User talk:I am that guy

Japan in your timeline
i like what your doing with your timeline it has alot of potentia, but i wanted to give a small reminder, the jaapanese were allies of the british in ww1 so it would probably be a greater war in the pacific not just the russians and americans, the japanese would mostlikely be the ameican's greatest concern. Nkbeeching (talk) 09:50, October 28, 2013 (UTC)

I am going to have the Japanese come in either in late 1915 or early 1916. I realize that I should've included them from the beginning. Thank you for the suggestion. I am that guy

YS1936
The New German Empire would not be under Goring. Ever. Himmler or Hess. Likely Himmler, also, they wouldn't last long before the Wehrmacht rebelled, likely under Rommel. Mafia CBA doing his signature. Don't judge Him. This Sig is inspired by Guns. 16:47, November 9, 2013 (UTC)

I was thinking that the Wehrmacht abandoned the north with the nazi government. I would imagine that in the initial months and years, wars would be uncommon as the survivor states tried to establish themselves.

Guy

Germany
By now you have seen the message Ms left. Basically, we hope you and PESTICIDE can work together to create the new Germany page. Just make sure to keep in line with canon. Thank you! :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 11:00, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

Pittsburgh (YS: 1936)
Do u want to make it a semi autonomous city? Independent except for taxes, foreign affairs, and military? U can have a militia. Daeseunglim (talk) 00:13, November 13, 2013 (UTC)

What did u want to make there? I am open to ideas as may let u as I have a steel producer already. Daeseunglim (talk) 00:37, November 13, 2013 (UTC)

HRE ASB
Esteemed contributor to the Yellowstone TL, I object to the HRE on a number of counts of ASBness.

Please, consider my arguments made here. The entire idea of a united Russia in this TL at the time when it happens is ASB, and I hope you join me in striking it down as obsolete by signing the petition.

Thank You,                 Hasta la vista,   baby.  08:12, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Compensation
Hey Iam. I know that you haven't bee lucky with all the states making, so I wanted to ask you if you would be comfortable in making the nation of Ukraine for the timeline? The nation will definately exist so there is no question about the violation of canon. You might also want to have a look at the talkpage of the Holy Russian Empire to have a look at the map and stuff. Thoughts? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 20:33, November 16, 2013 (UTC)

No problem, although I hope you leave me to do the flag. ;)  Imp (Say Hi?!) 21:17, November 16, 2013 (UTC)

Just a couple more points. The nation will initally be a "People's Republic" before it ends up becoming a republic. And we haven't decided when the Russian Forum will form so if you could just not add anything about that on your article that would be great too. Thanks! :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 23:42, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Here:



You can see Ukraine as the state taking up most of OTL Western Ukraine. :)  Imp (Say Hi?!) 22:40, November 18, 2013 (UTC)

Well, stuff like Paint work. I will keep my promise and make that flag - what would you like in it? Right now I am thinking OTL Ukraine flag but instead of the Yellow, it would be orange and contain either the Hammer + Sickle and Star or just the Star.

Thoughts? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 19:38, November 21, 2013 (UTC)

Hey Iam! The flag as I promised:



So what do you think about the flag. So you like it? It is based on the OTL Ukraine flag as well as the SSR flag for Ukraine. I hoped to create something good out of them two. Thoughts? :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 00:13, November 24, 2013 (UTC)

No problem. It does admittedly look quite nice. :D  Imp (Say Hi?!) 01:41, November 24, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Map Program
Glad to hear you like them, and I'm more than happy to answer your question. I use Inkscape (a vector graphic program) for all my maps. I was also recently introduced to a new program called G.Projector, which allows you to turn homemade maps into any map projection. In short, I used Inkscape to outline the surface of Venus, than I used G.Projector to turn that into an orthographic projection. Than I went back to Inkscape and turned that orthographic map into a vector file.

Hope this helps you out. -- 02:36, January 15, 2014 (UTC)

Road to War
i apologizde but you do not meet the minimum to join Road to War

i do quite like your timeline but you have not been on for 7 months and you have less then 1000 edits. ill let you join later on since i believe you will be a good adition but for now i cant ill reserve the ottomans however.

the main reason is i want to avoid people joining who are implausible and if they see that someone not meeting the requirements join theyll also join once more i do apologize for now i will allow you to join later. Nkbeeching (talk) 16:12, January 23, 2014 (UTC)

again no worries and i do apologize again ill reserve the ottomans for you and allow you to join once thew game starts but for now im trying to disuade the implausibles from joining i do apologize once more. Nkbeeching (talk) 16:16, January 23, 2014 (UTC)

PM3: Call to War
Seeming as the Austrians have finally decided to find a way to attack, it is time to crush them.

