Talk:1983: Doomsday

Before you start editing, please read the Editorial Guidelines.

Discussion Archives: | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 | Page 7 | Page 8

Former Proposals: | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 | Page 7 | Page 8 | Page 9

=GENERAL DISCUSSION= The following is for general discussion to improve the TL that does not involve article proposals Structured into rough sections for easier navigation.

Countries/Regions/Politics
Archives: Page 1 Page 2

National Parks
Could Someone create a page for the national parks of Doomsday? Both the ones established before and after Doomsday. I could imagine the site of the former US District of Columbia being turned into a National Park by Virginia. The mix of the restored/rebuilt famous bulidings (White House, Capital Building, Washington and Lincoln Memorials) and the vegetation would give the site an Angkor Wat-like air to it.

Supersonic91 04:23, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * They would keel over dead before they got to the blast site, from the radiation. --BrianD 04:27, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

of course, that doesn't keep them from declaring the area to be an "off limits national historic site"

in all honesty, national Parks don't make sense in a post doomsday world. The phrasing is obsolete, and survival is at the utmost. as a general rule, National parks are a western phenomen, (those that aren't in the west were made for west), and don't really help a nation to survive. something like a national park may exist, but outside of ANZC, I don't see who would have a "national Park". sorryDesert viking 04:33, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Fine. I could see the Virginians making DC a "National Historic Site". And one of the punishments in Virginia is hard labour in radioactive territory. Its how they got their infastructure back up so quickly.

Supersonic91 15:25, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Is the ADC larger?
According to the Western Sahara (1983: Doomsday) article, the was part of an international force that kicked the Sicilians from Gibraltar in 2005. This makes me wonder whether Rif would actually be a part of the when it was formed in 2007. They would be enemies of Sicily as well and several current members of the ADC were part of that international force. I think it is likely that Rif was a founding member of the alliance. Mitro 17:14, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
 * All right then, I don't see why not. --DarthEinstein 17:25, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

And what about Bermuda and the East Carribean Federation? They seem to be prime candidates for an enlargement of the ADC, or perhaps observers.--Vladivostok 20:42, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
 * Bermuda was only discovered in 2009, so though they might be a potential member in the future, some time will need to pass to take care of the preliminary negotiations. As for the ECF, well the ADC was pretty much created to fight and contain expansionist Sicily. Canada is a member though despite not being anywhere near Sicily, but I think that is because they have a lot to lose if the route through the Mediterranean Sea is blocked. Would the ECF have the same interest? Mitro 15:48, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
 * The ECF might be more affiliated economically with the SAC because it is so close. Canada on the other hand was fairly isolated before the late 80s when they contacted the other future members of the ADC. So I think that Canada would have more trade going on with the other ADC members than the ECF would. Also, is it possible that a few of those French and Spanish successor states might be part of the ADC? Monaco and Andorra especially, since they are apparently the gateways in to former France and Spain. --DarthEinstein 16:18, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
 * I think we can make an argument that anyone who was a target for Sicilian aggression was a founding member of the ADC, or at least joined later. Mitro 16:19, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

Granted, the ECF would be economically closer to the SAC nations, but perhaps it would try to uphold stronger relations with with other nations in the Anglosphere. And one other thing I've been meaning to ask: How strong are the ADC and ANZC ties today? Would they support them in a cold war against SAC? Sort of like OTL Great Britain supporting the U.S.?--Vladivostok 08:39, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * Only 2 nations in the ADC are technically a part of the Angloshere (Canada and the Celtic Alliance), but I could see them join a revitalized Commonwealth of Nations. As for the ANZC, the article does say that they are close with the ADC, but SAC nations have aided the member states of the ADC in conflicts against Sicily. Mitro 04:36, December 27, 2009 (UTC)


 * The "Anglosphere" is i think an issue some people would love to discuss...
 * Given the old NATO structures and fellow associations (ANZUS, Commonwealth etc.) a close tie (as always stated) in between ADC and ANZC seems natural, at least militarical... this should stay and being kept. They are just natural allies in a world with few alternatives...right number 3 or for along with Siberia, right behind SAC and ANZC.--Xi&#39;Reney 23:35, January 11, 2010 (UTC)

the nations of the ECF currently place a role as the middle ground for several nations in OTL (in particular, Cuba and Venusalua on one side and the US on the other). It is possible they have a less neutral and relaxed mentality in TTL, but why not? I can't see them strong enough to pick a side without being thoroughly absorbed, so its quite possible they have good relations with most everyone, like in OTL. I could see them joining or staying out of the alliance, but I don't really seeing them to commiting to anything.128.187.80.2 17:16, January 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I like the idea of the East Caribbean states as a middle ground, although there's really only one big dog in town now, and that's South America. So you could ask, the middle ground between who and whom? There are also signs that the ECF is acting as sort of a regional power in its own right, as the chief representative of Anglophonery in the Caribbean. It is mentioned, for example, as being very influential in Haiti and the Neth. Antilles. The ECF is still small and poor, no doubt, but they seem to have a certain prestige that lets them punch above their weight diplomatically - another great old English tradition! But I also don't see them joining the Atlantic Defense Community. The ADC powers actually see themselves as neutral players between South America and Australia-New Zealand, despite their natural friendliness with the latter. If the ADC expanded into the Caribbean, South America could well see them as a threat, and that would sour relations between the two blocs.
 * On the other hand, I proposed that Luxembourg was invited to join the ADC as an observer only - it's not strong enough to participate as a full member - and that it will probably get this status sometime this year. I saw this as a gesture toward a founding member of NATO that had made it through the cataclysm successfully. Are there any other potential observers that can be described as "friends of the ADC"? Benkarnell 23:02, January 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Would Woodbridge be a possible candidate for ADC observer status?? Verence71 12:21, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Germany
Prussia is going to start moving west and south, and I wanted some input on which areas might have survived Doomsday. I made up a rough map of possible political boundaries down the road. This would be after the area has stabilized into more or less solid political units (how stable they are is up for debate). Nations in the map are: That map wouldn't be accurate until probably 2020 at least, but thats the basic idea. Right now Prussia is beginning to expand into its claimed territory, and will likely encounter Weimar and Northeim as they are beginning to solidify their control on their areas. The protestent churches in Hesse are further integrating into a single United Hessian Church and are acting a unifying influence on the surviving populace. The Württembergs in Ravensburg had been gathering a private army with their money and influence in order to keep the area safe for themselves and have been pressured into using it to tame the surrounding lands. The Rheinland Confederation is in its infancy, and Bavaria is undergoing reconstruction with aid from the Alpine Confederation. North Germany I would think is beginning to take control of the lands between their controlled regions. Anyone else want to add to this, rip it apart, etc? --Oerwinde 08:13, January 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Rheinland Confederation - An alliance of small municipalities and city states with a rotating capital
 * Northeim - A city state based out of the city of Northeim
 * Weimar - A city state based out of the city of Weimar
 * Hessen - A protestent theocratic republic
 * Franken - Northern Bavaria decides against joining the Alpine Confederation and becomes an independent republic
 * Saar - Small feudal nation, ruled by the Sheriff, who was head of a military unit that survived DD and was able to establish order through brute force and oaths of loyalty. Not evil, just does what he thinks needs to be done.
 * Württemberg - Constitutional Monarchy based out of Ravensburg.
 * Alpine Confederation - Southern Bavaria joins the Alpine Confederation in 2015.
 * Württemberg - Constitutional Monarchy based out of Ravensburg.
 * Alpine Confederation - Southern Bavaria joins the Alpine Confederation in 2015.

