User talk:Alexanders

<==Bit Files==

For starters, either use a blog post, or post on our forums, next time.

As for the question, the only even guess I have is some sort of quality control.

Lordganon 18:09, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

That is something to ask on the talk page for that game. Lordganon 18:14, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

World War III(Map Game)
Welcome aboard! Right now,the War is raging,so be prepared! And if you need any help let me know. As France, I hereby unofficial offer you a alliance if you help NATO oppose the Soviet Union and do not try to spread Communism.We will assist you in building your military and economy for this war also.Let us know if you acceptGod Bless the United States of America 04:46, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

I accept, but I dont know how a map game works, Thanks! Alexanders 17:19, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Its fairly easy,but pita could probably explain it better God Bless the United States of America 04:13, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Its basically like a mini TL everytime,you just respond to the sititautionGod Bless the United States of America 20:22, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

A Different History
Hey Alex, would you like to help me on my ATL A Different History? It is an ATL where there are mutliple Points of Divergences, and I would really appreciate your help. PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 23:15, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Ok I'll see what I can do, I would like you to read The Empire of the White Falcon and leave comments and suggestions, Alexanders 23:24, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Ok, thanks, Alex! Also, it's considered "good manners" to respond back to people on their own talk page. Thanks! PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 23:27, March 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, Alex. I don't know where the "rules" are, but I have been on here a while (since November 2009) and I would rather see questions answered where they are asked.  To me it is quite confusing if I am following a discussion to have to go back and forth.  But to me, private talk pages should be more "private" anyway.  Discussions of pages are best done AT the pages themselves.  If you mark the page "Follow this page" you will get an email when some one makes a remark.  98.71.130.30 20:36, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Actually, you see Alex, what I want to do is make a detailed ATL that is both fun to read and write. Obviously, fully making the timeline itself into 2011 will take at least a year, but I am prepared to work on it for that long. Also, I am hoping that more people, such as Crimsonassassin, Michael Douglas, and Roguejedi, all close "friends" on this wiki will help. However, both Mike and Rogue have been inactive for some time, so I'm not sure if they'll come back.

Hey Alexanders. I just got your message on my talk page, and to your 1st question, YES. I will finish my timeline Third Rome In Britannia; I've just been so busy with school, that I've had little time to work on it. I also am grateful that you find my timeline fascinating. To your second question about giving you tips, just try to make your own ALT. history as though it were a page on wikipedia. That's how I've always based my article. So, good luck with your own timeline, and know that I will start working on my own once again while I have a brake in my workload. Intellectual Crusader 15:12, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Socialist States of America
Please read this: Alternative History:Adoption Policy. Mitro 03:35, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Um...ok. If you read the article, than you would realize that was the wrong question to ask. Seriously, where the hell does it say I have to put it up for adoption? It is not even my article! Follow our rules or don't bother editing this wiki. Mitro 18:38, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * You obviously did not read the whole thing. Read Alternative History:Adoption Policy.  Mitro 00:50, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Uploading Images
When you uploaded your "vikings" image you overwrote an image already on the wiki, for someone else's timeline. I have reverted the image, and removed it from your article. Feel free to upload your image again as something else. Don't do it again. Lordganon 23:40, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Why does it have to be removed from his article? if its already there,,couldn't you just take it off the wiki but leave it on his page and it was accident,why does he need to be threatened?God Bless the United States of America 20:24, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

GB, this is none of your concern. Lordganon 20:30, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you God Bless the United States of America but I handled it. Alexanders 23:12, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Tables
What kind of table do you need? PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 23:08, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Ahhh, that kind. Then what you need is to add a nationinfo template. Go to the templates, and click on other template/magic word. In the most used template section, it should have it. Then, click it and fill out a form. Here's an example PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 23:15, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Middle School
Yes I really am. PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 23:16, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Why do you ask? PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 23:20, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Why did you think I was joking? PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 23:28, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Hey, my passion and inspiration for being involved in this wiki is my Korean heritage. I always try to reveal the truth about Korea, make it stronger, etc. PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 23:36, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Patorism... I see but why are you anti- Islam

