1905-like reform, and allowing the revolutions and civil war to be (more or less) the same. What do you think? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:45, October 9, 2012 (UTC)

1983: Doomsday
I couldn't find my original message, so I've restarted it.

Do you know of any improtant post-doomsday cities that aren't claimed yet (worldwide?)

In North America, I'd prefer a central-eastern region, somewhere where's there's room to thrive.

I don't suppose any Pacific or Caribbean islands are available?

Anywhere in the former Congo?

Oh, and by the way, you might want to rename Nanchung to Nanchang and relocate it south of the Dragon State, or whoever made the latest map.

Canuck2012 (talk) 01:48, October 10, 2012 (UTC)Canuck2012

I meant for the map-it still shows Nanchang as being in the west near Sichuan, when it should be south of the Dragon State. There's no such city as Nanchung, only Nanchang, which is in the former province the Dragon State is in.

Canuck2012 (talk) 19:38, October 10, 2012 (UTC)Canuck2012

EoGuy
What do you think about making him a part of the TSPTF because of his simply amazing copyediting work over the past few months? I know that it's supposed to be a year, but I think we can make an exception in this case. Thoughts? PitaKang- (But here's my number | So call me maybe) 00:38, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Edits
Damn, I meant to do this the day it happened, then completely forgot...

But, hey, happy (very belated) 50,000 edits!

even though I am some 2,500 edits late...

The Royal Guns (talk) 18:36, October 14, 2012 (UTC)

Questions
1) What if Oliver Cromwell had become King/Emperor/etc. of England, maybe absolute or not; also what is a possible POD for him becoming a monarch

2) What if the royalist won the English Civil War?

3) What if Frederick the Great had children?

4) What if Richard Cromwell had not been incompetent and was able to rule a republican England?

5) What if Zwingli had not died at the Battle of Kappel but instead had survived and fled to either Poland or the Balkans or Scotland?

Bobalugee1940 (talk) 19:27, October 14, 2012 (UTC)

Well, it's based on game so I can't really write everything about that. It was meant to be only about one war. Also, I'm here only one day, so stuff about "no interest in improving" sounds just - sorry - funny. Chillax mate.

If it's wrong to write only about conflict or add stuff everyday, well - there's nothing much I can do about that. Delete if you wish, or if there is no other way.

Anjin Miura (talk) 08:46, October 17, 2012 (UTC)

Grammer vs. Gomez
It occurred to me that Kelsey Grammer of Frasier fame is, in OTL, a registered and proud Republican. Maybe he ought to be the running mate of Brian Williams in Napoleon's World as a conservative counterweight on the National Party ticket instead of the fictional Alex Gomez? He could be the Senator of Florida (where he grew up), for example. What do you think?

KingSweden (talk) 05:05, October 23, 2012 (UTC)

True true, specially since the National Party is more Rockefeller Republican than Tea Party in ATL. OR I could just make Grammer not be a tea partier in his convictions, since I neither Robert Redford, Brian Williams nor Steve Martin are known for being conservatives (particularly Redford) yet in NW they are all part of the National Party.

KingSweden (talk) 17:41, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

I think I'll just make Grammer the Senate Majority Leader.

KingSweden (talk) 00:22, October 29, 2012 (UTC)

Ugh yeah I know I should. How do I do that?

KingSweden (talk) 03:26, October 30, 2012 (UTC)

A Bunraku Sock?
Hey LG, long time no talk. Anyways, I just wanted to bring something to your attention. We have two users (mapgamers really), this guy and this other person, that claim to be brother and sister. However, this whole brother and sister thing really seems to be working out for them, and they're practically allied in most of their map games in common. Call me too presumptive, but do I smell a dirty sock? Or is it a puppet? I hope you catch my wind.

Hasta la vista, baby. (I'll be back.) 01:41, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Hey there. Just thought I'd drop you a line and ask why you took out the changes I made to the "Japanese Victory" page? Vexacus

I do not want to REMOVE anything from it, I want to ADD to it. I;m hoping to adopt the TL

I do not want to break any of the wiki's rules. I do not intend to REMOVE anything from the "Japanese Victory" page, rather I want to add to the start and expand beyond what was originally written. I hope to adopt the page

Vexacus

OK, thank-you for explaining that. And if yhou undo my edits, will I be able to undo your undo if I am allowed to adopt the page?

Vexacus

Prussian Generals
Hey LG. How are you? I was hoping you could provide a list of Generals in the Prussian, Spanish, and Austrian Armies during the Napoleonic Wars. I've been looking everywhere and I ownly found a few, most of them notable. Enclavehunter (talk) 23:15, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Ok, thank-you for explaining that to me. I have copied down all the changes I had made and have a list of changes I hope to make if I am allowed to adopt the page. So my fingers, toes any anything else that can be is crossed

Vexacus

Continental Association
What I was thinking several scenarios that would change the American Revolution, all PODs occuring before the continental association.

1) What if the Catholic Quebecois continued the war against the British as Francs-tireurs causing them to be more and more repressed until they eventually go into full open revolt against the British, possibly with the help of the more southern British Colonies.

2) What if the Spanish did not leave in a mass exodus from Florida after the French and Indian War but instead the Spanish crown thought it would be to expensive, or really anything that would stop them from leaving after the war, and the many Spanish Catholics stayed there. Afterwards the similar concessions made to Quebec did not occur and when invited to revolt against the Protestant, repressing, spiteful British they took their chances and joined.

3) What if East and/or West Florida joined the revolution by some other means (use whatever POD you can dream up)

4) What if the Continental Association also imeadiatley banned exports to Britian, thus hurting their economy and supply of wood, food, and unproduced goods. This causes the British to start the revolution earlier, maybe February 1775 or earlier with a battle against the colonial militia. Or perhaps whatever else this effect would have on the revolution.

Bobalugee1940 (talk) 01:27, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

you got a min?
anon user  150.203.223.120  blanked my talk page would you or another admin take care of them for me?

thanks in advance.

Wingman1 05:31, October 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * Someone reverted the vandalism. I blocked the user for 6 months. Hope that is alright. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:03, October 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * yea it's good now. thanks.[[Image:Temp.png|30px]] Wingman1 18:23, October 27, 2012 (UTC)

Quick concept
Greetings, LG. I would like to get your two cents on an idea I just read about. I'm sure you remember that in Russian America, Germany would become divided. So let's assume early on (since all the powers pretty much did), Germany was going to be permanently divided (not temporarily occupied). With that, wouldn't it make more sense for most of the (the parts of Germany that now make up western Poland) to remain in any rump state?

I came across this idea here, and it does make some sense. However, I would like to get your two cents on this before I go any further. For the record, I would intend for southern East Prussia, Danzig, and Upper Silesia to go to Poland. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:10, October 27, 2012 (UTC)

I am glad to help, and I am glad that I didn't go too far on that block.

I am rather confused? I thought you were in favor of a divided Germany (regardless), now you want what happened OTL? If anything, I know where you are (I am loosing interest in this idea myself).

But trying to look at all possibilities, I have one idea that I would like to explore, and would like a second opinion on. Poland is annexed into the Soviet Union after WWII. My reasoning for this would be that (like the Baltic States), Poland was once part of the Soviet Union; and since the Soviets would also annex Mongolia and Uyghuristan ATL, Poland could be interesting. I have read mostly negative opinions on this idea, but considering how different RA is, it might have a better chance here. Along with which, this Polish SSR would not include any part of Germany (obviously excluding Danzig, East Prussia, and Upper Silesia). The remaining parts of the Recovered Territory would remain part of the Soviet-backed Prussia, since there would be no need to add more Germans to the USSR (and possibly as a way for the West to accept a Polish SSR). Since it would be technically part of the USSR, all of East Prussia (including Kaliningrad) would become part of Poland (if not right away, then later [since Russia offered the port to Lithuania later on]), and maybe Lvov would be given to Poland as a sign of good hope. Either way, Poland would become independent around 1991, and may follow the Baltic States towards being anti-Soviet.

And if this is a stupid idea, what would be your take on the ? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 00:30, October 31, 2012 (UTC)

Adoption of Timeline
My Lord, it is permissible for me for adopting the OFA Chinese Empire timeline and change its basic idea to create a second version of my Myomi Republic timeline? FirstStooge (talk) 07:27, October 28, 2012 (UTC)

This comming Tuesday will be the 1-week I need to wait after PM-ing the original owner of the "Japanese Victory" Page that I&apos;m hoping to be able to adopt. On Tuesday afternoon, I will procede to Stage 2 of the adoption process. I just thought I would let you know in advance so that when I put the Adoption Aplication notice on the page, it does not get edited out

Vexacus 15:02GMT, October 28, 2012 (UTC)

I have left the notice at the top of the page, now all I have to do is wait three days

Vexacus

I have left a note on the talk page. Sorry for the confusion in placing it on the wrong page. I take it the three days has been reset and I now have to wait until Saturday to find out if I can adopt it?

Vexacus (talk) 12:16, October 31, 2012 (UTC)

Then I look forward to Saturday and the reset 3-day waiting period has given me the chance to find some pictures I&apos;ll be posting, if I am able to adopt the TLVexacus (talk) 11:35, November 1, 2012 (UTC)

2012: Doomsday
Lordgano can you please delete my 2012:Doomsday Page (or Random Doomsday because SOMEONE moved it without CONSULTING me first.) because I've decided to make another 2012:Doomsday page not based on a modern version of 1983:Doomsday but what the mayans said that the world would end this year (but prob won't).

Thank You - User:Lewody1 11:39 GMT 01/11/2012

In anticipation of being allowed to adopt the "Japanese Victory" page, I was hoping I could ask your advice. I have written a good deal that takes place before the first date on the page, I have also re-written a lot of what has already been posted and I have several pages worth of stuff to take place after the last post. My question is should I re-post it in chunks or in one fo, what do you think?Vexacus (talk) 13:54, November 1, 2012 (UTC)

In chunks it is. And I'm glad to here it is the wiki axcting funky and not my PC (^_^) Vexacus (talk) 09:57, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

I'm not copying films
Actually Lordganon. I haven't seen the 2012 Movie but I've heard about it so if my timeline has got something similar with the film then i'm sorry but i'm not copying it - User:Lewody1 10:45 GMT 02/11/12

Adoption Question
If I am indeed allowed to adopt the "Japanese Victory" page, what happens? Is a notice posted on the page lettign people know or do I get told I've adopted it via my talk page?

Vexacus (talk) 20:33, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Strange Occurance
Hey LG, it's me again. Scraw. Now see here, something strange just happened to me. I was using my uncle's Mac, you see, and I just received a notice in the bottom right hand corner of the page I had just edited saying that I had made the Lucky Edit. As I've mentioned in the past, I know these exist, but I never get them. (The notice, that is.) Curious, I clicked at the bottom that notice that said "See what other badges you can earn!" That led me to my userpage.

You may or may not know this, but I was #4 on the wiki. My userpage now tells me that I am number 12 and that I have lost 990 points.

But, my drop-down list shows all my 72 badges. Apparently, 71 badges had added up to 4300 points. 72 adds up to 3590 points.

Now the big question here is, how?

Hasta la vista, baby. (I'll be back.) 21:32, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

OK. Thanks.

Hasta la vista, baby. (I'll be back.) 16:12, November 3, 2012 (UTC)

Message Left
I have left that message on the talk page and will nowe undo the changes you undid, ok? Vexacus (talk) 15:10, November 3, 2012 (UTC)

Text Problem
Can you help me, I need to know the font originally used on the "Japanese Victory" page, but when I copy and past it, it says Helvetica, but when I paste a new section in, it does not match the font originally used

Vexacus (talk) 21:49, November 3, 2012 (UTC)

'''The Anti-Piracy League page is tied to Principia Moderni II. It's my fault, i forgot to put in the proper labeling. Please remove the deletion notice, since it was fixed by Scandinator.AP (talk) 07:13, November 7, 2012 (UTC)'''

??What Font??
Since you said the fonty I have used at the start of the "Japanese Victory" TL looks horrible, what font would you recomend?Vexacus (talk) 10:10, November 7, 2012 (UTC)

More Wiki Problems?
I take it there are more Wiki problems as when I went to check on a badge I am working towards, it now shows the earliest badges I gotVexacus (talk) 11:05, November 7, 2012 (UTC)

Hello Lordganon. I would like to apologize to you about my behavior a couple months ago. If you recall, I made an article called "Brave New World", which was hastily moved to the Future Wiki and it has now become one of the more successful projects there. Anyways, you contacted me and gave me some info about moving it, and shortly after, I asked a couple questions regarding adding gun articles to the 1983: Doomsday timeline (which I got to say is a marvelous piece of work). In response, you told me that I would not be capable of doing such a thing, as I would be "stepping on the toes of others". My reply to you was less than friendly, and accused you of patronizing me, which was a mistake on my part. I was going through a rough time during the times of those posts and my mood was more... foul than usual. Now that I have explained myself, I would like to say sorry for the behavior that I displayed to you. Hopefully when the time comes, I would like to participate in the 1983: Doomsday project and become a prominent althist writer here, as the entire idea of it is fascinating to me. In the near future, I will contact you or someone else regarding the editorial directives.

Thanks! XtranormalGeek 23:47, November 7, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks LG. I do the best as i can. :) Regards Katholico (talk) 03:53, November 8, 2012 (UTC)

Adoption Question
I have left a message on the talk page of the user who created the "Japanese Victory at Midway" page, he is tghe same one who created the "Japanese Victory" page whicvh I adopted. If he does not respond withion a week and if no one objects after the three-day waiting period after I have posted my intentions to adopt the page, would I be allowed to remove the page and use it on the "Japanese Victory" page as some of it would fit in very well Vexacus (talk) 12:51, November 8, 2012 (UTC)

Barack Obama in Nelson's Death
Hey LG. I was wondering if you could answer a quick question:

Would Barack Obama exist in my ATL: Nelson's Death, should the French own Kenya, and thus Obama's father living in a French Kenya instaed of a British Kenya?

Enclavehunter (talk) 23:33, November 8, 2012 (UTC)

Questions Regarding my ATL
Hi, I recently saw that you've labelled my ATL under the categories "Time Travel", "Biased", and "Random".... I was wondering if you could explain to me how this ATL is biased even though I haven't really expanded my timeline yet.... Also, does being included in these categories indicate that this ATL is an unreasonable and faulty ATL? I really want to write a good ATL about the Ming Dynasty during the Chongzhen period, but I couldnt find a good enough POD, please help me!

P.S. Why isn't "Aetas ab Brian" included in the "Time Travel" category? It has 2 people time-travelling after all....

Black Prince of Britannia (talk) 18:03, November 9, 2012 (UTC)Black Prince of Britannia

Perhaps I am being simply annoying and wasting your time, but according to my understandings, in the page "List of PODs", "Aetas ab Brian" clearly states that an Egyptian man fell through time to Ptolemiac Egypt. Also, if you read the descriptions of Carico, you would find that his god-like abilities to create wooden planes, steam engines, and even to go to the extent of adopting Jesus (Jeff Brian, but this is only according to my understandings) could only indicate time-travelling...

Also, if you do have time, I was wondering if you could re-evaluate my ATL after I've finished expanding it.

Thank You! XD

207.6.254.79 03:07, November 11, 2012 (UTC)Black Prince of Britannia

I am really persistent, so for God's sake, please read the following pages...

http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Hyperabridgement_(%C3%86tas_ab_Brian)

http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Roman_timeline_of_invention_(%C3%86tas_ab_Brian)

http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Cruuxius_Tiberius_Carico_(%C3%86tas_ab_Brian)

If that still does not prove my point (I have no intention of antagonizing the author of "Aetas ab Brian" nor anyone, including you because of this. I'm simply trying to make my point.) Then I believe that I need to get examined for reading-disabilities...

Black Prince of Britannia (talk) 23:17, November 11, 2012 (UTC)Black Prince of Britannia

K, it seems that I'm wrong.... But still, how would you explain the inventions and the genius of Carico? Anyways, it still seems to me to be sort of a "wank" but I shall not press this matter anymore.

Thank you for your help though!

Black Prince of Britannia (talk) 22:57, November 12, 2012 (UTC)Black Prince of Britannia

Re:Russian America Far East
Glad you like the new map. Funny that you should mention it, because I was considering the possibilities. I guess it wouldn't be unreasonable for the Soviets to demand more from China. My only questions about would be how much? For instance, Japan made an Inner Mongolia puppet state in the '30s, and it only comprised of about half of modern day Inner Mongolia (also including the territory that was part of Manchuria).

Since we are discussing a Greater Mongolia, what about a Greater Tibet? I don't know what constituted Tibet prior to the modern-day border, but what would you think about the British demanding more? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 18:06, November 11, 2012 (UTC)


 * That's why there's two Mongolias? Doesn't surprise me, but interesting to know. I have made an updated map if you are interested.


 * Since I have your attention, I was wondering if I could get your two cents on another idea I have been thinking about for weeks now. I have been seeing this idea being used a lot lately, and it seems plausible for RA as well. During the Russo-Spanish War (which Russia also offered aid to Mexico), the Russians further stress the Spanish out by going after the Philippines (which was also going through anti-Spanish rebellion). After winning the war, Russia would also demand the islands as part of their winnings. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 23:52, November 12, 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry for bringing this up on this conversation, but I wanted to get you opinion on something else I've been wanting to do for a while. My sandbox has become more of a directory than a testing ground. I have been considering dividing my sandbox into several separate pages (each related to a specific timeline). I am not sure if this would go against any rules or anything (probably not because there are a lot of pages just for "Mexico"), but it wouldn't hurt to bring it up before I do so. Thank you again. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 01:30, November 14, 2012 (UTC)

Sterling Awards 2012
Greetings LG! I have a question related to this/next years Sterling Awards, and when they will start and what the plan is. I'm asking now becuase Mitro is wondering if it will be possible for me to cover them on his History Weekly Update blog once they do get started. I know we were throwing out ideas last year about how to change the awards around, so I was just coming to you to see if you have any definite changes taking place.

If you can give me some heads up so I can cover it/report on it, please let me know so I can plan ahead.

Thanks! Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 16:32, November 12, 2012 (UTC)


 * Alright, thanks for the heads up. I'll most likely just list the nominations on the blog when we start the voting, and provide links to said nominations. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 05:10, November 14, 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppet alert:
Sockpuppet alert:

This IP, 165.138.65.253, is controlling several nations using different names in Axis vs. Allies Revolutions.

Fegelein! Fegelein! Fegelein! 00:47, November 13, 2012 (UTC)

Lafayette
I was reading about Lafayette and I was wondering what would have happened if he had accepted the Dictatorship of France instead of allowing Louis-Phillipe to become King?

I was thinking that after becoming Dictator he could have wrote a new constitution much like the OTL July Monarchy accept he and his descendants was King.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilbert_du_Motier,_marquis_de_Lafayette#Accession_of_Louis-Philippe

Bobalugee1940 (talk) 00:04, November 16, 2012 (UTC)

Adoption Notice
I messaged the creator of the "Japanese Victory at Midway" page a week ago and I have not heard from him, therefore I am letting you know that I have oput up an adoption notice on the talk page for the "Japanese Victory at Midway" TL Vexacus (talk) 23:58, November 16, 2012 (UTC)

How?
How am I violating the rules?Homesun (talk) 14:03, November 18, 2012 (UTC)

Please delete
Can you delete all the pages related to North American Democracy except the NAD page itself, I want to start this over and not make it as 'stupid'. Looking back at the pages I see they are totally unrealistic and mostly stupid like "He was Prime Minister and elected president" I was less politically knowing so i want a fresh start. Marcus/Michael Villanova 13:53, November 22, 2012 (UTC)

But leave the North Continential Relations, George Bush and Texan related pages. There is nothing wrong with those ~ Marcus/Michael Villanova 13:57, November 22, 2012 (UTC)

Actualy delete everything related to NAD, i'm starting a new one so its a fresh start and with different aspects. Marcus/Michael Villanova 21:55, November 22, 2012 (UTC)

THANKS :DDDD!!! Umm my new althistory is New America sorta like the last one but "better" more full. I know you were good with giving capitals. Can you see the map on the New America page and give a list of capitals for each nation? Thanks Marcus/Michael Villanova 02:06, November 24, 2012 (UTC)

Congressman Milk
I'm not sure why you decided to revert the edits I did. I moved them to a timeline page at Timeline (Congressman Milk),which was also deleted. Do you care to explain this?


 * Maybe you didn't read what I wrote here. I didn't remove anything. I moved them to another page. Also, the page Congressman Milk says that changes are welcome right on the page you edited. I didn't realize that there were pages that are not edited on that are shared by the community and that they only have one editor. I thought the Alt History was a good idea and was going to add more to it, but if that's not allowed I won't do it. Thanks for letting me know. --Pinkkeith (talk) 22:53, November 25, 2012 (UTC)

Hello
I thought I would report This to an admin. Make of it what you will. I am withholding judgement.

David Rain (Sometimes...) (talk)

Yes. Umm... wow. I noticed it too. David got here first, I guess. The Royal Guns (talk) 20:40, November 27, 2012 (UTC)

2012 Bowl Season College Football Pick'em
Its your favorite time of year again, LG. I always post this on your wall first, btw, since you've included your reasoning for each pick both times I've done it :)

NCAA Division I National Championship (Citrus Bowl)

1 Cuba (13-0) vs. 2 Texas (13-0)

Sugar Bowl

16 Kahokia (10-3) vs. 8 Texas A&M (11-1)

Manhattan Bowl 12 Iowa (10-2) vs. 13 Pittsburgh (10-2)

Rose Bowl

4 Washington (12-1) vs. 7 Ohio State (11-2)

Orange Bowl

13 San Diego (10-2) vs. 6 South Carolina (11-1)

Silver Bowl

18 Huron (9-3) vs. 3 Sequoyah (12-1)

Peach Bowl

14 Alabama (10-3) vs. 19 Virginia (9-4)

Texas Bowl

5 Pacifica (11-1) vs. 10 Massachusetts (10-2)

Chicago Bowl

11 Notre Dame (10-3) vs. 15 Louisiana (10-2)

Paradise Bowl

17 Fresno State (13-0) vs. 9 Peninsula (11-2)

KingSweden (talk) 01:58, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

I am sick of this
LG, I believe I have had enough of this. For the past year now, I continually receive comments discrediting my ideas and hard work. Now you have commented on how two of my ideas will not work, and now I have to remove them and this is upsetting for me. It has gotten to the point that I am now fearful of posting any new ideas on the grounds of getting comments that they are not workable. I do not wish for your help to end, I appreciate all the help I can get and I especially like to have my timelines correct; but now that weeks of hard work I have put into these ideas are now just pieces of trash, it has become a frustration and I am not sure how to take it. I am not sure how me informing you all of this will be of any help, but it is something I have to say. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 18:29, December 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * I really do apologize for my actions. It was uncalled for and I feel rotten for saying those things to a friend like you. I know that you are only trying to help out. But keep in mind that I did spends several weeks reading, contemplating, discussions, debates, and redrafting of my South America idea to the point that I thought it was workable; and all that work was gone in only a few paragraphs which stated that not one flaw, but several flaws. It was very overwhelming to know that I have screwed up again, and have to start from scratch. I was caught up in the moment, and I understand if you are mad at me. If at all possible, let us move forward.


 * As I mentioned above, I was more upset about South America rather than Italy (which was an idea I didn't explore to much beforehand). The overall reasoning for me exploring a divided Italy was because of Germany (and China) being "punished", while Italy (even OTL) was pretty much left alone, the fact that Italy was the closest western nation to willingly become communist, and that with the idea of Germany being purposely divided (meaning Berlin isn't), the Cold War looks rather weak in comparison with OTL. It had nothing to do with monarchies (I have begun to show more fascination with them lately, after all), but that you said a division was unlikely here, and that a communist state wouldn't work either way. So I have lost interest in this idea overall.


 * The South America idea I may bring back in some form or another (maybe as a Peru-Bolivian Dominion state as you suggested), but I believe I need a break and come back on a fresh mind. I have a couple of ideas I would like to look into, primarily General tiu's idea for Japan. But like I said, maybe I need a break, all of this is getting overcomplicated. So again, I do apologize for my actions, and I hope that you can forgive me. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 17:56, December 8, 2012 (UTC)

I never really considered Asia in that respect; aside from the obvious fact that the USSR and Japan would have nukes facing each other. While I am not too sure (not an expert), the Vietnam War would probably still happen (it began from the leaving French), but maybe there would be large numbers of Japanese fighting in the war.

I am well aware that the Ainu make up a low population, but I added Hokkaido as a "country" for other reasons besides ethnics:


 * Much like Korea and the others, Hokkaido (and the Kurils) were annexed by Japan (not part of the original home islands). Granted, Japan had more time and success in colonizing the region, Hokkaido still has an "otherness" mentality even to this day (not as great as [say] Texas, but enough that this may be looked into upon reformation ATL).


 * Despite being an empire of "countries" (still not sure on a name), Japan would be a unitary state (much like the UK), which would all be "Japanese" by the time I am considering the empire to reform. In short, Japan divided for regional and historic say, not so much ethnics.

But it is still a work in progress, and I have not gotten any response by Tiu to help me along. So one step at a time. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 18:26, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

Kingdom of Quebec (French America)
Whay did you undo my modifications? What does 3,854,085 sq mi km2 mean? What are natinos?

205.151.119.83 13:02, December 7, 2012 (UTC)

Spokane in 1983:DD
How did Spokane survive the nuclear attack on Fairchild AFB? Downtown Spokane (where I work) is less than a ten minute drive from the base, and back in 1983 areas north of the city like Mead or east like Spokane Valley were less built-out from suburbanization (though they did exist). The only plausible explanation I can come up with for this is that Fairchild is at a much higher elevation than the city (which is down along a river valley) and thus the city was partially shielded from the blast, though no doubt still heavily damaged. I know the Spokane junta is canon, but there should probably be a plausible explanation for the city's survival.

KingSweden (talk) 06:38, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

Sounds pretty reasonable. I assume then that the nukes fired at Seattle and Tacoma were higher MT than the Spokane one?

KingSweden (talk) 23:52, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

New Apoc:2012 page nominated for deletion
Hey Lordganon, I had just created the page Weather During The Apocalypse (Apocalypse: 2012) (which will likely be renamed and has a hell of a lot of data to be put in) when a user named Cartoon1 nominated the article for deletion. He did not explain why on the talk page. I'm not sure how to proceed as I have no idea if he is a Wikia official or a troll. Could you please help? Thank you, Scandinator (talk) 13:59, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of page
My page was nominated for deletion and I was wondering if there would be anything I can do to improve it so it doesn't get deleted --ProudAmerican1776 (talk) 18:19, December 9, 2012 (UTC)Proud1776

Question
Hey, I was looking through the Doomsday articles, and noticed that many of the nations such as Japan and Korea, and most of the port-war American nations, were sitting on top of or around sites that were nuked. Is this allowed? If so, could I base my nation around such areas, or provide some details as to how they survived (such as Japan and Israel shooting down many of the missiles)? Vivaporius says: "I don't need a slogan!" 20:48, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

Doomsday advice
Hey LG, I was wondering if I could get your advice on how I should bring up a suggestion in the Doomsday timeline (since the talk page looks quite complicated). I wanted to bring up a proposal I have been meaning to bring to the tables for a long time now, but I would also like to get your two cents on the matter before I go any further.

I do not know if you recall this idea I brought up in the discussions of ' and ', but I have been pondering the idea of the Outer Lands being divided between and a Long Island/Block Island state. I am aware that I will have to bring this up with the respective users who are the admins the articles in question, but I would like to get a second opinion on this issue, and whether (site wise) this could be looked into. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 23:30, December 13, 2012 (UTC)


 * No need to worry, I completely understand. I need to get my act together as well (haven't been shopping yet). Anyway, I am glad that you approve the idea. However, you got it wrong. What I wanted to do is have Cape Cod, Martha's Vineyard, and Nantucket join Plymouth, with Long Island and Block Island becoming their own union (in affect, ending the Outer Lands). Not too sure what you would think of this.


 * I plan on informing the user in question in due time. I agree that Arstar would probably not refuse, but the other two I am not too sure of. I came across an old discussion on this same matter from years back, and Brian said he was supportive of this idea. I will ask again to be sure he still feels this way, but I believe this may work. Thank you again. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:27, December 15, 2012 (UTC)

So, another bad idea, eh? Well, it doesn't matter to much. However, why can't this be an issue that was already resolved? Why does it have to be a contemporary process in the timeline? If that is the case, then I honestly see no point in looking into this idea any further, and just keep the things the way they are. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 21:58, December 16, 2012 (UTC)

UPDATE: Just wanting to see this possibility. How would around the late '90s sound for Cape Cod peacefully leaving the Outer Lands in favor of a union with Plymouth. This could also correspond nicely with the date that Plymouth becomes a Commonwealth. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 23:36, December 17, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you again. Also, by "down the toilet," I was referring to my Long Island idea. Was rather interested in me having a Long Island being alone (with Block Island being a bonus), and allow Arstar to have his initial proposal in the process. But after more thinking, I do realize that just having them divide would be a waste of a great idea. They all have too many similarities to just divide, and historically; Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket were part of New York (but not Block Island for some reason). Also, I would believe that as an added bonus, Long Island would develop as the dominant member, especially if Cape Cod leaves.


 * As for a date, I would assume that 2008/9 may work out. I would hope this develops peacefully. I will have to work on the timeline a bit, but I will need to bring this up at the main talk page pretty soon. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:24, December 18, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you again. Also, I read your comment on the talk page for the OTL. I had no idea that there was an attack on Cape Cod. Aside from affecting the population (among other things), wouldn't this also make a wasteland between them and Plymouth? In short, would a unity movement be possible if this is the case? Also, why did you duplicate my map? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:51, December 19, 2012 (UTC)

So there are different types of attacks? Not too sure I see that. Granted, it could be argued that Otis only received one strike (as opposed to NYC), and that the wind direction at the time (southwest IIRC); but an attack is still an attack. Even a small one seems like it would have cut off Cape Cod and Plymouth for decades (as you stated before), and it appears that Cape Cod would be much smaller because of which.

Also, I have been having second thoughts about giving up Cape Cod, and am actually looking forward to just having it remain in the union. I have also brought this up with Brian, but maybe you know as well. I am just curious, do you guys remember why Plymouth got Provincetown?

So the map was made by the site? I guess that make some sense. However, I have been trying to remove duplicates from the site, and this upsets me (especially since it is a map I made). How long do you intend to have it remain here? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 18:52, December 20, 2012 (UTC)




 * I guess that makes sense. But given the clusterfuck that thee Soviets gave NYC, you can't blame me for thinking that the attack on Otis would be a bit larger.


 * I made a quick map showing the attacked area. It still feels like that the area west of Barnstable (the town) would be "off limits" for quite a while after DD (which is what I meant by it would be a long while to ignore any type of unification).


 * I figured as much about Provincetown. I just wanted to be sure there was a reason and not that it was an area Astarpool forgot to remove.


 * No need to worry, just wanted to check. I will remove in time. Yes, it is about done (or as done as it can get), and I do appreciate it that you would select it (now I need to get back towards that timeline).


 * Also, you recently reverted some of my edits over a template. Mind if I ask why? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 04:28, December 21, 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much. That simulator site is very interesting. However, which type of bombs were used?

I would like to add that there is no difference between those templates. Secondly, I do not really wish to have a huge template on the page which only states that it is a stub. It all leads to the same category. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:34, December 21, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the size. That map-site is really cool (can't wait to really have fun with it). However, I think using the Tsar Bomba on Otis would be interesting (lol).


 * No need to worry about it. I just find it funny how confused your reactions were to them.


 * I believe that is all I have on the Outer Lands so far (I plan on making a new map sometime soon). Now I am getting interested in another idea I have been contemplating for the past couple of days. I do warn you that this is a topic that I am passionate about (regardless of it being usable on this timeline), so if this is another case of me being too optimistic (which I really hope I am not), please be gentle about telling me. But given the timeline idea I have, and the interaction of the nations around the Outer Lands, I do believe that is is plausible. I would like to get your opinion on the issue before I go any further.


 * It involves the Shoreham Nuclear Plant on Long Island, and it being used to power Long Island. Aside from the cliche of using nuclear power after Doomsday, I do believe this is usable and workable for this timeline. I would love to get your opinion (though I am not too sure about your stances towards nuclear power). ^^; --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 05:38, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Now that is quite a site to see. Just off the top of my head, I thought of an interesting timeline idea. The POD is that the world actually ended on December 21, 2012. Imagine the possibilities. XD

I am glad that this idea is workable. Like I said before, I am rather passionate about this plant (I even went there a while back), so I am very happy I can include it. Off topic (somewhat), I came across an alternate history about the Shoreham plant, but it was stupid and meant to be funny.

But interesting that you said the world was becoming more nuclear. Now that might be an interesting article to add to the timeline, how nuclear power has become despite the world being doomed by their big brothers. Again, thank you. I may start the article tomorrow, at which time I will bring it up on the talk page. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 07:16, December 23, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you again. I guess what I meant about "increased use" is an overstatement, but you explained it pretty well yourself. I had no idea how elaborate nuclear power was in this timeline, and how "rushed" they are (as you said). This would make an interesting article. Also, I will be writing a report about a user who has been ignoring my messages. Just giving you a heads up. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 18:46, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Well all in good time. As for Sunlord, he hasn't been around lately, so maybe he gets the message (*he says before realizing he just jinxed it*). I also have no real idea what he was talking about, either (maybe a mix up?). Either way, just letting you know. Also, I was unaware that categories were not allowed on proposed pages (my bad). --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:04, December 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey LG, how was your holidays? Mine was okay.


 * I have another idea that I would love to get your two cents on (but I will also bring it up on the talk page if needed). In short, I want to expand Long Island to also include Brookhaven (the area in grey). My reasoning for which is for two reasons. First, Brookhaven avoided direct attack on Doomsday, but did suffer the affects of the "ring of fire" on its westernmost border. Second, since you have made mention that Cape Cod would be fine (despite having a direct attack), then adding this area that wasn't attacked shouldn't be an issue.


 * My idea would involve having LI incorporate the town around 2009, after years of cleanup and gradual re-population. What would your take be on this.


 * Also, I came across a typo today. The article Electromagetic Pulse is missing an "N" in the title. Just wanted to tell you. XD --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:56, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. So the expansion and the date seem alright, wonderful. Is this something I have to bring up on the talk page, or can I just go with it? I have a map I have been working on for weeks which includes this expansion. I will just upload it, and I hope I am going with the timeline rules here.

Lol. I thought that was funny too. I wanted to link to it on my Shoreham page, and after ten minutes of searching for the link, it became obvious. Oh well, we're only human.

I also have two more things. I am considering to make a template specifically for the Outer Lands. Would this be something I have to propose before using?

Also, as part of me cleaning up the files here, I came across File:Vexilloid of the Roman Empire.svg, and noticed that you specifically wanted it to remain an older version (and encouraged the uploading of several duplicates). Since this was over a year ago, and that the file had no links when I came across it, I assume that this argument is no longer the case. I have uploaded the current file used on Wikipedia (as well as adding the licensing). If you are still keen on keeping the older version, then I do apologize for getting involved, and I will revert this if needed. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 20:33, December 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I will add it soon.




 * Glad you aren't mad at me. If you would like, we can add the varied version as a separate file. I was going to bring this up otherwise, but Chris wasn't happy of the recent changes to the coloring Wikipedia did to Russia's flag (though I personally hatted the previous one XD), so he uploaded the old version. We can do the same here if you truly wish.


 * Also, if you don't mind me asking (just curious), why do you care about this detail? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 01:57, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

I understand. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:43, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

DD
I was looking at Anhui and Henan, as I was checking out the list of nuked cities in China, and Henan's capital city of Zhengzhou was the only one in the two states was that hit, and there was only one nation in the area, the Dragon Empire. Vivaporius says: "I don't need a slogan!" 22:22, December 15, 2012 (UTC)

Okay then, I'll keep looking around then. Still can find any open areas, and I'm still surprised that every tiny little island has been called. I don't even know how that was possible. :/ Vivaporius says: "I don't need a slogan!" 18:13, December 16, 2012 (UTC)

Project Agawin: saving Fire Wiki
I have come across a wiki that is in desperate need of a major clean and reboot. None of the Admins have been active for some time. The wiki is all but dead. I have tried contacting Wika to request full rights as an admin and maybe even adopt it (If that is possible) but have not been answered. Could you provide a contact who will reliably answer?

Thank you,

David Rain (Sometimes...) (talk) 13:34, December 16, 2012 (UTC)

Stirlings 2013
Skimming through the Stirlings shows me that we're facing somewhat of a lack of nominations in comparison to last year. Is this something normal or this is somwhat out of order?

Fegelein! Fegelein! Fegelein! 21:19, December 16, 2012 (UTC)

I did two or three. I haven't looked over the page yet, but my hunch says that you've nominated a couple as well.

I'll see if there's anything or anyone else I could nominate to get the bal rolling.

Fegelein! Fegelein! Fegelein! 05:14, December 18, 2012 (UTC)

Timeline Adoption & Deletion
I would llike to use big portions of this TL:

http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Japanese_Victory_at_Midway

in my adopted "Japanese Victory TL". Can you delete this TL:

http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Japanese_Victory_at_Midway

As I have copied down what I need from it

Vexacus (talk) 15:17, December 17, 2012 (UTC)

Can anyone nominate for the Stirling Awards?AP (talk) 05:17, December 18, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks alot man. I think I'll check out Spain first. And thanks about that other part too. Vivaporius says: "I don't need a slogan!" 17:02, December 18, 2012 (UTC)

Hey, I've settled on developing a nation in the Congo, i.e., the areas of both the DR Congo and Republic of the Congo not taken by any canon nations already. That or the Ivory Coast and Ghana. Vivaporius says: "I don't need a slogan!" 00:48, December 19, 2012 (UTC)

User talk:King Charles V
I have replyed to your comment on his talk page.Steam-man (talk) 01:31, December 19, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I was eyeing the provinces of and  since I haven't found any articles about them yet. As for Angola and the West African nations, I'll check them out. Thanks again. Vivaporius says: "I don't need a slogan!" 03:43, December 19, 2012 (UTC)

hello
i got a blog i woild like to delite, it's allready been taged to be delited. can you take care of it for me?

Wingman1 05:01, December 19, 2012 (UTC)

A Darker Place
um i need a name for the new world in my tl i cant keep referring to it as the nw. Nk

Hey, here is my entry for DD, Tshuapa. I cut out that piece of land belonging to Isiro, so the claims should not conflict with any of the surrounding nations. Also, given that Katanga and Zaire are both stubs, would be possible (canon-speaking), for me to invade/annex them? Vivaporius says: "I don't need a slogan!" 02:20, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

Possible city-states in central Michigan
Hey LG. I was wondering if there's a possibility of a surviving city-state in central Michigan?

Hello
Well, I'm here! I looked at the DD map and many areas now seem to be occupied or have larger nations. I was wondering if the invasion plan is still on? It seems like the world is right now distracted by things going on in their home territories and things, and the SAC seems to be dormant. So shall we strike? Imp (Say Hi?!) 09:57, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

Haha, yeah I'll archive it. In the new year, ok.

I have been adding little things in the UIP page, care to check over them and give me suggessions? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 10:46, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I was under the impression that Katanga, Isiro, Kivu, and Zaire were the only nations in the Congo. :( Vivaporius says: "I don't need a slogan!" 01:56, December 22, 2012 (UTC)

Really? Well thank you. I'd like to base it in region of the Congo if possible. Thanks. Vivaporius says: "I don't need a slogan!" 18:55, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Vietnam (1983: Doomsday)
I've got an idea for Vietnam in Doomsday. What if Chinese refugees establish a Chinese dominated People's Republic of Tonkin in the north, where much of the Vietnamese communists go. This allows the re-democratized Vietnam to focus their attention to the south, and eventually defeat the unpopular PRT. What do you think? Yank 23:44, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Nunavut (1983:Doomsday)
Is their anything on what the people in Nunavut did? I've tried to join the game before but can't find some open land that would fit into the time line. Marcus/Michael Villanova 15:36, December 24, 2012 (UTC)

Just letting you know
Happy Holidays, LG. I am just giving you another heads up. I am allowing Breizhcatalonia1993 to edit the  page in New Union. He mentioned to me that you were giving him a hard time about this (thought I haven't seen you guys talking recently, so I have no idea what he really means). But anyway, just letting you know. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 17:14, December 25, 2012 (UTC)

Little Doubt
I want to be sure, so i ask to you. I want nominate this article to Best New Article, which i created in colaboration with KingSweden for his timeline. I can, right? ^_^U Regards! --Katholico (talk) 05:35, December 26, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much :D Regards! --Katholico (talk) 03:55, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Adolf Schicklgruber?
I've heard Adolf Hitler was called Adolf Schicklgruber for a time. Would you happen to know if and when this happened? I'm plannng a timeline where Hitler is killed in World War One. Thanks in advance!

Doctor Evulz (talk) 18:56, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

I must have confused him with his father. Thanks!

Doctor Evulz (talk) 02:54, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

Stronger latinoamerica
may i ask why do you classify it as ASB ? Sine dei gloriem (talk) 02:50, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

what status would be the one of the nations so that the TL is not asb Sine dei gloriem (talk) 02:49, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

LG,  seriously, in which case would the asb not be asb or biased without leaving the entire idea of it, and why is it asb biased Sine dei gloriem (talk) 20:56, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

they aren't randomly independent, the pod is that the viceroy of new granada doesn't withdraw the tax increase and that the neogranadines revolt in similar way to the American during the revolution, the other colonies despite not being directly affected, they get affected as this only increases the small leveled at that moment hate they had due to The spanish preferring spanish more than creoles, thus many revolt aswell, in similar way that the thirteen colonies did, they do have reasons to declare independence as much as the Americans did Sine dei gloriem (talk) 02:46, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

I know, but its the one that sparkled the already existant hate, same in my timeline, but well, what should i change to make the timeline not asb biased Sine dei gloriem (talk) 03:05, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

my goal is to keep the latinoamerican nations united  and more stable, outside that i don't have any other major goals currently so, i ask again what should i change to make the TL not biased

is it possible that to make my timeline not asb, only keep them more stable similar to The actual austria, not powerfull but relatively capable of defending themselves also,also if i make a less latinoamerican centered tl would you withdraw the biased label, also i have 5 reason for independence those are the reasons i find that would make possible that Latinoamerica gets independence, would it be plausible Sine dei gloriem (talk) 04:35, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Racial tension, Spanish population were treated superior to the Creoles,
 * Tax, in OTL there was an actual revolt against the Tax increase in Nueva granada, Only stopped when the Viceroy withdraw the Increase, which is one of my POD that it didn't happened
 * 1) Some Latinoamerican population had heard about the Ilustration beliefs, and or had been taught on them, these people in the Given situation would start spreading things like equality of man, and info about the Democracy
 * 2) there were already pro independentists like Francisco de Miranda,the leader of my timeline
 * 3) People of the Colonies like in OTL didn't like to respond to External figures, and originally it was intended that Nueva granada to become a Dominion of Spain responding directly to the king

Question
There is an issue in the Principia Moderni II map game that I'd like to get your opinion on. A Muslim megastate known as the Hashemite Caliphate has taken over much of the Muslim world, from Deccan to Algeria; they have also taken over areas with prominent groups of christians like Armenia, Georgia, Egypt, Syria, Ethiopia, etc. One of the mods made those groups leave their homeland(because they were "tired" of living under oppressive Islamic rule) and establish "expatriate kingdoms" in the New World right when all the European nations were colonizing the Americas. The Jews even left Palestine. Would this actually happen? Would Syriac/Coptic/ any other kind of christian just leave their lands for a place they don't even know they'll survive in? Let me know. Thanks.AP (talk) 06:16, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, LG. AP (talk) 06:34, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

Star wars ripoff - possible infringment
Hi. Thought I would bring This to your attention. It appears to be 'borrowing heavily' to say the least

David Rain (Sometimes...) (talk) 14:16, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Touhou Project in 1983: Doomsday
Hello.

I was thinking about doing a list of characters and having some short descriptions for each.

Should I make a separate page for that or can I put it on the ZUN page? -Kogasa 2012年12月31日 02:26:00 (JST)

What are the naming protocols? i believe iam following them, please explain 07sameva (talk) 00:28, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Stirlings
When does voting start? Fegelein! Fegelein! Fegelein! 00:54, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

My apologies, will revert to full name for future articles

the timeline (What Luck!) is not biased, it is based on a confederate gettysburg (a common timeline on here i agree) followed by a sucessful assasination attempt on Lincoln (a real event from August 1864 that very nearly killed him). 07sameva (talk) 11:10, January 3, 2013 (UTC)

Imperial Federation idea
How's it going, LG. I had an epiphany recently for 13 Fallen Stars that I would love to get your take on. Since nationalism as we know it doesn't exist, and World War I doesn't happen (at least as OTL), this made me think of how the Empires would evolve here. From what I can make out from this, would be more time and reasoning for the existence of the so-called "." Nationalism would not exist, meaning there would be no "Canadians" or "Australians" (at least on a national sense), and there would be more time to mold the idea into something workable.

I am also considering this idea after rethinking what the original author of this timeline was thinking about by having Canada (for instance) being a kingdom. In retrospect, this may have been what he was actually meaning (and if that be the case, then I would like to look into this possibility further).

I would rather get your two cents on this idea, rather than spend weeks on it to only find out that it is impractical. But from what I can make out on my own, I would say it seems interesting to look into, would you say? Look forward to your response. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:20, January 4, 2013 (UTC)


 * I am still uncertain as to what "nationalism" would be here, but pretty much what you said is about right. I only meant that "Canadians" would not exist on a "nationalist" level, but more of a regional level (kinda like Californians don't call themselves Californians on a national level).


 * I had to look it up to believe it... but Canada really wanted to be called "Kingdom"? This also shocks me because the original creator also referred to Canada (and all of Spain's claims) as Kingdoms. I took this as a whole, and thought this meant independence, not just a name. Very weird (again... still new to monarchies).


 * So an Imperial Federation could be plausible here, that is nice to hear. I will continue to look into this idea. Also, because this is new to me, how would a British Imperial Federation be structured here. I've heard many interpretations, including it being (more or less) the Commonwealth of Nations with and EU flair. However, I am more interested in an actual federation, with the countries of the UK, provinces of "Canada", states of Australia, and so on, as equal members of a federation that would have a strong parliament and a King/Queen figurehead (i.e., OTL UK but larger and is a federation). I know the issue of India and it's potential power in such a union, but what I have in mind (at least from the start) would be a whites-only state (more or less). Would this be right? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:20, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

qwerty
may i know which precise elements are considered biased? my political views are liberal-left, so i tried to balance out successful Stevenson-JFK-RFK presidencies with successful Bush Sr - Dole - Rodham (Hillary doesnt meet bill, holds her parents conservetive views) presidencies. 07sameva (talk) 11:57, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

Trance in 1983: Doomsday
Hello again.

I was thinking of creating an article for in 1983: Doomsday and, I'm wondering if he and his family could have escaped  and/or  somehow, or they would be doomed as they had no place to go.

If not, I'm wondering if he could still become the DJ and would produce Trance music. -Kogasa 2013年1月05日 06:24:42 (JST)

please may i know how "what luck!" is biased, 07sameva (talk) 01:01, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

how is it biased? please give examples!07sameva (talk) 10:21, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

Yet another question
Hello, LG. Scraw and I have been thinking of new map game ideas to create a game with concepts that haven't been overused(IE World Wars 1 and 2, the Cold War, etc). For one of my ideas, I'm thinking of beginning it at the outbreak of the War of Spanish Succession. Is there any plausible way the French-Spanish coalition could have won the war?AP (talk) 08:35, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

have rewritten parts of "what luck!", feel it is successfully neutral now. should be declassified as biased, 07sameva (talk) 00:40, January 7, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. It seems to be the best game idea we have so we might just do it, despite an ASB tag. Several ASB games have made it, I hope this one can work out. Thanks again.AP (talk) 00:58, January 7, 2013 (UTC)

have decided to rewrite the actual POD.

Union troops dont find the lost order, Lee lures McClellan to gettysburg(meaning a battle of gettysburg in october 1862), where he defeats him in a similar fashion that Lee was defeated by Meade in OTL. Lincoln lacks the great victory he needs to issue the emancipation proclaimation, consequently britain and france remain considerably pro confederate. Lee is reluctant to enter Washington, British intervene for peace, on January 1 1863 rather than validating the emancipation proclaimarion Lincoln announces a peace with the csa. Lincoln is now unpopular, hated by the peace democrats for "starting the war" and hated by war democrats and some republicans for not being an affective war leader. In August 1864 he is assasinated by a disgruntled soldier (as he very nearly was in OTL 1864).

This is not biased since it is based on factual events and inspired by a alt hist essay "If the lost order hadnt been lost", if you should see fit to repeatedly add "what luck!" to the biased catagory then can you please leave a reason on the talk page, i really want to make this timeline detailed and want to get it right, 07sameva (talk) 09:15, January 7, 2013 (UTC)

Look Lordganon, ive asked you this several times now, if your going to say my timeline's bias then please say how! How else am i meant to improve it! I admit all of my timlines so far have been simplistic and quite bad so i wanted to make a decent start and do a really good,detailed and well written timeline! I want to contribute yet you keep saying what i write is trash but you dont say how! really lordganon, please just say which parts are bias and dont just say the whole thing is! I JUST WANT TO WRITE A DECENT TL!07sameva (talk) 17:46, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

Intelligent plants question
Hello LordGannon,

Event though I stated that I would understand why my timeline could be considered ASB, I want to now why it is put into this category. The enviromental changes stated in the timeline are fact, and the science behind the evolutionary tansition of the plants is plausible. If I need to add any more links providing more evidence for the temperature changes, or more links explaining how the evolution of the plants is plausible, please just say so. This is not a harsh message, but I just want to now how I could make my timeline better.

Regards TheAustralianAtheist (talk) 08:53, January 10, 2013 (UTC)

the whole thing is not biased at all!

The POD is taken from an essay (that i have already named), and the various butterfly effects are entirely plausible (its actually unusual that the Confederates allowed their battle plans into union hands, had lee had the element of surprise then he would have almost certainly won a victory over mcclellan), please challenge anyone of my fictional presidencies (CS and US) they are all plausible!

How is "the whole thing" bias though! i generally cant see how you could think that to be the case! prehaps you could introduce a third party into the debate to read the timeline and give me their opinion! but please tell me HOW it is bias!07sameva (talk) 17:08, January 10, 2013 (UTC)

Picture Question
If the picture of the severed head on the barbed wire was taken down, I take it anything like a lynched body would also be taken down? I ask this as IO have an idea for a new section on my TL. If the lynched body picture is not allowed, I can change the section to remove itVexacus (talk) 20:02, January 10, 2013 (UTC)

Stop removing my categories
I've noticed you've removed categories on two of my recently created pages. Unless you have a logical reason behind doing so I kindly request you stop doing this.Central Victory Creator 10:29, January 11, 2013 (UTC)

After reading through most of the other articles in the "ASB-Bias" catagory, i cant see how you could class "basically the whole" of my timleine bias! the greater norweigan reich, Japanese victory and reign of roosevelt are completly biased, and the latter TL isnt even classed as bias! I wouldnt mind if you just thought a couple elements of my timeline were a bit far fetched (RFK and Palin being presidents for example) but saying the whole of my TL is bias is quite frankly weird. My TL doesnt belong in the same catagory as these "wanks", and i cant see how you could think that to be the case. 07sameva (talk) 16:40, January 11, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Otl Presidents in 13 Fallen Stars
This is quite a surprise to see. Had no idea that you were an expert on ancestry. XD

Your suggestions are about the same direction I was heading. I also like your suggestion for Hoover being Pennsylvanian, especially because both PA and DE voted to reelect Hoover in 1932 (he would sure have a good home here). The only thing I can't put my finger on is Obama. I know his mother is from the Midwest, while his father was from Kenya (just read that his parent met in a Russian class... *Twilight Zone Theme*). Not impossible, just very close. Now this is just making me think of how Virginia and Carolina would (if at all) abolish slavery here (probably much later in the 19th century). Other than that, than you again.

Also, before I forget, I commented you about my Imperial Federation idea and never got a reply. I am sure you were busy (you weren't on for a while), and a flood of comments came on you talk page, so I can understand. Forgive me for digging into this. ^^; --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:58, January 11, 2013 (UTC)


 * Well thank you again. Also (for the record), I was slowly looking into everybody. I did manage to label Nixon and the Bushs.


 * Virginia and Carolina sound about the way I had in mind. Also, without the French Revolution and the Spanish colonies leaving early in the century, wouldn't slavery be more widespread for a good-half of the 19th century (I know Haiti's slaves revolted, and Mexico [at least] declared the abolition of slavery upon independence).


 * Glad you found my Virginia idea amusing. But what I didn't expect was you suggesting it would be more logical to do the opposite. I didn't realize abolitionism would be strong enough to make a pro-slavery revolt in VA. But again, should have realized this when it was the Atlantic coast which benefited from slavery (it not being too usable in the mountainous west is one of the reasons WV left). I also came across the odd fact that VA and KY didn't vote for the same candidate in 1860 as the rest of the south. But either way, you honestly think this is workable?


 * I understand, I get the same way.


 * So more or less like the EU (but stronger). This kinda reminds me of the (a united entity between the Netherlands and her colonies which remained). My only question would involve the counties of the UK. While Ireland was most likely to become its own dominion (or independent), what about the others? Would a federation evolve from here?


 * Also, I have an idea for a new British colony for this timeline. I believe that with no French Revolution, and thereby making the Latin American Revolutions not be successful in the early part of the century; this would make Patagonia an open target for the British (or the French). I believe Spain would focus more on the Viceroyalties then they would with this region (especially after barely keeping them), that the British could gradually move in (there was some interest I believe [the Falklands are a giveaway]). This would be different from OTL, in which Chile and Argentina (Chile more so) had early interest in Patagonia. I would love to get your two cents on this (probably a stupid idea). --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 17:37, January 12, 2013 (UTC)


 * What do you mean by "a touch more power internationally for each member"?


 * Glad the Patagonia idea is workable. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 19:42, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

I can probably see this happening. However, I still believe that as time progresses and technology gets better, this federation would gradually become more and more of a single nation (just what I see).

Also, I thought about something a few days ago, and I wanted to get your opinion. If you remember my original idea of having this be a completely single nation with the subdivisions being the states (not the actual ones being them), I believe I may have found a variable that (at the least) may alter the borders of this federation over time.

Lets compare Australia and New Zealand. Prior to 1900, these two were actually 7 separate colonies (called the "Australian Colonies"). The move towards federation would be achieved, but with New Zealand being able to go its own way (primarily because of their PM at the time). Assuming this also happens ATL, then I foresee a potential conflict of interest. With a federal parliament being the supreme power of this larger federation, the Australian states would be subordinate to an Australian federation, while New Zealand has direct representation. And note, prior to 1901, New Zealand was just another Australian colony, with little difference from New South Wales or Victoria; aside from distance and leadership (and that it was only after becoming a Dominion that a distinct Kiwi culture became).

With this, I could potentially see some of Australia's states wanting to also gain more representation in such a parliament; with Western Australia being the prime target.

I also compare this to the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Netherlands Antilles. When it first established, this Kingdom comprised of the European Netherlands and the Netherlands Antilles (Suriname was also a founding member, but left later on). Now, the NA has divided into new countries. I know that comparing Australia and the Caribbean are not the same things, but given the larger distances and growing move towards more unity, I would think that this would be an outcome over time. I can also compare this to the Soviet Union in New Union, as more republics were established over time.

Overtly, I don't see this happening completely, as many regions would benefit from being united. However, some parts may attempt to do so; including Western Australia, Ireland (maybe, I did receive your thoughts on this), and the many Caribbean states (much like OTL). Or as new members join, the idea of creating new federations would be undesirable (such as in Africa).

Or like everything else, I am not looking at this the right way, and I am only ranting nonsense again.

Also, because I feel we may be in different times, when do you believe that such a federation would be enacted? I personally believe no earlier than 1900, and no later than 1940.

This is just another question that I have been thinking of for a while now. I am sure that this is just another pointless idea, but hear me out. Prior to 1900, Spanish Guinea (which would be sold to NN around 1883) claimed a lot more territory then what is currently Equatorial Guinea (see here), and it was in the that the current border was agreed.

Anyway, I was looking into how it could have turned out bigger (because I'm being greedy), and I may have found a potential way (thought probably unlikely). Let's say that with Germany non-existent (and doubting Prussia takes its place), this may leave the French (or the British) to claim Cameroon. Combined with potentially good relations with France, the French may be willing to give more territory to NN in 1900. Just wanted to get your take on this. I was also thinking, because of its small size, location, and timing; what of Togoland being NN's? I'm sure this is stupid, so forgive me if I am. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 01:17, January 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * What do you mean by "more unified overall"? This is further getting confusing, so they would be independent, but more unified?


 * I personally doubt it should happen any time prior to 1900. There was still support prior to WWI, and without the war (or the US), I believe it would continue to last here.


 * But if it does end up with WA not joining initially, I would personally show more interest towards it just remaining separate (I have been wanting to incorporate an independent WA in one of my timelines for a while now).


 * Like I said, pointless. So forget I made mention of it. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 18:01, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

So are you telling me that Australia would virtually become a de facto unitary state?

I suppose it could for earlier. However, Canada (Ontario and Quebec) would not exist within the British Empire at the time. I know you told me that you just use it the name for simplicity, but I personally don't know how supportive the Maritime Provinces or the Metis/Colonists would support such a thing. Also, what do you mean by "this was a position advocated by a minority prior to Confederation otl"? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 18:35, January 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * I think I understand. Australia would (more or less) devolve into a "United Province of Canada," being one entity, but with the original colonies having some say. I think I got that right, and this would be more the reason that I believe Western Australia would not be included (especially since WA was not originally part of NSW, with the remaining states [aside from Tasmania IIRC] were once part of it). I can't speak for how France works (aside from me knowing that it is a unitary state that includes parts of Africa and South America), but I believe I can get the gist of it.


 * I didn't mean to question you choice of wording (i.e., Canada), but was merely questioning whether or not the Maritime Provinces, Newfoundland, and the rest of British North America would go along with such a union (especially since I was under the impression that it was the Two Canadas OTL which held the shots).


 * I also came across a historic "typo" that the original author made. While Nova Scotia did once hold all of the Maritime Provinces at one point, New Brunswick (the first province to split off) was created in 1784 (prior to the established POD of 1788). So in reality, it would probably become an Australia-like situation if anything here (they unite into a bigger province, which ironically some in contemporary Canada want to have happen). --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 17:16, January 19, 2013 (UTC)

Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation
I was wondering if you could remove the ASB-Biased as I've tried to remove the bias and I'm starting the timeline over so its not biased.

Bobalugee1940 (talk) 03:45, January 12, 2013 (UTC)

Hello, just popping in
Hello, LordGanon, This is Ming777 from Ah.com

If you hav any concerns about my TL, please message me. I want to avoid any problems with the folks here who have made an extraordinary collaborative AH world.

Mikelima777 (talk) 00:30, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

Skywalker Ranch
Do you think a very small survivor state in Skywalker Ranch would be plausible? I looked on the map of strikes in North America and then I checked the CarlosLabs simulator. As long as the wind isn't blowing fallout right in the direction of the Ranch, it has a chance of survival. CrimsonAssassin (talk) 17:15, January 15, 2013 (UTC)

Edwards AFB is nowhere near Skywalker Ranch, though fallout from Mare Island might hit it, depending on the wind direction. CrimsonAssassin (talk) 13:37, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

Used this for reference. http://www.wunderground.com/history/The wind from San Francisco is blowing 11 mph in a WNW direction, which, from what I can tell, is missing Skywalker Ranch. The wind in Novato, where Mare Island is, was completely still. I'm going to assume the prevailing wind patterns spread the fallout to the northeast, away from Skywalker Ranch. Further evidence exists in this map on the 1983DD talk page http://www.ki4u.com/nuclearsurvival/states/aacont2.jpg. CrimsonAssassin (talk) 21:42, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

Not sure where you're getting the location of Edwards AFB. Every source I've found points it somewhere near LA, not San Francisco.

Yes, but the closest weather station to Novato (where Mare Island is) reports still winds.

The prevailing winds will take the fallout northeast, not to the west. Multiple sources tell that, as a rule of thumb, always assume the fallout will follow these patterns. These wind currents go over the Rockies. The major influence of the fallout will not be winds blowing from the Rockies. It would be the prevailing wind currents that take the fallout east. Also, the map we use was created by a reputable source. If you don't see it as accurate, why are we using it? CrimsonAssassin (talk) 16:02, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

ASB: Biased ?
I appreciate the fact that you are convinced my timeline is biased, i disagree and will undo any further changes you make to my timeline. I would appreciate it if you wouldnt remove my pages from the American Civil War timeline also, i dont know why your doing that. I wouldnt waste your time adding my pages to the biased catagory, i will undo any changes you make every day i come on here. 07sameva (talk) 15:50, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

It would help if you explained to Sam WHY you think it is "ASB: Biased." So far, the only thing wrong with this is the fact that a second POD is introduced which does not seem to be connected with the first. The fact that these points are considered "luck" does not, in my opinion, make them "alien space bat" material. The interception of Lee's plans are in general considered pivotal in the course of the war. An early assasination of Lincoln would have indeed altered the election in favor of the Democrats. Not enough of the time line has been written to determine much as to the outcome.

Every writer comes in with some bias, but the cateogoization system should not be used as an editorial comment. If the author of a time line does not wish to be included amongst the list of "ASB" articles, there is nothing that requires that such an article be so marked. SouthWriter (talk) 18:21, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

The marker
Why is the marker impossible? Doesn't the rule says you can use a short form? Laptop_Zombie 13:28, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Britain's World
Hey LG. I was wondering if you could give me your opinion or idea for the first Prime Minister of the United Provinces of America. I currently have Patrick Henry, but who would you suggest to be the first Prime Minister?

Regards - Enclavehunter (talk) 04:53, January 18, 2013 (UTC)

Well...
We are 20 days into the new year, so can planning for the attack into the northeast commence? Imp (Say Hi?!) 13:43, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

May I also say thank you for fixing up my sentences on the UIP page, although you did remove my organic growing para! ;)  Imp (Say Hi?!) 13:46, January 20, 2013 (UTC)



Well, here we go.

Stage one: A fast paced infantry and mobilised unit attack into the little rouge states in W. Bengal. Should be overrun within a week. Objectives will be to seal multiple routes to Sikkim for military use. Secondary objective to crush resistance in the area.

Anything to add? I think it is a solid and stable beginning.

Stage two: After consolidating gains and building up troops in Sikkim and airlifting tanks and men into Arunanchal Pradesh over a week, we will begin the second stage. This will begin with an armoured attack into Bodoland and then Acikland to gain the attention of the other states. This is the clever part - the main attack is actually launched by Arunanchal Pradesh (the build-up troops could be sent through former China), catching Assam off-guard (who will be assembling their military to the west). Then another attack will be launched from the Pradesh, this time catching the Assamese on their flank and closing up and encircling Bololandese troops.

This could take anywhere from 2 weeks to two months. Thoughts? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 18:23, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

I also have two more maps readied. The two maps are about different topics. Here is one as to how the region would look after all these wars:

And here (I found a superior quality base map, great if you would like to edit it), is what the attacks would be like. The red blocks are meant to symbolise enemy build-up. The goled arrows are UIP attacks and the numbers are meant to show chronologial order (pretty chuffed with that map tbh).

So what do you think? Are we a go for Stage three? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 18:40, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, completely forgot to mention, throughout Stage two, the UIP will use its airforce, and get a chance to test out its new aircraft (all of the new aircraft will survive, but I think a few Mig-21s being downed would be appropriate). They would pummel many artillary positions opposing the advance. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 18:43, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Well, I see your point about stage one. New time allocated is 3 days. What I meant for going into China was the helicopters, the could have flown over former Chinese airspace and noting would have happened. I'm sure that even the Tibetians cannot do anything about that.

Hmmm, I always did think that the UIP was short on tanks, and you proved me right. Yet I think whatever they have, should be used whereever they can (even if its only a little area, it will give the UIP a bit of an advantage). How long do you think will the campaign last anyway (stage two).

I have got a plan for an excuse. Lets say that an important military (or civilian) position was bombed on the 25th - the place where the bombing would happen would be preparing for Republic Day. Then, somehow, we find out the evidence leads to the governments in the east (this info could be planted), and on the 26th - Republic Day - war is declared.

Thoughts? Imp (Say Hi?!) 16:56, January 23, 2013 (UTC)

Ah, well there goes the troop transport over Tibet! Same with the tank options, looks like using them in a supporting role would be the only wise option. Hmm, the idea is good, best I could come up with! Its seems like the pilot rescue-op it is.

I had a feeling Tula Nada would be targeted too. Yet its problem might be that Tamil Nadu might get involved in the act too, which would be bad for everyone!

So... :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 22:44, January 24, 2013 (UTC)

Tamil Nadu probably won't intervene. Even if Andhra Pradesh and the other southern states came into play, they'd probably be crushed.

Unless Pakistan came into the picture?

This could, on the other hand, be an opening for an Indian Coalition, like I suggested.

The Royal Guns (It's a PUN, people. I'm not saying I'm royal. And the name is GUNS.) (talk) 00:37, January 25, 2013 (UTC)

I see your point. Should we go ahead with it today itself? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 16:34, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Indian Coalition resulting from this? Please? The Royal Guns (talk) 02:59, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

I think we should try and get more military deals done with the Soviets. Say like repair and update some of the UIP's carriers (they'll only have something like 3) and in exchange they will get some extra much-needed manpower.

I also thing we should talk about how many roads have now been built nicely (we wrote a post about this a year or two back) and how power-grid lines are being re-laid to help increase efficiency. All thiese points are minor though. Could we say something about the construction boom beggining in Delhi and Mumbai? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 10:32, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

My edits
Why were my edits on British-Africana changed?

EoGuy (talk) 02:41, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

I give up.
I give up.

EoGuy (talk) 15:33, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Hey LG wats up, i just wanted to know who is the owner/editor of Atlantic Iron Curtain, i want to dicuss some stuff with him. Thanks man...

Alterman09 20:34, January 22, 2013 (UTC)

Virginia and Liberia
Greetings. I have made a third revision on my Virginia Civil War idea, and I hope it is about right. I also added a few programs that Lee could use in order to gradually accomplish this. However, I am not an expert on Lee or what could be done, so forgive me if it sound like BS.

I also wanted to check out something before I go too far. I made mention about Liberia becoming a protectorate in my second draft, yet you made no mention on it. This either means you missed it, or you saw no problem with it. While I would like to see Liberia become more closer to any of the American states ATL, I am still new on this. So I would love to get your two cents on this, because I do have some interesting ideas in mind for Liberia. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 00:06, January 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Glad to hear that I am making sense. While I have no doubt that Lincoln may support Lee ATL, but would be the chances of him suffering the same fate as OTL (i.e., being assassinated)?


 * I am still working out a timetable for this war, so now I will make it shorter (ending around 1862-63?). Also, I had no intention of the British supporting the rebellion, but that the rebels would seek their assistance during the war (as was OTL's CSA), and just like OTL, the Brits would ignore (more so than OTL). But details, still working on it.


 * You honestly believe Liberia would have been a protectorate earlier? From what I read from OTL, it appears that it was just a series of settlements up until the formation of an independent Liberia. My guess is that this would be the same, and I could see some type of international cooperation on this matter (since Maryland had some say there OTL), but with an (obvious) Virginian lead.


 * But irregardless of what Liberia may differ, I agree that Lee would probably formalize such protection during his administration. I have other ideas for Liberia, but all in due time. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 06:24, January 25, 2013 (UTC)

Congrats.... Me?


Leaving this here so I remember. Lordganon (talk) 11:12, January 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much, and also congratulations for you!! :D --Katholico (talk) 20:02, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * ^What Kath said. :) [[Image:IMPERIAL NY-SPQR 1.png|25px]][[Image:Regen Flag.png|30px|border]] Fegelein! Fegelein! Fegelein! 20:04, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

My Edits
It's a dirty job but somebody's got to do it.

I'm like the English professor in the Men's Room:

I don't write on the walls. I just correct the spelling and grammar.

EoGuy (talk) 15:57, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

83DD: India and China
Imp and I had an idea to revive the old Indian Coalition plan.

Goes as follows:

As the UIP is raining down hellfire upon the heads of the breakaway states, a regiment on the Raya- UIP hears rumors that Raya will be next. What emerges here is a massive firefight between the two sides on the scale of the Chola incident. The Rayans heavily lose, of course, but UIP top brass pulls back the UIP troops. They are not willing to risk a total SAC stop of aid. That said, this scares the stuffing out of Raya, who flee to TN for support, fearing that they'll be the next Tula. TN suggests the IC idea to AP and Raya, a military alliance, certainly provoked. SAC sees the UIP as the aggressor, and cuts down on aid to the UIP, sending it instead to the newly formed IC. Tensions go on between the two nations, as the UIP gains in the East. Then, when India is left between the IC, Pakistan and the UIP... well...