i like the idea. but i hop no one develops it to the extent of the nations shown in the map. as of 2009, Germany is in a very rough way. HAD 00:15, January 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes its in a really bad way right now, but we have 3 major nations now that will be a major stabilizing influence, either gobbling up territory, or uniting others so to not be gobbled up. Radiation isn't even a factor anymore. The map was only a guideline anyway, theres obviously room for more city states and such, though I would have the Alpine Federation, Prussia, and North Germany being the dominant.


 * Maybe the North German Foreign Office has made maps like this showing their vision for the next decade in Germany. (Prussia's Foreign Office probably has maps that look very different indeed ;-)) Now do all of these states exist right now in some form? They would all need some sort of justification, of course, to make sure everyone agrees with their creation. I personally have no problem with them. Probably Germany's map looks a lot like France or Spain - tiny permanent settlements that claim larger regions of the country. Benkarnell 14:57, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well Württemberg right now is only a small region surrounding Ravensburg. As momentum builds smaller communities join willingly and warlords surrender in exchange for amnesty. I figured it would be something similar to Prussia only on a smaller scale. The old royal family plays a major part in the establishment of the nation and in thanks the monarchy is restored, although in a similar role to modern monarchs. They wouldn't be established as a nation until about 2014-2018. Saar is well on its way, and the Rheinland Confederation will have begun forming in the south of the area in response from Saar aggression. Hessen doesn't exist yet, but the protestent church there is starting to band communities together. I would say possibly the outline of a nation sometime by 2016. Weimar and Northeim would exist but to a much lesser degree, probably only controlling a third or less of the territory on the map. Franken would be established sometime after the Bavarian vote in 2015 with joint aid from Prussia and the Alpine Confederation. --Oerwinde 20:04, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

North Germany in my perspective is heading for a Socialist rule. It seems that a socialist party would be able to gain a foothold with mass unemployment. I also think that North Germany and the Kingdom of Prussia may have a war on their hands. I think North Germany and Prussia would dived the land between themselves and the Alpine Confederation. Cheifaugust 23:19, January 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Prussia and N.Germany will have high tensions in the next couple months but the Prussian Reichstag will force King Christian to abdicate, and his son will be much more diplomatic.Oerwinde 19:55, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

mass unemployment doesn't normally lead to socialism. the UK had mass unemployment in the thirties and the communists only got one MP.HAD 18:19, January 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * About North Germany - wouldn't Schleswig-Holstein petition for admission to the Scandinavian Countries? Up until WWII it was part of Denmark, wasn't it? Louisiannan 16:46, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Prussia and Denmark fought over it for years, and Prussia won in the mid 1800s. Holstein always considered itself German, while Schleswig was divided. It was split between Germany and Denmark after a referendum following WWI in which Northern Schleswig voted 80% to join Denmark, and southern voted 80% to remain German. The North Germany article mentions Denmark seeking unification, but eventually that idea was scrapped.Oerwinde 10:26, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Kylie
would kylie manuige or whatev here name is still be alive?--HAD 19:44, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Probably not. She would have been 14 in 1983 and thus would probably have been living at home with her parents in Melbourne which was nuked on Doomsday Verence71 11:03, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's still possible she survived: a nuclear attack only kills a minority of people in a city, according to every projection I've seen. And remember that man who died last month who survived both Hiroshima and Nagasaki? We've been counting on close to 100% fatality because of the aftereffects, but those would be diminished in Australia where they could evacuate the survivors, food would still be plentiful, and most of the infrastructure survived. So we can probably assume a higher survival rate for the Australian attacks. Benkarnell 12:19, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

on the above note, the fatalities would depend on the city and the number of warheads that detonated, as well as their yeild. 4 SS-20 IRBMs, with 3 150KT warheads, would probably wipe out london, for example. my orginal point was that whe might become a popular eaintertaine if she suvived. or she might have not and become a doctor or a soilder or something. --HAD 14:36, February 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * The Minogues were brought up in Surrey Hills, a suburb of Melbourne about 14kms from the city centre. Would that make any difference to their chances of survival?? Verence71 15:23, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

yeah. thats quite far away. if a 1MT bomb detonated, she would have got 2nd degree burns. if a 100KT bomb detonated, she probably would have been unharmed. HAD 20:13, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

In 1983 both Minogue sisters were working in showbiz but Dannii was more famous than Kylie. It's not inconcievable that in a post-Doomsday Australia they could both still be working in the media Verence71 16:06, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

this has posibbilities. U2 and Kylie Minogue might be two of the biggest groups/singers in the world. Also, is there a chance that Ricky Martin of Living la Vida Loca fame might still be alive? --HAD 14:27, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Co-operation between the British survivor nations
Presumably there are trade links between the Celtic Alliance, Cleveland, Northumbria and Woodbridge but at some point would there also be political links?? I'm not talking about a unified country but perhaps an organisation along the line of the OTL European Union in order to give the four nations a larger voice on the European and world stages.