Because it is a religion of hate. Did you know the Qur'an never has one commandment to love anything? I don't mean to offend anyone, but Mohammad was an extremely violent guy. See this. PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 23:53, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, while all religions have had their share of hate, none of them really commands them to hate. The Qur'an, for example, tells Muslims to either crucify, cut off their arms and legs, kill, or banish all Chrisitians and Jews. Christianity, while it does have a history of violence, never commands to hate or kill. Anyways, please check the link. It was helpful to me, and might be for you. PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 23:59, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Adopting Timelines
Since Mitro isn't around at this second, I figured I's answer you. On this wiki, we have rules. Foremost among these is our rules on adopting articles. These are in place for a reason, and you are ignoring them. Mitro has given you a link to them on the Confederate timeline's talk page. I suggest you follow them. Lordganon 00:34, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * What he said. Also Alex, if you actually read the policy you would see that if the user did not respond in a week you can go ahead and adopt the TL.  This is why you should read the rules before complaining about them.  Mitro 16:30, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

I'm going to say this one more time: Don't just post that you are "adopting" a timeline like that again. You've been told the rules repeatedly, and you need to start following them. Don't do it again, or you will be facing consequences. Lordganon 03:55, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

TSPTF
I'm honored, Alex, that you would think of nominating me for the TSPTF, but I really don't think I'm ready enough. First, I'd need to have been on this wiki for 6 months. Second, I'm not yet ready enough to take on the responsibility of the TSPTF. Third, I do not meet the requirements for being in the TSPTF. However, I am again, honored by your thoughts, and thank you.

Sincerely, PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs)

Alexanders, if you want to nominate someone for it, first ask them, and them go here for it. That is how to do it. PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 17:47, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Naming Policy
There is a set way of naming articles on this wiki that you must follow. You've had so many of them by now that it isn't funny anymore, despite you being told several times to follow them. Don't do it again, or you will be facing the consequences. Lordganon 03:51, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Response
Sorry for not answering sooner. Yes, I think I will give the Vestars the upper part of Canada (the islands), maybe Greenland, Parts of Quebec, and parts of Canada. PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 01:20, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

No Islam
No, I will not. That is my TL interest. While you may find it insulting, most people don’t. Tell what you told me to the person who wrote the TL No Islam. PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 00:07, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

Look, that's my TL interest, you have no right to tell me to remove it. PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 00:13, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Pita is right Alex. Despite the validity of his beliefs, you do not have the right to edit another editor's user page.  Do it again and you will be blocked.  Mitro 00:23, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

Your TLs
Which ones would you like me to help you with? PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 02:10, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

New Timeline
Hey Alex. Unfortunately, I don't know enough about ancient Greek technology and culture to contribute to your timeline. I'm also really busy now, and I don't think I'll even be able to update my own timeline for a while. But I wish you luck on your new project. It looks really cool! Cheers! Intellectual Crusader 13:50, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, Alexanders, but I am the same as IC. I am not knowledgeable about Greece, and I really am busy. Sorry. PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 00:39, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

Mitro has retired from the wiki, Alex. You'll have to ask others for their opinions. Lordganon 06:18, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

Well, it's very bad looking - needs to be spell-checked badly. Besides that, you really need to think more about the events you have there, because they aren't possible. Mexico was fighting what amounted to a Civil War at that point in history, and there's no way Lincoln would just give them that territory either. There's other things like that as well. Lordganon 15:19, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

I'll give it a look-see occasionally, but I've really no time on here for another timeline or anything. Lordganon 15:36, March 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * I am using heading to talk of the Vikings ("White Falcon") time line. Anyway, a couple of things. First, always preview your notes and posts to check for dead links. I had to use the search for the time line. Also, if you use the "Source" version of the editor (under "controls" above) it will help in catching spelling errors. Lastly, regarding the "Empire of the White Falcon," I think things happened far too fast in that first century.


