User talk:Tbguy1992

French Industrial Revolution
Your "French Industrial Revolution" timeline has been nominated for deletion because it hardly contains any actual content, if you are still interested in writing this AltHist you are given four weeks time to let us know and to start writing on, otherwise it will be deleted.--Max Sinister 10:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

L'empire de Napoleanic se lèvera!‎
The title in proper french should be "L'empire napoléonien se lèvera!"--Marcpasquin 14:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Napoleon's World
I myself am perpetually working on my own Napoleonic AltHist Napoleon's World - however, his victory occurs in 1813, not 1805 as in yours. The early 1800's is the section I struggle the most with due to believability and such. Let me know what you think? I'd appreciate it enormously. Regards, KingSweden 00:42, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Of course, always a pleasure. Let me know what I can do to improve my own TL. KingSweden 22:54, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Linking articles
You don't need to use the url to link articles in a wiki. Just add brackets around the article as so: The French Empire (French Trafalgar, British Waterloo). Thus it creates this: The French Empire (French Trafalgar, British Waterloo). If you don't want the title to show or you want the text of the link to be different from the destination, use a "|", for example: The French Empire. That would get you this: The French Empire. Mitro 20:08, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Images
You can't get an image to appear simply by linking to wikipedia. You have to save the image onto your computer, upload it onto this wiki and then use the file name on whatever article you want it to appear on. Mitro 20:20, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Culloden
I would love to write an alt his on what would have happened if the Jacobites had won Culloden. I know you are into the Napoleonic wars, and that would be the right time period, but I am having a lot of trouble finding out information about this time in history, specifically what would have changed. Please help. thanks.

Anna Geddes

Chinese modernaisation
I was reading about China in your French Trafalgar, British Waterloo timeline. I think you fail to realise that just because of a few wars, the Manchus would be unlikely to change their armies. They refused utterly to believe the Western barbarians were technologically more advanced than they were. In OTL, it took an army in Peking to convince them and even then they believed the upstart Europeans would be crushed by their obviously better armaments. It took the destruction of the Summer Palace to hammer home the point. I therefore find is somewhat disbelievable that they would look at the barbarians wars and think they would signify. Bob 20:32, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

The denouement should not be a simple war. In the Manchus eyes just because the drill, disciplihne and armament of the Europeans is better, means nothing. In their eyes, they are barbarians and they will certainly fail. They think like this, just because a bigger boy can stamp down your sandcastle, it doesn't make him more civilised than you. I think the truth should be brought home in a more subtle way. For example, assuming the British get Hong Kong (or whoever, French Portuguese, Swiss just so long as they are Westerners and presumably imperialists) they would go to Peking to sign a treaty. The mere fact a barbarian Westerner entered the Forbidden City would shake them. And because he wouldn't kow-tow before the Celestial Prince, but look him in the eye as a man and as a man who has lost would be the killing blow for Manchu arrogance. Bob 17:12, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Possible collaboration
I was hoping that maybe I could possibly help you with some of the aticles in your timeline. It has the makings of a real whopper. Bob 18:48, May 5, 2010 (UTC) The population of the British Empire would at this point be overwhelmingly Indian. India alone compried about a third of the Empire's population. Whats to stop the colonial government from using this enormous population as a colonial tool. It was working in Sarawak where Chinese(themselves with a decent population) were encouraged to settle. Why not put that population to good use and use it to settle the sparsely populated and therefore weak British American territories. Or to beat the French in the Scramble for Africa. In OTL we encouraged British nobles to go to Africa. In this world why not a few Indian princes. Not only that but by reducing the population of India you would reduce nationalism, therefore tightening British power. Its like a vaster and more elaborate version of Sierra Leone. Bob 16:37, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

With the advent of this ethnic mixing a trend would appear which I have detailed on the UK page. The typical Britisher as seen around the world would increasingly be an English-speaking man who wears British style clothes and works hard for Queen and country but his ethnicity is closer to the Punjab than Perth! The Empire would be reforged over a matter of years as the white British identity and the Indian colonist identity are fused together. Bob 10:44, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

Allies, Axis and Communism
Would you accept a version of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and the German-Soviet Commercial Pact? I hope you will accept. Fegaxeyl 14:48, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

As you may know Vegas Addict and I have been debating as to whether Brazil would invade Argentina, and which side the USSR would support. I'll just lay out the basic situation:

