Alternative History:Request for user rights

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF (user rights). Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only one administrator for every 1000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time a new one is needed or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

IMPORTANT: only registered users with 200 or more edits and at least two months on this wiki will be allowed to vote in the user nominations or to nominate candidates.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, as long as they accept the nomination first.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.
 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail or been blocked in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

SkyGreen24
He's a very nice and kind person, in general, and knows what's right and what's wrong. He's an extremely levelheaded person, and can help sort out arguments. He always follows through, from what I've seen, and is always drawn to push forward with his projects. I believe that he would be a good choice to be a Constable, because he'll be a fair manager of the chat and the wiki in general. Upvoteanthology ( Talk | Sandbox ), 04:09, January 6, 2015 (UTC)


 * Supporters
 * .....  Because I'm Just... Too... SSSWWWEEEEEETTT!!!
 * Upvote you beat me to it Toby2 My Lazy Sig
 * Roman-spqr-flag.png Consul Ioshua  (Talk) SPQR_EMBLEM.jpg

15:45, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * FOR THE GLORY OF THE PARTY!
 * Saturn120 (Talk/Blog) 13:15, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * QuebecanCanada (talk) 13:29, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Prinsenvlag.svg Hail Sean! (Tech can into talkpage?)
 * "This is not your grave  but you are welcome in it. " 18:10, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Crim de la Crème 20:24, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Cookiedamage (talk) 20:36, January 6, 2015 (UTC) sky mod for all time. all praise sky tyranny
 * 21:06, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Spartian300
 * Flag of the Hurian Federation.png Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 21:35, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * -Lx (leave me a message)Azarath Flag.png 21:36, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Dang... hadn't seen this before. 00:12, January 16, 2015 (UTC)
 * 11:09, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:1.png|23px]] Imp (Say Hi?!) 14:36, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * This is Edge, He is a cool guy when he isn't too lazy to sign his real sig. Hit him up. 19:11, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Fed (talk) 20:37, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Regards, Laptop Zombie 04:13, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Sky, I am late. I just noticed your nomination today. FirstStooge (talk) 08:26, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Objectors
 * Sorry, Sky, I am late. I just noticed your nomination today. FirstStooge (talk) 08:26, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Objectors


 * Discussion
 * Sky, make sure you write why you want to be a constable. Vinland Flag.jpg Upvoteanthology ( Talk | Sandbox )

15:51, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * First of all, I'd like to thank Upvote for the nomination. As to why I would want to be a constable, I guess I did contribute a lot to the wiki in the year and a some months I've been here, I believe I have shown some anti-vandalism work. I might not be as timeline-active compared to other users, but I do think that I am able to settle arguments, hear out both sides of an argument and, a trait some users lack, admit when I'm wrong. Also, although the rollback ability does not make much of a difference, I think I could make the best of it. Cheers, Sky Green 24 ( P , Q ) 10:55, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Can't vote for a nomination you make. Lordganon (talk) 12:09, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * I want Sky to get user rights as well. He deserves them. It would be nice to have someone around more often to make sure me and Scar/Ace etc, don't get in a flame war. Spartian300 (talk) 12:16, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, you can prevent that youselves lol. Saturn120 (Talk/Blog) 13:15, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * But you aren't there most o the time. spar
 * One of the main reasons I voted for Sky is because he is on chat a lot and thus can be very useful as a constable and would make for even more mod presence in chat. He could effectively prevent shitstorms early Prinsenvlag.svg Hail Sean! (Tech can into talkpage?)
 * I think he'll be a fine constable, as long as you don't suggest that Serbs are better than Croats. But other than that, he's fine. "This is not your grave  but you are welcome in it. " 18:10, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * I promise I won't, haha. Sky Green <font color="DFB73D">24 <font color="DC143C">( <font color="0B4EA2">P <font color="EE1C25">, <font color="FFCC00">Q <font color="DC2624">) 20:11, January 6, 2015 (UTC)