 * By the way, you did not follow the naming conventions for that time in making that article. It is a part of the "A Different History" time line, and this portion of the time line needs to be a sub-article of the original article. The format seems to be that of a time line rather than a history, so I'd suggest consolidating your article into a story rather than using datelines. Again, use the "source" mode and preview liberally. Read it aloud to assure that you have not used words that just "sound alike" (for example the proper word for an alliance is "coalition" and not "collation" ) - a spell check won't catch words that are spelled right by used wrong. SouthWriter 21:21, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Featured History Nominations
Alex, I have removed your nomination. You must follow the format and instructions on that page in order to nominate something. I encourage you to nominate it again, using the correct format. Lordganon 08:46, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

Once again, removed. Alex, please read everything before the nomination section again. Lordganon 00:54, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Another two times now, in the last 24 hours, that you've done this again. I encourage you to try it again, but know that you will not be warned about this again, Alex. Lordganon 13:26, June 2, 2011 (UTC)

Alex, you have done it again. I really do not know how you can not follow an obvious template, like everyone else. That was a final warning, you realize that? You now have a day to think about where you went wrong. Apologies, but after a certain point, warnings are simply not going to be given any longer, and you should already know that. I warned you about it here three times, and have removed them without warning you more than that. It's a minor thing, but you do persist in it, so it's only going to be a day, rather than the normal first block. Truly, I am sorry, but I must.

Lordganon 01:03, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

Iran (New Union)
Hello there. I see you have taken an interest in Iran as part of the New Union timeline. Mind if I ask, why would Iranian-Soviet relations deteriorate, while in OTL relations are virtually friendly? I know very little about Iran (excluding its nuclear ambitions), so I am curious as to how you came to this conclusion? Please respond, and I am glad to see more getting involved in the NU timeline ^_^ --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 13:55, April 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * Hm... I guess you are right. I have always found it very odd that Iran would have a good relations with the USSR in TTL (especially since Afghanistan would still be a major Soviet ally). That was you that made the John Kerry article? Very nice. I just want to warn you that my lineup of US Presidents is only a proposal, and I haven't made it canon yet. I am still trying to decide the final lineup. So the possibility that Kerry will be president is 50/50 right now. But I really appreciate you making an article for it. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 14:34, April 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * Feel free to look around. Whatever you find interesting and in need of work, feel free to work on it. If you can think of anything else that I have not made mention to, feel free to write about that. Have fun. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 14:58, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Your note
For starters, "snikering" is not a word, and "seneky" is spelled "sneaky."

There is nothing wrong at all with my telling Nuke about your articles. Despite the note saying people can feel free to contribute, he does have a plan for the timeline, and may not have noticed your attempts at adding to it and that may not agree with his plans had I not told him.

Don't ever talk like that to anyone again.

Lordganon 06:10, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Presidents
Well actually, the page was not canon. I have been working on what the presidential lineup should be, but I have been so busy that I forgot to add it to the page. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:17, April 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, it really doesn't matter. I had no idea that you were working on the US Presidents. Well, since it is still only a proposal, I think I am going to let you take control of the article. The only things I want is that George H. W. Bush gains a second term, and Obama does not become president. Does that sound fair? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:14, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

Empire of the White Falcon
Thanks, I'm currently busy with my own TLs (one of them also about Vikings), but I'll spell-check and contribute where needed. ;) --XterrorX 22:46, April 18, 2011 (UTC)

Would you also like to create a Vestars page or something for the area surrounding the ST Lawrence for A Different History? I had plans for a French colony, but it would be better if you just made the article. Batmanary

Yes I did
I put the Tibet piece in there. I can have a wild imagination at times. Thanks for having me on the page. BarakaThePious 00:18, April 21, 2011 (UTC)

The Rise of the New Samauri
For starters, please sign you posts.

If you left it as what your "short History" says that may be possible, though not very plausible at all. But as the main "The Rise of the New Samauri" article says is just impossible.

