User talk:DRAFIGO13

Naming Articles
The two most recent articles you have made violate the naming rules of this Wiki. Please read the rules before establishing any more articles. Thank you. -- 14:40, January 5, 2018 (UTC)


 * The rules clearly state how articles should be named. But for clarification.
 * What you named them → What they should've been named (according to the rules)
 * Weimar Republic-fascist reich → Weimar Republic (Fascist Reich)
 * Battles Of The great war-Fascist Reich → Battles of the Great War (Fascist Reich)


 * Your timeline's name NEEDS to be in parentheses at the end of the title. Your article should also be written as if it were a Wikipedia article (i.e., proper grammar). -- 14:51, January 5, 2018 (UTC)

Re:Templates
Here. -- 02:57, January 6, 2018 (UTC)

Re:Maps
I'm a map maker. What exactly do you need help with? -- 04:17, January 8, 2018 (UTC)

Royalty Template
Hello! I did not make the template for my ruler in my timeline. I used the royalty infobox template which can be found here. Many other useful infoboxes can be found here.

I hope this helps :) ArmsSpaghetti (talk) 12:36, January 8, 2018 (UTC)

Re:Re:Royalty Template
No worries! Also welcome to help out a fellow newbie on the wiki. I suggest you take a look around at other peoples timelines, their user pages etc to get a grasp about the stylises and guidelines in order to produce content. I noticed you have trouble accessing templates and content you wish to use. I suggest adding useful pages to your user page as a reference for yourself. I wish you all the best.

ArmsSpaghetti (talk) 13:29, January 8, 2018 (UTC)

Fascist Reich
Hey. I noticed that many of your pages within your timeline didn't have a uniform standard and the grammar needed rectifying. I have made these changes and I hope that they will help you as a guide to try and keep to a wikia standard from now on. I have also reorganised your main page so that the timeline flows better. I hope these changes are positive and if you wish for further aid do not hesitate to contact me. Furthermore, if you wish to revert any of these changes this can be done in the history section of each specified page.

ArmsSpaghetti (talk) 10:30, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

I'm wondering about the name of this timeline, just out of curiosity (due to it being a timeline where Fascism and Communism never rose) why is it called Fascist Riech? (just curious not critical) Baron Joshua (talk) 23:05, January 24, 2018 (UTC)

MF Portal
The portal I made was made using the Navbox template. This is a native template used on wikipedia and can be found here. Check out both links so you can understand how I got my end result but I highly recommend also using the wikipedia documentation to make your own too.

ArmsSpaghetti (talk) 14:06, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

Re:Re:MF Portal
No problem. In future, if you're writing to people's talk pages, it's best to use a Heading 2 style in order to title your message to them. This is to prevent it being lost in other's messages to the talk page and also gives some subject to whomever's talk page it is. I understand that no matter how many resources are provided by the Althistory wiki, there is still a lot to learn. It'll come naturally and gradually. Don't worry if you're struggling initially. As always, happy to help with anything I can.

ArmsSpaghetti (talk) 14:14, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

'Thing'
Well it would help if you provided some further information of what you need help with. There's a limit to what I know and can help with.

ArmsSpaghetti (talk) 10:06, January 11, 2018 (UTC)

Re:Re:'Thing'
Okay well start an article for the war in your timeline and we can discuss it further on the articles talk page.

ArmsSpaghetti (talk) 10:12, January 11, 2018 (UTC)

Finnish War of Independence (Fascist Reich)
Please do not discuss this topic on my talk page any further. Use the talk page on the Article instead.

ArmsSpaghetti (talk) 10:38, January 11, 2018 (UTC)

Audio files
To upload an audio file, use this page. To add an audio file to an article, simply use where AudioFile is the upload name and .format is the format of the audio file (usually .mp3 or .ogg).

ArmsSpaghetti (talk) 10:42, January 11, 2018 (UTC)

Naming conventions
I am going to stop renaming all of your articles. You must conform to a singular style i.e.



e.g.



exactly like this. Your timeline name should be capitalized. There should be a single space between the article name and the timeline name. The timeline name should be enclosed in brackets. The article name should be as short and concise as possible. The Kingdom of Italy should just be Italy. Longer, official titles can be specified within an infobox or in the article itself. It seems reminders and changes made for you have not got this idea to you. Furthermore, advice for articles: if you have information within an infobox, you do not need to repeat it in the article. I.e if the birth date is provided and the parents are already specified, there is no need to directly specify these details within the article unless it is imperative to provide further information. I hope I have made this clear enough for you and I only provide this so you can start doing this work yourself rather than retroactively by someone else. Do not feel afraid to contact me further with questions or advice.

ArmsSpaghetti (talk) 16:05, January 12, 2018 (UTC)

Re:Conflict Infobox
What is it that you need help with?

ArmsSpaghetti (talk) 16:30, January 16, 2018 (UTC)

Re:Re:conflict infobox
before I give you any help have you looked at the documentation for the infobox?