Mscoree
Ms is one of the wiki's most active users and best writers. He is always willing to help and contribute, and has now become an active part in many timelines. Although he got off to a rocky start when he first joined, he has since become much more mature and cooperative. He seems to get along nicely with everyone, and has spent a lot of time working to fight vandalism, spam, and other matters. For that reason I think he should be constable. Not to mention he really should be by now; he lost 5 - 33 in his last vote, and all he needed was 5 - 34 (not to mention Fed said he was going to vote yes, but arrived about an hour late). QuebecanCanada (talk) 00:20, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Supporters
 * Tr0llis (talk) 00:21, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Toby (Its Toby)
 * RazorFangZ14
 * —Bfoxius (talk)
 * Prinsenvlag.svg <font color="Navy">Hail Sean! (Tech can into talkpage?)
 * RazorFangZ14
 * —Bfoxius (talk)
 * Prinsenvlag.svg <font color="Navy">Hail Sean! (Tech can into talkpage?)


 * Shikata ga nai! 18:19, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Flag of Romania.svgToţi în unu; Nihil Sine DeoFlag of Romania.svg
 * Ratcolor (talk) 18:50, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yank 20:00, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Hurian Federation.png Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 20:50, January 18, 2015 (UTC) He's done his best for the community, been helpful and resourceful. I may have some personal issues with his actions in the past, but I don't see how Ms outside of my own feelings that is a problem for the wiki. I say he done good.
 * .....  Because Mscoree is... Just... Too... SSSWWWEEEEEETTT!!!
 * Fritzmet (talk) 19:06, January 19, 2015 (UTC)
 * Octivian Marius
 * Objectors
 * No way in hell. Hasn't changed a bit. Lordganon (talk) 10:24, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:1.png|23px]] Imp (Say Hi?!) 14:33, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * NFSreloaded (talk) 15:28, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Nope. Still does the same old Antic
 * After thinking for a bit, I am still going to say no for Ms' nomination Saturn120 (Talk/Blog) 18:53, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Definitely not. Fed (talk) 20:37, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * I could write a novel on the reasons Ms doesn't deserve this position. Crim de la Crème 00:38, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Not too sure I should comment. -- 03:36, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Nay. FirstStooge (talk) 08:26, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Mitro (talk) 17:09, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry Ms. After giving it some serious thought, what has happened seems to keep happening. I think you're a valuable contributor, but I fear giving you any power. Cour *talk* 22:47, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yesterday I thought yes. But what I saw today is enough to reverse my decision. Regards, Laptop Zombie 05:44, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Discussion
 * @all admins ​Don't revet the descriptioon tr0llis made, i couldn't write all of it so i asked him
 * If there is a single Wikian who deserves to be constable (arguably even Lt, in my opinion), it is Ms. Now, I know I have been harsh on him a lot of the time. But lately, I have seen just the transformation he has undergone. I have realized just how kind and helpful a person he can be. I have been so rude to Ms so often, but the next day, he jumps right back in and offers to help me. And then there are his contributions. He has almost 40k edits, and these are not just boring small additions. He has been extremely active in the community, with active roles in 83:DD, 36:YS, KF, and had been a good mod for PM3. Then, there is NotLAH, which was one of the greatest map games of all time. His Stirling record is surpassed by very few individuals, and his character is out of this world. I understand that many people may be tempted to object, but I urge you to get to know him before you do so. Can he be dramatic? Sure, but he is overall less dramatic than a number of other users. We all have our ups and downs. To become a constable, you need more ups than downs, and Ms has fulfilled this role. I hope, for the sake of this wiki, that Ms gets Constable. Signed, The Leading Anti-Mscovite, 01:06, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ms, you still need to accept the nomination. 14:58, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * As I've said before, Mscoree is one of the only users on this wiki who was helpful and welcoming when I first joined the wiki. He councils me on my timeline, and he appears to be active on many others. I can't think of anyone else who would be more deserving of some sort of admin position, based on his level of activity, edit count, and number of projects. I don't know what sort of disagreement he has with some of these users, but what ever it is I hope they can bury the hatchet and move on, for the sake of this wiki. Ratcolor (talk) 18:50, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Unsurprisingly, Ms and his friends have sucessfully trolled chat into oblivion and got a 2 hour block until they can calm down. Crim de la Crème 01:51, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Doesnt that make him ineligible?