Lordganon 16:20, April 21, 2011 (UTC)

Reply
No matter how much you moderate the Soviet Union, it is incredibly unlikely. Lordganon 09:43, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

A Different History
Unfortunately, I am not too knowledgable on the subject of history past the 17th century. But, yes, you should make your Vinland article in that area. Batmanary 02:27, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Templates
i've never made one so sorry. :C Bobalugee1940 01:14, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Portal Templates
Of course! Just press "edit" and copy the following to a template page and type in anything you want:

And of course you should put in a category page so you won't have to type it in every article dealing with your TL (e.g. )

ChrisL123 01:35, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Edit: If you like, I could do it for you. ChrisL123 01:43, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

@ my TL
Hey glad you like it. I currently do not need any help with the timeline so far. However if I need any help I'll let you know. Thanks! ChrisL123 00:38, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

VH
Hello there. No, I am sorry, but I am putting my foot down on there being any kind of humanoid life on Venus... at the present. My idea was that there once was a civilization on Venus, but they have been extinct for millions of years. The main reason I am keeping intelligent life off of Venus is simple, I don't want there to be an Avatar-like situation brewing on Venus. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:00, May 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * I see nothing wrong with that. However, I want to keep this part of my timeline out of the picture until the timeline has developed enough. What are some of the ideas you had in mind? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 16:17, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Luna: Earth II "Map Game"
Hello, Alexanders. You may remember a little while ago you asked if you could do anything for Luna: Earth II. Well, I am currently having a "map game" on the Talk Page. You can contribute a colony if you wish! ChrisL123 03:51, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

reply
thanks i like yours too.:3

Outer Banks
Hi, Alex. I am "hiding" the last part of the recent change you made on the Outer Banks. Though I have not worked on it, or any of my old projects, for some time now, I still need to be contacted before changes are made to articles I oversee. This article was "saved" from obsolescence through efforts I made last year, so I need to "guard" it closely. The problem is, I am shepherding the article on the "Inner Banks" which is still in the Proposal stage. You write of efforts that started last year (2010) towards "intergration" of mainland counties that include the Inner Banks. Efforts have been made to set that area up as independent and a bit isolated. The town you have chosen for the talks on "integration" in July is Williamston, the capital of the Inner Banks (Chowan, Bertie, Martian, Washington [and Beauford] Counties). The main creator of the proposal wanted the town of Washington and did not realize it was not in 'Washington' county, the seat of Beauford county, so I added it for him. The map shows those five counties, purposely leaving out Hyde county assuring a 'buffer' between the survivor states. SouthWriter 03:21, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Outer Banks map
I'm sorry Alex, but I adopted the Outer Banks and am shepherding GB in the developing of the Inner Banks. It is okay to propose an expansion, but changing the map needs to be accomplished AFTER a consultation and discussion of the merits to the proposed expansion. Besides, if the Outer Banks began to incorporate other counties other than Dare county, it wouldn't be the Outer Banks anymore!

I can see an eventual Coastal Carolina, or East Carolina if you will, but let's not change things too suddenly and without warning, okay? SouthWriter 04:08, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Inner Banks
I've tolerated some editing on your part in this article, given you are from the area. But re-naming it, among other things, is too far. Unless you get permission from GB, don't touch it again. I've changed the name back. Lordganon 09:01, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

It's alright, I understand.I know you were just trying to help, but let me give you permission from now on.With you being in the area, that could help a lot with the article. God Bless the United States of America 15:15, June 1, 2011 (UTC)

Axis World
Really don't know what you were thinking Alex, but don't touch any of its articles again. You do not have the permission, nor the right, to do so in any way, shape, or form. Lordganon 13:23, June 2, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
But I did follow the platform, I even copied and pasted from a previous nomination. Alexanders 02:12, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

Oh well if your going to be this superficial I can just read stuff..


 * Alex, the only thing you're doing wrong is not copying and pasting properly. You have to have three equal signs (===) before and after the article you're nominating. This is so it's easier to read the nominations if there are several articles being nominated at once.


 * For example:

Return of the Kennedys
I think this is a really well written article, lots of pictures, etc. ChrisL123 02:19, June 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Supporters


 * Objectors


 * Discussion


 * The sample nomination is there for you to copy and paste to benefit you and other alternate historians on this wikia. ChrisL123 02:19, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks Chris, this will help.