Another idea I had was for annual sporting competitions between the four nations along the line of the old Home Internationals in football and Six Nations in rugby union. Verence71 16:30, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

North Sea Oil
What happened to the rigs during/after Doomsday?? Verence71 15:56, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

they probably survied the immediate. the crews probably fled to either the Nordic Union or the Celtic Alliance. I don't know if the rigs themselves could have survived 27 years of neglet. Thn agian, according to life after people, the USS missouri's hull is expected to last about 20,000 years Without maintiance. --HAD 14:30, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

I was more concerned with the oilfields in the southern North Sea many of which are connected to the Bacton Gas Terminal on the coast of Norfolk. I think it's concievable that that terminal could eventually come under the control of Woodbridge should that nation expand out of Suffolk. Alternatively Bacton itself could become the centre of a seperate small survivor state Verence71 10:52, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Adopting the Confederación Iberica (1983: Doomsday)
Tristan has been absent for some time, and the CI plays into my hands perfectly. I plan on changing nothing of it's past, only leading it into an Aragonese confederation whose central government has quite a bit of power. If Tristan comes back and doesn't like the changes, I'm more than happy to change them back and he and I can discuss them and change them to something that makes us both happy. Mr.Xeight 02:22, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well you need to follow the . I believe we agreed on a 3 month period of inactivity (Tristan is up to 2 months) and you need to contact the old caretaker as well first (which you have not done). Sorry if I sound like a jerk but this is why we have the guidelines in the first place. Mitro 03:57, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

It's not what you say, but how you say it. Mr.Xeight 01:01, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

The fate of the British Indian Ocean Territory aka Chagos Islands
The fate of the British overseas territories is known. The only exception seems to be the British Chagos Islands. Was it nuked because of the Diego Garcia base? Which nation would claim and actually control the islands after Doomsday, the Seychelles, Mauritius/R.T.A., ANZC or New Britain? What do you think? Grand Prince Paul II. 22:23, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know much about it, but reading Wikipedia, the base sounds highly strategic, if small. It's a Navy base and part of the Strategic Space Command network. Very likely a target, if you ask me.
 * Intriguingly, by 1983 the entire native population had been re-settled in Mauritius and the Seychelles, to make room for that base. Maybe some of them have gone back to Chagos, and it's now a dependency of either Mauritius or Seychelles. Benkarnell 22:41, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Surely as New Britain is a naval nation, it would only make sense for them to claim it as their own. Bob 18:37, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * I've opposed most N. British expansion every step of the way (I pretty much see NB as an idea barely within the bounds of plausibility that is always trying to burst out). But in this case, I think this is something they would do. NB has a known history of exploring former British islands and annexing them through the cunning use of flags... What do you say to this sample TL?
 * 1999: The Seychelles lead a resettlement of 500 Chagossians to the archipelago, and annex the islands.
 * 2003: New Britain sends an expedition and is surprised to find the islands inhabited.
 * 2006: New British naval expedition captures the Chagos. The Seychelles do not have the military hardware to oust them.
 * 2008: The Seychelles settle on a blockade. This state of affairs basically continues today: New British forces occupy the Chagos, but are cut off from home. The blockade is occasionally run, so they have enough supplies to survive, but NB has been unable to break the blockade. Benkarnell 19:18, February 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * That seems to make perfect sense to me. I would prefer it if Chagos remains inhabited. On another note, I wrote down about NB encouraging immigration from the Commonwealth to NB to bolster their relatively low population. I take it the Australian Aborigines are still in a pretty unpleasant condition as OTL. Well I was thinking that they consent to emigrate to NB to escape the cycle of drugs and crime in their homeland. Not all of them obviously. Only about 1000. Bob 19:30, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see as how the Seychelles could have the naval might to maintain an effective blockade against New Britain.Oerwinde 20:05, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Graphics / Visualization /Cartography
Section Archives: Page 1

Google Earth historical pictures
I stumbled upon this article

Googleearth historical pictures ... does anyone know/see any use for us here? aby experiences made with this?

Xi&#39;Reney 12:07, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

New World Map
Due to size, the discussion for the new world map has been moved here: File talk:World83DD v1.2.PNG. Mitro 17:57, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * We really need to get this finished. The old map is way to out of date. Mitro 03:03, January 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Riley.Konner 18:28, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * New version under construction: File:World map feb 10.png. Discussion can move to File talk:World map feb 10.png. Benkarnell 16:32, February 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * I like itOwen1983 16:43, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Good job on the map, Ben! BrianD 00:08, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Fabulatious! this is brilliant. well done ben!--HAD 11:04, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Great map and thanks for adding Woodbridge :) Has anyone thought about adding regional map ie for North American, Europe and Africa?? Verence71 13:34, February 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * North America.Oerwinde 08:04, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

I love the new map, but I have a few issues with it.

1.The borders for Virginia and Lincoln are still too small.The Lincolnites control every part of Nebraska the NAU doesn't, and Virginia controls the portion of Kentucky on the Cumberland Plateau. Both nations should have their borders be up to the borders of their neighboring nation (NAU for Lincoln and Kentucky for Virginia)

2.The Assiniboians control not only a larger territory in Canada, but a chunk of North Dakota large enough to get the Lakotans riled up.