I need you and all your vassals to join the war full on so we can crush Austria.

Anything you want in return just ask of me and I shall make it my job to grant your request.

Also don't be threatened or bribed by Austria, they told three different nations (probably more) that they'd get all of Italy by working with them so they can't and won't fulfil any of their promises. As for threats, once we've dealt with them now they won't be a threat, we'll win and we already are winning.

Thanks for all help.

Talk on my page or on chat for more info. Kunarian TALK 10:24, February 13, 2014 (UTC)

Glad of it. Thank you my friend. Kunarian TALK 16:14, February 13, 2014 (UTC)

The mods were split half and half. Therefor i do have claim to his land. He can suck it up. He wouldnt negotiate, so im punishing him. -Nova 11:54, February 20, 2014 (UTC)

Tibet
Check my 1420 and let me know what you think. I wish chat was working Jbwncster (talk) 04:03, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

steam age
I can't get to the steam age page after you edited it  Jbwncster   (Talk)   06:28, February 25, 2014 (UTC)

next turn starts when mods post events  Jbwncster   (Talk)

Can you respond to my turn for 1854? Also check the talk page for information on the company I am setting up.      Jbwncster (Talk)

Medieval Age :AOK
The game has started, please post as soon as you can and i hope you enjoy the game and wish you good luck.

Lippe
Hello, I am sure you know me, but I am the Hesse player for PM3 and I want to make a deal regarding Lippe. I noticed that you said Lippe was a vassal of yours, but I am trying to vassalize Lippe so I can get land that is closer to the nation of Bruchhausen, so I could get Bremen, which would open me up to the sea. I just want to know if we could make a deal about this. P.S. Mscoree sent me. Blocky858 (talk) 20:36, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

World Power
The game has restarted and the world is in ruins, please move as it would help the world get back on its feet. Saturn120  18:39, March 23, 2014 (UTC)

Battle Plans
I've drawn out my armies and their directions, along with major cities in Bremen Blocky858 (talk) 21:49, March 13, 2014 (UTC)

You seem like a good writer
Hey IATG, I was wondering if you would like to help me with my timeline | Hitler The Artist I need a good plausible writer that knows about the 20th century to help with the timeline. Saturn120  20:10, March 30, 2014 (UTC)

Dreadnought is spelled with an "o")
Actually, it can be spelled with an "a" also.

EoGuy (talk) 02:48, April 3, 2014 (UTC)

dreadnaught vs dreadnought
14 to 90

EoGuy (talk)

Template Help
I can do my best to help. I've played with your template a little and am a little confused myself. I can either create a template for you based on one of my own if you'd like. They look almost identical to the one you're using.Central Victory Creator 17:40, April 15, 2014 (UTC)

Look Out, Sir! Revised (Map_Game)
http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Look_Out,_Sir!_Revised_(Map_Game)#Map has started, a move is required by Russia. Whipsnade (talk) 12:18, April 18, 2014 (UTC)

^ move please

Oh there's also a treaty you need to sign (or not) The Treaty of Sochi (Look Out, Sir! Revised Map Game

Hamburgs african exploration
As you said you have been mapping and exploring africas coast since the games outset. I have as well and have a much better position than you INCLUDING resupply points, settlements on islands, and multiple trading outposts throughout Oyo, Kongo to name a few locations and i JUST rounded the cape of good hope a few years ago. The only nation close to that area of south africa currently is Portugal or possibly the netherlands. As for your comment how it would be implausible for you to not reach it that is false. When you have 0 major resupply points (trade posts dont count they can in no way support exploration fleets) or at least any that can get you as far down as south africa that makes it HIGHLY implausible for you to reach south africa barely years after Castile and before Portugal the two foremost naval explorers right now. To reach south africa you would have to be resupplying in the Kongo with current ships and tech levels. Considering the Kongo is open only to a certain power that rules out you being able to reach the Cape of good hope. much less even Gabon. Ive told you about this before, do not push boundaries you cannot have plausibly pushed yet.

According to Callum who is my senior, hes in agreement that reaching South Africa much less establishing an outpost there is out of your range but you would have just reached areas just around Angola which means your in the northern area of my Kongo vassal.

