Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-10975360-20131208111308/@comment-4621372-20131210231052

SOCr? Just as one example? I can think of at least 5 others.

Viva, the Military thinkers said so in scenarios that could not have actually occurred. Assuming a POD post 1918, such a scenario would not have occurred. They were Counterfactual Historians, not Alternate Historians, and were not aiming for plausibility. Sam IS. In any plausible scenario, they would all give Britain the victory.

And Viva, this is "Alternate history wiki", not "let's just make up random shit and call in Alternate history wiki"

Finally, umm are you joking? A nation surrounded by more powerful Arab nations in the North, nothing but basically unlivable jungle in the south, and desert/dry plain in the West- and of course a small sea in the East, which is controlled by said Arab nations?

And you want that to conquer SIBERIA.

Cyprus notwithstanding (what mod dealt with that?), what you've done in PMII is exceedingly implausible even by those standards.

Arrogance? Sure. It's better than stubborn idiocy, which seems to be your forte.