Oh, and as for China, I was wondering if a small, exceptionally major war emerges here. After the NPRC becomes official. Why isn't it canon yet, by the way? The Royal Guns (talk) 19:20, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

Wait, I have an idea. Since Bhutan is an ally of the UIP and has allowed it before, we can send a large amount of forces into Arunanchal Pradesh through the country. In exchange we can offer them better trading or something. What do you think? Imp (Say Hi?!) 18:13, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Wait, yes, but the troops might have heard rumors that such an attack would happen. They behave boisterously, the Rayans take offense at that, there's a gunfight, and Raya is now terrified that the UIP will take exception to this. With their last card- SAC aid-played, they need to sneak in an ace, and the IC is just what is needed.

The Royal Guns (talk) 00:02, January 29, 2013 (UTC)



Ah, ok then - no problem. We will proceed as planned. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 22:11, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

BTW, would this map be ok to show the progress made by the nations in expanding in South Africa?

What do you think? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 21:30, January 30, 2013 (UTC)

Lesotho might expand too? After all, after New Britain they're the most powerful state in South Africa. And they're not really going to be friendly with the OFS.

The Royal Guns (talk) 00:32, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

So it is too much for the states, ah. Well I think Waterboersland couldn't expand much. Orange could, but would they? Same with the Azanian League, would they? I just want to know to make a new map :)  Imp (Say Hi?!) 22:55, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

Well, I have made the new map and updated it? Ok now, or do some areas need to be reduced? :D

Holy Roman Empire?
I got this off of alternatehistory.com:



"''PoD is the survival of both Frederick I Barbarossa and his son Henry VI Hohenstaufen to the completion of the Third Crusade and a successful long reign respectively. This creates a strong basis for the gradual centralization of the HRE and sees it turned into a hereditary monarchy at the very end of the 12nd century. Their talented scion Frederick II is educated to complete the basic job of empire-building, which he does over his own decades-long equally successful reign. Some intermittent civil wars in Germany and Italy see the resistance of particularist nobles and city-states crushed and gradually snuffed out, and the the decisive defeat of the theocratic Papacy. Another long reign by his son Conrad IV, in a dynasty notable for the longevity of its talented rulers, sees the Western Roman/Carolingian Empire definitely being reborn in the eyes of its subjects as a centralized monarchy spanning Germany, Italy, Austria, Bohemia-Moravia, the Low Countries, Burgundy, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Dalmatia, its armies swelled by the manpower of Germany and Italy and its coffers filled by the taxation flowing from the trade centers of Flanders, northern Germany, Franconia and Palatinate, Bohemia, northern Italy, and Sicily. A couple of powerful new monarchical states, however, arise in Western Europe and an ancient one is reborn in the East that would question the imperial primacy of the HRE.'' Butterflies arising from this change:

-The national unification of France is wrecked, and the fortunes of its neighbor states boosted, when the HRE interferes in the struggles between the Kings of France and the Angevin Empire on one side, and Aragon, France, and the Counts of Tolouse, on the other side. This results in the Plantagenet dynasty successfully uniting England and their feudal possessions and conquests in northern and western France into a unitary state. The Angevin Empire is also able to affirm its supremacy over Ireland and a Scotland that lacks strong backers on the other side of the English Channel.

-Aragon, not the Capetingian French monarchy, annexes Languedoc and Provence during the confused mess of suppressing the Cathar heresy. Aragon is able to capitalize this added power into gradually uniting the other Iberian Christian states under its control during the successful Reconquista, and to seize Corsica and Sardinia. Sicily and southern Italy, however, remain wholly outside its grasp, due to the strong grip of the HRE on Italy.

-The kingdom of France is shrunken down to an unhappy, landlocked buffer state (and occasional recurrent battlefield) between the imperial behemoths of the HRE, the Angevins, and Iberia. In the 14th century, it suffers a dynastic crisis, and after an inconclusive war between the three great powers at its borders, it is eventually partitioned between the Angevins and the HRE. Iberia swaps its share with Britain in exchange for southern Aquitaine. -The kingdoms of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden are pushed into forming a real union (the so-called Kalmar Union) for mutual protection from their powerful neighbors.

-The strength of Britain, Iberia, and the HRE leads to a successful new round of Crusades, to a revitalization of the Byzantine Empire once the Islamic pressure is lifted off its back, and to an expansion of the Reconquista in North Africa. As a result, Iberia conquers North Africa. The HRE seizes Eygpt and Nubia. The Byzantine Empire recovers full control of Anatolia, Greece, Macedonia, and Bulgaria, and is later able to conquer the Levant, Armenia, and Mesopotamia. Serbia and Wallachia-Moldavia become vassal states of the Byzantine Empire.

-The strength of the HRE makes its expansion in Eastern Europe highly successful: besides the OTL achievements, Greater Poland, Masovia, Prussia, and western Hungary are assimilated and annexed to the HRE. The rest of Poland and Hungary are turned into vassal states of the HRE (Poland getting reunified in the process) and opened up for gradual assimilation by the Empire.

- Mongol invasion of Europe does not really reach further than Poland and Hungary, and the Tartar onslaught mostly ravages the Middle East for a while, further weakening Islamic states against the Crusader-Byzantine assault. After the Mongol Empire breaks apart, support by the HRE and the Byzantines allows Muscowy to swiftly oust the Golden Horde and build an empire in European Russia, which later expands to northern Caucasus, western Siberia, and most of Kazakhstan. By a parallel process, a Christianized Prussian tribe (TTL Lithuania equivalent) is able to expand and create a state spanning the Baltic lands, White Russia, Ukraine, and the former Khanate of Crimea.

-The Papacy never really recovers from the crushing defeat it suffers in its power struggles with the HRE and the Angevin Empire, and its ill-starred alliance with France. Britain, Iberia, and the HRE keep fighting to assert their control over the Papal Curia, stalemating each other, but further wrecking Papal power in the process for good. The Holy See gets wholly expelled from Italy, and eventually becomes an ineffectual ceremonial shadow of itself and a puppet of Iberia, with an alternating residence in Avignon and Santiago de Compostela, mostly used by the Iberian kings as a minor propaganda prop for the Reconquista. The Western monarchies eventually turn to propping up the power of the national episcopates and keeping a tight leash over them, in order to affirm secular control over their respective national clergy. Latin Church becomes quite decentralized, with the clergy of each nation being governed by the local episcopates, subordinate to the secular governments. The Ecumenic Council once again becomes the only authoritative body for the whole Church. This allows an uneasy reconciliation between the Latin and Greek Churches, although a sizable deal of distrust lingers. The success of the Crusades, and the rebirth of the Byzantine Empire, has however narrowed the distance between West and East somewhat.

-It is currently CE 1500. Although Europe spent a remarkable degree of time ad effort recovering from the Black Death, as well as from the wars that redrew its map, it seems to have regained some degree of stability, under the hegemony of the great monarchies of the HRE, Britain, Iberia, and the Byzantine Empire in an uneasy equilibrium. Wealth is filling the coffers of the kings and emperors, from improved control of the trade routes with the East and the political stability of the centralized monarchies dispelling feudal chaos, which fosters the growth of the urban trading elites. The lore plundered from the conquest of the Middle East and improved cultural exchange with Asia are fueling a huge humanistic Renaissance of cultural, scientific, philosophical, literary, and technological knowledge, with a mix of classical Greco-Roman achievements rediscovered, wholly new European ones developed, and a spread of ideas and techniques from India and China.

Despite somewhat improved access to the trade routes with Asia, the surviving Islamic states still remain a substantial obstacle, the European elites apparently share an endless appetite for the goods of the East, and trade competition between the great powers is raging. All of that all drives the search for new and better trade routes with Asia, which is made possible by advances in European naval technology providing truly Ocean-worthy ships for long travels. Intrepid explorers have now circumnavigated Africa and found a route to India and China, while others have brought back amazing news of a new landmass to the west of immense size and wealth."

What do you think?

Bobalugee1940 (talk) 22:08, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

Which flag?
So Sabah has used three flags in its history as a state of Malaysia. I'm not really interested in the first one, as it was adopted from 1963 to 1981, I think. My problem is that the second flag used by Sabah, which was used from 1982 to 1988, looks like the flag of the Philippines, which annexed the state sometime in the 1983:DD universe. I don't know if I should use that flag for the Sabah Autonomous Region, or if I should use the current flag. What do you think, LG?

Godfrey Raphael (talk) 23:38, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Ah, well. Thanks for your help! Godfrey Raphael (talk) 13:23, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Timeline Talking
A jolly guten tag to you, LG.

I now take the liberty of asking you yet another question about my timeline. This question regards the discovery of the New World.

So, I have finally decided on Portugal discover the New World around the same time as OTL, with Columbus and all, but my question to you is could it happen earlier (ex: 1400 - 1470) if it happened a different way?

                 ♒   "Fear the power    of the Dark Side of the Force."  03:36, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

OK then, that is a sufficient answer. However, I am guessing it would be possible with a POD further back into time?

Also, could you take a look at this page and provide some feedback? Many thanks.

                 ♒   "Fear the power    of the Dark Side of the Force."  00:57, January 30, 2013 (UTC)

HRE
What could've been done to centralise the HRE? I was thinking a few things:

The Thirty Year's War is won by the Catholics and the Protestant Princes are replaced by subservient Catholic Princes and over awhile the Emperors could have slowly brought the other Princes into line and centralizing the state and eventually making it hereditary and unified.

OR

Louis the Pious establishes his eldest son, Lothair, as the sole ruler of the Carolingian Empire while his other two sons are executed by Lothair when he comes to power, causing a Civil War that he eventualy wins establishing himself as the sole Emperor and creating the custom of the inheiritance going to the eldest son. Eventually the Carolingian Empire whould be crowned the Holy Roman Empire by the Pope.

OR

Charles V grants his entire realm to Phillip II, who with the total recourses of the entire Habsburg Empire could crush the Protestants and bring about #1.

(As a secondary POD Phillip and Mary could have a son, uniting England and Spain and the Holy Roman Empire, which is an entirely other story but could still work in here.)

Bobalugee1940 (talk) 22:05, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

TATM- Russia
Hey, LG! I had a few questions for you about my TL, about Russia. Thanks!
 * 1) Would the Mongols have arisen if Genghis Khan was not born? (which he would not be)
 * 2) Assuming  no to the previous question, could Kiev become the center of Ruscia again, to be later overthrown by Muscovy?
 * 3) Provided yes to the previous question, Would Ruscia splinter, or would power just shift from Kiev to Muscovy?

The Royal Guns (talk) 01:16, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

Hmm. Well, ok, I expected 1 and 3. Is there anmy way in which Kiev would retain power? Or perhaps some city to the West? Tver, Rostov?

The Royal Guns (talk) 20:42, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

So, would something like this be plausible?

Russia is invaded by the Mongols, but unlike OTL, after the initial conquerings of the first leaders (name?), unlike OTL, the Empire effectively shatters, and Russia rebels away around 1250, 1300. Kiev and all is sacked like OTL, and thus completely declines and collapses.

A few centuries later, around 1450, Russia (Ruscia) is basically united under a few states, like Lithuania (including Minsk), Kiev, Muscovy, Novgorod, etc. Of these, Muscovy and Lithuania are by far the strongest and end up conquering all the others by 1500. Then, as war develops between them, Lithuania wins, and Muscovy is heavily defeated. In order to incorporate Muscovy into Ruscia peacefully, the daughter of the Grand Prince of Lithuania is married to the son of the Grand Duke of Muscovy, and the capital of the new state is shifted to Minsk.

The next few centuries pass peacefully, with Minsk growing stronger in Ruscia, and Ruscia growing stronger in general, incorporating much of Siberia, annexing Moldavia, so on. However, in the 1650s to 1710s, Ruscia gets enveloped into a series of wars with the UK and Brandenburg (the UK being, effectively, England, Scotland, Ireland, and the Low Countries). These wars devastate Ruscia, and overall, they lose heavily. Soon after, when it looks like the Tsar is going to push Ruscia into yet another war, several of the Eastern states rebel, especially Muscovy and Novgorod. The Tsardom is split, and several of the rebels are allowed to leave, though Muscovy is not.

Following this, Ruscia enters into a series of civil wars, with more and more states breaking free. Minsk is conquered by the newly independent Muscovy, so the Tsar is forced to flee to Kiev. By the modern day, there are numerous states, including a Ruscian remainder, no longer a Tsardom but now an military autocracy, and the result of that coup is that Kiev was conquered too. This remainder controls very little land- effectively the strip between OTL modern Lithuania and OTL modern Estonia, with the capital of Kaunas.

Plausible?

           <span style="background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, right top, left top, from(#ffffff), to(#0000ff)); -webkit-border-radius: 36px 12px; -moz-border-radius: 36px / 12px; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 5px #ff0000; border:2px double #E5E4E2 border-radius:5px; border-bottom-right-radius:100px 90px; border-top-right-radius:100px 90px; color:#FFFFFF"> <font color="#FFffff" face="Arial">"Very funny, Scotty.   <font color="#000000" face="Arial" title="Bvlog">Now beam down my clothes."  14:04, February 3, 2013 (UTC)

Damn.

Could Minsk, rather than being annexed by Lithuania, become a powerful state on the line of Muscovy and Novgorod OTL?

<span style="-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%));"><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding-bottom:1px;padding-top:1px;-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#000000 45%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#CCCCFF 45%,#FF0000 50%));border-top-left-radius:500px 400px;border-bottom-left-radius:500px 400px">           <span style="background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, right top, left top, from(#ffffff), to(#0000ff)); -webkit-border-radius: 36px 12px; -moz-border-radius: 36px / 12px; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 5px #ff0000; border:2px double #E5E4E2 border-radius:5px; border-bottom-right-radius:100px 90px; border-top-right-radius:100px 90px; color:#FFFFFF"> <font color="#FFffff" face="Arial">"Very funny, Scotty.   <font color="#000000" face="Arial" title="Bvlog">Now beam down my clothes."  14:04, February 3, 2013 (UTC) Well, what other city could become the center of Russia? <span style="-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%));"><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding-bottom:1px;padding-top:1px;-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#000000 45%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#CCCCFF 45%,#FF0000 50%));border-top-left-radius:500px 400px;border-bottom-left-radius:500px 400px">           <span style="background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, right top, left top, from(#ffffff), to(#0000ff)); -webkit-border-radius: 36px 12px; -moz-border-radius: 36px / 12px; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 5px #ff0000; border:2px double #E5E4E2 border-radius:5px; border-bottom-right-radius:100px 90px; border-top-right-radius:100px 90px; color:#FFFFFF"> <font color="#FFffff" face="Arial">"Very funny, Scotty.   <font color="#000000" face="Arial" title="Bvlog">Now beam down my clothes."  00:45, February 5, 2013 (UTC) Smolensk, then. Sorry, temporary troubles with my signature. <span style="-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%));"><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding-bottom:1px;padding-top:1px;-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#000000 45%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#CCCCFF 45%,#FF0000 50%));border-top-left-radius:500px 400px;border-bottom-left-radius:500px 400px">           <span style="background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, right top, left top, from(#ffffff), to(#0000ff)); -webkit-border-radius: 36px 12px; -moz-border-radius: 36px / 12px; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 5px #ff0000; border:2px double #E5E4E2 border-radius:5px; border-bottom-right-radius:100px 90px; border-top-right-radius:100px 90px; color:#FFFFFF"> <font color="#FFffff" face="Arial">"Very funny, Scotty.   <font color="#000000" face="Arial" title="Bvlog">Now beam down my clothes."  23:02, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

My corrections to Ross Perot
Why did you undo my spelling corrections?

The words were misspelled.

EoGuy (talk) 16:02, February 2, 2013 (UTC)

EoGuy (talk) 16:02, February 2, 2013 (UTC)

<span style="-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%));"><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding-bottom:1px;padding-top:1px;-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#000000 45%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#CCCCFF 45%,#FF0000 50%));border-top-left-radius:500px 400px;border-bottom-left-radius:500px 400px">           <span style="background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, right top, left top, from(#ffffff), to(#0000ff)); -webkit-border-radius: 36px 12px; -moz-border-radius: 36px / 12px; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 5px #ff0000; border:2px double #E5E4E2 border-radius:5px; border-bottom-right-radius:100px 90px; border-top-right-radius:100px 90px; color:#FFFFFF"> <font color="#FFffff" face="Arial">"Very funny, Scotty.   <font color="#000000" face="Arial" title="Bvlog">Now beam down my clothes."  21:05, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

Imperialist America
Hey LG. I was wondering if there are any plausible POD's that would turn the United States into an imperialistic nation? Enclavehunter (talk) 02:13, February 2, 2013 (UTC)

Hey LG, Dean here, how have you been? (DeanSims: Talk) 06:03, February 3, 2013 (UTC)

Well thats good, glad to hear it. (DeanSims: Talk) 07:14, February 3, 2013 (UTC)

Denendeh again
Hope you have been doing well, LG (been a while since we last spoke).

Anyway, I do hope that you forgive me for bringing up this topic for the third (really second) time, but it just won't leave my mind. If you recall, I brought up the idea of British Alaska being united with the North-Western Territory to form a "Dominion of Denendeh," separate from Rupert's Land. You have brought up both times that it was too lowly populated to constitute an independent dominion. However, I believe I have found a loophole in this.

I have wrote an essay on the my argument. While I would like to hope that this will turn you around, I'm sure you may find a loophole of your own. Either way, I would love to get your opinion on this new insight, and I hope I don't bore you with my long essay. XP --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 17:34, February 3, 2013 (UTC)


 * Figures, I really thought I had something here.


 * Do you really believe that New Netherland (just for the sake of argument) would help fund railroads all the way to the Pacific. Wait... what am I talking about? Knowing NN, anything that makes a "cha-ching" sound would obviously get their attention, and the resources in NN and PA would be the obvious one-stop shop for the materials and money to do so. In which, case, let me restate the question: would the British want help from NN?


 * But having a railroad earlier does make sense, I just had no idea it would've been as much of a need, primarily because this would be the first trans-continental railroad with both connections having low populations (with no knowledge of what was to come in the region). So I would hope you can understand where I was coming from.


 * As for my comment about Alaska joining Columbia, I was only referring to this to state another British region not wanting a part in a vast dominion to back up my idea of further dividing British North America (I had no intention of actually proposing such a "Pacific Union").


 * Either way, thank you for your two cents. If you are cool with it, then I may bring this idea up again when I find another fact overlooked. But don't be surprised if you see this idea out somewhere else, because I do have another idea for it. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 19:20, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Talk:European Broadcasting Union (1983: Doomsday)
It seems like you know more than me about this issues. So, the article I've created must be deleted? If the article won't be deleted, do you know how to improve this article? I appreciate your answer. Halliwellroad (talk) 13:11, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Re:13FS PoD
Glad you like the POD idea (sorry for the delayed response).

While I admit any white population in Liberia would be infinitesimally small, I though it was made clear that Robert E. Lee would encourage the movement of the freed slaves to Liberia (or did I forget to mention this idea?). But like I said, it was a longshot idea at best (no worries).

When I made the statement about Virginia being segregated, I had no intention of that meaning today. But when Obama's father would go to the US OTL, it was during segregation. By today it would not mean the case.

You really think Carolina would still be segregated? I was under the impression that MLK and the Civil Rights Movement would still rise up in Carolina like OTL (just with a more aggressive government to fight). I would argue that by today, it would probably be pressured to happen. Or do you mean "segregation" in a different meaning? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:01, February 9, 2013 (UTC)


 * I am definitely shocked that segregation could still be happening in Carolina today, but at the same time I am not all that surprised. This just reminds me of South Africa and apartheid. However apartheid could be argued as being easier to overcome because the native population vastly outnumbered the white leadership, while Carolina is the opposite. A little sad to think about what could happen here because of which, but it does get me a little exited to think of the darkness of it. In short... definitely something I never thought about before. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 20:49, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

Yep, darkness seems to get a lot more appeal than happiness and sunshine (look at 1983, lol).

Now I wonder what LBJ would be like in this timeline (if he is indeed born and later leads Carolina). I guess the argument that his upbringing ATL would be different, but I have a feeling (at the very least) he would be moderate to somewhat liberal on the issue. Not sure what this could accomplish. Also, George Wallace would sure shine here (in more than one way). God this guy scares me. XP --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 03:12, February 12, 2013 (UTC)


 * Lol (glad to see he scares a lot of people). Oh well, wait 'til '72 (*epic foreshadowing*). I also have to consider Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Al Gore. I don't see these guys as being anything like those of the '50s and '60s (even with the environment being different). To be honest, I could see George W. Bush being more Carolinian then Al Gore (I feel bad for saying that). Got any thoughts on these guys?


 * Also as a bonus, I feel kinda bad that Florida ATL would not be "New New York" as I know it. I got a new idea for the timeline, New Netherland annexes Florida into their empire. What do you think? LOL. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 04:09, February 12, 2013 (UTC)

Sad.

I think Wallace makes a better Carolinian then a Virginian, so I don't think I am going to change anything involving him.

I would hope the Bushs would be assimilated into New York life (resistance is futile). So it anything, that comment was a joke.

I also do hope you know I absolutely had no intentions of annexing Florida here (I guess it wasn't that funny). But having lived here for 12 years, and being crammed Florida history during High School, I can conclude what East Florida would be like here. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 17:56, February 12, 2013 (UTC)


 * Wait... Gore would be Virginian? I did some research, and his family seems to be mixed. But I guess without a united country to move through, his ancestors would remain in Virginia (I will look into it more).


 * Guessed it wasn't that funny since you responded so seriously. Now what would have been hilarious would have been you saying something like: "well given the timing, New Netherland could probably take Florida easily." I was hoping you would have said that. XP But other than that, I do think I have an interesting idea for what East Florida would be like ATL (with West Florida being ATL Alabama T_T). --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:23, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Well I guess I can see him as Virginian (he was born in DC OTL... thought that would be Maryland).

Oh? You interested in Florida, eh! Well, it should be simple to figure out the timeline here. Norther Florida (St. Augustine, Tallahassee, etc) were settled first... by Southerners. This would obviously not change. Due to the heat and unexplored lands further south, they would most likely remain sparsely settled up until today (like OTL). The difference will be that it would be populated by mostly Southerners, instead of Northerners looking to get away from the snow. I could also potentially see Florida having the same "retirement" feel like OTL, just with old Southerners.

With no diaspora of Northerners into Florida, I could also see the ranchers (called "Crackers" [yes, they are]) who originally settled here to be a little happy. Much of Florida's early history was in ranching (in fact, Florida had the first cattle ranch in the nation, well before Texas), and it was the beef from Florida that helped feed the Confederate Army. With Northerners not pushing them gradually into the center (and even completely out), I could see EF having taking on the role of "Texas" in many respects. Though this would depend on how many really want to settle down there (or in my case... here).

I could also maybe see a diaspora of blacks settling in the furthest south, potentially as a means to live in somewhat equality from the apartheid much further north. This part of Florida does have a large Minority population, and with Cuba not becoming communist, it could just be populated by fleeing blacks.

That's what I had in mind, what do you think? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:59, February 15, 2013 (UTC)

Two questions...
Hello again Lordganon.

As the title suggests, I have two questions: Thanks.
 * 1) I have been told that you play or have experienced Victoria 2. I have an error that prevents me from playing it, and I was directed to you as being helpful in solving it.
 * 2) Can we make pages that are not associated with just one timeline, but several? For example, the Battle For Earth pages, is it within the rules to create a page for one of alien races that transends each game?

Monster Pumpkin (talk) 17:28, February 10, 2013 (UTC) Monster Pumpkin (talk) 22:39, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Thank you. I tried reinstalling, but it did no good.
 * 2) Darn. Oh well.

Thanx!
Thanx for fixing up the Land of Opportunity map game! I have no idea how you managed to do all that but you did! Daxus Inferno (talk) 03:52, February 12, 2013 (UTC)

Another question
Hello again.

I'm wondering if it be okay if I could put most of the Touhou images for deletion. I'm planning on just replacing most of the character images used in the articles with the ones from the official games. On ones that don't I'll be trying to find the original source of the image so I can credit the original artist and link to the source on the picture's page. For the rest that aren't really used on any articles, I'm going to put them up for deletion. -Kogasa  2013年2月14日 18:51:14 (JST)

South Africa idea for 13
How's it going?

I have been doing some reading on South Africa lately, and I think I have come up with an interesting idea involving South Africa for 13 Fallen Stars. However, given that my recent idea for an independent Rio Grande turned into a bust (I seriously thought it was workable), I would love to get a second opinion before I go any further. Don't want to find out later it too is a bust.

In short, my idea stems from the notion that the Cape Colony would remain Dutch, and thereby the British would have a weaker presence in the region. My idea (in the long run) would be that OTL South Africa would here be four sovereign states: the Dutch Cape Colony, the British Colony of Natal, and the Boer Republics of Transvaal and the OFS (more or less like the four provinces of Apartheid South Africa).

The overall history would be that (obviously) the Dutch keep the Cape, because there would be no Napoleonic War. From what I recent read (both from OTL history and alternate history discussions), it would appear that the Boers (the rural farmers of Dutch decent) would still migrate out of the Cape. In OTL this was due to the British, but here it would be based on the centralization of the colony by the Dutch. With the British not getting the cape, they would most likely attempt a colonial grab in Natal (which appears to already be canon on this timeline), which would push the Boers to the northeast (like OTL).

Over time, they establish two independent republics. Like both did in OTL, I would suspect that the Dutch and the Brits would recognize their independence, since the regions they claimed had little value at the time, and because they opened the way to the interior. I don't believe the Dutch would act aggressively towards their own, and I don't believe the British would have much gain in antagonizing conflict in the region (especially if Natal's importance begins to dwindle after the creation of the Suez Canal).

With the discovery of diamonds in the area, a rush would take place (like OTL), with the Dutch ultimately gaining the majority of these mines (as did the British OTL).

That is about what I have at the moment. Again, I don't want to go much further if this idea is a dud. Overall, I think the Dutch would have little reason to bother the Boer Republics, especially if they can prove useful (off the top of my head: act as a buffer between the Cape and the Portuguese, or to prevent British expansion, maybe sounding stupid). I am debating on whether the Cape Colony would eventually declare independence (like OTL-ish), and that Natal would become part of the UBC.

I do hope this idea is workable. So forgive me if I made absolutely no sense at all. But either way, I do look forward to your opinion. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 05:34, February 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * I hope you are doing okay.


 * From what I have read about the Boers, they were semi-nomadic and were against any type of authority. While maybe comparing it completely to OTL was a bad way to go, they still sound like those who were going to move, irregardless of who was in control (it wasn't under the Dutch or British control). If anything, it would be like comparing the migration west in US history.


 * But if this idea still sounds stupid to you, than can you think of any way this could be workable? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 05:03, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

Well whatever happens, do what you have to do. I do wish you luck on it.


 * The primary reason I am interested in the Boer republics existing was because of a theme I have been trying to do on this timeline: that OTL federations are not united (a la the USA). While this area is tricky, I assumed that given the distance from the Cape, and the fact that it was just for settlement (and had no value until much later), I believed that the Dutch (like the British) would allow them independence or (at the least) greater autonomy.


 * Your explanation did just give me an idea, though not too sure how workable it would be. Keep the idea, but change the timing. The treks still happen, but for different reasons. They remain somewhat autonomous entities. By the time the Dutch end slavery and begin moves towards equality, these regions wont take kindly to it and would declare independence (a la the South). Given the distances, and the readiness of the Boers (I have read that they were packed to the teeth with guns [I know it sounds out of context, but hear me out]), they would be able to thwart off the Dutch (more or less like they did towards the British in the first Boer War).


 * Don't know what you will think of this idea. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:51, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

My Sig
No problem! This is the last use of the current form of the sug. :)

<span style="-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(#FFFFFF 50%,#FFFFFF 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(#FFD700 50%,#000000 50%));"><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding-bottom:1px;padding-top:1px;-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#1C39BB 45%,#120A8F 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#CCCCFF 45%,#000000 50%));border-top-left-radius:500px 400px;border-bottom-left-radius:500px 400px">               <span style="background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, right top, left top, from(#000000), to(#FFFFFF)); -webkit-border-radius: 36px 12px; -moz-border-radius: 36px / 12px; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 5px #000000; border:2px double #E5E4E2 border-radius:5px; border-bottom-right-radius:100px 90px; border-top-right-radius:100px 90px; color:#FFFFFF"> <font color="#FF033E" face="Courier">"Fear the power   <font color="#FF033E" face="Courier" title="Bvlog"> of the Dark Side of the Force."  05:06, February 21, 2013 (UTC)

hey!
WHY ARE YOU DELETEING MY PAGE? Chao101 (talk) 10:32, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

like what rules exactly? Chao101 (talk) 00:46, February 23, 2013 (UTC)

SA... again
Well, here is another map of how South Africa might look. I have changed the border thing in some areas, so its more "natural".

I was really wondering, however, whether Waterboersland would have expanded more, considering there would be more Africans arriving from the chaos and and there would be more propagation and stuff...

And I wanted to ask about the OFS. Would they expand more through the small window of expansion they have?

Just a few points I was wondering about (hope the new map is better) :P  Imp (Say Hi?!) 21:01, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

Righty. I've updated the map, and hopefully you'll see tha I have expanded borders normally and not using the provice divide things. If you approve, I'll fix up the map properly. So how is the map now? Imp (Say Hi?!) 20:47, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

BTW, is the OFS allowed to use the port facilities of KwaZulu? As this would allow them to send expeditions and get survivors over from the Netherlands. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 20:51, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

Ah, well. So there would not be that many whites there, correct? Or are there tonnes of whites in the country as most of them survived and reproduced?

On the map, the Azanian League can only expand in the west/south westernly area as they are blocked by other countries around them. Got a new map about their borders. Hows it now? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 17:29, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Isiro
Well, here we go. The rebellion hath started. Democratie Pour Isiro will become a reality. What would happen here as a result of the rebellion? I imagine a significant portion of the military would join in? And would the government after become a genuine democracy or a dictatorship? Which is more plausible? Actually, would the rebels win? Or would some sort of compromise be reached; a constitutional monarchy?

<span style="-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%));"><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding-bottom:1px;padding-top:1px;-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#000000 45%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#CCCCFF 45%,#FF0000 50%));border-top-left-radius:500px 400px;border-bottom-left-radius:500px 400px">           <span style="background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, right top, left top, from(#ffffff), to(#0000ff)); -webkit-border-radius: 36px 12px; -moz-border-radius: 36px / 12px; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 5px #ff0000; border:2px double #E5E4E2 border-radius:5px; border-bottom-right-radius:100px 90px; border-top-right-radius:100px 90px; color:#FFFFFF"> <font color="#FFffff" face="Arial">"Very funny, Scotty.   <font color="#000000" face="Arial" title="Bvlog">Now beam down my clothes."  00:39, February 27, 2013 (UTC)a a

Hmm. Fine, ok. But perhaps faking a democracy? Rest of the world takes hope, Isiro applies- and is eventually granted- Observer status to the LoN? Then, of course the real facts come out....

By the way, does the 'rollback powers' the constables are granted involve the ability to undo any edits? Because for some reason, I'm able to do that... <span style="-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%));"><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding-bottom:1px;padding-top:1px;-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#000000 45%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#CCCCFF 45%,#FF0000 50%));border-top-left-radius:500px 400px;border-bottom-left-radius:500px 400px">           <span style="background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, right top, left top, from(#ffffff), to(#0000ff)); -webkit-border-radius: 36px 12px; -moz-border-radius: 36px / 12px; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 5px #ff0000; border:2px double #E5E4E2 border-radius:5px; border-bottom-right-radius:100px 90px; border-top-right-radius:100px 90px; color:#FFFFFF"> <font color="#FFffff" face="Arial">"Very funny, Scotty.   <font color="#000000" face="Arial" title="Bvlog">Now beam down my clothes."

Me again
Hows it going? I have another idea that I would love to get your feedback on. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 03:07, March 4, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your feedback.


 * Forgive me, but I truly hope you are mistaken about Canada. It has been canon for years now that Canada gains independence and is a republic. I got no complaints when I first proposed the idea years ago, and I have not gotten any complaints until now. We even discussed this a few weeks back, and you had no complaints then. Again, I do hope this is a mistake. But either way, I have no intention of changing what has been canon for years. So I would appreciate it that you not correct me on this topic. Please and thank you. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:34, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

I believe I have made mention of this to you before. When we were discussing an Imperial Federation, I made mention that I wasn't comfortable of you referring to Canada as part of this federation (as they were "not part of the British Empire anymore"), and your response was that you were only using that word for simplicity. I though I was being clear, but looking back, I could see how it could have been missed. I do apologize for crossing out your comment, I had no idea it would upset you. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:58, March 6, 2013 (UTC)


 * Again, I do apologize for that. I seriously thought that was pretty straight forward when I wrote it, but I guess I wasn't thinking.


 * Now that I think of it, my original intentions for Canada was that the British don't divide the original Province of Quebec, meaning that when revolution breaks out among the Quebekers in the 1830s, it and Louisiana (who rebelled around the same time) gain full independence. But as I continued to do some reading, I came across that it was pretty much inevitable that the province was going to be divided, as loyalists were flooding the area from the USA (leading to the English-dominated Upper Canada), so I reworked this into it.


 * If it helps any, weren't the loyalists during the American Revolution more or less the majority? I watched a video a while back which was talked about this, and yet here we are as a republic. I also don't see why some settlement by Virginians, Pennsylvanians, and even New Englanders in the NWT would be unheard of. The territory was still claimed as "American", but would gradually fall to a British control (the areas not won by VA and PA that is). New England would not sell the their claims until the early 1800s, and given how quick other NE claims (OTL) like Cleveland, OH, had done, it wouldn't surprise me if NE began gradual moves to colonize their territory.


 * Virginia and Pennsylvania (as you mentioned a long while back) were moving into the area no matter what, and I don't think it would surprise me that many would move into areas that wound up not being part of their government after the NW War. Given the time and effort to get where they were, I would guess that a good number wouldn't just pack up and move back, and would probably just remain where they were.


 * As time progressed, and the French began to revolt, I could see that the decedents of these "Americans" may support more autonomy and may even fight to gain it. I was even thinking of an event (more for novelty than actually doing it) that Mackenzie would have suggested admitting Toronto and the area west of the Niagara river as a new state of New Netherland (again, this is not a real idea, but a quark of history). With "Americans" in Charlotina, and the French in "Quebec", it shouldn't be impossible to assume that the Tories in "Ontario" would be sandwiched between revolution.


 * I also have to ask why you think some of the American state wouldn't support a revolution there? While I could see New England defiantly being neutral in such an event due to good relations, I personally don't see New Netherland and Virginia having such positive relations. In fact, I see these two in particular having similar tensions with London as the US did OTL. Remember, Britain supported the loss of Vermont from NN, and the loss of the majority of the NWT from Virginia. Combined with the fact that most from these states (OTL) were not fond of the British OTL (with a Virginian declaring the War of 1812), I doubt they would have friendly relations after this. While I doubt there would be as much tension as OTL's USA, tension would still exist (but would get better quicker over the century). I bet they would see positives of having an independent Canada (buffer state, Great Lakes, weakening the Brits) as something worth supporting to a degree, but it wouldn't have gone far enough to gain government support (a la Texas Revolution).


 * If not for them, there is always the French. Remember, still heavily in debt, the French went out of their way to support the independence of the USA. With the French Revolution being a failure, I could see many revolutionaries fleeing France and winding up in North America (Louisiana especially), but also Canada. The revolutionaries would spread their message, and the next generation would lead revolutions in French Louisiana and French Canada. I also don't see why the French themselves wouldn't support Canada. Remember, the French despised the Brits (revolution or not), and why wouldn't they support their own people in getting away from the British?


 * But given what has been said, I will relook into how such a Canada is governed. I chose a federation because of its vast size, but this was before we made Borealia a unitary state within an imperial federation. I suppose a unitary state (based on the (OTL) French/Virginian model) could be supported, or something different entirely is adopted. As you mentioned, the failure of the Americans to federalize showed its failure, and its not like the Brits had allowed these colonies much more federalization than what the others would get. I will look into this.


 * Also, you don't need to worry about other bits of advice you gave me, because I doubt there would be any real difference between this and that. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 19:18, March 7, 2013 (UTC)

I believe this whole situation is very distressing for me. Given my luck of having all my ideas for the past few months come of fruitless, it shouldn't really be surprise me that one of my first ideas upon taking this timeline should now come up as being garbage, and that everything I thought was straightforward is actually worthless. All I can think of now is what else did I do that will turn out to have been another waist of time on my part.

I still don't know what I am going to do about this new insight, but either way I feel upset thinking about changing this, or changing other things to keep it (a loose-loose situation). So forgive me if I am upset at this. I don't think I am going to bother with new ideas for quite a while, and just focus on one thing that is safe to add to. Either way, thank you for your help. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 04:12, March 10, 2013 (UTC)


 * Don't worry about it. Given all the time and effort I put into to an idea and to have it proven wrong in a shorter period of time, is enough to get anyone depressed. That and other problems facing me and my family at the present also have say here.


 * Either way, I am taking a break from all this heavy work and looking into new ways to expand my timelines, and I am going to stick to one thing for a while. I have already been doing much needed work on the New Netherland article which makes me happy. I still have no idea what I am going to do about the "Canada issue," but probably just going to have it be a part of the UC in the end, but it is a little upsetting to remove years of work. Again, no need to worry about it. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:08, March 13, 2013 (UTC)

World War II Alternate History
Hey LG. I want to develope an alternate World War II history, with a Nazis and Japanese Victory, but not wanting it to be biased. Is there any plausible POD's before the war or during the war that could allow such a victory? Enclavehunter (talk) 05:26, March 6, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for this being so late...
Anywaym to respond to your questions, tha game manages to load all the way to the final loading screen, then this pops up. CreateVertexDeclaration failed! (ProvinceVertexDecl) Then the game cannot load any further, and I cannot find any help on the internet on this specific error.

Monster Pumpkin (talk) 17:54, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Louisiana
Kinda surprised to see you hear so early. I am relieved to hear that it sounds okay. I will look into it later.

Since I have you, mind if I as a Canada question. Though this is how the map has been and I have not gotten any comments against it, I want to be sure that Canada (being part of this United Commonwealth) would still be its own entity, not having been merged into Borealia (which has what is Northwestern Canada and Alaska). I want to be sure, though this would obviously exclude Labrador which already went to Newfoundland. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 03:22, March 14, 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, it's nice to talk without a day lag. XD


 * I am well aware of the boundary dispute. As to what you are getting at, I don't follow. If looking at the issue with a "statehood" mentality (i.e., what helped define border disputes between the 13 Colonies OTL), I guess it could be possible that Canada gains the better deal as they were a dominion earlier than Newfoundland. But at the same time, Canada has a lot more "valuable" territory (nothing against Labrador) that Newfoundland could be seen as worthy to gain its border. Or in short, what do you mean? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 05:49, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

It's seems rather silly for Quebec to continue a border dispute. But I will look into this more.



Since I still have you, I wanted to see if I am on the right track with South Africa here. What I am thinking of now would have two Dutch "dominions" in South Africa, and Natal including the eastern-most parts. The Anglo-Dutch border I chose is a straight line marking the easternmost reach of the Dutch by 1795, gives the British all the diamonds in the east, gives them Swaziland and Lesotho, and about divides the "Bore Republics" in what you said (OFS being two-thirds Dutch and one-third British). I also extended the border north for the Dutch (since Botswana would by far be different), and I believe Natal wouldn't go any further than that, as the Portuguese had their eyes in a land corridor between Mozambique and Angola. I have no idea what you are going to make of it. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 22:23, March 14, 2013 (UTC)


 * Glad to hear that this is somewhat workable. I don't have a blank map per say, but you can Google one. Either way, I may want to relook at it myself.


 * Just to see if it still holds water... you did say to me "Now, the Dutch may well set up some sort of separate administration further inland. Brits did it there otl, so it makes sense for the Dutch to do it atl", so why are you now telling me otherwise? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 04:17, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

I had no idea me lowering the opacity was a deal breaker here. Since my old version is outdated, I uploaded the same file as being blank. Feel free to just upload your version on that file, and I will replace it with a detailed version down the way.

Well that bites, I was really hoping to have at least some type of salvage from my original idea of multiple Dutch colonies there. And the fact that parts of Namibia will be added only make me see the need to have multiple dominions. And while the "Bores" wouldn't exist here, I still see many moving inland as a means to have "privacy" would favor a division. But whatever, I'll get over it.

As for using rivers as the border, I really don't see it. I'd prefer to use that straight line to divide the Brits and the Dutch. Given the fact that the Brits could probably take more if they wanted to, I believe the Dutch would be willing to give up a little bit in order to have a defined border (as you said, it wouldn't be much of a loss). And if for anything, it is much easier to draw.

As for moving the border further south, I have nothing against it (I just knew that northernmost border was used at one time); and for the Brits gaining parts of Mozambique, as long as the Portuguese don't mind, I don't.

But either way, let me see what you have in mind, and I can work from there. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 05:08, March 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * I believe the map of North America is just about done, but I have a few more questions that I would like to get your views on.


 * First off, you mentioned that Cuba (and the Philippines) would become independent, but you failed to mention Puerto Rico. Would they become independent or remain with Spain?


 * Lastly are on the French territories in the Caribbean: Haiti and the West Indies. Do you think they would remain with France (more or less under a similar union as OTL) or gain independence in some form? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:11, March 18, 2013 (UTC)

Glad I could help (I hate bullies). I also had no idea a thousand years was even an option. I would also state that he also went to my home wiki to ask why I blocked him (but I blocked him there as well). But either way, hard to say how long to block someone depending on what they do.

Thank you for your feedback. I will look into whether Puerto Rico gains independence or not, and I had really no doubt that the French West Indies would remain French.

My only follow up would be Haiti, I don't fully get what you mean. Since you state you hope it is less violent, I assume you mean they would likely gain independence. Nothing against that, but when do you believe they would leave? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:50, March 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * Yeah, but I believe I took care of it. Hopefully he leaves us alone.


 * So Haiti would gain independence more or less around the same time it did OTL, just you hope it would be less violent. I can work from there.


 * I also have a [don't want to say an "idea", but more of a question], you mentioned that rebels flee and stir up trouble in Haiti. If the rebels are successful, wouldn't we maybe see a Haiti still run by white slave owners and retains slavery (at least for a time being). I am just going back to Carolina, and you mentioning that they help out Cuban independence; this also makes me think whether or not Carolina would support keeping a White-dominated Haiti as an ally (meaning Carolina helps keep the status quo in the event of a slave rebellion). I could maybe see Louisiana help out if the time is right. Again, I don't want to say this is an idea, but the outcome I see when combining Haitian independence lead by fleeing rebels.


 * What do you mean by "stub." If you are referring to making it canon, than I am all for that. If you wish to open it for others to expand upon, I am not for that. I still have a lot to finish up, but it will get done sooner or later. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:38, March 19, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to say, but I believe I am more confused than ever in regards to Haiti. I have done more reading on the Haitian Revolution, and it only makes be have more questions. Most importantly, would they even include the whole island? I believe it was you who mentioned that it was likely it would include the entire island, but I believe I have found controdiction (at least from what I previously thought). I read that the French controlled the entire island from 1795 to 1804, but the French Revolution would be crushed in 1792 (as mentioned in the timeline). What do you make of this?

Though after doing more reading, I may have come out with a quick timeline that may work here. The revolution goes as planed in France, the slave revolt also happens on schedule in 1791. The rebellion is crushed in 1792, but the slave revolt and conflict in the colony continue. Somewhat like OTL, peace/detente is achieved between France and the colonial residence. Slavery is abolished, and a black-lead government is established. Detente between the slaves and former slave owners is achieved, and a period of peace happens (more or less like OTL). No Napoleon allows this detente to last a bit longer, with the King of France allowing some autonomy as they can't do much at the time. Rebels flee to the island, and spread independence among the already independence-pron island. Revolution sparks again (some time prior to 1810), gaining independence from France. Most likely, the name "Haiti" would be adopted as the name of this new nation. During the chaos of the early Latin American rebellions, Haiti is able to seize control of the entire island.

Not sure what you think. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 00:34, March 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * I see. Like I said, it is pretty confusing coming at it from a limited knowledge. Thank you for clearing some things up. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 18:12, March 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * Also (because I completely forgot), if you would like to make my Shoreham article canon now, that has my support.


 * I also wanted to get your opinion on users here who have flags/files as part of their signature. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 19:50, March 21, 2013 (UTC)

Glad to hear it.

I was only curious because I believe Wikipedia doesn't allow them, and I have been seeing more users using them. But not much I can do about it. But if they are using duplicates, don't be too surprised that their signatures would have dead file links (because it would be insane to correct every single comment they have made).

Glad to see that my Russian monarchy lineup is okay. Since my presidential lineup for New Netherland is more or less done, I wanted to get a look at the monarchies. Not sure if you have looked, but many just seem completely made up and have no historic backing (especially Britain's).

As much as I would like to read about the reign of Tsar Alexei, I know it wasn't going to happen. Either way, I will continue to play around. Also, who's Paul? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:02, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

Just as a heads up, I blocked a user for harassing me. I wrote about it on the TSPTF talk page. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:54, March 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but I have felt quite frazzled for the past day. I didn't want to write it on the talk because I believe he may have been watching. But I believe that guy also used multiple IPs to vandalize my homepage. I know it doesn't have anything to do with here, but I felt it appropriate to at least tell you. I reported this to Wikia but I have yet to receive a response, and I don't know whether he is done or not. I am rather surprised he didn't do it here as well.


 * As for the other things. Would Paul still be assassinated as OTL? And I told you, I have no idea what that guy was thinking. Though I do have to say that the use of "William" for six consecutive monarchs must be a record. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:34, March 24, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, that is pretty much what I though (too coincidental). That is why I removed it from my user page here. Not too sure that blocking the many IPs he used is going to help. I would block one, and he would just find another one. Again, I am surprised he didn't go on a vandalizing spree here as well. And Pita brought it up, but it wouldn't surprise me that the only reason he contacted me was to troll me. Also, hope you weren't too creeped out at my site. XP

I still couldn't guess what the original author had in mind (he also made up some Presidents for New England and such). I will probably get to all of them eventually.

The only one I may have interest in getting out of the way early (aside from Russia) is Britain (which is now the UC). Given what I know about the monarchy of the UK, I don't believe much would change from OTL. Aside from the "House of Windsor" not existing (unless anti-German sentiment would develop here), I still believe the lineup would be about the same. The only variable would be Edward VIII, who I believe would probably be the same ATL (he didn't show much interest in being King, and married who he wanted to). But I would like to get your thoughts.

Also speaking of the UC, what do you believe Hanover's place in the United Commonwealth would be (since they had a personal union with the UK that lasted until the 1830s [IIRC]). Or would they leave and be on their own today.

If Micheal follows Nicholas eventually, than his son would follow him. I do know Micheal had a son OTL (George), but he was not to inherit the thrown because he was born from a mistress (who was legally married to someone else). Unless it changes over time, than I suppose another (fictional) son (or daughter would be interesting) would follow, and the rest of Russian Tsars would be made up (no changing that).

If that be the case, I would want to avoid another "Alexander" and "Nicholas." I also though maybe an "Alexei" may pop up (maybe Michal names his son in honor of his nephew). Just a thought. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:54, March 25, 2013 (UTC)


 * House of Mountbatten? Hm.


 * So the personal union would just end like OTL? No problem there.


 * I never considered the power of a monarch to make rules (still a republican, after all). Interesting to see what George would do, hopefully not dying in a car crash in Paris. I will work on the successors from there (probably the only time making up names is workable).


 * Just a heads up, I will probably be posting my updated map of Europe. I will probably post the new discussion in a few days.


 * I hope you don't mind me starting up a new conversation, but I have been thinking about it lately. While I plan on getting to Asia here at some point, I have been getting curious as to the development of China here.


 * Yank is pretty much to blame for me thinking about this. As of right now, the timeline states that China is divided among several powers (much like India and Africa to a degree). A while back (I believe it was him, though I could be wrong) he made mention that China would probably not be divided up and would be whole by today. But recently, I added Hong Kong as a potential dominion for the United Commonwealth (just to add a list of British possessions that I would look into later). Shortly after I posted that, he wrote me and questioned whether or not Hong Kong would actually be part of the larger "British China" mentioned in the timeline.


 * This gave me an idea (I still don't want to use that word XP), which would also work with another idea I was having. Since making the Imperial Federation canon, I have been wondering how the non-settler colonies (India, Nigeria, etc.) would function in this union. Given their population and non-white majority, I doubt they would be added as dominions; but I also doubt that London would just give them independence (without a fight that is). I was considering that maybe they would be given independence as OTL Australia and Canada have today; in which they keep the monarchy and remain in a Commonwealth Realm, but are granted some independence from London.


 * Anyway, I was thinking about whether or not Hong Kong could be the hub of a British-backed Cantonese "realm".


 * But before I get too deep into this, I would first like to get your opinion as to what China would look like here. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 01:22, March 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * Just a quick question (because I honestly forgot), do you still intend to make my Shoreham page canon? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 04:03, March 28, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that. But if any consolation, I am also having a hectic week.

Like I've said before, I am a republic so the notion of "rulers changing laws to ensure an heir" is rather odd (reminds me Henry VIII... or Putin). So forgive me if this is still news to me.

I haven't put total thought as for heirs. Though I do have a benchmark I wish to keep. First off, I want to avoid another "Alexander" or "Nicholas" (think there has been enough for a century). I am more looking towards a name that hasn't been used in a while (like "Ivan" or "Peter") or a new one (I kinda like "Cyril" as a potential name). I don't believe I will be making a Tsaritsa (Queen/Empress), especially because I may have my eye on Yulia Tymoshenko as a potential Prime Minister by today (but I will look into PMs later).

A dead ringer. I recall he messaged me twice about my absence from this timeline. But we all have our flaws.

I had a feeling it wasn't to be (too populated to even touch). You know my response to a republic, but it depends. I also wanted to mention this before (but a combination of patients and me forgetting it), this brings me back to Russia. While depending on Japan, do you believe Russia could gain Manchuria, Mongolia, and East Turkestan over time? Also Tibet?

Really? India a dominion? From what I read and (IIRC) what you said a while back, London and the rest wouldn't favor Indian admission due in part to its population (if given equal voting rights, the British Empire would become the Indian Empire). Nothing against Indian admission (mind you), just that this is definitely a game changer in what I was thinking. It would be treated like a settler colony? Does that mean a South Africa-like government (dominated by whites while the Indians are left out)? If India is in, which colonies would be left out (aside from Egypt). My guess (from what I know), would the British Arab states (Yemen, Oman, UAR, etc) be on this list?

No need to worry. Thank you again for making it canon. I do hope to get around to finishing it soon. I plan on at least finishing the history, and adding sections to the mechanics of the plant, as well as opinion and domestics towards its operation. It should be great. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:59, March 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * Glad to hear it. Ignoring work and family issues at the present, I did have my website vandalized a week ago, so there is plenty to be stressed about. But working here does make me happy, so there's that.


 * I actually came across an article talking about the Queen's move for gender equality, and this will indeed be an interesting move (especially if William and Kate have a daughter).


 * "Sergey" sounds like an interesting name (will look into it). Funny you should find it funny. I came across the name "Cyril" from that particular "Cyril". Aside from that, I thought it sounded good (especially in the... "Cyrilic" alphabet [YEAH!]).


 * I do agree that Manchuria depends on Japan. I have been thinking about whether to reintroduce this idea, and maybe it could work here? I originally thought of it for this timeline, but I ultimately recycled it into Russian America (only to abandon it there as well). The idea is simple, Russia and Japan agree to define their spheres of influence, with Russia gaining Manchuria and Japan gaining Korea (they did this OTL between Sakhalin and the Kurils). Japan gets a foothold on the mainland and a buffer from Russia, while Russia gets a year-round port to the Pacific. Does this sound workable here?


 * I will look into China later. You know my stance towards a republic (i.e., yes), but will look into it later.


 * If you think it's workable, than I have nothing against India. My only question is whether or not India would also include Pakistan and Bangladesh, or would it be divided into even smaller states.


 * Definitaly going to be odd to have monarchies in a monarchy (YO DAWG). Would the UAE be divided into its emirates, or would the entire "Trucial States" be one dominion? Can't put my finger on Cyprus.


 * Nice to see you are aware of my cycles. Ironically, I feel that I have been spending too much time on 13, and I am not sure why? Probably because it has a lot to get done, and much of my other ones are (more or less) done by comparison. Nothing against it, this one needs work. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:41, March 30, 2013 (UTC)

Really? Haven't heard about the "daughter remark." Only time will tell.

Glad that the dates work. Since you said the Romanov's die young, I averaged it to around his 70s for George, and the same for his son, and gradually getting longer as time and medicine gets better. But the names are still a work in progress. I may ditch "Cyril" because it seems out of place at the moment, and I may have the recent Tsar be named Sergey as well (I came across the fact that Sergey was quite popular in the '80s OTL). But I will work on the finalization later.

Um... you do remember that one of the main reasons Russia was interested in Manchuria was to acquire the ports of and  (both of which are on the Liaodong Peninsula). These ports would assure Russia year-round access to the Pacific, and this would most likely be on Russia's requirements for any treaty to settle border disputes. Giving the peninsula (and the ports) to Japan kinda defeats the purpose &mdash; especially when Korea (let alone Japan) have plenty of ports to choose from.

So Pakistan would not be a part of India. I hope this would also mean better relations between the two ATL. But for a follow-up; do you mean separate in that Pakistan becomes its own dominion, or that they become independent?

Not that I'm against the idea, just that it's all new to me. If it is workable OTL, than I see nothing wrong with it here (not that it matters completely, the local parliaments would allow democracy). Speaking of Lesotho and Swaziland, I just wanted to clarify that they would not exist here (as they are morphed into Natal). I forgot to bring this up a while back, but since you seemed more anxious for Walvis Bay and not these two, I am to assume they are absorbed.

The UAE would actually be crown colonies? Does sound fishy to me (but what do I know). Personally, I think they should be united (Qatar and Bahrain as well) into a single "Dominion of Khaleej" (especially since it is being slowly populated by Indians). But that's me. XP

Nothing against a divided Cyprus (wouldn't be the first island to be divided). As for the Greco-Turkish border, I will leave that for the continued discussion on Europe (which I will post in a few days). I had a few ideas for Turkey that I would like to discuss, but I will be sure to add a divided Cyprus before I post it.

It hasn't failed me yet. The only downside (and annoyance) is that the timelines I am not working on tend to become more active when I am not in the "zone" for them (e.g., what's his name's electoral template for New Union). Real life seems to do that to. While working on DD... Hurricane Sandy hits New York. Now that I am on 13, a meteorite explodes over Russia and North Korea becomes active. It's like I can't win. LOL. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 03:38, March 31, 2013 (UTC)


 * Really? There's bets on this?


 * Well I haven't finalized anything, yet. So I can't say what I plan to use name-wise. But I will work on those later.


 * It would also depend on the timing. By the late 1890s, Russia pushed to have those ports be theirs (only to loose them in war). So it would have to be done earlier (when would you think would be the right year?). I like how you are trying to convince me of the superiority of those other ports (it's working). However, my main fondness of Dalny is because of the name (it just sounds cool for a Russian city). From what I have recently read, many in Russia were opposed to the construction of Dalny (due in part to those other mentioned ports already existing). If they were to put the same amount of effort into say Yingkou, then it should be just as good a city. Though my only problem is the name. Would you have any objections to be calling it "Dalny" (because I do love that name; maybe it comes out in simplicity to Russia leaving Dalian).


 * Wow, you are still full of surprises. Love the map, but let me see if I can get it straight. All but Pakistan and Burma would become dominions (excluding Bhutan, Sikkim, Tripura, and Manipur; which become crown colonies). Portugal and France retain their parts (with the Dutch and Danish get bought out), and Afghanistan gains a little more. I don't see anything wrong with this, but I know little about Indian history to really give any critique on this other than I like it.


 * Am I detecting an Edwards supporter? (LOL) Allow me to explain. Excluding New Netherland (which I would have had to be crazy not to have Rudy be President), the remaining American Republics I just randomly chose a leader to (at the least) be temporary. Recently I changed New England to John Kerry, and Pennsylvania to Hillary Clinton (I know she won't be called "Clinton" here, but details). Virginia and Maryland are trickier to figure out (because OTL governors have a vastly different agenda then the president of a nation), and Virginia doesn't have any notable candidates that I know of (aside from Al Gore, who probably would have had his terms by now).


 * Huckabee just popped in my head the other night, and his ancestry (not to mention politics) just seem to scream "Carolina", so I though he would be better than Edwards (who I just chose randomly). Nothing against him, I'm sure he would have been an interesting President, but I believe Huckabee would probably beat Edwards in an election. The only interesting thing I can think of would be if Edwards' had the same legal issues during his presidency. Combined with Bill Clinton, Carolina would have have an active presidency in that regard. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 00:56, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for the delayed response. I am just getting over the flu (it is just as wonderful as it sounds).

I will look more into Manchuria to get an idea, but I do love how you are trying to sell these other ports to me.

Japan is going to be an odd one to figure out &mdash; especially since I know little about Japan. Imagine all the topics I have worked on here, and the two main ones that caused debates were that I didn't know about Matthew C. Perry, and that I stayed away from DD (go figure). Depending on what New England would do ATL (since Perry is from Rhode Island), they could maybe open up relations with Japan. But no matter what, the Russians were next after Perry.

Lol. So you are telling me that the only reason you brought him up was to say that he would be Carolinian? Forgive me, but this is a perfect time for a "thank you Captain Obvious!" (he was born in North Carolina, after all XD). In all seriousness, the only reason I chose him was because he would be Carolinian. I knew nothing about his politics and character (I even think I put his name on there before his trial), and I was going to look into him more and/or replace him sooner or later.

Given how I am seeing Carolina as a nation &mdash; a conservative, Christian nation that is too stubborn to move on &mdash; I feel that Huckabee would be a better personification than Edwards (at least at the present). But given his age, Edwards would maybe pop up in the future (depending on how he acts here).

What I was referring to with Maryland was that I though if similar to OTL, the Presidents ATL would correspond to Governors OTL. With that, Maryland would be run by younger, inexperienced politicians. But after looking into it more, it appears that (at least recently) many of Maryland's leaders would be okay (age wise). --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:25, April 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * Hank Green did a video recently for Crash Course, and it was talking about the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans (and since New England would be pretty much a Federalist haven, this should apply here). Aside from wanting positive relations with the British, the Federalists also wanted to become a maritime trading power. Given that New England would also go towards Antarctica (as we discussed previously), I don't see it as too far-fetched that New England makes it to Japan. Though the question on whether Perry would be as persuasive as OTL could be in question. Maybe minor trading rights would be established, but Japan remains isolationist (for a while).


 * I do remember reading that it was a Russian &mdash; &mdash; who lead an expedition to open up Japan to Russian trade. He arrived one month after Perry (making Russia the next in line). Japan was moved to open relations with Russia after Perry. Depending on what Perry does here, maybe it's Putyatin who takes the role of Perry in relations. What do you think?


 * To be honest, I am not all that surprised about a New Englander ancestry in Columbia. And to show how my brain works, the first thing I am questioning is whether this would "hurt" Columbia legalizing marijuana ATL. I have actually been considering how religion in New England would affect the independent republics. It was many religious movements originating from New England that pushed abolitionism and prohibition in the US. From what I can make out, I believe only Carolina and New England would actually prohibit alcohol at some point, with the others leaving it for the regions to decide (not being on a federal level).


 * Hm... didn't really think about that. For simplicity, I usually leave ancestry alone when they are born in one of the Thirteen States. I sill feel bad that I haven't been putting much effort into Maryland (in fact, I know little about the state aside from crab cakes and Ace of Cakes). --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 01:27, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Logical
on DD1983  Linz, Austria has a huge steel mill and oil refineries. Baoji China is home to to the 21st army group that defenses the northeast of china. So why are they not logical targets? Iwaschris (talk) 02:22, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

I won't bother trying anymore but am curiuos, why the two of the  largest munutions facilities wouldn't  get nuked,or Ft Rucker that has more assets and is the home to Army aviation  than say Ft Irwin, CA which is nothing by a desert training center. Iwaschris (talk) 13:46, March 17, 2013 (UTC)

Also, I can't find any reference to the HQ of the Lanzhou Miliary Region being in city of Lanzhou every place I look shows Baoji being the HQ and location of most units for the 21st Group Army units, with my sources including the Globalsecurity.org. Can you please let me know what your sources are for future reference. Iwaschris (talk) 20:02, March 17, 2013 (UTC)

You should take your own advice and google Lanzhou Military Region comes up the same Baoji is the HQ.

Second the the unit that is stationed in Ft Irwin are older vechicle that are Modified to look like soviet vechicles and play the role of the opfor  the unit training there are on a base that is 7000 sq miles and could be anywhere. so nuking them would be hard.

But I won't bother you on this issue again. Iwaschris (talk) 10:36, March 18, 2013 (UTC)

I don't how I got off track, but you are right about Lanzhou being HQ for Lanzhou Military Region but we started talking about Baoji being HQ for the 21st Group Army which it is, so I surpose nuking Lanzhou would make sense in the limited attack against China on Sept 26.

I still think the other sites,the munition facilities and Ft Rucker, in the US should still be reviewed as good targets after all reducing a nations ability to build weapons and train pilots, IMO, would be high on the target list as part of a first strike. Sorry to bother you again, but your comment that I didn't research or think it out logically kind of bugged me, But then again I did totally goof on Linz being a target.Iwaschris (talk) 19:51, March 18, 2013 (UTC)

Troll
This user, GWB III has caused several problems for me and my friends on other wikis, to the point where he was banned infinitely on both wikis. Now he has followed me here and said "Wassup asshole?" I was wondering if he could be banned.

20:13, March 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry to intrude on this issue, but I have to agree with Scrawland here. He has pretty much been banned on all the wikis he has been working on, and only decided to come here to taunt Scrawland and to add political gibberish on his userpage. If you have no objections, I will be blocking him for a month, and you feel free to extend or detract from that if need be. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:06, March 18, 2013 (UTC)

Partition of Germany
Is any possibility for Germany for being partitioned in the world without Stalin? FirstStooge (talk) 11:54, March 20, 2013 (UTC)

What do you mean for Germany would "not be divided on the same terms" FirstStooge (talk) 13:09, March 20, 2013 (UTC)

Very good idea :)

Last question, if I can make Poland strong enough to stay between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in late 1920s or maybe in early 1930s, is any possibility to make Poland joined the Allies that includes its old nemesis, the Soviet, and save the pre-war Polish government? FirstStooge (talk) 13:37, March 20, 2013 (UTC)

Could with Kirov on the board the Soviet become less agressive especially toward Poland and Finland? FirstStooge (talk) 13:31, March 21, 2013 (UTC)

Okay, if I secure the Ukrainian independence from the Soviet and created a military alliance between Pilsudki's Poland and Petliura's Ukraine, there are any chances for the Soviet to have a second thought for being too hostile toward Poland? FirstStooge (talk) 13:12, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

You are right, LG, no matter which person would being the Soviet leader (even Kirov), nothing can stop Soviet ambition toward Poland to establish a Polish soviet government.

Thanks anyway for your good advices :) FirstStooge (talk) 11:49, March 23, 2013 (UTC)

Franco-British Union
Hi Lordganon

I was just wondering how is my TL, The Franco-British Union a ASB because if you don't believe me the offer from Mollet was real.

Thanks - User:Lewody1 23/03/13 09:53 UTC

1983: Doomsday Guidelines/unique?
Been a while since we've last exchanged thoughts. You probably don't remember me at all, that's fine. I used to edit some projects on this site a year ago, worked on a few articles - and at least three dealt with the 1983: Doomsday timeline. I'm trying to tread carefully here (administrators, obviously, watch this one with particular interest) but I've read over the guidelines for both the site and the TL at hand on several occasions now...still an unanswered question.

I'm somewhat embarrassed to admit this, but I remain completely in the dark with regards to editing somebody else's article, even if it's merely to link a topic or correct spelling. Is everybody expected to stick completely to their own work and hands off everything else, even if it's for constructive, non-creative, means? What can be done to modify an article once it's passed into canon? Do we have to submit a new section up for review every time a major event happens, such as war or annexation?

--Emperor of Trebizond (talk) 22:00, March 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for clarifying. Apparently, I missed that discussion. On another topic, would you happen to know what the canon status is on Doomsday's Zimbabwe at the moment? I noticed Caer's proposals and thought perhaps I could take a stab at something a little more credible. --Emperor of Trebizond (talk) 18:11, March 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Presently looking into some possibilities regarding the evolution of our mystery brigadier's name. In the meantime, could the 8th Army Corps be substituted for the 9th Corps? Understandably, the entire formation was headquartered in Elazig, but I noticed that most of the units were actually based in settlements near Armenia. With the outbreak of a Turkish-Soviet frontier war immediately following Doomsday, it seems only logical that the 8th Corps (which was strategically placed to fight in the Caucasus prior) would waste no time in shifting every ounce of their existing manpower - a certain ubiquitous brigade commander included - to counter such a serious threat from that front. The 48th Motorized Brigade idea seems attractive, but the current plotline that Trabzon's self-proclaimed emperor once held a command on the border has always been an integral trend in the state's initial backstory - and I do wish to salvage it within reason. --Emperor of Trebizond (talk) 23:16, March 25, 2013 (UTC)


 * Did some digging and found a perfect solution. Until 1996, the Turkish Army's 11th Corps was actually based in Trabzon to counter any possible invasions via the USSR's Transcaucasian Military District. Thanks anyway for your insightful suggestions thus far. --Emperor of Trebizond (talk) 18:43, March 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * Are you referring to open diplomatic recognition on Georgia/Armenia's part? And what interest could Greece possibly have in Trabzon? Addressing your other remarks, I'll need some specifics to work with.


 * My thinking here is that a lot of small arms went 'poof' with Doomsday - light weapons which are easily stolen, missed, or sold on the black market have a nasty habit of vanishing in like manner once order breaks down; many undoubtedly found their way into the pool of small arms which flooded the Eastern Turkish Wasteland during the era of multiple warlords. Therefore, even a force which inherited a sizable portion of the 11th Corps' inventory would come out deficient...keeping in mind that not the entire corps itself was hardly inherited intact (inevitable losses, straggling, desertion, defection to the provisional authorities at Konya, etc).


 * As for the heavier weapons which couldn't possibly disappear so easily, it might have conceivably been an easier job keeping them around. A few ex-11th Corps M47 Patton tanks and some armored personnel carriers could be maintained for the new Trabzon "Defense Force", and there was no shortage of recon-type scout cars in the pre-Doomsday Gendarmes. As stated in the article, attempts were also made to conscript modified civilian vehicles and commercial aircraft for military purposes. A limited amount of artillery could be stripped from coastal defenses, existing military installations, and attached support batteries on the Soviet front deployed during the border war. --Emperor of Trebizond (talk) 19:06, March 31, 2013 (UTC)


 * You're right; Trabzon's mechanized component has been largely reduced to light scout cars; hence, the emphasis on 'armoured cars' rather than 'tanks' during the invasion of Greater Patnos. In fact, tanks are only mentioned once in the text. It's possible that under present conditions the TDF would only be able to get five a hundred meters without breakdown. However, the country doesn't have the capital to buy a lot of heavy equipment. Therefore as time goes on they would place a greater emphasis on maintaining what they have - you'd be surprised what places necessity sometimes takes an army. There are plenty of bankrupt OTL countries that still depend heavily on castoffs from the '50s, '60s, even WWII, because they can't afford any better. As generous as Armenia, Georgia, and Greece may be, they wouldn't be handing Trabzon the cream of their crop without accepting some form of payment. And I doubt that the reigning emperor is an individual who especially likes going heavily into debt, given Trabzon's developing economic state.


 * More food for thought: the Pontic regions were some of the most undeveloped places in Turkey in 1983. No existing industrial capacity whatsoever. No self-sufficiency for manufactured goods. At least countries like Greece have inherited pre-Doomsday factories, equipment, resources. Trabzon would have to cut everything from the whole cloth. And it seems at the moment they're focusing on agriculture and at the most, uniforms. Arms and ammunition are still far-off goals - better to focus on expanding what you have, instead of being a 'jack of all trades' and master of none. --Emperor of Trebizond (talk) 17:21, April 2, 2013 (UTC)


 * Very well. I've conceded to some renewed initiatives for the domestic production of some light military equipment, and added a tidbit which confirms Greece has been an open supplier of heavy weapons since 2006. My recent overhaul of the article was actually intended to increase its overall quality, rather than detract from such - I do hope in this I have at least partially succeeded. --Emperor of Trebizond (talk) 20:28, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Question
Hey LG. I was hoping you could answer a few questions I have about my timeline:
 * So, without the American Revolution occuring, how would that affect Europe, as far the possibility of the French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon.
 * Second, with British North America (the UPA) dominating most of North America, would the Russians sell Alaska to Britain, keep it, or ?
 * Third, would conflict between the UPA and Mexico (or New Spain) be inevitable?
 * Fourth question, how would a British dominated North America and no American Revolution affect the Spanish Empire.
 * Fifth and final question(s):
 * What would be the government of the United Provinces? Constitutional Monarchy or an democracy?
 * If a Constitution is drafted, would the Second Amendment be around in ATL?
 * Would the Imperial Federation be plauisible in this TL?
 * Would Hanover remain in a personal union with the United Kingdom? Enclavehunter (talk) 03:00, March 24, 2013 (UTC)

Why did you delete my list of presidents (president Dewey) thing?