ArmsSpaghetti (talk) 21:30, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

Treaty infobox
I've already linked where you can find templates and specifically infobox templates.

ArmsSpaghetti (talk) 21:27, January 18, 2018 (UTC)

Re:Categories
Welcome

Re:Collab
Sure! What article would you like collaboration on?

Alright, I accept.

I see, well I'll be happy to expand upon this! Along with an addition on what they do with Ireland. I'll also be happy to do a collaboration on china, as I know a lot about Chinese History and such.

China would stay a republic, and the Kuomintang would stay conservative, and non-revolutionary, and Chiang Kai-Shek would'nt have much influence from Japan and Germany to recreate the Kuomintang and China into a Nationalist Authortarian State, and instead would be an, Semi-Normal, Conservative Kuomintang politician who wants china to be respected on the world stage and to be a great power, and to be unified. China most likely would still be faced with instability, and warlords would still be a problem, and without Chiang to keep china a stabilized one Party state, china would face a greater challenge on reuniting China, as freedom of speech and multi-partyism would rock the republic around like crazy, and could lead to more instability. Chiang Still would try his best, and would defiantly still be effective. As for Mao and his Communists, since communism doesn't exist in this timeline, i see Chinese democracy and the Republic of China lasting for centuries to come, and would slowly evolve into a global superpower, when given the chance to, if they ever unify and develop their economy and military power, I also see much support from nations around the world towards the Chinese Republican cause. Mao would most likely stay a Kuomintang party member, like he was historically before he left and created the CCP (Chinese Communist Party).

Well, Britain would most likely give up Ireland, if not, they'll have to face constant rebellion from Irish Nationalist Groups, which would fight for their independence, so most likely they would release Ireland, but under a free state, which would then cause great anger among Irish nationalists and republicans, and would then kick of the Irish civil war, again, like in real life, now the outcome of the civil war could determine, in our timeline the Irish free staters would win, due to British support, but it could depend in this timeline.

Then again, if the British were desperate enough, especially after India, their most prized possession of all of their empire, they could of hanged on to Ireland if they were worried that revolution could bring a downfall to their empire.

...
... I didn't. -- 03:38, January 21, 2018 (UTC)


 * You were also warned about the site naming rules. Your most recent article doesn't meet them (again).


 * Great Brittain(Fascist Reich) ≠ Great Britain (Fascist Reich)


 * Please don't let this continue. -- 03:42, January 21, 2018 (UTC)

Alright

May I create the China article for Fascist Reich now?

Re:India
Ehhh, hard to say, it most likely would be a Principality/Kingdom, since there are princes in India tha, under the British, hand a wide range of control over their province.

Re:Naming
No, you didn't name it correctly.

You named your article "India(Fascist Reich)", there is no space between "India" and the timeline's name. The article's name should be "India (Fascist Reich)" (notice the space).

This is the exact same issue you were just warned about with your previous four articles (British-Brunei War, Great Britain, Pedro III, and Brazil).

You have been warned about this multiple times, yet still fail to follow them. Any future misnamed article by you will automatically be deleted. -- 13:49, January 23, 2018 (UTC)

Muhammad Mahabat Khan III Khanji, he was an Indian Prince who ruled over his province for a long while.

Welcome

Re:Sweden-Norway
Nah, the Swedish-Norwegian union wasn't really a country; officially? Yes, Physically? No. The Sweden-Norway union was like a very loose and very Autonomous confederation between the 2 countries, infact, both countries kept their own armed forces, their own currencies, their own state churches, Constitutions, laws, administrations and leglislatives. There is no way the Swedish-Norwegian Union could of lasted any longer then it already did, I'm even surprised that it even survived for almost a century! Also, Norwegians were pretty nationalistic, and wanted their own independent state for a long while by then, and the government allowed them to have a plebiscite on if the Union should be dissolved, which they overwhelmingly voted "yes" (around 99.5% of the vote actually). So it's certain that the Sweden-Norway union wouldn't survive long enough to see world war 1 or even the aftermath of it, as the only thing that basically United these nations was that they had the same monarch.

Re:American Civil War
I don't think the confederate states would be reformed, and even if it did try for some reason, and wouldn't be to reestablish slavery. If there was a second American civil war, which is a, sort of plausible, scenario, then it would be against a coalition of socialist movements and political parties, along with communists, as communism surged in popularity during the Great Depression, and I could see a possible revolution and then civil war break out in America, given roosevelt never becoming president thus never allowing the "New Deal" policy to be put in place, and which could ring a lot of civil dissent a much instability, and lead to rise and extreme increase in popularity for the Communist Party USA and other socialist and communist organizations across America. Again, it's not super plausible, especially since most Americans wouldn't take it to those extremes and try and revolt, but instead would vote for far right parties, if the situation got dire enough.