 * "Bye. Enjoy your nomination" - Crim Harvenard2 (talk) 02:39, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * The requirements state 'blocked', not chat banned, which means he's still eligible. I think... <font color="1C4081">Sky <font color="D61517">Green <font color="DFB73D">24 <font color="DC143C">( <font color="0B4EA2">P <font color="EE1C25">, <font color="FFCC00">Q <font color="DC2624">) 16:46, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * I've removed my vote. One of the main reasons I voted yes was because it seems Ms has changed and become less disruptive and troll-ish. And then last night, tr0llis and all of them caused a huge disruption in chat and gotten themselves banned. I also remember when Ms essentially attempted to cheat in the Spanish-Austrian war in PM3, so that also propelled me to remove my vote. Anyways, I think Ms is a good community member and I'm grateful for the things he's done, but clearly he continues to allow his friends to cause crap on chat and tick everyone off. Cookiedamage (talk) 20:42, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Congratulations Crim, your set up is succeeding. I guess it's coincidental that this event happened during Mscoree's election, with the only witnesses being the people opposed to him in said election. Read the complete chat log, as you can see Mscoree essentially did not do anything. When he spoke it was mostly to tell people to calm down. Meanwhile Feud uttered several personal attacks and curses at Mscoree, Tr0llis, etc, and all Fed (the admin) did was "^". Then you wonder why Tr0llis said some things back. Strangely Mscoree is the one who is punished, along with all of them. Let's review how that happened. Crim joined chat and after only a few seconds, without even hearing what had happened, banned Ms, Tr0llis, Harv, etc. Monster Pumpkin, an admin even said it seemed like Mscoree did nothing wrong. In the chat logs themselves Tr0llis is called mature, and Mscoree is said to be the one lessening tensions, not escalating. Later I joined chat, having read the chat logs, and when I asked about it I too was immediately banned. Crim then proceeded to plaster a heavily exaggerated story on here for the sole purpose of embarrassing Ms and destroying his election. Heavily bias and inappropriate, in my opinion it undermines the entire office of admin. The sad thing is it works, and no one can stop you. Fritzmet (talk) 00:41, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * ^That type of aggressive, ganging behaviour is what made me vote against Ms, fyi. Fed (talk) 03:02, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * So one person talking is ganging? Not to mention I am seemingly in opposition by multiple people. Also how does my actions affect Mscoree? Do you usually vote on people depending on what people around him or her do to you? Fritzmet (talk) 03:38, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Why is no one taking heed of this? I was banned for "cursing" even though the log shows I never cursed at all. Feud cursed an excess of a dozen times, for comparison. Not that Crim would know, since he banned me without even listening to what I had to say after about five seconds on chat. Note I wasn't there for the last part of this event, I left chat and joined back some thirty minutes later, said hello, and was banned. As for banning Ms it seems like Crim claims that three/four people other than Feud immediately asked him to, but he seems to keep switching his story, and no one knows who these people are. Strange, because at least six people were asking for Feud to be banned. Tr0llis (talk) 13:46, January 25, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to comment on the argument, since I missed most of it, but I must say the following: Mscoree is too often associated with his "cronies". Their mistakes (if they do in fact make any) should not be and aren't a reflection of Mscoree himself, yet they are treated as such. Although I do understand that Ms does make mistakes and did make quite a few in the past, other people's mistakes shouldn't have anything to do with him. SkyGreen24 16:55, January 25, 2015 (UTC)

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, a long as they accept the nomination.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Rules

 * Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.
 * They are a Lieutenant.
 * They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for nomination to be accepted.
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Impeachment
It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

 * User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
 * If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment.
 * Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
 * Registered users' votes must have two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons
There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:
 * They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
 * They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
 * They have have not been fair, restrained, and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
 * They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

Note: One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.

Current Impeachments
===Name of TSPTF member===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.