Naming Conventions
I noticed that several of the "Night of the Living Alternate History" pages have been renamed by you from "Name (NotLAH)" to "Name (Night of the Living Alternate History)". Should I try to name pages this way in the future?

Mscoree (talk) 19:53, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism
Early I left a message on the talk page of the TSPTF regarding recent vandalism of one of my pages. I'm not sure if I wrote in the right place so I'm bringing it to your attention here:

"Some user named 'Branbran64' has continuous vandalized the Night of the Living Alternate History (Map Game)page. His most recent attack has been posting 'Eddie ands jon r butthurt so much they cant walk 'cause they have full anuses' several hundred times. He has wrote several messages, including one that sexually harrassed another user, and he appears to not be done. If some one could ban him that would be great. Mscoree (talk) 01:02, March 30, 2013 (UTC)"

If there is anything you can do that would be much appreciate. Mscoree (talk) 01:42, March 30, 2013 (UTC)

Ok, but what specifically was I doing that was spamming so I know not to do it in the future

I'm licensed to chill 20:04, April 25, 2013 (UTC)

You know its that time of year...
1 day away from April. The UIP better get testing some of its refitted MiG-21s ;)  Imp (Say Hi?!) 20:22, March 31, 2013 (UTC)

So what's gonna happen now. :L  Imp (Say Hi?!) 21:50, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, I see. So should we get started on the article? And would it all begin off by a MiG-21 being shot down over enemy territory, UIP sends troops for rescue-op, who get detected. Firefight ensures, UIP sends in reinforcements and boom! War begins? Imp (Say Hi?!) 11:49, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, got sidetracked watching How I met your Mother.

Hmm, I understand. Yet why were the UIP troops in the area anyway? So they launch the rescue attempt, get driven back, gain troop nos and launch a full fledged assult on the breakaways? :L  Imp (Say Hi?!) 12:17, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

Lol, it was ages ago and I kinda forgot. XD

Thanks for the reminder. I'll try and get to work on that article. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 10:42, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

Zimmermann
question what are the chances of the USA not getting involved in ww1 if germany didnt send the zimmermann telegraph and was willing to negotiate with the states on the topic of ending unrestricted submarine warfare. Nkbeeching (talk) 19:25, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

aright but is there any way to keep the USA out of ww1 maybe being out voted in the congress about getting into the war, sine their is no zimmermann telegram. Nkbeeching (talk) 13:16, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

ok then would it have atleast led to a longer debate on weither to join the war or not like ive put in my timeline which by would be effected by german gains hence convincing many to not want to het involved, if not ill redo the TL and start at another point. iwant to be plausible when i come up with a PoD tht keeps the americans out of the war.Nkbeeching (talk) 11:39, April 5, 2013 (UTC)

alright and if they decided to not restart unrestricted warfare and instead decided to focus submarine strikes on the britishnavy wold their be any way for them to force the allies to negotiations before U.S. forces could due anything major? Nkbeeching (talk) 13:25, April 5, 2013 (UTC)

question if the french mutinies become to bad as the germans push west could the central powers force a peace treaty on the allies before american aid becomes a dominant factor in the war effort, ill have them enter the war in the TL in early 1918 Nkbeeching (talk) 14:42, April 5, 2013 (UTC)

ok so only forcing the frenchout of the war with the units liberated from the eastern front before theamericans could get involvved is the only solutiob iguess. thanks for the heLP LG  Nkbeeching (talk) 11:25, April 6, 2013 (UTC)

sobasicly i have to scrap the TL nd look for another PoD that would keep the states out of the war. thts what i want  to do keep them out of the war and take the TL from there.Nkbeeching (talk) 12:26, April 6, 2013 (UTC)

ive set up another tl where the lusitania never sinks hopefully that will keep the usa out of the war for enough time as it would a large amounr of the population ambilavent towards germany and atleast half the population anti war by 1918Nkbeeching (talk) 10:41, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

alright ill read up s bit more and do ssome adjutments here and there and slowly work my way through the war to make itt plausible. thnks for the help btw Nkbeeching (talk) 12:57, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Computer problems
Hey, Lordganon, this might sound dumb, but I am having problems loading the links for a list of nations on Korean Invasion, 2012. Would you be able to add that? My computer sometimes gives me fits. :)Daeseunglim (talk) 12:16, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Isiro
Due to some major problems with my time, my computer, and my internet, I haven't been active at all since the end of Feb. and that's probably going to continue till at least mid-April, so could you take over the Isiran Revolution bit, have the Mbias o'erthrown, etc? I should be back soon but I really don;t want to let it linger.

<span style="-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(#000000 50%,#000000 50%));"><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding-bottom:1px;padding-top:1px;-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#000000 45%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#CCCCFF 45%,#FF0000 50%));border-top-left-radius:500px 400px;border-bottom-left-radius:500px 400px">           <span style="background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, right top, left top, from(#ffffff), to(#0000ff)); -webkit-border-radius: 36px 12px; -moz-border-radius: 36px / 12px; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 5px #ff0000; border:2px double #E5E4E2 border-radius:5px; border-bottom-right-radius:100px 90px; border-top-right-radius:100px 90px; color:#FFFFFF"> <font color="#FFffff" face="Arial">"Very funny, Scotty.   <font color="#000000" face="Arial" title="Bvlog">Now beam down my clothes."  21:40, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Re:TSPTF
Wow! That would be sweet. However, I do not know the amount of power I would yield or what exactly I would do (I could just end up as some dork who users end up giving tons of hate). Although if it meant saving the wiki and getting new users interested in TLs rather than map games, then I'm in. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 12:20, April 5, 2013 (UTC)

Sure, I'd be honoured! I accept. :] -Kogasa  2013年4月05日 22:08:50 (JST)

Hi Lordqanon! Is it free to create an username?94.255.222.206 13:09, April 5, 2013 (UTC)

Not bad. I think I might be able to stop a few more fights now :) And delete defunct map games. Although, if I got it wrong - could I bring back a page? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 13:16, April 5, 2013 (UTC)

No problem LG. Its all good. :'D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 13:24, April 5, 2013 (UTC)

I'm gonna have to accept that nomination, aren't I, btw. ;)  Imp (Say Hi?!) 13:25, April 5, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Right on it. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 10:45, April 6, 2013 (UTC)

Facelift
Seeing as the UIP is in a better state to invest in its railways (which would by far be the most common method for transportation) and seeing that the cities would be no where near as urbanised as OTL, could we have the UIP commissioning the laying of electric lines (I'm not sure if they were in place in 1983) and the designing of new train engines? India today still uses old ones, unfortunately and this would be something interesting.

They would be used to link up all the major cities in UIP control as well as make it easier to transport coal from Orissa to the rest of the nation. It might also serve to begin the process of urbanisation of the UIP after all these years. We coul have like a competition for the prize, so like we might find homegrown designs as well as a few ANZC companes pitching in to show off their designs. The requirements would be pretty tight as we will have to assume the UIP will not be able to spare that much cash. However, it would still be quite a lucrative project post-DD. Your thoughts?

Timescale-wise, we would have to backtrack to March, and I would expect the construction of the chosen design to begin in the fall of this year (early estimate) to the opening of next year (later estimate).

On another note, would this pic of the Lotus Temple in Dehli be suitable for the New Parliament Building in Bombay. I find it classy. The Lotus Temple itself took 6 years to be completed, finishing in 1986. As DD happened in '83,  I'd trust this building would probably be destroyed in the chaos. Maybe it could be the inspiration for the new Parliament building?

On another note, I plan to create articles on a few companies in India, if that is alright (will have the proposal template on it). This will include HAL and Tata Motors. Fine with you? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 13:13, April 6, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, ok. But eventually the UIP is gonna realise they need better trains. Do you have any idea when this might happen? It might be a good chance for the UIP to encourage competition to help blossom the numbers of intelletuals designing trains and stuff.

But I really would like a different purpose for this building. A temple doesn't quite suit such a design. The windows make it look like some sort of parliament building (they do, don't they?).

Ok then. Thanks. I might begin work on it after Operation Dissolution (like the name, lol). :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 12:03, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Wabash-Superior contact
Yeah, LG, just the title says, what's a plausible date for contact between Wabash and Superior? Godfrey Raphael (talk) 13:49, April 6, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, LG! Godfrey Raphael (talk) 12:51, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Korean Invasion: 2012
LG, thanks for adding that category!

Would it be plausable for NATO to unintentionally drag Russia into the war by unintentionally bombing several convoys of Russian owned warships that were headed to protect Vladivstok. NATO was led to believe by jarbled transmissions that they were headed to hit US aircraft carrier formations. Also, the war is going to turn nuclear through miscommunication between North Korean missile operatives and Kim Jong Un. Thanks for your help Daeseunglim (talk) 22:21, April 10, 2013 (UTC)

LG, the page I was working on got deleted. Any idea what happened? Thanks Daeseunglim (talk) 15:14, April 11, 2013 (UTC)

Okay, could you tell me the name, or put it on the nuclear homepage, because I am having problems finding it. If I type it in all that comes up is either DD: 1983, or something on Korea in another timeline. Daeseunglim (talk) 14:30, April 13, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for that. I remember. Did u see that to expain why Cheyenne survived? I was planning on also saying that NORAD was hit by a bunker buster cluster bomb and the city was hit by conventional weapons from Russia. Russia and China both got involved unintentionally. Daeseunglim (talk) 20:05, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

Whoops, sorry about that LG...I looked that up. I forgot that Cheyenne Mt is located outside of Colorado Springs...Thanks for pointing that out. I also found that NORAD moved command to Peterson AFB in 2006, with Cheyenne Mt. as backup if things ever went too hot. I would assume that NORAD would move back to Cheyenne quickly because NORAD's website says that Cheyenne Mt. is kept garrisoned for emergency purposes.Daeseunglim (talk) 12:20, April 17, 2013 (UTC)

Iwaschris
Sorry to bother you, but I wanted to get your opinion on Iwaschris. I have been noticing that he has been doing a large amount of article creating and image uploading. But much of the articles he is creating are about people, but the information on them is no more informative to the timeline than on Wikipedia. In fact, one of the articles is on Eduard Khil, which nothing distinct for that timeline anywhere on that page. Wouldn't this be a case of recreating Wikipedia? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:58, April 11, 2013 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see. I thought that rule also applied to articles which convey a similar history to OTL. While I missed the part where it refers to the USSR still existing, the whole paragraph seems to be a direct copy from Wikipedia. But if you have no problem with this, than I don't. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:08, April 13, 2013 (UTC)

Napoleon's World
I apologize if I did so so. However it was not my intention to do so, nor did I notice the leader names being removed from the infoboxes when I made the edits. Razgriz 2K9 (talk) 11:42, April 17, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Infoboxes/Publishing
Your watchful eye over the wiki is appreciated, as always.

Thank you! Well, I'm self publishing. Epic science fiction isn't the easiest genre to land an agent for, so I'm doing the Kindle Direct route with this book while I work on my Cold War thriller. Not sure I've ever seen the wiki announcements page but that sounds great, one more marketing tool.

KingSweden (talk) 00:59, April 18, 2013 (UTC)

Spelling
Yep, just as I thought. ^.^  Doctor261  (Talk to me!) 14:31, April 18, 2013 (UTC)

Archiving
I received your message about archiving the talk page for Night of the Living Alternate History. I think I did it correctly, but you can double check if you wish. How often should I archive in the future? Mscoree (talk) 14:17, April 19, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Dutch in "13"
Glad to hear that it pretty much works out. With Europe done, I have been pondering how the other imperial powers would handle their colonies (in light of a successful United Commonwealth). The Dutch seemed easy to figure out in a day, so I started with them. I would also suspect the French, Portuguese, and Spanish to follow a similar path (Spain keeps Puerto Rico, after all). I also remember you mentioning that the Prussians would [still] get Cameroon (IIRC), but I will leave other (if any) Prussian African colonies up for debate when I begin the discussion on Africa (I probably will save that for later, and start South America pretty soon).

I had a feeling Indonesia would be divided up. Aside from "divide and conquer," it makes sense. Still not too sure how it would be divided up. From what I can make of it at the moment, I have five states, all based on the main island groups. I will probably do more reading on it soon.

Can't say I am surprised that the Dutch don't keep Ghana, but nothing to worry about. This would definitely solve the problem I was having with "why would the Dutch keep most of their colonies, but still sell the Antilles?" LOL

"Quibble"? I just learned a new word. Sorry to hear that the Antarctica idea won't work, but you are right that this part of the continent is worthless in comparison to the rest. Just thought that the distance from South Africa, and the fact that SA did show interest in making a claim. But nothing to worry about.

Norway is part of Denmark. If the Norwegians still want to go exploring in the region, than I don't see any reason why Denmark wouldn't make a claim. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:51, April 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * You haven't been on in a couple of days, I truly hope you are okay (I got over the flu a few weeks ago, so just want to be sure).


 * I intend to start a thread for South America in a few days or so, and my map is (more or less) done. However, I have been thinking about what you said, and I was wondering if I could get some clarification.


 * You mentioned that pretty much all of Spain's colonial possessions in the Americas gain independence by the 1880s/90s. My question would be simple: why? While it seems obvious that the Revolutions of the 1820s would have happened, the difference is that no war in Europe allows Spain to crush them (with the exception of Louisiana and the Floridas). If this be the case, wouldn't Spain take more steps to prevent dissidence in the future? With Spain getting luck to keep them, combined with the success of the British to form an Imperial Federation; wouldn't there be some support to remain Spanish?


 * Or am I looking at it wrong. That with more centuries of development (in comparison with the British), that a sense of "American" existed among the Viceroyalties? That Spain would remain slow (if at all) to initiate change, that it would be too late to act by the 1880s?


 * I am merely curious as to you coming out with this outcome. I have no intentions of changing them so they don't become independent (I support the New Netherlander Empire). However (aside from Puerto Rico [which I am more in favor of having them remain Spanish]), wouldn't their be other territories which remained (aside from Africa). I am aware that Peru was pretty loyalist during the 1820s. Do you believe this would change decades down the line? I truly hope you don't mind me asking. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:53, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Quite surprised to see you on so early. Safe to assume everything is alright on your end? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 03:11, April 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * You were definitely longer than usual. But as long as you don't have the flu or anything like that, than no need to worry. I can understand, after looking at the recent uploads long enough it can get confusing.


 * Glad to see that the French and Portuguese would do so. Though how they do it I am a little fuzzy on. Since France OTL is solid (in regards to the United Commonwealth), do you think they would do the same here. As to what areas remain, I will get along to that eventually. Also (because I have been thinking this lately), do you think some parts of Algeria may remain part of France? I believe some of the Pied-Noirs wanted some sort of arrangement like this.


 * Definitely right about their treatment of their colonies, though I would have assumed some changes would have occurred after almost loosing them. Never really crossed my mind that Spain truly saw the creoles as just natives. That would definitely change the stakes.


 * I will worry about Africa more when I get to it. Though depending on how Portugal is structured will I decide whether they keep their colonies or allow them independence. I wanted to leave this open when I do South America soon, but I have another Brazil question. I am aware that one of the reasons Brazil stayed together was because the royals moved there and even lead them to independence. Without Napoleon, the royals would remain in Europe. Simply put, would there be any reason for Brazil to remain in tact? I do know some of the northern regions attempted to separate OTL. Do you think Brazil would be smaller states?


 * A little disappointed that Indonesia is going to be more difficult than I realized. LOL. So eight "dominions", two "sultanates", and two independent nations. Sounds okay. Should I consider the sultanates to be similar to Hyperabad and such in India? My only question would be why Jakarta would be a dominion? Other than that, I believe I have understanding on.


 * If you don't mind me asking, what sources do you use to get your ancestral data? I generally look at Geni (when available). But thank you for your help on much of them. The only thing I have to add is that you have answered my prayers with Ross Perot. I have been debating whether I would find any worthy Louisianans for here, and Perot seems to be one. So thank you so much for that. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:08, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

Glad to hear it.

France sounds alright with me. I believe it is safe to say that the regions France has OTL would be included, but other than that I am not completely sure. Glad to hear that parts of Algeria could be included. I will have to look into this more.

So Brazil would remain united, eh? Very different from what I thought would've been the case. Just as a second question, would Brazil gain independence around the same time as the Hispanic republics (around the 1880s), or would it be different?

I thought we had an understanding that Indonesia would be divided up into separate dominions (similar to India). But I guess I could have misunderstood you, and that you were only referring to the separation of Aceh and Papua. I was thinking it would be divided up, much like how the Brits divided into into several dominions. However, I guess it could be argued that the main reasons Hyperabad (etc.) was separated from India was because they were not colonies (more so "protectorates" and the like). If you think Indonesia can last as a single dominion, then I don't have anything against it, aside from it now having me re-shuffle my brain. Though I have a trivial question if this be the case, what would it be called? Would "East Indies" remain, or would "Indonesia" be adopted?

That is pretty much what I do, glad to see that I am on the right track.

Well I was getting worried that I would have had to make up people for Louisiana, which I don't want to do (especially with the luck I have had with OTL politicians in ATL). But with this, I feel confident that I may be able to come up with a list some point in the future. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 04:45, April 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * Are you telling me Brazil would still become a monarchy?


 * I have updated my map of Indonesia, and I do agree that it being divided would better suit the region (especially because it is an archipelago). Since it is divided, my question regarding its name is not moot; though I agree "East Indies" would remain as a collective term.


 * Well thank you, but you don't have to go to too much trouble. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 05:30, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

Wait... Brazil would still establish a monarchy? How can that be? If my understanding is correct, the fact that the royals relocated to Brazil for a a few decades helped stir support among the royals (especially Prince Pedro) and the Brazilian people to gain independence via a monarchy. No Napoleon, no relocation and no establishing Brazil as an equal kingdom. How would a monarchy be established here?

As long as I am not impeding you. I do thank you for your suggestions. However, I have my doubts that Jindal took much research to figure out. LOL. Also thank you for your other suggestions. However, I would like to relook at a few candidates (especially since I have had them canon in other areas).

Colin Powell I have as the VP for George W. Bush in New Netherland. Given that his parents emigrated from Jamaica, I would still believe that there is as much a chance he would be New Netherlander as he would be Jamaican (kinda like Jindal). If you have no objections, I think I would prefer to leave him as a VP.

Joe Biden's family appears to be split, with his father's side being Marylander and his mother's Pennsylvanian. Given the closeness of Maryland and Pennsylvania (and the fact that Biden hails from Delaware in many regards), I believe he would have as much chances being Pennsylvanian here as Marylander. I think I will stick with PA.

Those are the only two I have any issue with (given that they have been canonized as part of other nations), but I look forward to your response. The only other person I may have an issue with is Joe Lieberman, primarily because I got your message only hours after I placed him as a potential president for New England (did you decide to look him up because I posted that?). Given that one side is Austrian/Polish, and the other side is New Englander (Connecticut), he may also be a variable (though I agree that New Netherland may still be the preferred port for immigration ATL). But since he has not been canonized anywhere, I don't have as much of an issue with him as the previous two.

My only comments to the others has to be that now I can now imagine Sarah Palin hunting moose in Maine. I also swore that Dick Chaney would have been New Englander, though I could be mistaken with my original research of Thomas E. Dewey. Now I have a hankering to potentially make Chaney a president of Virginia. I also swore Ron Paul would've been Pennsylvanian, but nothing to worry about. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 17:59, April 30, 2013 (UTC)


 * I am still confused as to Brazil still becoming a monarchy, though I can slightly understand. If a peaceful-ish separation takes place, how close would the two kingdoms be? I am also curious (but I believe I already know your answer to be "no"), with the success of imperial federations ATL, what would be the chances of some type of forming later on (like the late 1800s or at all). Also (because I is a republican ;P), how common was it for a monarchy to split between two countries (primarily in Europe I mean).

Never quite though about that (Jindal-wise). I still find it odd (OTL) that immigrants from India would decide to move to "open and tolerant" south. Also glad to hear that Powell can work out.

Biden's family is quite confusing. As tempting as it may be to have another candidate for Maryland, I may want to let it sink in for a bit (though I still prefer PA).

You seriously didn't notice it? Talk about coincidences. Either way, nothing against Lieberman being from NY, just more shocked that I just put him in NE and then you came around. LOL. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:21, May 2, 2013 (UTC)


 * Well I guess friendly relations between the two is better than war and chaos. Am I also to assume that Brazil remains a monarchy to this day, or would they fall into a republic (much like OTL). I also have to wonder how the Carolinian-Brazilian relations would be throughout this time period (especially since they would be the last two nations to abolish slavery).


 * One of Billy Joel's songs is called "It's Still Rock and Roll to Me", and this is all I can think about when you mentioned a moderate Louisiana. No matter how moderate Louisiana may be, it's still the South to me. XP Jokes aside, here that obviously wouldn't be an issue ATL.


 * I will do some more reading on him and come up with an idea some point down the line. Given that he is Catholic, Maryland may be interesting. If you remember our conversation about John Edwards, Biden was actually my "temporary president" for PA (before I finalized Hillary). I was also considering that he would have been President of PA in the 1990s (given that he did run in '88 IIRC).


 * Still shocked you didn't even notice that. Oh well, doesn't matter now. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:08, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

Sounds okay to me. Now I find it more odd to have a monarchy in the Americas (or rather an independent monarchy). It also just crossed my mind, but not too sure. Given that Rio de la Plata does fight for independence (but still looses) and Brazil remains loyalist (in many ways), do you think Brazil may be able to gain (i.e., Uruguay).

Yep, I have been considering that Maryland would be more Catholic ATL. In fact, it was this fact that pushed the Dutch residents of Delaware (at the time) to favor the Quakers of Pennsylvania over becoming part of Catholic Maryland. So it was Catholicism that gave us Delaware. Now that it has sunk it, I may very well indeed have Biden be Marylander. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 14:58, May 3, 2013 (UTC)


 * Wait a second, you think Uruguay would still gain independent here? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:59, May 4, 2013 (UTC)

Wow! Nothing against it, I just didn't really consider it gaining independence here (due to Argentina possibly keeping much of its original territory).

I have uploaded a map of South America and started a conversation. I am sure there will be some problems. I look forward to your two cents. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 01:16, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

I need some of your advices 2
Yesterday, I asked Nuke about some questions regarding Nazi Germany and the World War II. He gave some good basic points but he said me to ask you for more specific answers. Here it is some of my few and short questions: FirstStooge (talk) 04:23, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) What is the impact of the non-existence/premature death of Hitler and the Nazi leadership of Gregor Strasser?
 * 2) With Strasser as the fuhrer, there is any possibility for Nazi Germany to reduce its hostility toward the USSR?
 * 3) With Strasser as the fuhrer, Germany became less invasive and less brutal (unless toward the Jews)?
 * 4) Could I made the establishment of Israel as the political agreement between Germany and the United Kingdom?
 * 5) Any ways to prevent the United States and/or the Soviet Union for getting directly involved in World War II?
 * 6) If Germany making peace with the Soviet Union earlier, how does the war end? Is through a sort of "Paris Peace Conference" or something?

Re: Graduating Articles
How I always forget this, I'll never know. Sorry about that. Vladivostok (talk) 12:47, April 25, 2013 (UTC)

You labbled my page ASB. What is ASB. If it is bad what can i do to improve it? Octivian Marius (talk) 00:30, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

Zheng China
Hellor Lordganon, or LG, this is Hlanus. I am trying to fix the Zheng China timeline, but I have a partner who keeps getting ahead of me. He's the creator of the Dual Expedition (Zheng China) page, and he's the one who set up the war between China and South India. I had no idea what that was about until you pointed it out, so thanks for brining it to my attention. I read the page on deleting content, but I am not sure if I can. I tried telling him to stop and slow down, but he keeps ignoring me. As an administrator, what should I do? Hlanus (talk) 14:21, April 26, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Here's the problem as I see it. Zhu Gaoxi is at this point pretty hell bent on ceasing the voyages, and the Confucians are well-behind him. The Treasure Fleet voyages cost a lot of money and the coincidence of several natural disasters, like floods and famine, convince the Chinese that Heaven wants the fleets to cease. With all this in mind, I can't see a reason why Zhu Gaoxi would suddenly change his mind and allow them to persist. The only thing I could come up with that was even slightly plausible was if he died in a freak accident right after his order, which would appear to be Heaven's judgement on him. The only other thing would have been if his half-brother launched a coup, but that would have led to civil war and China would have been weakened, not strengthened.

The only other thing I have is if the Yongle Emperor invested in the fleet only and not his other projects, which were part of his plan to bloster his legitimacy, seeing as he took the throne from his nephew with the help of the eunuchs, for which he awarded them tremendous, even unprecedented, influence, which the Confucians resented. With all this in mind, how else could the Chinese have preserved the fleets and maintained their role in trade?

While other dynasties, such as the Song Dynasty, were more into trade and more open to it, I can not find any references to the Zheng surname until the Ming, unless I create one, but that idea has already been used. So am I wasting my time with this? 68.231.174.243 03:17, April 27, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Sorry about that. Still a little inexperienced. Well, the thing is is that during the Song Dynasty, the Chinese, even the Confucians, were more open to trade because they were running out of land to farm, especially with the conquest of the north by the Jin Dynasty. The Ming rebelled against the Mongols by trying to restore classic Confucian ideals, which were reinterpreted during the Song to argue for the expansion rather than inhibition of trade because it was easier than taxing the people, who often were overtaxed by the rich. I was wondering if over time the Confucians, especially with newer generations, would agree to that line of reasoning again if the fleets could more expediently help the Chinese people than the traditional methods. 68.231.174.243 04:27, April 27, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Perhaps with time and experience, they will come to change. I have a question. You mentioned that the Chinese could have reached Europe albeit at a smaller scale. Would that have meant going around the Cape, or through Egypt? I am thinking of the Emperor sending a scouting party of no more than ten ships around the African coast to scout ahead. If all else fails, then he should establish a trading presence in Egypt, which is the closest China can get to Europe without rounding the Cape, if I am correct.

Just a word, regarding the "Easternized World" timeline, we see the Chinese suddenly exploding out of China to conquer a huge empire. I know my timeline is different, taking place after China has suffered a few blows, but would not the problems of unity and Confucian ideals have stopped the Chinese in that timeline as well? I just want to know to what degree that timeline and mine are comparable. 68.231.174.243 05:11, April 27, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Could the Chinese have established a presence at the Cape? I suppose no, but I want to be sure. At this point, they are simply exploring the possibilities. If they can, then maybe they will establish a kind of presence in India, though I do not see how it could be in the NW, as the only way to get there is up the Indus, or through the Mongol tribes, Khanates, and the Tibetan Plateau. Maybe south India would be better? Zheng He did act as a diplomat there and he had something of a reputation as an excellent diplomat.

As for that expansion for expansion's sake, could that work here too? Or am I making connections where none exist? Perhaps frame the trade voyages and potential colonies as means to expansion over land, by filling the coffers for training and breeding cavalry. 68.231.174.243 06:07, April 27, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Sorry slip of the finger. Here's the post:

I see, thanks for the clarification. I know I need to make this plausible, but there is one little thing I want to do: in otl, Zhu Gaoxi, the Yongle Emperor's second son, was noted to be a brilliant tactical thinker and military man, and I want to give him a chance to shine in my timeline. I figure the Chinese shore up their treasury, reform their army (perhaps incorporating the policies of Yue Fei or someone like him), and launch a campaign to end the Mongol threat, probably not now but much later. I figure that if they cut spending to the minimum and conduct trade overseas with multiple partners, they should have enough within 30 years or so. Would that be a reasonable amount of time? 68.231.174.243 08:50, April 27, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

A little update. I have Zheng He in charge of four ships and they have reached the Cape, but he is considering turning back due to the currents. I want to send him forward, but that is probably too risky. You think he would choose prudence over adventure as I do, or am I undermining him? 68.231.174.243 09:00, April 27, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I think after this I'll get some sleep.

I kinda figure that if the Chinese can incorporate the Mongols somehow, as they did in "Easternized World", then they would have a tremendous advantage as they would have the Mongols working WITH them instead of AGAINST them. Also, when I look at the map, the only real solution to the Ming's northern frontier is conquest. I doubt they can withdraw any further without risking a resurrection of the Golden Horde (Genghis Khan's army), and the maintenance of the border was a constant financial drain. How did the Manchus win over the Mongols, besides waiting for them and the Ming to wear each other down that is? Perhaps the Chinese could implement their methods as well? 68.231.174.243 09:04, April 27, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I'll see if I can incorporate the Manchu's methods with my timeline, though they are already playing the tribes against each other, backing the Oirats against the others. Perhaps when Esen Taishi takes over, that will be China's opportunity to make the other tribes allies, perhaps even their vassels, but that is for later.

I have in some ways fixed the first page, "China's Accension", but it is not an accurate title for the page. Can I rename it? I am sure I can, but I am unsure how. 68.231.174.243 20:29, April 27, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Ignore the last request about renaming please, I figured it out. Anyway, I am figuring that if the Mongols proceed as they do otl, they will unite under Esen Taishi, or at least the Western tribes will. If they are in conflict with the eastern ones, that could provide China the opportunity to recruit them as allies and possibly defeat Esen in a decisive campaign, and perhaps force his empire to acknowledge China's supremacy. Is that a realistic plan? Hlanus (talk) 20:37, April 27, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Hello, Hlanus again. I think I may have a problem. My PoD is that the Hongwu Emperor's brother takes over after his death, but according to Ming Dynasty order of succession, it should be the son of the Emperor who takes over, not the brother. The problem is that not ALL of the Emperor's sons die, and some of them have sons as well, which means we could have a succession crisis, especially with the Confucian opposition. Should I just change it so that the brother becomes a regent instead and his nephew takes over? Hlanus (talk) 05:42, April 28, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Could not the more reactionary scholars argue that as his nephew survived the fire that killed most of his immediate family that he was somehow blessed by Heaven and hence had more right to rule? Anyway, I am guessing that they will have some support from the more reactionary members, they will attempt a takeover, the Emperor, using his father's secret police, will lay a trap, their forces will be "subdued", and the sons and their heirs will be killed. I am wondering if this is too draconian, as it MAY cost him the support of the Confucians, who prefer using virtue rather than force to govern. Hlanus (talk) 15:21, April 28, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Hello, its me again. I took care of that succession crisis. BTW, do you have any information on the descendants of Zheng He's older brother, Ma Wenming. From the little I could gather, Ma Wenming had a son, Enlai, who was adopted by Zheng He, giving him the name Zheng Enlai. He in turn had two sons, Wanxian and Tingxian. I just want to know if this information is indeed correct, because I know that Zheng He himself had no male heirs, being castrated at age 11. Really appreciate all your help. Have a good one.Hlanus (talk) 03:20, April 30, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I know Zheng He died in 1433 in otl, but remember that he was on the seventh voyage, which has to be stressful on a man of his years. I figured if he travelled a smaller distance he might have lived longer, though ten years IS pushing it. Plus eunuchs have longer lifespans than ordinary men as they do not invest at all in reproduction, some living up to ten years longer, though with all the stress he's been under, I doubt that would have had THAT much impact. I will correct it very soon. As for the city, I know Surat was NOT the capital, but I figured the Chinese would want to stick to the sea in case negotiations went sour, so to say. I started with Diu, but I wasn't sure, so I will use it. And I will correct the Mongol campaign soon, though I am somewhat stuck on the peace negotiations. In otl, Esen had to accept less favorable conditions as he failed to defeat the Chinese decisively. Here, he is defeated again, but the treaty is complicated, as his defeat and eventual death destablized the Oirat Khanate and they soon resumed infighting, so any attempt at a permanent peace treaty would be folly. I figured the best is for Esen to resume tributary status, with horses being part of the tribute, and perhaps a sister/daughter as a bride for the Emperor's son to bloster his power over the Western tribes, as that region is vital to the overland Silk Road. This is all speculation for the time being though so please stay in touch. Hlanus (talk) 03:59, May 1, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I am basing the naming of the chimpanzees and gorillas based on what the Chinese in otl called them. As for their inland journey, I am going on the premise that they travelled up the river. While their ships could not get up river, their boats and the locals probably could.

By "building a town" are you referring to the cape? I was thinking along the lines of a port for repairing and receiving ships with the town to support that. Also, I never said that they would build it on their next voyage, or even within the next century. Zheng Tingxian is just trying to keep his options open here, but he will have a dickens of a time trying to convince the court that the cape is worth building as a colony.

As for the Portuguese, I am not sure how reliable their information is, as it is based on rumors, and MAYBE Marco Polo's descriptions of his travels to the Yuan Dynasty. If anyone in Portugal actually travelled to China, then they would probably have a mre factually based vision of what China is like. By my research, otl, the Portuguese would reach the Indian Ocean in the late 1400s and they would reach Ming China in 1513 via Jorge Alvares. I don't know if the Portuguese or any European made it to Ming China overland before this, so my ASSUMPTION based on my knowledge is that they have grown up hearing the stories of Marco Polo and his fantastic descriptions of China during the Yuan Dynasty.

Thanks for the feedback. Will look over the timeline. Hlanus (talk) 14:51, May 4, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

As for Zheng Tingxian, I have him on the central west coast of Africa near the Benin Empire (under King Euware if I am not mistaken) and he has a choice of going all the way to Europe or turning back for China. You think he has the means to keep going? Hlanus (talk) 19:39, May 4, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I will make the corrections. Just a few things: I did some research on the Swahili and Yoruba languages and, if I am reading it right both belong to the Niger-Congo language family, which means that they have SOME similarities, akin to Irish and Hindi, both being Indo-European languages. Maybe the differences are too great for that.

As for the Portuguese, I figured that since they have never seen China before and are relying on second-hand accounts, like Marco Polo, I think they would have PERCEIVED a large gap, because Marco Polo describes China (under the Yuan Dynasty) as being very large and wealthy, though of course he was exaggerating in certain areas. If the only source you have are rumors and second-hand accounts like this, I wonder how they could have known about their advantage against the Chinese. Plus the turbulent times in Europe, including the Fall of Constantinople and the ongoing wars in the Balkans and elsewhere, indicating an expansion of Islam against Christianity, are (I think) going to make some a little jumpier than they would otherwise, and in times of stress the extremists become more agreeable.

As for the whole Africa thing, I will modify it to include a partial map of Africa based on Arab maps of the Mediterranean and their own charts of exploration. Would this fuel further voyages of exploration? Or would the Chinese be content with just this? Also as for the Oyo, I think I will have the Portuguese bypass them, if they are undergoing rough times. Or would the Portuguese take that chance?

As for the River, would the Chinese name it Great River as the local do, or would they transliterate their pronounciation? Thanks for the feedback. Hlanus (talk) 16:36, May 5, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

One other thing: I have the Portuguese navy hiring themselves out as privateers to the Italians, partly to bring in more revenue and give their navy more battle experience (and to keep the extremists out of Afonso's hair, so to say). IF this did happen, how would the Ottoman-Venice War have been different? Would the Ottomans pull out to protect their assets from this new threat, possibly (however remotely) seeking a peace with Italy to give them time to upgrade their navy? Probably if they suffered enough losses, but I am not sure.

Also, I found a reference to a Turkish Crusade in 1481, but I am having trouble finding out more. Was this just a fancy title slapped onto a minor skirmish or conflict, like much of the Crusades after the Third one? Or am I really off the mark? I am asking because from what I have read, the Ottoman wars in Europe are slowing down in the mid 1470s and they are shifting their attention to Mesopotamia and Persia to fight the Aq Qoyunlu.

Finally, around the 1480s, in otl Dayan Khan arises to reunite the Mongols. As Esen is still alive at this time, albeit at advanced age, would this have sparked a Mongol Civil War? Would the Chinese try to capitalize on this, try to support Esen as an ally, or just keep their eye on them for unexpected developments? I think they would fluctuate between the second and third, as these are cheaper than the first and they need to keep Esen's friendship to prevent the rise of a powerful Mongolia, and abandoning him would turn him against them, unless they were too busy elsewhere.

Really appreciate all this, and sorry for my inital reaction when you began pointing out the problems. Have a good one. Hlanus (talk) 17:31, May 5, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Just a few clarifications: "The other Muslim states would not do that". I am guessing that this refers to the decision to remain neutral in Portugal's conflict with the Ottomans. Would they ecnomically support the Ottomans, or just remain neutral albeit on the lookout for trouble, like Catherine the Great and the League of Armed Neutrality during the American Revolution?

Also, I clarified the distance issue. It is just that some are more xenophobic than others in Portugal and they're exaggerating to get support, as I have Diogo Gomes shut down in my timeline.

Speaking of distance, is the reason the Chinese are not entering Portugal's radar due to the distance between them.

Also, I came across something called the War of Castilian Succession, which occurred between 1475 and 1479 where a Portuguese offensive into "Spain" was described due to a political marriage between Afonso V of Portugal and Joana la Beltraneja of Castile. I am asking because I am wondering how this war would affect Portugal's navy. I know that the Spanish and Portuguese fleets would fight a war in the Atlantic, and I am guessing that the Portuguese would enjoy more decisive victories due to their recent naval upgrades, though whether the Spanish were able to keep up with these is an unknown factor in my calculations.

Finally "they would not bypass the Oho", you mean "Oyo" and are describing the Chinese I presume. Just want to be sure. As for their additional voyages, I am describing more the hopes of particular people than the policies of China. The court is content for the moment about their level of trade and are not terribly keen on potential overextension, due to the memory of the Yongle Emperor, and the stirrings in the north. It will probably be until after the 1500s that the Chinese decide to go exploring the wide oceans just for the heck of it.

Hlanus (talk) 15:28, May 6, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

So with Castile's navy torn up even more from the war, and Columbus's calculations being WAY off, would he received any support for his trans-Atlantic voyage? I suppose not much, because he went to a lot of places BEFORE Castile, and even they took some convincing (though I'm beginning to suspect they indulged him PARTIALLY to get him out of their hair). With Castile's navy torn up, they'll need to spend a lot of time recovering and Columbus would probably have to wait longer for Castile to recover, because virtually all the other sea-going nations, from Portugal to England to Venice and Genoa, rejected him. Which means that the discovery of the Americas via Columbus would have to be delayed atl by a few years.

Hlanus (talk) 15:40, May 7, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Here's my projected vision of Europe in the future: the War of Castilian Succession will end largely the same date and same way in terms of peace treaties. The Castilians will take a few years, say three to six,rebuilding their fleet, so Portugal should have the North African trade largely to themselves in that time. The time and money invested in the navy should allow the Portuguese to enter the Indian Ocean earlier than otl, while for the Castilians it should take longer to complete the Reconquista, meaning the Kingdom of Granada, as Navarra is in the midst of a civil war, so it should collapse earlier. At the same time, Columbus should give up on Castile as it does not have the time or money for him, so he'll head back for England, the country with (from what I can see) the best economic resources to finance him. It'll take longer for him to reach the English, though I suspect that they will be more cooperative, just to get rid of him. I estimate that the Reconquista of Spain and Columbus's voyages should occur around 1495, with maybe a few months difference in-between.

BTW, where do you get all this info? If I had it, I probably would not have made as many mistakes with this timeline as I did. Thanks for the feedback.

Hlanus (talk) 05:41, May 8, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I know. The new bullets I think were too effective for the depicted battle: my guess was that they would have a noticeable advantage in range and accuracy due to their more aerodynamic shape, but not by much, due to the lack of rifling in the guns and their relatively short barrel length (which is why sniper rifles tend to have noticeable longer barrels than the ones issued to regular foot soldiers). I figured the Chinese would figure out the new shape and apply it more to their field and ship cannons, and once they receive matchlocks, probably from Portugal, then they would adopt this shape to their handguns and long firearms. Also, much of the battle does not make sense, and I am trying to rectify it, but it has been a busy day for me. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Hlanus (talk) 02:40, May 11, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I just figured the Chinese would look further into it until they received matchlocks, though I am wondering which route the matchlocks would arrive from. In otl, they received matchlocks from the Portuguese, though I read on wikipedia that the Ottomans had matchlocks in the 1440s, and I (briefly) thought they could have travelled eastward into Persia and the Mongol Khanates, exposing the Chinese but without convincing them to immediately adopt them as standard military equipment, though this was probably derailed by the Ottomans high trade prices and the fractious situation of Central Asia in the mid- and late-15th Century. Hlanus (talk) 03:32, May 11, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Just a passing fancy of mine as I indicated. Anyway, I have an idea of how to end the Mongol conflict: after a few decisive victories over Dayan Khan, the Chinese pressed Amasanj to open talks. In the talks, they propose that Dayan Khan rule over the Khalka/Eastern Mongols while Amasanj rules over the Oirats. The talks are timed to keep both "khans" of relatively equal strength, with Amasanj dependent on the Chinese. Also, in this timeline, when should the Portuguese reach the Indian Ocean? I am guessing earlier than in otl, though they might establish trade just marginally earlier than otl, or so I guess. Hlanus (talk) 04:11, May 11, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Thanks for the feedback. BTW, you mentioned that Christopher Columbus's brother as a possible "discoverer" of the Americas. I tried to find him, but I found several. I think the best candidate would be Bartholomew as he was in France, which is a relatively short trip to England or the Netherlands. He might be able to convince someone to fund his voyages to try and bypass Portugal (as well as get him to shut up). This is just my best guess, but I am thinking that Britian would probably be the better candidate as the Netherlands were ruled by the Habsburgs and France was tied up in the Italian War of 1494-1498, where Charles VIII was fighting against the Holy Roman Empire in Italy. Let me know if this is wrong or mistaken. Hlanus (talk) 17:35, May 11, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

OK. If I understand you correctly, Christopher Columbus will continue trying to talk the monarchs of Castile and Aragon into his plan, while Bartholomew works in France and England to try and persuade them. If/when he persuades Henry VII, he'll send for Christopher and he'll make the voyage on England's behalf.

In the meantime, I have Portugal reaching India, specifically Diu, in the early 1480s. They'll open trade soon enough, no later than 1488, as you said. When they do, they'll discover the relative lack of interest in European goods save gold and silver as well as their military edge. They will probably turn back to organize a more battle-appropriate fleet then return near 1490 to "persuade" the locals to their point of view, showing the Ming their military weakness and convincing them to pull ahead. I figure that as China has more trading posts and a more "extroverted" approach than otl, they'll feel the Portuguese power sooner and stronger than otl. This will motivate them to improve their weapons, probably by buying (indirectly) matchlocks from the Portuguese as well as to find a means to bypass them, leading them to discover the western coasts of the Americas, thought probably around the 1510s or so. Hlanus (talk) 04:06, May 12, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I may be speeding things again with the timetable. Perhaps if the Chinese hear about the silver in the New World, then they will be interested because otl they had huge demand for silver but refused to open local mines for fear of them falling into private hands. I am guessing that merchants would be the first to venture, seeking profit, and if they see it and tell the Emperor, then there will be a national interest. For now, the Chinese are content and are not looking for trouble or new discoveries. I said that there won't be voyages of exploration for the heck of it for a while, probably concurrent with those of the Europeans.

Speaking of which, how would the Chinese get their matchlocks from the Europeans? I doubt the Portuguese are going to just hand them over, and trading might be stretching it. Probably through back channels such as local Indian merchants, but I could be wrong. Also, otl, the Portuguese do start taking over parts of Asia when they become more established, and when they took over Malacca, the Chinese immediately took action. With China's interests stretched to India and elsewhere, would they not feel the Portuguese earlier and take action earlier? Hlanus (talk) 05:10, May 12, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I figured that after nearly 100 years of commercial expansion, the Chinese would perceive things differently. The Confucians that criticized the fleets are dead and their views marginalized by their attempted coup against the Emperor. Chinese merchants are one of the Empire's chief sources of revenue, and with her extensive reach into, and grasp onto, the maritine spice and silk trades, I figured China would be heading at least partially into a different direction. Still too soon, or not enough need yet?

BTW, "That's why China hated it". What did China hate? Having to deal with foreigners? I know that one of the Confucian objections to trade and colonization, and indeed the Treasure Fleets, was that if China needed something from abroad, then it indicated that she was not self-sufficient and thus lacking something as a nation and a society. Is that what you meant? Hlanus (talk) 07:41, May 12, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

So then what could Zheng Jun and his cohorts have safely done? I am trying to have them prepared somewhat for the confrontation with Portugal, akin to otl but the court, as I have said, are pretty laidback, with the settlement of the Mongols and the rich returns from the trade. Also, with the Portuguese so far away, so to say, they see no real reason to prepare. I figured if Zheng Jun worked with local Chinese merchants (sorry for the ambiguity) he would get some funding for his preparations, and if he framed it in the right way, the court MIGHT turn a blind eye to his deeds, as long as he kept Chinese military secrets in Chinese hands. Not sure if this would work. I project that in the early 1500s, circa 1510, China and Portugal will collide when the Portuguese begin expanding eastward into Sri Lanka and Malacca, and then China will be forced to face their relative military backwardness, though higher numbers will give them a slight fighting chance. It will also give Zheng Jun and his cohorts the support they need to complete their ideas for military reform, though if at least some Chinese ships were armed with these new weapons, the court would have real proof of their efficiency, though numbers will probably be the Chinese chief advantage. Hlanus (talk) 18:33, May 13, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I checked the routes taken by Columbus, and one of the things he tried to do was take advantage of the trade winds. Would he have just sailed directly southwest and not bother with the Iberians? As for his ships, what WOULD he have called them if he was working for England instead of Spain? In the meantime I will delete that user's contribution until we can get that fixed.

I will also fix the portion about Zheng Jun and the Portuguese as well.

As for the battle with the Mongols, I reduced the ratio between Mongols and Chinese and made it clear that it was unexpected developments than the change in ammunition that saved them. All the new ammunition did was startle the Mongols for a moment. Also, rather than a complete victory for the Chinese I made it a pyrrhic victory at best, with half of their forces destroyed in the first battle. How can I improve the battle any more without making it a complete route for the Chinese? 68.231.174.243 18:35, May 14, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I figured that if they were going to conduct trade, then they would need a means of communicating with the locals or the merchants, who were predominantly Chinese, Indian, and Muslim, which is why I, and Zheng He, chose those languages. If they would not know Chinese or Hindi, I think the closest they WOULD know would be Greek and Latin, though would those be enough to open a dialogue?

As for the exploration route, I figured that if Columbus wanted to reach the Spice Islands, he would travel in a way to reach them, meaning going southwest. Since Cabot is traveling due west, should I just put them together in the same boat, so to speak?

As for the names of his ships, would they be named by Henry VII for English nobles or generals? The only named ship of the Tudor navy that I know of is the Mary Rose.

As for the Mongol battle (near Buuntsaagan Lake I presume), I think the Mongols WOULD have rode around the Chinese out of the range of their weapons and rained arrow after arrow on them, then close in when the Chinese were tired and hungry. The problem is that this was not MY battle, I just tinkered with it to reduce the effectiveness of the weaponry and the degree of being outnumbered. I am trying to figure out which to keep and which to discard, though perhaps I should just rewrite the whole thing from scratch, though what do I do about that picture?

Hlanus (talk) 16:21, May 15, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

OK, so Columbus will sail due west for England while John Cabot will head for the Caribbean, if I am not mistaken. I am writing that Columbus will stop in Iceland for supplies and repairs, which should be easier to obtain than any territories held by Portugal or Spain, though not by much since Iceland's chief exports are wool and fish. On a side note, you mentioned that fishermen knew of the Great Banks, so I am guessing that Columbus would have known or at least heard about "Vinland". If he did, do you think he would have stopped for supplies and repairs? Probably as sea travel was very dangerous at the time, and any opportunity would have been great. Even with the Norse colonies in North America and Greenland abandoned, there would have been some buildings and maybe some equipment usable in the latter, and lots of wood and food in the former.

As for the language thing, did the Europeans have ANY way to deal with that? Or was it just go ahead and hope for the best? I doubt the Chinese or Indians would have known any European languages except maybe Greek or Latin, and that would have been from the ancient times, so the two sides would only be marginally understandable at best. The Arabs would probably been the best for the language problem as they were trading around the area, both with native rulers and merchants, as well as other Arabs. I am sure that extensive contact would have left the Arab merchants somewhat multilingual, though probably just enough to haggle and do business, but something is usually better than nothing.

As for the Mongol battle you mentioned, my plan is to rewrite it so the two parts are switched around: first the Mongols open up with arrow fire while circling the Chinese caravan with their horse archers to soften them up and buy them time to bring up the rest of their force; then, when they think the Chinese are faltering, they charge. My only concern is that picture, as it will have to be replaced. You have any ideas on how to do that? I have already sent a message to the original maker, but I have not heard back from him yet. Hlanus (talk) 06:23, May 16, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Regarding Iceland, I know that it would be very dangerous with the ice and the cold, but I doubt that Columbus or anyone at the time would try to sail directly west without stopping for anything. Even if the Icelanders are dirt-poor due to erosion and poor climate, they would at least be a rest-stop for his ships. Also, he MIGHT have gotten some idea of what lay ahead, as the Icelanders were basically a go-between for Norway and Greenland until the colony died, which was circa half a century in the 1490s. And the Greenlanders made trips to North America and the north of Greenland to get ivory, polar bears, and falcons for trade, and wood for more basic needs. It would not be much, but something is usually better than nothing.

As for the wood and food, I am referring to wild sources, such as fish and berries and trees, not cultivated ones. Those would have required a recently living population to sustain them, which the natives did not do after the Norse colony died out, or an excellent refrigeration system. Also, this refers to Vinland itself, not Greenland, as Greenland's trees were almost all cut down by the time the colony died out. All they would be doing would be scavenging the ruins in Greenland, and foraging in the woods in Vinland.

As for the "newly-built ships" line, I am guessing that this refers to the English ships. I wrote that they were rebuilt along carrack lines from Spain and Portugal because (as far as I know) the Tudor navy did not make these changes earlier, otl or atl. They simply upgraded the ships they already had to go along the Portuguese lines. Hlanus (talk) 16:22, May 16, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Greenlanders DID trade walrus ivory up to a point, then it dwindled when it became possible to import ivory from India and Africa, then it went out of fashion all together. They also traded other products, in exchange for wood, iron, other foodstuffs, and social and religious contracts. Iceland was used as the go-between for Norway and Greenland, then interest in Greenland products dwindled, the Little Ice Age made cattle-raising and farming less productive, hostile relations with the natives, which were mostly Inuit, not Dorset, who were largely assimilated by the end of Norse Greenland history.

The rest, all right. Hlanus (talk) 05:45, May 17, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

What do you mean by "Great Banks"? I am basing this on a map of the north Atlantic and where Columbus would have ended up if he went due west from Bristol, which would have put him around Newfoundland, which is a combination of taiga and tundra.

One question about the Mongol battle you pointed out. I have written that the Mongols are basically besieging the Chinese caravans, hoping to starve them out, when Amasanj begins to raid their supply lines and reinforcements. Fearing an attack without reinforcements, Dayan Khan decides to withdraw, but to be safe, he wants to head straight east to avoid the areas that were raided, which could invite the Chinese, albeit unlikely, out to attack him. My guess is that the Chinese will simply let him go, though they will counterattack if he does. As his objective by this point is to escape than to fight, this is very unlikely. Basically, it is just you leave me alone and I leave you alone for both sides.

Hlanus (talk) 07:27, May 17, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Thanks for all that. Almost done with the Mongols. Just one thing: there seems to be a functional break between the skirmish and the final phases, as the skirmish did not noticeably drain Dayan Khan's strength and forced Amasanj to invest more troops to the supply caravans. I need to put in a reason why they retain a degree of parity in power, and I was thinking of Dayan Khan launching an attack on a key military target, and meets some deadly surprises, perhaps the new artillery and ammunition. He will probably launch a feint attack on some other target to grab Amasanj's attention and then go for it, but the only target that I can think of that would be worth attacking would be Karakorum, and I doubt either Amasanj or Dayan Khan are stupid enough for such a setup. Karakorum would be primarily a propaganda victory against Amasanj as a Mongol leader, akin to saying that the true Khan has returned to claim his capital, so Amasanj would probably never leave unless it was a real emergency, but I do not know of anything that could be urgent enough for that.

Just a few questions regarding the English, how long would it take for them to figure out that they discovered a continent? I suspect that Columbus would want to go further west along the coast, which should be a bit of an eye-opener. After a few months, he'll probably turn back and inform the king on his travels. During which, he'll probably encounter some of the native tribes, if he has not already encountered the Beothuk in Newfoundland, but I am unsure which tribes he would encounter in the northeast North America or what products, save some crops and furs, he would be able to obtain from them. This would probably stimulate exploratory curiosity but probably no rush to colonize, since, as far as I know, there is no gold or silver to plunder, and the English are not as interested in converting people to Christianity as are the Spanish and the Portuguese. I suspect that it will take a while for the English to figure out the extensiveness of their discovery, perhaps about 1505 or so but I am not sure.

I am wondering how information about the New World travelled outside Spain in otl, because that is probably how it will travel atl to China, which as far as I know is the only way the Chinese would seek the Americas out intentionally. Also, I read something about the Treaty of Tordesillas, which basically split the world between Portugal and Spain, which helped stimulate their exploration as well as other nations. I am guessing that this will still be in effect so maybe, MAYBE, the English will try and keep quiet about their discovery, as the Spanish and Portuguese will try and claim their "rights" it, and if this is the case, then it will probably be a while before China ever hears of it, as their main link to Europe is the Portuguese.

Hlanus (talk) 05:16, May 19, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

So the whole Mongol section is fine as it is? Just making sure.

You mentioned new names for the Continents. How about Columbia for the Northern one, and a different one for whoever discovers South America? Or would it be Columbia for both? Figuring that we refer to the Americas as though they were discovered by the same explorer, Amerigo Vespucci, the latter seems more likely.

As for colonies, I am thinking the English, due to their head start, will probably be the first, circa, 1510s or so, but I doubt the colonies would get very far, as in otl. Same with Portugal and Spain in Brazil and the Caribbean respectively, though I suspect the Portuguese would arrive last, for in otl the cost of occupying Brazil compared to the profits from their trade in Asia kept them relatively uninterested. Spain would probably colonize second, which raises one possible implication: Hernan Cortes arrives later than in otl, which means that the Aztec leader may not be Moctezuma II, as he was born 1466, so he would be in his forties when the first colonies arise. By the time Hernan Cortes arrives, his consolidation efforts would be further along than in otl, so the Aztecs may give a more resilient defence, though disease from trade routes would still take their toll. All-in-all, the Spanish would likely have a harder time conquering Mexico than otl, but they would accomplish it, unless the Aztecs received a major technological boost, say guns and steel. China is one candidate, but probably not: no real reason to go save curiosity, and even if they did arrive before Cortes, a big "if", the Aztecs' religious practices would likely sour relations.

Just some ideas.

Hlanus (talk) 06:51, May 19, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

All right, here's where I'm going. Spain, under <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 19.1875px; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; display: inline !important; float: none;">Juan Ponce de León, will discover the Caribbean, and the Portuguese will discover Brazil. England will be the first to colonize, due to their headstart, Spain will be next, then Portugal, then France, then lastly, China, though they may be the first to colonize the Pacific coast of North America, due to their geographical proximity. Spain will probably hold on to Peru as in otl, due to disease, diplomacy, and technology.

I am thinking the continents will be named Brazil and maybe Vinland, or a Angloized/Latinized version of it. And as I said, the only way the Aztecs or the Inca could resist conquest would be if someone, Chinese, English, Portuguese, or anyone gave them a huge technological boost, and there is no real reason for this, save trade and tribute, and they will probably never make it in time. All they COULD do would be arm tribes resisting the Spanish conquest/occupation.

Thus, the likely division will probably be akin to otl, with the Portuguese in Brazil, the Spanish in the Caribbean and Mexico, and the English in Maine and Newfoundland. The Chinese will probably get the Oregon, Washington, and Columbia area. The French, I am not sure, though Louisiana would likely be theirs as in otl. Hlanus (talk) 17:59, May 19, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Thanks for the fyi. Just for quick clarification, is it all bad, or are some parts still good? My guess is the former, but I just want to be sure.

The natives are not "abandoning" the area. The area is along the coast of Maine, where the natives, such as the Passamaquoddy and the Mi'kmaq, do seasonal migrations from the coast in summer to the forests in winter, and as the voyagers are all departing in summer and arriving in late autumn, it is just bad timing, which is why Henry here schedules the next one to arrive in summer, to try and test this idea.

As for the bay, I thought about naming it after the saint of the date on the Catholic calendar they discovered it, but I could not find the calendar in time. As for the river, I figured that he would simply try a longboat and do a cursory look and not go very far up the river, not past where it begins to narrow.

China "colonizing" would probably begin with trading posts and would be largely unofficial, as there are several "colonies" in SE Asia, despite the government's strict policies. Also, once the officials find mineral wealth in the area I highlighted, news of it will attract prospectors and laborers and government officials. As for the word spreading, it does spread after the first voyage; the second only confirms and strengthen the stories with the added content. Hlanus (talk) 00:25, May 21, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Regarding Chinese "colonization", the Ming Dynasty will fall around the 1600s, akin to otl. Would not the new dynasty, depending on who they were and how they rose, have a different attitude to colonization? Besides, when the mineral wealth is discovered, would not the court want to keep close tabs on the prospectors and merchants, meaning an expansion of the trading posts? Probably not go further than that initially. Hlanus (talk) 02:13, May 21, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Let me cut to the chase: with all the changes that you have seen thus far, how will this differ from otl by the mid 1600s? Will China be able to escape being predominated by European powers? Will she hold power and influence in the Pacific region? Or is my reach exceeding the timeline's grasp? If it is, then is there much point to all this? Hlanus (talk) 02:44, May 21, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Thanks for the update. Just so you know, I am basing Cabral's adventures on what happened otl, because I cannot see any reason for them to be different. As such, I am basing it on preliminary research I did on wikipedia on the Second Portuguese Indian Armada. I came across three hypotheses as for why he turned southwest: he was trying to reach the Azorres to repair his storm-battered ships; he was searching for ships lost in the storm; he was trying to catch a favorable wind (which the article said was most probable); and, most improbable, he was searching for Brazil. The trade wind information, however, was probably based on Columbus' prior discoveries, so maybe you're right about that part, unless the Europeans already had good information on the winds in that part of the world.

As for the king telling them not to take people, again that is based on otl, with the Castilian monarchs and Columbus. I figured the Beothuk, who in otl, were mostly hostile and elusive in the face of European explorers and settlers, may have caused enough trouble to convince the king to revise his policies regarding the kidnapping of natives. In fact, due to their homeland's position relative to Greenland and the probable location of Vinland, they may have been the skraelings mentioned in the sagas regarding Vinland and why the colony failed, though the term itself was applied to the Inuit as well, so it was more akin to the Greeks' use of the word "barbarian".

BTW, what do you mean by this quote: "would not buy the English claims of world size or having found Asia"? And by "turnover", do you mean the transition between dynasties? Hlanus (talk) 04:45, May 22, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

On the blankets, I read that smallpox can be spread via scabs or fomites, or maybe I am reading that wrong. Also, I read on wikipedia that "maize" is a Taino word for the crop, and as this is in New England, would not the Algonquian language equivalent be used instead? And the brackets are there to show people where things are otl so they know what it is that I am talking about. Perhaps a map would be better. If you have any ideas I would really appreciate it. Hlanus (talk) 16:09, May 23, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Just a clarification about Cabot and Columbus, in case it is relevant. Cabot is exploring the coast off Maine near the Bay of Fundy and further south. Columbus is exploring the area off Newfoundland and Labrador. While the natives did not rely on agriculture as much as the Iroquois further south and east, some tribes, such as the Abenaki, did have it and so he would have caught a glimpse of it. As his men travelled further south they would have seen agriculture planted more frequently, which would have reached Cabot's ears.

Anyway, about the map, I know where I can get the maps, but how do I write them so they read what I want? The only program I know of that can do something like that is Photoshop, but I somehow doubt that that is the right program.

Also, I have France beginning to catch on, as they were delayed by the Italian War of 1499-1504, so I am guessing that they would begin a few years, five tops, after the war ends. Probably explore the area farther south of where Cabot looked, and probably look around the Caribbean region as well, and then finish it with a trip up the Mississippi River. Louis XII of the House of Valois would be the king then, and some likely explorers are Giovannu da Verrazzano, the first, Jacques Cartier, and Sieur de Robervall.

Lastly, one thing I am wondering is whether the Spanish colonies in the Caribbean would have a disadvantage regarding labor, as the Europeans initially enslaved the natives, as in the case of La Navida under Columbus, but with disease and warfare dwindling their numbers, and hired labor being relatively expensive, due to the cost of transport across the Atlantic and the low numbers of settlers, meaning that they can demand high wages, then it would only be a matter of time before they turned to the slave trade, especially in the Caribbean when they began planting cash crops over mining for gold. But with Africa being largely under Portugal's sphere of influence, would they be willing to do that due to their rivalry? Or am I missing something because slavery in the Americas is not one of my specialties. Maybe they would use indentured servants as the English did in the Americas, and later a system similar in Australia? Hlanus (talk) 16:09, May 24, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

The concept that Brazil and Vinlandia are connected is as of now just an idea that Vespucci is entertaining, out of speculation. Until someone, probably from France or Spain, reaches Mexico and explores both north and south of it, they will have no idea that they are connected, and that in and of itself would take several decades, probably not until the mid or late 1500s at the earliest.

As for the whole Labrador natives thing, both the Inuit and the Beothuk are resilient to outsiders, and Columbus' treatment would not smooth things over. The history of disease would also leave a sour taste. The guns would only ameliorate the tensions to a degree. If the tribes were in conflict with the Iroquois, then the chance to acquire an advantage over them would lead to an "official" end to tensions, though the tribes are nowhere near the Iroquois, so that does not work. I am guessing that they will have to remove the natives by force instead of trying to trade with them then. On the issue of agriculture, would not Cabot have encountered natives with agricultural produce they acquired via trade? I am guessing not. I am just trying to figure out how much rewriting I need to do.

As for the Amazon, I know the river is huge and I had assumed that Cabral would see so from the size of the delta. Guess they are not correlated as such.

On the topic of Caribbean languages, from what I can gather, there are three major language groups: the Taino, the majority of the islands; the Cariban, which hold on the Leeward Lesser Antiles and the northern South American coast; and the Guanahetabeyes, which are restricted to the westernmost tip of Cuba. I know that they are very different, but these people have been in contact for centuries, and probably have exchanged some words, akin to French and English. This would not by any means help with language acquisition, but it would be noticed.

On the river cities, I expect that the cities have not been exposed to diseases yet, as the Spanish only arrived at the Caribbean a few years prior. Once the diseases strike, their decline will probably accelerate and Cabral would probably act on it to "persuade" the locals. I am planning to have the Portuguese take the cities over, if they can, instead of building their own. More efficient this way, though I am unsure if this would be feasible or not.

Hlanus (talk) 06:27, May 30, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

On the part of the Amazonia, I plan to have the Portuguese persuade the locals to gather at the cities, either by the lure of trade or the use of force, so they can use the cities to build their own colonies.

On the part of the Beothuk, I am planning for them to die out as a people no later than the 1800s. Too few of them, as you mentioned, and the English are settling earlier, which should hasten their demise. For now, they have time because the colony is really a stopping point for ships coming to and from England. Once they begin colonizing the area in New England and travel becomes more direct, Newfoundland should get a lower profile, but it should make no difference, due to disease and ongoing conflicts between the Beothuk and the colonists.

In Labrador, they will probably set up trading posts, but the real colonies will be in New England area. Just not conducive to agriculture, though the fur business is too good to pass up. I suspect that peace will be harder to obtain though, perhaps by the 1510s or 20s thereabouts.

By "new section" I assume you mean Gama's voyage to India. I will try to reword that though I am basing it on what happened otl because I cannot see any reason why it would be different atl until they reach India. I suspect that even then not much will have changed, except that Gama will probably be more restrained in the use of force near the city of Diu so as not to accidentally antagonize the Chinese. In the near future, circa 1600s, I am thinking India will become a de facto buffer zone between China and Europe, with eastern India and Bangladesh under Chinese influence, but not governance, and western and southern India under European and eventually British dominance. This is because Bangladesh and Ceylon are close to Sumatra and Malacca, and if the Portuguese begin messing with Southeast Asia, China will have to respond in some manner. Both sides will mutually agree on the spheres of influence due to China's historical influence in the area, which will be stronger atl. Over time, as India is taken over, I suspect that kingdoms in Ceylon and Bangladesh may seek closer ties with China to booster their own power, but more likely they will seek alliances with rival Europeans. Hlanus (talk) 16:07, May 30, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I figured China would not have the same type of influence on India that she had on Vietnam or Korea by any means, though definitely stronger than otl, simply due to her larger sphere of influence. Still, restricted largely to the easternmost fringes and Celyon, except for Diu which was built by the Chinese. Ming-Indian relations would probably be marked by increased trade between the Empire and the various kingdoms, with maybe, though highly unlikely, periodic tribute sent to the throne in the areas closest to Assam and Burma, just to stroke China's ego. Also, once the Europeans begin moving in, the kingdoms will likely turn to China for support in their conflicts, as well as try to play the Europeans against each other.

Also, I understand the areas that would risk China's wrath, but I am somewhat confused on the rest. OTL, the Dutch occupied the Spice Islands early on, and went to extreme lengths to secure their monopoly. ATL, however, the Chinese have trading posts along the length of the maritine trade routes and closer relations with the nations in the area, particularly their already strong allies, including Malacca and Tondo in the Philippines. I understand that the Europeans will trade in the area regardless of whatever changes occur, but would they still colonize the area as they did otl? I am thinking that they would be somewhat more restrained to avoid harming Chinese property and/or citizens, military or otherwise, but that would be about it. Otherwise, they would risk a war with China. Nevertheless, such a war would likely require a direct act against the Chinese. An indirect one would just put them on alert, but only to secure their personal holdings and personel. Also, once the dynastic turnover begins, they will probably pounce to take advantage of China's turmoil. Hlanus (talk) 07:28, May 31, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Remember atl, the Chinese do not sink or scuttle the Treasure fleets, though the Treasure ships are gone by now, so they have a larger navy than otl. Also, atl, they established trading posts all along the area, including the Spice Islands. I suspect that their sphere of influence would be somewhat larger and incorporate Taiwan and the Northern Philippines, the location of the Kingdom of Tondo whom the Ming had special diplomatic relationships with, though still centered on the Malaysian peninsula. Also, because trade is more important economically to the Ming, the Haijin order will probably not be reinstated as it was otl in 1550, so China will retain a large albeit somewhat outdated fleet well into the 1600s. The large Chinese fleet should be enough to deter overt European interference in the islands closest to China and her vassals. Even with technological superiority, the logistical and numerical advantages the Ming will enjoy would make a naval confrontation too expensive to sustain. Until the dynastic transition occurs, I suspect the Europeans are going to be very careful in dealing with Southeast asia, especially as they go closer to China.

On the other side of the Pacific, I am contemplating the fate of the Big Three Civilizations: the Aztecs, the Maya, and the Inca. The first two are no-brainers: they will be conquered by the Spanish like otl unless a miracle occurs. The Spanish are simply better able to project their power into the area, with their bases in the Caribbean and everything. The Inca, however, I am not so sure. Without the Treaty of Tordesillas, there is basically a free-for-all in the New World, with everyone who can send ships and men able to make a claim, so there's a race to colonize. My question is whether this race would extend to the Inca, because even after the Spanish conquer Mexico and the adjoining territories, there will be a delay in conquering the Inca because they will have to consolidate their conquests and will have to put down rebellions, just like otl. Once stories of the Inca and their wealth reach the Europeans, the countries best able to take advantage of it will be the Spanish and the Portuguese due to the geographic proximity of their colonies. If the Portuguese can expand their bases up the northern coast, they should be in a position to take advantage of these stories, albeit only to make contact with the Inca. Conquering would be very expensive and difficult, but contacting should not be much of a problem. If that is the case, then there may be a race to contact rather than conquer the Inca, as the first one to antagonize them will deliver their allegiance to their rival. If there is no race, then it all happens as in otl, and probably even easier because diseases will have travelled farther and deeper than otl.

