User blog:Warrioroffreedom123/The Problem With "The Dragon Splits"

When I created my blog post, pointing out some implausbilities that "Scotland says Yes" had, my main issue was the Manchu revolt. Now they have moved it to another timeline, "The Dragon Splits" Problem is, that just moves the problem, not gets rid of it. A Manchuria revolt is very implausbile itself, as Manchus hardly compose 10% of the population in Manchuria, and I doubt Han Chinese would fight alongside the Manchus, as they are very bitter about what happened during the Qing Dynasty. However, doing further research, that was only one of the implausbilites. Ethnic Mongols only make up 17.13 percent of Inner Mongolia, and 79.`17 percent in Han, so I don't think such a revolt would be plausible. And seriously, Mongolian intervention? Mongolia has a population of 2 million! It cannot intervene in a country of 1.3 billion. Then, there is the Hong Kong uprising, wtf. If such a bloody uprising occured, the PLA would just role in tanks and easily crush the rebels. It is not plausible. Also, Kazakhastan wouldn't intervene in the Uyghur conflict, as the PLA would just roll throgh Kazakhastan quickly and bomb the hell out of them. Also, the Uyghur conflict itself has some flaws. Uyghur make up 45% of the population, but it is still 40% han, so any Uyghur uprising would face severe contesting with the Han population. However, there is one plausible part, which is the Tibetan uprising, as Tibetans are still a majority in thier homeland. However, even a Tibetan uprising has it's issues, as Tibet has a population of ONLY 3.18 MILLION. A user on chat pointed out it's highly likely the creaters of the authors are sinophobes who want to create a timeline where china burns, and while I cannot take that theory 100% and they could be fair people who just don't know China that well, it is unfortunatly a very likely possiblity at this point sadly.