Ill Also have you know you have to ask me to be using my Trade posts and ports, you cant just waltz in and say you resupply there when you never asked me. That doesnt happen sorry

For the Record i dont even let my allies use Castilian trading posts and areas. The only exception might be the Kongo when the time comes in like 50 years but i dont let anyone so its not just you im not allowing its a universal thing there is a pretty big reason why im the furthest down and why i can continue to do that.

State Maps
Hello,

I just saw your message. I'm sorry to disappoint you that I did not make that map. It is modified. I also didn't make "A Federation of Equals". That was made by theAhawk. 99KingHigh and I merely keep the Wikia pages for it tidy.

Now, regarding the maps, "A Federation of Equals" is an interactive AAR (After-Action Report) based off the game Victoria 2, made by Paradox Interactive. We basically play the politicians within the country while theAhawk, the man who created it, plays the game and adjusts it to whatever action us players have done, hence it being interactive. So, we use the province map of the game Victoria 2, or more accurately, a version of the province map that has been modified so that it made be used for the purposes I'm using it right now.

So, I cannot help you, I sincerely apologize. Also, thank you for enjoying "A Federation of Equals" and I hope you continue enjoying it.

Damian0358 (talk) 01:32, April 23, 2014 (UTC)

Hello again,

I use either regular MS Paint or Paint.net to modify the province maps. For the state maps, I use a zoomed in version of the Vic2 province map, link here. I can't recall where I got this zoomed in version however.

What I did was first (using Paint.NET) use the Rectangle Select and select the country that I want, in this case, the Danubian Federation. I would then paste it into a new image and slowly get rid of the countries around the Federation. This has left me with the Federation being the only country in the image. Then, following what the maker of the AAR tells me, I would then slowly color in the province borders so that it looks like a state map, like so.

Now, for the state maps used in the state articles, I based them off of the maps used for the States of Germany on Wikipedia, like here and here. I used the colors used in these maps and slowly modify my map to look something like that. That would result in this and this.

And then we have the country maps used in the country articles, like the one for the Danubian Federation. For those maps, I use the zoomed in map I showed earlier and modified it to look the country maps on Wikipedia, like this. Doing that resulted in this.

Now, I don't know how helpful this is to you, but if you need further explaining, just ask.

Damian0358 (talk) 02:27, April 24, 2014 (UTC)

Road to war
http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/The_Road_to_War_(Map_Game) has started.90.244.91.158 22:53, April 24, 2014 (UTC)

http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Die_Achse_und_Verbündete_(Map_Game)
I'd love you to join

Warning
All right, had enough of this. I've told you it is biased, as have others. So it gets the tag. Don't remove it again. Lordganon (talk) 11:48, April 28, 2014 (UTC)

Final warning. Lordganon (talk) 01:54, May 5, 2014 (UTC)

Second one is really not a PoD, and the first makes the concept worse - the way A-H functioned more or less makes than entirely impossible. Lordganon (talk) 09:17, May 14, 2014 (UTC)

See no point in talking to someone who doesn't want to listen, especially in an environment like that.

For suggestions, see previous posts. I said a lot more, imo, than the thing that pissed you off. Several of the others in those blog comments also had good suggestions.

For the reforms, A-H basically already had them in place. The elements that they had not implemented were for practical reasons - AH, given the state it was, simply could not implement them. You've looked into this enough to know what those reasons are.

Those reforms, really, do nothing to address the poor quality of the military. And that timeframe is without question too short for such reforms anyway.

Lordganon (talk) 11:49, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

Made my case before. Not my fault you don't care for it.

What's wrong with that environment? It's about the equivalent of asking me to sit on a stage, get tied up, and handing out rotten fruit to a surrounding crowd with the purpose of throwing it at me.

Lordganon (talk) 12:31, May 16, 2014 (UTC)

The Prussians instituted those "reforms," or at least the basis for them, by the 1700s. And they took decades to take effect in what was then a tiny state. When the other German states did the same reforms, took them just as long, and they not only didn't go as far, but were far, far, less effective. Without the society that they formed in, these "reforms" are far less effective.

Such "reforms" would inflame the Hungarians and the minorities, and undo a lot of what had been done to try and keep things peaceful in that regard.

You're actually wrong about the military matters. Financial and overall control of the military fell to the joint government. Each section of the country, of course, had its own troops, under two very different structures of operation. This whole setup led to government deadlock only a few years before WWI, even, one of many such occurrences between the two halves.