Hlanus (talk) 15:37, May 31, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

If I understand correctly on the Inca, then once disease hits and the Inca Civil War hits, the Inca Empire will be divided into a series of kingdoms. Then the Spanish will ally with one to set up a base for the conquest of the others. Much like otl when they allied with disgruntled tribes against the Inca. I am unsure why there would be a race though. The only civilizations in the New World are the French, the English, and the Portuguese. The Dutch and the Chinese will come later but probably too late to take advantage of the Inca unless they somehow get there fast enough or the Inca hold out long enough, which will not happen here. With the Portuguese more interested in Asia, and the English so far up north, only the French are available for the race. Would there have been a real race, or at least a perceived one by the Spanish? If not, then the only drive in the race would be greed. Still a while before I write about the Big Three, but I want to be ready. 68.231.174.243 06:25, June 1, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Just so you know, I had my computer checked just recently that logged me out of everything, and I forgot to log back in when I wrote the comment above. Sorry about the mixup. Have a good one. Hlanus (talk) 06:32, June 1, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I read that the Spanish had to ally with certain tribes for when the Inca rebelled. That was what I was referring to. While the initial conquest was fairly straightforward, when the Inca rebelled and took over Lima, the Spanish needed allies to boost their armies. Then they stabbed their allies in the back. There's archaeological evidence from a dig site in Lima, which shows Inca soldiers from the time and place of the fighting being killed with both Spanish and local weapons.

BTW, you mentioned the Chinese setting them up as a vassal state. I am guessing that that means that the Chinese will encounter them before the Spanish set up a complete conquest of the area. The Spanish will probably rule most of the Empire, but perhaps a few remote areas near the coast will get by. That is what I am speculating based on what you said on my talk page. 68.231.174.243 17:15, June 1, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

As I said before, my speciality is in East Asian history, so I know virtually nothing of the specific voyages of discovery, especially in the case of the Portuguese. My main source is wikipedia, which said that he was assured by Gaspar da Gama that the city in question, Onor as I wrote, was a pirate nest and so he attacked. I figured that the only difference is that Gama will be more careful in his treaty terms to avoid giving the Chinese an opening to exploit or offending the Chinese in some way. Also, by "Would make far more sense to have a city be thought to have hosted the pirates last, and have them sack it" what did you mean? That "last" part seems to be out of place. If I am reading the accounts right, he was told that the pirate nest was in the city and attacked, which earned him the fear and admiration of the local raja that offered tribute to keep Gama from turning his guns to him. Just want to be sure that I am reading it right. Thanks for the feedback. Hlanus (talk) 09:01, June 2, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

One thing I thought about regarding Gama's mission is the influence of the Chinese merchants and the trading post at Diu. You are correct when you pointed out that the Chinese are not going to interfere, which is why Gama is restricted from directly harming the Chinese. One thing is how the Chinese will respond to a move that affects them indirectly, which is something Gama wants to be sure of. Everyone knows that if you go around killing a nations' citizens or stealing their goods, the country will respond in some way. The thing Gama wants to know for sure is will the Chinese respond to Portuguese commercial expansion in India so long as their ships and trading posts are untouched, and if so, how? He and Manuel I do not expect much, response, but they want to be relatively sure, because both know the Chinese have the logistical advantage if war were to break out at this time. His actions are going to get a response from the Chinese, but only so far as they will take note of it for later. I suspect that the primary difference is going to be the terms of the treaties he imposes on the states of India, and he will likely deal with Calicut differently.

One question: what is it about the dates being different? I understand that things are different, and that the mission will be different, but how are the dates different? With the losses the Cabral suffered, it would have cost time for the king to build up his fleet enough to undertake another mission to India while also supporting a mission to Brazil. Am I going too fast for Portual? Would it have taken longer? Hlanus (talk) 10:18, June 2, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I meant that Portugal would have to restrain themselves in terms of harshness and making themselves the favorities of India. As you said, competition. As Gama going after the Chinese ship, I am unsure why he would do that. I suppose it would be to find out what they were carrying, but I am unsure what he would be searching for. The only other reason I can think of is to find out where they were going to try and blockade Calicut.

As for China, I figure that by 1510, they would hear of the new lands, and with the new Emperor, may be curious enough to launch their own fleets of exploration, probably by 1515 at the earliest. Their exploration fleet will likely be built along the same lines as the Treasure Fleets, except that their flagships will be bigger, more decorated versions of war junks, but not as big or as gaudy as the Treasure Ships. My question is which direction they will sail: east, north, or south? East will probably be the last direction they would go. My money would be for them to go north, along the Siberian coast and into Alaska. I doubt that they would brave the open ocean unless they had little choice, and they would want to stay close to the coast for supplies. Hlanus (talk) 17:57, June 5, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

On a side note, I am wondering what the etymology of the Magdalen Islands is. I am wondering because I still have a set of brackets on Timeline 1424-1500 (Zheng China) that I want to remove but I do not know what the islands would be called atl. Once I know, I'll change their name and add them to the OTL vs ATL page. Thanks for the feedback. Hlanus (talk) 06:18, June 6, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Thanks for the help. BTW, on the Zheng China timeline, I have removed most of the biased material, so I was wondering if it was all right for me to remove it from the ASB-Biased category, I am not sure if I have this authority, however, and I might have missed some things. Please look it over and tell me what you think. Hlanus (talk) 15:49, June 13, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I put in Irene to indicate where they were more than anything. I think that the French would find people, just not the sedentary Mississipian culture that was based there. Probably foragers and fishermen who would be travelling there periodically, likely Cherokee, Creek, and/or Yamasee. I'll change it soon. Thanks for the heads-up. Hlanus (talk) 16:55, June 27, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I thought that a few mounds survived from this period in other areas, or maybe I thought wrong. Anyway, just a thought: would the French call the area they first explore Louisiana, or would that be reserved for their first colony? I am asking because here the French are first aiming to colonize what are the Carolinas and Georgia otl instead of Louisiana otl. The reason I am asking is because the king at this point is King Louis XII, and they are likely going to name the area in his honor. I just want to be sure. Thanks. Hlanus (talk) 04:38, June 28, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Thanks. I thought I made it clear that at this time this is all speculation. No one really has any idea as to the size or extent of Vinlandia and Brazil or their connection to each other. Guess I should reword that.

As for Zheng Zun, I briefly thought about him trying to winter in Alaska to avoid the worst of the winter, but the intense storms that the coast of the peninsula suffers undermined that idea, so I figured that he would be best to return to China to avoid more extensive or serious damage.

Hlanus (talk) 16:41, July 4, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I need to reword that I know. Would they consider these new territories an outreach of Asia until someone in the distant future explored the Bering Strait? I doubt Zheng Zun would explore it. Too cold, too much ice, and no incentive as far as I can tell in terms of furs or valuables worth pursuing. He would only explore it if the Emperor ordered him to, and I can not think of any particular reason to do so.

Just out of curiosity, when would these terms come into use? I do not like to keep referring to them as "new lands" or something like that. I just think it gets redundant and sounds rather lame.

As for the deaths from disease, I assume you mean that the Kamchatka peoples and the Inuit would not suffer epidemics as for example the Aztecs and Inca did. Just making sure. One thing about the Kodiak inhabitants that I postulated is that they might have fared better relatively than the Aleuts: greater island size and higher population numbers without higher population density. I sincerely doubt it so I did not put it in. Hlanus (talk) 06:03, July 10, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Just one thing. I am working on a piece for Japan, which becomes more expansionistic than otl, because China acts as a pseudo-buffer against the Europeans, reducing the perceived threat they pose to Japan. I figure that instead of invading Korea as in otl, as China's navy is larger and stronger and better able to cut off Japanese troops and supplies, Toyotomi invades the Ryukyu islands and Hokkaido, and eventually Japan moves north to Kamchatka Peninsula and Alaska. One thing, however, concerns me. I researched the Ryukyu Kingdom, which ruled the islands at this time, and found that they were partially a tribute state to Ming China, but maintained tributary status with Japan as well. Would this have posed a problem if Toyotomi wanted to invade? Hlanus (talk) 18:46, July 10, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

I figured that California would be pushing it. Just a clarification, they are at the very edge of California, like right at the Oregon-California border. By "go too fast", do you mean that they are sailing too fast for seven weeks, or that they would not reach it on this particular trip? By the way, you said "far past the point where the diseases will advance through the natives before they arrive". Does this mean that disease will hit the natives BEFORE they arrive due to trade connections? I am guessing yes, but I want to be sure. Hlanus (talk) 17:22, August 9, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

By "events in Asia", are you referring to contact with Europeans and their machinations in Asia? Or am I way off? Hlanus (talk) 18:12, August 10, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

True. The peace won't last forever with their "border", and once the Malacca Sultanate weakens enough, the Portuguese will be back. But when was the last time a border remained fixed by a treaty? This is more or less a quick fix. Besides, in another century or so, when the dynasty changes, the Portuguese and other powers will pounce. I suspect, however, that the Portuguese will not try and confront China or her vassals head on, least not for some time.

BTW, I am working on the Inca Civil War section, and I was thinking that will Huascar and Atahualpa fighting each other, maybe some of the tribes to the far north and south would take the opportunity to try and break away. I am looking for other major players, but these half-brothers were really all I could find, but I'll keep looking. Hlanus (talk) 16:29, August 11, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Good to be back. Bad case of writer's block and needed some research. Here's what I plan to write on in the 1500-1600 timeline: Akbar's rule in India in 1550s, Pizzaro (or some1 else as he's getting old) and Ataphualpa in 1540s, Russian expansion over Siberia in 1560s. I just want to fill this up then I can work on other pages. BTW, where do I mention Hong Kong? My guess is on the Emperor's Curiosity section.

Hlanus (talk) 20:29, February 28, 2014 (UTC)Hlanus

Oh yeah!
Wow! That's great. There is a slight buzz now whenever I visit my profile page, cuase it has admin on it :D That really is great. Would I be able to get started right away by deleting games declared obsolete (i.e not having completed 15 turns and dead)?

Plus, I'm getting to work with the map game issue soon by creating a blog post about things I think which could help. Please be sure to have a llok at it and tell me if it is viable at all please? Thank you again! :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 15:58, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

Ok. Deletion tag it is. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 09:26, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

Username
Hello.

I've been thinking about putting in a request for Wikia to have my username renamed (which would mean that all my edits and everything else will be transferred to the new account as well). I was wondering if that would be okay with you. If not, then I won't. -Kogasa  2013年4月27日 17:42:16 (JST)

PRC port, and a few other things
Xincunxiang is a city south of Tianjin in Cangzhou, Hebei province. I felt that it would be small enough and far enough from any blast area to the perfect place where a port could be built.

I wanted to ask you about a few things that were on my mind these past couple of days, regarding the ANZC, SAC and the entirety of the Middle East. Should we make the other to superpowers a bit more proactive? It's kind of odd that the USSR grows and changes, while these other, more powerful nations just sit by and don't do anything. (other than some tension in India perhaps)

My other question would be about the Middle East. I know that Fxgentleman is responsible for most of this region, but he hasn't really gone into anything that happened after 1984 with any of his articles. These areas could really be a great place to write about, lands basically untouched by Doomsday. Vladivostok (talk) 11:11, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

The Middle East really could be a place where we could do some good. The timeline as it stands would really benefit from a more comprehensive and active Arab community.

That is what I meant when I asked about the ANZC and the SAC. What have they done lately, not just what they thought about the conquest of Imperial China. They are too static, considering the OTL significance of United States policies and actions in the world. These two are the the World's policemen after all. Vladivostok (talk) 13:21, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

You know what? I think I'm going to ask him about it sometime today. I don't see how he'd say no to other people working on articles in the ME he hasn't done anything with for over a year and a half. Vladivostok (talk) 07:35, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

But what else can we do Ganon? Either stay quiet and leave the Middle East alone, or ask him again. Vladivostok (talk) 10:56, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

Well, we're still talking about it, both Fx's plans and whether he'll pop back on the site to finish the articles. Vladivostok (talk) 15:34, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

Free Quebec
The page "Kingdom of Quebec (Free Quebec)" was written by me on my old account (Emperor Andrew); It was connected to my facebook account by I disconnected it and forgot the email and password; Please don't revert my edits; if you need any proof what-so-ever feel free to ask.Sabovia (talk) 02:28, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

What proof would you like? Sabovia (talk) 02:28, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

LOTTED?
What does this mean?

"is not lotted by angry staffers."

EoGuy (talk) 04:33, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

Delete this image
Good morning, I would like you to delete the image "File:Flag of New Bastiglia.svg", because 1. It's messed up and 2. It's now substituted by "File:Flag of New Bastiglia.png". Sincerely, -- 08:57, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

Block my first account. Yay an Edit conflict (talk) 21:38, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

In th ruins of Rome
I know this. Might be alot to ask but I was wondering if you, a experianced wiki person and me a new bie could create a really cool map game. the game basically is where you are a person and you Crete your own kingdom after Rome fell. Will you help me with all the crazy map game stuff I don't get (Algorithum and more insight). --Octivian Marius (talk) 22:10, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

Italian Unification.
Hello.

I am designing an Alternative History board game, and have worked out that Italy ideally (for the game mechanics) should not unify. Is there a plausible way to avoid unification, what with (from my research) a lot of pro-unification feelings throughout the peninsular?

Thanking you in advance,

David Rain (Sometimes...) (talk) 16:15, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Could France plausibly have designs on Piedmont-Sardinia?

David Rain (Sometimes...) (talk) 17:29, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Will keep thinking then. Is it ok to bounce thoughts off you for plausiblity?

David Rain (Sometimes...) (talk) 08:39, May 4, 2013 (UTC)

Hi again. Would a (much) stronger Pope prevent unification?

David Rain (Sometimes...) (talk) 18:51, May 9, 2013 (UTC)

1983DD:Manchuria
I've used some of the suggestions from Vlad and yourself to improve the Manchurian Territory and Operation Manchurian Freedom. I was wondering if you had any other suggestions to help me improve the articles. Mscoree (talk) 21:01, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

What exactly is the problem? Vlad and I have both edited it accordingly. What else has to be fixed? Mscoree (talk) 01:39, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

I still don't know what you're talking about. What exactly needs to be fixed? Mscoree (talk) 12:32, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

i am very sorry. I know it sounds stupid but i did not know it was spamming. It will never happen again

I've lessened the severity of the involvement of Imperial China in Operation Manchurian Freedom. Anything else that needs fixing? Mscoree (talk) 23:39, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

I've also fixed up the territory page. Mscoree (talk) 23:59, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

I don't know what you want from me. That's what it said on the Second Manchurian War page. Mscoree (talk) 12:32, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Vlad told me that Imperial China's involvement was minimal, but politically they were in favor of the Manchurians. That is why I put that they supported them. Even if they did not do this officially, their people certainly contributed to the war economically. On the territory page I wrote exactly what Vlad said about Taiwan. I don't see how it's exaggerated at all. Mscoree (talk) 14:14, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Actually on the Second Manchurian War page it clearly states:

"The Imperials were being overwhelmed by the superior firepower of the USSR. However, by the end of March, the Chinese government in Taiwan openly sided with Imperial China, supporting them politically, as well as economically. 'Volunteer' units from Taiwan arrived two weeks later, on April 18th, as the ROC did not want to engage in an official war with Siberia. Seeing that the war could not be won by air superiority alone, the USSR started the invasion with a pincer maneuver, focusing on Songyuan and Baicheng."

This clearly states that Taiwan supported the Imperials, both economically and politically. It then says that people who live in Taiwan fought alongside the Imperials, labeling them as volunteers.

It then goes on to say this in the Battles of Songyuan and Baicheng section:

"The plan was conceived by both the Taiwanese and the Imperials to kill as many troops as possible."

This clearly states that the Taiwanese helped in the war in some way or another.

As for Imperial China's involvement in Operation Manchurian Freedom, I have removed several parts, stating that they secretly aided rebel groups, mostly financially. Vlad told me on the talk page for that page this:

"Also, Imperial China didn't engage the Siberians in so direct a manner. There was no warfare, official or otherwise, between them until 2012."

You appear to quote Vlad, saying that he told me to remove Imperial China's mentions, but that is literally all he said.

It also been stated (I forget where) that the Imperials were displeased after Operation Manchurian Freedom, believing that "the USSR annexed several of their fiefdoms to the north out of pure hostility and with brute force." After all that it's hard to believe the Imperials wouldn't supply or aid Manchurian refugees, who could possibly be hostile rebels to Siberian rule. Mscoree (talk) 20:54, May 19, 2013 (UTC)

I think I finally fixed it. Mscoree (talk) 01:47, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

What exactly remains? I believe I fixed everything in your last few comments. Mscoree (talk) 14:14, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

What do you mean by authority? Are the rebels still too organized and centralized? Mscoree (talk) 14:14, May 22, 2013 (UTC)

I'll tweak some words around, but I honestly don't think the rebels are as organized as you think. The majority of the resistance is described as small arms attacks and protests. The few organized attacks that are added are controlled by local, private warlords, who hire their gang to start a few fights. The militia, which is basically a few hundred farmers and what the Siberians would describe as terrorists, is hardly menacing to the Siberians. The only major rebel victory to speak of is "small groups of raiders were sent from Tongliao, destroying two Siberian trucks in the withdraw." Shooting up two trucks isn't much of an organized campaign. Mscoree (talk) 14:29, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

Also is there anything wrong with the Manchurian Territory page? I feel like you're tying these two pages together. If there is nothing wrong with the territory page I think that one can become canon now. Mscoree (talk) 14:31, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

Ebook Link
Here it is:

http://www.amazon.com/Forbidden-League-Planets-Adventure-ebook/dp/B00CKH4FAM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1367592123&sr=8-1&keywords=the+forbidden+army

What was it you were saying that one time about Mitro?

KingSweden (talk) 02:27, May 4, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Warning
Sorry, LG, I had originally named the pg with the Rebuild (Map Game) ending, but someone else changed it to RMG. Could you clarify that. I read the rules...Thanks for telling me.Daeseunglim (talk) 20:03, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

Question
Hello. I'm thinking about deleting some pages from one of my own timelines. Should I still put the delete template on my pages that I want to have deleted, or can I delete my own pages right away? -Kogasa  2013 May 10, 02:19 (CET)

RE: RC Port
I'm sorry, I assumed that the area was clear, as none of the maps show this specific sliver of OTL Russian territory being part of the Don Republic. I also failed to see anything that would suggest within the article itself that this area is a part of the DR. Could you please refer me to where it states that this is a part of the country.

Also, I didn't say that any land transport would occur any time soon, but there is certainly an advantage to controlling this part of Russia for the RC. Vladivostok (talk) 20:29, May 10, 2013 (UTC)

Oh well, it was kind of difficult to see if it was or wasn't part of it, as I wanted it to be right next to the Don Republic. Novoazovsk it is then. Vladivostok (talk) 07:48, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

Bessarabia in 13?
I came across something that I wanted to get your opinion on. Since it didn't happen until after the Napoleonic Wars, I left out from Russia. From what I read, Russia had their hands in the region prior to the POD here (especially since it give Russia piece of the Danube). Given that Russia would go through wars with Turkey again and again ATL, wouldn't it be possible to have Bessarabia be a part of Russia here as well?

I also came across that Russia (at one point) included the entire delta of the Danube, but lost it in the Crimean War. I am still not sure whether a Crimean-like war would happen here, but either way, I would love to read what you think. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:31, May 11, 2013 (UTC)


 * Glad to hear it is workable. Probably starting to sound like a broken record, but it is really shocking to see you here so early. I have been working on a list of wars for the timeline (I am feeling like there is too much peace here *evil laugh*), so no Crimean War is a good start. Tensions over the dissolution of the Ottomans would probably lead to war of some kind. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 03:34, May 11, 2013 (UTC)



Since we are on the topic of Russia, I was wondering if I can get your opinion the border between Korea (Japan) and Manchuria (Russia). Since Russia looses Dalian and Korea expands northwest of the Yalu River, I was considering just altering the border more. Since Russia would have to be more open to work out a deal with Japan, they might as well partition more Manchurian land over to them as well. This gives Japan more territory to colonize and a little more land to act as a buffer.

I have been playing round with the borders, and I think I have something workable. This gives Japan more territory without affecting the Chinese Eastern Railway. I have also divided the Liaodong Peninsula between the two (rather than giving it all to Japan [as you said]). My reasoning for which is to give Russia total control of Liaodong Bay (more protection). I would love to get your two cents on this.

While not an issue, I came across something that makes me happier to call Yingkou "Dalny." The river it is located on is called the Daliao River. Just pretty funny to find out. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 22:55, May 12, 2013 (UTC)


 * What do you mean by "control of the bay would mean relatively little"? As for Korea, I tends to see Korea being completely merged into Japan at some point (as in it is divided into prefectures and directly controlled by Tokyo). This is due to the migration of Japanese into Korea, and that this had already happened in Taiwan by WWII (OTL). But this is me.


 * I'm beginning to have second thoughts on this. If anything, my main problem is finding an aesthetically pleasing land border between Dalian and Korea.


 * I also had a thought I would love to get your opinion on. With Russia establishing peace with Japan and the US being an obviously non-existent issue, how do you think this would affect Japanese attitudes towards the Philippines? (especially after they gain independence). In my mind, it seems quite easy for Japan to annex it (being the only other area they can gain without bothering the European powers), but I'm pretty sure this wouldn't be possible. Though relation wise, I would assume they would be very close.


 * I am also considering how the relations between Japan and New Netherland would be (especially since there aren't too many positive sentences in OTL that include "FDR" and "Japan"). With NN right next door (Micronesia), I could maybe see a large number of Japanese populating the territory (more or less like OTL). Not sure this would lead to tensions or war, but interesting to think. Any thoughts? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 04:20, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

I believe I understand. I tended to see that since the entrance to the bay was so wide, neither Japan nor China could fully guard the entrance. But whatever, live and learn.

I think I am going to give up on the larger Korea idea. One of the main reasons I favored it was because it could have been a compromise for Russia to gain more area along the bay. But if Japan is going to be fussy on this issue, it would make much more sense to just give Japan the peninsula (and a land corridor) in exchange for safe access within the Yellow Sea. And as you mentioned, this new area would be administered differently from Korea around the time of this treaty, so no sense for Tokyo to be thinking on behalf of Koreans. I have uploaded a new map. This is more or less how I have seen it from the beginning.

Thank you for your input. If the Philippines and Micronesia avoid Japanese influences, I am wondering how they would express their imperialistic ideals with Europe remaining strong around them. Probably just building up their armed forces, building on the areas they do gain, and becoming a great power in their own right. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:34, May 14, 2013 (UTC)


 * Now you have turned my world upside-down. So let me see if I have it right. It wouldn't matter what border Russia gets in the region because they would dominant it. Giving Japan a piece of it would (at the least) give them a sense of security in the region. From what you were telling me before, I was getting the message that Russia was going to have to kiss-up more to work there.


 * Never really though of that as a justification for Japan's actions OTL (being kicked around), but it makes sense. Though in Russia's defense, it did take them centuries to get to its size and global power (in the cold, no less), where it took Japan decades to achieve the same (and coming from an archipelago society). But anyway, nice to see some positives from a liberal Russia.


 * Since the topic was originally about Bessarabia, I also came across another area that I would like to get your opinion on: . Originally part of Sardinia, it was annexed by France (which it remains to this day). While it was taken during the French Revolution, it was given back, only to be taken again decades down the line. Any thoughts on them taking it here (possibly during the Revolutions of the 1840s?)?


 * I also had another realization. What of the microstates? Monaco, San Marino, Liechtenstein, Andorra, etc. Would they remain or would they get merged? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 04:52, May 16, 2013 (UTC)

Really? That's the reasoning for Savoy being in France? Doesn't completely surprise me, he had "Napoleon" in his name. Didn't he also attempt to take Mexico? I now have to read more about him. ATL, nothing to worry about.

I decided to take a quick look at the microstates, and I came across two possibilities that I would like to get a follow-up on.

It looks like Liechtenstein had Austria to thank for its creation (in many respects), and it retained a close relationship with them until WWI (when monarchy ended). It appears it was tied to Austria, and the end of the monarchy is said to have played a factor in Liechtenstein being independent. With the monarchy remaining, and much of the smaller German state being absorbed by neighbors; wouldn't it make sense for them to have been absorbed into Austria at some point today? Or at the very least, it would retain a protectorate status to this day.

Monaco's independence appears to be linked to the French conquest of Savoy. Prior to which, they were close with Sardinia. Once France moved in, they prevented Monaco from merging with Sardinia (which it appears was favored). With Sardinia already expanding into Genoa and such, couldn't it be possible to have a merger here? If not, than I would say they may become a protectorate of some sort.

Not too sure about Andorra and San Marino. SM seems likely to remain independent (they pretty much went out of their way [kissing up to remain so). Though here they would likely share a border with Sicily and Venice. Given its name, maybe they would be closer with Venice. Andorra appears to be close with France (the French President appears to also have the title of "co-prince"). Maybe with the monarchy remaining they may be merged? Maybe a protectorate? I'm not sure. Any thoughts?

Also because it is rather confusing for me, what of the Crown Dependencies? Would they be merged into the UC (part of Britain or a dominion), or would it more or less have the same status as OTL? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 22:20, May 16, 2013 (UTC)

Doomsday Map
So what was the problem with the DD map I added. Vladivostok (talk) 16:46, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Very odd, I thought that the main map could be updated by anyone, at least that was how it was done in the past. Was the edit of lower quality or wrong?

Fx has privately assured me that he would be returning to finish it. But if you're referring to a concrete plan for the countries, then no. He has stated that he will be working on the Middle East up to the 2000s, however. Vladivostok (talk) 10:21, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Ok. Sorry, I didn't know that. :L  Imp (Say Hi?!) 11:28, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Hello i am Dixieleader and you nominated my page for deletion. Since I am new, what pointers can you give me to change my page to fit into the criteria.

Thanks,

Dixieleader (talk) 02:44, May 15, 2013 (UTC) Dixieleader

Human-Zombie War
Okay, thanks.

EoGuy (talk) 07:42, May 16, 2013 (UTC)

What  have i done so i know not to break it again. Sorry LG i wasnt doing it to break any rules. Can you tell me what the rule is so im sure i dont break it again please

DS|Fear the Mutated Dean Sims Bomb, Fear It 11:49, May 17, 2013 (UTC)

State College (Doomsday: 1983)
Hey, LG, I was reading the post for State College, and saw the map. I live in Montour County, PA, which is direcly next to the nation of State College. It does not say what sized nuclear bomb went off in Wilkes-Barre, but I think that by 2013 Montour and Columbia County would be raidation free. Now, you can check this out on http://www.carloslabs.com/node/20, and I did a test with a 100 kiloton nuclear bomb, and Montour and Columbia County were not hit by radiation, pressure, or the bomb blast itself. Now, I know that the radiation would have poisoned the river for some time, and possibly forced survivors to flee, but I just wanted to point out that State College could have expanded. ThanksDaeseunglim (talk) 12:32, May 17, 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for that. Another question- Did State College, North PA, Gettysburg, and Reading ever try to merge?Daeseunglim (talk) 13:15, May 17, 2013 (UTC)

Okay. This might sound odd, but are there any plans for the USA to reclaim all of the old US land? Are there plans in OTL alt hist users to do this?Daeseunglim (talk) 13:25, May 17, 2013 (UTC)

Sad...200+/- a few...less than Russia...Your country (Canada) are they unifying? It sounded like they wanted to.

Micronesia
I am just letting you know that I am cleaning up the "Micronesia" category. There is a distinction between the region which comprises of several countries and the independent state of the Federated States of Micronesia. So I would appreciate you not reverting my cleanups again. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 04:58, May 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * You didn't have to make it sound like I'm being a nuisance by saying "now I'm going to fix that". I was only trying to help out. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 06:01, May 19, 2013 (UTC)

Which "fool" are you referring to? Either way I can understand. If I have done something that you do not like, you know you can always inform me and I would be more than happy to revert them myself. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:31, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Well I wish you luck on him.

I personally think we do need a separate category. They are not rooted in history, and were specifically uploaded to have all possible combination of stars to use. They are not based in any historic relevance, with some he just posted to be mathematically correct (for instance, some flags are not the same as OTL's counterpart). Not to mention that there are over 70 files, it seems appropriate for them to be in there own category. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:42, May 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * I think I see what you mean. I certainly didn't mean for it to come out as a "glorification" or anything like that. But I tend to see subcategories as the category in question. For instance, I don't add every page of a timeline to the main timeline page. But if you feel it is needed, I have no objections. I have added the second category. If this continues to be an issue, I will remove it. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 00:39, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

So what you are saying is you don't like the fact that this cat is too specific. As in, you would prefer a category for all his work (not just US flags). The primary reason I did this is because there are over 70 files of virtually the same flag. Also given that he did this completely for this site, I also see them as site oriented. But if this continues to bother you, I will replace it with a solid category.

I do have one of these cats. I have made it a hidden category, which has it not show up on the page. I could also make the other cat one too. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:02, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

Cult of Liberty (1983: Doomsday)
I was thinking about the nomadic clans described in 1983: Doomsday. Since I doubt these tribes would pack much, as a way to make traveling easier, I imagine that they would create a religion based on American history to preserve the knowlege of American laws and traditions through storytelling. And since it'd be like a decades-long round of the telephone game there would be quite a few differences. Since the first instinct of a storyteller is to make it bigger than life to make it more interesting, stories of the Founding Fathers would transform from being great men to essentially demigods.Monuments like the destroyed Statue of Liberty and Mount Rushmore would become idols to be worshipped. This religion would spread with the clans and word of mouth, and would be a polytheistic religion based on the Founding Fathers and other icons of American history. Yank 20:07, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

NotLAH: Holy Roman Empire
I noticed your comment on the NotLAH HRE talk page. Care to explain why it "makes no sense whatsoever"? Mscoree

Each of those states, with some exceptions, is run by everyday folk and survivors. Austria, which is not a republic, has decided to sort these small survivor states as "duchies" for simplicity. You are judging the old HRE. This one is a military alliance that is named like the old one. In times like these, these people need every bit of help and nostalgia to grab onto. Your one point you made when you chose to insult my idea was that it has no purpose, based on the old HRE, but clearly this one does have a purpose. Fancy words aside, kingdoms and duchies aside, it's just a military alliance. When you're done throwing around your knowledge and disses about the old HRE and have an actual suggestion, other than saying my idea is ludicrous, then write it on the talk page. Honestly, I'm just trying to make the game fun for the people in it, not "family-friendly", or pleasing to the man behind the curtain. From what I've seen that's how games like Scramble for Africa (Map Game) die. Mscoree (talk) 12:58, May 30, 2013 (UTC)

I'll try to appreciate my ideas being called ludicrous next time. Apparently that passes for helpful feedback now-a-days. Since using that name is impossible maybe I'll change it, since it's your map game after all. Mscoree (talk) 12:34, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

Kaisers age.

hey i am wondering who wrote that storey called kaisers age.in which britain loses ww1.and then a man called winston churingman takes power in britain and starts ww2/.

Your Name
Your profile says to ignore it, but I must ask. That's from the Legend of Zelda, isn't it? Ganon? If so, do you have any other names you would have used?

I ask because I wanted to include you on the Althistory Wiki page in my timeline, considering you are among the most well-known users. However, I plan on having Japan in a Cold War so to speak with America during the 1980's, probably preventing the Legend of Zelda from being released here, maybe even from being created. So, in this hypothetical scenario, what would you have picked as a name? If Lordganon has nothing to do with that at all, tell me also. Thanks for your time (I know I've used a lot of it).

Doctor Evulz (talk) 00:29, May 30, 2013 (UTC)

Source code problems: night of the living alternate history
Hi. You appear to be online as I type judging by edit history. Would you mind taking a look at the Night of the living alternate history map game. There's something wrong with the source code, it's too compllex even to display visualy not just editing from the looks of things.

Thanks,

David Rain (Sometimes...) (talk) 09:43, May 30, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Figured it was something along the lines of that but my code editing skills suck so i d'dn't want to mess it up futher. Seems simple now!

David Rain (Sometimes...) (talk) 08:18, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

Never Unified China
I have checked Alexlee8991's user talk and it turns out he's blocked. Hence, can I adopt his timeline-Never Unified China?Ninjasvswarriors (talk) 08:20, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

What rules do you imply? Ninjasvswarriors (talk) 08:20, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

Hacked?
The chat went funny and about 20 people were on it, then when they all left, the bit that says who is on it went weird, and some people got 'shurkbuster' as a user, but others didn't, then when they clicked on it it went to G greg e, but Old Baby could see both, so they weren't the same, then G greg e left, then Deli got a virus alert from norton, were we hacked? Local (talk)

UAE and Bermuda
Greetings. Been a while, hope you are doing well.

Hope you don't mind me asking for a quick clarification. I have been working on the a list of Britannic possessions, and I was doing more reading on the UAE. I believe you mentioned that the emirates would on their own become crown colonies of the UC. However, I came across that much of the British-controlled territories in Arabia (pre-WWI) were protectorates for the most part.

Given the complexity of the region, wouldn't it make more sense for them to remain a protectorate (more or less like OTL's UAE with more British backing). If now, why do you think they would support further integration with the UC? Did the Emiratis want something like this OTL? I do know the country (OTL) has a large Indian population, could this be a deciding factor? Just curious.

Also, I came across an interesting fact today and it got me thinking. It likely not possible in any workable way, but I feel it is worth a second opinion. I came across that Bermuda was originally included in the Virginia Company. Also from what I have read so far, the Bermudans at the time were more pro-American and may have been the "14th state" (so I've heard). Population and distance were major factors to it remaining British.

My thoughts are on whether Bermuda could possible, somehow become part of Virginia. Already, I'm sure you think this is BS (sounds that way now that I am typing it in). But with the US gone, Virginia fighting a war with the UK over the Northwest Territory, and Bermuda not having much value to the British (aside from being a base), I was wondering whether these could be factors that might affect this. My idea (if it makes any sense) is that Britain agrees to hand over Bermuda as part of the peace treaty that ends the Northwest War (in which Virginia looses half of its claimed territory); with the Brits not seeing it as a major requirement (given no US, weak successor states, and the fact that the islands were not developed) and the islanders probably supporting it.

I'm sure it is a sucky, whimsical suggestion with no historic backing or sense. So please go easy on me. Either way, made me read about Bermuda. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 03:10, June 6, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for the feedback. Yes, I am doing well (as well as one can be I suppose).


 * Thank you for explaining South Arabia to me. However, I was more interested in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Am I to assume they are in the same situation as South Yemen? Though this now give me a follow up question. If there's going to be a "Federation of South Arabia" acting as a crown colony, what of the UAE/Trucial States? I remember you mentioning that each emirate would be on their own. However, couldn't a UAE-like federation be made as a crown colony? Or were the emirates there too disconnected to support such an arrangement under these circumstances? Since we are on the subject, what of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, and Qatar? I would assume if the UC gains Iraq, Jordon, and Palestine ATL (part of the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire) they would not be anything more than protectorates.


 * I knew it was a long shot, but it would've bothered me had I not brought it up. Sounded more plausible than another idea I had of NN purchasing Alaska. Also, what do you mean by "more amplified"?


 * Always happy to get feedback on my flags. An Iroquois chain? That is an amazing idea, and I will add it right away. Thank you so much. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 18:28, June 6, 2013 (UTC)


 * I just thought of a potential new territorial expansion for NN that I would love to get your two cents on (seems more plausible than Bermuda or Alaska). I recalled that Ecuador considered selling the Galapagos Islands OTL, with the US being a likely bidder. The US had some interest in the islands because they could act as a base to protect the Panama Canal. While the Nicaragua Canal (which NN helps build and protect) is in a different region, Ecuador may show interests in selling the islands ATL (especially after fighting a war of independence only decades prior) and NN would likely be the first bidder. Do you think this could be a possibility? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 03:04, June 7, 2013 (UTC)

Please forgive me, but I am a little confused as to what you are saying for South Yemen (you seem to be flip-flopping on me). Just to see if I got this right... Federation of South Arabia would be a crown colony, the Protectorate of South Arabia becomes a protectorate. Am I right?

I am interested in your Greater Syria idea. Though if I may suggest, could the rump Iraq (Baghdad state) be a part of this state? Since Iraq OTL was also ruled by a Hashemite and this rump Iraq being a landlocked nation, wouldn't it make sense to have them merge into such a state? Otherwise, a Kurdish state and Iran/Persia taking the Shia areas sounds alright to me.

In the long run, let me see if I got this right. The British have OTL Bahrain, Qatar, UAE, and the Aden regions of Yemen. Kuwait, Oman, Palestine, and eastern Yemen are protectorates of the British (would Lebanon be a protectorate of France?). "Iraq" is partitioned between between Persia, a Greater Syria, and a new Kurdish homeland (Kurdistan would also include all the other parts you mentioned). Syria includes the majority of the Levant and the Red Sea coast (including Mecca). Would this Greater Syrian state also include OTL North Yemen, or would they gain independence?

Not quite sure what you are trying to say with the Galapagos. You think NN could've taken them earlier? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:36, June 7, 2013 (UTC)


 * I have updated my map, and currently in the process of creating a more detailed version. So some of of the borders are not completely set in stone &mdash; rather a rough estimate.


 * Quite interesting to read about Lebanon (never quite looked into it before). Though I do have a question to help better my understanding. Why would Europe be so inclined to carefully draw borders for Lebanon to assure no conflict (especially since they did such a good job OTL). Am I to assume without the Ottomans being on the side of Germany ATL that there would not be any aggression towards drawing the borders? Aside from that, I used this map as a reference (my map excludes the two large Shia pockets and the Christian area at the south, but keeping the rest).


 * As for Palestine, not quite sure how much of Jordan to include. For this map, I included the are east of the Jordan river, creating a Golan Heights-sized corridor as the border (if that makes any sense).


 * Quite confused as to why "Hejaz and Syria" would become a naming issue (especially since OTL it was called "Nejd and Hejaz"), but it also depends on where the capital would be. Though I am quite curious as to why these two regions would've become united. Mind if I get your two cents? Other than that, I think I can manage the rest.


 * I am very excited to hear that the Galapagos can be NN's, but quite puzzled as to the loophole you have brought to my attention. I guess it's possible for NN to have early claims, but I don't think they should officially annex the islands until the late 1800s (during their imperial hype). Quite the puzzle.


 * Here is a quick timeline that I would like to get your two cents on. With Spain (and hopefully Britain) not interested in them, NN (and NE) would move in and use them as a whaling base. They islands would remain officially unclaimed land until the 1880s (or at the earliest the 1860s) when NN officially annexes them (during the chaos of the revolutions there). Sound okay to you? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:55, June 9, 2013 (UTC)



I have updated the map, hope it looks alright.

One of the reasons I stated it was interesting to read about Lebanon was because of its border redrawing and the fact that it is a Christian nation (or was meant to be). I think the border I drew (which is based on your suggestion) is alright. I also did your "West Bank" idea in Jordan. I also added the southern parts of OTL Lebanon into Palestine (since they would have been an enclave otherwise).

Makes sense for Hejaz, but why would they take over Syria in the first place? My only guess would be they "liberate" those areas from European interests. Am I on the right track?

Ignore the fact that the Trucial States and South Arabia are not divided (I will add those borders later on). I would also like to be sure that you said South Arabia would be divided into three independent protectorates, right?

Taking from your "lol", am I to assume you would like to see a complete Kurdish unification. I thought of it, though I can't think of a surefire scenario where this could work. My only thoughts turn to Russia (who would dominate this part of the the continent). Given Russia's sphere of influence in this part of Persia, maybe they nudge this new border to happen? Since we are on the topic, you did mention Russia would include a bit of Iran. Do you think they might try and include more than a bit? I know the Russians had influence over the Caspian Sea, do you think they may simply annex the coat? As for how far they would annex, I would probably say no more than the Caspian coast, and possibly including the Turkic parts (Azeris and Turkmens). But I don't know.

Sounds alright with the Galapagos. However, I don't think (rather don't support) the idea that the islands would be less populous. Ignoring the fact that I like the idea of this becoming a kind of settler colony for NN, I would think given the larger population of NN that there would be somewhat of a migration to the territories. The Galapagos would be the safest and most successful area to move to. While I didn't picture it to have a larger population, I sure wasn't expecting it to have a smaller one either. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 20:30, June 10, 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the long delay, but I think I had a crash and need to take a break from this topic (I think you can understand). I will come back to the Middle East soon, but I wanted to take a different look at an old topic. Re-reading your comments and looking more into how the history may come out, I think I want to eliminate the division of Cyprus. If I am reading you correctly, you seemed to state it could go either or. Given the chaos that the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire would bring (particularly between Russia and Western Europe), I would think that Greece could easily take the whole island with little Turkish opposition or Greek caring. I think I am reading it correctly, but feel free to correct me. I look forward to your response. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:51, June 21, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for the late response. I didn't realize the Turkish population had shrunk, but it doesn't surprise me. But timeline-wise, I don't really find much interest in dividing the island (especially into three). From how I am seeing it now, Greece would acquire the area (along with other areas) in the "dissolution war." Combined with (likely) no British rule, I don't really see Greece worrying about any Turks on their new lands, and the Turks wouldn't be able to challenge them.

For me, keeping the island united and incorporated into Greece shows more interest. While no war on the scale of OTL, I show interest in how the Gecco-Turkish relations would work on the islands, and possibly lead to tensions. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 04:04, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Das Vaterland
Hello,

I was just wondering about your categorising of Das Vaterland as biased. Do you believe that any surviving Nazi Germany is impossible? I was planning on changing the government further down the line.

The B (talk) 12:14, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

Navigation Box??
Hi there, I was hoping you could help me out. For my Alternate History I have a number of various pages I want to be all linked up. I was wondering if you could send me a link on a page that tells me how to make a navbox template? Thank you!

Natives and european germs
question roughly how many generations would it have taking for the natives of the new world to get some sort of natural defences against european diseases? just out of curiousity because im working on a part of my time which i need that information for.Nkbeeching (talk) 17:31, June 12, 2013 (UTC)

ps thanks in advance for any info you can give me.

its for the new world part of my tl the spanish are occupied in europe sincefrnce is no longer the  dominnt power, and this stall their colonization by a few decades, instead french refugees are the ones who come into contact with the aztecs and form a sort of cordial relation with them, i currently having the azte empire suffering massive plagues but slowly transforming the aztec tributary stat into something a little more advanced (not by much yet but enough to withstand future spanish attempts to conquer then) and just a tiny immunity is enough for me if it means that they dont all die out by the time anoculations come out its all good. ihave the aztecs going through several revolts by those who resist the reforms, andthe french teaching the aztecs about metal casting and european agricultural praactises along with selling hem some horses, still havent had them trading fire arms but that will come later.Nkbeeching (talk) 10:03, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

alright ill see what changes i can make but what i eplained about the timeline is slightly out of context,is their any way for a native state to survive in meso america? if not ill have t oscrap my entire new world part and start  new one. its for my A darker place timeline, ive been trying to be plausible as much as possible and i think ive done a good job so far. Nkbeeching (talk) 16:44, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

ps ive been using non asb tl as reference for my aztec survival, includig a few of the featured ones.

alright ill see what i can do would a mixed people be able to hold their own? im not refering to the french, the french in my timeline are moving in small trickles that will eventually grow in OTL Gran Colombia, ill probably have the aztecs survive the first attempt by the spanish to conquer to conquer them but the next failing to and being absorbed into the spanish empire due to to fue being left to fight them, and unable to fight them anymore. i just think its a waste to get rid of all the material ive amde up till now and i would have to some minor adjustments to the western euro timeline. would it be possible for the aztecs to survive until atleast 1650, without major spanish attempts to conquer them, ill then have them cllapse and become the latest adition ot te spanish empire until the age of inddependence comes about. Nkbeeching (talk) 12:24, June 14, 2013 (UTC)

alright ill see howi change it up but the spanish are the only ones who have any real interest or capacity to conwuer the region in my tl the English are busy and overstretched expanding in north america and focusing all their effort on the spice route trying to get into asia, and the german people are just to busy destroying each other, could a series of smaller nutuatl states surge up in the place of the aztecs atleast like the zapotec, the mexica, and the Tlaxcala, with them either fallin to the spanish or moving north anf restarting a state in OTL Northern mexico southern USA, with the limited knowledge they gined from intereation with the spanish and from the french? Nkbeeching (talk) 10:53, June 15, 2013 (UTC)

ps dont forget the snatives in southern chile survived well into the 19th century.

well a few decades is all i need for the spanish, the french government has no capacity to establish a colony at thi point, the refugee settlements were created by individual merchants, and nobles who coould afford the coasts of the journey but after the two protestant wars france has been completey reduced to a meager shell of its former self under the shadow of a united spain, in my Tl steps are taking by the catholic kings to bring about a united crown instead of seperate kingdoms, and the loke i said the danes, the swedes and the germans are completely occupied ripping each pther apart. The Russians are breathing down the turks nrck and i doubt the turks could establish any new world colonies with haing to deal with the europeanss, i could have a few italians go there it would allow for a mixed italian, spainsh colony, since the italians are under spanish influence, that or the english attmpt to take it but lose the colon soon after.Nkbeeching (talk) 10:25, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

it has taking the spanish over 100 years, my western europen tl is already in the year 1640, im planning on expanding it soon enough, with out the french the spainsh conquered naples and have been exerting extensive influence over all the italian states except venice, though they no longer control the dutch which is under english control after the second protestant war, again the french are focused on  OTL Grand Colombia, though ill keep in mind the italians despite them being under spanish influence they still remain amongst the richest in europe. the english are largely interested in north america and the orient. that i wont changeNkbeeching (talk) 12:56, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

ill see what i do with the new world timelime, on the topic of the rest ive bee nspacing things out and have retained a non biased, the italians states are conqured by the spanish rather influenced by them after the first protestant, and in OTL England was offered tthre crown of thwe Neatherlands, elizabeth refused it thats why the remained independent though would have likely seperated soon after OTL i have worked with that after the second protestant war with the tudor house intergrating the house of orange the dutch are an assosiated state of England, it isnt asb and i have been working as much as i can to make the TL plausible, again ill work on the New World but i have the Euro Timeline good. well either way thanks for the help ill keep it in mind for mesoamerica. Nkbeeching (talk) 12:31, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

thanks again for the help.

ill keep that in mind also its a different history line and the english had been at war with spain already and the been supporting the dutch much more then OTL, well either way im  going to see what changes i do, this case it is more of the queen of the lowlands marrying into the tudor family which was similar to what happened in spain OTL and what happened with Nurgundy, it is still an independent state but under the tudor crown, ill still look things over either way but still thanks for the help one way or another, much appriciated

alright i made the aztec ramnents collapse soon after the reformation process began and it has been absorbed into the spanish empire.. where else can i adjust the tl to avoid ASB status. Nkbeeching (talk) 20:00, June 25, 2013 (UTC)

kk thanks again for the help, but what if put in already is plausible?

Account-Email Connection
Hello Lordganon, this is Hlanus. I seem to be having some problems with my email address, because I am not getting any emails on changes to my pages anymore. Just today, Ninjavswarriors edited one of my pages, but nothing showed up on my email account. I am asking you because I do not want this to happen again. Could it be that the wiki forgot my email address? Unlikely, but it is the only thing I can think of. Please answer back as soon as possible. Hlanus (talk) 01:06, June 13, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

So I guess I just have to live with it I suppose. Hlanus (talk) 15:45, June 13, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Hello again. Just so you know, I had some security issues a short while ago, and I am changing all my passwords and my email links. I want to change my email address on my wiki account here because I will soon be closing the email account that corresponds to it, but I am not sure if that is an option. My main concern is that I will lose my account here if I close the email account without changing my wiki account. Please answer back as soon as possible. Thanks for your time. Hlanus (talk) 04:13, June 22, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

Thanks for your help. Have a good weekend. Hlanus (talk) 17:24, June 22, 2013 (UTC)Hlanus

International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent
Hey! Why'd you undo all of my work? I spent a couple hours on that, and you just undid it? Why don't you let me do what I am panning on doing? I am gonna redo that page, the MediFleet page, and the International Health Organization page, then ask for their approval. Reximus55 (talk) 12:04, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

So, can you put it back? And also, how do you know anything about any of those organizations when they are all 3 paragraphs tops. Just put my stuff in, please? I really would like to add that to my list of what I can show I have done. I think my IFRC is a pretty neat thing. Don't you? Reximus55 (talk) 12:18, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

Can you ask the community if they are ok with it? What does this contradict? I will solve it. Reximus55 (talk) 12:21, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

Dear Lordganon
I noticed you deleted a few of my pages for Battle for Earth: Prime, despite me writing on the talk pages that they were temporary, and more content would be added later.

Please stop deleting pages that are necessary to this timeline. If you must keep deleting my pages at least explain why. Mscoree (talk) 20:59, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

In that case, what do I do instead? As it turns out I wouldn't have had to make a redirect if you had deleted the pages I actually marked for deletion. Mscoree (talk) 13:08, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

Okay I don't know if you're trolling me, but you don't see anything marked for deletion because you deleted it. Mscoree (talk) 13:41, June 20, 2013 (UTC)

Now you've deleted both pages, and the content on them. Do you at least have the decency to warn me before deleting a page I worked hard on? Mscoree (talk) 13:39, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

Now what am I supposed to do to prevent you from deleting it this time? Mscoree (talk) 13:43, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

And you deleted the pages again. For the record thanks for being the most unhelpful administrator on this site. I still don't know how to fix this, and I'm going to keep creating the pages until you actually care to answer my questions. Mscoree (talk) 23:24, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Deletion
Hello, recently you deleated my UR Hegemony template? Could you please recover that for me. It was a work in progress, and while similar to the URNotLAH template I use now, was to be used on other nations that the UR influences and has control over in NotLAH. Thanks for your help. G greg e (talk) 14:05, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

Please respond and restore it when you get a chance. Thanks. G greg e (talk) 02:42, June 20, 2013 (UTC)

Query
I am admin on another site, and was wondering how you check IP addresses, because I want to check someones Local (talk)

Hi, I tried that, and got confused, I was wondering if you could be kind enough to ask them to check the IPs of 'Emperor Romanus' and 'Aragorn61' please Local (talk)

RE: your message
'''Sigh... Really LG you put THAT in,? tsk,tsk'''

LG,  you put the correction back in without talking to ANYONE. Something I DID do.

i asked South if he intended to spell it that way after posting a link showing  EoGuy's edit. i mean realy this WAS a MINOR issue between editors, one of which happened to be an admin, it did not require YOU gitting invloved. but i am sure YOU will dissagree, let me correct that i KNOW you wiill so you can save your time on that point.

I thought wikia ( and this one in particulier) has an assume good fath policy? By the tone of the comment's  you left on my page you must have chose to set aside this policy. what i realy want to say, could you have not just asked what's going on first?i mean realy you know if the issue HAD been bad enough i would have came to YOU, i mean come on they was no need for the tone you took with me.

Wingman1 14:58, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

thanks for the advice Sameva555 (talk) 08:11, June 23, 2013 (UTC)

I'm having some template troubles. Ever since I came to Wikia, I've been wondering how to create my own templates for country infoboxes, instead of having to copy of other people's or using the one provided by the Wikia itself. How do you create your own template first of all? When writing articles about wars, I want to make my infobox look grey with the text in black, just like they appear on Wikipedia not a blue box with white text. I'd like some help. FilipinoMan (talk) 09:29, June 23, 2013 (UTC)FilipinoMan

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (Nuclear Power Plant)
LG, since I am from NE PA, and about 25 miles from Susquehanna Nuclear Power Plant, could I do an article on the fate of this facility. It is about 35-40 miles from Wilkes-Barre. I think it would be interesting, considering it probably would have survived, being commissioned 1 year before the POD. Daeseunglim (talk) 01:53, June 25, 2013 (UTC)

Another point is, right now PPL has 2 nuclear reactors there on site. On September 26, 1983 there was only 1 reactor in use. The other was commissioned on June 27, 1984. The first was activated on November 12, 1982. Thanks! Oh yah, so I don't mess it up, I name it: Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (Doomsday: 1983)? Daeseunglim (talk) 12:22, June 27, 2013 (UTC)

Technical Question
Hello LG,

I've been thinking about this for a while now and, having not found a solution, I'm wondering if you may have one.

In my nation pages for my TL, I have put in the Nation infobox and filled in. However, no matter what I put into the "HOS title" section, it always ends up as a hyperlink to "List of Xs of Y land". For example, in my French Empire page, when I put "Emperor" in the appropriate section, it always ends up as a hyperlink to "List of Emperors of the French Empire (page does not exist)". I have already made a page which I would like the word "Emperor" in the infobox to link to, but no matter what I try it does not work.

Do you have any idea how I could make a link that worked? Links in other sections of the infobox work (like in the Organisations section), is this particular section special?

Thanks, Callumthered (talk) 12:18, June 25, 2013 (UTC)

It worked! Thank you very much for solving my minor quandary, it's been nagging me ever since I made my first Nation infobox. Callumthered (talk) 08:28, July 1, 2013 (UTC)

CSA
There is a storey on this wiki in which the CSA wins the civel war because the British help them.it lead to tho americas the USA and the CSA.there are both invloved in the world wars However the CS loses ww1.And somwone like hitler takes power in te CSA and starts ww2.do you know what storey this is.can you find it forme please.

RA question
Hope you have been doing well. Not quite sure whether it is going to happen or not, but I have been getting interested in Russian America again. While I have had this question on my mind for months now, I feel I wanted to get your honest opinion on it, because I have been questioning the timeline for a while.

From what you have read and helped out on, do you thin this timeline is ASB or implausible? After learning more topics and viewpoints for 13 Fallen Stars, I have been questioning the timeline a little bit, but I am not quite sure if it is really implausible or me just nitpicking. I would love to just get some reassurance on this, but given that you have helped out so much and not questioned anything about the POD or such, I hope I am nitpicking. I know this sounds stupid, but I had to ask. So please forgive me for this.

Off topic, I noticed that I am no longer alone in the nuclear plant articles in Doomsday. I know it is early, but I wanted to know if it would be alright to create a nuclear power category once this page is canonized. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:10, July 3, 2013 (UTC)


 * Glad to hear it. But given the new insights I have learned, I do think I am going to have to do a major overhaul to the timeline (which I look forward to). I have a few ideas I may look into, and a few pages to correct. But I will get to all of that at some point, and I look forward to your opinions on a couple of them.


 * Nice to know. How would "Category:Nuclear power (1983: Doomsday)" sound? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:18, July 3, 2013 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, Lordganon, you are quite the most skilfull writer here, so I would like your opinion on my timeline. Yesterday I noticed that some other user has left a message some time ago on the talk page of the main Great Empires page. He wrote something like "Imperialism wank", which I don't really understand. The meaning of that word is according to wiktionary something that has nothing to do with history or "rubbish, nonsense, bad things". I hope he doesn't mean that. And why is my timeline exactly ASB? Does this mean my timeline does not qualify for eventual future featured timeline nomination? And why is my timeline biased?

Biased?
In my timeline many countries are monarchies, however only 20 (out of ± 50 nations in total, some forgotten to list in the list of nations) are empires (2 of those are caliphates, not real empires and some of those empires are constitutional, not absolute), the rest are kingdoms and republics. There are timelines where half of the nations are empires, I think one of those (or more) are featured and have as many empires (in percent) as my timeline. I hope you understand me, cause I really don't see a reason to continue putting effort in this timeline, if it is not considered eligible to be featured in the future.

Good evening,

I saw this website and I am glad to be on it. I have been working on building cities on Minecraft and thought I would use this page to create a backstory for them. This is now the second time (I presume) you have tried to take my progress off of the site, and I ask that you stop. I am an incredibly busy man- preparing for my upcoming semester while working an overnight shift among other things, and what little time I have left to spare I like to let my imagination roam free. Because I have such little time, I cannot possibly spend every waking moment trying to keep my work as perfect as possible, which is what I am currently being accused of. I will do my best to ensure I am not tainting the image of this site, but please understand that I am just an amateur trying to find a release for my vivid imagination. Since this is a page devoted to the concept of "what if", I ask that you stop trying to purge my creativity. Cheers.

Leckband (talk) 07:06, July 4, 2013 (UTC)

Timeline abandoned
Sorry, but if my timeline isn't plausible and has no chance at being featured, I'm not motivated and do not want to continue further. I believed that my timeline was plausible, but you didn't, and who am I to challenge you? That was my main objective, but it seems I'm just a bad writer, so I officially abandon my timeline and put it up for eventual adoption. Feel free to do with it what you want. You won't hear anything from me anymore.

I am serious, I'm not overreacting, I hoped since I joined this site, that one day my timeline would be featured, but it will stay a dream. I'm literally almost crying in reality out of sadness.

Hi there,

You've nominated my page on the 1968 election for deletion conditional upon my not satisfying the "required quality demands." Needless to say, I haven't yet had the time to fully flesh out the presidential timeline I'm envisaging, but would you give some substantive indication of what you mean by this?

My thanks.

HJColeman (talk) 10:38, July 4, 2013 (UTC)

RE: ASB - Map Games
Well, I stand corrected. Sorry for the mix-up there.

Monster Pumpkin (talk) 13:47, July 4, 2013 (UTC)

Overreacting?
So I'm overreacting? You are not the one who had a dream that was suddenly destroyed by someone who claims your timeline is "implausible". I have spent hundreds of hours on this timeline and then you come and say: "Your timeline is implausible because there are too many surviving historical states, period, end of discussion". Boom! Dream destroyed! Think twice before you say something, I still believe that my timeline is plausible, but you don't, and I'm not going to argue with you because I'll lose anyway, you are in charge here. The only reason I joined this site was to make a timeline which would be featured sometime in the future, but if you won't let it happen, I see  NO  reason to continue writing hopeless texts which no one ever reads or considers "plausible". I'm pouring my heart out here right now, who do you think you are to say I'm overreacting? The last time I checked I was still myself and you were someone else. By the way not all states survived, many were destroyed and there are states that are mostly or complete the same in OTL as in my timeline, not that it is of any importance to you.

Expanding Pro Wrestling (1983: Doomsday)?
Hey LordGanon I've been  would it be possible if I could expand on the Pro Wrestling section of 1983: Doomsday? I have plenty of knowledge on Wrestling and Wrestlers. Thank ou for reading my comment.

LightningLynx89 (talk) 03:45, July 7, 2013 (UTC)

Alternate History Memes??
Hey LG, I would like to get your opinion on a new "project" that OreoToast555 and Mscoree are working on. It's called "Alternate History Memes", and I'm not sure what to make of it. Personally, it looks like a waste of space and I think it should be removed. I have already made a discussion about it, but and I would love to get your mediation on it. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 04:33, July 8, 2013 (UTC)

Just letting you know that Mscoree two unflattering uploads, as well as ignore a simple request. I blocked him for three days, but you are more than welcome to extend it. -- NuclearVacuum ( Talk ) 05:09, July 8, 2013 (UTC)

I have no idea why he has done this, but Imperium Guy altered the block I gave to Mscoree. Didn't you tell me this was not allowed? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:48, July 8, 2013 (UTC)

--
Can you give me a link to sites in which i can create my own maps.luke  perry

RT II
Out of interest why is RT II labelled as Alien Space Bats? just in case there's some way I can get it away from that label. Kunarian TALK 12:40, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

I was hoping for something a little more detailed but okay, if that's how you feel. Kunarian TALK 14:02, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

Just out of interest, why did you remove 'for god and for glory'? It is a map game, and it isn't dead. Is there a rule I am missing, or is there a certain restriction on Roman/number of map games? Mafia (talk)

Coming back to this, more of what I was asking is was more of some ideas about how to have a world which is: largely decimated by nuclear war (or something else that's quite destructive), maybe lost some technologies (not vital) have a bit of time for that to fade and for new nations to form. A bit like Doomsday but maybe able to have more years before the present, but this isn't necessary.

I had (obvious) thoughts about it relating to a war that had gone too far, however I did want to know if you had any ideas. Kunarian TALK 10:38, July 17, 2013 (UTC)

Hey
Hey man. What's up? Look, I know you are probably feeling very very annoying with all this Mscoree thing going on, but I need to talk to you about this.

A couple years back, you too were a new editor. You too had the wiki rules to learn. Now, you instantly became a fan of Doomsday: 1983, and the users respected it. You are one of the older on the wiki - and quickly adapted. Taking a great interest, you asked questions - to Mitro, Ben, South, the lot. Now, they were all fairly nice and talked to you. It did help that you had the history background most of us lack.

You contributed well, and rose through the ranks of the TSPTF. Since then, the mass categorisation of pictures and timelines seen on this wiki (lacking on most other ones) can all be said to be due to partially (hell, almost completely) you. You helped other users and told new timeline writers what their shortcoming was.

And then I arrived. I do still remember that argument on the India page of Doomsday. Its that argument I owe my ability to edit the UIP page with you. That is beside the point. The point is, I was a person who bugged you to the absolute core. And you kinda got annoyed with me. So annoyed, that South had to pop in and tell you that you should try to be more kinder to newer users. And you were fine for a while after that.

Yet overtime, as things progressed and the number of active admins decreased - more and mroe of the workload fell upon you. This had the effect of shortening your "kindness span". You got more aggressive as your arguments with users went on. True, they were probably not the easiest to get the point across, but rather than trying to sort it out by trying to be nice - you started to write paragraphs about how the user was wrong due to his opinion.

Another person that started off like me was Guns. It took a lot of time for you to trust him after he too argued with you a lot. True, he was the usual type of editor - the one who'll bug you with what he thinks is right (me XD) at the start when he joins, but it kept on getting more aggressive than it needed to be. Maybe, in situations like these, you should call upon other editors to explain your point - because if you are correct, then you should not worry that you need to keep on arguing your point. As many voices become one collective one.

Moving on to the recent Mscoree thing. Now, this has taken a lot out of us all. I have been criticised by Nuke and you for my actions, for which the only defence I post is I did what I thought was correct. Earlier on than this, you had a thing with him about redirecting broken links and the likes. This is where a third view would have been beneficial. We would have not had Ms blocked. Look, he is new(ish) to the wiki - and a simple template problem should not have reuslted in a ban. You did try to tell him, but all an observer can see is highlighted words.

Therefore, all I advise you to do is try to be nicer to new users, try to get other users to try to help you get your point across, rather than making it look like you are being an aggressor. We know you are trying to look out for the wiki, but in the process you end up annoying many users. Small things like trying to dumb down what you are trying to say, or explaining in slight detail the point you are trying to make (which you do well, so its mainly the dumbing down, lol).

Please, try to do so. I am a user who admires you highly, but I do also think that there are aspects that you can change so this is a nicer environment for new editors. Thanking you,  Imp (Say Hi?!) 23:48, July 12, 2013 (UTC)

Königsberg
I am just letting you know that I came across Category:Königsberg and felt that the material should be included in Category:Kaliningrad because the only difference was the name (no other categories seem to follow this).

I was just about to delete the category when I realized that I previously attempted to do this, and you reverted it all on me. I honestly forgot I did this (and it was exactly a year ago). Rather than start an issue (like Micronesia), I am letting you know what I have done, if you continue to insist on two categories then I will revert what I have done on my own. But I will leave it as is on the grounds you may have changed your mind. If you have, you are welcome to delete the category. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 19:34, July 14, 2013 (UTC)

Charlemagne and Irene
I found something interesting the other day; Charlemagne almost married Irene of Athens, which would have politically fused the HRE and Byzantine Empire together. When I do timelines, I try to do things that are original and I'm not sure if people make ATLs about this a lot. Have you seen a lot of timelines with Charlemagne and Irene getting married? CrimsonAssassin- "You can't handle this egg roll" 00:18, July 17, 2013 (UTC)

Looks like it's time to crank out the timeline. Thank you! CrimsonAssassin- "You can't handle this egg roll" 01:08, July 18, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Macedonia in New Union
How did you even come across it? I purposely hid it because I wasn't ready to discuss it, and I completely forgot about it because of other edits. Can't lie, I am impressed.

You can probably guess that I am not happy about the answer (especially since Yugoslavia has gone through multiple changes to only have it turn into OTL, more or less), but I can't argue with the facts. But there is little I am going to do about it as of now, I will wait until I get back into the timeline to correct anything (the whole page needs to be redone anyway). But I thank you for you help in the matter.

I will also be giving you a heads up, I have a potential change for Russian America in mind that would be pretty big, but I believe it would be possible given the situation of the timeline and geography involved. I will bring it up with you later on, but I am just letting you know that something is coming.

Also once again, I do apologize for the Königsberg-think (I truly forgot about it). I will revert it in a while. I know you just said otherwise, but maybe making a new category called "Königsberg-Kaliningrad" might be an interesting alternative. But you would be right on that they might a well be two different cities. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:28, July 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * No need to worry. If anything, I am more surprised that you not only watch my sandbox, but also check all revisions. If anything, I am honored. But I will also keep it in mind for the future.


 * Like I said before, I will work on Macedonia later on, especially because that page needs to be cleaned-up big time (I think there is still elements of when Srpska was canonized as part of Yugoslavia). Though the only thing that rubs me the wrong way is that you stated that Macedonian was only part of Serbia for a few years before WWI. However, they were a part of Serbia much longer than either Montenegro or Vojvodina. While this changes nothing, it just seems... odd.


 * Not sure when I will bring it up, but probably in a few days. I look forward to your response on it.


 * Well what's done is done, I will try not to forget this time. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:07, July 18, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Pressure
It's not that big of a deal, i've been considering nixed ideas for my own mapgame, i was told that it wasn't "Alternate History", of which i agree with. OreoToast555(Talk)(Sandbox) 16:52, July 17, 2013 (UTC)

Not so Goode
There's a user called Dave Goode who's made a new TL called JFK Survives...except he hasn't made a portal page, and has added some people who died pre POD...

On the other hand, I just talked to him and he said he wanted to make parody pages, just calling them JFK survives to make sure he knew they were his. I told him to make blogs for his parodies.

Right, I know. I contacted you directly after him, so hadn't his reply yet.

Spam
When I left the messages, I didn't really consider them as spam. I only contacted people who had expressed an interest in the idea, barring Chris and Nuke. I contacted Chris and Nuke because someone mentioned they might be interested. Chris was, and I already saw that Nuke labeled it as spam. Sorry, won't happen again. CourageousLife (talk) 05:00, July 19, 2013 (UTC)

Template:Infobox former country problems
Hello, I am creating a new article Aswad Sultanate. Here's a problem, whenever I ender a person's name under the leader1 box, and then the years of reign in the leader 1 years, it's okay and does as it should. When it do it to leader2 and leader 2 years, it distorts it.

Anybody beyond leader #1's name appears right under the first leader's years of reign, and appears like this:  - style="padding-left:0;text-align:left;"|2013 (claimant) on the infobox. Why's it doing this?

FilipinoMan (talk) 07:37, July 19, 2013 (UTC)FilipinoMan

OOC?
Just curious - what does OOC stand for?

EoGuy (talk) 11:23, July 19, 2013 (UTC)

Hello again
After some time to meditate, to rest, to think, to accept and to let go I have decided to return to the wiki. I will continue to work on and improve my timeline, regardless of if my timeline will ever achieve featured status. I may also have acted rude, so I apologize for that. But I will try to convince you and prove that my timeline is plausible and unbiased. When I created this timeline I surely didn't intend to favor any side, just to create an interesting and plausible timeline. I will try to explain.

