Alternative History:Request for user rights

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF (user rights). Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only be one administrator for every 1000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time a new one is needed or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

IMPORTANT: only registered users with 200 or more edits and at least two months on this wiki will be allowed to vote in the user nominations or to nominate candidates.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor so long as they accept the nomination first.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.
 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail or been blocked in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Feudalplague
Feud has been a member of the wiki since 2013, he won a sterling for best new contributor and he has grown as a person since then. He has recently shown his level-headedness in chat and his dedication towards  the community via 95T so I believe he is ready to become a constable of the TSPTF SkyGreen24 15:20, March 2, 2016 (UTC)

19:16, March 7, 2016 (UTC)'' 03:56, March 8, 2016 (UTC)''
 * Supporters
 * Awesome history 28 (talk) 17:21, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * I thought he was a mod already lol
 * Flag of Tasmania.svg HawkAussie (Talk) Flag of Australia.svg 01:17, March 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * ~There was a candy,  and it said,  "Yo' shit, I'm coming for you, bruh. Oi bitch, g'day, you wanna mate?" ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
 * ''Prinsenvlag.svg Hail Sean! (Get a free potato here)
 * ''Roman-spqr-flag.png Consul Ioshua  (Talk) SPQR_EMBLEM.jpg
 *  Jbwncster  (Talk)  RustySilverGear.png 16:41, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
 * Person67
 * Objectors
 * I love feud but I don't think he has been active enough recently [[Image:Flag of Russian Alaska (HR).svg |40px|link=User talk:Octivian Marius]] OCT MARIUS, Hail Marius  [[Image: Flag of Italy (Federalist Italy).svg|40px|User talk:Octavian Marius]]
 * لا إله إلا الله † وعيسى ابن الله  01:49, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
 * 01:34, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
 * Like him as a guy, like him as a contributor, but I have the same reservations as Rex & Edge. FP ( Now 10% edgier!!!  ) 16:54, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Xanian Empire.svg Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 01:31, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * Discussion
 * I accept this nomination. Would definitely like to see my advancement in the community and took alot of time off to work on myself and fix alot of my previous attitude issue. As it stands i would really like to get back into the wiki and advance within the administrative system and really be help to the site in general.
 * I'm choosing to abstain. Let me justify this before you tell me I'm backstabing a friend or anything. I think his current status a a mod in 95T has shown his dedication, but has also made him a polorizing user, even among the TSTPF ranks. I have no doubts about Feud's ablity, but his status as a chadmin would excacrbate certin issues that must be adressed first and foremost. #PraiseRoosevelt. 03:47, March 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * I will probably also object, mildly. Again, Feud is a great guy and a real workhorse, but I have a few reservations. The first would be that he is unproven as a Chat Admin, where he is regulary heartily invovled in debates. Without attacking any other current TSPTF'ers in particular, we have recently seen how oft-debating users with Chat Admin powers can backfire. Secondly, I get the impression Feud doesn't see himself as active. This is proven when he states "[a]s it stands I would really like to get back into the wiki." Now, Feud has been away from the wiki for a little bit, but his recent return has largely been limited to 95T, and not general administrative functions, let alone timelineering. Some great users are better in the user base than in the TSPTF base. 01:34, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
 * Feud has issues with authority. While I do not doubt his committment to responsibility, one too many occassions has he abused his power, times I have predicted and pointed out time and time again. Perhaps another time, but not now. And Rex has a point. Feud normally isn't active on the wiki, and when he is, he tends to leave rather quickly. Feud himself has stated that he is always busy, so at what point would Feud be able to execute his duties as a constable? There are other users out there are more active and willing to regulate themselves with regards to the powers they have been given. Flag of the Xanian Empire.svg Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 01:31, March 11, 2016 (UTC)

United Republic
Here is a user I believe to be criminally underrated. He is someone who cares about the future of the wiki, and has written some kickass timelines to show for it. Definitely think he is ready for the next step. #PraiseRoosevelt. 01:30, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
 * Supporters
 * لا إله إلا الله † وعيسى ابن الله  01:49, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
 * #FreeTheUR
 * Long Live the Republic!
 * Nlenhardt (talk) 00:24, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * .....  Because I'm Just... Too... SSSWWWEEEEEETTT!!!
 * Flag of the Xanian Empire.svg Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 01:35, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * Vatonica (talk) 02:00, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * —Bfoxius (talk)
 * Objectors
 *  Jbwncster  (Talk)  RustySilverGear.png 16:41, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
 * 16:58, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
 * ~There was a candy,  and it said,  "Yo' shit, I'm coming for you, bruh. Oi bitch, g'day, you wanna mate?" ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)  We all know what you're going to do with me once you get mod status. :')
 * Scarlet Outlaw
 * Scarlet Outlaw


 * Discussion
 * I graciously accept the nomination bestowed upon me. I want to become more involved in this wiki, and I know being a TSPTF mod will certainly help me achieve that. While, in the past, my behavior was unsatisfactory, I know that I will be a better user now than I was then.
 * I personally tend to like UR, but I just don't see him as the type of unifying user who we ought to have on the TSPTF. After conversing with other users on chat, it has become apparent that, while UR has the potential to do great things in the future, this nomination has come a bit prematurely. 16:58, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
 * I must respectfully disagree with Rex on this one. UR has proven to me on a number of occassions that he is both responsible and amicable toward other users. I would be proud to give him my seal of approval, and I would encourage others to recognize that UR has what it takes to be a reponsible representative of this wiki as a constable. Flag of the Xanian Empire.svg Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 01:35, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * I fully and absolutely support UR's progressive and reformer ideals. Vatonica (talk) 02:00, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * I feel that UR can be immature at times and does not know how to stop when someone tells him to stop. He is a good on his TL, but in the chats he is a different person. In the futere if he could mature he would be a fine for the position. - Scarlet Outlaw

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor so long as they accept the nomination.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also have not had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Rules

 * Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (Please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he or she wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.
 * They are a Lieutenant.
 * They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for nomination to be accepted.
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Impeachment
It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

 * User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
 * If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment, with support of at least one TSTPF member.
 * Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
 * Registered users' votes must have two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons
There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:
 * They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
 * They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
 * They have have not been fair, restrained, and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
 * They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

Note: One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.

Current Impeachments
===Name of TSPTF member===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.

Vivaporius

 * Supporters


 * person67 (not sure how to link my name)
 * ~There was a candy,  and it said,  "Bruh, I'm coming for you, bruh. Oi, g'day mate you wanna mate?" ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)


 * Objectors


 * [[Image:Flag of Russian Alaska (HR).svg |40px|link=User talk:Octivian Marius]] OCT MARIUS, Hail Marius  [[Image: Flag of Italy (Federalist Italy).svg|40px|User talk:Octavian Marius]]
 * Discussion
 * Please provide a legitimate set of reasons and complaints as to why you wish for this impeachment. Otherwise this means nothing. ~ Scraw 18:45, February 28, 2016 (UTC)
 * He has disrespected almost every user on chat(besides people who agree with him), he won't change the topic when asked. He's very biased. I have yet to see him edit a page for admin responsibilities in the last month I've been here. -- Jbwncster   (Talk)  RustySilverGear.png 18:41, February 28, 2016 (UTC)
 * This vote is invalid as it has no TSPTF support, try again after discussing this on the TSPTF talk page SkyGreen24 15:07, February 29, 2016 (UTC)
 * This vote is invalid as it has no TSPTF support, try again after discussing this on the TSPTF talk page SkyGreen24 15:07, February 29, 2016 (UTC)