With A-H, it's basically impossible to have such a concept - not that it would even remotely work in A-H anyway - pass through the government. Never going to happen.

And, as noted, decades to see any impact. Following the resulting civil war and collapse, of course.

Lordganon (talk) 13:16, May 20, 2014 (UTC)

Because the Hungarians would lose control if the military was reformed. That was quite possibly the biggest thing for them - they openly threatened to leave or revolt if any loss of control seemed possible. Including over minorities in "their" territory.

Minorities would hate it because it would be, in effect, a move to institute authority over them. Which they did not want. Such a relations campaign - which would not exist, given the time period - would just be laughed at.

Actually easier to institute the reforms in the 1700s. Things were less complex. Technology doesn't always help.

The Germans help? Nope. And for each state, the reforms would be, and have to be, different.

Lordganon (talk) 15:53, May 22, 2014 (UTC)

Never used the words "curb-stomped" or anything of that nature. Nor did I say that it would be easy for Italy to win. But, win they would.

Yes, I have read what you've said - but you ignore so much. The others, there is no consensus, though the majority seem to agree on the tag, though not for the same reasons, even among themselves.

Those "sources" don't actually indicate that. The numbers are a smokescreen, and the idea that they had any edge in quality is outright false.

As noted before, the number of divisions involved in the A-H side mean that something is off with the overall troop numbers. Add to that the total number of soldiers that AH was able to raise, which is according to more reliable estimates less than eight million. And otl, they had that front, the eastern front, and occupation duty in the northern Balkans, in addition to keeping the peace inside the empire itself. Even going by the highest estimates of a bit over nine million troops, something is still off.

Most likely - again, as noted before - the number of German soldiers was far larger than the number imply. In your atl, none of these are there.

Nor is such mobilization numbers going to happen. Mobilizing all of those men would automatically bring in others. More or less like the ultimatums otl. You'd also need a lot more troops than otl to keep internal order.

Germans won't supply them with resources. Not only is that expensive, but would be self-defeating in terms of allies. And A-H doesn't have the resources, or really even access to them, to operate on its own. Italy at least has shipping access worth mentioning.

Italy almost broke through on smaller scales several times prior to the German offensives, and the one major almost break-through. All that while being somewhat outnumbered, given German forces. Remember, the only time the CP forced them back was that late German offensive (let's not kid ourselves - A-H had almost no involvement in that)

Italian forces were also more modernized, better equipped, and far easier to mobilize. They could also easily encourage revolts in AH. Remember, the Russians beat the tar out of A-H, who had to be saved by German troops.

Really, A-H would have collapsed years before it did had it not been for German forces and aid. Like a weak house of cards.

Italy, imo, actually got very few Allied units to help it - and those were basically all after the German offensive. Saw very little use, too. And they won "decisive" victories before they arrived, too.

A-H's incompetence is not exaggerated. There's quite literally nothing about it that could, by the time period, be described as "competent." That you give A-H what amounts to god mode with tactics makes it even worse.

Remember, this is a nation that could not beat Serbia on its own, despite holding all of the "cards," until the Bulgarians joined and they surrounded them. Aren't going to be out-thinking squat.

Also, unlike otl, the Hungarians would be very apathetic towards a war with Italy alone. Would be viewed as an Austrian thing. To say nothing of A-H not having any ghost's chance of affording it. Italy's economic situation may have been bad, but A-H was unquestionably worse.

So, Italy wins. Not easily or quickly, but A-H would give up eventually, probably with great internal pressure for it.

Now, remember too, that that was only part of the reason it is ASB.

Not only is the peace treaty insane, as others noted too, but you also basically ignore the international situation. Having A-H forces actually be good, overall, doesn't help.

If A-H and Italy were to go to war like that, you would have other neighbors of A-H get more or less involved, though not necessarily officially/outright. In essence, you delay the Great War by a few years.

Lordganon (talk) 12:10, May 26, 2014 (UTC)

Not at all exaggerating them. Italy, imo, was winning without Allied troops around, and the Germans had to rapidly deploy troops there in order to prevent a breakthrough. That period is the only time A-H managed to advance against the Italians - and to say that it was A-H that advanced, imo, is basically not true, given that it was German troops that did it.

Only countries Russia could even come close to claiming a quality advantage over would have been A-H (debatable) and the Ottomans (unquestionable). Their only advantage was numbers. To say that that army was anywhere near good is just false.