3.I am seeing nations that as far as i can tell do not have articles to back up their existence. For example, I couldn't find any refrence to Mali

Yankovic270 02:10, February 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * Mali is mentioned on the West African Union page as a potential member along with Burkina Faso. Oerwinde 08:04, February 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, the WAU page is where the existence of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Benin is mentioned. It also says that Sierra Leone is in "political turmoil" which I took to mean it's disunited like South Africa and Angola and Liberia. I admit that I assumed the boundary for Mali, but it's the natural one (following the northern edge of the Niger valley) so I think it's OK. The only other border that I completely made up was my old nemesis, German Southwest Africa. I would have liked to mark it as one of the italic nations (we know it exists, but have no idea of its location or size), but I had to mark it purple to show its membership in the New Union.
 * As for the size of Lincoln and Virginia, I know we've talked about that a lot, but it's been a while, so a refresher can't hurt. Virginia's borders were made by Darth Einstein in his original (File:Doomsday 2009.png, and they seemed about right: basically West Virginia, plus a bit more in all directions. It's already the largest nation (by territory) west of the Mississippi. I thought consensus opinion was that this is the most likely and correct size for it, but then again, I don't remember if that's consensus or just my own opinion.
 * For Lincoln, I admit I did shrink Darth Einstein's borders for it. My thoughts: (1) the size I depicted is already quite huge for a city-state; (2) Lincoln would have little need to expand much beyond that (it's all pretty much nomad-inhabited prairie anyway), and indeed expanding needlessly would only create extra expense; and (3) even if it did expand, it's probably not going to pay much attention to the old Nebraska border, which is at this point a fairly meaningless straight line.
 * Anyway, that was what I was thinking. I honestly had thought the matter was settled but I see I was wrong. I'm more than open to correction if I was too hasty. 207.177.213.142 16:23, February 3, 2010 (UTC) (Benkarnell)

Virginia would still have a border with the neighboring Kentucky, due to its territory in the former US state of the same name. If you had read the article I created on Lincoln you would have known that it is not just a citystate. It is an independant republic governed by the remains of the Nebraska state government. As such most of its citizenry, while gaining an independant identity as Lincolnites, believe that Lincoln is the sucessor to the old US state they feel it is their duty to reclaim as much of the state's territory as possible. And since the Lakotan territory disputes with Assiniboia are now canon they need a cause. namely the Assiniboian territory in North Dakota. I keep bringing these issues up because I want my ideas to be properly illustrated. The borders i decscribed are what I consider my nations to look like.

Yankovic270 17:27, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

well, how the borders would be drawn depend on who is drawing the map. In modern times, we would probably do this fancy dotted line thing and then color the area the color of the audience's choice--- or whoever administers the area. I also think that part of this is the inner struggle for greatness, where a writer proposes an idea, an the rest of us say "that's too big, too fast, and too advanced". then we kind of scuffle over it until map's come out. Quite personally, I do not see how a state where people worship Abraham Lincoln is going to thrive. Exist-- possible. grow to the size of the state of nebraska? Highly unlikely. Religions historically don't "pop" into existance, particuarly dramatically new ones.Desert viking 20:38, February 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * This map is supposed to be totally unbiased in that it shows effective control, not claims. No doubt Lincoln's home-made maps show it encompassing all of Nebraska. And DV, I think that "Lincolnism" is a religious movement within the republic that is still in minority. I'm sure it gets lots of attention and is something of an embarassment for mainstream Lincolnians: I can imagine that many people in North America believe Lincoln to be full of people worshipping Abe. But it's not the official state religion or anything... at least, that was my understanding when I read it (and yes Yank, I've read it, many times). @Yank - being an "independent republic" does not preclude being a city-state: Rome and Athens managed just fine as both for quite a long time, as has Singapore more recently. I had honestly thought that in the discussions of it everyone agreed that it couldn't take up all of Nebraska. As for Virginia/Kentucky - are they supposed to be touching? I admit I haven't read Kentucky's page; I think most of it was written while I was not active. Benkarnell 22:40, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

I am sure that the borders of Kentucky and Virginia should be touching. Virginia has a chunk of eastern Knetucky, and southeastern Ohio. Both of which are alongside with Kentucky's territory in the area.

Supersonic91 18:57, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

The USSR needs another major edit. For some reasons, the USSR-territory does only include the utterly northern part of the Ural, although text and map of canon USSR-article clearly stated that it is part of it. It's even called the Ural territory. Additionaly, Aralia should be coloured red-ish to show its dependence after the recent war. Grand Prince Paul II. 07:50, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Wiki/Timeline/Article Technicals
Section archives: Page 1

Article of the Month: South America
Trying something new here, if it works we might stick with it. Anyway this month's article of the month is. While no one is required to work on this article, we do ask that you please take some time to add to this article and hopefully through a group effort we can turn this stub into a good article. Mitro 13:30, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Culture / Society
Archives: Page 1 • Page 2

British or New British
What should the demonym of the inhabitants of New Britain be. I've always thought of them as British but a look at the more recent edits from other people would make it appear that they are called New British. So what should it be? Bob 14:58, February 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * I would refer to them as British. They're the remnants of the British government, with the rightful british monarch. They're British.Oerwinde 16:36, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

I agree with Oerwinde. However, perhaps some people that would prefer equality and political-correctness might prefer "New British" so as to show that all races are equal in NB etc. Will a political analyst in say Skyros or Alexandreia use the term "New British", no. Will future social studies books call the demonym "New British", probably not. Mr.Xeight 17:53, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Miscellaneous discussion
Archives: Page 1

Empire of Greater Germania
Daeth to bigs brothers, GemrMania uber alles yalls, ANarhcy, Anaekcy, Oceansia sucks!

Haha, sorry but couldn't help myself. Anyway, do you remember this troll we had a few months back? I was wondering what you guys would think if I took his "proposal" and turned it into a science fiction book/series published in the Doomsday universe? Mitro 20:48, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

possibly the best idea involving the worst idea ever to come out of this. how about having a WW4 involving the USSR, the Empire, The CANZ and the SAC, with The ADC as well. and the NAU Could fight the "war of american unification", like OTL Prussia did. HAD 20:59, February 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Germany has to rule all of Europe, with pomp and circumstance and an iron fist. There also have to be secret military bases hidden under rubble or in out of the way places (like Siberia or Yellowstone National Park) with super-advanced technology, and cloning, so the Germans can repopulate the world quickly.BrianD 21:36, February 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yikes, I forgot about that conversation. A lot of you need lessons on how to Not Feed the Trolls. This guy was taking everyone for a ride, I think. Benkarnell 21:39, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

The first I thought was "Oh this guy's back, I never got to have my fun with him...". But as long as we're getting propaganda novels, I'd like to include a "Despotate of Byzantium" that pushed the Turks out of Anatolia, and into someplace bad... like Persia, and now rules an empire from Morocco to Iraq, Somalia to Bosnia to be included :D
 * I'm only half-joking too...