Alex, you were warned time and time again that you were doing it wrong. After a certain point, we can warn no longer, and must block. Considering it was a minor thing, I allowed the privilege of still being able to edit your own talk page, and only made it a day, rather than longer like I would normally have done. Right now, you're making me regret it. May want to stop that, or I will reconsider my leniency.

You came close once with the nominations - but you neglected to remove the parts of the template that need to be removed. Just copy its code and remove those parts, and it works perfectly.

On another note, neither timeline I've seen you try to nominate lately is remotely worthy of it, lol. Please have a look at the guidelines for nominations ;)

Lordganon 02:49, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

alright thank for your leniency L.G, I know I can be a slow learner at times, (espically with computers) Alexanders 02:52, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

Rught now I am actually writing some articles for Return of the Kennedys and have them ready for when the block expires Alexanders 19:17, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

'few more hours Alexanders 23:09, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

RE: RotK
You're welcome :) You timeline is very interesting. In fact, I also was thinking about the idea that Ted Kennedy will gain the 1980 Democratic nomination and the presidential election. Regards! --Katholico 03:01, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

Understand. I will take note about this (in one of my timelines in the spanish wikia Kennedy was elect president). Regards! :) --Katholico 03:29, June 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * Indeed. I was thinking of changing things of the article, but i needed to investigate more about the US elections in this time. Thanks very much for the suggestions! I will use for my history. :) Regards! --Katholico 20:15, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

1983DD NC
If you want Greenville to be called that, fine - though, may I add, it most likely won't be graduated if it is a "People's Republic" of any kind - but don't edit that list like that. It is NOT states, but the communities discovered by explorers. Lordganon 04:36, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

Proposed cite for your collectivist city-state
Hi, Alex. I was thinking about where you might be able to put your city state. It would have to be in an isolated place, settled by a small ban of wondering ideologues. How about if your survivors end up in a place previously abandoned years earlier. I just checked what I wrote about the state of Georgia, and the resort of Jekyll Island was abandoned in the wake of the destruction of Jacksonville to the south. Perhaps you could have a college professor and his loyal students establish a commune there after becoming disillusioned with how the established government of the city-state in their college town (be in Greenville or wherever) was running things. It's something out of the 60's or 70's, but I think it could work. SouthWriter 16:04, June 10, 2011 (UTC)

Hey
Hey Alexanders, I'm glad you enjoyed New England Secession. It took me awhile to finish it, but it is now more or less finished.

WWII fits in under the Landon Administration and Knox Administration as the US is more isolationist than under Roosevelt. Japan doesn't view the US as a threat under Landon and Knox, so Pearl Harbor doesn't happen. Germany's expansion goes unchecked by both the US and Britain, until Hitler is knocking on Chamberlain's door step. When the UK is invaded (instead of bombing raids, the Battle of Britain is a full-blow invasion), the US finally decides to step in. Japan never signed a treaty with Germany, so they remain neutral.

The war takes much longer to complete, as Spanish and Portuguese guerillas help out in almost completely occupied Britain and France. The Soviets end up taking all of Germany because the Americans and British are caught up in France. Spain and Portugal still remain neutral and the guerillas are unfunded by both fascist governments.

All and all, the war is over in 1947. Hitler doesn't commit suicide, and is arrested and put to death by the Soviets.

I will read Return of the Kennedys, though, thanks for posting it! I will make some grammatical and spelling fixes for you.

MAINEiac4434 16:11, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

President Contest
Very much so! Thank you for the invitation.