For the incompetent commanders in A-H, that IS basically god mode. Especially since it comes out of nowhere.

A-H is a land power. They aren't going to make more ships on any real level. And the Italian Navy is both larger and stronger. Plus, it showed in both wars a great ability to innovate, and would do the same here. A fight between the two, A-H loses.

Wrong about the demise of A-H. Wasn't really those groups that were responsible - rather, it was A-H's general incompetence that was to blame. They were the country least prepared and least able to fight in that war. Had it not been for German aid/troops, they would have collapsed within two years.

On the contrary, you'd see open resistance by the minorities. All of the states around them would at minimum sponsor it. They didn't do that otl because they couldn't get them resources. Look at how many of them went over to the Allies as soon as they could - now picture those people, even just a few percent, resisting. Not fun.

Reorganize the High Command? Not only is Hungary never going to go for that, but they'd revolt if it was tried.

Homogeneous units? You just trained, armed, and localized rebels. And, Hungary would never go for it.

No way they change how they mobilize - not that that would be all that relevant.

Lordganon (talk) 10:55, May 30, 2014 (UTC)

The majority of A-H troops were on the Italian front. By the time that front got going, it held the vast majority. You vastly overstate the numbers they held elsewhere. In fact, there was only a few hundred thousand in those areas within a few months of the Italian entry.

The Italians made progress well before that, and it had nothing to do with minorities.

A-H didn't reinforce it, really. Virtually all the troops that went there at that point were German. And you say four divisions like it means something - doesn't. Not only was it more than four divisions that they sent, but the divisions were massively oversized.

The Italian commander statement holds little truth, and was far, far, far more valid for A-H.

Funny, you claim to be a fan of the battleships, yet you get most of the details wrong. At the time of Italy entering the otl war - near enough to yours to render other things moot - they outnumbered A-H in terms of Dreadnoughts, and had a slightly more modern series of Pre-Dreadnoughts, of roughly even numbers. They also had more in the "pipeline" to be built, and were further along with them. That is, in addition, to Italy having more or other types of vessels - torpedo boats, etc. - than A-H.

Their crews were also more experienced, having served against the Ottos, and better supplied. For that matter, the Italians also had/have far more capacity to build more ships.

Supplies - big problem. A-H more or less ran out by mid-1916 otl, and had to be supplied by Germany. Italy did not need to be supplied like that. In your atl, A-H won't get that. But Italy will still have some ability to do so. Their troops would be able to be supplied, but A-H would not.

Italy's early offensives gained quite a bit of ground, against a fully-mobilized A-H. Odds are with an A-H less mobilized, they get much further. You'll see cities lost.

Not only is that not a tactic, but it's also not what you said at first, or what your article does. And the degree of incompetence in A-H military commanders was extraordinary - they would never even notice. That problem goes throughout their entire command structure.

A "more competent structure" can only happen by removing power from the two military commands, and giving it to the central one. That is an unquestionable loss of power for Hungary. Even reforms under that margin - not that they would be at all effective in any way, shape, or form - would still greatly anger Hungary.

That you think the minorities would be happy because of that is disturbing. They would not be. All it manages is training, concentrating, equipping, and supplying, potential rebels - and to top it off, keeping them in one spot near their homes. A-H would had to be insane to do that. And, as noted, Hungary would never do it.

The governmental structure and hierarchy of A-H, combined with their infrastructure, means that that mobilization method has to be it. Two points, not one, fyi - one for each half.

Not kidding here: Anything that even remotely smacks of a loss of power, or even adjusting it to other areas, for Hungary, and it does not happen in A-H.

Lordganon (talk) 09:50, May 31, 2014 (UTC)

Giving up on NGW?
No,more no no Great War? Saturn120  19:14, May 1, 2014 (UTC)

PMIII
Join me on chat, pls? Cookiedamage (talk) 16:52, May 11, 2014 (UTC)

Apologies RE
I understand the frustration, and we most certainly did not agree with one another on the war, but I have tried to treat your loss with dignity. When you read my PM post, my king gave a speech on the strength and bravery of Hamburg and its people. I respect you, I do, I also have issues with people being rude. Nonetheless the apology is accepted. Hamburg will likely be turned into a vassal, and once I PU with Oldenburg, I will merge the two and create a German duchy, that way it will remain German. Again I thank you for the apology and I likewise apologize for any untoward words. Good DayALLONS-Y!!,Basically, RUN!! 01:40, May 16, 2014 (UTC)