Mr.Xeight 00:03, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

as long as the french get bombed, i'll be happy! :)LOL!?!--HAD 16:02, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Nuclear Bomb Simulation
I came across this site today I don't know it's accuracy but it does give a rough idea of what would happen in the vicinity such as the pressure, the fallout and overall destruction. It may be useful to see just how bad the damage was. http://www.carloslabs.com/node/20 --GOPZACK 18:01, February 11, 2010 (UTC)


 * I've been using it for quite a while. I added it to the Externals(1983: Doomsday) page a while back, but I don't know how many people check it.Oerwinde 18:48, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Olympics??
According to International Olympic Committee (1983: Doomsday), the first postwar Games won't happen until 2012! I'd love to follow the Vancouver games with parallel ones in Zurich, but I don't think we'll get to do that for another two years. Benkarnell 05:18, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, I guess it says that Zurich's hosting a "limited" Games. Shall I start a page on it? I'm interested in which nineteen countries are competing. Probably the only smallish participants are from Europe, with the rest coming from S. America and the ANZC. (And probably none of the ANZ's satellite countries will be sending teams.) But it's still true that the Summer Games won't happen until 2012. That postponement was a fairly significant news cycle last year. Benkarnell 15:16, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I moved it back to '12 because I thought the traditional Olympic cycle would make more sense. That, and the Olympics would bump up against the World Cup...which does not happen in our timeline and would be a bigger issue in their timeline. I think the DD world would prefer that major sporting events happen in separate years. As far as the Winter Games, feel free to start that page (I'm tapped out...I have several other pages here to work on, not to mention life in general). I am establishing the IOC in TTL gearing up towards a full resumption - pomp and all - of the Winter Games in '12. You should probably work this part in from the IOC page, too: "The vote for the 2012 Winter Games is said to be held in February 2010, and the IOC is discussing moving the Winter Games to two years before/after the Summer Games." I would put the 2012 Winter Games in Siberia/USSR, and have the IOC vote on whether to keep the Winter Games in line with the Summer Games (same year), or have the Winter Games 2 years before/after the Summer Games (which would mean a 2014 Games; I would propose having the Nordic Union as a primary advocate for this, in part because it stands to benefit from having the 2014 Games in Norway and Sweden. BrianD 15:34, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

=CURRENT ARTICLE PROPOSALS= Please list any and all current article proposals and their discussion here. If the proposals only involves a specific section of the article, please state that. Also remember to use  when reviewing new articles.

Poland
I have an idea for a Polish survivor state with its capital in Wroclaw. is this a plauible idea? --HAD 14:43, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wroclaw is the 4th largest city of Poland, it might have been destroyed during Doomsday. Mitro 14:57, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Okay. if it were, are their more plausible alternatives for a polish survior state? --HAD 16:28, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well there is a Polish survivor state mention in the article. You should contact Oer about it if you want to expand on the idea more. Mitro 16:30, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Look for places that can feed themselves for the long-term. Some sort of natural defenses would also be a plus. So would an existing administrative structure like in a provincial capital, etc. Benkarnell 16:47, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

I was thinking making an article about Poland, it seems like the most likely area for a survivor region would be southern Poland. Riley.Konner 21:51, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

i was actually basing the Polish idea on the state mentioned in the Prussia article. will contact Oer.. HAD 18:02, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

LON Authority for Space Operations
To bring forward the issue of spaceflight (and in a larger frame more global themes in 1983: Doomsday) i propose the canonization of the LoN - Authority for Spatial Operations, situated in Kourou and established by the TSAR treaty in January 2009. Aiming at coordinating and supervising spacfaring and realted activities worldwide in the signing and ratifiying states.

A frame I worked out now, some details are needed (site for ANZC launch site... etc. I already tried to refer to what I found in other articles, but not sure if got everything. Harmonizing with League of Nations and other pages will be done if approved.

Thanks for your help and comments.--Xi&#39;Reney 19:01, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

Before Doomsday the US was a major force in Space exploration but with the US gome the only two countries that have the recourses ar the SSS and ANZC and theres another thing how are these governmants going to justify a space program when people in meny parts ofthe world have medievel living standerds --Owen1983 19:07, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * You know what Owen, this is one of the few times I have to agree with you. Space exploration in all likelihood will be a low priority even among the first world nations. Mitro 19:15, November 16, 2009 (UTC)


 * My intention is definitely not bringing any moon mission into DD. Any ambitious space program Would sound like Science fiction. I am mainly thinking about practical focus, e.g. satellite starts for reestablishing communications and/or meteorological/reconaissance purposes, maybe a GPS-like system in a timeframe roughly 2009...more economical than rebuilding vast terrestrial infrastructure once you get a functioning rocket system back to work. --Xi&#39;Reney 22:03, November 16, 2009 (UTC)


 * This is true, we take satellites so much for granted nowadays that we forget just how much the Space Race has benefited society. If you can just get a satellite up there, it is much easier to use it to communicate, instead of building miles and miles of land lines. nd then there are the public safety benefits that come from being able to see hurricanes and the like when they're still out in the middle of the ocean. Benkarnell 23:40, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * Satelites make sense, my concern though was for more ambitios space exploration designs I have been seeing pop up on certain articles. One proposal suggested that an American survivor state could make it back to the moon sometimes in the 2010s. Mitro 00:13, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * what happened to the satalites already orbiting? most of the communications on the ground would be gone, but would it be possible to rework the systems?Desert viking 18:16, January 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * Where is that page? Benkarnell 00:52, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * It was on the proposal, but Riley has removed it but has kept the space exploration which still seems unlikely IMO for such a nation. Mitro 03:11, November 17, 2009 (UTC)

I could see Virginia starting a space program. Considering what kind of nation Virginia is, the space prgram could have started as an unexpected side effect of missile research. --Yankovic270 03:21, November 17, 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, this is an old proposal but it's good that it waited so long. The Alaska paragraph can now be brought into line with what we now know about that conflict.... whatever that is. Benkarnell 19:03, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