States that both exist in RL and my timeline
This states are nations that exist both in real life and my universe, they are completely or largely the same
 * Canada (republic in my timeline, mostly the same)
 * United States of America (the same with the exception of some no existant states occupied by Native America)
 * Venezuala (the same, but also includes Guyana, Suriname and French Guiana)
 * Argentina (completely the same, no changes)
 * South Africa (the same but includes Namibia, Lesotho and Swaziland)
 * Botswana (no changes here)
 * Zimbabwe (same as above)
 * Mozambique (same as above)
 * Central African Republic (same but includes Cameroon)
 * Somalia (the same)
 * Morocco (mostly the same, same ruling house, still a monarchy but also includes parts of Algeria)
 * Spain (the same)
 * France (the same)
 * San Marino (the same)
 * Monaco (the same)
 * Netherlands (the same)
 * United Kingdom (the same but includes Ireland)
 * Denmark (same heads of state, still a monarchy but the union with Norway was never dissolved)
 * Sweden (never lost Finland to Russia, otherwise the same)
 * Bhutan (still a monarchy, though it is now an empire and is much larger)
 * Japan (mostly the same, but different head of state)
 * Australia (mostly the same, but a republic)

Historical states that existed in RL that survived in my timeline

 * Aztec Empire (defeated the Spanish)
 * Inca Empire (defeated the Spanish)
 * Empire of Brazil (instituted reforms and empire survived, albeit as a constitutional monarchy)
 * Kingdom of Kongo (resited the attempted Portuguese colonization)
 * Songhai Empire (defeated the Moroccans at the battle of Tondibi and resisted colonization)
 * Madagascar (was still colonized by France but later declared independence as a kingdom)
 * Abbasid Caliphate (successfully survived and did not crumble, defeated the Mongols at Baghdad)
 * Persia (was still destroyed but later declared independence)
 * Portugal (survived as a kingdom by democratizing)
 * Holy Roman Empire (was still defeated by Napoleon, but was restored afterwards)
 * Poland-Lithuania (survived Russian and Holy Roman attacks with the help of Rome and Sweden)
 * Roman Empire (the western empire was still destroyed in 476, the eastern in 1188, replaced by the Georgian Empire, but consequently renamed as the and deemed as the successor of the Roman Empire)
 * Russian Empire (Tsar Nicholas II wasn't assassinated but due to the people's hatred for him, his daughter Anastasia became Tsarina and reformed Russia)
 * Mongol Empire (survived, but weakened over the course of history)
 * India (Maurya Empire did still collapse, but empire was re-established following the overthrow of the Mughal Empire)
 * Singhala (resisted Portuguese colonization following a strong kingdom established by King Parakramabahu I)
 * Tibet (established dominance over Tibet and Central Asia and defeated China, surviving until today)
 * China (original empire was destroyed by the Mongols but was re-established in 1961)
 * Korea (resisted attempted Japanese invasion)
 * Burma (was destroyed but later re-established)
 * Khmer Empire (dominated Mainland Southeast Asia and resisted colonization)
 * Nusantara (dominated Maritime Southeast Asia and resisted colonization)

States that never existed in RL or whose existence is controversial
As you can see (if I'm not mistaken), there are exactly 22 states that exist in both RL and this timeline, 22 historical states that survived and 8 states that never existed in RL but do in this timeline. I think there is an equal distribution, sure there are quite some surviving states, but I'm sure there are some featured timelines that have a comparable division like here. I hope this is enough for you to deem my timeline as plausible and unbiased. I surely did not intend to favor any side, and I do not favor any side, this is the truth, regardless if you believe it or not. Friendly greetings, Civciv5.Civciv5 (talk) 14:10, July 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Caribbean (confederation of autonomous nations)
 * Native American Federation (formed in the 17th century to defeat the European invaders)
 * Flanders (never formally a unified nation, but became one in 2013 by declaring independence from the Netherlands)
 * Kitara Empire (went on to create a centralized empire and resisted colonization with the help of Kenopia)
 * Kenopia (formed by Shajar al-Durr in the 13th century and claims to be the true caliphate)
 * Lyrobia (break-away state from Morocco formed in the late 18th century)
 * Maya Kingdom (kingdom formed by King Pacal II, defeated the Spanish)
 * Oceanian Empire (originally founded by King Kamehameha I, resisted colonization)

Kaiser age.
i wish this had what ww2 would have been.have you read this storey.

Show/Hide Code
Hello,

I was wondering if you could explain to me on how to implement show/hide code, specifically in a template. If it is not on this wikia, can we begin steps to implement it if it is not difficult to add to the common code file?

Best Regards and thanks for your time and dedication, G greg e (talk) 08:11, July 21, 2013 (UTC)

I am looking to create a collopsable template/navbox, as seen here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NavFrame or here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Collapsible_tables

Thanks for any help you can give,

G greg e (talk) 08:30, July 21, 2013 (UTC)

ASB? OK. But biased...
So I can understand why you believe that it could be ASB. But biased? There is at least one featured timeline which is ASB, so I will accept that because I presume that's not an obstacle to achieve my goal of featured status. (Or is it?) However, the word "biased" is. But you didn't say the word "biased" in your last message, did you? Which states do you actually think that can't exist together in one timeline? Aztec+Maya? China+Tibet? Others? Also which states do you believe had zero chance to survive until present day? Native Americans? Holy Romans? Arabia? Others? Please tell me cause I will do whatever it takes to convince you that my timeline is "unbiased" if you still believe that it is "biased". Kind regards, Civciv5. Civciv5 (talk) 10:41, July 21, 2013 (UTC)

Cracow
Can you please give me some guidance about how to improve the Cracow GDL Article please? -- 92.13.88.215 10:43, July 21, 2013 (UTC)

Biased #2
But which? Which countries do you consider "implausibly large"? That isn't really a valid argument cause in this featured timeline both the Roman and Mongol Empires are ridiculously large each covering almost 25% of the total land area of the world, which is much larger than even the largest state, Russia in my timeline. I'm confident there are also large empires in other timelines. Also which countries do you think could not survive together or survive at all? Please list them, as I will  not  rest until you consider my timeline plausible and unbiased. I can explain everything and already have a vague explanation for most of the nations in my timeline, some nations in my timeline already have an explanation written in their "history" section. Eventually a will write one for all of them. Also I don't think any nation does have "no chance" to survive, it would be a little sad that nobody would use them in timelines then. When you list the nations you consider that cannot survive with another nation or survive at all, please also provide an explanation. Please don't say your decision is definite and there's no point in any further discussion. I have learned we must learn to be open, please give me and my timeline a chance. Civciv5 (talk) 13:15, July 21, 2013 (UTC)

Community Messages
Do I have permission to edit community messages? Imp (Say Hi?!) 17:38, July 21, 2013 (UTC)

Nothing much, just telling users to check out the Map Contest. It really is a great thing. Don't suppose you would like to get involved too? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 19:24, July 24, 2013 (UTC)

defeating britain andamerican post way situation
2 questions

to successfully beat britain it would have been necesary to cut there access to South america, south africa and the Suez right, to starvve them out?

and second what sort of post war gains woul the states look for, i thought abut them taking away France and Britains colonies in the central america, while breaking canada into Quebec and a republic in canada does this seem good.? Nkbeeching (talk) 15:24, July 22, 2013 (UTC)

That big idea that I hope will work out
As promised, here is my new idea for Russian America. I believe it should work, the geography and politics are there.

But before we discuss this, I just wish to refresh the situation that the Canadian Rebellions of 1837 are successful in ATL, with Upper Canada gaining statehood into the United States and Lower Canada gaining independence. I bring this up so as to avoid a repeat of what happened in 13 Fallen Stars or lead to another canonization being outdated. But if my memory serves me right, you gave me pointers on where the capitals of my two Upper Canadian states should be (so knowing you, you wouldn't have done this had you not found it workable).

Now for my big idea. Not sure the best way to express it, so I guess simple is better. In short, I wish to remove Borealia as an independent nation and instead have it incorporated into the United States (by means of peaceful purchase in the mid to late 19th Century).

Allow me to elaborate. While doing some research on the Canadian Rebellions, I came across a comment stating (to the affect) that with the Canadas gone, the UK might as well sell their claims (being the North-West Territory and Rupert's Land) to the United States. Without the Canadas, affective connection with the interior would be gone and the existing population was mostly natives and a few fur trappers. In short, the Brits would consider the region in a similar manner that the Russians saw Alaska OTL (that being it was too costly to keep a territory of very little gain), and sell it off before they potentially loose it in a future conflict that gives them no compensation.

The POD I have at the present would follow something like this: with the Canada's gaining independence (and with Upper Canada being incorporated into the US), tensions with the British become even more strained from OTL. With the outbreak of the Civil War, the British are more inclined to help out the Confederate cause a little more than OTL. All out support (troop deployment and recognition) is avoided for several reasons: including decreased need for Southern cotton (as Egypt and India were quickly becoming alternatives), growing pressure on helping a nation who would preserve slavery, but most importantly the threat that Russia, Mexico, and Canada (Quebec) would likely side with the US in an all out war. In affect, there was very little gain for the UK to completely side with the Confederates, but that didn't stop them from aiding them in many ways similar to OTL. (If I am way off, or I am overestimating, I do apologize and you can ignore this section).

With a Union victory comes further tensions with the British (as OTL). The Americans demand reparations from the British, and much like OTL the US would accept land. With it already being canonized that Columbia is sold to Russia, combined with growing costs and limited population, there should be more incentive for the British to agree to a compromise in which they sell the territory (probably in exchange for leaving Acadia and the Caribbean alone). Though if this particular POD isn't workable, than I am open to any alternatives.

This is my idea in a nutshell. I do believe it is workable, but I have looked at alternatives to check to see if I am not simply sugar coating the situation. If the British keep the territory (due to pride and snubbing the Americans [which wouldn't sound farfetched), it would be costly to keep it organized and protected with such few people at the time. With [British] Columbia and the Canadas gone, the only means of access (without buttering up to the Americans) would be Hudson Bay (though I think it is not overly reliable [especially since their is no large population around it OTL]). Railroads could be possible to keep the interior under Brisih control, though creating such a vast project for very little initial pay may not be worth it to the contemporaries. And with dissidents already existing within the territory (most notably the Metis), it seems like a lot of work that the Brits may be willing to let go.

I also know that you are Albertan, so forgive me if I have said something hurtful or if this idea doesn't gain your personal support. But that is pretty much it. It would change many aspects to the timeline. There are a lot of parameters that I wanted to check first, which is why I delayed bringing it up. But now that I am mentally canonizing this idea, I better bring it for a second opinion before it gets harder to un-canonize it in the event it is wrong. So I do hope this will work out. I look forward to your response. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 00:57, July 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * So it will not work. If at all possible, could there be any way to have such a scenario work? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:59, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

Can't say that I am happy at another idea going nowhere. But thank you for your help. May I also make a request for the future. While you comment about glaciers was helpful, I would appreciate it if you would keep on topic when it involves an unworkable idea. While this one wasn't bad in any way, it only reminded me of times in which this was the case. I know you are only trying to help and I thank you for that, but to me that would only add insult to injury. But either way, thank you again, not sure what I am going to do now. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 18:36, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

Cross-wiki banning?
Hi, I was on chat, and someone asked if, because I am admin on Map Games Wiki, and someone vandalised the pages there, it would be possible to have a system where if someone is banned for vandalism or something on there, they are banned on here as well, and vice versa I guess. I just thought I might ask if it was possible to set that up, and if it is feasable Mafia (talk)

Old Baby 2
Old baby 2 nomiated a page of mine for delecton and that was perfectly functioning for delition. He also deledted the wjole content. Can you revert the edit. Link Octivian Marius (talk) 22:11, July 23, 2013 (UTC)

Hey, you did something to my PMII page (Brythonic Language). Why? Also can we revisit the Red Cross article, and you tell me what conflicts with canon so I may fix that? Finally, why would you advise against me being able to help with the Rise of Babel TL?

It's me again
You don't realize that it's NOT the "ASB" thing that annoys me, but the "biased" thing, I will do everything that is in my power to achieve the removal of the biased. Now I will try to prove that you are mistaken about thinking that the nations you listed are indeed possible to exist like they do in my timeline. So I can live the ASB thing, but NOT with the biased thing, I will continue discussing with you until the day that you remove that biased thing as I can't remove it myself (you could ban me!). I will not give up one my dream, I will get what I want, I may seem a bit annoyed and I am. But please do not be angry, I will accept the ASB thing, because that does not disqualifies my timeline for future featured status, but the biased does. If it DOES make my timeline ineligible, I will also contest that. This discussion is getting long, maybe we can discuss this somewhere else?
 * Bhutan: It might seem very large, but Bhutan was much larger in the past, got it from wikipedia see the Kingdom of Barantola part with the map, without the Qing dominance, which Tibet countered, Bhutan didn't lost these territories to other nations
 * Tibet was much larger in the past, also in real life
 * There is a featured timeline where the Aztec and Inca empires both do exist, I don't see why that wouldn't be possible in my timeline, if their foolish leaders Atahualpa and Montezuma II had not welcomed that Spanish as guests the Spanish could have been defeated and they could have modernized
 * As you live in the United States, you may be right, (Manifest Destiny), but I still deem it possible that the Natives could resist the Europeans if they had unified (20 million Natives vs less than 1 million Europeans or nut much more than that) Canada isn't part of the USA, so why can't another nation exist outside the USA in North America?
 * HRE? P-L Commonwealth? Why not? They were still conquered by Napoleon, but later re-established.
 * The Mongol Empire was very strong and even weakened was still a threat, I could see them surviving in a weakened state.
 * Why do you think both the Roman Empire and the Caliphates could not survive like that? With the Mongols meeting both a Roman and Arabian Empire could mean that they have to split their forces instead of focusing on Baghdad. Kenopia has no neighbours and has a high population and controls Ethiopia, Sudan and Egypt, Europeans may think twice before they attack a large nation with a high population.
 * If the Songhai Empire had defeated Morocco at the Battle of Tondibi, they could have learned the secret of gunpowder and with that + their large population they could have defeated the Europeans
 * Same with the others, they could have modernized, if you say Ethiopia was the only one that could survive, Africa would look quite boring in many timelines

Please explain how it is against canon so I may fix it. Since Geneva was spared, the original Red Cross would still exits. <span style="border:3px solid blue; "> <font color="#FF0000" face="Sans-Serif" title="Reximus">Reximus   <font color="#FF0000" face="Sans-Serif" title="Talk">Maximus  10:54, July 27, 2013 (UTC)

You win
You kind of destroyed my last hope to ever see my timeline featured, which still makes me sad. Sometimes I think your views are Eurocentric, but I'm not going to argue anymore. Well I don't know what to do right now, I'm kinda confused. Should I abandon this timeline and start a complete new one where everything is the same except one nation which is European and because you think that would be the only way that a timeline is plausible, which would be incredibly boring and Eurocentric? No, that goes against all my beliefs. While you believe that my timeline is biased, I do not and I will never do. Well, it seems this may be the end for me, I'm not angry, just... sad...what is my goal even if I continue improving my timeline? Where am I going cause you will never deem my timeline eligible for featured status. There isn't even a category like "best timelines"? Only featured... I will never get any kind of recognition even if I have written thousand articles with enormous texts...Well, I don't know what to do right now, I may return or may not or occasionally edit some article, we will see what the future brings. Note:Please do not see this as insulting, I'm just very sad right now.Civciv5 (talk) 18:00, July 27, 2013 (UTC)

Featured timelines removal
As you said, the Aztec, Maya and Inca civilizations could impossibly survive, all timelines in which one of these or more of them survives, cannot be featured and should receive the same treatment as my timeline.

These featured timelines include at least the survival of one of them beyond Spanish conquest in OTL: Also the Alternative History:List of Althists page isn't up to date, Papatlaca and Quetzalcoatl's World should be removed as they are no longer featured. I'm looking forward to the removal of these timelines as featured, as they should not receive special treatment.Civciv5 (talk) 07:51, July 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Vegetarian World
 * Chaos
 * Aztec Empire
 * Ætas ab Brian
 * Cabotia and Brasil
 * Superpowers

Chat Moderation
I was just wondering where i would go or who I would ask if I may join the wiki in chat moderation? OreoToast555(Talk)(Sandbox) 03:24, July 29, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, alright  OreoToast555(Talk)(Sandbox) 18:23, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

Conventions
Can I add a part to the conventions in use in this wiki that states you shouldn't give out map game invites? Many users do this to advertise their map game because they don't know it's spam. PitaKang- My Life for Aiur! En Taro Tassadar 14:56, July 30, 2013 (UTC)

Friendly reminder that I have started backtracking on the WCRB Newshour Page. If you find anything wrong, feel free to adjust it. Plus, you really need to archive this page, lol. ;D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 13:18, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

The end?
They DO have that content. Also I'm just annoying you because you continue to claim that my timeline is biased and I only write meaningless things. I'm already saying I'm one of the most stubborn and determined persons you will ever meet, I won't give up very easily. I'm also unable to continue my current timeline because I necessarily want to create a future featured timeline. But I'm also unwilling to create a new timeline because I don't want to completely invent a new idea and write countless articles over and over again. Please don't say I should just continue writing regardless of the featured status thingy, I can't help it, it's just who I am and I can't change who I truly am. Please do also not ban me. So I'm currently in an impasse where I will probably remain forever. This may be the end, I may never return, or maybe I will, I just don't know yet... Civciv5 (talk) 10:39, July 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * Vegetarian World has the Inca Empire surviving
 * Chaos has the also the Inca Empire surviving
 * Aetas ab Brian has also Inka Empire surviving
 * Cabotia and Brasil has again the Inca Empire
 * Superpowers has the Mayan civilization and the Inca Empire surviving

Message from TheMaster001
Yeah, couldn't think of better title.

Anyways, I found five articles without timeline in its name: This, this, this, this and this. They have no timeline. What do you want to do with them? -- 17:59, August 1, 2013 (UTC)

P.S.: Sorry if I rushed at ya months ago.

Affiliation with the World War II Wiki
Hello Lordganon,

I would like to propose an affiliation with the World War II Wiki. With both of our wikis being centralized around history,  I believe that sharing affiliation links with each other will be helpful to both wikis with editors visiting and contributing to both projects. Anyway, I look forward to working with you in the future should things proceed. 03:37,8/4/2013 03:37, August 4, 2013 (UTC)

Why did you ban me for three days and remove all the updates I made to my alt history page on world war 2 saying that it was inaccurate!?!?! its an alt history page and it took me ages to write that...

I don't know why you nominated my page for deletion; it follows the timeline of Barack Obama assassinated.

List of Nations category?
I'm merely being curious, so I hope you don't mind me asking why you've removed this category from two of my timelines? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 17:49, August 11, 2013 (UTC)


 * Really? Well... glad I could help out. I too was going to correct it, but it was more on the fact that there were two categories of this. The other is Category:Lists of countries. I was going to get rid of this one and replace it with the one you just deleted. Not sure if you would also like to get rid of this one as well. To be fair, I don't see anything wrong with having such a category that unites all the nations lists on this site. But that's just me. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:02, August 14, 2013 (UTC)

Advice
Hi LG, how are you? I hope fine. Today the blocked User:Owen1983 has arrived to the spanish wikia (even he already began a article), and i want to ask your opinion. In view of his precedents in this wiki, I should block him immediately? Regards and thanks for your help. --Katholico (talk) 03:38, August 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks LG, I guess is Better safe than sorry :) I will block him then. Regards! --Katholico (talk) 19:46, August 15, 2013 (UTC)

Algorithm
What exactly do you want me to fix? There's nothing wrong with the algorithm regarding NATO versus South Africa. Mscoree (talk) 14:35, August 21, 2013 (UTC)

Archive
Time to make one.

Creative spelling
Some of these kids do very creative writing.

Unfortunately, they also do very creative spelling.

Bil

EoGuy (talk) 18:14, August 21, 2013 (UTC)

South Africa
I don't believe you explain how to fix the algorithms, and if you did you weren't clear enough, because I still don't see anything wrong with them. South Africa agreed to the terms and the war is already over. I unfortunately can't revert two years because Imp's big brother told me to. Good luck, Mscoree (talk) 13:27, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

Nope. Mscoree (talk) 13:50, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

Guyanas and the Carribean
agai about my Lusitania Timeline, what would have been the most likely outcome for the newly annexed american territories would the have  eventually become states or remained territories similar to nowadays Puerto Rico.

Nkbeeching (talk) 15:42, August 24, 2013 (UTC)

alright i was planning on doing some changes anyways it was hard for me to understand as well, what rearrangements would you suggest.

I was thinking of creating an autonomous region in the guyanas under American Suzerainty something like the Phillipines before independence, like the British over sea territories which retain domestic autonomy, or based on the cuban model which the USA used in the post Spanish American war.

on another note, which flag would the Germany use its a democratic body for all purposes so i dont know weither or not it would retain the black white and red Flag or adopt a new one.

Nkbeeching (talk) 11:01, August 25, 2013 (UTC)

alright thanks, and last thing is the content any good up till now?

Nkbeeching (talk) 11:28, August 25, 2013 (UTC)

can you help me with South American Rising 2 (Map Game) Warman555 (talk) 13:44, August 27, 2013 (UTC)

Help, please
hey i was wondering could you help me with my info box on this page = http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Nam_Republic_(Age_of_Asia) i cant get some things to show up and i dont know how to put the map in the info box. (You will see the map i want in it below it on the page) hope thats not too much trouble. thanks sincerley

(Masterire (talk) 16:00, August 27, 2013 (UTC))

Re:Ukrainian Alaskan Page
Well given that my Russian isn't as good as I would like it to be, I generally don't hesitate to mess with Russians correcting my grammar. But I do agree that his translation here looked off for me, but didn't wish to bother with it. But it now makes sense why you kept reverting it.

Either way, thank you. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 01:31, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Congratulations
Thanks, LG, I promise I will work hardly and laboriously as the TSPTF member for the betterment of this wiki. But, because I just entered the college yesterday, so, is it okay if I asking a permission from you for me being inactive until Saturday? FirstStooge (talk) 10:41, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

Done. :) FirstStooge (talk) 10:02, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, LG. I will be as responsible as I can be and begin work ASAP.

<span style="-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(#FFFFFF 50%,#FFFFFF 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(#FFD700 50%,#000000 50%));"><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding-bottom:1px;padding-top:1px;-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#1C39BB 45%,#120A8F 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#CCCCFF 45%,#000000 50%));border-top-left-radius:500px 400px;border-bottom-left-radius:500px 400px">               <span style="background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, right top, left top, from(#000000), to(#FFFFFF)); -webkit-border-radius: 36px 12px; -moz-border-radius: 36px / 12px; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 5px #000000; border:2px double #E5E4E2 border-radius:5px; border-bottom-right-radius:100px 90px; border-top-right-radius:100px 90px; color:#FFFFFF"> <font color="#FF033E" face="Courier">"Fear the power   <font color="#FF033E" face="Courier" title="Bvlog"> of the Dark Side of the Force."  16:46, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

just curious as to why the category page, Australian Republic, was deleted?Sameva555 (talk) 15:24, September 6, 2013 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for clearing that upSameva555 (talk) 15:25, September 10, 2013 (UTC)

German population
what would rough statistics of a greater germany's population be. i mean german empire plus austria and south tirol, i cant seem to find the info anywhere and i want to do a calculation for present day greater germany for the timeline, my estimates are somewhere around 90 million or nearly 100 million i dont knw if these numbers are two big.

mhmm okthanks.

oh yeah i forgot, without the whole hitler thing and having remained strong pan germanism would have remained a popular theme in german and austriann politics right? i ask because i made austria part of the german empire bypopular vote based on the continued existence of pan germanism and close relations between Austria and Germany. Nkbeeching (talk) 15:27, September 17, 2013 (UTC)

actually form what ive read there were strong wishes to unite the two during the post first world war, and even befoore then, the reason the greater german solution was abandoned before the war was because of the existance of the austrian empire, and many austrians felt like germans till the end of the second war based on my research. it is possible for it to have existed in the case of a smaller austria, though i was asking to know if it would implausible to unite the two. Nkbeeching (talk) 16:04, September 17, 2013 (UTC)

the reason it fell apart after from what ive been reading is the close attachment between nazism and pan germanism. unfortunately T.T

im talking largley about the german nationalism that existed since the end of the napoleonic wars, it was strong up until the end of ww2. if this is wrong ill see if there i any revisionss needed but i think it is quite plausible with a strong bond between Austria and Germany since is without its massive empire. again thanks for listening to my rambling XD Nkbeeching (talk) 16:19, September 17, 2013 (UTC)

um ok ill keep that in mind for the timeline and do a few ajustments to the timeline during the secod great war forcing a unification. thanks again for the help.Nkbeeching (talk) 17:42, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

i have a different idea and am gonig to be back tracking abit since i had several ideas over the last few days which make more sense for the timeline im eradicating everything ive done past 1946 and  will be revising the second great war since it has a few loose ends i wish to deal with.

an interesting couple of texts i found support what we both say, prior to ww2a large  majority of the austrians did consider themselves germans but with a seperate heritage, and the main issue the had with joining Germany was that theyed be joining a protestant majority state, and might lose their culture, but it was a mainstream topic with different parties having different opnions on the matter though its true that most likely preassure would have been needed t obring the cuntry into the German Empirte or into a federal Germany, but without a major defeat or without the rise of a monster like hitler it would probably go smother and be long lasting

My Timeline
LG. I wanted to discuss a few things with you.

The first is my ban and apology to FS. I have apologized to him and he has (undertandably) chastised me a bit for my behavior, but that is to be expected. I am now going to try realy hard to "turn over a new leaf."

I know we haven't been on the best start, and it appears that I am not your biggest fan, and vice versa. But from now on, I would like to seek your help like many other members of this community do. (This is out of respect for you.)

Now, you may or may not have noticed my TL, 6-2-5 Upheaval. I believe that this is a solid idea, with a solid PoD (historically plausible, mind you) that has the oppurtunity to get MacArthur in the White House, and then make an Asia-centered Cold War.

I was hoping you could look over a few pages of the TL, and tell me what you think. Here is what I had envisioned for the TL in the 1950s- early 60s. LG, do you have any thoughts or ideas? Everything is appreciated!
 * Potential_China_Borders_(6-2-5).png won by USA
 * MacArthur elected by landslide
 * MacArthur Doctrine issued
 * Indochina War goes anti-Commie
 * 2nd Sino-Civil War
 * Division of China
 * Manchuria and Tibet declare independence
 * Mongolia and USSR take advantage and expand
 * RoC left with coast, less land
 * France allows peaceful Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos
 * Without Communist China, democracy is less challenged

Warning Re
Just two question regarding your warning. What does DD mean and what should I put on my blog?Ninjasvswarriors (talk) 13:31, September 17, 2013 (UTC)

Can I make a Chinese version of the wiki?Ninjasvswarriors (talk) 14:02, September 17, 2013 (UTC)

Napoleonic wars
what would have been a part of the war which would have established a balance with napoleon being forced out of eastern europe but with the allies unable to remove him form power, im interested in creating a timeline based on a work ive been doing offline since ive reached something of a writers bloc on my other timelines, its not concrete yet but the basic idea is without the end of napoleon's ambitions and with strong tensions between the different warring parties continues wars between the european powers on the european continent without the balance of power and an increasingly competitive and violent colonization period. Russia, trying to eat away at the ottomans the german powers of Austria and Prussia putting aside their difference for a while to deal with an increasingly aggresive france, and the Americans having to deal with continued Spanish aggression under the napoleonic dynasty in the americas. i dont know if this is possible thats why im asking for some advice. Nkbeeching (talk) 19:07, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

thanks, i wasnt thinking that far east, i was largely thinking at most the rhine confederation, but i like your idea, thanks ill do the necesary fixes later on thanks for the hlp once more Nkbeeching (talk) 16:44, September 19, 2013 (UTC)

my own original idea was prussia joining the third coliation, mhmmm could you pass me a link on the deal its the first time ive heard of it actually, it would be a great help.Nkbeeching (talk) 16:51, September 19, 2013 (UTC)

my idea for the PoD is that The Russians dont fall for the French Roose and retain control of the Pratzen Plateau, due to Mikhail Kutuzuv successfully convincing the Czar not to, this makes the battle indecisive. Seeing the French push not decisive and in a precarious situation Prussia decides to join the Allies against Napoleon using their crossing of Prussian soil as a reason. From there The French would crush the Prussians like OTL but with their position now compromised the Austrian and Russian forces are able to attack them breaking the French hold on Eastern Austria and Vienna. still need to flesh it out completely, but does it sound good?Nkbeeching (talk) 01:00, September 20, 2013 (UTC)

Um ok, i wasnt quite sure how much the battle would have affected, yeah i know the french would have crushed the prussians, they had an outdated army, it was inevitable but what i was thinking was that the fact that neither side has a chance to reorganize and Without such a decisive victory the coliation could react quicker to attack the French pushing them back a bit, thus leading to an earlier end of conflict with France temporarily in control of Western Germany parts Italy and some other areas for the next couple of decades under the bonaparte dynasty. Even if the allies could eventually push back the french they would be tired and overextended and napoleon coud organize a better defence closer to france.my idea on the note of Kutuzuv was that Francis is able to convince the Czar before the battle that a more cautious plan would be necesary to deal with the French allowing Kutuzuv to retain control and organize the Austrian defences along better lines. Even if the allies could eventually push back the french they would be tired and overextended and napoleon coud organize a better defence closer to france.

Ive read up the frankfurt proposal, from what i can see it would be impossible for it to move forward. Napoleon was willing to accept the original proposal which granted them trading rights, the return of colonies ,and parts of Europe they had conuered, but the British ultimately blocked this and demanded the status quo anti bellum, which would have ruined napoleon's regime forever, the negotiations were ultimately doomed to fail without the original proposal being accept granting france the Natural borders they desired, (the Rhine  Belguim etc, which i believe was part of the agreement) but the british would not have allowed this. Nkbeeching (talk) 12:31, September 20, 2013 (UTC)

ok so would it be plausible for Napoleon and the allies to negotiate Napoleon taking the lands up to the rhine and belguim? That would leave the French posed for a second war of conquest a few generations later for a new coliation largely made of German states this time to deal with the new napoleonic threat. Nkbeeching (talk) 12:59, September 20, 2013 (UTC)

um alright, thanks, so the post proposal borders would be like OTL post treaty of Paris, with Prussia gaining the rhineland? or would it be different, my honest hope for this timeline isnt one of French dominance as you may have noticed but rather of a more violent Europe and the earlier unification of Germany and Italy While possibly bringing Austria and Prussia closer together (havent decided on that one really yet) because of continued French aggression. Along with a spanish attempt to eventually retake their colonies in the Americas leading to increasing tensions with britain and the States.Nkbeeching (talk) 14:11, September 20, 2013 (UTC)

yeah ive been looking further into the proposal i honestly cant see them happening even with Napoleon accepting to negotiate on those terms, neither britain or Russia would have accepted it. im looking for another PoD right now to see if i can find a battle either early on or later on in the war that would have made a stalemate neither could continue with. if the frankfurt proposal really is plausible ill use it but im not sure about it, firstly because there is no spceifics of what it really was, and because it states in all the texts ive read so far, that it promised Napoleon the 1792 borders which included belgian and parts of the western part of the rhine, and neither the russians or the british would accept this, thus napoleon wouldn't either. Nkbeeching (talk) 17:04, September 20, 2013 (UTC)

i think ill go with the prussians joining the third coliation in 1805, i will have the coliation loss still because it is implausible for them to beat the French at that point but from there i can make longer conflicts which might eventually push the french back into western germany by the 1810's and ill see from there, i just want to run with the idea of no fourth coliation and see were it goes it plausible and im not ensuring anyones victory just yet. Nkbeeching (talk) 18:14, September 20, 2013 (UTC)

i know the end result will be a french viictory, ive already had them winning the third coalition and ive already realized the whole german situation, in tyhe timeline,however dont forget that the fourth coalition was effectively prussia alone, whle the end result would be effectively the same, the rest of the history would be affected, i still havent worked out changes ike ive stated ill be taking things by year and seing how they develop.Nkbeeching (talk) 16:54, September 24, 2013 (UTC)

Yo LG
I was wondering why my timeline Red, White, and Red was labled ASB: Biased. Octavian, Hail Marius (Play With Oct!) 01:08, September 19, 2013 (UTC)

Image Renaming
Hello! could you tell me how to rename my previously uploaded images? that way i will be able to use them on one of my pages? Vincent Mackay (talk) 14:36, September 19, 2013 (UTC)

Categories
What exactly are you talking about? Mscoree (talk) 14:06, September 20, 2013 (UTC)

Please don't ban me for asking, but I was just curious as to what categories were viewed as unneeded. Are you talking about stuff like ? I saw that you removed the tag "Battle for Earth: Prime". Mscoree (talk) 18:52, September 20, 2013 (UTC)

Um alright. Is there some sort of rule that map games cannot be marked as map games if they're already marked as ASB? What other rules are there. I'm simply trying to help by categorizing stuff. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 22:38, September 24, 2013 (UTC)

As an example, why did you remove the tag "Wars" from The War of the Foresaken page? I'm pretty sure it's a war, and there's no categories that override this. Mscoree (talk) 18:55, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

I am looking at the categories. There is no "Wars" or war-related tags, only "Under Construction", "Under Construction (The Demonic Plague)", "The Demonic Plague", and "War of the Forsaken (The Demonic Plague)". Unless you can prove that this page isn't a war, or can explain what you mean clearly by maybe telling me the category you believe replaces "Wars" so we can continue on our business (hopefully in only one message), I think this deserves the category. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 14:11, September 26, 2013 (UTC)

The last category is the name of the war that all battles and conflict-related pages would go. It's like having a category called "World War 2 (The Demonic Plague)" that all WW2 pages in the timeline link. If you were to have a major war like this, I'd imagine that it should link to the Wars category, as well as its own personal category for suching through battles and stuff. Right now none of the categories link to "Wars". Mscoree (talk) 10:33, September 27, 2013 (UTC)

That would make sense if the category actually was linked to Wars, which it's not, and if all other war pages didn't have the war category. Mscoree (talk) 14:08, September 27, 2013 (UTC)

Wabash Union (Doomsday)
I think I have an idea for how the Wabash Union sneaks under Superior's radar. What if they were mostly just the city of Lafayette until after the explorers return? And isn't it possible that the nomads don't know every survivor state in the area? Yank 02:05, September 22, 2013 (UTC)

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station
I'm sorry I haven't worked on my page. I have been engrossed in writing my book and several map games. I added info to the page, and have a few questions:

Thank You for all your help. Daeseunglim (talk) 18:59, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) I state that the engineers managed to shut down the facility, is that ok? I presume that would be the case, otherwise State College would not have gotten as far east as they did.
 * 2) The facility was abandoned. Realistically, why would you stay in a potentially dangerous area with little food and radioactive water.
 * 3) How big was the bomb dropped on Wilks-Barre/Scranton? I went on Ground Zero II, and found that the 'Joe 4', the first Soviet Hydrogen bomb would have left the facility intact.
 * 4) Does State College control the area? A follow up of my last question. If State College did, they could potentially get it back online with time (Years obviously, and lots of money due to the state of it in 2013).

Wrapping up the Operation
Hey LG. It has been a while!

So basically, I have been making some progress on the page, adding a photo here - adding a new section and paragraph there. Initially, I was searching through a few photos and decided to upload them to the wiki to help add more life to the page. Then I noticed that one of the pictures I added had US troops along with their Indian counterparts. I didn't want to delete it, so I just added ANZC troops supporting UIP soldiers. That brings me to my first point - would it be possible for the Commonwealth to send some 50 or so troops to help the UIP? Considering they played a significant role in the formation of the UIP, I wonder if it would be possible for them to just send a token support of help to show that the UIP still has their support or something? I know it really is for the picture to be able to be used, but hey, why not?

This question actually got me thinking about the wider scope of things going on. What is the current status of the UIP in terms of allies? Right now, I can see that the closest nations they have to being allies is the ANZAC and the Siberians. The SAC obviously cut off all their aid to the nation following its invasion. I am hoping for the UIP to be able to move forward now, and focus on internal as well as external development.

Since the deals with the Siberians more than a year ago now would have had significantly noticeable results, such as the rapid progression of UIP troops due to the Siberian advisers and trainers helping improve efficiency of the forces, I reckon the UIP would be hoping to get closer to the Siberians. Their army is already beginning to be amped up to superior standards compared to its neighbour.

Plus, with the cutting out of aid, I think the country will begin to focus on projects like reservoir construction to help improve conditions needed to grow crops. Did you know that the Kingdom of Mysore in its heyday had 40,000 reservoirs? The UIP will need to replicate that sort of numbers (I think the reservoirs were pretty small, but still - you get my point) but have much bigger reservoirs. I think that a new public awareness program would be raised, and an effort would be made especially to get the message across to remote villages. I think they might even look into constructing some dams.

And to wrap it up (for now that is), how do you think the newly captured territories will be assimilated? Will the state of Assam be reformed or will the whole area just become Arunanchal Pradesh or will the whole area become just a territory. And what of its people? Will they be forcefully moved and replaced with Indians from other parts of the nation? Considering the world would not really find out if the UIP manage it successfully, they could take the risk maybe? I look forward to your response. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 21:01, September 24, 2013 (UTC)

I see. So no aid from ANZC. Well, as long as they are allies, it helps the UIP cause. And thank you about the image, atleast I get to keep it. Its a pretty good one too, lol.

I agree, they need new public programs. Considering we have the ability to backtrack, I think we should use that. Yea, repairs in the newly conquered territories could be a hassle, but these programs will help provide jobs and help fuel the economy so it might end up creating a lot of growth.

Assam? Ok. So all the captured area becomes the territory of Assam with autonomous divisions for the other states incorporated? And the people don't move. Well that might become a problem, but with good propoganda I think that problem might be able to be sorted out.

I also had another proposition. Seeing as to how the UIP has such a large population, a lot of them would want to move out. Seeing how the Australians could use a population boost quite nicely, and so could the Siberians. I propose that the government begins a plan to reduce the load slightly by offering its citizens the chance to move to more "developed" countries and help create a better life for their children as well as create less mouths to feed in the nation. This would mean that the Siberians would be able to gain a lot more citizens and so would the ANZC.

So what do you think? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 17:24, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry if it seemed random. I wonder if you remember a WRCB post by Gansu I made stating the leader incorporated the southern areas, hoping to gain better approval by his people? that was what i was basically trying to reflect in the map. Other maps? Like other China maps? Oh, well I had thought those nations would have expanded by now, but as shown by the TL, the ability to backtrack is present so I guess that is ok if they haven't had active nations in a while.

And could you respond on my previous message please? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 18:34, September 28, 2013 (UTC)

I seriously don't know why I keep trying this, but I *think* this new map would be better for the area. The Azanian League expands on all sides of its borders, so does Waterboersland. The Orange Free State hasn't expanded all that much. I have slightly increased the expansion of New Britain and Volkstaat.

So, once again, what do you think? On a sidenote, the whites I was referring to last time where in the Orange Free State. I was wondering whether they would have implemented programs to bolster the white population and to make sure the whites make up atleast a third to a half of their nation? I am sure they would not have any hesitancy in taking resources from the blacks in their nation to support their want for a growing white population. So yeah. Btw, I'm still awaiting a response on my previous UIP reltated message. :P  Imp (Say Hi?!) 15:18, September 29, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for the response time, I have been having a busy week. It really isn't nice having to write an essay in 45 mins as practice for English! The message I was referring to was the paragraph with the opening line "I also had another proposition" lol. I'll add it onto the Gansu page then, although I really wish Vlad would come back online. This wiki needs its flagship timeline to be there in the wiki feed more often. Without it, I feel it is too chaotic. When I joined, it was a different time. People were into their own timelines. Perhaps I haven't done enough, but I am trying to make up to it by adding stuff to DD. I did once state that DD is actually just a hugely detailed map game with crazily plausible mods and the strictest rules on the wiki, and I guess upto a point it is true, too.

I have tried to make it logical. Next time, just bullet point the things I did wrong, no need to be too nice. It will save us both some time lol. I see you agree with my proposal. Fun fact, I had asked to adopt the Orange Free State - took me 10 days short of a year to realise I could as I had had no response! That makes it mine too, and all these discussions legimate.

So the Orange Free State. Where can we get the white immigrants to arrive from? Europe? South America? Zimbabwe (wait, this one might actually be viable)? Now I realise SA's population at the time of creation was around 35 Million and out of that about 1/5 were white. That number leaves us with 7 Million. Half of them fleed to the Orange Free State - ~3.5 Million. Numbers bolstered over time from [white] immigrants and extensive birth program would leave us with 5 million. Lets say 1:1 ratio of white to black - giving us 10 million. Good population numbers. but still making it a good deal weaker than other nations' in the region. I feel that South Africa's overall population would actually be roughly the same (if not slightly more actually) as OTL actually. We just swap the AIDS emidemic for the Doomsday genocide and stronger white immigration and population boom.

Moving onto the Indian immigration. I guess just spread the word and fund a few ships. The Orange Free State would definately recognise Indians not to be exactly at par with the whites, but definately better than the blacks. I would presume they would take midway position in the order of things. Jobs such as bankers, teachers - mainly the service industry, you know? Whites would specialise in leading industrial works and ruling the nation. I would think that the arrival of Indians could actually help make the region a more stable place, unless...

We create a bit of drama and get them to attack KwaZulu or Waterboersland for whatever reason you can fathom. They would probably target the Zulus thinking about it (bad relations). This might cause NUSA and New Britain to co-operate to take the nation down, with a land grab by the Azanians to the north too. The beauty of this is that a lot of the articles have not even been updated past 2007 so we could play around with time. Or we could make this a 2012-2013 thing.

Now I know you will shoot down as lot of my discussion points, but be nice about it. Not too many bold or italic words lol. I do hope that my points at least set you thinking about some of this. Plus, I have been thinking what the value of the Union Rand would be. 1 Deutsch Mark is equal to around 60 ANZC Dollars, but obviously KwaZulu and Lesotho's currencies might not be that strong. Maybe we peg it with the AnZC Dollar to make trading with probably their preferred trading partners easier?

I await your response. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 18:20, October 3, 2013 (UTC)

I work on the map. Finally, only two things to do and we are done with the map! Thank god, took me ages.

Hmm, ok so we have 15% white out of 30 million. That gives us 4.5 Million in the 80s  - more than 3 Million lol. The whites will be focused on reproducing their numbers - they start off with ~2 Million. I think they could manage to cross 4.5 million whites in the OFS by 2011 - we need to see immigration will help their cause and cause larger numbers.

LG, the area has fertile lands, has plentiful mines and already established towns. I do think there is a very strong chance they would manage to get at least double of the numbers you predict. It isn't hard to build from existing cities and trading will help boost their economy very nicely to make the industry better and housing construction quick. And there are a lot of blacks in KwaZulu as well as the Azanian League- as they would probably look to head to those areas. C'mon LG.

Encouraging immigration. What year can we say they started to? It would have to be after the formation of the UIP and probably after the formation of NUSA. That would give us 2005 onward. If you need the numbers, just say it was because of the Indians. There is no way only a few hundred thousand coming over. Indians will arrive, and in great numbers. To them, it is a better chance at life - a good nation which has a growing economy and job oppurtunities.

I see. So we go with the "prosperous" route for the OFS. So the ANZC isn't up for it? Well, that is a shame. There is a lot to play around with between 1 and 60. I think it would make sense to have 1 Union Rand = 10 ANZC Dollars.

So yeah. :P  Imp (Say Hi?!) 18:33, October 4, 2013 (UTC)

Wabash Union II
Then why isn't it graduated yet? I would think that a somewhat more decentralized nation like this would be a good addition to the timeline. And why are there still articles that haven't left the proposal list in months or years? Yank 02:15, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Prop vs Stub
Thanks, Ganon, for the correction. I was not sure which to add, since this is merely an extention of the Food article. A new user suggested interest, so I created the stub for further development. Should I place proposal up on the main page?

It's good to see you're still holding down the fort. Are you planning anything special for the 30th anniversary of 1983DD this week? I suppose I need to update the leadership of the USA there, at least. I like a Brownback-Heath win, but I'm game for a Simpson-Brownback administration. I know, off topic. lol. What say you? SouthWriter (talk) 14:36, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Antarctica in RA
Thank you so much for your reply (hope you didn't mind me not noting you personally). I'm absolutely astonished that this may have some merit. Though the ultimate question (which I left out because I was convinced this would not be possible) is what they claim. As I've made mention, the likeliest part to claim would be the territories explored by Bellingshausen, which (for better or worse) would be the Antarctic Peninsula region (i.e., the Argentina/British/Chilean claims). Would this be possible? Or should I look elsewhere? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:57, September 25, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you once again for your input. I'm definitely happy right now, and glad the Russians can get the area I'm interested in. I will do more reading on the area and will start on a map. Though I only have a few more questions. If the Russians claim the area before the British do, would the Brits still make their claim to the same area? I do know they would eventually claim more territory on behalf of Australia and New Zealand, but not sure whether this should count. Given that Argentina and Chile ignore the British claims a few decades later, I doubt they would find the Alaskan/Russian claims any more valid. Any thoughts? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 18:13, September 26, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the fyi. Not so much it wouldn't be used, rather I wish to stay away from it personally. At least for me, its like saying that there are more than one area named Columbia. (LOL) --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:38, October 6, 2013 (UTC)

New Nation
Could I make a nation in Bloomsburg, PA? It is about 7 miles south of the SSES.

I will make it have a population of 9,378 people in 2013, a population of 4,219 people just after doomsday. It would control Bloomsburg, and Mainville. The town would be isolated b/c it doesn't have much connection to the outside world. It has a college and a hospital.

Is that ok? I was gonna tie in the SSES into it. Thanks.

Daeseunglim (talk) 16:18, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Red, White, and Red
Hey, LG. I just wanted to inform you that, so far, Red, White, and Red, isn't ASB. The concept may be, but that is just that - a concept. We have no working POD, nor any specific end-results. I understand if later on you want to apply that tag (I am cool with it), but Thanks for your time! On a side note, you say you are a historian. That is a field I would be interested in pursuing, so is there anything you can tell me about what you do, who you work for (if its not gonna give away the location, just say "a university", or "a national library."), and stuff like that! You are a cool guy, and (although sometimes I don't show this) I respect you as a role-model. Thanks,
 * 1) We are gonna do everything possible to make the ASB concept as un-ASB as possible.
 * 2) Isn't the purpose of an Alt-Hist to analyze what would happen if something went different, went wrong? Therefore, the analysis can be ASB, but I feel the concept cannot really be ASB. (You've been doing it longer than me, so I naturally defer to you.)
 * 3) I also feel the Biased tag is inaccurate. Personally, I have communism, and feel FDR, LBJ and Lincoln were some of our worst presidents. On the other hand you have Octivian, who loves Communism and its ideals. Therefore, we will counter each others' biases. Also, I cannot be biased when writing it, since I would be if anything against the concept of Communism in the US (one of my fears).

05:06, September 28, 2013 (UTC)

PS. You may not be the best guy to ask, but how can I get my sig not to go into code form? I have a template for it, but it always reverts to code.

PPS. How does this sound? I think it is the most plausible way to incorporate a Debs presidency. Link.

Ok, so a few things. A look into the minds of Reximus!
 * 1) Thank you very much for your thorough and detailed report back to me. I really appreciate it.
 * 2) I never knew you were Canadian and/or went to college in Canada. Just interesting, because that actually does shift ones left-right viewpoint a lot. A conservative in Canada is more or less a liberal in the US, so I just thought that is interesting.
 * 3) I think it is possible that, with the endorsements of Roosevelt and Bryan (even though those may be a stretch to get to), Debs and Gompers chould have won. But given your history, I won't argue that, because I know that you know your stuff better than I do. (I'd never hurd of Champ Clark).
 * 4) In addition, I think that Gompers and Debs could've grown to be more politically connected. Debs first became a socialist while in prison after Pullman. So, if Gompers was also there, he'd also have the same exposure. Also, since Gompers had a better reputation than Debs, he would've been able to make their stay in prison almost like Mandela's, except for labor.
 * 5) And I don't think that the TL is biased to help a certain people. I will admit that it is ASB in order to let Debs win, however, I feel that most TLs about elections are somewhat biased in this regard.
 * 6) I don't think that my facts on FDR and LBJ are too off, I just am a firm believer in the exact words, and intents of Madison and the Framers, of the Constitution, and I feel that both of them weren't good at following the Constitution. I will give you that I think JFK was an amazingly inspiring individual, and I actually am ok with his policies for the most part.
 * 7) I am a libertarian and a conservative. As such, I even disprove of Bush's continuation of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (especially Iraq). I feel that he ought to have taken us out after Hussein was deposed. I feel the Middle East is just as bad as the Balkans were prior to WWI, so we ought to stay out of there! In Syria, in Iraq, in Iran. As a libertarian, I dislike military intervention in other nations. I think you should know that when you hear what I think about these people. I also HATE entitlements (Social Security, Food Stamps, Obamacare, Medicare, and Medicaid). They are unconstitutional.
 * 8) LBJ - The primary reason I dislike him is the entitlements of Medicare and Medicaid, and the expansion of Social Security. He was vital to the situation in Vietnam. I also think he used Kennedy to pass Civil Rights Act of 1964, which violates our rights of association. (By this I mean that business owners can no longer regulate their own business establishments, and prevent blacks if they feels so inclined. I actually do not dislike black people, Lt. Col. Allen West is a hero of mine. I am merely arguing the constitutionality of that legislation, not the intent.) "No memorial oration or eulogy could more eloquently honor President Kennedy's memory than the earliest possible passage of the civil rights bill for which he fought so long" Another reason I dislike him is his Great Society and War on Poverty. Neither of those are the federal government's job.
 * 9) FDR - An extreme liberal from American perspectives, FDR interfered with the ongoing Depression. Firstly this is not permitted in the Constitution what so ever. The first presidents (maybe not Adams or Washington, under Hamilton's school of thought) were in favor of laisseiz-faire (the purest form of capitalism), and instituted his New Deal. He prolonged the Depression by sending us into another recession, and he was all in favor of war! The US should've been fighting the Soviets alongside Hitler's men, not killing our ancestors - the Germanic Aryan race. (A bit rascist sounding, but oh well, it true.) Furthermore, he created Social Security, a program that will place huge burdens on our generation, and eventually bankrupt our nation, by paying for 15 years of subsidies to the Baby Boom.
 * 10) Lincoln - Now, I know this a most unorthodox world view! I have met very few people who share this sentiment. However, I feel that Lincoln was the worst President in the US history. In elementary school, I remember with pride the day when my teacher taught me how the US was the only nation in the world to only intervene in military affairs for the people of that nation. I thought that was amazing, because when all other nations fought for Empire, the US fought for Freedom. Then, looking at US history, I saw one person who broke this rule. Abraham Lincoln.
 * 11) Lying to Get Elected - Abraham Lincoln was from the radical Republican party. His party was dedicated to ruining the economies of the South by eradicating slavery - a practice which is condoned Biblically - even in the New Testament. Lincoln later issued the Emancipation Proclamation.
 * 12) The Civil War - As states enter the Union, they have every right to leave the Union. Since the Constitution says nothing about exiting the Union, it falls under the jurisdiction of the 9th/10th Ammendments to the US Constitution. The states were allowed to secede.
 * 13) West Virginia - The Constitution is very specific about what may or may not become a state. It says that no state may be formed within the borders of an existing state. Did Lincoln care? No! He allowed WV to become a state, although the Const. forbids it.
 * 14) Other than that, he took away the rights of a people for to determine for themselves what they want. Lincoln set a precedent that revoked our individual sovereignty.
 * 15) I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical. - Thomas Jefferson
 * 16) I also dislike Wilson, for more obvious reasons of internationalism and the League of Nations. America for Americans! We got into a big enough mess in WWI also.
 * 17) People always call conservatives "war hawks," but look at FDR and LBJ and Lincoln and Wilson. They got us into Vietnam, WWII, the Civil War, and WWI! All told, about 1.2 million men died due to liberals getting us into wars that I woudln't have fought.
 * 18) My Top 5 American Presidents
 * 19) Thomas Jefferson
 * 20) Ronald Reagan
 * 21) James Madison
 * 22) Andrew Jackson
 * 23) Jefferson Davis (Well, he was American!)
 * 24) My Bottom 5 American Presidents
 * 25) Abraham Lincoln
 * 26) FDR
 * 27) LBJ
 * 28) Woodrow Wilson
 * 29) Jimmy Carter (The Recession Wasn't His Fault)

Can we just block Rex? His continuous violation of NCNC and his BS is, quite bluntly, annoying.

<span style="-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(#FFFFFF 50%,#FFFFFF 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(#FFD700 50%,#000000 50%));"><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding-bottom:1px;padding-top:1px;-webkit-border-radius: 1px 1px;-moz-border-radius: 1px / 1px;-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6);background-image:-webkit-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#080808 45%,#000000 50%);background:-moz-repeating-radial-gradient(ellipse,#CCCCFF 45%,#000000 50%));border-top-left-radius:500px 400px;border-bottom-left-radius:500px 400px">               <span style="background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, right top, left top, from(#ffffff), to(#ffffff)); -webkit-border-radius: 36px 12px; -moz-border-radius: 36px / 12px; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px 5px #00ff00; border:2px double #E5E4E2 border-radius:5px; border-bottom-right-radius:100px 90px; border-top-right-radius:100px 90px; color:#FFFFFF"> <font color="#0000ff" face="Helvetica">"Fear leads to anger. <font color=navy face="Helvetica"> Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to    <font color="#000000" face="Helvetica" title="Blog"> suffering."  23:16, September 29, 2013 (UTC)

I do not like to be blocked. LG asked me about all this (I did elaborate a good deal), and so did other players, so that is why I made the Blog Post. Take it down if you'd like to.

Anyway, LG, I was just looking at a buch of TLs (danged Random Article button!) and Red, White, and Red really isn't so bad. We have tried to make a the most plausible way for Debs to be elected. I know it would never happen, so an ASB tag is ok, but thinking about it, I think we need a new category.

ASB-Elections. There are tons of articles and TLs out there were an election goes way ASB. In fact, almost all (maybe minus Al Gore TLs) should be ASB-Biased based off of your criterion.

This will better distinguish actual TLs, like mine, and those crazy Sealion, CSA, and Nazi Victory TLs which truly are biased. This is just a suggestion, but hey! Thanks, and please do not ban me!

Sorry for forgetting this part. In the area around Phoenix, Arizona. Thanks for your extended post in response. But still, any thoughts on ASB-Elections? I will be willing to lead the hunt for ASB Election scenarios if you need help on that front! Thanks,

So, any thoughts on ASB-Elections? And did you think I lived in the South?

Template screw up
Hey i kind of made a mistake editing a Template and it wont let me undo my edit to fix/undo the action. wasnt sure to contact figured you could help me out. Its just saying there is an intermediate revision and i cant do anything about it. Thats just for further information. Sorry for any inconvinience. &#35;LivinLikeFeudal (talk)

Template RTS

Just curious
I know it is maybe a not so important question, but is NFSreloaded already the one of TSPTF members? FirstStooge (talk) 07:59, September 30, 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I will refrain myself about the "mustard note" on the vandals.

Okay, then. But, I believe one day N will joining the TSPTF as well. :) FirstStooge (talk) 11:03, October 1, 2013 (UTC)

I know. I referring all of my notes as "mustard notes"... FirstStooge (talk) 11:38, October 1, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Undoing
Ahhhh now i understand thank you very much i was bewildered. i literally had no idea what was going on with it. Thanks again for telling me. &#35;LivinLikeFeudal (talk) 06:23, October 1, 2013 (UTC)

Commonwealth of Susquehanna
Thank u for ur help. I will get around to changing the items that u requested. I do have a few questions:
 * there are two artillery guns in Danville memorial park that have been there since 1970. The only thing wrong with them is they are welded shut. So I was using those as the base for my artillery.
 * There was/is a mechanized infantry regiment in Bloomsburg that has been there since before 1983. Is that ok if I use 3-6 vehicles b/c they are reserve units?
 * Life Flight has bein in operation since 1981. The 5 helicopters they started with were 10 yrs old. I was assuming that they were damaged, but they cannabalized two for parts to repair the other three.

Just as a note, the tank is not a M60 Patton, it is an M47 Patton, only used until the late 1960's, so it is likely that it could have been a monument (which I think it was for a time, then switched out later)

Thank you for your help, and are the other things u mentioned in the first request better?

Daeseunglim (talk) 10:14, October 3, 2013 (UTC)

Ok, a few points and questions:

1- There are 3 airports within a 10-20 mile radius of Bloomsburg. At this time I found there was a total of 30-45 aircraft between them. Figuring 1/2 EMPed, and another 1/3 used for parts, etc. That leaves 10-13 aircraft.

2-

Another Section
I felt it would be better starting a new message section, lol. I feel these are productive discussions going on between us. Now for my response.

That was a misunderstanding on my part then I would suppose. The talkpages of the Azanian league stated that a quarter were killed, a quarter formed Heiligdom and half went to the OFS areas. I'll put initial number of whites down to 1.5 Million in the OFS, but LG, it needs to be seen that they can and will reproduce quickly to make sure they have dominance. Why can't there be 4.5 Million of them? Are you telling me that a lot of the whites are going to be in KwaZulu instead? If that is so, then maybe your population figues might work out better, but I have my doubts.

And why would there not be more than 3 Million? The are can easily accomadate the numbers - they have the towns and they have the industry. And it is not like small booming towns cannot be built.

Sure, let them have high populations. But what I am saying is other areas will also have a significant number of people present too.

I see, so not that many. But why would this even be the case? Many could and would have gotten out and a few 10,000 seems little low for my liking.

I found it on the article itself, here. And that has been around quite a while. That is where I got my conversion rate from.

I have also uploaded the new version of the map. Imp (Say Hi?!) 15:26, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

I see. Now that clears it up much better, and lets me understand where you were getting your numbers from.

Hey, I do keep up with quite a few discussions, its jus that I have a tendancy to forget most of the things discussed ( :P ). I saw it on the Azanian League talkpage, although in hindsight, this might have been for the areas the League controlled.

I thought the RZA was an evil warlord reigime from which the whites would have run away from, or atleast most would have tried out of the 0.9 million living there at the time DD occured.

So if we add up the total % of whites in League territory, we get ~43% of total whites. That gives us around 2 million whites. Out of these, half made it to the OFS, quarter died and quarter made it to Heiligdom. That gives us 1 mil to OFS, 500k dead and 500k to Heiligdom (oh, these numbers are a lot closer to your estimates). So you say we still have some in the League, lets put that to 50k - so that gives us 950k fleeing to OFS. But the number could be even lower to this maybe (check Oer's talkpage to see what I mean).

It might not be at the time, but if you can get whites herders (rooinek), then I don't see why they canot adopt an African mentality of multiple children (3+). But that is just my thoughts really, because matters like these remain unpredictable. Industry can be rebuilt, and so could housing. Ok, it might take like 10 years, but it would happen. Perhaps it might happen too late after DD to make any impact on the migration/choas times of the 80s.

I see. In that case, I would like the majority to head to New Britain. It seems like the most "free" nation out of those three. I know the Cape government would like liked Indians, but the quality of life would be better for them in NB.

It does if you think about it. £20,000 doesn't get you ships to transport people. On the other hand, £1,000,000 gives you a lot of options. I don't think you should have changed it to be honest. :P  Imp (Say Hi?!) 13:15, October 6, 2013 (UTC)

Blimey, this was 3 days ago and you already have a heck of a lot more sections after my one!

Each does sound better, gives the GSWA more prestige in my opinion, lol. Your explanation does seem to make a lot of sense - I guess Arstar probably got it wrong.

Oh? Well, I am not sure if that is on the Cape page or not. There seems to be something about excepting Indians, by both sides. I guess we have Gandhi to thank for that XD But KwaZulu does seem to be a good choice. I think I have control of that page now, so I will get the parts that Mitro say do not comply with canon fixed and add a sentence or two about it. Plus, I really do not think that area would just become fully tribal again like what the article seems to suggest. If anything, it will be one of the most organised state in the area and having fully functioning cities and roads. I am not sure about their industry or the ability to be able to use and such, however.

Hmm, it does decrease numbers. I really don't think I am LG, 500k is no small number at all + around 50-100k extra deaths is quite a bit, you know?

Oh. I guess then we cannot really talk about anything to do with mentality lol. So I think we are done for now about the area. Do you reckon the map was fine? If so - I'll get a better version ready with the same borders and upload it. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 17:30, October 9, 2013 (UTC)

Templates
How do you make a template also add a category? Mafia (talk) 17:51, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Articles
Since Mitro hasn't posted in over a year, I didn't think he'd mind if I adopted the articles, so I posted the message on the article talk page, instead of his private one, partially because I've seen you do it in the past. I wrote on the RTFA talk page that I'd like to adopt all of the stubs, considering they lacked any real content and were also basically connected. The only objector was yourself, whose only objection was basically "I hate Mscoree and banned from Doomsday", so I didn't really take that seriously. Several other admins have since told me that I could adopt them, so I accepted their best judgement. I don't see the point of reverting all that hard work and content because the paperwork isn't finished, so do you mind fixing that? Is it really necessary to trolololol me by undoing all my work because of past grudges, and to ensure you always win? So we're clear, do you mind telling me which rules were broken? Not to mention that one of the articles was even original. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 01:30, October 6, 2013 (UTC)

I also do not agree with your edits to . Firstly you removed the tag "Maps (1983: Doomsday)" in favor of "Maps". Considering this is an ATL map, different from OTL, pertaining to an ATL nation, in this specific timeline, I think it makes sense that it is labeled as being part of Doomsday. It's even on the maps page, and it's in the title. Next you removed the tag "RTFA (1983: Doomsday)". Since this image is of the RTFA's territory I think it makes sense that it be tied to its category. Lastly it has the "France (1983: Doomsday)" tag, which all RTFA and France articles have. Mscoree (talk) 02:52, October 6, 2013 (UTC)

I apologize if I angered you somehow but can we please approach this calmly and maturely? Mitro hasn't posted in over a year, so I so no harm in adopting his articles. Most of them were stubs anyway. I really don't think it's worth undoing all that hard work. If you could respond and answer my earlier questions that would be much appreciated. Mscoree (talk) 13:18, October 6, 2013 (UTC)

Firstly there are other ways to communicate with people other than talk pages. As far as I can tell there is no rule that says that a single objection vetoes someone's adoption, and it would appear you're making it up. That image actually is a Doomsday map, considering it is completely part of the ATL. It is quite altered compared to the actual OTL one on Wikipedia. Mscoree (talk) 10:34, October 8, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, there is in fact other ways to communicate other than talk pages. No where in the rules does it say anything about objecting adoptions, although people have told me this is an unofficial rule you practice. Lastly, I can't stress enough that and  are not the same map. I made the first one specifically for 1983: Doomsday. On an unrelated note, I've have a few amendments for the Africa Template on its talk page, and I was wondering if I'm allowed to change it or ask you to. I noticed there also a similar problem with the French template. Mscoree (talk) 10:36, October 10, 2013 (UTC)

I was going by the rules of 1983, but after reading the general wiki rules I see that there can be objections, usually to try and reach a compromise with the original editors. Thanks for directing me to these rules, as I now know I should appeal to the TSPTF because of you. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 14:13, October 11, 2013 (UTC)

How am I not following the adoption rules? Let's walk through them here:

Mscoree (talk) 10:38, October 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Contact the creator or most recent caretaker and ask if you can adopt the timeline (if it is an open timeline or collaborative project it may be necessary to contact more than one editor before you complete this step). If he or she says yes, you may adopt the timeline. If he or she says no, than you may not adopt the timeline. If you get no response after one week, go to step two.
 * Sent Mitro a message here. As you can see I asked him about each article.
 * Leave a message on the portal page stating your intentions to adopt the timeline and ask if anyone objects. If no one objects after three days, you may adopt the timeline. If there are objections, go to step three.
 * I left numerous messages on all pages, especially the portal/base page for the series of articles.
 * Listen to the objections and try to reach a comprise. The issue might be solved by simply sharing control over the timeline with the other editor(s).
 * I attempted to have a mature conversation with you about this but you clearly are unwilling.
 * If you cannot reach a comprise, appeal to the TSPTF.
 * I guess I really have to now.

Miracle at the Marne - Austria-Hungary
Hello Lordganon! I was wondering if you had any ideas on how to prevent or at least prolong the seperation of Austria-Hungary in the map game Miracle at Marne, as I was told you suggested it would still fall within 10 to 15 years. The only ideas I was able to come up with is more integration of the Austrian and Hungarian Parliaments; or at least since the First World War in this map game's POD lasted three years less than it did OTL, perhaps the extended victories, exemption of Austrian moral and casualty losses, and better supplies would prevent Leftist and Liberal strikes and uprisings that toppled the Austria-Hungarian Emperor Charles I/IV. Thanks! Eiplec - ಠ_ಠ (talk) 02:45, October 6, 2013 (UTC)

Miracle at Marne
Hey i was wondering. i thought the POD for the Miracle at Marne while good for a map game would be even better for a Timeline. Whats your rules/ opinion on having something like those existing side by side. Have a Timeline independent of the Game. So there would be the Miracle at Marne (Map Game) and just Miracle at Marne. Would i have to rename it so its less confusing or could i keep it as it. I figured id ask before i went ahead and did it. &#35;LivinLikeFeudal (talk) 20:18, October 6, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Russia/Ukraine in RA
Another idea that works? o_O

Ironically, it was because someone suggested this for New Union (and I turned it down) that I thought about it happening here. That was you? That's pretty funny.

The only thing I would disagree on is the name and size of the split. From what I've gotten, I would think that the Russian-speaking regions would by far support such a move (especially if a civil war breaks out). I see it including (at most) all the oblasts that voted for Kuchma in 1994, all of which have Russian-understanding majorities (that being the case, "Donbas" wouldn't work). By the time you read this, I should have a map of how I see such a state. Thank you again for your reply. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:06, October 8, 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't completely understand what you are talking about. This idea has nothing to do with Russian-speaking majority areas but on pro-Russian areas. If you look at this page (in Russian), practically all of the Ukraine speaks Ukrainian. If "that" map is not workable, than maybe this map may be a little more accurate, showing once of those macroregions as having a Russian plurality (i.e., the largest percentage but not a majority). If you also look at this map, you can see the fluency of Russian and Ukrainian.


 * While the first two presidential elections are different from the later ones, any civil war would likely take place in the mid to late 1990s (when these results would still be in place). On that same note, virtually all the area of my eastern state either voted for independence and then communists in the first two parliamentary elections (at least the communists would likely support a Russian merger).


 * This overall idea has to do with pro-Russian sentiment. While voting and language may be an odd issue in the short term, a civil war would likely destabilize the area and expand the pro-Russian areas. Much of the south has been Russified and would likely support any Russian assistance, while the northwestern parts would be much more anti-Russian. In regards to Odessa, they actually have a Ukrainian plurality (with Russians not too far behind) and a Russified population. I highly doubt that they would be willing to remain outside a pro-Russian area. At the very least, any Eastern state would include all the coastline (leaving the west landlocked).


 * This reminds me of how Tennessee and Virginia voted for a different candidate in 1860 than the majority of the south, but the chaos of the Civil War lead both of them to side with the CSA. I also see much of these "fence" regions of the Ukraine following this same logic. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 17:01, October 10, 2013 (UTC)

I think I'm starting to remember why I turned down this idea in New Union. The definition of an eastern state you suggest is too small for my liking, excludes areas that were (among other things) the main reasons I looked into this in the first place (i.e., Odessa, a physical connection to Transnistria, and to a lesser extent the Chernobyl exclusion zone), and contradict what I've read about the area. If a smaller state is all you are advocating, than maybe this isn't such a good idea after all. I think I'm going to now leave out the Ukraine and simply focus on the remaining areas of interest. Thank you for your help. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:32, October 11, 2013 (UTC)

'Don't Wear it Out'
I have to ask, this was on your page ("The name's LG, don't wear it out"), did that come from Green Day's Saint Jimmy?

Ahh, ok. Just wondering. Sounded somewhat similar.

Don't let Oct hear that someone once called you 'Lord'. ;)

Appreciation
I really do appreciate it. There are so many clinks in the machine in South Africa - even the situation of India in terms of articles is significantly better.

So, if you have been keeping up with the news occuring in India recently, we have a hurricane (typhoon, if you must) on the loose. Considering the Aussie floods didn't happen, I was wondering what was going to happen to this. Extra rainfall in the Thar and Deccan (great for crops)? The hurricane happens as OTL (which really the UIP could really do without) or do we change its path and make it weaker so it only affects northern sections of Tamil Nadu and most of former Andhra?

And I take it the South Africa map is ready. I'll get to making the one with the new borders now. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 16:01, October 15, 2013 (UTC)

Plus, I reckon Operation Dissolution is ready for grad. We should get ready to backtrack. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 17:27, October 15, 2013 (UTC)

I'll change that and add the new borders on the map then.

I see, so a milder Hurricane. But how would this affect the UIP? Make them weaker or actually make them stronger by being able to reconstruct old rundown buildings in a much better manner, attracting entrepeneurs to invest in the new construction buzz and such. Plus, casualities would be low due to the number of soldiers who would already be present at the sight to help evacuate civilians and help clear up the mess later on.

However, the UIP will have this become a strain on resources and I really don't know what could happen if things don't go like what i said in the last para.

But atleast Operation Dissolution is done and dusted! :)  Imp (Say Hi?!) 16:47, October 16, 2013 (UTC)

I see. As long as he will follow those procedures the next time, we should not have a problem. Although I do have a small request. Could you give him a bit more space? I know the history between you two isn't great (and lets be honest, Ms has pissed off a lot of people here - me especially) but I think we should try to work around it. It really isn't that bad.

Great, the UIP has to spend more money - just what they needed right now. Just when we thought they might actually be able to get some work on their interior systems done we have a hurricane -.- However, so far we are only looking at around 20 or so deaths. Is there any chance the SAC will be forced to send aid once more? They cannot be seen to look biased and bad toward a nation in front of the whole LoN, so maybe the giving of aid atleast temporarily once more maybe? That would help the UIP significantly.

And I have been wanting to ask you about KwaZulu. Seeing as to how they are tribal, is there a chance we can get them to keep their culture but have them move forward socially as well as technologically - like OTL India by any chance? This is because I am highly unsure of how the nation would be compared to others in the region. Would it become NUSA's burden, or actually be their best state because of its population and the number of troops they can gather? I also have the union states taking part in joint military operations - on a scale not seen before. This was mainly to do with securing roads and transportation routes for helping trade boom. I know we just got over the map and stuff, but this would mean we would have thin lines of expansion in the middle of unoccupied land - representing the land controlled by NUSA. Could this work? And could this be represented in the next update of the map around springtime 2014?

I am pretty sure I have more questions about various other topics, but I'll allow you to answer these questions first before pressing on! XD  Imp (Say Hi?!) 14:31, October 17, 2013 (UTC)

Red, White, and Red (cont.)
Hi, LG. I just wanted to see if you could revisit a few things in my TL, Red, White, and Red.