Re:VH contest thing
That contest has been over for years now. As stated in the Timeline's, I'm not accepting/allowing any new nation or settlement ideas. If you are messaging me due to a proposed nation idea on the talk page, that post has been removed and will be ignored.-- 15:19, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

Bremen Purchase
Here's a link to the exchange:

Bremen Purchase

Cookiedamage (talk) 02:39, May 29, 2014 (UTC)

Fellow Centrie,

I have codified the beliefs of the Centrist Party here. Please, please, please spread this link around. It has a tutorial about Wiki Politics, our mission, goals, and an action plan, the history of our Party, and what makes us different as a political party.

If you have a desire to run for President, please say so on my talk page. The leadership of the party will then assess the slew of potential candidates and make our determination.

Thank You,

07:18, June 8, 2014 (UTC)

Hi wanna join chat real quick?

Cookiedamage (talk) 23:59, June 25, 2014 (UTC)

Elections
Hello! I am Reximus55, founder and facilitator of the Centrist Party. I am contacting you to let you know that you the Government Simulation Elections are today! Go here: User blog:Mscoree/June Election to vote.

I do not want to tell you how to vote, but if you'd like to stand for all the things that make this wiki great, leave a comment under Ms' comment saying

"Bfoxius/Reximus55

Centrist

Centrist"

If you have any questions, please catch me on chat or drop a message on my Talk Page.

20:47, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

1550 HRE chancellery elections
Would Friedrich II like to run for the chancellery in the 1550 elections? it might be weird since he'd be going against Catherine of Bavaria's cousin, but I think it'd be doable. Cookiedamage (talk) 22:54, June 27, 2014 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure a chancellor has to be a ruler of some sort, whether it be a sovereign monarch or vassal lord. they have to already preside over some sort of country.Cookiedamage (talk) 23:02, June 27, 2014 (UTC)

The Hessian Dynasty Act is still up for voting, so feel free to vote on it. Cookiedamage (talk) 17:35, June 30, 2014 (UTC)

Yo Guy, if your on, I need to speak to you in chat. Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 19:22, July 18, 2014 (UTC)

Chat?
I really want to talk to about something and settle everything. Would you join me on chat? Cookiedamage (talk) 17:17, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Warning
What makes you think an edit war is a legitimate thing of getting things done? Stop or face harsher consequences. Same with Cookie.

And FYI, Cookie is right in that algorithm. Fed (talk) 17:11, July 25, 2014 (UTC)

Royal Marriage Proposal
Hi, I'm contacting all the major nations in Europe in PM3 to tell you about some royal marriage proposals available this turn, for three different royal families. On my turn there are currently fifteen people who are looking for a spouse, simply reply to my turn as soon as you can to reserve a person. I will be looking over the proposals to try to avoid incest (although a little incest never killed nobody haha), and if you'd like to see family relations yourself, feel free to check out this page, where the family tree is located. If you would like further information or my recommendations for a particular person, message me back with your available children and their ages and I will get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 15:44, August 11, 2014 (UTC)

1848
come on to chat please we need to discuss a few things. With Blood and Iron (talk) 22:58, August 28, 2014 (UTC)

Hi, IATG. I was wondering if you can you remove your sig from the Treaty of Konigsberg? It was rewritten by NonEuc and is not the same treaty that you signed. 06:07, September 2, 2014 (UTC)

Signature
I saw you removed your signature as Rex asked you. I just wanted to tell you that it doesn't matter at this point. You're fighting people like Spain, and he is ensuring that Livonia is one hundred percent annexed, by an assortment of people. You should consider yourself lucky that he didn't add you in too, because he has every right and ability to. For that reason I advise you to not fight them on this, as it will only be made worse. Rex is still basically in denial and editing the algorithm for basic errors, but again at this point it doesn't matter. Mscoree (talk) 20:40, September 2, 2014 (UTC)

The war may be pathetic, but it would be ashame if they decided to annex you too, so for your own safety I recommend you just go along with it. Mscoree (talk) 21:07, September 2, 2014 (UTC)

I am currently on chat. Mscoree (talk) 20:53, October 2, 2014 (UTC)

Duplication
Greetings. Recently, you have uploaded a file on this site that is a duplicate of another. Please keep in mind that many of the files used on Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons have also been uploaded to this site — with all of them having been uploaded under the same file names used on those sites (making it quite easy to locate any files you may need). If you are using the "Visual" mode for editing and uploading, please be advised that you will be required to use underscores instead of spaces when searching for a file (e.g., "Flag_of_Canada.svg" and not "Flag of Canada.svg"). In the event that the file you acquire has not already been uploaded onto this site, than we highly recommended that you upload the standard file used on Wikipedia and/or Wikimedia Commons as a courtesy to current and future users.