KingSweden 23:50, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

sure what do i have to do ? octiman10 01:04, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

i might not be able to do this, i dont have a great knowledge of polotics octiman10 16:10, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Re:President Contest
Hmm, looks interesting. I might as well, but I won't be able to do much since I don't have a lot of knowledge of US Presidents, I live in Canada ;) ChrisL123 02:53, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Re: President Contest
I wrote Bicentennial Divergence so why is it a problem? No offence, just wondering. --Antiimperialist 15:01, June 28, 2011 (UTC)

Atlantic Islands
Hey Alex, I've been reading the timeline you've adopted and I am very interested in being apart of it. May I help editing a few things, and perhaps we could start on creating country articles? ChrisL123 17:49, July 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * Assuming no one else currently wants to contribute any nations to the timeline, I decided I might as well ask you if these nations above are okay with you to have in the timeline as countries. If you would like to change any around just let me know, but I think they make the most sense to have (I already stated the articles on the countries,  and the ). ChrisL123 01:38, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Great, I hoped you'd like it. My only problem is with Bermuda; I'm not sure if they should be independent or not. What do you think? ChrisL123 20:29, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

New Union Presidents
Hey Alexanders. I just wanted to know how the Presidential list for the US is coming on the New Union timeline. I am just curious because you have been doing a lot of changes, replacing John Kerry with Al Gore, and getting rid of "W." I have also made the page canon, but I believe it still needs cleanup. Please forgive me for the short and blunt message, but I just got off of work and I can't see the computer screen very well XD --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 03:06, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * George H. W. Bush also didn't get reelected because his foreign policies were no longer needed since the Cold War was over and the USSR had collapsed. But with the USSR continuing, he may have a better change at gaining reelection. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 20:47, July 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, if you are set. Personally, I like Gore more than Kerry. ^_^ --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 01:08, July 7, 2011 (UTC)

Atlantic Islands
Hey, I was reading through your Atlantic Islands timeline, and it looks really interesting. I was wondering how open it is for people to help out, and can people adopt nations and work on them?

Also, how much of the timeline is confirmed canon, because it seems like a few things haven't been fully decided yet. - Mister Sheen 01:06, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

Aboriginal Corner Islands
Hmm, makes sense that the First Nations peoples would live in the Corner Islands (as well as the Kelvin Islands, I assume). I doubt the Iroquois could live in the Corner Islands since they lived closer to Lake Ontario than the coast of America. However, they were said to be expansionist and they did have access to the St. Lawrence river so it wouldn't be impossible for them to make a few settlements there. I think it would be the Mi'kmaq that would have the most settlements and Native population there since they are the closest to the Corner Islands. The Delawares were closer to the Kelvin Islands so I assume there would be a few settlements there. ChrisL123 23:53, July 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, never mind now, I guess. As Lordganon said on my talkpage, these natives didn't have well enough boats to get to the Corner Islands. But with a bit of research, I think there may have been native settlements on Kelvin by and the  (the Delawares), the closest people to the Kelvin Islands living in Cape Cod and Long Island. ChrisL123 01:07, July 7, 2011 (UTC)

ABOASD
Pulling numbers out of thin air = ignorance. And you continue to show that you know nothing of the election. ASB it is. And ASB it will stay until it is made plausible. Lordganon 03:34, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

Hey, don't know if you're busy or not but I would really appreciate some help with L'Uniona Homanus. I'msure you'd provide a lot if you're not too busy. Hidan43vr 19:22, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for accepting. Well the place I feel is weak in the scheme of my timeline in in Mesoamerica and to a lesser extent in North America, though I'm getting more into North America. If you know anything about these cultures or have any ideas so it doesn't seem like everywhere is just cities becoming city-states and then Empires over and over again. I feel they should have something different. I'd like any feedback you have and feel free to bring in anyone else you want. Thanks Hidan43vr 00:42, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

I dont mind those changes, I wasn't much into what I had going anyway.

Something I'm wondering about would be the Aztecs and the Incas and how they could be tied into this later. I want to keep the seven tribes together and maybe have them live in a more northern part of Mexico. But, tell me what you think. I really know more about the Old World civilizations.

Also, would you know any reason why whenever I add a picture, at least now because this never happened before, it would immediately place it at the top of the section that I'm editing, even when the cursor is in another place. Not to mention yesterday I tried to make a simple edit, nothing fancy or that I hadn't done before, and there's a bunch of complex code aroud my pictures and interrupting my text. Just look at the first page for Asia, here, I used to have like six pictures on this page and now I'm afraid to put them back. :( Hidan43vr 10:16, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

Ok, I think this will be the start of a great part of the history. Some things I'd ask for, for continuity's sake, is that you make the dates with AUC time. That is to say, if it is BC then subtract the BC number from 753 and conversely if it is AD then add the AD number to 735. In both cases the AD or BC number would come after it in parentheses. I say this because the calendar of Rome will grow to be a world standard. Another thing would be to categorize these mesoamerican pages with the American and Mesoamerican Timeline Categories.