I understand how at first, without seeing how the TL ended working out, you could categorize it as ASB-Biased. However, after fleshing out a bit more of the TL, including a list of presidents, I feel that, with a victory by William Jennings Bryan in 1896, it is plausible for Debs to have eventually been elected.

Under Bryan's tenure, he introduced bimetallism, which made him popular with the lower classes, whilst alienating the upper classes. He then proceded to nationalize the telegraph and eventually railroad systems. This sets up the scene for Debs to win, provided that he earns Bryan's endorsement, which he does because of the extensive support Debs and Gompers gave Bryan during his tenure as President. Thanks for your Time, <span style="border:3px solid blue; "> <font color="#FF0000" face="Sans-Serif" title="Reximus">Reximus   <font color="#FF0000" face="Sans-Serif" title="Talk">Maximus  09:18, October 17, 2013 (UTC)

What is map game? Can someone introduce me as to what a map game is and how they work? FilipinoMan (talk) 14:31, October 17, 2013 (UTC)FilipinoMan

Re:US States in RA
Thank you for the input. I would've been more surprised if you actually said Greenland would've worked out. Also, I truly meant to say it would be an organized territory (I have no idea how "unorganized" got there). Lol. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 17:00, October 17, 2013 (UTC)

Questions it is!
Thanks! I will asking quite a few then. Just to let you know, the final version of the map with the borders and the small changes you recommended is being made, so that should be up soon.

Hmm. Well I think with Ms, I would like to adopt a Guns type of working - working with him to let him prove to you that he is capable, although I can tell that will take a long time, lol.

Damn the SAC. They are evil hypocrites.

You just solved my biggest problem with the nation. Thank god. I guess that means they will be living in cities and stuff but its just that they celebrate like their festivals like how their ansestors did. I guess their armed forces would provide the numbers, while the other states would provide the equipment. And this is good becasue it means that KwaZulu is not a burden for the Union - its a boon.

No joint operations? Aw man. When can we expect it to take place then?

And I was wondering if all of the citizens of Waterboersland where white. Or are they by majority a mixed people (as in mixed descendants)? And with Orange Free State, how long will the apartheid government last. Eventually you will get pro-peace, anti-apartheid and pro-NUSA government come up sometime. This would mean that the area could become more stable, but how long would it take?

Oh, and would the Azanian League focus its expansion into uncontrolled Botswana now? And when will Botswana once again move southward. From what I can tell, that page hasn't been expanded upon for a while now.

And would you be able to pinpoint the free location in Canada for the UFC? It has been a long time, but hey - another crack at it couldn't hurt. Plus, any nation willing to start up Star Trek again (hopefully the ANZC or - thats right - the Siberians?). Russian Star Trek would just be downright cool! XD

Now for some of my more whacky ideas. Could we have the beginnings of Thorium fueled nuclear power plants in the UIP? I am very sure this would be something the UIP would be looking into to help provide energy for the nation and decrease their reliance on coal - more so here than OTL I would think. So what do you think? And are we going to have the PAK-FA fighter jet made here too?

And I had one more important question to ask you, but I forgot lol. I think these should keep you occupied though. XD  Imp (Say Hi?!) 17:11, October 17, 2013 (UTC)

Map's... Map's good? WOOOOOOOOO

Well. I think time will tell with Ms because you never can't always be sure.

Yea, you've confused me now. What is the difference in tribal and normal then? Stupid question I know but I really am confused.

Oh, so almost all forms of joint exercises are out of question. I think at least some regional stuff will take place with say the KwaZulu and Lesotho and Volkstaat and GSWA. Well maybe once they manage to connect up their borders things might become more stable.

Well, the advantage of having me in control of the article and the fact that it is a stub and canonish at best means that can be changed. I'll just make it like Volkstaat, although I have a feeling they will still be overly friendly with the OFS.

So the same type of government for the OFS? Oh man, I had some high hopes to change the dynamics and get it spiced up with a war or something. I thought there still would be at least some international pressure. The ANZC and SAC are both close by in the RZA so maybe they could put some pressure? Or maybe just get New Britain to invade them, although things will be pretty equal unless NB's two allies join in too. They could depose the regime and pull out from international pressure, leaving the state to NUSA.

Well maybe that map can be fixed. They must be expanding in SA too, correct? After all, they do need to get closer to other AEC members. Plus, the must be one of the more stable and powerful nation's in the region, so maybe they explained more into Angola than what is already stated.

I might look into both of those things; religion and location. Perhaps one of them could make a great trek and spread the new faith. It would make for some interesting DD writing.

Ok, no thorium. But at least the PAK FA might become reality once the UIP and the Siberians become good enough allies and the tech is developed in a few years. On that note, can you contact Vlad in any manner? It would be useful being able to talk to him about the various ideas I have about stuff relating to his nation.

I REMEMBERED! I wanted to talk to you about Cricket. Seeing as to how all the pages relating to the former cricket playing nations hold 2013 in such high regard, why don't we have a World Cup. The ICC, which would probably be based in ANZC might decide to do so and sent the message to all those interested in playing. The West Indies this time will actually be one nation lol. I think it could work really well and it would be interesting.

Thoughts? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 01:18, October 19, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah! The only serious Cricket nation which got nuked was the Brits, and they weren't great lol, and the British nations might come together to make a team.


 * Actually, the Celts and all the remainder British nations are going to have their own individual teams - because that is what it says on the page. The world cup should become much more interesting - we have 7 teams from the Indian sub-continent alone. And Guns, the English are almost the world's best team - especially after the way India lost today. Canada is going to be sending their team too :D [[Image:1.png|23px]] Imp (Say Hi?!) 23:07, October 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * And... HOW many world cups have they won?
 * Let me see... India has won two, Same for the West Indies, the Aussies are at four, the Lankans and Pakistanis are at one each...
 * And the Pommies? Oh, that's right- NONE.

Just been a bit busy recently, lol.

I see, like the House of Commons and Lords. Interesting. Good, so KwaZulu is doing well in the current world then? If that is hopefully the case, it would be good for the area.

Waterboersland is closer to the OFS? Oh man. It will be way more than a touch mild. It will be liveable for blacks - I'm not making another OFS. If that was the case, then Waterboersland and OFS would have formed some sort of close political union between their nations.

Oh. Even though they fought a way against them? So they really cannot be bothered with the state - atleast in their current condition of power (which is not very powerful lol)? Well I do hope technology begins to move faster now, we need New Britain to get back to Britain and stabilise the remainder states. I got no problem with the Alliance, but I want the remaninder states to become much more united - with New Britain with them too.

I see. They have not expanded much in Angola at all. A war of the Soviet Kingdoms vs Botswana would be very interesting. Please tell me this could be on the cards? It would spice up the region and give the Botswanans more land to colonise - not to mention their policies toward the Angolans would be interesting. Do they try to incorporate them into their society and teach them english? Do they keep them as workers who will rebuild much of what has been left in resrepair? Or will they treat them like downright slaves? things like that lol.

That would be some interesting writing lol. "Follow Logic" would ahve to be their motto lol.

Oh, I might actually write up about the World Cup. It would be a good time to note that India won it in 1983 - before DD happened. Might want to inform Guns too, or he will not forgive me for letting this topic go. Do you think it will be held on the British Isles? I would probably think it would be held in ANZC territories lol. England are becoming pretty strong recently - as you said, its about time.

I see. I did think that technology would be behind, and the fact that the USSR needs more manpower. What happened to those 20 mil who were going to be assimilated to the USSR? I thought Vlad said that was going to happen in Central Asia or something. Which brings me to ask, can you contact Vlad in any way? He hasn't responded to my message, so...

I guess that is all lol. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 18:14, October 23, 2013 (UTC)

I see, more power to the House of Chieftons.

Was it? I might just go round to other articles on the area and see what they describe Waterboersland as. I hope its not too bad so I can make them mellow out more by the 21st century. Waterboersland being partially racist means the nation can be worked with - much better than the Cape ever could be worked with.

Well, with that analogy - I'm going to have to read up on those political parties now, lol. I know nothing of South African politics so that will have to be a bit of heavy reading.

I see. I was thinking more along the lines of a Royal Family thing where they all maybe get together and decide on an overall king or something. Although I would probably recommend this to happen when all the area in South Africa has been used up for expansion and when the OBN become much better intregated and can finally get round to providing for their citizens in a more effective manner.

Well then, better get those messages to the Botswanan creator flowing again - another adoption might be on the horizon. A nation to which something interesting can be added about. A lot of these articles have dates only upto 2009 or 2010, which gives me hope becuase there is a chance to fill out 3 more years of their history. And by native you meant the languages the people of the area spoke before the western powers imposed their own languages in the region?

I thought the ANZC could be the ones hosting it. Makes sense too - and by the time I start my article - it will be perfect for the sport - right in the middle of the Australian summer lol.Are all these teams going to be flying into Australia and New Zealand? The OBN nations could probably travel with the CA team in one commercial aircraft. The West Indians and others in the regions would probably do the same too. Although that makes me ask the question - would the name "West Indies" be changed to "East Indies" seeing asto how they are actually one nation now? Or would they more likely to be referred as the "East Carribean" team?

Vlad did say he had something planned for Central Asia or Aralia.

I did try the group and I didn't have all that much luck at all lol. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 14:37, October 24, 2013 (UTC)

Oh I see. That makes a lot more sense. However, it kinda makes sense for them to be in NUSA. The power might still lie in the hands of whites but they would still want to give off a good image to the rest of the world. They would definately have good links with OFS then.

Oh. Well eventually those royal families will begin to intermarry and will prbably give you an "overall" royal family which would make it harder for the republics to stay republics in the OBN. The area has had a monarchy ruling over it in some from for more than 2 millennia straight.

So NB stays in Africa? Oh man, that is a bit annoying. Well I want them to develop into a bigger power than NUSA - even though I run NUSA, and make them gain more land and become larger in terms of area too. Is there any way this is possible or not?

Ok. That makes Botswana's job easier. The adoption of that is below Mozambique and South Africa though so we may not see anything relating to the area yet. Me and Guns have pretty much taken over the area through adoption from the users who don't contribute anymore.

I see. Transportation can be easily sorted out then. Why not? Becuase they were known as the pre-DD and are still known as the West Indies today. But ok, ECF it is, with the team probably referred to more commonly as the East Caribbean.

That would have been interesting to read about. I would want to see what he came up with once Siberia had expanded into the region. The USSR being quiet just isn't really interesting lol.

Botswana growing to become a bigger power and being able to access fertile lands to establish new cities with, is however, a very interesting premise. The country finally has the chance to occupy fertile lands which will help boost its population and provide greater resources for the nation.

So yeah. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 22:11, October 27, 2013 (UTC)

Re: "Plagiarizing"
Really? I thought it was one of the more unspoken rules of the editing system: Don't copy others.

Anyway, if that is the way it is, then it is not my place to object. Only trying to maintain the wikia as I think the rules are.

"<font color="#AACC99">This is not your grave  but you are welcome in it. " 22:31, October 24, 2013 (UTC)

Ok, got it. I just thought is was best.

"<font color="#AACC99">This is not your grave  but you are welcome in it. " 14:48, October 26, 2013 (UTC)

Vandals
I hate to delete things but this one was obvious to the most casual observer.

BTW, I think most folks know how to spell "infrastructure" now :)

PS -To find out more about me - and see my picture - go to qrz.com and enter my amateur call sign K1ATV.

EoGuy (talk) 17:54, October 25, 2013 (UTC)

Bering Tunnel, Albania, and Transnistria
I know you've had a lot on your plate this week, so I do apologize if I'm bothering you at the moment (also if I'm sounding too pushy, I apologize for that as well).

It was turned down in New Union, but I've been thinking for years that it might work in Russian America. That being a tunnel across the Bering Strait (I wrote my thoughts on this a while back). Not sure what you'd make of it, but I understand if it's too implausible for this timeline.

I also had two additional questions involving Albania and Transnistria. Tiu asked me a few days ago about Albania, and what it would do without a communist China (since they ended up supporting them). My only thoughts would be that it may follow Yugoslavia and simply be a neutral communist state, but I'm considering the possibility that it becomes pro-Yugoslav. The ultimate outcome I can think of would be that Albania is admitted into Yugoslavia (I believe this was considered and there were already Albanians there to begin with). I also considered whether this could affect the internal structure of Yugoslavia to the point that some of the tensions within the nation would've been solved by the 1990s, leading to Yugoslavia remaining in tact to this day (Slovenia and all). I know this sounds optimistic, which is why I would like to see what you think. I'd be surprised if this actually worked, but I would definitely love to get your take on Albania in general.

The second question involved Transnistria. With the Ukraine now out of the picture, I'm still wondering what affects Rutskoy and Belarusian admission could do to the situation in Moldova. I've thought of some possibly outcomes I'd like to explore. Most involve Russia putting pressure on Moldova to let the region go, with them just ditching their losses. The most interesting idea I have may be to tack the region to the Ukraine (it used to be a part of it before the 1940s). Or possibly as likely, the region gains free association with Russia (which is what the regions seems to want), but I'm not sure how practical it could be to fully incorporate the region into Russia (Kaliningrad is one thing, but the PMR is another entirely). Or the more likely outcome could simply be that Russia recognizes the independence of the PMR, and it simply becomes ATL's Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

I would love to get your two cents on these ideas, and I look forward to your response. Thank you in advanced. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 01:16, October 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * Quite surprised to see you on so early.


 * Thanks for your input on the Bering Tunnel idea. The ferry idea may be interesting.


 * I thought I added it, but I was considering that Serbia would've allowed Kosovo to join Albania as part of Albania's merger. Though I'm not too sure how this could fix anything, and you are correct that this would worsen the Yugoslav Wars. Just out of curiosity, do you know of any way to keep Yugoslavia intact for this timeline. I've heard stuff about a successor to Tito (kinda like the Kims in North Korea), though I have no idea how this would be connected to the POD or Albania.


 * Worth a shot, thought the Ukraine idea was interesting. Not sure if I'll have Russia recognize them here, but like you said... not sure how this would differentiate from OTL. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:38, October 26, 2013 (UTC)

New York City vs ...
Hey, LG.

I was wondering if I could get your opinion on a topic regarding Britain's World? I've been trying to determine what city would be the largest in the Commonwealth of America; I believe New York City would still be the largest, but I'm not entirely sure. Would New York City still be the largest city in this TL's country, or would another city take its place?

Thanks Enclavehunter (talk) 03:09, October 26, 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks.

Also, would the government of the CoA choose a major city (such as Philadelphia, New York, etc.) for the capital; or would they create a federal district similiar to the District of Columbia? And what type of government would it most likely be. I was thinking something like Canada's government, but what do you think would be the best option for the Commonwealth? Enclavehunter (talk) 01:33, November 2, 2013 (UTC)

American Kingdom (1983: Doomsday)
I'm adopting the obsolete American Kingdom with the intent of turning it into a small survivor nation created by a man with an interest in Arthurian lore. I need a small town that'd be abandoned because of radiation, but that is able to be reinhabited some time later. Can you help me? Yank 16:23, October 26, 2013 (UTC)

Buffalo question
How's it going. I've been cleaning up Venusian Haven and I plan on updating the map a bit. Not sure if I'm remembering this correctly, I think I remember you wanted your settlement to have been on an island or something? Since I'm going to be redoing the map, I thought I would move your state to where you wanted it initially. Any thoughts? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 22:55, October 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * I have a new idea involving the British and the Commonwealth Realm, and Metis Regio (your first choice) seems to be a nice fit (also I just realized... "Metis"). Also, glad to see you like my Scientology state. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:56, November 9, 2013 (UTC)

Too coincidental, but it's in the eye of the beholder I guess.

Well it was interesting enough for you to comment on. But glad to see its workable. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 04:46, November 10, 2013 (UTC)


 * Lol. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 15:37, November 13, 2013 (UTC)

Just to let you know (not that its major), I'm going to be making Metis Regio canon as of now. I will upload an updated map some point this week. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:56, November 14, 2013 (UTC)


 * Glad to hear it. -- 02:02, November 28, 2013 (UTC)

^_^ -- 02:38, November 30, 2013 (UTC)

Might Seem Brusque
Saint Joesph, Missouri; hit or not?

Kudos if you can figure out why.

The Mighty Guns is too Glorious (or lazy) to go to source mode and type out his real sig <font color="#000000">(Dammit, Guns!)  23:44, October 29, 2013 (UTC)

Ooh, also, Do you think it would be plausible to have a pirate base off the coast of the OTL Congo, preying on shipments from the WAU?

The Mighty Guns is too Glorious (or lazy) to go to source mode and type out his real sig <font color="#000000">(Dammit, Guns!)  22:00, October 30, 2013 (UTC)

Ooh, pity.

Imp asked me to find out if Eminem or Tupac survived DD. Tupac's dead, of course; was in NY.

The Mighty Guns is too Glorious (or lazy) to go to source mode and type out his real sig <font color="#000000">(Dammit, Guns!)   21:08, October 31, 2013 (UTC)

Doctah?
I was thinking about things that would be brought back after Doomsday in the way of television. I'm not sure if you're a Doctor Who fan, but I thought it would be cool to bring that show back (especially since the Time War could be considered similar to Doomsday). I'm completely sure this is plausible since a lot of other things are being brought back, but I figured I run this idea by you first.

Along that line, I noticed that, on the maps of the UK for 1983, Exeter is unclaimed and unscathed by nuclear weapons. It isn't mentioned in any articles except for the UK article that says 'Exeter is in Devon'. It seems like Exeter should be of more importance even if it is just a city state (my original idea was to have a survivor state in a castle, so this isn't some mad quest for power). All sources but one point to it being unclaimed: the Celtic Alliance map. This map says that the entirety of Devon is claimed. The majority of the maps seem to point to Exeter being unclaimed. Which map should I trust? CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes" 00:38, October 31, 2013 (UTC)

Awesome. I look forward to seeing what I can do with the Doctor. Thank you for getting back to me regarding Exeter by the way. Do you think a town in Northern Norfolk (maybe Cromer or Baconsthorpe) could spawn a community? CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes" 14:54, October 31, 2013 (UTC)

That makes sense. Thank you for the guidance on getting this started. Perhaps Cleveland or Northumbria could host it (if I can get in touch with their caretakers) and the BBC/Whatever channel is carrying Doctor Who after Doomsday would be a cooperative network between the various British nations. CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes" 16:12, November 1, 2013 (UTC)

​Regroupement des Gevaudan
Can I add to it a little? Just some minor stuff, vehicles and stuff

If you don't mind me asking, have you made any timelines? Some people said you haven't...

Adopting No Islam
Hi Lord ganon, I was wondering if I can adopt No Islam as the user's last post on it was about a month ago, and i had shown interest on adopting it previously however i wanted to first see if there was a more active posting on it, So i was wondering if i would be allowed to Adopt the timeline.

I hope you allow me to adopt the timeline, and thanks in advance

Sine dei gloriem &#34;Ex Initio Terrae&#34; (talk) 21:37, November 2, 2013 (UTC)

PD:Would you like to see if this timeline is still biased, Stronger latinoamerica I'm trying to make it plausible.

1983: Doomsday - Trance
Hello.

I was wondering if the music genre of Trance could still be created. When I looked up the genre again, I found that the original melodic trance sound was first heard in 1993, in Frankfurt (which the city in TTL had been destroyed). Could it be possible for it to develop elsewhere in this case?

If so, I was thinking about creating some articles of Trance musicians, like, , and , along with some sort of Trance Radio show (something like in OTL) as well, if it's okay. Of course with the Radio show, it would probably be limited and there would probably be a few of them in their own areas (like one for the Celtic Alliance, one for Scandinavia, etc.) -Kogasa  2013 November 07, 05:50 (CET)

How about some kind of variation of Synthpop? Synthpop had developed in 1977-1980 (originally from Germany, Japan, and United Kingdom). Maybe after a while, some aspects that inspired it (,, , and ), could be thrown out and establish some kind of mostly electronic music? I think it could remind a bit like Trance, but would be mostly different from it. Though it would have to develop elsewhere, since the three countries it originated from could probably not create it. -Kogasa  2013 November 07, 22:58 (CET)

Fair enough. So I can have it develop in Australia then? Also when it catches on, would it remain popular only in Oceania or could it spread to a few other areas, like South America?

Seeing as it probably won't make it to Europe for a long time, what can I do with some of the OTL Trance artists that survived? Could I write that they become artists for other music (like Ørjan Nilsen could create some kind of Norwegian Rock band) instead? -Kogasa  2013 November 09, 20:55 (CET)

Help......
Hey LG in a map game can I give some of economy scores to another country?

Rcchang (talk) 09:28, November 7, 2013 (UTC)

Commonwealth of Susquehanna
Hey LG, other than the few fixes u said about, how is the page? Thanks. Daeseunglim (talk) 12:29, November 7, 2013 (UTC)

Ok, so I got rid of 1 of the colleges. The technical school is an alternative high school. I figure that actually post doomsday it would be more successful due to the need for people who could build things and fix things. It teaches wielding, carpentry, wood work, plumbing, electrical, HVAC, and things like that. I was planning on keeping it. Daeseunglim (talk) 16:36, November 7, 2013 (UTC)

The unexpected Kingdom ASB bias tag
Hey im just curious why you labeled The Unexpected kingdom with a Bias tag, im not offended or anything and i dont really mind just cause as Plausible as some things were i just started having fun with it. But regardless i was just curious why you labelled it as such, didnt want to be in the Dark about it. (Ive been told it was the European Federation which your staunchly against a sort of fully Federalized or Unified Europe)

Was just curious let me know when you get the Chance. The Unchallenged Conqueror #FP (Talk to Me) 20:24, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

Fall of China
im looking to include in my timeline a large scale rebellion amongst the non manchu popolation in china in the 1850's 1860's. however im not sure if its plausible. im planning on having a large scale revolution not tied down to the teiping rebellion (which doesn't happen in the timeline). What id like to know is if ethnic han generals and aristocrats would have eventually joined the rebellion since it was not based on the unique ideals of the taiping revolt, and was uch more of an anti-manchu group based on restoring the mandate of heaven to ethnic chinese.

my largest thoughts are on if its plausible or not.

thaanks in advance for the help.Nkbeeching (talk) 14:20, November 9, 2013 (UTC)

would the new chinese state face the same problems as otl late qing dynasty. im planning on having serious problems develop between the han population and the minorities in china. Along with a conflict similar to OTL where chinese politics is deeply divided between reformists annd reactionaries, this is to lead to a similar fate as OTL but with different reprecussions in the early 20th century (still havent decided what they will be though).

oh yeah another quickk question that has nothing to do with my timelines, but with a curiousity, could the Qin dynasty have survived longer then OTL if it had not faced so much internal squabbles? Nkbeeching (talk) 15:37, November 9, 2013 (UTC)

thanks for the info, and im not talking about the qing dynasty surviving but rather the qin dynasty. Yeah thats what i thought, probably a sino-japanese war happening in the 1880's instead of the 1890's and im guessing a much more intense scramble for influence in china and the Japanese exerting something of a perminent influence over manchuria forcing an earlier break. not sure though, but i was thinking of China becoming an extremely militaristic state in the 1930s aiming at restoring chinese pride and unity, upon it's defeat it would become two states one a free republic relatively free, and the other undecided yet, either communist or a japanese puppet state under the post revolutionary monarchy.Nkbeeching (talk) 17:50, November 9, 2013 (UTC)

um ok so a japanese puppet in the 40 onward and they control only the coastline for the most part with rebels in the interior?

sldo in my timeline i have the americans focusing  on the british mainly with cubs already under their control, it would be japan that pounce on the Spainsh in the philippines right? and thanks for the info.

one thing though who would become the new emperor i was thinking  Zhang Lexing of the Nien Rebellion but then would the other rebel groups accept him thats why im asking. Nkbeeching (talk) 12:32, November 13, 2013 (UTC)

ok so who would probably take his place, or would be welcoming a chinese republic early on though with no real internal stability?

would some no name noble from the south or one of the chinese generals due?

heres an interesting idea. could the house of confucios the holy dukes of yen be placed on the throne?

could Li Hongzhang or Yuan Jiasan ? they were some of the best generals at the time and were against Shang. i honestly cant think of anyone else. Yuan Jiasan was alos influential in the 1860's until his death. Nkbeeching (talk) 17:03, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Another one i have come across is Zenf Goufan. those are the three best choices i can find.

well im not really sure. the situation is alot more complicated in the timeline, i have the manchu having largely fled southern china after Zhang takes Beijing and has proclaimed himself emperor. The Southern Allaince which is han rebels are against that and the leadership is largely split in the south between Li, Yuan, and Zeng. once the Nien forces have been defeated im planning on having on of the three take control, most likely with the rebels pushing their leader into into the position and a compromise to avoid further bloodshed. i honestly would see the chinese choosing Zeng over the other two. ill see what i do later now im focusing on how im going to arm europe and the americas in  the 1870's in the timeline.

thanks for the help. Nkbeeching (talk) 11:52, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

another choice though im not really sure could be Zhu Hongzhang who apparetly bore the same name as the old ming emperor's. again i dont know about this one but it could be an option. Nkbeeching (talk) 12:05, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

alright ill be reformulating the chinese civil war then and start it from scratch T.T. but i want it to work so thanks again.Nkbeeching (talk) 12:42, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

RE: TUK
Alright thanks, i actually thought their resources was pretty decently ok but its fine, ill just stick to whatever, i dont really mind, its fun. Thanks though i dont mind all too much The Unchallenged Conqueror #FP (Talk to Me)

RE: TUK
well i was just kind of having fun with it, it wasnt about the plausibility, and i think with people like Imp, MS and the like (who were interested) i may open this up to the community eventually. Im also more or less uncaring because its not worth getting mad over the ASB-Bias tag because you know... its just Bias and thats kind of hard to get rid of or control without multiple parties providing an overwatch. Im also going to reference Sundered Veil, because im pretty sure thats ASB and its still one of the Best on the Wiki. So im none to concerned.

Thanks for the Explanation, if you dont mind if i stray too much further into ASB-land or into another ASB tag let me know cause id rather avoid the second one. The Unchallenged Conqueror #FP (Talk to Me) 15:08, November 9, 2013 (UTC)

Hello LG,

TheMarxist is spam-editting on 1983:doomsday and his talkpage and several other pages! He is also badge hunting! Please give him a warning or something.

Rcchang (talk) 14:25, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the badge. I'll due my best to fulfill my responsibilities. Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 18:35, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

Chat Admins
Hey LG. Seeing the growing popularity of chat - I have realised that the few number of us chat mods there is cannot cover chat for long enough. SO I propose making Feud, Local and Scraw all chat mods. They have proven to be good on chat and respectable wiki users overall. So do you object? Imp (Say Hi?!) 23:38, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

What he said. Really, sometimes, chat is just a bunch of people trying to outspam each other. I've even seen dead baby jokes.

The Mighty Guns is too Glorious (or lazy) to go to source mode and type out his real sig  (Dammit, Guns!)  00:06, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

I laughed so hard. Nice try, Guns.

CrimsonAssassin - "I have special eyes"   00:29, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Real smooth with the last one there Guns XD

I see. Well i am fine with that. That does allow for more chat admins anyway so it does accomplish the goal. Thank you. :)  Imp (Say Hi?!) 15:48, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Well, I did see them guys. Just because I cracked them doesn't make it any better xD.

The Mighty Guns is too Glorious (or lazy) to go to source mode and type out his real sig  (Dammit, Guns!)   21:45, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Hey lordganon- someone's playing double player!
I'm playing a game called colonial world and I highly suspect that the person- "The Pacific Communist" is playing Savoy and Korea at the same time! Every time Savoy asks Koreas some crazy things, Korea always agrees and just yesterday, Savoy asks a army score of 0.5 for free and Korea gave it right away. Furthermore, everytime time Savoy posts something asks Korea something, Korea almost always post next! The person playing Korea is called "Bio war" and I hope you could see it as my point of view.

Captainjohnrex (talk) 01:48, November 16, 2013 (UTC)

Nuclear War
Hey LG. Besides the Cuban Missile Crisis and the brief incident in 1983, are there any other POD that could lead to nuclear war between the United States and Soviet Union? Enclavehunter (talk) 19:41, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Wittelsbacher World again
Hey LG,

You may recall my idea of (I think) earlier this year, where the Wittelsbach family managed to keep Bavaria an independent kingdom until the present day, and --by having Prince Carl Theodore elected King of Greece instead of Otto-- keep the Greek throne in the family until at least WWI.

I've been thinking about ways the Wittelsbachs could feasibly gain more crowns, and I thought of Spain in 1870. My idea is that Prince Adalbert --the son of King Ludwig I who married a Spanish noblewoman (granddaughter of King Charles IV of Spain) in 1856-- would be chosen King instead of Amadeus. I admit it seems a bit far-fetched, but I think there are substantial reasons he could potentially have been chosen. I mean, he is of very royal blood, and through his wife is quite closely related to the Spanish Royal family (his children had Spanish royal blood). Added to that, he has the advantage of not being Prussian (avoiding the ire of France), and of being Catholic.

So what do you think? Is it just too far-fetched? Hope to hear your opinion, Callumthered (talk) 00:04, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Fair enough, thanks Callumthered (talk) 20:38, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

Is there a problem?
I have not received a list of entries since yesterday afternoon.

I usually have lots of them that come in overnight.

Is there a problem?

EoGuy (talk) 02:16, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

I'm no longer receiving emails from this site.

I wonder why not?

EoGuy (talk) 10:28, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

Mediator
I'm not too sure about what you and Ms are fighting about, but it really needs to stop. I haven't really seen a compromise at all from either side. Maybe you guys have tried to compromise and it didn't work out. But I'm pretty tired of hearing about it on chat and on the TSPTF page. If you guys can't come to an agreement, maybe an impartial mediator (someone that you and MS both trust) would come in handy to settle whatever dispute you have with Ms. Do you have any thoughts on the matter of a mediator being brought in. CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes" 23:29, November 22, 2013 (UTC)

Hello Lordganon,

I want to help contribute to the 1983 Doomsday article, can you give me a few tips on how to start and how I can help?

Rcchang (talk)

It's been almost a week and we've gotten no reply from you. I was hoping we could begin the mediation as soon reply. Please let us know. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 14:53, November 28, 2013 (UTC)

Just so you know, Crimson approached me on the issue, and said that you weren't acting "admin-like". I never "start in" on him. I honestly still think we can reach some sort of compromise if we both agree to have a civil and mature conversation. Is there no way we can talk somehow without insults or other hostile behavior? I know you've said that you've attempted to compromise before, but in reality whenever I brought up an issue you were quick to defend youself, not solve the issue. Every mediation is halted by you rejecting me/my issue, not the compromise itself. Please consider what I've said. Thanks. Mscoree (talk) 16:18, November 29, 2013 (UTC) P.S., on a completely unrelated note, mind adding this to the main page?

Message from RC
Hi LG!

Hey I have two things to tell you.

First, I would like to contribute to 1983:Doomsday, how can I help? Can you give me an intro or something?

Second, my good friend TheMarxist was blocked two weeks ago because he spam editted or something. Well, he told me in real life that he was terribly sorry he did that and wouldn't do that again. He really loves history and wishes to get back on the wiki. Can you unblock him?

Thanks. Rcchang (talk)

UNBAN ME!!!!!
YOU LOUSY [expletive deleted]!!! Get that moron to unban me please, unless you want a punch in the face.Ratc3333 Here, Prepare for Combat (talk) 11:15, November 25, 2013 (UTC)

Look LG crim pretty much banned ract for no reason, he has a bad temper and was banned like me for trying to shut a cyber bulling story down, which ract and i felt was a little to much. <font color=Purple face="Algerian">OCT MARIUS, HAIL HIM

Hungary Splitting from Austria
wp¡ould this be plausible giving it won a war or would Hungary accept otl reforms im not sure honestly and i originally had Austria and Hungary splitting iin the timeline  but im thinking of changing this before i move forward with the timeline.

Also what would a good name for Zhu's new dynasty be, would he assume the ming title or change it? Nkbeeching (talk) 11:01, November 28, 2013 (UTC)

ok thanks for thw help then they wont be accepting reforms basicly the situation is that the hungarians revolted during a war against italy and prussia, atl conditions not otl, so ill have them seperate while austria over the next 40 years falls into a suborbinate position to germany, until after the first world war were revolutions scorch eastern europe and in the aftermath germany forces an annexation on austria. again alternate timeline conditions.

you input has been quite helpful for my timelines despite not being finished XD

what would a good name be because honestly i have no idea ive thought about a few but have no idea. Nkbeeching (talk) 19:01, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

well the timeline takes place alot earlier it is the napoleon divergence timeline The Disaster of 1805, basicly prussia entered the 3rd coalition but they still lose though France doesnt push so far east, russia became disinterested in the napoleonic wars without him being a direct threat to russia, and focuses on crushing the ottomans, i had the napoleonic empire falter in the 1810s and austria and prussia regaining most of the pre war areas with the exception of Wallonia, switzerland and Kingdom of Italy without veneto which returns to austria. from their france nd the other great powers compete against one another eventually leading to the great european war were Napoleon II invades central europe in the 1840s to try and reclaim the full extent of his father's legacy, which will ultimately lead to the complete destruction of napoleonic power in the early 1850s and the rise of Prussia to centerfold in continental europe were they go to war with Austria in 1855 defeating them with italy (not all of italy, just Napoleonic ar,ea of italy which defected near the end of the war minus piedmont and sicily which it absorbes some years later) allied to them and the hungarians rebels which take advantage of the situation to try and break free from Austria after years of broken promises and reppression. Germany eventually unifies in 1867 after another brief war with france and thats were ive gotten to in europe.

the great war greatly destabalized china and japan due to incidents which had effects on them such as a french raid on the dutch trading post of Dejima using the spanish east indies as a place of operations also looting parts of the city around the trading post causing a similar effect to Parry's visit to japan otl sparking the bakumatsu and an imperial restoration though one dead set on securing its southern border at all costs which will put it on the eventually war course with Spain, france and the other european powers in the 20th century. In China the growth of western infuence in southern china and the already present discontent with the Manchu sparked a major revolt in 1852-4 which is still going on were i am in the timeline which is 1867, the southern rebels have absorbed nien forces after the death of Zhang and major ethnic violence is tearing the eempire to pieces as the european powers begin picking at the collapsing empire like russia taking otl outer manchuria. there is no clear leadership to the rebels in the south and i plan on having conflcits arise in the 70's which will lead to zhu becoming the emperor atleast until the loss of the first sino japanese war.

one other point i have france having controled wallonia for many years while flanders was owned by Netherlands, after the defeat of france in the 50's would Flanders and wallonia become a seperate bulguim which plays a role like otl or would it be completely absorbed into the netherlands? the timeline has some loss ends i need to clean up and plan on doing so before i move on.

Nkbeeching (talk) 15:53, November 30, 2013 (UTC)

there are also some changes in the americas with argetina falling under the sway of the unitarians instead of the federalists and eventually going to war with brazil for control over Uruguay losing with uruguay and paraguay falling under the sway of brazil and argentina muddling for a few years until it falls under the sway of General roca who remains in power either directly or indirectly until the early 1900's. Vice royalty of new spain become the kingdom of new spain and eventually empire of Mexico after a series of events in the 1820's when the spanish bourbons move to mexicoo when they see spain is under french dominance. The Usa still wins the civil war with only some alterations to the way the war plays out but lincoln isnt killed and the usa movves down a very moderate reconstruction with the republican party splitting bwetween lincolns supporters and the radicals who become the reformist party who at the start have a very narrow platform based on black rights but will eventually evolve into something like a soocialist party based on racia equality and workers rights in the late 19th century, while the democrats remain in power for the remainder of the 19th century, a sort of gentleman's racism settles northern society towards non-whites while blacks remain largely second class citizens in the south. tensions between the usa and britain remain high due to a series of incidents like the usa chipping away at the Empire of mexico ( otl territorial gains plus cuba not anything else) which conflicts with british interests. i plan on having the usa and britain go to war in the 1880s or 1890s as relations continue to sour with the british winning nd the usa becoming more aligned with british rival germany who grows apart from their old ally due to expansionist and naval ambitions of the germans. And Gran colombia remains united after a civil war in the 1830s which secured a victory for the followers of santander with new granada being the centre of the federal state, however i aln on having the state fall into another civil war as venezuelans tred of colombian dominance try to gain power or independence backed by the british while the central government is backed by the americans. Nkbeeching (talk) 16:10, November 30, 2013 (UTC)

all input on the timeline is welcome if parts are implausible there is no trouble as i have plenty of ideas for the timeline to balance it out and adjust the parts that are necesary. Nkbeeching (talk) 16:15, November 30, 2013 (UTC)

haha ok will do i still am used to writing in spanish all the time they use long paragraphs in general so i kinda am fixed with that. um but my main problem would be whats the dynasty? would it be zhu dynasty? Nkbeeching (talk) 20:09, November 30, 2013 (UTC)

well i guess i really need to improve both my languages then XD.

well like i said he will probably asume power after fighting in the 1870's. no idea the message but i guess they will be trying to restore han chinese pride and restore the power of the chinese empire by trying but failing to expel the western powers. i believe at this point they would absndon the whole mandate of heaven unless the group si extremely reactionary.

aright thanks.

Commonwealth of Susquehanna
Hey, LG: I saw u put on my talk page pop was too big. What do u think the pop should be, and is there anything else u want me to change, or is it ready for canon? Daeseunglim (talk) 14:36, November 28, 2013 (UTC)

Ok: the population so about 15,000? And the internal division is for simplicity for law enforcement and the census taking. They do not act like states in the USA, they act like internal subdivisions for emergency services and power service. Daeseunglim (talk) 17:03, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

Human History Experiment Maps
Please refrain from removing all the categories from the Human History Experiment's maps and adding the tag "images". It's basically just making more work for the map game moderators. Those images are by definition maps, since they are geographic diagrams. Furthermore they are even listed in a page called "Maps (Human History Experiment Map Game)", and are viewed as the official "map" on the main page. Even if you think that they aren't maps "imo", that's your opinion, and doesn't warrant you the right to change their tags to get more edits at the game's expense. Thank you. Mscoree (talk) 00:01, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

Would you mind explaining to me why those images are not maps? Mscoree (talk) 16:07, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

I'd like to apologize for categorizing those map things. I honestly though they were maps, but I now know that they are not. Anyway, I am truly sorry. Hopefully this does not come between us and a successful resolution to our dispute.

Speaking of which, many people have voiced their opinion saying that a mediator isn't necessary since I should be mature enough to solve my own problems. In that case, would you care to chat something (on the wiki or other) about this? Let me know. Mscoree (talk) 20:44, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

I kind of had a feeling that Ms was getting ahead of himself with that matter. Imp and I warned him not to get cocky. CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes" 13:44, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

Emotions aren't Real
We only have a dispute if we believe we have a dispute, and I do not. I honestly thought we had something special going when we were able to talk calmly and work together on something. Mscoree (talk) 15:36, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Q
Really? :( Bad thing. Thanks for tell me about it. --Katholico (talk) 16:32, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey LG, it's Dae. Ok, I saw ur comments on CoS in DD:1983z thank u for your corrective criticism and help with this ongoing project. Some points I will address:
 * 1. I cut the number of stations to two. One AM station government run, and one FM station privately run. Gov only runs news, gov info, stuff like that. Private one runs music, sports, news, etc. I figured that might work better.
 * 2. I might have forgotten to change the counties early, but I might have changed them and forgotten I did…lol! Ok, so I changed the county thing that they were not used except for election purposes, almost like otl Congressional districts (minus the gerrymandering). Tell me if u r ok with that, if not I will remove that too.
 * 3. I was using the label Torrington Government to show the difference in opinion towards the new USA and the old USA that dissolved in Canberra. I will change it if u feel it is unnecessary.
 * 4. Newspaper: I said that originally the Danville News (An actual newspaper in my town) merged with the Morning Press (former newspaper) to form the Press Enterprise (Bloom based Newspaper, otl) because of budget issues. I hope that is ok.
 * 5. I get the Wilks- Barre thing, I just thought that would be cool. So I changed it to the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station. Hope that's ok.
 * 6. U saying that they are poor and backwater: I understand where you r coming from, but wouldn't they be getting money from selling steel?

Thank u for all your help! Daeseunglim (talk) 21:13, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

Mscoree's posts
Well, it seems the problem is not really solved yet. If is that so, that's mean Mscoree sent me the messages only to gain the sympathy from me and to make me breaking my own neutrality over this issue? FirstStooge (talk) 11:13, December 4, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Warning
My bad, the situation was getting a bit sensitive and regardless of the behaviour what needed to be done has now been started in a much more civilized fashion. Me Local and Imp managed to hop on chat and talk out a large majority of those issues. Thanks for the warning though ill tone it down. My bad once again The Unchallenged Conqueror #FP (Talk to Me)

Well interestingly enough i do appreciate your concern and whatnot for the process. Im wont hate you for doing your job thats like going to the DMV and telling the lady who just told me to go from the Yellow line to the Red line to go screw herself. But thats kind of besides the point, as it stands my little outburst (while improper once again ill admit my problem on that) has essentially started a much better streamlined process in which details while not totally solid and ironed out can be considered and worked on instead of being stuck in a conceptionary stage like we were with Britannia and the Pacific war Respectively. It seems to be a much better situation going on with the TL now cause we managed to get some fully fleshed out parts and then nit-pick from there instead of everyone trying to impress their will on an article not written yet

Thanks again its appreciated and ill try to be more contained from now on but i think weve got the issues settled and we can make the process much easier now. The Unchallenged Conqueror #FP (Talk to Me)

Alright thats not a problem sorry again The Unchallenged Conqueror #FP (Talk to Me)

bonapartes and italy
alright i wasnt quite sure how to deal with the bonapartes so i just put that i originally planned on them return to power in thee 1880s and trying to retore french power abroad until the this tl equivilant of the first world war, bu i wasnt sure if the populace would accept that thats why i simply had them stripped of titles etc. ill change it to them going into exile then coming back in politica lturbulant 70's and fixing relations with the british during the 1890's and early 1900's as Germaany becomes the biggest threat to british interests abroad.

another point would flanders and wallonia remain part of the netherlands or eventually look for independence with french and britissh support.

final point will do the adjustments to the kingdom of italy and piedmont, is the situation plausible in the italian peninsula, and if so what would be giving to the italians, i cant see the austrians allowing them veneto that why i had that very uncertain situation in veneto which lead to italy joining the prussians in fighting the austrians, i have no idea corsica is a no aand i cant see any other areas of expansion, i guess just the beauharnias remaining as the king of italy and its continued survival ? i also planned a war between france and italy in the later part of the 19th century for control of Tunisia and france winning taking  tunisia along with areas of Piedment and Savoy making italy join the German faction in the world war to come.

Nkbeeching (talk) 22:01, December 6, 2013 (UTC)

while im in canada over the holidays i will be adjusting my timelines to improve grammer, context and the way i lay them out.Nkbeeching (talk) 23:06, December 6, 2013 (UTC)

um alright but im not actually having pied mont go to war with france, im having Italy go to war with them, in the timeline italy unites around the same time as otl with piedmont and sicily attacking italy out of fear and ultimately being absorbed into it lwading to a united italy.

alright.Nkbeeching (talk) 09:47, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

alright, but wouldn't italian nationalism push for the full unidication by the 20th century, if not i can use the kingdom of italy as an ally of the germans while piedmont and sicily align with the french and english, for control of the whole peninsulaNkbeeching (talk) 13:34, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

um alirght well ill re do parts of the 1843-1867 part to reacomodate this, but most likely youd have italy in one camp and the other two kingdoms on the other side in the world war right? um is the whole repunlican party splitting any good? with the government taking less radical steps the party might split im not sure but thats what i believe, though not sure.Nkbeeching (talk) 15:15, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

well veneto is already under the kingdom of italy following the end of Prussian-Austrian war. um ok so basicly you could have the three italian kingdoms fighting alongside each other against lets say france and britain in  the world war?

i have the kingdom of italy as an ally of germany and britain and germany distancing themselves in the 1880s 1890s as germany becomes increasingly aggresive in its foriegn policy, same as otl that point. The americans who had a problem with the british already and fighting in brief war with them on oh ill think of something so many points in the timeline to choose from will eventually align itself with Germany as well.

no not otl. in the timeline i have lincoln not dying since there is no assasination attempt (ATL situation) and he eventually agrees to a much less aggresive reconstruction whiich alienates him with the radicals within the republican party who will split off to form a progressive reformist party with a narrow platform ut will eventually evolve into a proto-socialist platform as they begin to expand from racial equality to include workers rights, and other domestic subjects in the late 19th century early 20th, while the deomocrats will remain with the same economic policy but add to their program a more nationalistic tone to help heal wounds with the south, in the face of rising tensions with britain and other countries. Nkbeeching (talk) 16:20, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

um alright then ill have to do quite a few changes, i havent had the usa allying with anyone yet i was planning on having them align  with germany, not ally but be alot omre sympathetic to germany as another country being "contained" by the old powers.

alright then the peninsula remaaining out of the war as whole? that would leave a second french empire and britain against Germany, austria, hungary and i guess the ottomans like otl until later when relations when the usa and britain reach breaking point and fight over something to do with mexico or gran colombia.

um well would the black situation be generally worse with more moderate recconstruction and allowing the south to largely preserve their culture? or would it be best to simply split the usa and the confederacy with the british fully aiding the confederacy. i originally thought about it but I do have some reservations about doing this since it would be very very similar to harry turtle dove's southern victory, and i dont particularly like copying off of other peoples works, though it would save me alot of trouble and allow me to be much freer with the way  i handle the timeline. Nkbeeching (talk) 16:57, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

um alright i personally was hoping to have the americans close to the germans. would it be copying to have the confederates independent and the Usa aligning with the germans ? i have most of the world situation differnt but that part was a constant stumper for me. at worst ill go with something else, but i had that in mind not a massive usa but with a complicated 20th century. Nkbeeching (talk) 17:13, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

not so much an american intervention as a splitting of british interests across several fronts including the atlantic. i have been looking for a way to get the americans closer to the germans so i will most likely be redoing parts of the 1843-1867 part since i find the prospect more and more interesting i will have the usa and confederates split ill just need to find a decent turn of events to do so.

one last thing would the bonapartes be able to retake power in the late 1870's or the 1880's?

Nkbeeching (talk) 15:10, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

um alright i know its impossible for the confederates to win alone ive always believed and accepted that. the thing is ive had the british supporting the confedeartes from the start with everything short of armed intervention if they entered the war would it be a confederate victory? reason  they are supporting is because of their almost bellicious relations with the british over the american annexation of the republic of california after the discovery of gold there which put them at odds with the british.

Um what mexican event? i already have the british helping The bourbon corwn restore power there (the mexican crown was establish after the royal family fled europe with bonapartist spain being established)  the french ceased after they were ingulfed in war with the prussians which left them lost and the french kingdom unstable ill be gonig with  second french republic or a second french empire after the world economy goes to hell forcing the bourbons off the frenc thone once and for all, the side that doesn't take power will do so after france faces defeat in the great war and from their on becoming a reactionary and revanchist state.

like i said ill be seeing what i do with the timeline in this part as it has a lot of flaws which i have been seeing over the last few weeks when im in canada ill have the time to look over them and improve the timeline as a whole.Nkbeeching (talk) 15:59, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

i was thinking armed intervention but like i said ill be working on that after christmas. im not saying they will intervene because of california but rather because of fear of continued american expansionism.

oh i konw they would be unpopular in mexico, but thats a minor note. it is similar to otl with the british trynig to prop up as many blocks in the way of american hegemony and to keep mexico fro defaulting on its debt, the french support them as well but to a minor degree and the support will end after they face defeat at the hands of prussia. alright so basicly, bourbons after the great war (1843-1852) bonapartes again until the end of the first world war then bourbons again? i guess after the are crushed a final time in the second world war they will become a socialist type republic completely disenchnted with militarism ?

Nkbeeching (talk) 13:13, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

ah ok well ill find out how to incoperate the britsih somwhow i actually have my mind set on it now, though i want to do it in a plaussble manner it would definately add the flare and messed up politics ive been looking for in the timeline in the americas, though it will take me a while.

question with the world powers after the second world war being of largely belligrant nature we can expect a brutal modern times for the timeline right, even more so then on otl scale?Nkbeeching (talk) 15:15, December 17, 2013 (UTC

scratch last message will think iwhat ill do, dont want to push things into a awy completely that it becomes in coherent ill see how things go with the work. Nkbeeching (talk) 15:33, December 17, 2013 (UTC)

alright well like i sstated before ill see how things turn out .Nkbeeching (talk) 18:26, December 18, 2013 (UTC)

Morgan Freeman
Why can't I have my signature say "Morgan Freeman?" Morgan Freeman (talk) 04:02, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

Happy? Arguably Morgan Freeman (talk) 04:28, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

Does this work? This Would Say &#34;Morgan Freeman&#34; but Lordganon Told Me That That Goes Against the Rules. This is Daxus Inferno, By The Way (talk) 05:46, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Is that a yes or a no? This Would Say &#34;Morgan Freeman&#34; but Lordganon Told Me That That Goes Against the Rules. This is Daxus Inferno, By The Way (talk) 07:09, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

I'll change it, but out of curiousity, what rule(s) does my current sig violate? This Would Say &#34;Morgan Freeman&#34; but Lordganon Told Me That That Goes Against the Rules. This is Daxus Inferno, By The Way (talk) 19:37, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Canada (Cinco De Mayo)
Hey Lord,

Since you're Canadian (originally), would you mind looking over some of my articles on Canada for Cinco De Mayo? I want to make sure it all looks "reasonable." Also, do you think Chrétien could have survived as Prime Minister if Quebec broke off in 1995, or would he have resigned then and there?

KingSweden (talk) 21:03, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

My thinking on Quebec ATL was that it would be along the lines of Czechoslovakia peacefully breaking up into the Czech Republic and Slovakia - I think I mention somewhere that Mulroney agreed to hold the referendum before his government fell in 1994, even. Though I suppose Chrétien would resign after such a high-profile defeat and could be replaced by Collenette, maybe? Or Graham? I want to save Paul Martin for the Presidency as he is already set up.

As for the takeover of Communism, my idea was that there would be a lengthy civil war starting in 1919 with the Winnipeg General Strike and then culminating in the 1926 Drummondville Agreement, sort of like the Russian Civil War where the Reds didn't win immediately.

KingSweden (talk) 17:22, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Well, I'm certainly going to have to rethink the Quebec referendum fallout then :P thanks for the tips. I think I'll have Collenette returned with a minority government in 1997 and then resign sometime after the 2003 elections. Still think I'm going to go with the right-wing parties failing to cobble together a big enough majority until the mid-2000s, since I'm going to have the left mostly support the liberals with the Social Democrats (NDP) not yet recovered from the fall of communism. Definitely scrapping Chrétien as a long-serving PM, though, and I think there's going to have to be some violence in Québec after independence.

KingSweden (talk) 02:29, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Afraid
What do you suggest me to do then? Delete it? What do you mean "derivative" work? I'ts not that I copy characters or exact names, is it? I know maybe I should be more original, but is what I did really that bad? And I even did some effort to find an unique symbol and the rest of my timeline doesn't really seem that unoriginal, does it? After all, a peacekeeping, mystical organization somewhere in the universe doesn't seem that implausible to me? And I can't think of anything else. I'm not trying to be offensive, I'm just trying to create a timeline with something more than just nations and people with flags and pictures. Please don't ban me, this wiki is one of my favourite activities, I'm getting quite afraid that you will ban me if I'm rude. Also what does "GE" mean.Civciv5 (talk) 08:18, December 8, 2013 (UTC).

Answer
I see there is absolutely no possibilty that those articles can be modified in way so they don't get deleted? I have to do this, albeit with pain in my heart. No, I'm not going to delete it because you say so. I must retain my beliefs, I will not give in because you demand it. I'm not ignorant or dumb or anything near that, as you may suggest. If it is that important that my articles are deleted, you'll have to delete them yourself and ban me by force, forever, as I will not stop "ranting" or "trolling". I will accept this fate, if that is my destiny. However, I may just return as somebody else, as I will not give up creating my timeline. On the other hand, I may not return because I can't deal with the guilt of an abandoned timeline. There is also the extremely slight possibilty that you don't ban me, which I would find great and disappointing at the same time, because what should I do then? The articles are essential to my timeline and without them, nothing makes sense anymore. This may seem a bit "overreacting", but I'm just such a person, I am stubborn and hold on into my beliefs, I cannot change who I truly am, neither can you. If I just delete these articles, I will never let go of the "painful feeling" that you would have forced on me. You have already decided what will happen to those articles, haven't you, this may just be a formality. I originally intended my timeline to become very detailed and one of the largest on the wiki, but that future seems to have floated away...to another universe. This may be the last time I write to you (as Civciv5), if so, goodbye, Lordganon, I must say you weren't very friendly to me, but I suppose you're just "doing your job" and that is...keeping annoying fools who fail at creating timelines...such as me from this site. Civciv5 (talk) 19:46, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Accuracy of this Map
I wasn't sure whether or not to leave this as a message or put this on my TL's talk page, so I decided the former.

So basically, before I commence with ICW, I'd like to create a map of Europe at the time of Oberto's death, and I'd like to use this as a basemap, but I'm not sure how accurate it would be. I would've preffered if it was larger, or back to the POD at 940,but I couldn't find one.

Thoughts?



Also ,I uploaded an update to my "Imperial China" flag, but I don't know how to replace it. Could you or another mod do it perhaps?

Canuck2012 (talk) 19:49, December 8, 2013 (UTC)Canuck2012

Here it is.

http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/File:(China)_Flag_of_the_Empire_of_China.png

I'm having trouble replacing the file çause it already exists-coudl you delete the one with the white things in the rays please?

Canuck2012 (talk) 00:05, December 12, 2013 (UTC)Canuck2012

The previous version should be on the Flags of China page.

EDIT: Can a city with the intention of being New Granada's (Viceroyalty) civic capital be founded along the red line here?



Canuck2012 (talk) 22:31, December 22, 2013 (UTC)Canuck2012

Answer again
This is quite disappointing, those parts are essential to the Intergalactic backstory. Luke Skywalker parody? Who? Sky Nadast?I might as well just call the Force magic, but that would be dull, also it has an original name. I simply refuse to delete those pages. What should the Sendi be called then? Some ridiculously long word that no one is able to pronounce? I can't just take those parts away, I'm open to suggestions that make them more original and less-parodying, but simply deleting them would make my timeline boring, just fighting with normal swords seems strange in a highly advanced society also just another boring army that keeps peace would be boring, why not create a mystic, ancient organization that has ties with the Republic and keeps balance but not just some people that fight. I'm writing from a mobile, this is Civciv5. Magic just seems an easy solution to The Force, I already gave it another name. Random people fighting with plasma-blades also seems weird. Civciv5 (talk) 18:11, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Pearl Harbour
Pearl Harbor is in the US - not England.

Therefore, Harbour is incorrect.

EoGuy (talk) 17:05, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Image Trouble
Hey LG, hope you are well,

Yesterday I uploaded a new version of  file. The problem is that the change hasn't registered! Even in the thumbnail of the "new version" on the file's page, it is still the old version of the image. One can only see the new version when one clicks on said "new version" thumbnail. Do you have any idea why this might be? Is it normal for new versions of images to take time to replace old versions? Or is this only an issue on my computer?

Callumthered (talk) 08:56, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Never mind, it's all fixed now; it must have just been a matter of waiting for it to sort itself out (unless you fixed it, in which case thank you!). Hope you have a Happy Holidays, Callumthered (talk) 04:25, December 16, 2013 (UTC)

USSR VH
Thank you so much for the suggestions. I'm really exited about exploring the USSR for this timeline (makes me think of New Union, but better). Also, I wrote on the TSPTF talk on how to change the font-size site-wide. I would love to get your take on it. -- 15:58, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

ReAgain
Me again, I'm running out of titles. Actually Luke Skyson is just the name of a Chrelytian, little or nothing to do with the Sendi, not even a member of them or affiliated with the Sendi or Republic. Luke Skyson is just a name, or are names too copyrighted? Luke is a very common name in the world (and some other planets). Skyson means child (son, daughter) of Sky, the suffix -son is used for the surnames of children of somebody I think. He does not have the same role as Luke Skywalker, as he is not destined to destroy an evil empire and save the universe, he is just one of the 10 "Ones" on Mortis. One of his ancestors was named Sky, it has nothing to do with "the sky" as in clouds or sky in the sense of the visible sight when you look up or something. Anakin seems like a really cool name to me, I would consider it as a real name. Skylighter may seem very weird, but most people outside Earth in my timeline have quite rare and strange names that would be considered extremely weird on Earth. I promise you it won't get much worse, you have my word. PS:I also saw that you readded the Sendi symbol to Coat of arms category, strange because it is a religious symbol originating from Chrelytium, not a flag or coat of arms of a nation.Civciv5 (talk) 16:51, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Re:USSR VH
Knowing how mythological you are to details, I still have to say that I disagree with some of your suggestions (mostly on Yugoslavia). Much of my ideas for the USSR stem from the A Red Century timeline (rather my spin of which), and it includes the Soviet Baltics, a unified Czechoslovakia, and a unified Yugoslavia. Unlike New Union (not to mention a habitable Venus), I feel there's enough time and availability to solve these issues for this timeline. These include:


 * Economy &mdash; The doesn't happen, and the Soviet economy is (in lack of a better word) excellent.


 * Stability &mdash; With the USSR beating the Americans to Venus, I think this would cause pride for the Soviet Union among its citizens and its communist allies.


 * Venus &mdash; Given the notion that Venus has become the home of many dissidents (not to mention likely pressure from Moscow), I'd think that many of those who opposed the USSR may find themselves going to Venus to establish what they want.

These should help keep the Baltic States Soviet and (knowing the peaceful nature between the two) Czechoslovakia together. Yugoslavia is by far a variable, but I'd feel that with the USSR becoming more economically similar to them, Yugoslavia would likely reopen co-operation with Moscow. With a better economy, there should be no need to completely oppose the Yugoslav federation, and those who outright opposed it may very well be offered territory on Venus (in fact, my idea for is based on these peoples).

If I'm just sounding like a broken record, then I do apologize (I was looking forward to exploring topics which couldn't be possible in NU). I'd also like to add that if you really think about it, VH will always be marked as ASB (no matter how I work it out). Given the astronomical differences involved, I'd like to think a continuing Yugoslavia would pale in comparison to a habitable Venus. But then again, this could be me. -- 19:40, December 17, 2013 (UTC)

Answer/Question again?
I do not understand the meaning of retroactive explanations? Are you suggesting my explanations were retarded or fake or something? Also which pages? The ones about the lightsabers? Well, it was quite inevitable that that part was needed. Also many stories, films, video games etc. use plasma-swords, I might as well call them that, but plasmasaber doesn't sound as "cool" enough. Also which other ones? Technology? Species? I thought I had promised you it wouldn't get much worse. I think I'm finished with "borrowing" stuff from Star Wars. I think I may have all necessary elements now. Civciv5 (talk) 03:21, December 18, 2013 (UTC)

New timeline idea?
Hello, since you seem to be the "best" writer around here, I would like your opinion on some timeline idea. I might create a new timeline, with the purpose of being plausible, unlike my previous one. That doesn't mean I'm gonna abandon Great Empires, but I will monitor and edit them both. This could be really good, because I will be able to "climb higher" faster in the ranks of the wiki. I haven't yet chosen a good name but I'm thinking of "Resistance" or "Rise of Empires" or something like that. Also, would it be bad if I take some of the stuff of Great Empires and reuse it in this timeline, such as the Aztec Emperor list (I wouldn't like to come up with new names)?The largest point of divergences would be these: With the absence of most European nations and no need to discover new land as the Mongols do not threaten the trade routes, America isn't discovered by the west until much later, allowing the Native Americans to unify into a "Native States of America/Sinica/Norsica", but they wouldn't call themselves that of course. English would be a much less global language, with Chinese possibly being the trade language or maybe the language of the largest European state. The world could possibly be more advanced in technology if China stays strong and unified.
 * Wu Zetian still becomes Empress (like in Great Empires) and she manages to found a solid dynasty, resisting the Mongols and defeating them, preventing the Mongol Empire from ever conquering much territories and trying to give women more rights. She also focuses on foreign trade by opening the borders with more countries, welcoming all merchants and visitors. By this, China stays technologically advanced, far more than the rest of the world and doesn't adopt an isolationist policy, eventually sending ships to discover the world (Zheng He?). China discovers America (which could be called Zhenglu "land of Zheng" or maybe some New China or Sinica something?). China isn't interested like Europe in mass colonization like Europe and instead makes friendly contact with the natives ("Americans" (not USA), Aztec, Inca), trading with them and eventually importing advanced weaponry. China still colonizes the entire western coast of America and conquers a large portion of Asia. China+Tibet+Mongolia. Should the Chinese colony eventually become independent? This also leads to a largely "easternized world", with China being the world's largest power and Chinese being the largest language.
 * Alexander the Great conquers a lot of territory like in OTL, but does not overexpand his empire and does not die at age 32. This causes Alexander to solidify his empire, leading to a more stable empire. When Roxana bears him a son and he is still alive, he is the legitimate successor to the Alexandrian throne. When Alexander dies from old age, his son Alexander IV becomes King of the Alexandrian Empire. Over the generations, the empire still crumbles due to the many ethnic groups, but manages to hold Greece, most of the Balkans, Anatolia, Syria, Lebanon, Isreal and Palestine to present day. Greece will be a more powerfull nation, though not a superpower.
 * Carthage manages to defeat Rome and wins the Punic Wars somehow, stopping the rise of the eventual Roman Empire, Rome becomes a vassal state of Carthage. Carthage conquers a large part of North Africa and Spain. Rome is even more unable to defend itself against "barbarians" and is destroyed. Carthage may become the basis of the entire Western civilization? What would happen? Carthage eventually Christianizes like the Roman Empire, eventually the Visigoths invade Spain and Carthage defeats them, but allows them to remain within the empire, would Spanish and Portuguese languages still develop? Carthage may become a major power, but not a superpower.
 * Would the French language still form in the absence of Latin in Gallia? Could the Frankish Empire still exist or would the warring Gallic tribes eventually unify into a unified Celtic Empire/Nation? (not actually a POD, but a question)
 * Christianity finds difficulty spreading to France, Germany and Great Britain, eventually the Celtic and Germanic people adopt Christianity, like Carthage and the eventual reformed Romans into a unified Italy. But there is an exception, unlike in reality, the Vikings/Norsepeople manage to become a more or less unified nation, eventually conquering all of Scandinavia. They remain "Heathen" and continue to worship the Norse religion, maybe causing conflict with Christian nations. With a unified Norse Empire, would Danish, Swedish, Norwegian languages still form? Would the Old Norse continue to exist, maybe Runes also? They also discover America before the Chinese, with them calling it Vinland (but Europeans calling it Norsica or something like that?). They establish a large colony in OTL Canada, eventually this colony may or may not rebel. They also meet Native Americans and fight for a while, but eventually co-exist with them. Could this be plausible? The Norse would be a major power, but not a superpower, what would be the maximum population of Scandinavia and Iceland with a unified and prospering Norse Empire?
 * A strong pharaoh of Ancient Egypt (maybe Ramesses II or Hatshepsut?) conquers even more territory for the Egyptian Empire, causing the nation to develop a longlasting, solid dynasty. With this strong dynasty Egypt eventually becomes a major power, with no Romans to attack them and Carthage isn't powerful enough. They even defeat the First Persian Empire and the Alexandrian Empire, remaining an independent nation till today with the Egyptian religion and culture. Could this be plausible? Would Egypt be an absolute monarchy? With this Egypt may be controlling Hejaz, possibly preventing Islam from ever forming, though it could be present as a smaller religion in Arabia only. Egypt occupies Egypt, parts of Sudan and Lybia (possibly Ethiopia, which may or may not be Christian or build its own empire?).
 * Persia manages to become an empire again due to the instability of the Alexandrian Empire in Greater Persia, under the Sassanid Empire, Persia conquers all of Greater Persia, Iraq and most of Central Asia, becoming a superpower once again, but being prevented by a strong Egypt and Greece from taking over Europe or Africa. With this Persia trades with China, becoming a very rich and prosperous country with the second largest empire in the world, possibly becoming the second-most powerful country in the world.
 * Some other states like the Maurya Empire and a Sinhalan Empire manage to exist? Possibly with no Islam, India would be very different. The Maurya would be a major power or superpower.
 * The Khmer Empire becomes even more powerful than in Great Empires, proving to be a resisting power to China, conquering all of Southeast Asia (Burma, Thailand, Laos, Vietnam (Chinese invasions?), Cambodia, Malaysia, Borneo, Indonesia and New Guinea (called something alse). The Khmer Empire with its huge population (second to China and India) would be a superpower.

This could be a possibly list of present-day nations: Comments? I would like you to judge the plausibility of this possible timeline, which things are plausible and which are not, so I may create a plausible timeline and also if my ideas are original. Sorry for the long post. This timeline will only explore Earth, no extraterrestrial things involved like Great Empires. I may have forgotten to say some thinsgs, but I will write them later... Thanks!
 * Norse North America (Canada+Alaska), would be possibly called something else than Canada
 * Chinese Zhenglu, possibly independent
 * Native America (Native Sinicans?Native Norsicans?)
 * Aztec Empire
 * Inca Empire
 * Caribbean nations (possibly colonized by Carthage or some native empire, or maybe the natives form a nation)
 * Brazil (possibly called something else, maybe colonized by Carthage, Celts, Franks, Norse, India, Persia, Mali or Egypt?, China would possibly be too far away? or possibly native nations)
 * Argentina (possibly called something else, colonized by one of the nations above or maybe native nations)
 * Possible other South American nations
 * Carthage
 * Egypt
 * Ethiopia (may be occupied by Egypt)
 * Kanem-Bornu
 * Mali Empire (controlling most of West Africa)
 * Benin Kingdom
 * Kongo Empire
 * Mutapa Kingdom
 * KItara
 * Zulu
 * Other African minor states (may be colonized?)
 * Arabia (possibly the sole Islamic nation)
 * Persia
 * Italy
 * Alexandria/Greece
 * European nations (Celts, Franks, Germans, Hungarians, Polish...)
 * England
 * Scotland
 * Wales
 * Ireland
 * Norse Empire
 * Russia
 * China
 * India
 * Sri Lanka
 * Khmer Empire
 * Korea
 * Japan
 * Oceania
 * Australia (possibly colonized by some European or Asian nation, possibly called something else)
 * Possibly others

Civciv5 (talk) 09:10, December 19, 2013 (UTC)

noticed you added Kaiser-Sieg as ASB-biased, why is this so? it uses the same point of divergence as central victory (but with a different timeline afterwards), so why is it considered biased and centreal victory not so?

Sameva555 (talk) 11:48, December 26, 2013 (UTC)

Happy holidays
Hello, it's me again. Not trying to be rude, but could you take a look at my previous question? I just don't want to start a new timeline with it being labeled as biased as soon as it is created. A biased timeline would be disqualified for featured status, but would "magic" or "environmental" from ASB also count for disqualification? You may just be very busy as its holiday period, I can understand that. I just wish you a happy holiday period and please don't  feel obliged to answer my question immediately. It's almost New Year so I wish you a happy New Year!

Civciv5 (talk) 19:21, December 29, 2013 (UTC)

Hi
Hey, LG, sorry I haven't been working on my DD pages. I have been quite busy with other things and life in general. Ok, but. I see that u say I would only have 1 plane. I understand aircraft eat parts, but between the major towns and territory in my nation there are 3 small airports with 10-15 planes, and one larger one with 15-25 aircraft in otl. But before DD, in otl the larger one had over 60 aircraft there, the one in Danville had over 20, one had 10, and one wasn't open yet. That gives my nation 70 aircraft. Now, assume 2/3 got emped, that leaves 23 aircraft (yes, 70 doesn't divide evenly). Most of the light aircraft are Cessna 173 planes, so they have common parts. U could (with sporadic use), operate 3 airplanes.

