User talk:SouthWriter/sandbox/An atheist's objections/@comment-1943951-20100706041332

you say that because science cant explain why the universe was born, science is wrong and therefore must be regected. that's logical fallacy. if science can't explain something NOW, that doesn't simply imply that science is inadequate, simply that sciences has explained it yet. 100 years ago, science couldn't explain why the sun kept burning. so does Gods will keep that giant ball of fusing hydrogen there? no. also, why would God (who, according to the bible, is a kind and loving god) create a universe in which simple observation would drive humans away from Him? finally, you state that "no new information is gained" when adaptation and speciation occurs. let's assume for a moment that Adam and Eve really did exist, and they had caucasiod features. so, when their descendents encountered the harsh african sun, how would they have adapted to their environment without "adding new information"?