New British elections
British elections coming up! Bob 20:23, November 18, 2009 (UTC)
 * See 2009 Realm of New Britain General Election (1983: Doomsday) for the article in question. Mitro 03:09, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't the Anglo-Africans just continue parties popular among them, such as the Progressive Federal Party, instead of copying British parties for no apparent reason? --Karsten&#160;vK (talk) 14:04, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * We've already noted that British people from the UK came to New Britain. Many of these people would have been politicians, with a collapsing government and civil disorder, when an existing stable party community arrives, it only makes sense that they would take root and stabilise political aggravations. Bob 13:09, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh sure, that make sense. It's the Anglo-Africans I'm talking about however. Why would they conform to a model identical to the one previously used in Britain and forget everything about their own political history? Especially given the fact that they form the majority of the population, that just doesn't make sense to me. Also, given the fact that South Africa used a system of proportional representation and I've never heard of any country that moved from a proportional system to a district system as rigid as the British one (correct me if I'm wrong on this though), my estimate is New Britain would definitely have more than just two to three political parties. You may even want to spice things up by adding an ethnic Xhosan party, openly supportive of KwaXhosa. --Karsten&#160;vK (talk) 14:38, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
 * The thing is I've put in alot of information into the table but it doesn't come up. Can anyone help? Bob 11:34, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

There would be a large Xhosa population, given NB's location. But Karsten, a couple things: South Africa's state collapsed and there was a lot of population displacement, so it's plausible that NB wouldn't resemble South Africa too closely. Though since most people would be used to a PR government, I would expect them to keep that. Benkarnell 18:23, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

I think kertens got a good point a political parties should reflect the ethnic diversity in NB --Owen1983 18:46, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

Hello? Bob 16:38, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think there would be an "Afrikaans National Party" in New Britain. The history suggests that most Afrikaaners were replaced by Anglo-Africans.  Mitro 02:59, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

This is another very, very old proposal. Bob, have you thought about Karsten's point about a PR system? Benkarnell 19:08, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

A PR system allows more parties more seats. This leads to weaker governments and less control. The government will spend more more time bickering than getting things done. This is precisely what New Britain doesn't need. Bob 17:54, January 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is that your own personal politics or what the people of NB decided? The British refugees come from a country with a long history of being under a PR system.  South Africa where NB is located, has one as well.  It seems implausible that these people would forget centuries of political history and try a whole new system.  Mitro 19:11, January 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually British elections have always been run on a first past the post system. Elections for the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly are run using a mix of first past the post and proportional representation. The Northern Ireland Assembly is elected using Single Transferable Vote. However none of those devolved assemblies existed in 1983 Verence71 12:54, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

Article created by Bob. Question: would the UK manage to evacuate 900k to southern Africa? Mitro 17:37, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

answer: they couldnt becuse it would be impossible a more realistic figure would be 200 max becuse with fual souces gone and there would nned space for machinary and crops--Owen1983 17:19, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

I just started with 900k to provoke debate. I agree that it should be smaller, but 200 is a gross underestimation. Your average British ship houses and provides for men in excess of 300. I think the bar should be set about 300k and we can discuss from there. Bob 16:36, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

200 would be about right due to food been rationed and coal or diesel needed to make the journey--Owen1983 13:11, December 28, 2009 (UTC)

Even if you can organise an exodus of about 200k brits to southern Africa (use cruiseliners etc. and it goes okey..) what would you do with the problems in te host nation?? food, shelter, public opinion, neigbour states reaction?? As far as imagine 200.000 of mainly white people of the "Empire" -though long gone- nearing the shore of southerm africa...a HUGE conflict potential IMO.--Xi&#39;Reney 00:32, January 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * I thought we had nixed the whole idea of a coordinated mass evacuation of Britain - a LONG time ago. My main problem: why, why, why, why would they just up and decide to go to South Africa? They had no idea that a pro-British state was taking shape down there! South Africa may have drawn some British refugees, but I personally have huge problems with the idea of a single Moses-style exodus to New Britain. Small numbers of refugees from Britain to SA would probably have landed first at the cape, but would have found their way to New Britain eventually given the anti-White climate in Cape Town. Bob, we have been over this endlessly, month after month after month. Please stop pushing for it. Benkarnell 19:26, January 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * I have altered it so its a few thousand. The government and supporting troop as well as bureaucrats and the like. The population of New Britain has increased as Brits from ANZC Celtic Alliance and other places flood into New Britain.
 * The numbers from other parts of the world would be small though. The CA and ANZC are major world powers with a large economies. Would that many people really prefer a small refugee state in chaotic Africa where most of the population is Xhosa or Anglo-African? Mitro 19:13, January 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe New Britain sets up a major operation to begin moving more people from mainland Britain who don't want to be a part of the Celtic Alliance, Clevelande/Northumberland/Albion, or Bentwater/Woodbridge. With a major waystation in Avalon, Guinea-Bisseau.Oerwinde 20:16, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

I suppose it would depend whether they thought Bentwaters/Woodbridge would be big enough to worry about Verence71 16:20, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * I question the whole operation, I mean, who would want to leave their home they've always known for some seemingly backwards African country that's got an identity crisis when they could have a more stable life where they've always lived. That's my thought. I wouldn't leave my home and move to the opposite ends of the Earth just because they promised to be the "same-old Britain".Louisiannan 22:45, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Because your home is now an even more backward and unhealthy place which offers you much less opportunities. New Britain is located in former South Africa, probably the most developed country in pre-DD Sub-Saharian Africa, barely a backward country. Even the Britons would know this fact. Grand Prince Paul II. 22:57, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

this is the basic idea for a survior society in china-- very open to suggesting at this point.
 * It's wickedly dystopian, along the lines of Thunder Bay and aspects of Superior's history - I like it. I don't know enough about Chinese history or culture to say whether it's a realistic Chinese dystopia, though. It also seems quite large - I'm wary of creating large survivor states in China before we nail down more of its history. Benkarnell 22:11, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