Supporting Brazil: Supporting Argentina: It's your choice as to which way you go, but remember there will be CONSEQUENCES... Fegaxeyl 17:52, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Gain powerful South American ally
 * Ally has mostly identical political leanings
 * Loss of any benefits gained in the alliance with Germany, Japan, Italy and other Axis states
 * Earn trust of Germany and other Axis states
 * Solidify position as an active and powerful member of the Axis
 * Lose some face in the global communist community (but as in OTL the USSR had dropped its World Revolution rhetoric this may not be as important)

Write Next
Please write the next section for The New & Improved map game (Map Game). --Catherine 22:41, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

I would love to see more on your timeline Titanic, the Luckiest Ship in the World. --Catherine 19:47, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

You could write that the Titanic remains in service for 40 years, from 1912-1952. Have it it survived World Wars I and II and that instead of being scrapped when it was retired, that it was instead restored to it's 1912 incranation and made a floating museum of maritime history. --Catherine 20:00, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

That would not sound fair. I want Titanic to still be pretty famous. --Catherine 20:12, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Britanic would have been called Gigantic in this timeline as it was only renamed after the sinking of the TitanicVegas adict 20:15, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Oh.

Will you please also read Russian Empire (Constantine's Russia) and give me advice on how I can improve it. Also, please continue work on the Titanic timeline. I die for more.--Catherine 20:17, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

French Trafalgar, British Waterloo
I took a look at the additions you've made, it looks great! I was wondering if you could sneak a peak at a few of my pages (specifically the ones concerning Alaska and let me know what you think - there's only a few, but I've been giving them a lot of work. KingSweden 23:33, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

That would be alright I guess, as long as everything fits into the TL I envisioned. If things deviate too much I'll probably give them an edit or two, so don't take personal offense if I do. KingSweden 17:19, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

You know, I took a look at your TL and love the way you're setting up the pending World War in North America and Europe - I don't know what I could do to add to it at the moment. But feel free to make your contributions to Napoleon's World like we discussed! Once there's more on yours so I can get a sense of your direction, I'll make a few articles for you. KingSweden 23:41, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

When will you?
When will you expand Timeline (Titanic, the Luckiest Ship in the World)? I am begging for a lot more, and have been waiting for days for the adventure to continue. --Catherine 15:15, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah! When will you get back to work? --Catherine 15:19, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Good work. I look foward to more. I would love to see Titanic and Olympic surviving World War II as well, also acting as transport ships, and them being de-commissioned in 1952, renovated to their 1912 look, and made maritime museums on water. --Catherine 16:22, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, make the Titanic the museum ship, and sell the Olympic to a rich businessman. --Catherine 18:14, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

I die for more on Titanic. --Catherine 18:49, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Roger that. I will not message for Titanic anymore. --Catherine 18:56, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Yesterday, you said today you would work on Titanic. --Catherine 16:47, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Whoa! You had no right to be rude like that. I will leave you alone, but don't yell at me again. You made me fuckin angry! --Catherine 16:58, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Apology accepted. Continue with whatever you want to do. --Catherine 17:20, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Why are you taking so long to work on the Titanic timeline? I am impatient and irritated. --Catherine 17:17, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Oh okay. I have another question: can you tell me a link to a good alternate history timeline of the British Empire? --Catherine 17:41, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Help me!!! (AAC)
I wasn't counting on Japan making Chile a puppet, as i was asuming that they couldn't get past the carriers (Which it seems everyone has ignored) and would apreciate the USSR's suport in thisVegas adict 21:16, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Uraguy might fall into the USSR's sphere of ifluence as it had been ocupied by the Nazi'sVegas adict 09:09, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Great Britain in FTBW
I noticed on the last paragraph that Great Britain has one of the largest armies in Europe. Now even up to the First World War in OTL, the UK tended to have a small army and a menacingly vast Navy. Whats changed? Also about the American Civil War thing. I was thinking that the British would support the CSA because they would want to weaken the USA in any way they can. Bob 09:01, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Great Britain in FTBW
I noticed on the last paragraph that Great Britain has one of the largest armies in Europe. Now even up to the First World War in OTL, the UK tended to have a small army and a menacingly vast Navy. Whats changed? Also about the American Civil War thing. I was thinking that the British would support the CSA because they would want to weaken the USA in any way they can. Bob 09:01, June 16, 2010 (UTC)