Alternative History:Request for user rights

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF (user rights). Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only one administrator for every 1000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time a new one is needed or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

IMPORTANT: only registered users with 200 or more edits and at least two months on this wiki will be allowed to vote in the user nominations or to nominate candidates.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, as long as they accept the nomination first.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.
 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail or been blocked in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Mscoree
For as long as I can remember, Mscoree has been a strong and helpful contributer of the wiki, however he may have made flaws in the past, but then again who hasnt. He is helpful, determined, and currently one of the most impartial and helpful mods on PM3. Not only that but he has written several timelines, some of them in great detail. In short he is a respected and well deserving member of the wiki, and I think we should respect him as such. -Sims


 * Supporters
 * ​ Sims -The Rainbow Machete Piq 28524 400x400.png   14:51, February 13, 2014 (UTC)


 * Objectors

Ms was both banned and had a nomination fail in the last six months. He is not elegible for election. Fed (talk) 14:50, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * Discussion

Since when has a ban in the past mattered. It was a long time ago. -Sims

... It was less than a month ago, and it's in the requirements. Fed (talk) 14:52, February 13, 2014 (UTC)

LG added that requirement specifically to go against Mscoree, as well as him almost winning election except for one vote coming in late. I was unaware of the election, and i would like to vote. -Sims

No matter why the rule is there, it's still the rule. Fed (talk) 14:58, February 13, 2014 (UTC)

Its a rule imposed by LG so Mscoree will have no power when they get into arguments. In the last electin, Mscoree had 33 votes to 5 no. 33 TO 5. One vote coming in late shouldnt of even mattered, when the people support you that much, it was nearly 7 to 1 votes in favor. That should have resulted in his election -Sims

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, a long as they accept the nomination.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

CrimsonAssassin
I'm actually surprised we haven't made him one yet. Crim is super-helpful, and has his own TL- the quite well done Magnum Europae. I look forward to reading more. He exercises his power as Constable well, and has helped out around the wiki a LOT. Also, he's one of the most senior- agewise- members of this wiki, having joined before several of our other El Tees. For these reasons, I would like to nominate him for this promotion to El Tee. He deserves it, and since we have 15 open spots, haha.... 01:41, January 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * Supporters
 * I don't know why this hasn't been done already.
 * Cour (talk) 02:45, January 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * "This is not your grave  but you are welcome in it. " 03:48, January 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * FirstStooge (talk) 04:50, January 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * I couldn't agree with Scraw more, 22:53, January 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * Local Mafia Boss (Talk) (Blog)
 * This is UglyTurtle, Signing off. 23:22, January 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:1.png|23px]] Imp (Say Hi?!) 21:02, February 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * Fed (talk) 17:40, February 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * Mscoree (talk) 23:14, February 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Katholico (talk) 01:18, February 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Objectors
 * Discussion
 * Thank you very much, Guns. I am extremely greatful that you believe that I deserve such a role! I happily accept this nomination. I look forward to serving this wiki as an Lt. From cleaning up the wiki to resolving conflicts, I will use my best judgement to help the wiki in whatever way I can in the most neutral way I can. Banner_of_the_Holy_Roman_Emperor_with_haloes_(1400-1806).svg Labarum.jpg CrimsonAssassin- I have special eyes 04:37, January 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * Crim really has been one of the jolliest members of the wiki, and it is good knowing he likes to fight off trolls and report them to the TSPTF too. As such I feel he is ready for the position and he will do some great work as Lt. [[Image:1.png|23px]] Imp (Say Hi?!) 21:02, February 1, 2014 (UTC)

Rules

 * Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.
 * They are a Lieutenant.
 * They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for nomination to be accepted.
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Impeachment
It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

 * User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
 * If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment.
 * Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
 * Registered users' votes must have two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons
There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:
 * They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
 * They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
 * They have have not been fair, restrained, and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
 * They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

Note: One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.

Current Impeachments
===Name of TSPTF member===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.