yea, the size kind of bothers me, though its sparcely populated--I think. I'm kind of hoping that this will start chineese history for this TL-- when I went through this site for the first time, the abscence of any information on China after DoomsDay stuck out like a sore thumb. As far as I can tell, China was suprise attacked by the USSR, which caused a total government breakdown. A coastal few towns seem to have survived, as they are mentioned in tiawan's article, but under the impression there is no larger (or at least better) civilization in the interior. Some stuff on the edges has been claimed by the USSR, but they have simply stayed away from going farther south into manchuia--implying it not worth it due to the state of things. China has a history of major Civil wars (all of the most deadly conflicts of the last two hundred years are european conflicts or chinese civil wars), and they have a history of war lords. As for Chinese culture, my idea is that the culture was in flux at that point, and Hong Long (the emperor) got rid of those who opposed it. but I do think it could be smaller are you thinking population (its at about a twentieth or less of what the area would be now) or land holdings?Desert viking 05:33, January 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * I guess the area: it seems like a really big chunk of China, especially for a monarchist revival like this. Given China's decades without a monarch, and the long ideological purge wrought by the Cultural Revolution, it seems like a would-be monarch would only be able to maintain control of a smaller group). But I'm not dead set against it, and it could work given enough justification. It's a revival of the warlordism of the 1930s, in a way. Did any of those warlords pretend to be "emperors"? What would they be most likely to call themselves in a post-Communist China ruin? Benkarnell 03:37, January 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * The warlord era, at least in the north was fought over who controlled the Beiyang Government. None of the warlords claimed to be Emperor but a lot of them called themselves or were called Marshal something. I would imagine that in a post-Doomsday China the warlords would call themselves Marshals and would all claim to be the legitimate government of the People's Republic Verence71 18:57, February 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's mostly what I was thinking. We've played with reviving monarchies in various places (Prussia, Luxembourg, New Britain, Orleans), and I've been guilty of it myself (Hawaii, Cocos Islands). But China seems an unlikely place for it to happen, what with the legacy of communism and its impact on the public consciousness. It's for the same reason that we haven't had any monarchies arise in the former USA (except Hawaii, where I honesly believe the restoration was justified, even likely). I like the idea of a Marshall running things in this region. And then I'd be more OK with a largish survivor state in Anhui. Benkarnell 03:15, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

All right, I've changed It to be slightly less monarchal--- it still has the feel, but it avoids the words. However, this means the name of the article would have to change, something I don't know how to do. Right now The best name I can come up with is the "Dragon Lands" which just doesn't sound right. The whole country could be refered to as the Dragon Army, or the article could be rewritten as a post-doomsday history of Anhui. does anyone have any ideas? (I don't really like any of mine so far) Desert viking 17:10, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Article I created. --Fero 18:26, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

East Tennessee
Article I created for the provisional nation of east Tennessee. --BrianD 15:53, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I like the way they informally drifted toward nationhood: no grand nation-building or even an official naming, just a "hard decision". That's how a lot of the survivor communities probably evolved. I admire your persistence! You started with a broad sketch of the entire region and haven't once stopped filling in the details. I have trouble doing that (that's why I've stuck to tiny islands and isthmuses). Benkarnell 00:05, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ben, thanks! That seems to be the best way for me to deal with all the articles; I come up with ideas from time to time, and this method helps me to be faithful to updating them. BrianD 00:18, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

May I ask editors to review the East Tennessee article, as well as New Montgomery, Selma, Louisiana, Lake Arthur and American Comics and tell me on their respective talk pages, what they believe needs to be worked on/completed for the pages to be considered complete and ready for approval? (I'm listing them all here, in lieu of sending six different messages for each one). I would greatly appreciate your input. BrianD 02:35, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Seems odd that Knoxville and Oak Ridge would not be targets. Why do you think they would be missed? Mitro 02:55, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Really, that's my mistake. When doing research (uh, Google) for the WCRB South page, I saw where Knoxville was listed as a teritary target, and reading the Wikipedia article on the city showed no military bases or government sites in the region. Of course, that meant that I totally overlooked Oak Ridge, which is not far from Knoxville; that one's on me. I suppose that a small-range yield wouldn't be out of order for the laboratory. BrianD 04:56, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Selma
My proposal on a survivor community in Selma, Alabama.BrianD 04:03, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Slavery was abolished in 1993... does that mean that Selmans(?) enslaved whites before that? Benkarnell 03:40, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, because the "CSA" was doing it to African-Americans. I'm still working on this idea, so while the idea of a black community (Selma) and white, racist Confederate community will stick, the details will change. There's a lot of anger there over things that happened in the first decade after Doomsday, but potential for Selma to eventually join the "greater community of nations" in the South. Not so much for New Montgomery, whose leaders are bound and determined to resurrect the Confederacy. BrianD 05:41, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Louisiana
My proposal for the known-only-until-now-to-locals state(s) of Louisiana.--BrianD 20:01, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

Natchez
My proposal for the survivor community of Natchez, Mississippi. Bonus points for the first editor to identify the real-life counterpart to Natchez's mayor.--BrianD 20:01, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

Nanchung
a resilient group of chinese who have built a nation around a leader in resonse to threats from the Dragon Kingdom.Desert viking 00:57, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

Parthenopean Republic
So,i've done a new article.For now it's only an idea.If the Second Sicily war gets approved,i think it's pretty much likely to exist.

My article about a small town in Illinois that survived Doomsday. Mitro 00:45, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Korea
Moved Discussion to: Talk:Korea (1983: Doomsday)

This is one of those general articles. Thoughts and comments welcomed. Mitro 02:56, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

Olmsted
My proposal for a theocratic dictatorship in former Minnesota. --Jnjaycpa 21:02, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

From the short stub, I have doubts that this would happen. However, this free ebook may give you a little insight into the megachurch that has developed out of the former "First Baptist Church there in Rochester, MN. A short history is found at the church's website with a link to a downloadable book.