Another thing, could u check out my pg for [Retribution (DD: 1983)] thanks. Daeseunglim (talk) 15:41, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Lol. I'll go nominate it but I'll sign my name too this time! ;)

Makes sense to do so, it will help to get in more option for users to vote on. And I am in India, so Happy New Year lol. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 20:09, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, and I'll try lol. ;)  Imp (Say Hi?!) 20:21, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Ok, removed the other one and closed the nominations. Its voting time. If you could please make the necessary edits to get voting options up that would be great! :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 12:21, January 4, 2014 (UTC)

Category
Is there a reason why you changed the "Principia Moderni III" category to "Principia Moderni III map game"? It's been an unofficial rule that game categories are specifically not named that, and games have been renamed from it in the past. Unless you want to rename basically thousands of items, I advise against this move. Anyway, as a moderator of the game, I ask that you please do not do this. Mscoree (talk) 15:14, January 2, 2014 (UTC)

Okay I see you've moved on to other games. Can you please stop? Please? You're basically creating two categories at this point for each map game. One with three pages, and the other with one hundred pages. I would fix it but I don't want to get banned. Seriously I think this is a very bad idea. TSPTF members have edited categories in the past to undo this. You're just creating a mountain of work for yourself to get some simple edits or whatever, and I feel this is a waste of time and only causes confusion. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 14:28, January 3, 2014 (UTC)

Please stop seriously. Can you at least refrain from editing my pages? Please? This is my third message and you haven't even replied. Mscoree (talk) 15:13, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

DD:1983 PA
Hey, I was looking at the pages for North Penn, State College, Reading, and my page (Commonwealth of Susquehanna. My nation is in the process of clearing/annexing the rest of Schukill county. First: can I edit North Penn, SC, and Reading to give dates on contact in the Foreign Relations section? Second: Is my page canon now, or very close b/c I have worked very hard on it for 6+ months. Also can u look at the National Guard Page. Third: If u look at the map, now with my nation, all four nations/city-states have borders with one another. The American Spring is ongoing. Could I make a canon page for a proposed nation of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania? The page would outline a theoretical state, with population numbers, what major economical activities would be, capital, major cities, military, etc. The page would also state the current status (ie: alliances, treaties, etc). It would be in theory. The state wouldn't exist yet but I can only see advantages of a merge. Stronger military for all of them, especially the CoS, aircraft facilities that were abandoned and a major power plant in the CoS, a variety of economic activities, possibly relink rail lines and interstates. interstate 80 connects the CoS, Sc, and North Penn.

Thank you for your time, and have a nice day. Daeseunglim (talk) 12:42, January 3, 2014 (UTC)

Glitches in the machine (DD)
Well I'm back to the mother of all TLs lol.

Looking over my new aquisitions, I seem to notice there are a lot of glitches in the machine. For one, you said it would make more sense for them to invade Cape territories. That made a lot of sense to me toom and so I have begun to change that on the Histroy of NB page. However, what I am a bit baffled by if the fact that it said they withdrew from OFS territory. Here, they will not withdraw from warlord territories at all I would not think. I would think the SAC and ANZC would establish a small state on the coast, and allow the NBers, who unduobtedly are bringing in a good reigeme to the region to keep the lands they gained. Not to add it was the military conducting the expansion and they would be able to keep control on the new lands too. Plus, it would make for a better reason for withdrawing from KwaXhosa, as there would be two reasons for the NBers to withdraw from the state.

Plus, I would think as a result the OFS would have more land to the south which is currently under the control of NB. Thoughts? I really think I can make this work as most of the articles in South Africa now belong to me, so... Imp (Say Hi?!) 08:57, January 5, 2014 (UTC)

And what do you mean exactly by violate? I am a little confused. Chris is fine with me changing the things and would you be able to tell me how it would be less plausible? I really would like your view on the matter too. I like whimsy in TLs and I was just trying to do that here. What aspects do you think I should change to make the TL better. I really like my ideas and I would like to see as much of them in the timeline - plausibly - as I can to make it good to read. Thanks! :)  Imp (Say Hi?!) 09:05, January 5, 2014 (UTC)

Le LG? Imp (Say Hi?!) 15:11, February 1, 2014 (UTC)

These admins are always instigators.
I was only tying to offer him to help me on a wiki I recently created. Ismael Perez 00:45, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Wilt of the Carnation questions
How have you been doing (been pretty quite these past few weeks). I can understand, the holidays were rough for me as well.

Anyway, I've been meaning to get your opinion on the timeline named Wilt of the Carnation. Pretty much, it's where the Carnation Revolution of Portugal fails to happen and it remains a dictatorship for another decade (as well as continuing to fight its many colonial wars in Africa). A new revolution in the 1980s does end the dictatorship, and a compromise is made between the many factions of Portugal and the "tired" African colonies: establish a federation between Portugal and its colonies.

I came across this many months ago and I fell in love with it. I've also noticed the creator has been absent from the timeline (and the site) for years now. I've been considering adopting the timeline, but I wanted to get a second opinion from you. As it may look at first, the timeline looks too... optimistic (if you know what I'm getting at). I wanted to get your take and as if you think the timeline is ASB (it doesn't have the ASB tag on it).

I'd also like to be sure I go about this in the correct way (adoption wise). I'll message the creator and if I don't get back a reply after a certain amount of days than I can assume I can step in. I look forward to your reply. -- 01:59, January 10, 2014 (UTC)


 * It's been a while since we've talked and I just wanted to be sure you're doing alright. I heard about your home issues and do hope you and your family are doing alright. -- 02:57, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

Glad to hear you and your family are doing alright, and I do hope it continues. As elaborate as you've been, I'm glad to hear it wasn't as serious as I previously thought. When Tropical Storm Debbie past over us a few years ago we had flood warnings. Right behind our home is a cow pasture and a river. The River actually flooded to the point that the pasture turned into a lake, and my family and I worried about evacuations as well. Luckily it didn't get that bad, but I understand the stress and confusion. As before, we all wish you guys luck.

Glad to hear it isn't ASB, though not sure how to take it being "too far optimistic." I've already written the user (who hasn't messaged me back). I'll give it a few more days or weeks before I message the talk page. I'll write something akin to what I told the user (though more detail), and I will leave it open for advice from others. -- 15:23, February 5, 2014 (UTC)


 * I just wanted to let you know of two things. The first is that the original caretaker hasn't responded to me in over two weeks. Is this enough time to wait? Or wait a while longer?


 * Also I wanted you to be aware that BrianD has announced his retirement (which now makes me full caretaker of the Outer Lands). Because of this, I got to thinking about a new idea involving the Outer Lands I wanted to get your opinion on (since you are the main DD guy). I wrote about it here. I just wanted to get your opinion before I bring this up on the proper channels. -- 02:28, February 10, 2014 (UTC)

"Goodwill"
I guess I don't win Copy Editor again this year :) Sorry you had to change them all back. Bil EoGuy (talk) 15:14, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Goodwill vs good will
Either is correct -- goodwill also good will.

Bil

EoGuy (talk) 05:45, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Hey LG
Can u hop on the chat were it says special chat, alot of us would like to talk to u.  <font color=Purple face="Algerian">OCT MARIUS, HAIL HIM

Can this wiki have an affiliation with my wiki? Thanks. Ismael Perez (Talk) 02:03, January 9, 2014 (UTC)

Battle for Earth: Prime
Just so you know Battle for Earth: Prime is a timeline. I am not sure why you keep adding "Map Game" to all the titles, but it isn't a map game. Yesterday Monster Pumpkin had to spend a lot of time undoing this, so I would like to kindly ask you to stop. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 14:11, January 9, 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Two things.

Firstly, Ms, godammit, stop posting here. You're always rude (And yes, the above was pretty damn rude), LG always escalates, and it always develops into a firestorm.

Secondly, LG, while BFE- the franchise- is a map game, this is not, actually. This is probably just a misunderstanding due to that- I had the same when I first heard of it, actually- but Prime is actually a timeline that is based on the franchise in general. As such, it is not meant to apply to the games, but is actually meant to be an independent timeline, or would be if we would actually get around to working on it :D.

Anyway, sorry for the confusion, I hope this resolves everything nicely. Thanks!

22:21, January 10, 2014 (UTC)

Question
I would like to get your opinion on something. So in the timeline Yellowstone: 1936 recently I have been working on the Pacific War article, and I was wondering what you think would be a good way to end the war. So to get you up to speed, for various reasons Japan won the Battle of Midway, and the United States remnants now has zero aircraft carriers. I plan for them to go through with, invading and occupying Fiji, Samoa, and New Caledonia. In your opinion what do you think would be the next major offensive? For the Japanese do you think an invasion of Australia would be feasible? What would be the Allies' plan of action? Lastly, what would be a logical reason to have the Japanese end the way? Anyway, I just want your insight on the matter (please don't edit the page). Let me know what you think. Mscoree (talk) 20:22, January 14, 2014 (UTC)

Possible POD and effect on WW1
I realize this has probably been brought up but im taking a course currently in which my Professor at my college is a professional in military history and i managed to get into a conversation about the Battle of Jutland. In all Regards Germany got screwed to large effect cause the British had the codebook off the magdeburg, My professor was saying that if the British had not gotten that then the German High Seas Fleet could be much more combat effective.

So say Magdeburg does not occur and the code book is not seized, and the Germans are able to draw at least 1 or 2 decisive engagements against the Grand Fleet, how does this change the outcome of the war. In the agreed opinion of me and my professor it was said that Germany would not have had to be as highly active with unrestricted Sub warfare, and hence preventing the irking of the United States (at least as quickly.) This considered the Germans would also not have to send the Zimmerman Telegram and hence fully pissing off the United States. Since i didnt have time to polish off the end of this discussion, Would it be considerable plausible or Doable that because of a Decisive victory (or two) based off the fact the Germans never lost their codes and were able to carry out the piecemeal picking apart of the Grand Fleet (which is what my Professor considered would be the hard part to justify) If not could a Stand up Battle between both fleets occur at Jutland that is much more decisive in the Germans Favor, which allows for a much more open shipping area for Germany

Outside of this (the codebook still remaining out of British hands) could the Germans have won in any way, cause there seems to be a community of people that agree that either a Redistribution of Force at the battle of Marne, Lack of Zimmerman telegram, Germany decisive victory at Jutland could have changed the war. I would just like to start up a possible TL with a German Victory in the war and was just giving you the possibilities i considered. Whats your take on those, and if anything what would be the best possible way for a German victory. I would like multiple inputs on this rather than that of a Single Military Historian professor at my college

The Unchallenged Conqueror #FP (Talk to Me) 11:37, January 19, 2014 (UTC)

After the Fact:

If not, could a much more better termed German peace treaty/armistice be carved out followed maybe another year of war out of the possible victories/losses inflicted over the years. It seems the only people that really wanted Versailles were the French and the British and Americans considered it much to harsh, could a much looser or much less harsh Versailles be established in which Germany wasnt so severely and dynamically set up for a Future of making sure Fascism occured.

If the case would the Germans still lose all their colonies, would they still have to take full blame, would there be reparations, if so would they be as bad as they were OTL.

Just Heard
Hey LG. I just heard about you having to move to avoid the floods. I hope you are ok and so is your family and your home. Wiki is doing fine now so don't worry if you don't edit as much currently. :)  Imp (Say Hi?!) 22:01, January 19, 2014 (UTC)


 * This is why you've been gone? I'm truly sorry to hear about this. Like Imp and the rest of us here, we wish you well and hope you and your family are doing fine. -- 22:16, January 19, 2014 (UTC)

Stirling Awards
Dear Lordganon, Right now I have no timelines or other major projects to contribute to, and am waiting for the beginning of Principia Moderni III to begin contributing. With the advent of this rule I edited my profile to the point where it was actually presentable and useful. Considering that I am now over 200 edits I would like to replace my votes since I am now eligible. Otherwise I believe it is unfair that you should remove votes counter to/against your own opinions. Thank you, RazorFangZ14 (talk) 17:33, January 22, 2014 (UTC)

Terra Nostrum
Hello, I'm on vacation and I got a message you wanted to delete Terra Nostrum. Don't do it, when I come back I'll try to update and make a timeline.

Closing time?
It is already January 26th. Closing time of the voting for Stirling Awards? FirstStooge (talk) 12:33, January 26, 2014 (UTC)

I am sorry. I thought it was going to be closed at the original time because it said so on the page. Sorry about that. Imp (Say Hi?!) 12:40, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

I'm not here to cause trouble but let me explain my cause: 1). I'm creating a Stirling Awards on my wiki, but since my wiki is new, and I use an iPad, I can't create a ".png" file and I can't modify a file, so I need help to create a logo for it. 2). The No European Colonization timeline is a cross-wiki timeline, so I'm linking the timeline from this wiki which talk about the timelines past to my wiki which talks about the timelines future. Ismael Perez (Talk)

My article I made recently has been marked for deletion. What is meant by "no permission" I thought anyone could edit at wikia, and as for no timeline, I was under the impression you could create your own, which I am in the process of doing.

DK Wolf 27

What about now? 5 days have passed. Imp (Say Hi?!) 14:17, February 1, 2014 (UTC)

Has this been seen yet?
Hello, I am Edgeofnight, a new user to wikia and the wiki. I searched for this place on the Wikia main page and saw this:http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Adoption:Alternate_History_Wiki At first I assumed that it was older, but clicked on it out of curiosity. You will see that it is a fairly new post by Mscoree, who is banned at the moment, requesting to Adopt this wiki. The request has been pretty much vetoed, but I feel like this should be seen if it hasn't. I really don't know what is going on between Ms and the admins, but I assumed you did and it seems to me that most of this post is directed at you.Sorry if this has already been seen.What is this????Is this a signature??? (talk) 20:24, January 29, 2014 (UTC)

Finland's pages has been updated a bit. Care to check it out and give me some feedback? 06:08, February 2, 2014 (UTC)

Yus
*Does a little jig on the floor*

Thanks LG! I hope I can do more work on them to make them even better, lol. :)  Imp (Say Hi?!) 13:09, February 2, 2014 (UTC)

Stirling Award
They LIKE me! They REALLY LIKE me!

Quoting Sally Field at the OSCARS.

Thanks.

Last year i didn't even know about the awards.

Bil

EoGuy (talk) 16:12, February 2, 2014 (UTC)

RE: AH Stirling Award
Thanks you very much from all of us :D Regards! --Katholico (talk) 21:32, February 2, 2014 (UTC)

The Christmas Mutiny
Hello, I'm John M. Burt, author of the alternate history novel  The Christmas Mutiny.

I was thinking that althistory.wikia would be a place for me to promote my book, and a place where I could dump the extensive notes I have about the world which developed after the Christmas Truce of 1914 ended the Great War.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Christmas-Mutiny-John-Burt-ebook/dp/B007DMX0C8

https://www.facebook.com/TheChristmasMutiny

I'd like to post here, but wasn't sure if it would be considered appropriate. Can you advise me?

Those Edits
Dear Lordganon,

I don't think I understand why you have removed those edits. This is probably some sort of misunderstanding, so if you could please contact me soon that would be much appreciated. I'm not sure if you read my last message while I was banned, in which I attempted to explain this, so I will phrase it here.

On the Spain page please re add the 11,415 bytes you confusingly removed. I'm sure this was just some misunderstanding, but KongKarls3 is a registered member of the timeline and was working with Reximus to make that page. It appears he put a lot of work into writing that page, and I am not sure why the author's work would be removed. So please undo that when you get a chance. As for the templates, those are templates that I made and/or I've imported. I believe you mistakenly grouped those with the others, but I can assure you that those templates are intended to remain as I left them.

Anyway thank you for your time regarding this matter, and I hope that we can peacefully resolve this soon, so that those pages can be fixed. Thank you, Mscoree (talk) 13:07, February 4, 2014 (UTC)

please tell me exactly how kaiser krieg is asb, tell me which elements you think are asb and i could remove them, i want to make it into a good tlSameva555 (talk) 17:15, February 5, 2014 (UTC)

PA
Thank u for your help. Would it be more realistic to have one Cessna 152 as an air arm to the army rather than a seperate force? And are my other sections good then on both pages?? Daeseunglim (talk) 13:09, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

A Few Questions
Hi, LG, how are you doing? (I saw the flood troubles thing in January a few days ago - I had no idea! Hope it's better now). I wanted to ask you a few questions regarding several fields, mostly a new timeline I was planning and 83DD.

Firstly, I'd like you to check the sandbox to the new timeline I'm writing, In Frederick's Fields. There's not much there yet, but I'd like to start ahead and see if you believe the few ideas I've written down to be plausible. Is my course of modernisation and liberalisation of Russia and Germany plausible? Could these nations ally with Great Britain into some sort of "democratic alliance" against France, Austria and Turkey in an alternate First World War?

Furthermore, I'd like to ask you a few things about possible states in 1983: Doomsday. Firstly, would a (small) state anywhere in the Ural region, preferably the Idel-Ural republics or Komia, be feasible? Somewhere along the lines of the southern Komi Republic, Mari El, Udmurtia or Chuvashia?

I'd also like to know what is your opinion on a possible and its spreading beyond to turn into a large Subsaharan war, with most sattes in Central and Eastern Africa involved. Guns, Imp and I had been thinking about this for a while, and we'd like to know your thoughts.

Finally, I'd like to ask you, what do you think the situation regarding HIV/AIDS would be in the Doomsday universe? Would it be as big of an epidemic as IOTL, or would the collapse of international travel early in its epidemic stages (AFAIK it was still called GRID as of Doomsday) stunt its growth?

Thanks in advance! Fed (talk) 04:10, February 10, 2014 (UTC)

Hey dude why do you keep messing with my pages? Moderator TC 11:33, February 13, 2014 (UTC)

LG, hi! Firstly, I would like to thank you for taking care of the YS:36 page on Spain. Like I stated on the talk page, I was unaware that my page had be "given" away. Thank you for that! Secondly, I wanted to talk a bit on DD. I want to ask permission to adopt the following pages: Thank you, LG, for considering my requests! 08:21, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Faroe Islands - Member of NU and proposal
 * Iceland - Member of NU and proposal
 * Estonia - Member of NU and short article
 * Courland - Member of NU and short article
 * Latgalia - Open for Adoption
 * Lithuania - Member of NU and proposal
 * Baltic Alliance - Made reference to in a few pages
 * Sweden - Member of NU and proposal
 * Denmark - Member of NU and proposal
 * Asturias - Spanish state
 * Republic of Iraq - Proposal
 * Islamic Republic of Iraq - Want to make
 * Tucson - Never struck by a nuke, but AZ's second biggest city
 * New Zealand - Part of BrianD's ANZC, but technically a stub
 * IIHF - Sports league in need of renovation
 * IOC - Sports association in need of expansion
 * 2014 Winter Olympics - I can do a great job on this!

Copyright Violation
If you're going to reverse my decisions, it would be nice to at least have the respect to explain why.Oerwinde (talk) 02:56, February 17, 2014 (UTC)

hi this is the creator of the althist 1985 the fall just wondering why u want to delete my page and what i can do to fix it please just try and contact me thanxRaydoggy44 (talk) 06:54, February 17, 2014 (UTC)

1983:DD Inspired Map Game
Hey LG. Look I was going to ask. Since DD is such a successful TL, I would like permission for someone to create a map game inspired by DD. So can somebody do it? I am just asking if one of the users can make a map game inspired by 1983:Doomsday. Ratc3333 Here, Prepare for Combat (talk) 17:17, February 17, 2014 (UTC)

I beg you, LG, please, please, perish the very idea of dreaming about so much as entertaining about this idea.

22:48, February 18, 2014 (UTC)

Byzantine Empire survival as a major state
ive been playing with the idea of starting a new timeline based on the byzantine empire not collapsing, would that have been possible, and if so what could be a good point of divergence? Nkbeeching (talk) 19:29, February 17, 2014 (UTC)

i was thinking possibly basil ii marrying young and having an heir. Nkbeeching (talk) 21:37, February 17, 2014 (UTC)

re:Congratulations
Thank you, LG. I promise to use my powers in a fair and honest manner in order to act in the best interests of the wiki. May I ask if there is anything in particular that we urgently need help with?

I'd also like to take this opportunity to thank you for the advice on the history major that you gave me a while ago. I have since put the information to good use; I will be starting college this Fall semester with a history major. I look forward to working on this wiki in the years to come and I look forward to expanding my knowledge of history. CrimsonAssassin- I have special eyes 16:16, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

I havnt argued with JBW since the other day, and last night I was trying to make peace with him. -Nova 10:17, February 22, 2014 (UTC)

Derivative Rule Question
So in PMIII Nova/DS has renamed the Timurids the "Dominion of Draka", which she/he has said is a "tribute to Stirling." I'm not sure, but would this not be allowed under the derivative rule? It is insanely implausible since the word "draka" isn't a word in any language and I don't understand why the Timurids would do such a thing. Thanks, PitaKang- My Life for Aiur!  En Taro Tassadar 02:22, February 25, 2014 (UTC)

It seems that we may have a problem.
This is having to do with other AH websites. There was a banned member from AH.com named Vice President Mike who was booted out of the place for plagiarising timelines. I have seen what he had done to the AH.com wiki, and posted it with graphic whatever it was. Do we take action in case such trolls will invade the Althistory wikia?

General tiu (talk) 16:37, February 26, 2014 (UTC)

Questions
Have I done something wrong? I've noticed that you haven't responded to my questions in the forums. If it's because I haven't been working on my timeline, I haven't found time to and I also couldn't access a computer outside of school for two months,

Regarding those discussions, could you close the ones that not a whole lot of other people have responded down and deleted? Next time, I'll just ask questions on the TL's talk page instead of spamming up the feed.

Anyway, that aside, do you think a federation between Hubei and Yunnan is at all feasible in 1983:DD?

Also, I'm having difficulty with my timeline. I've been considering an original course I wanted to take, but didn't. Would it be possible for Western Christianity to develop between 30-330 as more along the lines of this Wiki's Equalism and Progressive Christianity ,or a primitive version at the least? I'd obviously need to do more research, but would this effect history too much for me to use the POD I have, or would I need to redo it...again?

I'm sorry, I know I've jumped around here in terms of redoing, but I have wanted to see what alternate development of Abrahamic religions would have on the world, particularly if they had Eastern influences.

Canuck2012 (talk) 01:29, March 2, 2014 (UTC)Canuck2012

Friendly Question
This is a friendly question I'm asking you. Is this the first AltHist Wiki? Ismael Perez (talk • contribs • blog) 02:12, March 4, 2014 (UTC)

return to lusitania
im thinking of taking up the lusitania lives again since ive reached a writers block on my other timelines and had some ideas recently for it. my biggest question is would the germans be worse then belgian in the congo or would they act the same way they acted in their other colonies (im not refering to german south west africa). and would a monarchy be restored in france like you said for the other timeline as a revanchist regime?Nkbeeching (talk) 12:36, March 7, 2014 (UTC)

Doctor Who
Would it be possible for me to do an alternative timeline of a TV show here, (Doctor Who) if Ian and Barbara weren't kidnapped by the First Doctor, he probably wouldn't be travelling in time and space with lara today! POMfannumber1 (talk) 06:40, March 8, 2014 (UTC).

I have found An Alternative History wiki. Have a nice weekend,POMfannumber1 (talk) 06:51, March 8, 2014 (UTC).

Bronze and Civ
You claim it is asb, so i wonder what are you requirements or ideas to make the timeline not fall on the ASB criteria, without changing the basis of the Timeline. Sine dei gloriem &#34;Ex Initio Terrae&#34; (talk) 09:43, March 9, 2014 (UTC)

Appealing to the higher powers
LG, Fed and I have gotten into a bit of a rough over PMIII. Took place in chat. Well, I called the mods retarded (they are, honest), and Fed got offended over it being Fed. He whined about the issue and abused his mod powers for what I would like to assume were personal reasons, and made the threat he would ban me from chat for a day (which he did) if I insulted the mods over their actions (not an uncommon thing on chat). Well, being me, I continued with my fight over the plausibility of my actions and the lack of rules that the mods said existed (but where never explained to the players), as Fed continued to complain about my nation's expansion rates, and I called Fed out on the hypocrisy of the PMIII mods, to which Fed said he'd "let slip". Well, it ends with me stating that Fed is a prime example of why you don't give administrative powers to a 15-year old who hasn't matured emotionally yet, and Fed banning me from chat to nurse his hurt feelings. Anyway, I'm seeking a removal of the ban and some kind of limit to Fed's powers until he has learned to grow-up (emotionally that is), and build a bridge of some sort (if you know what I mean). I won't be surprised if Fed appears and whines about how I didn't tell the whole story, but here it is. I would present screenshots (which Fed threatened to take *rolls eyes*), but I closed the chat window by mistake. Oh wells. Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 00:55, March 10, 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I believe the complaining and the awfully patronising attitute are enough proof of why I banned him from chat. He was acting quite smugly, offending people by calling them "retarded and immature", and threatened me with asking you and wikia to remove my adminship (which, apparently, he did). I DO have screenshots, as Viva claims, which I'll be glad to present to you.

I'm sorry for the image-spam, but I don't take lightly to people calling me retarded and threatening to impeach me. I also apologise in advance for the rude behaviour I might've had without properly noticing because of my anger.

Furthermore, if this is not enough proof, please go ahead and ask anyone on chat at the time (such as MP, Guns, Swanky, Feud, Bfox...) and see their opinions on this. Only Swanky and Feud have said he is on my favour, so I believe this is an unbiased enough list. Fed (talk) 01:10, March 10, 2014 (UTC)

As an univolved observer in this argument, I can say that lately Viva has been very aggressive in this matter. On chat if you ask about his nation he tends to insult you or call you names, and it seems to have gotten out of hand. I've seen Fed have to warn Viva many times to calm down. Anyway, I hope that testimonial helps you make a decision. With everything that is being said I thought I'd help clear it up a bit. Mscoree (talk) 01:14, March 10, 2014 (UTC)

Mscoree, please tell the whole truth. if you ask about my nation, I respond politely. When you get aggressive over it, ignore my explainations, and then call me ASB because you can't accept the truth, then I become aggressive. You always act as if I'm the first to go hot when I'm not. I've never used profanities directed toward other users, nor have I ganged up on them to stroke my ego. if anything, I've tried to be as calm and polite as possible until Fed begins shouting threats over infractions he thinks are directed at him. If anything, Fed has abused his power because he can't get over anything, and believes himself to be the moral authority in chat. Look at Guns, Scraw, and Fed, the first to attack me, the first to complain, and the first to react aggressively when I've done nothing by try to answer everyone's questions. Also, I think it's funy that Fed states I was being smug when he himself was gloating about how he has the "right" to the final say, and when I refused to bow to his authority, sought reasons to ban me, claiming that my statments, having nothing to do with him or even offensive but criticism of the mods' ineffectiveness, as "offensive".

I've been called names on numerous occassions, yet I've never acted angrily until I'm attacked personally, and when others refuse to listen to anything I've said while still claiming to be right no matter how much information I give them regarding my actions. My anger comes from being ignored, called ASB, and pushed around by a administrator who claims to know more about a continent I've studied since I was a child, and then demand I get over an insult he's issued while he in turn whines when he claims to have been insulted himself. Thus, Fed is ignorant and ill-informed. He consistantly states that I haven't done things in game when there are clear as day in the posts, yet he is too lazy (fact) to look for them and read them. He won't read any of the information I've given him about the region I'm playing in, and calls my actions ASB when the proof I give him from people who professionally research the regions, prove otherwise.

When I called the mods retarded, I was justified. The mods, like Fed, refuse to read any of the information I provide to them, and I find myself having to repeat my statements over and over again to get the point through, yet it doesn't stick with them. Guns, Ms, and Scraw continously state that I couldn't reach Angola in canoes (a word they put much emphasize on during arguments), ignorant of the fact that African war canoes were as big and as deep as Viking longships, and held up to 120 men. Then extends to other games as well. When I played as Congo, they mods (chiefly Scraw, Fed, and Yank) refused to accept that OTL Congo was the second-most industrialized nation in Africa in the 1960s, I even provided the links. They also refused to accept that Congo could industrialize using the $24 trillion dollars of minerals within their land (link also provided). How do you deal with a mod that is ignorant of the very timeline they're suppose to be moderating if they won't even do or accept the research given them by the players? This is what I'm face with every time I play as an African nation.

The mods who claim I start all of the arguments with them are the very same mods I have had to argue with since I got here. Whenever I call them out on their lack of information, failure to accept the facts, and their blatant hypocrisy, such as when Crimson and Scraw stated that one of my colonies wasn't at risk of a life-or-death invasion (removing a massive motive bonus for me), and attacked it anyway and conquered it, they try to shut me down and villify me. They even named implausible empires in games "Vivempires" to further slander my name. In all, the mods won't act like mods. They say they would alternate history, yet they demand actual history unless it is opposed to their goals. Once they even said OTL didn't count, but when I used ATL, they said OTL did count (this was with Turkey). So yeah, I'm owning it. The mods are retarded, ignorant, arrogant, hypocrits, and liars. I've made my point on this matter clear enough already and close my argument. Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 04:28, March 10, 2014 (UTC)

^That's why I banned him from chat, and in my opinion if the incredibly large amounts of patronisation and insults he threw do not qualify as 'harassing' I don't know what does. He's called us retarded, ignorant, lazy and other stuff you can read on the screenshots. I gave him plenty of chances to stop both ad-hominem attacks, but he just continued, calling me childish, immature, and threatening to start an impeachment process. In fact, I kicked him five times between yesterday and today before banning; not a single time did anyone but Viva consider it unfair. I believe I gave him ample oportunity, and he continued to act badly. When things didn't go his way, he brought it up to you. Honestly, I've seen people wikibanned for less. Fed (talk) 05:20, March 10, 2014 (UTC)

I don't want to have an argument on someone's talk page like this, but to Viva, I didn't say a single thing in that chat, nor did I once say or refuse any of the things he claimed. There is no excuse to call some retarded, that is offensive no matter what. Then you call us ignorant and ill-informed, right before blaming me randomly for statements I never said, just like how on the PM3 talk page you attacked Scraw for things said by Guns. I have never once mentioned the ability to reach Angola, nor any other points here. I think Viva confuses me for someone else. Mscoree (talk) 10:39, March 10, 2014 (UTC)

LG is offline. You want this sorted? Move it to either my talkpage or the TSPTF talkpage. Let LG handle IRL problems and not compound him with map game problems. Imp (Say Hi?!) 12:55, March 10, 2014 (UTC)

RE: Warning
What categories did I add that were incorrect, specifically, because I am having trouble finding which ones you changed.

I don't mean to sound like an administrator, I was just greeting a new user.

I'm not sure what you mean by misbehaving in chat, but I haven't gotten a single complaint.

Mscoree (talk) 10:33, March 11, 2014 (UTC)

Also in regards to the above message, I was told to delete it from your talk page, since it's already on the TSPTF talk page. Please read the message I left redirecting you there. Mscoree (talk) 10:38, March 11, 2014 (UTC)

I was told to move that from your talk page to the TSPTF talk page by the admins. Also I can't find any instances of you removing any categories I had put. Can you gave me one example please? Mscoree (talk) 14:07, March 11, 2014 (UTC)

Okay I saw the two edits you made before your previous message. May I ask why the World Power maps aren't allowed to categorized with the World Power tag? Mscoree (talk) 14:09, March 14, 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure I understand your last statement, but those maps are clearly part of the map game. First of all they have the map game in the title, and are of the same style as all the rest. Secondly, it is common in map games to only display the current map at the top, which is updated periodically, so previous maps "aren't used by it." For example if you view the maps category for PM3 you'll see only one is being used on the page, yet all of those related maps have the category. I hope that helped to clear up any confusion on the matter. Mscoree (talk) 10:42, March 18, 2014 (UTC)

Hello. Ismael Perez (talk • contribs • blog) 19:52, March 18, 2014 (UTC)

As the creator of those maps, as both a mapmaker and moderator for the World Powers game, I'd like to assure you that those maps are in fact part of our map game. Please stop removing the tags from World Power items. It has caused a great bit of confusion and I have the original files on Gimp and Paint to prove it. I would appreciate it if you allowed the category to remain. SwankyJ (talk) 22:52, March 19, 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry if I offended you, sir. I see you have omitted my comment entirely. Good luck to you, my eunuch, slave, other-various-objects friend. Mscoree (talk) 10:39, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

Category Descriptions
Why are you removing the category descriptions from PM3 categories?

As a moderator for PM3 it is my job to fix such things, so why would you undo them all? Mscoree (talk) 13:23, March 20, 2014 (UTC)

Hey, LG. I know this is kind of off-topic, but can you check this out, please: Votes in the Nordic Law Thing. I think that the representation is a bit off-kilter. Also, can you give me a few pointers on what you would like to see in Finland and Latgalia? Thanks, 01:23, March 21, 2014 (UTC)

Kinda idea that probably won't work.
How have you been doing? I do hope everything is doing alright with you and your family.

Forgive me for this, but I came across an interesting piece of history that I may want to incorporate into the New Union timeline. In 2004 there was an in North Korea. What makes it interesting is that Kim Jong-Il was at that station only hours prior (leading to speculation it was a failed assassination attempt). It may be interesting to see what North Korea may be like had he been delayed and wound up being killed (since it was a diplomatic mission to China, maybe he also talked with some Soviet contacts which delayed him... or whatever).

However I don't want to go too deep into this because these kinds of PODs tend to backfire on me, and several issues come up which I would love to get your opinion on. The first would be that had Kim died, it was early enough that his older son might take the lead. He seems rather interesting, especially since he's spoken for reform. However, this was still years after his "Disnyland" incident, so this may be out of the question. Kim Jong-Un may be too young at the time to take up the leadership, so the possibility of a coup or new leadership could be possible (maybe a reformer). A farther idea could be that with the tragic death of Kim Jong-Il (a God to the people), this may raise enough pressure that the people act out against the government, and a revolution of some kind take place. But I know this one is too ASB to happen.

I do hope you are doing alright, and I look forward to your response. -- 01:24, March 23, 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm also considering the idea that the 1995 referendum in Quebec becomes a yes in New Union. I would love to get your feedback on that. -- 02:28, April 10, 2014 (UTC)

I know you've still been busy lately (I do hope you are doing alright), but I thought of another idea I would love to get your opinion on. It involves the Outer Lands establishing settlements in New Jersey. I do apologize to keep bothering you. -- 19:41, April 13, 2014 (UTC)


 * How would NJ be too far off? Ocean County is roughly the same distance that Long Island is to Cape Cod, and I would highly believe the boating and trading infrastructure of the OL would be advanced enough to have a few outposts there. I may have forgot to write it in, but I only saw the large territory as an overall organized claim, with the population living mostly in a few outposts, with a maximum population being in the low hundreds. From this, I still think a few trading posts wouldn't be out of the question.


 * I do have to add that you mentioning Rhode Island as a potential territory seems interesting, especially since I've been considering making the area a territory too (possibly with Vermont help). I would love to get your feedback on this as well, also on my North Korea and Quebec ideas for New Union. -- 13:55, April 19, 2014 (UTC)

Ms *sigh*
Ms has been banned for a day for copping an attitude and inserting false information into a PMIII article he was told several times was wrong. Feel free to adjust the ban as you see fit. CrimsonAssassin- gib clay 21:37, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

That is actually false. I know you may disregard this, but please hear me out. A final algorithm was made by Guns, Feud, Fed (who's on Crim's side), and others, who wrote that the algorithm was locked, and that no one could edit it. Any edits would be undone. Despite this Crim kept editing the algorithm anyway, and MS promptly followed the rules and undid it. Now, desperate to win at any cost, Crim is abusing his admin powers to ban ms and ensure that he wins. If you really think that's fair, then fine, but it sounds like a clear abuse of power. NonEuclidean ツ (Talk) 21:42, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

If I could step in, ALL MODERATORS agree with Crim. MS was undoing mod posts and being severely biased towards himself and was metagaming. NonEuclidean is one of his pets and has been putting words in everyone's mouths, saying things that were contradictory, and much more. Blocky858 (talk) 21:47, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

That post honestly doesn't make sense. Not all moderators, as several moderators like Feud and Fed (who's on Crim's side!) made the final one. Also several moderators aren't even active or haven't made any comment. I'm not a pet, I just think it's unfair to ban Ms for this. Crim could have at least alked to him (although he did leave a message yesterday I believe). Ms kept undoing it and asking him to edit the discussion, not the algo. NonEuclidean ツ (Talk) 21:57, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

NE, they did talk. For an hour or more. Remember? You were there, backing Ms and putting words in people's mouths? Like yesterday with Fed? Anyway, don't lie, NE. It is just sad... Local Mafia Boss (Talk) (Blog)

MS was already gone for ten to twenty minutes by then. Crim said in chat that he was going to ban MS and did, but he wasn't even there to talk to Crim about it. NonEuclidean ツ (Talk) 22:05, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

For the record, Blocky is correct. Every single moderator on the game, bar Ms himself, ruled that the algorithm was fine- then I was called in as a neutral mediator (as I do not play that game), and when I announced that I had fixed the algo, Ms continued to attempt to edit it.

Also, I (as the neutral mediator) made the final algo.

22:27, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

Guns I think you're a bit mistaken on the time frame. You made the final algo (although some others later added input), THEN Crim kept editing it to win even more. The last day or so he's been grasping at straws trying to gain even more points, while MS, myself, and others, have been begging him to just let it go! NonEuclidean ツ (Talk) 22:41, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

That's not what the edit history shows.

22:44, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

Crim edited just today. Last night it was decided the algo was final by Feud and Fed. Ms made numerous compromises at his own expense for the purpose of ending the war, leading to Fed even signing the treaty to end the war. Despite this, Crim continued complaining about the algorithm, something he has been doing in chat for some time now. He continued to edit the algorithm despite several people (including the rest of his side) signing the treaty and declaring it over. Ms was even willing to negotiate on the treaty and basically make it white peace, but Crim still argued. Finally he banned ms, and here we are. NonEuclidean ツ (Talk) 22:50, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

Not true. In fact, both Fed and Feud have expressed the view that they agree with Crim.

Why would Crim make a white peace when he'd won by 10 points?

Ms was warned multiple times not to edit the algorithm.

22:57, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

I honestly thought you mixed up the names there. Fed and Feud agree with Crim because MS agreed with Crim! Ms openly gave up the war in favor of white peace as a compromise. Why would Crim agree? Because at the time of your algo, and Fed's, and Feud's he was losing, or at least tied just about. Ms wasn't warned multiple times not to edit the algorithm, Crim was! Ever since the final algo Crim keeps editing it to win by a larger lead. Ms hasn't edited the algo at all, except with permission (He asked every time in the discussion) or to fix minor errors. He even agreed to white peace just to end this, but Crim is still being aggressive and stubborn, and is demanding that ms be banned, impeached, and defeated all at once, and now he's actually doing it. NonEuclidean ツ (Talk) 23:12, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

Wow. None of that is true at all!

The algo went from Crim winning by 5% to Crim winning by 8%. It did not dip down- EXCEPT where Ms edited it AGAINST MULTIPLE warnings.

Feud and Fed disagreed AFTER.

Ms did not recieve ANY permission, especially since I (or another neutral mod) were the only people allowed to grant permission, and none of us were present. Who's Ms ask? Razor?

Agreed to white peace. After losing by damn near 10%- do you even REALIZE how stupid you sound?

23:16, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

Lordganon please help me. What they're saying is false. Guns wasn't even there on March 27, at approximately 11:00 PM EST when the algorithm was finalized. It was just ms, Fed, myself, and some others in chat. They finalized the algorithm, and Fed even signed signed the treaty. Why would he sign it if the algo was as you say? The truth is that the algo was at 70-54 us, but then MS as a compromise, agreed to remove a x1.25 bonus in exchange for the war ending. That dropped us down to 56-54. At the time that bonus was accepted, even by Feud, although he later retracted his statement. Ms did this out of the goodness of his heart from what I can tell, just to end the fighting and satisfy the other side. Crim then spent all of today arguing in chat and changing the algorithm without permission so that he won! Ms asked him to stop and got banned. I don't know where else to go, as I have already been kicked from chat, and I fear that any attempt to investigate the matter will be met with a similar ban. NonEuclidean ツ (Talk) 23:25, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

WOW! That was so ridiculously incorrect, I cannot believe it!

No less than, umm, every single neutral mod, player, or user who looked at that, agreed that your side did not get the *1.25 ANYWAY.

All of Ms' changes to the algo, that boosted you from 46 to 56, violated the rules. Crim undid those edits.

Fed? Are you joking? I will have Fed come here and testify that he agrees with, well, everyone except you, Ms, Lx, and IATG.

Ms got banned because he edited the algorithm multiple times despite being warned by no less than 4 mods. Before I left, I made it clear that unless I or another mod gave permission, he was not to edit the algo.

No one has ever gotten banned for "investigating". Being stupid and insulting several admins, editing a page despite being told firmly and pretty damn clearly that he was not to do so- are you serious? Crim was NICE!

23:32, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

Um, I signed the algorithm to stop the constant complaining done by Non and Ms by every single tweak of the algorithm. Since that didn't end after that, I completely and absolutely refuse any claim to the fact that I support anything of what he's saying.

In my opinion, Crim was completely right in banning Ms. He was obstructing it all. Fed (talk) 23:35, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

Guns, MS wasn't banned for editing the algo. He was banned for undoing some edits that someone else made to the algo. NonEuclidean ツ (Talk) 23:37, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the backup, LG. Okay, guys, let's not let chat leak onto LG's page. CrimsonAssassin- gib clay 16:47, March 28, 2014 (UTC)

Parrot
I'm not a parrot. Ms wasn't even on chat when this incident occurred, and probably didn't hear about this until after the fact. All I know is that when he was there, any edit by anyone not authorized was undone. Just because Crim is an admin he gets to be the one who bans the other though. Ms wasn't merely doing this to "win". We were talking about status quo first of all. Regardless, everyone probably was a little mad, and I think everyone has calmed down now. Ms must have learned his lesson, so can you please unban him? One month for undoing an edit on an algo doesn't seem to warrant such a cruel and unusual punishment. If that was the case then I can think of several people who deserved to be banned. Please respond. NonEuclidean ツ (Talk) 18:02, March 28, 2014 (UTC)

Someone has told me that this ban isn't entirely about PM3. Is this about you being a eunuch? I look myself and it says so on your profile. Thought it was vandalism but it's not. Maybe there was just some sort of misunderstanding. NonEuclidean ツ (Talk) 19:52, March 28, 2014 (UTC)

I should mention this- I read latin, and though your profile phrase is, ahh, not quite correct, it also doesn't really mean that you're a slave or a eunuch.

It's not very good Latin, as I said. You referred to yourself without gender- but not in a way that would suggest that you had been, ahh, neutered. Furthermore, "anagnostes" means "one whose task it is to read", or "one who reads for a living", which, in ancient Roman times, did refer to a slave who read for a living- a scribe, for instance. However, literally, it means no such thing.

Hope this clear certain things up.

21:26, March 28, 2014 (UTC)

MS asked me to post this for him. As someone who knows Latin as well I have to say I agree with him:

"Not exactly Guns. You are probably familar with the idea of connontation. In English and in most languages certain words basically mean the same thing but are viewed completely differently. Someone who sees the English words "servant" and "slave" might think that they are the same profession, but slave has a much stronger and negative connontation. This is the same for other words, like "good" and "great", or countless others. You have said that since slavery is no longer viewed or used the same way as it was in Ancient Rome that the meaning of the word has changed to simply mean "reader" but this is not the case, for if you examine a few ancient texts, the works of Titus Livius Patavinus (In his Ab urbe condita libri he describes several such scenarios, such as in "The decline of the free population, the spread of slavery (vi. 12, vii. 25), the universal craving for wealth (iii. 26)") for example, you'll see that anagnostes refers to one who does not make a living, but is rather trained to do a task, just like to work in the fields or work as a servant. If you had wanted to say some one who is tasked with reading, or reads for a living, you'd say lector, which actually denotes someone with a skill, rather than a work assignment. Guns is most likely confusing this word with that of Anagnostis, from the Greek, Ἀναγνώστης, which refers to a reader in the sense of a person in the Orthodox church who reads at church. Perhaps what ever translator or source you used confused these definitions? To conclude, anagnostes is not a lector by choice, and carries a negative connontation. Another example of this in English is how "the N-word" originally referred to a slave or person of color, and now is even viewed as a curse word and racial slang for all intents and purposes. If you were trying to translate into English you wouldn't use that word interchangeably for African American.

As for the neuter issue, no you did not specifically say you were chastrated, rather I was trying to illustrate the confusion that arrises when you say you are neither male nor female. Perhaps I should have called you my neuter friend if eunuch is too strong a word.

The important thing I was trying to say is that you have a lot of errors on your profile that I was attempting to help you with, but you continued to ignore me. I thought calling you by the terms you supposedly self identified as would get your attention so you could fix it. I was also a bit agitated since you were basically insulting my intelligence and reading skills on the Superior talk page. An important point of communication is to make a connection with someone through speech. Turning a simple misunderstanding into a debate, arguing for the sake of arguing, is both rude and immature, and basically served to delay matters and create an inane situation where nothing gets done. I get it if someone is too proud to accept advice and fix an error on a page, but you don't have to essentially troll the copyeditor. That was the basic idea anyway of what I was trying to say. I am aware you are (probably) not a eunuch or anything else, but if you found insult in that I apologize. I didn't mean to infer any such thing, just illustrate how one could perceive your profile. I am deeply sorry for insulting you in this way. If you can find it in your heart to pardon me for this action that would be most appreciated. I will refrain from giving out lingual advice to you if that helps. Overall I think this was all just a big misunderstanding, and now that everyone is calm, perhaps we can act like adults and forgive each other. Again, nothing personal with that comment, and I'm sorry.

Thanks, - Mscoree

Tr0llis (talk) 16:06, March 29, 2014 (UTC)

Of course, Latin has not been used properly for over a thousand years, and thus has not evolved as other languages have. Anagnostes may carry a negative connotation, but literally, it will mean "one who reads for a living". Similarly, the N-word is actually just a corruption of the word "Negro", which refers to someone of African-American heritage.

As for the castrated point, since all he did was refer to himself without gender, I think "Bad at Latin" would be a good replacement for "Eunuch", which, frankly, is just insulting.

And, Ms? I don't need to use a translator- I take Latin.

17:34, March 29, 2014 (UTC)

Tr0llis, when you drag me into your little arguments, I really would appreciate it if you would refrain from paraphrasing things that I have said. It not only puts me in a difficult position, but some of the say I said are just outright wrong. If I were you, I would stop harrassing LG constantly about every little thing that comes up regarding Ms. Don't drag other people into your mindless debates. Just carry on with whatever it is that you do. CrimsonAssassin- gib clay 04:01, March 31, 2014 (UTC)

I'll be keeping an eye on him and Euc. Since Ed pretty much suicide-bombed his user page, those two are likely to follow suit. Should be amusing if nothing else. CrimsonAssassin- gib clay 15:11, March 31, 2014 (UTC)

Viva
Viva is blocked? If it was because of his arguing - he had multiple sources and a good argument which i could not see anything wrong with. Imp (Say Hi?!) 11:55, March 30, 2014 (UTC)

Oh? I see. I think he can be slightly hot-headed at times but he is not a bad user overall. I will need to talk to him about all this when he gets back, however. I did see him saying how the admins were abusing their power and I told him he should calm it a bit. I think once he is calm enough he will understand his mistake. This has a lot to do with PMIII anyway - Viva feels he is getting the wrong end of the stick deliberately and such. Imp (Say Hi?!) 12:23, March 30, 2014 (UTC)

Uh...
I have barely written two articles and you have already decided that my new timeline is "biased". This is very depressing for me, you know... You didn't even reply to my post months ago! How can I possibly write a "plausible" timeline according to your guidelines if you don't even give me some advice or something on my timeline idea?! I can't see the bias in this timeline, could you at least explain why you are labeling my timeline as biased?! You see...I love writing, I'm currently writing a novel, which I based on my timeline idea which I informed you of. I also love history and certainly have fun in writing articles here, but you are constantly depriving me of it (no offense intended). I thought I could get a new fresh start with a brand new idea? Please tell me what is "biased" in this timeline, so I may change it or something. If you don't reply to my post I might as well go back to just writing in Word, where nobody can see what I write :(.

Civciv5 (talk) 19:53, March 30, 2014 (UTC)

thanks
thank you very much ill be writing again on my timelines in a few days after i finish my exams. and ill be in touch about more details then again thanks. With Blood and Iron (talk) 16:49, April 1, 2014 (UTC)

What note?
Hey, you recently left a message on my talk page about a note I posted? can you specify what exactly you are talking about?What is this????Is this a signature??? (talk) 18:56, April 1, 2014 (UTC)

Voting
Excuse me my Lord, but why is it that I have been removed from voting? I see myself as a very respectable player. SwankyJ (talk) 20:06, April 1, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry...
Sorry...but if that's what you really think...I have no other choice than to leave this wiki forever. Why is it a China "wank" or Egypt "wank"? China could have surely been so powerful, and I think Egypt could have survived. For example, the nations in Superpowers own a ridiculously large amount of land, why can't Egypt and China do that?Maybe you are right about that women thing, but I just find Wu Zetian very interesting and an androcentric world seems also quite boring, how could it be more plausible to achieve an earlier emancipation of women in some countries?. But you obviously do not believe in it. What should I write then? Some boring Eurocentric history where all of the world is dominated by Europe again? Sorry, but I think Asian, African and Native American history is much more interesting. Can't I create a timeline where Asia or Africa is the dominant power? Which states could not exist? Why don't you propose some original idea that is "plausible" and not "biased" then where some Asian or African nation plays the lead role and Europe is one the sideline doing not so much and playing a minor role? Because I myself can clearly not create "plausible" ideas. I simply cannot live with the fact that I will never be able to create a "plausible" timeline according to your guidelines. I want to continue, but I can't...I can't...I really can't... It's too painful to live with that fact...You didn't even give me some advice or something... This may be my last message ever...this is all really painful and saddening to me. Why can't I be a good writer like you? It's not fair...the entire world is so unfair... Try to imagine how this is for me...

Civciv5 (talk) 15:31, April 2, 2014 (UTC)

Deletion
I've noticed that seom categories I've created for pages I am yet to make have been deleted due to "naming rules". How should I style them in that case?

<font face="Hightower Text" size="4" color="#4876FF">Happychickenvermin (Talk 09:54, April 4, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Answers
No, I should be the one apologizing. I was impatient and impulsive, and I had taken it to heart.

I hadn't thought it was that plausible, they were quite persistent about the idea. No offender to them.

Canuck2012 (talk) 18:41, April 5, 2014 (UTC)Canuck2012

DD
Hey, is the "Conch Republic" occupied?

Canuck2012 (talk) 01:22, April 10, 2014 (UTC)Canuck2012

Russia
<p style="font-size:14px;">Why don't we eliminate the USSR and replace with the Russian Federation?

Ismael777
Sorry if he's been a nusance, he apparently likes his interlinking wikis and what you lot call 'spam'. I just put up with the 'spam' on my wikis since he has dome some work articles as well. So it's a matter of tolerance, ether that, or he's really excelled him self here and annoyed you lot so much he's got banned. He can be rude and annoying at times to. Hopefully he will calm down in time. :-/ Whipsnade (talk) 00:15, April 11, 2014 (UTC)

Taino Federation
The links to his time line were not spam in my oppinion.Whipsnade (talk) 16:35, April 15, 2014 (UTC)

Your right, LG, according to what I now found on other Wikias
He was so bad on Wikipedia he got banned [] and []! He is banned on a couple of other Wikias[]. I know he stalked Daneofscandinavy, but he now has harassed you badly. He went to far on this Wiki and Wikipedia. Is it worth presenting a case to Wikia to get him network wide blocked for a while? A 2 week or 1 week network wide job to bring him in to line? A flamer/troll baiter?

TSPTF logo
I saw he ripped it off of your site, I will delete it and the apparent ripoff of the Sterling Awards to.Whipsnade (talk) 19:34, April 11, 2014 (UTC)

I even found and removed your logo http://alternate-future.wikia.com/wiki/File:AltHist-wordmark.jpg Whipsnade (talk) 22:24, April 13, 2014 (UTC).

Ratc333
I have found him on several wiks and hes banned on many. I will go to Wikia for a network block on all his sock-puppets and a couple of days on an IP ban just to make sure. I think I have evidence enough, if not I'll drop a link in so Althists mods can add any thing they know.Whipsnade (talk) 23:10, April 14, 2014 (UTC)

I've just reported him to Wikia Commuity Central.Whipsnade (talk) 00:55, April 15, 2014 (UTC)

Is he Ismael777's school cronie? They are chummie.Whipsnade (talk) 16:29, April 15, 2014 (UTC)

I don't know or say this definitively.Whipsnade (talk) 16:40, April 15, 2014 (UTC)

News just in
"Hello,

Thanks for contacting Wikia.

After reviewing the situation in question, I have gone ahead and destroyed an account nest belonging to this user and then globally blocked their IPs from Wikia for a time. Hope this helps and we appreciate you bringing this to our attention.

Director of Technical Support" Whipsnade (talk) 01:10, April 16, 2014 (UTC)

surprise of meaux
two small questions.

had the attempt of prince of conde to capture Charles IX what would have been the outcome for both france and western europe with the huguenots coming into a stronger position.

and second could bohemia have successfully liberated itself from austrian power giving the right oppurtunity in the 16th and 17th century.

With Blood and Iron (talk) 12:50, April 16, 2014 (UTC)

i know that it would delay the inevitable but i was reffering more to the whole dutch revolt catholic league etc etc how would it effect those issues.

and i was reffering largely to the fact that the bohemian nobility were wary of the hapsburgs  like in the bohemian revolt 1618 revolt With Blood and Iron (talk) 22:12, April 17, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Rollbacks
Okay, LG, I will be more careful later. I promise I will getting better and better for doing my duty :D

FirstStooge (talk) 13:04, April 16, 2014 (UTC)

Byzantine Reconquest
Sorry I could say that to put ASB Byzantine Reconquest? AA1918 (talk) 06:12, April 20, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Overall Response
Thank you for the replies. Can't say that I'm happy with the big "no" to every single idea I've worked on over these past months, but I'll get over it in time. But to give my final word on some:

I wasn't even expecting a response for VH because (to be honest) I thought the issue was over. I did mention previously that the timeline is ASB, and there is nothing I can do to change this. That I doubt keeping the USSR or Yugoslavia alive and unified is going to make much of a difference. I honestly thought that you not responding to this was that you couldn't argue against this. Didn't realize this was part of your long recess.

My overall reasoning for Quebec would've been that the USSR's support for sovereignty within its borders would spur more support from those living in Quebec. I also considered that how quickly the west were supportive of the areas leaving the USSR, that Moscow would get revenge and do the same with Quebec (in a manner of speaking). Plus from what I've read about it, it appears unlikely that either Canada or Quebec would go to war with each other, and it would eventually lead to a global recognition of Quebec over time.

The DD stuff is by far the most heartbreaking for me, especially since these are the most recent ideas I had. But I guess you can chalk this up to be not being too involved in the timeline to even understand some of what you meant here. If you don't mind me adding questions to this.


 * Why would water travel be difficult for the OL (which would be a maritime nation) to establish trading posts in NJ? I could understand if this were much farther or that distance on land, but NJ and water?


 * The OL would only claim territories north of Delmarva, which from what I can see holds no claims to the area in question. Given what I see as good relations, why would a border dispute emerge?


 * "NJ is also more damaged, and picked over, by this time." "What amounts to bandits." So you are telling me that people still live in these areas? I would've assumed they've either left decades ago or would've died off by now. Thereby leaving the area open for resettlement. Is this the case everywhere?


 * Given that VT virtually claims all of Connecticut and Rhode Island, wouldn't the OL be screwed either way in attempting to establish anything on the coast? This especially if Delmarva is going to "complain" over any OL claim to untouched NJ.


 * Wouldn't VT see interest in a potential cooperation project for New Haven as I (think I) stated on my sandbox. Where the OL administers the region and both work to reconstruct the area (maybe even establish some type of link giving VT physical access to NH)?

-- 14:07, April 22, 2014 (UTC)

Henry of Prussia
a small quetion ive been reading up on frederick the great and on his family, while Freiric william II was a carefree and inept ruler it appears his brother was quite the opposite and Frederick the great had high hopes for him, if he had never caught small pox could prussia have kept out of trouble after frederick's death with either henry being the real power behind the throne or in the case of something happening to william as king ? With Blood and Iron (talk) 15:08, April 25, 2014 (UTC)

im asking largely because i see my timeline the disaster of 1805 as a dead end it has to many loose ends.

nevermind ive worked out my new timeline though it is alot earlier. With Blood and Iron (talk) 16:40, April 25, 2014 (UTC)

Map Game Categories
My apologies for inadvertently wasting your time, I'll make sure it won't happen again. I've seen how you fixed everything, so I'll remember to leave the parentheses out next time around. --NFSreloaded (talk) 13:00, April 26, 2014 (UTC)

Commonwealth of Susquehanna
Hey, LG, hope u r doing well. I saw ur comment on my page, and I do have my reasons. Feel free to correct me if I am incorrect or u find otherwise!

1. At the time of DD, Berwick had a train manufacturing company in it. During WWII the US government had them manufacture tanks. The equipment was abandoned b/c it was more expensive to remove it, and the tanks were obsolete. The steel comes from the steel mills, everything else (except machine guns) will be imported. They will only make like 1 a month for now. I only plan to have the nation actually operate 4 tanks, and only 3 active, one reserve.

2. There is a small group of people (scattered about) that, for decades, have made custom firearms. I figured after 30ish years they may be able to hand make some weapons, and ammunition.

Daeseunglim (talk)

Re:Stuff
Man you really need to archive your talkpage. This will be the 365th heading - as many as days in a whole year! :P

I hope everything turned out for the best in regards with your personal matters. All's well that end's well, as they say.

Hmm, I thought the invasion of the OFS was kinda stupid too. I shall remove it when I return to DD in force (after exams which finish in June).

I was hoping the general outlook would not be so bad, lol. I was confused as to what you meant by "the water was gone". Are you referring to the fact the water in the new regions of extra rainfall - such as the Chad region and the outback?

I would appreciate it if you could help me work on my ideas and make it more plausible. I really think some of the ideas I had there were gold. So let's start on the major points then: I really hope that my ideas could still in some form be used for the timeline. :L  Imp (Say Hi?!) 14:30, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Why could Dorset not work as the way I have put it? Heavier taxation leads to calls for independence, and as a result of the French supporting the Americans the British would try to work on ensuring the French do not get their hands on any more land in Greenland and thus neglect Dorset. Then Dorset goes on its merry way at the end of the war where they could become some sort of American protectorate.
 * 2) What was wrong with my plans for Russia? I was thinking instead of all those local tribes in Siberia, Slavs would eventually take over the lands and push them out of their regions. These Slavs would develop slightly differently on their own but in the end when more Slavs come there might be some bloodshed but eventually the Slavs would realise they are better together thus faster colonisation of land. Or the alternative is that most feel highly threatened and move eastward - eventually migrating into Alyeska and helping to populate the lands while Western Slavs populate the lands in Siberia.
 * 3) There is pretty much no Spain in the equation. I have Denmark in play.
 * 4) Now I did have a problem with making the Napoleonic Wars and their results in Greenland more plausible. If you could help me out on this it would be great.

Ok now that was more helpful. But seriously, archive!

I have no problem with the water not going into deserts and such and the majority of it remaining around Greenland. Arctic ice would probably melt and help the soil in regions of Canada and Siberia.

So the New Dorset colony would not rebel? Would it be comparable to something like New South Wales in its early days?

I dunno LG. Norway and Sweden are Arctic powers which would probably get preference over the whole matter and establish colonies in the region. For Spain I can only see a very small slice of coast, if anything at all.

No, the Soviets don't control all the former Russian colonies, although I have the feeling you are implying about its control over Donskoya? If so, well I would then change the history of Donskoya accordingly - making it more of a short-lived Communist government. And what were the reasons for Alaska not being held onto? Correct me if I am wrong, but could the Russians not get to Alaska over the north from somewhere like Murmansk - at least in the summer? They could establish into a penal colony and we could have a bit of luck have some gold discovered or something. But making it into a penal colony would still give it quite a population and would lead to it having much more people than OTL.

I was referring to tribal movements in like pre historical time unto the 5-6th centuries AD. If droughts occur, then this could help them migrate in greater numbers - could it not? And increased droughts only multiplying this effect? Of course Russians would still migrate eastward, but it would mean there would ne a greater population of people already present who would not be other different types of tribes or ethnicities, but Slavic (western) which could eventually be integrated into Russian society with ease.

Oh definately. The British get most of it because they are the most capable to do so, really. I still am not sure about Iberian colonies. And by the Napoleonic Wars, you mean they get stripped of all their colonies in the "New World" correct? So Louisville would not exist - or if it did it would be like Quebec?

We will get to WWII eventually. :P  Imp (Say Hi?!) 12:50, April 29, 2014 (UTC)

Soil more or less unchanged. I think slightly better - it would be good for future colonisers. But it won't do much for the natives though so not that much of a change really.

Well, if it is like other British colonies - then I am not sure with Chris' idea of splitting them into two colonies. I think I will keep the British colonies in the region into one state - but as a Federation of like 6 states or something.

Could Norway still stay a part of Sweden? And if Norway does break away, would they still get their own colony - I have never understood how they would manage to do so. I think whatever colony would be established would belong to the Swedes.

Which map are you referring to? The old one or my maps? If the new one - I would only be willing to give Spain a colony the size of Grinella, no larger. Easier to colonise or not - in the days of Spanish glory I would expect them to focus on the resource rich Americas more than "cold" Greenland.

No communist movements you say? In the earlier version of the timeline all Russian possessions fell to Commies - was my first change to make Romanova into a Russian Empire successor. I think there would be a few small uprising - something like Finland, but all would be crushed and peace restored.

So Alaska would still be sold? No way to keep Alaska in Russian hands? If there is then please do tell me lol, I would prefer it to be Russian for once. And why no gold? All they really needed was luck - was it not?

I would really think Louisville would be returned in a much smaller size, especially toward its northern border. I don't think the Russians would give up on such an opportunity to expand their holdings on Greenland. So the colony would be returned, but in a smaller size.

On a sidenote - I would think the population of many new world nations such as America would be lower due to the fact Ukrainians and Russians would migrate to the colonies rather than the US or Canada. Logic behind this is although the Russian Empire might be doing stuff like kicking out people or forcing people like the Jews to move - the Russian-American/Greenland Company would just look for profits and thus would see the transportation of Russian Jews and such to its lands as profitable. The colonies would definately be more lax in terms of all this - serfdom pretty much doesn't even exist so I would reckon it would pretty much become a safe haven for those running from the Russian Empire.

I think Greenland should be different compared to what it currently is. Imp (Say Hi?!) 19:57, April 30, 2014 (UTC)

Ah, well something is always better than nothing I guess.

I see. But eventually there could be a referendum in the same way with what happened in Australia correct? It is quite similar thinking about it - but instead of a lake in Australia there is the outback. I imagine this to take place sometime around 1920s, when it would be easier to keep the two regions in contact with one another and such. Plus, do you think Ross City should be where New Sussex? I never really liked the location of the city, and I guess if it is a coastal one and that too on its southern tip then Ross would become by far the largest city on the island.

I see, Norway and Sweden go their own way then. And I think two different colonies then - one for Norway and one for Sweden

LG that is so harsh. :'(

But on a more serious note - those maps were never official but I did think they could have worked. I am making a map with the different borders I think would be more logical. And what resources are we talking about? Furs?

Neighbours? I had this idea of perhaps having the British carve out a new dominion on the west coast of North America - something like Cascadia - and I think that they could be the ones buying Alaska this time. Cascadia would be pretty British influenced - more so than Canada. The Russians would probably be thinking something like "why go to war over it with the Brits if they will buy it for a good price?" and thus would think they have earned a profit when they sell it off.

I see. Well no gold I guess for the Russians.

I really have to differ with the view that the French would be more established. If anything they would still be focus on America and would still lose a lot of land in Greenland if the Seven Years War has any impact on the island. Plus, the Russians were in Greenland since the late 17th century so it would give them plenty time to gain influence on the lands. Therefore the French colony will be one of the smaller ones on another map I am readying.

Indeed. Thus there would be roughly no problems with keeping the monarchy in the region.

Wait, why would the new world populations not be lower? I would definately think the Russian and Ukrainian populations would be lower, there is no doubt.

And maybe I could not change Greenland as much as I had planned to, but I still plan to change various things. And how is it against the rules? By all rights it is my timeline, with the former author's permission to change whatever I would like changed, even though the change will now be significantly less drastic as I had planned. But still some changes. :P  Imp (Say Hi?!) 16:00, May 2, 2014 (UTC)

I guess I see your point, but there are still various land links present. And to be honest - there really is not much of a difference between the Australian and New Zealander cultures - I think if conditions had played out slightly differently there could perhaps have been a larger Federation of those two. But that is a different issue completely.

The coast are still relatively similar - add to the point that the colony on Greenland is much smaller than Australia, I think it would be maintaining contact in the 6 Australian colonies before Federalisation.

I'll move it to the inlet which falls right in the middle of Forbisher and New Sussex, that seems to be a good position. I'll move Elisabeth to the OTL position of Nuuk - that seems to be a much more locgical position for it too. Ross City's current position, I'm renaming that city Inverurie. I'll probably change the name Hudson too - its ok in Canada for me.

Ok I think I get you about this. So it pretty much starts out as Denmark-Norway's colony, and when Norway is transferred to the Swedes, so the the Norwiegen speaking portion? So the most I would get from Sweden would be a few colonists while it predominantly remains a Norweigen-speaking colony? So no Sweden after all - which I don't know how I feel about it considering they are the most densly populated state in the Nordic region.

Actually it was occupied by the Americans in WWII when they used it as a base to fight against the Nazis on Greenland and to launch aircraft and such - pretty much what they used Iceland for in OTL. So that is probably going I guess.

Oh, so quite useful resources. But I think that would take time to find - initially it would be furs.

I think I'll let the Russians hold the colony till a further date than OTL, but they will sell it in the end I guess. Could Japan be an option?

No Cascadia then.

They do. But to be fair for their Imperial ambitions getting a solid foot in Greenland would be a huge boost. I think Alaska would be neglected and smaller overall - Yukon and stuff would be bigger.

Fine, I'll look to make the French colony larger than what it currently is on my map.

Probably true actually. The Romanovs would most likely be either outright Capitalists or follow the Nordic model.

Ok, I'll keep the numbers heading to America roughly the same. I think a lot of Ukrainians would head out too, so that allows for a smaller Ukraine overall.

I think rain and stuff would make a lot of difference with that land. The rocks would be eroded and would make the lands very fertile with all the minerals beign deposited into the soil and such.

I think that rule should really be amended. I would suggest the old author should be given some power at the start when he could either state that the norm be followed or the new author can do as he pleases with the Timeline.

I'll keep the coastline part in mind. Back to paint I go...

You know I hate the fact I have to stick with OTL people. Things like this would have probably butterflied into something different overall. For one I don't want someone like Stalin and even if there is a Stalin - I want him to be more moderate. Some estimates put the number of people he killed at around 50 million (this is apart from the Second World War) - without him not only would the population of Russia be much higher but Russians could flee to Greenland in much much larger numbers - plus Siberia would be a lot more populated.

Its the same thing with Hitler. Do I really need to have him? I could have someone else start up World War II and such but why is it not possible to change people and their attitudes. Lurk made a post on this exact subject, so your response would be appreciated.

Pretty cool title, will keep it at that - doesn't really need to be changed.

Ok, so ability for promotions. All pretty cool. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 17:46, May 11, 2014 (UTC)

Re: CoS
Thank u for clarifying ur position. I will edit my page ASAP (it may be a few days). And my thing about the armored vehicles is them attacking the raiders, and more contact with unfriendly nations. I will add the armored cars. Daeseunglim (talk)

Re:Warning
I too have had enough of this. But it is not biased, everything I've written up to this point is based directly off OTL tactics and numbers. Just as some have said its biased, others have told me its not, instead perfectly plausible. I have continualy explained my reasoning, I have consistently explained my sources, while your whole reasoning is "A-H is incompetent, Italy is Godlike". If you can please look pass your own bias, you too would see that its fine. But at least hold off judgement until I have more written.

I am that guy (talk) 15:01, April 28, 2014 (UTC)

Lag, you seem like a swell guy, and very knowledgable. But I did probably a weeks worth of research for that war, and that's the result I came up with. I explained my position consistently, and yet it seems you refuse to see it. I've asked about this on chat constantly, and people agree that its plausible. You insist that all my sources showing A-H outnumbering Italy are wrong, yet I fail to find any. Here's what I'm going to do, I'm going to put all my sources on the portal page, and if you don't come up with some site or whatever which disproves it all, I will remove the unnecessary tag and we can continue this until you see reality.

I am that guy (talk) 16:30, April 29, 2014 (UTC)

LG, it seems you haven't taken it up. People have told me its plausible, admins have told me its plausible. I would greatly appreciate it if you can please give me sources of yours, as I've done for you. I've proven that Austria-Hungary wasn't as incompetent as you previously made them out to be. But it seems the only way you'd think its plausible is for A-H to get curb stomped by the much more incompetent Italian army. So please, just do this, give me some sources, prove me wrong. At 12:30 US EST tomorrow, though, I will remove that tag.

I am that guy (talk) 16:27, April 30, 2014 (UTC)

RE:Clean Ups
Sure thing. Mscoree (talk) 23:16, April 29, 2014 (UTC)

ASB Biased?
Hi there Lordganon. I gather the ASB tag is for things you find to be out of the scope of reality, after adding ASB: biased category to my page New Alliances would you mind letting me know just what you found to be unrealistic/biased. I have edited a couple of lines that I saw that could have been construed as biased (about UK being dominant superpower) but in all fairness they were more a result of just wanting to get my ideas down (creative process).