Something to look forward to in the future is how the North Americans will interact with these people and eventually the time when the Old World and New World meet. All that aside thanks for the help and contributions, I can tell already that your ideas for this part of the world will make a better series on this wiki than I could do alone.

P.S. I guess tha picture thing, where it only goes to the top of the page, can't be helped. Oh well.Hidan43vr 00:16, July 20, 2011 (UTC)

Hey! Just thought I should check in and ask how things are going. Hidan43vr 16:17, July 27, 2011 (UTC)

Nice to see you're back. I don't know exactly when I plan on bringing the Europeans or the East Asians to the Americas. Right now I'm just trying to catch the Asian Timeline up with the European one. I'd like if the American Civilizations could be as developed as is reasonable. I'm not sure when the desire to explore will emerge in either culture. I'm more concerned with when the North American People up in the Great Lakes region will contact the people in the South and what will happen. Pretty soon the Roman Empire will fall apart, not entirely but it will be much smaller. can you tell me some ideas you have so far? Hidan43vr 18:42, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Well that's the plan for North America. The different people of the North east and partially down the east coast. The Mesoamericans and South West of the US, I'm leaving essentially to you. Hidan43vr 23:01, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Just saying hi :3 Hidan43vr 15:16, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

Hey, wondering if something is wrong. You haven't been on recently, just checking up. Hidan43vr 16:26, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

Okay. If you don't mind I'd like to ask what you have for the Mesoamericans. Thanks Hidan43vr 14:42, August 3, 2011 (UTC)

Sounds pretty good. Feel free to erase the things here and rename the page, except have the (L'Uniona Homanus) at the end of course, and fill it with that narrative. I'm sure it'll be great.Hidan43vr 12:14, August 4, 2011 (UTC)

Atlantic Islands
Don't worry about it, it's hard to keep track of things with this whole "following" system, and I have no idea why they removed our watchlists (technically you can still get to your watchlist with that link, but they've made it so difficult to find).

I have actually been chipping in with the Atlantic Islands map game (I was the Danish, who were understandably some of the least successful colonists), and I look forward to starting more work on the main timeline after the map game is all finished. - Mister Sheen 21:48, August 4, 2011 (UTC)

Building the Human Union
Communism as a distinct ideology hasn't been invented yet. Capitalism has been termed as Cambissima in the Roman Empire. I think that Communism should originate from somewhere, and the Aztecs or Inca or other Mesoamerican Civilizations would be the most logical. Hidan43vr 17:36, August 18, 2011 (UTC)

That could probably work. I'm not sure about the scale but I will definitely consider putting that in the next part of the Roman Timeline. I don't want Rome to break up all at once, if the revolution is for independence and not just to overthrow their current managers and overlords. The Cimbrian Alliance could influence one and add another Kingdom to their country. Its a possiblility that could have many different turns and ramifications.

I Just saw the changes you made to the Mesoamericans page and I like it. Keep up the goodness. Hidan43vr 17:53, August 18, 2011 (UTC)

Principia Moderni
Hi. I was wondering if you were still participating in Principia Moderni. I am sure there are many other players who would be willing to take over your country, so let me know if you are still interested in playing. Detectivekenny (Info; Talk) 21:27, August 22, 2011 (UTC)

Republic of Vinland (A Different History)
Hey Alex! I just got back from a multi-month wiki break, and I have decided to focus on finishing my current articles.One of the areas I am focusing on is the United States article at A Different History.However, your Vinland article has caused some problems preventing me from finishing my article.Could I adopt yours, so as to finish both?

God Bless the United States of America 03:07, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

Third Riech
Can I be a mod on the map game since there is 3 open slots?

DeanSims 19:29, August 27, 2011 (UTC)