I picked this church from the ten that google earth brought up because it had no denomination attached to it. It changed its name to Autumn Ridge Church. In order to have a viable "theocratic republic" you have to have a megachurch already established with a near fanatical following. We are trying to deal with the believable rather than the fanciful here. I doubt if a megachurch (especially Baptist) would become an "Old Testament" Church in the way your envision. You might get a "Reformed" Church (that believes in what we call Christian Reconstructionism ) that would set up such a republic, but such churches tend to be small.SouthWriter 00:31, January 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, stranger things have happened. But it's true that most USAmericans would hold on to at least some of the political ideals they were raised on, freedom of religion first among them. OTOH, a self-governing, autocratic religious community is not at all hard to imagine, especially in a post-apocalyptic world. People gather around a charismatic leader or organization, which slowly increases his/her/its degree of control. There doesn't even need to be an established church before 1983. However, a community of 25,000 seems a tad high for such a community... in a wide-open world like this, it would be fairly easy for the disaffected (i.e. anyone who did not buy into the regime's spiritual claims) to leave for another town. And it seems hard to believe this many people sticking around in a place like this. Then agiain, it is a very different world. I'm on the fence. Benkarnell 00:48, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

Point noted. I'll probably cut it down to about 10K. In my storyline, the Rochester government falls apart and a charismatic preacher joins with a National Guard unit takes over. The city was largly abandond and the people left and the survivors went to the countryside.--Jnjaycpa 01:24, January 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * OK. And I was thinking: if the settlement is prosperous and successful, or at least more so than its neighbors, it may well be fairly big. Some people may well put up with living there if it beats leaving. I was also thinking: I'm surprised we haven't seen more communities like this. Imagine after the collapse of civilization. People would come together to live with others who shared their religious views. Naturally they would govern themselves in a way that we might call a "theocracy". There wouldn't have to be antything insidious or sinister about it - it would just be people regulating their own religious community. The American frontier was filled with settlements like that. If it's a small community where everyone basically holds the same beliefs, it doesn't have to degenerate into an oppressive dicatorship. Problems will only start to arise when the younger generation grows up, and they question the norms and beliefs of the foundrs. Benkarnell 23:22, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

I decided to change the name to Christian Republic of Olmsted. --Jnjaycpa 05:50, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

International Falls
My proposal for a survivor community along the U.S.-Canada border in former Minnesota (I had hinted at it in a couple of other places on the Wiki). BrianD 22:09, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

An article based upon the survivor community mentioned in the 2009 WCRB report on the southern United States. --GOPZACK 22:14, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Karelia
A proposal for a survivor nation in the former USSR. --Jnjaycpa 05:11, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Territorially speaking is it based around this part of Russia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Karelia?? Verence71 20:23, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Yes. I assume that in a large region between the killzones of Leningrad and Murmansk there would be some survivors. The only question I have is if there are any potential targets in that region.Jnjaycpa 20:48, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

This link might help http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leningrad_Military_District Verence71 21:00, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. After a little research I found that there was a minor military airbase in Petrozavodsk, which means it was nuked. For the moment, I'll assume no other nukes fell in that region.Jnjaycpa 01:04, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

70% or so of the population of Karelia is ethnic Russian so surely Russian would be the main language??

Ethnic Karelians themselves are about 10% of the population so maybe at some point post-Doomsday there could be an armed uprising among them Verence71 16:02, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

I decided to split Karelia into two parts: a Finnish-dominated democratic republic (Republic of Karelia) and a pro-Siberian regime (East Karelia).

According to this scneario, Soviet and Finnish Karelian forces fought in the winter of 1983 (Second Winter War). By spring of 1984, the Finnish Karelians reclaimed most of the territory lost in 1940. In 1988, the Finnish Karelians decide against rejoining Finland, and declare an independent nation, the Republic of Karelia (Karelia). The Soviets retreated and set up the Provisional Soviet Socalist Republic of Russia (East Karelia). By 2010, Karelia will formally join in the Nordic Union, while East Karelia will declare its alligence to Siberia.

Jnjaycpa 02:33, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

I've started a proposal for Soviet Karlia. Jnjaycpa 06:10, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Mexico
My expansion on the already canonized portions of the article on Mexico (aka United Mexican States). I want to keep what has been approved as canon; my proposals would expand on the history of the nation, as well as its culture, government, military, politics, and the influence of American refugees in the nation. --BrianD 18:31, February 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * You might want to talk to JorgeGG. He had some ideas regarding Mexico: User blog:JorgeGG/Mexico (Doomsday:1983) - Some ideas for refactoring.  Mitro 23:52, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Article created by Bob. Mitro 20:58, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Article created by Yank/Super. Mitro 20:58, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

I created an infobox for the article to get the ball rolling.

Supersonic91 19:57, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

I started writing this as a companion to the Panama Canal Zone page. My main goal is to show that the Panamanians aren't just helpless victims, but did get around to organizing themselves in several places. I plan on making the political situation as complicated as I can. Simple political solutions have been tried and failed in west Panama, like so many turbulent regions in OTL. Benkarnell 17:43, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Tiny state in Lincolnshire. Claims to be the legitimate successor to the UK. Bob 17:34, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

=FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES= Archive 1

''This subsection is placed to focus on things covering decisive, vital issues concerning the consistency of 1983: Doomsday as a whole and the Timeline specifically. PLease treat this section with the necessary respect and place things not belonging here below !! Comments of non-registered users will not be tolerated in this Talk section! This TL is not without flaws, and especially in the first time (me myself) a lot of things were inserted out of curiosity or not spending much time on repercussions. And due to the complexity level we have reached with 1983: Doomsday now each of these flaws might have world-spanning consequences... I will focus on identifying and eliminating those flaws/inconsistencies to strengthen the basis of the TL and prevent repercussions on the excellent contents written at all fronts. This of course in the established manner of consensus and discussions! I bring this up as a consequence of the "Canal discussion" further below with the intention keeping an eye on above mentioned things.'' Objections? --Xi&#39;Reney 22:14, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

The Panama Canal again
I've gone ahead and written up a very long proposal for the Panama Canal. It was a pretty big undertaking (took me a couple of days), because it brings together some major events in the history of South America, Australia-New Zealand, the USSR, even France. It mostly drew on Lahbas' ideas: XiReney and I both argued for a different course, but Lahbas was so damn convincing... This hopefully won't contradict a whole lot of canon material. Darien and Costa Rica, yes, but I wrote those pages and am willing to change them if this gets accepted. The biggest change is that the USS Benjamin Franklin sailed around Cape Horn instead of through the Canal... that may push some things back by a couple of months but otherwise should leave the timeline intact. Read and comment please (please!). Benkarnell 05:44, January 31, 2010 (UTC)