' DK Wolf 27 ' Holonet Channel  20:52, April 30, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Congratulations
Was thinking about whether or not to make this a new heading or not, since you seem to have plenty on this page. :P

Thank you LG. I quite like the title I have been given. Trying to find out what it means, I have arrived on two possible meanings: it could either mean diplomat of the eastern star or the star diplomat of the east. Either is pretty cool lol. If I wanted to, I could add to my title, yes?

And powers available as Brass is very similar to that available as a Leut correct?

Adjust user rankings? MWAHAHAHA, LG I will take the top spot now :P

But thank you again and I hope I can keep doing the wiki some good. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 17:40, May 2, 2014 (UTC)

You confuse me, LG
As the title says, you confuse me. I would've figured a man of your stature would jump on the chance to prove himself right. I give my explanations, you don't respond. I give my sources, you refuse to share yours. What's the problem? I am that guy (talk) 19:10, May 2, 2014 (UTC)

-sigh-

You have refused to give me sources of yours, whereas I've given you a dozen of mine. I try to engage in conversation, you blow it off. If you're not going to talk and try to back your argument up, I would appreciate it if you leave my timeline alone and let me work on it.

Good day,

I am that guy (talk) 16:52, May 3, 2014 (UTC)

LG, do you even see these? I bring up sources, I explain my decisions in detail, while you refuse to even respond to these messages. Believe me, before I went further into the details of WWI, I was expecting to find that Italy smashed A-H at every turn. I found that A-H military was on par or exceeded Italy's military power, and found that they outnumbered Italy by as much as over a million. All the while, you label my timeline ASB because of your own bias against A-H, mistakenly believing that they lacked the ability to win a war, meanwhile the Italian army was worst than theirs. I ask you to go ahead and set out to prove me wrong, I'm not one to simply take a persons word for it. If you don't give me sources, I will remove it this time Tuesday. If you can't, accept it, move on, and please leave me alone.

I am that guy (talk) 02:07, May 5, 2014 (UTC)

Why do you do this? You refuse to give sources or even simply engage in a dialogue. Instead you resort to warnings, preferring those over having to prove your message. What is your problem with what I'm asking? All I want is sources of yours, prove your point. Why can't you do that? Like I've stated before, I would've figured a man of your stature, respect, and position would jump on the chance to point to sources backing his points up.

I am that guy (talk) 02:27, May 6, 2014 (UTC)

Seriously, what is your problem with citing sources, or even having a discussion? I am that guy (talk) 19:39, May 6, 2014 (UTC)

Woah, ok, I think you two need to calm down. If there's a dispute, IATG, don't just remove the tag. Bring it to the community (not the TSPTF page). Let them adjudicate...

23:06, May 6, 2014 (UTC)

Please, stay calm. There is no need for such discussions to result in the banning of a user. Imp (Say Hi?!) 23:10, May 6, 2014 (UTC)

I have asked people on chat several times, many tell me what I've done is plausible. I am that guy (talk) 23:31, May 6, 2014 (UTC)

I said "community", not "place where people go when they're drunk or bored".

23:40, May 6, 2014 (UTC)

Discrepancy
In DD: 1983, how did Lexington, Kentucky (1983: Doomsday) survive (Pop: 400,000+); but both Scranton, PA (Pop: 76,000 +/-), and Wilks-Barre, PA (Pop: 46,000 +/-) were destroyed. Lexington has a much higher strategic value that both Scranton and Wilks Barre. Daeseunglim (talk)

Thanks
Ok, thanks for clearing that up with me! I didn't realize that Lexington didn't have industry and was smaller! I had thought it had a large military base near the city. Thanks for clearing that up! Daeseunglim (talk)

Could you hop onto chat real quick? 07:11, May 8, 2014 (UTC)

Press Enterprise
I am composing a list of "confirmed" targets (ie: strikes they saw/heard) and assumed strikes (Major cities, military bases). The list is going to be incomplete compared to the actual list, and have some incorrect strikes too (ie Toledo, Ohio). Daeseunglim (talk)

Duplication
I Did Not Duplicate File: TE New Netherlands.jpg is just Found it Randomly when i was at Google Images. Thank YouLikercat (talk) 15:07, May 10, 2014 (UTC)

CoS National Guard
How many planes do u think? And why the P-38 Lightning? Just curious. Daeseunglim (talk)

Not sure what to make of this
I'm not really sure what to make of this. Topics I though I understood enough on and projects I spend days (if not months) on can be discredited in only a few sentences. It's very frustrating and heartbreaking to go through this in almost every new idea I explore, and I really don't know what I'm doing wrong.

Please forgive me but I just need to vent out a little. But with my ideas for GWS (topics I though I had decent understanding in and had been working on and off for months) being turned upside-down and virtually made pointless in all areas, I'm not really sure what I'm doing anymore. How is it that you have encyclopedic information on almost everything? I really don't know what to do anymore. -- 17:36, May 13, 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you, and again I do apologize. Just needed to vent a little. I know you have no intention of upsetting me, but since you are the only one who really critiques me it does get annoying for me to keep hitting walls like this.


 * I would hope I'd be getting better but it appears I still have a way to go, even on topics I thought I knew. To work out much of these topics in my head while offline, spending days and possibly months on, only to be shown as wrong. It can really be a downer. Especially with Antarctica, I though I knew more. I really don't know, now I have to rethink my whole strategy and maps, which will take a while to find what works. I also would've swore that Norway/Sweden wouldn't even get there in "colonial" numbers, but now I feel really upside down. I guess I have faulty information.


 * I'll play around a little bit more and post it when I'm ready, and do hope this time it will work out. I do thank you gain for hearing me out. I do apologize again, I do hope I haven't upset you in the process. -- 02:55, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

Badges
Understood. My wrong. --JorgeGG (talk) 18:22, May 13, 2014 (UTC)

Request
With the I put of others, I've added two pre-major POD, PODs. I have been told by others that it resolves their issues, but I would like your opinion and let me take the tag off once and for all. I am that guy (talk) 05:44, May 14, 2014 (UTC)

What do I need to do? What the heck do I need to do? I put up a blog post in the hopes of getting you involved, which almost everyone else did, but you didn't. What suggestions do you have?I am that guy (talk) 18:44, May 14, 2014 (UTC)

And BTW, how does passing German-style military reforms make it implausible?I am that guy (talk) 05:31, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

I'm trying to see your point, LG, but through this whole thing you've refused to engage in discussion. I made that blog post, here, to lay out my argument in a basic format. I then hoped you would comment, make your case. But you didn't. What's so wrong with it? I am that guy (talk) 15:04, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

Wow, first off, I want to say, you are so cool. Over 70,000 edits!!! That's so awesome! Anyways, my name is Ginger2002, and I was wondering if you can tell me how you became a lieutanant in this. Thanks!

Don't think I don't care for your argument, I do, really.

I don't see anything preventing A-H from implementing military reforms, especially considering the Austrian side of the government was responsible for military matters. The prospect of reforming the army along German (and by extent, Prussian) lines isn't unimaginable, considering Prussia beat Denmark, Austria, and France all in less than a decade. I know the reforms wouldn't be complete by 1915, but they would be largely in place by then.

I am that guy (talk) 01:32, May 18, 2014 (UTC)

You are right about the military control, that was my mistake.

Even still, I don't see how the minorities, especially the Hungarians, would get "inflamed" by it. If anything, I would think the Hungarians would be backing the reforms, help A-H become more competitive militarily in Europe.

As for the other minorities, I don't see them coming in major opposition. The biggest problem with A-H was only the ethnic Germans and Hungarians held any political say-so. The lack of representation, combined with four years of war was what lead to their downfall at the end of WWI. But in my TL, I can see the minorities getting behind it if the government had some sort of "Good for the many over the good of the few" (or something like that) public relations campaign, get them behind the reforms.

And as for the reforms, the Prussians figured them out by themselves, and well over a century before my POD. With so much time to refine them, when the Austrians ask for assistance in reforming their military, the Germans come in and (in simplified terms) tell them "that goes there, this goes here, and that goes over there". Let's also not forget there would be an easier time implementing reforms in the early 1900s than the 1700s, a lot of advances made between those.

I am that guy (talk) 13:47, May 20, 2014 (UTC)

Ok, so I guess I can throw that out.

This just brings me back to the original argument, where you were adament A-H would get curb stomped by Italy.

I hope you at least looked at my arguments, and those of others, on the blog post I put up. And through sources (which I provided on the portal page) I found out that, not only did A-H have a quantity advantage, A-H also had a quality advantage. I was very thorough in my research on that portion, and it appears that the incompetence of A-H is exaggerated.

The Austrians managed to hold off Italy for the majority of the war, beating them on many occasions without German assistance. They also did this whilst a large portion of their army was sent to fight Russia, Serbia, and Romania. It was only until the later stages of the war, and with reinforcements from other allied powers, did Italy begin winning decisive victories. Of course, by this time A-H was going through internal struggles, and the defeats only hastened their down fall.

With superior numbers, and no need to divert troops to separate fronts, as well as a better quality army than that of Italy, and a much shorter war, plus if they managed to outthink the Italians (like I explained in the TL), it seems unlikely that Italy would emerge victorious.

I am that guy (talk) 17:29, May 22, 2014 (UTC)

I know some agree with the tag currently, and I have been revising my TL with their suggestions.

You exaggerate Italys capabilities, it had all its forces focused on A-H (who was divided between three separate fronts) and could only win once allied reinforcements arrived. And to compare Italys army to Russias is like comparing apples to oranges, Russia held a much larger, and a higher quality army.

The tactic I used is hardly "god-mode". Attacking where they're weakest? Its been used countless times throughout history to achieve victory. I don't see how you think that is a "god-mode" tactic.

Italy was equal one just about everything else, in terms of economic and industrial strength. Franz Ferdinand, who was a large supporter of the navy, could push for a more active naval role, while Italy remained timid like otl. Also, left-wing and pro-entente movements, which were largely responsible for the demise of A-H, don't rise up and become a powerful force. The resistance provisional governments that rise in otl don't, and international backing for them is nonexistent, therefore minimizing the unrest. And as for Italy pushing the minorities into rebellion, they didn't take the chance otl, and I don't see them taking it atl.

I am that guy (talk) 17:40, May 27, 2014 (UTC)

I have since revisited the reforms, as I believe they can solve some of your concerns. I am that guy (talk) 01:51, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * One major problem with A-H was the inadequacy of the high command. One of the reforms reorganizes the high command into a more competent structure. German advisors are brought in and assist in implicating the reform.
 * Homogeneous ethnic units are created, redistributing soldiers so, for instance, a Serb regiment under a Serb colonel. Any and all General positions are held by Austrians and Hungarians exclusively. This is an attempt to keep the individual ethnic groups happy, as Austria-Hungary and the Austrian empire before it, had histories of ethnic troubles.
 * Then the is a redesign of the mobilization process. During the Austro-Prussian war, Prussia managed to mobilize its army a lot faster than Austria because it had multiple rallying points, were troops can organize locally before heading to war. Austria had all its troops come to a single point, where the armies are mobilized before heading to the front. Since I found no mention of A-H adopting a different method, I figured they stick with the old system.

Italy was struggling during the course of the war. They made little to no head way for the first year and a half. Please keep in mind this is only against a fraction of the Austrian army, while the majority was focused against Serbia, Romania, and Russia. Their only real progress was in late 1916, going into 1917, when A-H began having minority troubles. This attack was then later pushed back with reinforcements from the concluded Eastern Front. Germany did have support, but it was only about four divisions. Plus, the Italian commander was known for his harsh discipline, and outdated tactics, which increased the Italian losses, and lowered the Italian morale.

As for the naval forces, this is more personal. I'm a big fan of dreadnoughts, I build models routinely. I era search the ships I build, I know their specs, I know their firepower, I know their protection, I know their speed. I know how many sister ships they had, and how many ships in general were in service with the particular navy at the time. All the numbers I counted myself, everyone of those were in service at the start, or during the course, of my war. There were a few quality superiorities, for instance: Austria had superior ships, for instance: the SMS Tegetthoff had two forward facing 12-inch triple turrets, and two rear-facing, both in the super-firing position. The Italian battleship Dante Aleghieri also had two forward and rear facing 12-inch triple turrets, but there was only one facing directly fore or aft, the other were situated amidship, with the forward facing turret staring at the back of the forward superstructure. This means the ships would have to turn to port or starboard to allow the second forward facing turret to fire, allowing the enemy a larger target. Meanwhile, the Tegetthoff could send down range the same firepower, while allowing a smaller cross-section. The Italians only had one other battleship operational in February, 1915, the Leonardo da Vinci, which had a reduced armament of only two triple, and two double, 12-inch turrets. While at this time, Austria would have four operational dreadnoughts, with a larger class of ships nearing ready to be laid down.

Attacking where the enemy is weakest isn't the most complicated tactic. "Guys, there's less of them over there, how about we attack there?"

How would the Hungarians be angry? They would have the same amount of power.

Rebels? Not if the minorities are happy, or at least not angry enough to rebel.

Mobilization is key, get a prepared army to the front while the other guy is busy getting his men together.

I am that guy (talk) 23:48, May 30, 2014 (UTC)

Funny, cause I see that A-H had several million soldiers committed to the Balkans and Russia.

Not really, I ask you to look up Luigi Cadorna, he's who I'm talking about.

You are mistaken in that Italy had a more modern pre-dreadnought fleet, that actually belongs to the Austrian Radetzky-class pre-dreadnoughts, the first of which was launched in 1909 and commissioned in 1911, while the first of Italy's last and most modern pre-dreadnought class, the Regina Elena was launched in 1904 and commissioned in 1907. Yes, they had more under construction, and I had those enter the war upon their completion.

Any real experience gained in the war against the ottomans would be minimal. They're fleet was a complete wreck, they're most powerful ships were twenty year old pre-dreadnoughts bought from Germany. In this time, when naval technology was getting more advanced by the month, they didn't stand a chance. Heck, the ottomans knew this and kept them in harbor for the war, and fielded cruisers and gunboats, of course Italy's navy will win, just about any navy in the world at this time could win in that situation. When faced with a more modern navy, like that of Austria, I bet the Italians would go in expecting the same result of that with the ottomans, but forgot Austria has much more powerful ships. And I can't find where Italy has more cruisers and torpedo boats, mind pointing me to where you found that?

In ATL, the war doesn't last more than a year, well within that timeframe.

A-H was already mobilized by the time war was declared in ATL, in response to Italy's threats.

I simplified it. Here it is drawn out:
 * Italy diverts troops from near the Swiss border and lake Garda in preparation for an attack on the Austrian near the Isonzo River.
 * Italys attack fails.
 * Austria reinforces the lines around lake Garda and attacks the weakened Italian lines.
 * Austria breaks through said lines and pushes forward, the Italian army in the area is too depleted to mount an effective defense.
 * With their supply lines to the east threatened, the Italian army begins to pull back into Italy proper.
 * When Austria finds out Italy is withdrawing, they press the attack.
 * The withdrawing Italians are caught off guard, and it turns into a route.
 * You know the rest.

A more central one, which Hungary still wields significant power in.

No, I don't think the minorities will be happy, of course not. It serves as a compromise, Austria knows their ethnic troubles and wants to subdue them. Quickest solution: allow them control of their own people (still under the control of an Austrian or Hungarian General) and give them more say. They know the heir to the throne supports federalizing the empire, allowing them local control.

If Hungary knows the direness of the situation, you could see them get behind it.

I am that guy (talk) 20:18, May 31, 2014 (UTC)

a questions on 1700's
first would it have been possible for frederick to have a child if he had married Amelia of Great Britain. if not had Frederick William II died in childbirth, and his brother Henry of Prussia not falling ill could the prussian military have been in better shape for the french revolution.

The other matter is it possible for Nelson to have passed away prior to the french revolution or during one of the earlier naval battles of the war such as the fighting off the italian coast? or during the battle of the nile were he nearly did bite the dust. another possible solution i found is his ship sinks during the first anglo-maratha war ending his military career as a whole before it really begins.

thank you in advance for the help. With Blood and Iron (talk) 18:38, May 20, 2014 (UTC)

ummm ok and what would the ramifications of frederick, and amelia marrying, and having children, in terms of long term effects on prussia, their ambitions over silesia and bohemia, and the austrian war of succession. With Blood and Iron (talk) 17:43, May 22, 2014 (UTC)

well yes that much i thought  but more then that how would the british react to the austrian war of succession.With Blood and Iron (talk) 10:26, May 27, 2014 (UTC)

so bascly we would be looking at an an early diplomatic revolution oor just one big mess? with france siding with austria what would become of their alliance with spain, and with Bavaria who they backed for the throne.

With Blood and Iron (talk) 10:11, May 30, 2014 (UTC)

alright thanks.i have an idea of how im going to handle this war. but in the end austria will be greatly hurt by this war no? and for sides id guess france, spain, sicily,naples, and sardinia on one side. Britain, Prussia, and some minor german states on another. And Austria, with who ever is left in the hre, with the occasional support of russia. With Blood and Iron (talk) 10:55, May 31, 2014 (UTC)

Europe map in 1983:Doomsday
Why the map I made was removed? The other one is too little to read.Halliwellroad (talk) 13:19, May 21, 2014 (UTC)

Help with new TL
I need help with making a timeline about an earlier industrial revolution, but I have no idea what PoD it should have. Can you help me?GlobalConqueror (talk) 17:29, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

Another PMIII issue
Greetings, Lordganon. I'm a PMIII player and play as the Mughali-Marwari personal union, now, another player, who plays as the Indian nation of Bengal has used his friendly relations with a moderator to make all Indian nations suddenly unite. I don't usually do these things, but I myself believe, not only that this aid was bias, but I also believe that this is in comparison to the first war of the indian league against my nation a completely different situation as now there is an Indian nation that is in a personal union with the Mughal Empire and some of the nations of the Indian League which is more or less an institution that is used to keep the Mughals out of India would attempt to break the Bengali dominance. To keep it short(er), I would like you to state your opinion on this since you are the most unbiased person when PMIII is concerned. <font color="#00AAE4">Sky Green 24 19:56, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

P.S. Here is the link Talk:Principia Moderni III (Map Game)

"Unite Suddenly"? The Indian League has been going on for over fifty in game years now. The actions taken by NovaSims against the Indian states caused them to resent the Timurids/Mughals, and the Indian League was created to address that resentment. Since then, numerous proposals that have benefitted League nations economically and technologically have kept the League united on a basis other than warfare. Now, for friendly relations a moderator...I assume you mean FeudalPlague, the only mod to actually respond to a request to look at something I ask them to look at rather than "I'll do it later" with no results? Perhaps you should explain how Fed was consulted the night the war began, and how I have gone to MP numerous times at the founding and several proposals into the League. It was a completely different situation until you vassalized Jaisalmer. Your leader publically said he CANNOT control India, then you went about doing the exact same thing that caused the Indian nations to resent the Mughals in the first place, less than 20 years after getting all the Indian nations to give forgiveness to a wolf in sheeps clothing. Your Indian nation that is in personal union with the Mughals did not drop the Mughal Empire title, and willingly accepted himself as the Mughali Emperor, already making Indian nations suspicious. Now, you said on the discussion that you wanted an unbiased mod, and in lieu of patience for a mod to come on, you have sought to come to the leader of the TSPFT? What happened to waiting for an unbiased game mods opinion? While I completely respect Lordganon and his opinion, I cannot help but say that the reason we have the game mods is so that the TSPFT can do what they are normally supposed to do, rather than baby-sit map game arugments. I welcome Lordganon's opinion if he wishes to give it though. &#34;SO SAYETH THE EAGLE&#34; - Fascist Eagle ಠ_ಠ (talk)

Can we please not Bring these things to the HEAD OF TSPTF on his talk page when he usually only shows up on request of someone hes acquainted with, or by request of the moderators (so i believe) LG this is nothing you should be worried about and multiple people see no issues with this. They are not Map game Baby sitters and should not be treated as such. I will make sure this is handled by mods so you do not have too LG. As it stands What Eip said is also correct and this is not really a sudden thing India has done something like this before to evict the mughals and its not out of the realm of possibility for the game currently. If you feel the need to concern yourself with it i wont stop you, however if you decide to ignore this feel free too. Sky i believe is overreacting and is trying to blow this way out of proportion. This was looked at by multiple moderators which from what i know are Fedelede, Monster Pumpkin, and myself all of which see no issue with it and have signed off on this. Not to mention i told eip to consult other mods before fully going through with this. As far as i know he has done this and has talked to Fed and MP about this (id need to talk directly to them to verify) to erase any potential of me being biased by having 2 other mods balance this out

Hi LG,

Sorry for the late reply. I would love to contribute to Doomsday 1983, maybe I could do a small, insignificant country first? (like Fiji or something)

Doomsday - Rcc
Sorry for forgeting to sign off my posts.

I would mostly interested in an area related to technology, or a really small insignificant country that I could do (so that if I mess up I don't mess up big). You see, I haven't really contributed to a TL before (mostly do map games) so I'm kinda new to this stuff.

Delete rationale and copyright question
Hello, I see you tagged Six Kingdoms of New England with Delete citing "Derivative works are against the rules". I've come here to because I noticed something else, there are quite a large number of copyright infringements on this wiki; is this acceptable and yet derivative works are not? For an example, File:Breakfast at Tiffanys.jpg is used on Audrey Hepburn (1983: Doomsday) and it's use is indeed infringing upon it's copyright. I look forward to your reply, RogalDorn 06:55, June 2, 2014 (UTC)


 * LG, this man is simply a troll. Look at his name (RogalDorn), if you see carefully, it is like your username (Lordganon) spelled in different ways. FirstStooge (talk) 07:10, June 2, 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes, a troll with 18,000 edits on another wikia where I'm an admin and have been editing since 2010. RogalDorn 07:24, June 2, 2014 (UTC)

Thank You for Fixing My Articles
I just wanted to say thank you for fixing the unauthorized changes/additions to my Middle East articles. I am supposed to be getting emails if anything should arise with them and I had no idea of what had happened until this evening when I visited the site for the first time since early May. --Fxgentleman (talk) 01:37, June 3, 2014 (UTC)

Question
I was looking around and I saw you once played a map game. Just out of boredom and curiosity, why don't you play map games? Were all busy people, and sometimes I think Map Games are wastes of time... Saturn (Talk) 02:56, June 3, 2014 (UTC)

STOP DELETING MY SCORE PAGE!
If you want to delete my score page, at least tell me so that I could fix the page! Stop deleting! This is super anoying and redirecting my page to another is useless!!! I understand theat you are the Admin but please do not delete my score page and if you are not happy with it, tell me first at my talk page and I will change. Deleting the whole page is super annoying and I hope you can stop this!

Captainjohnrex (talk) 09:19, June 3, 2014 (UTC)

AmericaLoove Banned
AmericaLoove Will Be Banned Today Soon.........

BridgittLaura (talk) 12:18, June 4, 2014 (UTC)

a few more questions
a few things im interested in, what would have occured if napoleon had decided not ot invade Russia what would have been the effect in the long run on the chances of Napoleonic survival until the 1850's 1860's, and what would the effects of prolonged french lordship over western germany have on german nationalism, and the balance of power in Europe.

and second going back to the whole Frederick marrying Amelia thing. Would it have been possible that Britain would get drawn into the Polish war of succession which in turn could turn into a mess as the austrian succession issue opens up leaving a general state of dissary in European politics and Austria losing parts of its empire in the aftermath with an empowered Bavaria in South Germany and an empowered Prussia in Northern Germany until the issue of romantic nationalism arises.

With Blood and Iron (talk) 17:55, June 6, 2014 (UTC)

ummmm ok ib the assumption that russia is not invaded would there have been a sixth coalition? and once the french empire collapse could germany succeed in unification?With Blood and Iron (talk) 11:28, June 8, 2014 (UTC)

alright thanks for the help, i will probably eventually start my timelines, and i recieved permission from Tbguy to use some ideas from his timeline when working on my own though im only going to be taking some basic concepts not the core idea of his timeline. With Blood and Iron (talk) 16:32, June 9, 2014 (UTC)

Constable
Hey, I think Andy's nom period is over. Shouldn't he be a constable by now?

23:13, June 7, 2014 (UTC)

Is tonight one of those bored chat nights? :D 07:51, June 8, 2014 (UTC)

GWS: How am I doing?
I can see you've been pretty busy these past few weeks, so forgive me for messaging you. I've come up with several ideas for GWS (which I posted on the talk page) and I would love to get your two cents on them. Especially whether I'm on the right track or if I have to reorient them. Thank you. -- 01:45, June 9, 2014 (UTC)

What is our timeline policy?
I've noticed you've marked my alt hist for deletion for not being part of a timeline. I've read over this a couple times but still don't undertand what is meant by a timeline. Is that policy mentioned somewhere else? Thanks

RepublicofE (talk)

I changed the dates on my "Second World War" page. Is it satisfactory now?Doragon3 (talk) 05:08, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Hey Ganon. I cant write the Napa article because of RL stuff but also me focusing on my onw althist project. Sorry if this upsets but I cant.

Though 1983 doomsday is looking nice. Keep up the good work.

Shadowkiller91234567 (talk) 04:13, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

Greetings LG, i was wondering if you could allow me to get the constable status tomorrow around (June 13th around 23:30 UTC hours), in the User rights page i've seem to have no objector and since tomorrow is my two year anniversary i would like to have both around the same time, and i've been told i had to wait two weeks (Which i believe is fair) So could you consider if i could get it? please? Sine dei gloriem &#34;Ex Initio Terrae&#34; (talk) 15:14, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

Genghis Khan genealogy
I excuse myself for possibly bugging you, but I need information about something

I have been searching around for the missing links between Saray Mulk Khanum, wife of Timur and Chagatai Khan, son of Genghis Khan.

As far as I'm informed it goes:

Genghis Khan->Chagatai Khan->?->?->Chübei->Yasa'ur->Qazan Khan->Saray Mulk Khanum

Although this isn't of utter importance, if you do know anything, that would be great.

Thanks in advance.

Sincerely,

<font color="#00AAE4">Sky Green <font color="A00000">24 - Join the party  15:26, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

I Understand, I will not be making that mistake again. ALLONS-Y!!,Basically, RUN!! 15:45, June 14, 2014 (UTC)

LG, I appreciate your warning, but I have a few questions/comments. Firstly, what is wrong with categories for sporting leagues? We have more than 4 pages (which I believe is the minimum number of pages for a category), and it will break down the whole "Sports" category into more specific divisions.

Of course, you are in charge of keeping the wiki running smoothly, I just think that more categories that can relate specific pages from different TLs would be handy and helpful.

Second thing (and I think you know this, but hey): Sameva555 is 07sameva. They haven't abused it in the typical sockpuppet fashion, and its not hard to figure it out, but wanted to make sure you know (with the Ninja and Ratc problems, figured I could let you know one more person with multiple accounts). I think it is more or less like TOB.

Third thing: Why was I out of place to try and encourage discussion to develop guidelines for chat? I understand that in the Wiki's hierarchy, I am not the top dog, but I feel that, as I am on chat often enough, I have some responsiblity to making sure that this wiki is running as smoothly as possible.

Thanks, 00:27, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Novus Orbis Quo Violation FIXED!
It has come to my attention that "Novus Orbis Quo" is about to be deleated. I will try my best to change my pages that were violated such as (The Creation (Novus Orbis Quo), and Adam (Novus Orbis Quo)). So can you please deleate "The Creation" and "Adam" but not the intire timeline, please, I have so much planed for the timeline.

Thanks,

'--AllThingsCombined (talk) 23:12, June 16, 2014 (UTC)

Alternate 6th coalition
on the topic previously discussed. what are the coalition chances of winning the war against imperial france in 1813-14 taking ingto consideration unrest in certain areas of the french empire, their continued draining of resources in Spain, and the reformation of Prussia' army in the east along with the large numbers of russian and austrian forces. And more to the point what are napoleon's chances of coming out of the war with something resembling a victory. With Blood and Iron (talk) 12:19, June 17, 2014 (UTC)

alright thanks. and under the circumstances of austria staying out of the coalition? With Blood and Iron (talk) 13:06, June 17, 2014 (UTC)

alright so the french accept a peace offer which would be "moderate" they would probably make another bid for power in the mid 1800's yes? and this time the rivalry that exists between the 3 eastern european powers, may or may not play a role in their next bid yes?along with the americans if their relations with britain remain low? With Blood and Iron (talk) 14:22, June 17, 2014 (UTC)

Crisis of the third century
on another note what would have been the long term effects of a gothic victory at the battle of Naissus. Would the Roman empire failed to keep out the germanic host and eventually disintergrated into a series of successor states or would it have remained weakened only and eventually faded away at a later time? In either case what would be the effect on the Germanic people, and on the Gallic and Palmyrene Empires? With Blood and Iron (talk) 12:01, June 18, 2014 (UTC)

alright thanks ill see how things develop then in both cases. With Blood and Iron (talk) 15:56, June 20, 2014 (UTC)

another point about rome im curious about. could the western roman empire survived in any form or size post atilla the hun, and avoided being sacked once more or lossing power to the germanics? i dont expect them to keep the whole empire but atleast the italian peninsula? With Blood and Iron (talk) 01:16, June 22, 2014 (UTC)

Constable status
Its been two weeks (15 days to be exact) since i was elected as constable, i would like to receive said status now, If you may do so i would appreciate it, Thank you Sine dei gloriem &#34;Ex Initio Terrae&#34; (talk) 23:44, June 20, 2014 (UTC)

I know this might seem to much but I insist on being granted my constable status as soon as possible I've been elected fairly and the period of the nomination has finished Sine dei gloriem &#34;Ex Initio Terrae&#34; (talk) 21:12, June 21, 2014 (UTC)

RE: Categories
My apologies, I did not realize you were doing this. It was my understanding that the policy for Principia Moderni III was that all items have the main category as well to keep a record of all items in one category. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 13:39, June 21, 2014 (UTC)

Something Has Come Up
Title pretty much sums it all up. Something serious regarding a few users has come up and I'd rather not post it on a talk page. I know you'd rather visit a village in Africa infested with ebola, yellow fever, malaria, and a bad case of the common cold than visit chat, but I'd feel most comfortable telling you there, unless you have another idea. Is there a good time to talk to you via chat? CrimsonAssassin-See you, space cowboys 23:58, June 22, 2014 (UTC)

I might be able to make Friday night. I'd be on tomorrow, but I've got to make an overnight trip to my college. Registration for freshmen and all that. At any rate, thanks for getting back to me. CrimsonAssassin-See you, space cowboys 00:48, June 26, 2014 (UTC)

LoN, American Spring, UC, Etc.
Hey LG, I have a few questions/statements/etc.

I am assuming that, due to relations with most PA survivor states, the Commonwealth of Susquehanna has contact with both the LoN and the UC. Would it be able to join at least the UC, and have contact with the LoN, and possibly join in the future, when travel is easier?

The nation has contact with the USA, albeit sporadically. There are many pro-USA people in the nation. I am having the American Spring, independent from events (and 2 years later) from the western American Spring.

In regards to PA survivor states, would it be possible for a PA military/political alliance to form to strengthen the state to counteract Virginia, Superior, and Canada? Most states seem friendly with each other, they would all remain independent, but would be almost like a looser version of an NAU/NATO alliance.

Regards, Daeseunglim (talk)

Re: Talk Page
I just wanted to clarify what I did wrong. If it was the whole squirrel thing and unbanning Guns, we sorted that out, and I did apologize, because I know it was not proper behavior on my part. I just wanted to make sure it was that you were refering to and not something else, because if it was another action, I didn't intentionally do it. Thanks for your time. Cour *talk* 16:57, June 26, 2014 (UTC)

80.117.70.234 09:38, June 27, 2014 (UTC)Why do you keep blocking me I'm not inserting false information. I just want to add my ideas

79.0.180.173 07:51, June 28, 2014 (UTC)I'm not violating the rules do you understand that? Why I don't receive any messages from you ?stop blocking my pages. For example I edited the Caribbean countries on the 1983:Doomsday page of the World Country Profiles to include the RTFA and the United States Atlantic Remnant. Why there weren't on the list, eh? Put them on the list? Oh but you're not going to do it. Anyway now I'm going to do it and remember I AM NOT INSERTING FALSE INFORMATION AND I'M NOT VIOLATING THE RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Who is this guy and why have you banned him for a year? Is it because he made changes without at least creating an account. I'm assuming both these IP's are the same guy. Your immediate and without warning action is somewhat harsh, don't you think? I'm not saying he should not be stopped, but what are the protocols being followed? SouthWriter (talk) 17:59, June 28, 2014 (UTC)

80.180.88.232 10:46, June 29, 2014 (UTC)Thank you very much SouthWriter.Oh could you tell me how I create my account?


 * If you want to be taken seriously, create an account here: User login Page.  And whatever you do, don't threaten us like the anonymous fellow below did.  I am assuming that you are the from June 27th and not the guy from June 28.  The guy below may be that guy!  One threat was taken down by an administrator already. SouthWriter (talk) 22:56, June 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * 79.0.180.173 is not Ract 333 since it's from Padova, Veneto, Italy. He uses Telecom Italia.Whipsnade (talk) 00:24, July 2, 2014 (UTC)

Question
I see you labeled the LOS timeline as ASB-Biased and I was wondering how one might be able to fix these things, but you didn't leave anything for one to fix. So I'm just asking what's wrong with it? Blocky858 (talk) 08:51, July 2, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Warning
Feel free to warn me, but don't you claim that I don't know as much as I do. I know more about religions than the vast majority of religous people I meet. Also, my claims weren't really bigotted, as they were based of observation and basic history, not my gut feeling. Kurt Cobain&#39;s Haircut (talk)

My apologies. I get very heated and passionate when people bad mouth my country. SwankyJ (talk) 21:21, July 2, 2014 (UTC)

Sure you would've got to it at some point, but I think these two anons are the same person, or at the very least related in some way. They have editted the same pages in 83DD. I think he sincerely wants to contribute, so perhaps he just doesn't understand the wiki guidelines or the way the community TL works (thinks its open, perhaps). 09:56, July 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * 79.0.180.173 - Milan, Lombardy, Italy
 * 79.45.189.100 - Sienna, Tuscany, Italy

I'm Sure You'll Say No


I remember you mentioned at the time that Alaska could go to either Russia or the UK (which I chose the later). However, I've been reconsidering it remaining in Russia.

But before I get into this, I've had the idea of expanding Alaska a little bit to (pretty much) include the Yukon Territory (nothing on the scale as Russian America). My reasoning for which would be that with the US out of the picture (at least in regards to the Pacific Coast), the British may be more lenient towards Russia and allow them more territory. Nothing major, my idea would have the 130th meridian act as the border. I'll include a map, but this would pretty much be a straight line from Alaska's easternmost border OTL. So instead of a panhandle, it becomes a straight line which includes most of the Yukon (as well as small portions of BC and the NWT. I don't believe this particular area held any purpose for the British, so they shouldn't be too upset to loose it (which would be around the early 1800s). And without the US racing for territory here, the I doubt the British would see Russia as a threat to their interests in the Americas if they allow them more territory.

But since I like this idea, that means it's unworkable (seems to be the pattern here, lately). If this sounds farfetched, than could you suggest any alternative boundaries to this? If not, then I understand (was a long shot, anyway). -- 16:19, July 17, 2014 (UTC)

Eric4e Is Deleting My Warnings
Hello Lordganon, Long time no see, Recently Eric4e Has been Behaving like A Troll, Crossing out and Deleting My Messages at the TSPTF, It's Really Frustrating Because i wanted to Report him for Acting like a Troll, Not Behaving Nice to me, Shouting at me, removing my messages Every time at his talk page and TSPTF, He's Really Behaving Childishly, Harrasing me, Shouting at me Removing my Messages etc etc, so Please Give Him a Block or Ulitmate Warning, When i Checked at recent wikia Activity I was Angry when i found out he deleted my message at the TSPTF, please Report him.Likercat (talk) 11:57, July 8, 2014 (UTC)

Repeating paragraphs?
I've been wondering about this for quite some time.

Why are there paragraphs repeated th the same article over and over?

Bil

EoGuy (talk) 23:45, July 8, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for adding the category. Green47 (talk) 14:23, July 9, 2014 (UTC)

no diplomatic revolution
looking at a few things i have become curious what would have happened if the french and austrians hadn'tbecome allied in the early 1750swhat would the long term effects be on north america, the french revolution and and the 7 years war if it were even to occur.With Blood and Iron (talk) 18:52, July 9, 2014 (UTC)

im not so much interested in the europe situation but what north america would be like if it is plausible for the french to keep new france for a time. undoubtably the american revolution would occur and american expansionism would exist but for instance a kingdom or republic or queben would be interesting. but im unsure if if its possible as i know new france was considered a waste of resources to the french and only quebec really prospered. With Blood and Iron (talk) 11:29, July 10, 2014 (UTC)

Louis II and the Jagiellons
Hey, LG! Long time no talk. I hope you are doing well.

I had a question concerning Louis II of Hungary. In my timeline, I'm having it that when the Ottomans come to invade Hungary in the 1520s, Louis survives and the Ottomans are defeated. Now, in OTL Poland, Sigismund II Augustus has no heir, and helps to establish the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, since he was the last of the Jagiellons.

Now, I know basically nothing when it comes to the politics of western Europe at this point in time. My question is, in ATL, if Louis survives and bears a son (or two), could his heir somehow inherit Poland (and by extension Lithuania)? Could a union like this last? Would he perhaps divide the lands up to his sons, like Charles did with Spain? Thanks for the help.

P.S., I was googling some alternative historical maps a little while back, and I happened to come up to a company's website (from the Netherlands, I'm assuming?) that actually used your map of Africa from Doomsday. Thought you could use a laugh, lol. ChrisL123 (talk) 23:59, July 9, 2014 (UTC)

Whoops!
This is the creator of the Eurasian Union (Free World Order) page. It appears I have seriously misunderstood what this is about. Sorry!

I have already copied the code into a text file so feel free to delete the article.

Kaivêran Lugheidh (talk) 13:38, July 10, 2014 (UTC)

Lordganon
I'm sorry for duplicating, it won't happen again! I thought the files I duplicated didn't exist so I uploaded the duplicate files! I order you to unblock me now! --DannyCity (Talk)

95.236.177.72 12:53, July 17, 2014 (UTC)you won't give up,do you? ahah

I will not duplicate ever again. --DannyCity (Talk)

M113's, etc.
Hey LG, I did some digging around by talking with some ex army personnel. In Bloomsburg, there is a detachment from the PA 103rd Infantry. As far as I found from the Vietnam war up to the mid 2000's the unit was equip with M113's. In the mid 2000's they recieved Strykers. There are 20 armored vehicles there now, and I assume a similar number in 1983. But the numbers are less due to stripping them to repair the others. I am going to wait to change that until u reply. Daeseunglim (talk)

M113's
I messed up on the unit name. I've been there and its a armor reserve or something. But I was incorrect. There are soft skinned vehicles like jeeps, Humvee's, and cargo trucks, but the M113's are all in Scranton. There are a few M113's in Lewisburg, but that is State College controlled. Thanks for your help! Daeseunglim (talk)

Armor
Could Susquehanna have purchased a dozen APC's from someone or something like that? Daeseunglim (talk)

ANZS Commonwealth
Hey LG, I was reading around 1983: DD, and noticed that the ANZS Commonwealth was the former USS Carl Vincent. I looked around and found that the ship was on a shakedown cruise during Doomsday. My question is, the ship would have been a target by the Soviets. If u don't mind I would like to complete the ship's history because I feel it leaves a lot in the air.

Another thing is the fighter wing and armament. I would like permission to edit that to finish the article.

Thanks for your time and consideration.

Daeseunglim (talk)

Ms has been banned
I am aware you had told Ms that if he somehow gets banned for a third time you would permaban him, but this last ban was over a technicallity that (while i wont deny has basis) is more product of tension over the game PMIII, more than a reason that would deserve a permaban from the wikia, He's intentions were not to cause any problem nor to go against the admin (CrimsonAssassin), but instead to either ignore  (if you find it accurate for the situation) or to only extend his ban to a week if needed, but to avoid the permaban for now, as Crim's action was only to enforce his ruling rather than for a situation that would allow for a permaban, I'm hopefull that you will see this as i see it and disregard this "event" as only a problem in the communication between Crimson and Ms, the ban was due to Ms adding (or rather fixing) a sentence that made more sense and made more accurate a term in the page (Treaty of Paris (Principia Moderni III Map Game)) which Crimson had especifically said not to edit to anyone and warning that doing so would get them banned for a day. As i have previously said Ms intentions were not to cause problems nor to instigate a retaliation from Crimson but rather to fix a sentence poorly written by me

You may see for yourself here Treaty of Paris: History Sine dei gloriem &#34;Ex Initio Terrae&#34; (talk) 04:15, July 20, 2014 (UTC)

Want to chat? I really enjoyed it last time, and the state of wiki affairs has since shifted a good deal and you've been on for a little bit fixing stuff... well, I'll be there if you want to join me. :D 08:03, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Follow up: If you opt to not (which is totally fine) please let me know so that I can use your talk page to discuss the same issues. 08:08, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

It was quite nice speaking with you last night. I know I can speak for myself, as well as msot of the people on for that solid 3 hours that it was fun and entertaining. Best of health until we meet next. Also, best of luck for your upcoming USCIS interview. 16:36, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks again
So you fixed my mistake in removing the category. I guess we can work together after all. Best wishes. Green47 (talk) 11:13, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

82.54.183.162 12:47, July 21, 2014 (UTC)Why the World Country Profiles page has all of the states in 2011,why don't you update it? That is what I'm trying to do but you still block me. Unblock me now.THAT'S AN ORDER.WHAT KIND OF ADMINISTRATOR ARE YOU?PLEASE SOMEONE OVERTHROWS HIM,PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Honorary Stuffs
I know that perhaps the whole Government Simulation is silly to you, but after talking to you on chat I concluded that not only are you a hard-working contributor but also an awesome and nice individual, which is why I'd want to know if I can list you as an Honorary Comrade on the communist party page because I think you're the kind of person people should look up to. I'll understand if you don't want me to do it.

<font color="#00AAE4">Sky Green <font color="A00000">24 - Join the party  16:42, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Can, Again
So, since I've decided to keep both timelines, but contributing on one and keeping the other on the backburner, I'm wondering whether or not there's a template that would allow me to get that across that it's on hiatus?

Also, if you enter into an agreement to co-author a timeline, is that considered your timeline or something you contribute to?

A bit of a personal question, but why, if you consider yourself a Canadian, do you support Albertan seperatism?

Please ignore the edits I made to your page. I transferred all of my questions to my new, old timeline, so they can be answered there when you have the time.

Thanks!

Canuck2012 (talk) 03:23, July 23, 2014 (UTC)Canuck2012

80.117.31.34 12:01, July 24, 2014 (UTC)Stop Blocking Me Lordganon, and remember when the block will be lifted, i'll be there again.

CoS ARNG
Hey LG, I was looking around the internet and realized. Would it be more likely that Susquehanna used the M16 over the M1 Garand or the M1917, because the M16 was standard issue by 1983. I just wanted your opinion on it. If there are no issues, I plan to remove the M1 and the M1917 and replace it with the M16. Daeseunglim (talk)

Category Question


Just wanted to check with you first before incorrectly categorizing something. What is the correct category for calligraphy? For example what would the image on the right be categorized as? Let me know what you think. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 14:52, July 29, 2014 (UTC)

Kanjorski
Actually, he has lived in Nanicoke for his whole life as far as I have found. It is a Suburb of Wilkes Barre about 10 miles from the city. I have that a small amount of refugees made it to Berwick, and he was one. If there is any disagreements or u find evidence he was not in the area on Doomsday, let me know. Daeseunglim (talk)

Military
Give me a list of what military stuff u don't want, b/c I have no clue what u want and don't want. Daeseunglim (talk)

Categorization and Ms
Hey, LG. Sorry to bother you, but it appears that Ms has failed to listen to your instructions about Categorization in the PM3-sphere yet again (even after your final, final warning).

Here are the incidents: I'm sorry to be bothering you with his stupidity yet again (after 4-5 warnings...), but I think that some sort of action should be taken since he clearly is not learning any sort of lesson from your warnings, so I had to come to you.
 * http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Erie_(Principia_Moderni_III_Map_Game)?action=history
 * http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Treaty_of_Sri_Jayawardenepura_Kotte_(Principia_Moderni_III_Map_Game)?action=history
 * http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Treaty_of_Novgorod_(Principia_Moderni_III_Map_Game)?action=history
 * http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Natchez_(Principia_Moderni_III_Map_Game)?action=history

Futhermore, it may be worthwhile to inform Tr0llis (who listens to Ms on most everything) about the invalidity of adding the PM3 category to every page. Regards, 20:20, August 2, 2014 (UTC) I missed a couple others... 21:03, August 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Netherlands_(Principia_Moderni_III_Map_Game)?action=history
 * http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/ETC/Archive_1_(Principia_Moderni_III_Map_Game)?action=history
 * http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Eastern_Trade_Co._(Principia_Moderni_III_Map_Game)?action=history

Rex, what is your motive to bring this forward to someone who already has Mscoree on "watch"? &#34;SO SAYETH THE EAGLE&#34; - Fascist Eagle ಠ_ಠ (talk)

Hey Lordganon, just wanted to say I'm sorry for those pages. On some of the pages I was trying to test something out with the template, but I'll admit on others I was just being dumb and disobeying. To be honest, I always find it much easier to have every item in one category. It makes it easier to document all pages at once, and to keep track. As such I've always held it policy on my projects to have one large main category. As an administrator in Principia Moderni III this policy became the unofficial rule for some time, which is why all the pages would always after the main category. If this really must be stopped, I will follow, but I beseech you to let this be decided by the users. Besides what harm does it really do? Since those items I have tried to not put the main category, but again it's very inconveniencing. Let me know what you think. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 02:50, August 3, 2014 (UTC)

Again, not trying to bug you but Ms has proceeded to make Template:PM3 a categorization bomb, literally set to add hundreds of page (and all of the work I had to undo...) to Category:Principia Moderni III Map Game when Wikia's internal clock strikes 00:00.

Here is the edit that did it: This is what caused the huge issue that we (you, me, and Sky) talked about on chat the other night that resulted in your "final" warning of him under two weeks ago. Anyhow, I have promptly undone this change, but the effects may/may not be reversible w/o spending tons of time.
 * http://althistory.wikia.com/index.php?title=Template%3APM3&diff=1036154&oldid=1035909

From what I've gathered, any page with the template that is editted since Ms added the category to the Template now is categorized into the wrong, mega-category. 20:01, August 3, 2014 (UTC)

PA Union
I see your reservations on the RoP, I guess if the larger nations of State College and North Penn can't agree, they can hardly be expected to agree with a tiny survivor state. But from reading NP, SC, Gettysburg, and Reading's pages it seems that all have a goal of reunifying in the future. Susquehanna wants that as well, realizing strength in numbers.

Would it be possible for a small military/economic alliance or group to form? Like the Pennsylvanian Alliance? Or something. I just made up the name...doesn't have to be that, actually that name sounds terrible.

Thanks as always for your help.

Daeseunglim (talk)

Hello. It appears that every major contribution I make to this wiki - Mughal Glory, Muslim Rajputana, and Imperium Islamica - are all tagged as ASB. It seems that you simply hate me. That is unlike, but could you please explain why you did this?Great Lord of Nothing ( talk ) 20:44, August 8, 2014 (UTC)

About Alexi... (Green North)
Oh, yeah, about Alexei and his hemophilia, I've decided that I would omit his hemophilia totally, although I think that a Tsarevich Alexi without hemophilia could be ASB... But then again a green Greenland is already ASB, but I don't wanna push my luck so hard yet. What do you think, LG? Should I make Alexi not hemophiliac, or should I abandon his military career storyline altogether?

And sorry for the very long wait. I only got back the nerve to return to actual alternate history...

Godfrey Raphael (talk) 09:12, August 11, 2014 (UTC)

Regarding deleting my Timeline
I noticed you provided a deletion notice on my Timeline A Space Odyssey. I believe I have made the required changes and edits so that the timeline is no longer a derivitive work. I do not know how to change the name of the Pages but if it's atall possible I will. I request that the pages be allowed to remain now that I have complied with the required edits. SpaceGeek1 (talk) 05:06, August 12, 2014 (UTC)SpaceGeek1

Help
I found some socks of M*810. Cheers. 81.210.42.195 05:41, August 14, 2014 (UTC)

I found some vandalnewpages, please delete. 81.210.42.195 06:38, August 14, 2014 (UTC)

Copyeditor
Can you allow me to be copyeditor here, so my edits will be allowed to stay? I have great copyediting potential. My recent edits show that. Constructedlanguage (talk) 10:48, August 15, 2014 (UTC)

I fixed wikilinks according to moves by NFSreloaded. Please keep them, since bad redirects are to be deleted: http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Constructedlanguage Constructedlanguage (talk) 13:27, August 15, 2014 (UTC)

Deleting Stuff
Why are you deleting stuff from my timeline? Would you mind at least stating a reason when you carry out your verdict? That template you deleted for example was one I worked hard on, and now it's lost since I had not saved it anywhere else. Some warning would have been appreciated so I could have at least salvaged the code for my template. Tr0llis (talk) 04:02, August 19, 2014 (UTC)

Since you refuse to explain what you're doing I'm going to have to assume you're vandalizing. All I'm asking for is a simple message or at least edit the summary. Instead you insist on having an edit conflict, which is against the rules, all because you are inadequately or unable to effectively explain/converse with people. Just tell me your though process here. Chances are I'd agree with you, but instead you are doing this the brute force way. Please just stop editing my timeline until you explain why you are deleting content from it. Thanks, Tr0llis (talk) 15:44, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

But they were fine with such accusations (because they're true) and we've since moved past them to the point where we have a sort of friendly rivalry. To fill you in on what happened, Rex had made a timeline in a completely different century and with a different POD, then I came on and said "Hey I happen to be making a timeline too, here's my idea". Basically I then described my timeline, and several hours later I find out they completely copying it from the chat window to their timeline, completely changing their timeline to be identical to mine. They even said they got the idea from me on their POD page, and Rex for one seems to have little remorse. Rather than eternally edit conflict (like you are) or argue with him all day, I decided to let him steal the idea so that we could make a sort of friendly rivalry. I made that template to get the record straight, and regardless I would have at least appreciated you saving the code before you deleted it, since I spent a long time on it. Oddly enough though I was trying to reword it to sound less like a "passive insult" (which I don't believe is a thing unless you mean passive aggressive) before you edit conflicted me. (Also should I take a hint from your message and just go full aggressive? Perhaps with a little of this.) "Could care less if they "stole" or "copied" an idea from you. But that doesn't give you the right to accuse them of it," yes it kind of does. They wronged someone and I wrote it. Never have I heard you don't have "right" as an excuse not to document a crime or wrongdoing in the real world. But considering there is no punishment for stealing work, and that you wouldn't have the "right to accuse" if I broke the rules anyway, maybe I should go ahead and copy and paste 1983: Doomsday and make an identical timeline called 1983: Apocalypse haha. Sorry to be kind of ranting at the end there, but I'm sort of annoyed about this. Honestly if you had just asked me to remove it or had said why you were removing it I would have kindly done it. I also came to agree that it was kind of harsh, as did Bfox, but as I was trying to reword it you edit conflicted me. I feel this is a really ineffective way to do things on a wiki. By the fact your edit has been undone a half dozen times and the fact we're having this conversation, shows how bad this method is working, although to you it may seem like brute forcing your way through people is the best way to do this. I ask that you stop deleting things from my timeline without warning or reason. Hell, for all I know tomorrow you'll delete the entire timeline saying it's a passive insult against English people, or whatever else it is that Rex says. Recently this event has really opened my eyes on how the staff is unable or unwilling to prevent thief or work cooperatively. Also didn't realize that passive insults were bad, I mean you basically called Ms mentally retarded in front of the whole TSPTF (-_-). If you think it's okay to call a sick youth all those things you called him, but it's not okay to say "this timeline looks similar to this other one", then I guess I need to reevaluate what counts as an insult on this wiki. Rest assured though I will do so and prevent this from ever happening again. Thanks, Tr0llis (talk) 14:30, August 21, 2014 (UTC)

What do you mean "that is what you got out of that"? I pretty much addressed every single part of your message, including the "could care less". Also you edited the original message to say "you think". Are you implying that I they didn't? Again here's the breakdown. The fact that they stole it isn't debatable, it's universally accepted. The fact that we both let it go and are cool with it is another thing, so again I don't see why you are deleting things from my timeline.
 * I begin months of research on this time period, and I even sent CrimsonAssassin a message with the research several months ago.
 * Rex makes a timeline about a completely different century and POD with Liker.
 * I'm like "Oh nice, I was also thinking of making a timeline. Here's my POD."
 * Rex changes his timeline to be in a different century completely and with my POD that I just told him.
 * I ask them politely to remove it several times. I get called a "troll" and a bunch of other names, and Liker says he has reported me to the FBI (seems legit).
 * Rex makes a POD page in which he admits he got the idea from me.
 * I write on the POD page that I really wasn't okay with them using the idea.
 * They remove that from the POD page.
 * Liker eventually apologizes to me and says he's quitting that timeline.
 * I figure that if my idea is going to be copied I might as well try my hardest and make it anyway to sort of rival the copy.
 * Rex starts PMing me trying to get me to join his timeline and/or be silent.
 * I decline his offer to join his timeline and focus on my own.
 * He agrees to a sort of friendly rivalry, and we create rules for this competition of sorts between us.

When he stole my idea there were multiple TSPTF and others in the chat who all witnessed this. I talked to both Yank and Bfox, TSPTF members, who all said there wasn't much that I could do, and recommended I just continue work on my own timeline to try and best the copy. Bfox also ended up trying to talk down Rex, and later joined work alongside me. So in conclusion there is no question it's a copy, it's just that we're all way ahead of that, and that I feel less obliged to remove something which maybe is "passive" (which by the way, definition wise means no operational, obedient, without argument or resisting, or not actively taking part...), coming from someone who actively insults people with comments on their mental stability and then brute forces through people's work without explanation. That's just my thoughts on the matter anyway. Thanks for the response, Tr0llis (talk) 16:47, August 21, 2014 (UTC)

Can you please stop deleting stuff? Look, no one sees it as insulting at all, and you appear to be the only one offended by it. Meanwhile you are being actually passive aggressive (which by the way is a thing, unlike "passive insults", the term you made up), by calling the reply section "Stuff" in quotation marks, with is both mocking and belittling. Unlike you though I don't go around deleting these things from random pages. Actually if I went around deleting all the offensive things you say, all the comments on mental stability, all the name calling, I would end up banned. I don't think we should hold you at a different standard, and I ask that if you are really that sad/offended to take it to the TSPTF page instead of just strong arming the whole situation. Thanks, Tr0llis (talk) 16:15, August 25, 2014 (UTC)

That latest version wasn't even offensive. Why do you have to keep undoing it when the people involved are fine with it and this is how we decided to do it. You're just edit warring now, and for no good reason...Tr0llis (talk) 22:15, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

CoS military
Hey LG, I was looking around online at military units, and found that there is a base named the Tobyhanna Army Depot in Tobyhanna. It was strategically placed to avoid being destroyed by nuclear strikes on New York, Scranton, and Wilkes Barre. Any possibility of units making it to Susquehanna?

Artillery Battery B of the 1st Battalion 109th Company was stationed in Nanicoke, Company A of the Headquarters Battalion of the 55th Heavy Brigade Combat Team was stationed in Berwick. I realize that much of the 109th was destroyed in the strike on Wilkes Barre, but portions (with no artillery) could have survived.

Daeseunglim (talk)

Edit Reversion
Why have you been reverting my edits? I have read the rules of this wiki thoroughly, and it seems that I am following al of them. So what is the problem?

Flenuan (talk) 23:58, August 22, 2014 (UTC)

A note on blocking
Hey Lordganon. Someone's recently reported a recurring troll to your wiki that I've investigated. I thought it'd be a good idea to check in with you as you were the one who's been doing most of the blocking.

Firstly, I've put a short block on Special:Contributions/Lingwistyka, who wasn't really vandalising, but was being troublesome in edit summaries and looked like they were a sockpuppet of a banned user. I then had a look at their history and found quite a few sockpuppets on the same IP address. I also noticed that you blocked that IP address without the option "Prevent logged-in users from editing from this IP address". I've changed this block to include this option.

Due to the way Wikia is set up, a block with "Prevent logged-in users from editing from this IP address" doesn't do what you think it does. In this case, it actually prevents automatic blocks of a sockpuppet account - as if the sockpuppet account is using the same IP address, it won't be unblocked - and the system can't tell when you block a sockpuppet that you want to overwrite a block. What this means is that someone who is blocked with this option can create an account on any wiki on Wikia and continue editing on your wiki.

The way to prevent this happening in the future is simple, you need to make sure that "Prevent logged-in users from editing from this IP address" is checked, otherwise the block is, honestly - worse than useless. Sorry for the lengthy explanation of this - it's not something that's explained very well around Wikia.

Let me know if you need any more help --  Ransom Time  12:50, August 23, 2014 (UTC)

Latgalia's Russians
Why is it so implausible that Latgalia has a considerable Russian minority? In 1979 there were 821,464 Russians living in Latvia, which amounts to about 32%. Even today the percentage hasn't fallen bellow 26%. And a large amount of those Russians lived, and still live in the Latgale region. While there would be considerable loss from the nuking of Daugavpils and emigration the Russian population is still nothing to sneeze at. How big should the Russian population be? Because it certainly isn't zero. Even discounting refugees after DD the population already there pre-DD would still be sizable. --Yank 03:29, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

My new Althistory novel
Dude, I am making an althistory novel, but need some help. How could a Polish-Ukrainian Empire take over all of Russia west of the Urals? Spartian300 (talk) 15:20, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

PM3 Timeline
I think there was a misunderstanding about what "Principia Moderni III Community Timeline". They made that page as an alternate history timeline about the map game, as in, what if this event in the game hadn't happened. It is in no way a timeline for PM3, and is not affiliated with the map game at all. PM3 already has a timeline of events in the map game, and you can find it here. The page you renamed isn't a timeline for PM3 at all, just like how Principia Nevermind isn't a timeline for Principia Moderni. Would you mind renaming it? It's not a part of the map game, but a timeline.

Cleaning Images
Okay sorry about that, I noticed that on Wikipedia it is done a lot, but I will stop doing it. Mscoree (talk) 15:52, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Back to Ancient Rome
i have been reading up on a few events in the classic era just out of curiousity and the Octavian-anthony war caught my interest. Could The Anthony-Egyptian alliance have come out victorious against Octavian in the battle of Actium or any time prior and what would the long term effects of such a victory have been.

i doubt the cleopatra-antony regime could have lasted or that it would have even been able to expand beyond the historical egyptian empire, but im interested in what the aftermath would be and how it would effect the stability of the Roman republic and on the near east.

With Blood and Iron (talk) 19:17, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

You Doing Alright?
It's been a while since you've been active. I just wanted to be sure that you were doing alright. -- 16:21, October 4, 2014 (UTC)


 * I can understand. Just hoping you're doing alright. -- 21:23, October 6, 2014 (UTC)

Hey, LG!
I am just wondering a couple things, some personal, some not.

First off, is everything all right? 'Cause you don't seem to be on much these days. You don't need to respond, but do know that if there's a way, you could vent. I do seem to be everybody's personal therapist anyway, lol.

Second thing, given how indecisive I've been with my TLs, I think I've found a possible compromise. I could have A Violent Peace as my timeline, but also, when the time comes, have a bunch of mini-timelines attached to it through an "AlternateHistory Wiki" page. Though, they'd probably become timelines in their own right, let's be honest.

Thirdly, I had a couple questions I asked you from a while back, both personal and impersonal, and I can't find them. I don't know if they got deleted or if it's just 2:00 in the morning.

Fourth, I'd like someone to respond to my questions posted on my TL's talkpage. Not necessarily you, particularily if you cannot, but if you could please point me in the direction of someone I could ask, that would be great.

I'm really bad a signing things off, and goodbyes and stuff, so I'll just wrap things up with a sig.

Canuck2012 (talk) 05:02, October 6, 2014 (UTC)Canuck2012

Just out of curiosity, if CYOAH is fine, why isn't ARAG?

01:35, October 14, 2014 (UTC)

A few more inquiries about the 1700s
ive started my timeline on frederick the great marrying amelia of great britain and i had a few inquiries.

first off what effects would the anglo-prussian alliance have on the polish war of succession, and what would the effects have on seperatism in the new world, or rather what would the effects be on french support for american independence if there even is any american seperatist sentiments.

finally would the child of Frederick,Prince of Wales, and princess wilhemine of prussia have been saner or more out of it then george iii of britain.

With Blood and Iron (talk) 20:57, October 16, 2014 (UTC)

sorry but could you please respond to my inquiries im stuck and would like to move forward with the timeline. With Blood and Iron (talk) 15:11, October 30, 2014 (UTC)

Trojan war
Just FYI my trojan war was not fully fleshed out and i needed to discuss things with crim. I was meaning to get to you about how the trojans could win, would it simply just be not brining the horse into the city at all? seems a little anti-climactic

Changes to PMIII
All the changes I make to PMIII keep getting "unchanged."

What gives?

Bil

EoGuy (talk) 04:29, October 21, 2014 (UTC)

I'm probably leaving
I don't `like the Visual Editor so I'm probably leaving.

Bye bye

Bil

EoGuy (talk) 22:10, October 22, 2014 (UTC)

1983 Doomsday article adoption
Hi Lordganon, i want to adopt the "1983 doomsday" article "New Britain", unfortunately the current owner, Imperium Guy, is on a tempory haitus.

So long story short I'm asking for your permission to adopt the artical.

I hope to hear from you in the near-future -Dreamcaster1 (talk) 17:11, October 28, 2014 (UTC)

"Things"
Hey, LG, it's been quite some time.

I have two things I need to ask you. 22:12, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Relating to 1983: DD, Feddy and I (since Impo has basically gone AWOL) are looking for a way to make the Congo Crises plausible. Our current plan is suchly:
 * 2) In the South, tensions have been rising rapidly over the last few years. They were temporarily quelled in 2007 by the unification of Kinshasa and Brazzaville, but that's no longer enough to abate the violence- something WILL happen there, sooner or later. Kongo is the first to act, ramping up tensions with the PRA- since they're the easiest target- and sending in the troops, deliberately causing border crises. They're much stronger, militarily- they're trying to provoke a fight. The PRA is extremely reluctant, but after the raids and suchlike, public outcry reaches monumental levels, and they declare war, calling on their allies- Cabinda and the Soviets- to help them. Problem is, Cabinda has grown closer to Zaire over the last few years, and Zaire don't really like either side. Meanwhile, the SKA is weak, and are actively under threat from a resurgent Botswana. Still, they send what aid they can, and give a token declaration of war. Upshot is, the PRA begins to lose- badly. For reference, the war started in August 2013, and the PRA begins to collapse by Jan 2014. At this point, however, the Zaire and Cabinda get involved. They may not LIKE the PRA, but the one thing they hate more is the idea of a Kongo that's powerful enough to take them on. So they intervene, and now the tables turn. The three-front offensive begins to brutally hurt the Kongolese, and the Coalition appears to be winning. By Sept of 2014, the war appears almost over. But now, the RoA, which hates the PRA with a vengeance, decide that they aren't going to stand for a PRA led alliance taking over Angola, and they attack the Coalition. Meanwhile, in an action somewhat related to the war, Botswana takes advantage of the Angolese situation and swoops in to take over the SKA, a prize they have coveted for years. That's all we've got so far- take us to about March of next year. We think Zambia might get involved too, since they aren't too hot on the idea of an expansionist Botswana on their borders. According to Imp, at least, Botswana's actions makes sense. The RoA hating the PRA is well documented- technically, they're still at war. The Kongolese have been looking to expand for years, which has in the past resulted in war with all the nations around them- except the RoA. Zaire literally formed to fight Kongo, and the area- unlike the North- is pretty clear, so there's no problem with communication. Furthermore, trade and war between the nations are well documented.
 * 3) That's quite a wall of text, lol, but we would like your approval.
 * 4) On the second note- can I have my TSPTF position? My nom expired 3 days ago.

p5
Can I ask why three of centralized empire's nations are disconnected from the category p5? Thank you.

Imperator Augustus (talk) 10:05, November 2, 2014 (UTC)

RE: Naming Rules
What about Timeline 1918? And anyway, I have already named all the articles and categories and templates after it. --Vladimir of Kiev (talk) 03:12, November 4, 2014 (UTC)

timelines
LG i've come here asking you for something, could you please review the pods of the timelines I'm going to list you here, I've tried to alter the timelines in order to unlabel the timelines and to continue working on them eventually. well the timelines are next Sine dei gloriem &#34;Ex Initio Terrae&#34; (talk) 01:21, November 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Bronze and Civilizations Age
 * 2) Comunero Success

1983: Doomsday Graduation
I was under the assumption that if an 83DD page had all of its criticisms addressed and no other ones were levied at it for the next two weeks it could be graduated. Sorry, I'll try to better familiarize myself with the rules before I pull a stupid mistake like I did. —Bfoxius (talk)

Use of a sock puppet in chat?
Okay, there is something I would like to request. It's bold, I know, but may I use an old sock puppet of mine? I was tivked at this other wiki, and tried to get revenge. So I made my Sockpuppet, Mur-dorr., to do so. I want to get on chat so as see if I can get Scar's van lifted. Spartian300 (talk) 01:02, November 22, 2014 (UTC)

China
Hey, LG, long time no see!

Listen, I've been thinking about China in 1983:DD, and I wanted to run a few ideas by you.

As you know, Gansu was annexed by the PRC in what Impo and I are going to call "The Winter Coup". Basically, the Communists rig some elections and attempt to hand power over the PRC- the democratic government refuses to step down, there are protests against the Communists- and then the PRC steps in with some good old-fashioned police action, taking complete control.

Now, I AM slightly bitter about this, because I wasn't consulted before Gansu was offed, but a fait accompli is a fait accompli, and I recognize that Gansu is gone forever. I'm saying this to make it clear that while I may have a little bias, my claims ARE grounded in fact.

That said, I have a few questions... Thanks,  02:16, November 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Given that the Communist Party of Gansu didn't come into being until around 2012, and that it wasn't very popular throughout Gansu's history, what's a reasonable percentage of the population that would support them? I guessed around 15%, whereas Imp seems to think it's closer to 35%.
 * 2) Would it be plausible for numerous militias to erupt out of the demise of Gansu? Somewhat like the Syrian Civil War, except much more stacked against the rebels? Enough, basically, to maintain a running insurgency in the countryside of Gansu?
 * 3) If the answer to 2 is yes, then how strong would this insurgency be? I was thinking something along the lines of "The PRC controls the cities, the rebels control the countryside", but that might be a little over ambitious...
 * 4) Is it likely that riots might spread from Gansu to the PRC itself? Some sort of Tiananmen Square sort of thing- except the tanks are busy dealing with the Gansuan rebels?
 * 5) Is it possible that the state might, in the next few years, collapse? After all, the army is now trying to fight a civil war in half the nation, with something like a third of the population dedicatedly opposed to them...

1983: Impfondo
I wasn't sure if you saw my message on the talk page in regards to my page, so I thought I'd message you here to make sure. I was just wondering if you've gotten a chance to read through it yet. I don't mean to rush you, but I'm curious to know what you think, and I'm not really clear if the page graduates or not (according to some users your objection isn't valid, but I don't mean to cause trouble or risk consequences by ignoring this). Please get back to me soon. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 14:36, November 29, 2014 (UTC)

I objected too, Ms, and I told you what needed to be done to get over said objections- you haven't done it.

15:31, November 29, 2014 (UTC)

Victory of the Gray
Greetings LG, I hope life has been treating you well.

I was looking over my Victory of the Gray scenario, and noticed you had removed the categories I had placed it in and added ASB-biased. Would you please explain the reasoning behind that? Nothing I proposed in it had anything to do with fantastical elements, but was instead based upon actual events and plans for example. The initial POD even deals with an OTL correspondence between the Confederate Naval Secretary and General Polk.

God Bless the United States of America (talk) 04:57, December 3, 2014 (UTC)

Stirlings 15
Hello LG, I am writing to inform you that I have taken the initiative and started the page for the 2015 Stirling Awards. I have not changed anything and hope that I haven't caused insult to you by doing what you normally do.

01:17, December 4, 2014 (UTC)

Lesotho
Ms himself said that it wasn't an actual objection, and that he was just trying to make a point.

In any case, if "I'm too lazy to read" is a real objection, that TL's gone to hell.

23:07, December 5, 2014 (UTC)

Please note that I said no such thing. It appears Guns is merely trying to get his page gradded, and at this point it's irrelevant, since people have made actual objections to the content. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 23:16, December 5, 2014 (UTC)

I apologize for not having a screenshot of that particular message. The next time he says anything I will refer to later, I will rectify that issue.

In the meantime, could you graduate The Griffin's Doom, which has no objections to it?

00:28, December 9, 2014 (UTC)