The following uploads have have been removed from this site, and have been replaced with the following correct files:


 * File:Österreich-Wappen (1934-1938).jpg → File:Österreich-Wappen (1934-1938).svg

Please try not to let this happen again. Do not re-upload this files. Do not remove this message from your talk page. Disciplinary actions will be taken if duplications continue. Thank you. -- 14:31, October 22, 2014 (UTC)

Greetings Hamburg from the new King of the Cherokee
Hi I am that guy, I'm Von. I am a returning player from the PM 1 & 2 days, and now looking to build myself something in PM3.

I've joined PM3 as the Cherokee nation so I figure we better establish relations with each other. Basically I don't want the land your nation currently holds near mine, and in fact I want your colony to grow further in land to maybe the size of north carolina and some. Dividing the interior of the USA south is basically the purpose of my nation and I aim to have it destroyed in about 100 years, and the area divided between you, Rome and France.

The backstory of my nation is that a merchant with ties to Roman merchants in the area did a coup against the old King, so basically we are allies because you Europeans helped get my King in power. I will use my European friendships trade to help expand my Cherokee empire to dominance over the South USA. However as would be historically accurate, eventually I will be destroyed by the surrounding European nations.

How are your relations with Rome and France btw? So I can figure out a good plan/story of how my Kingdom will fall, and the region be shaped by the colonial politcs.

WHat say you?

VonGlusenburg (talk to Von!) 04:34, October 29, 2014 (UTC)

Uploading Correct Files
As of lately you've been uploading files straight from Wikimedia but have not been uploading the correct file types and names (for some I've seen). In the future, please upload these files as the exact same as on Wikimedia (naming, file type, size) as this allows all users to easily find these files in the future. It would also be a big courtesy to add the licensing while uploading these files (which can be done while uploading them). I thank you for your cooperation and I'm always here if you require any assistance. -- 22:22, October 30, 2014 (UTC)

Re: HRE
That sounds like a plan! It'll be good to have a bloc in opposition to the rising Bavaria. Callumthered (talk) 23:33, November 1, 2014 (UTC)

Congress of Vienna - Reinstalled
You received this message because you have signed up for this map game.

The map game has started. However, because too few people have posted, we are keeping the first turn at 2 days. From the second turn onwards, it will be one turn per day. Please post as soon as possible.

I look forward to seeing your first post.

Regards, Laptop Zombie 03:54, November 9, 2014 (UTC)

it's
"it's" is ONLY the contraction of "it is."

Bil

EoGuy (talk) 23:53, December 4, 2014 (UTC)

Congrats!
Congrats on your wiki hero badge! U <font color="#FF0000">p <font color="#3C8D0D">v <font color="#FF0000">o <font color="#3C8D0D">t <font color="#FF0000">e <font color="#3C8D0D">a <font color="#FF0000">n <font color="#3C8D0D">t <font color="#FF0000">h <font color="#3C8D0D">o <font color="#FF0000">l <font color="#3C8D0D">o <font color="#FF0000">g <font color="#3C8D0D">y  <font color="#FF0000">( <font color="#3C8D0D">T <font color="#FF0000">, <font color="#3C8D0D">S <font color="#FF0000">)'

Secret Santa Giveaway
If you are being contacted it means that you won a free game in the Secret Santa Giveaway. To redeem your free prize reply back to me with your steam username, email, or some other form of contact information, or find me on chat as soon as possible.

Also if you have not already done so, make sure you send your gift to your designated target.

Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 00:06, December 24, 2014 (UTC)

I'm a make you an offer you can't refuse for your expansion
Hi I come from the glorious United Kingdom of the Cherokee and Shawana. How is your nation Hamburg doing?

My own nation is in a bit of a slump, I just got a new King and well he is a bit young and reckless. He wants to make his father's nation much more powerful and to avenge him to bring back honour to his family. One way he sees doing this is to expand his nation to the sea so his Kingdom is completely in control of its own over-land trade routes. Plus then the Kingdom could do some overseas expansion...

He sees the Hamburg colony in OTL North Carolina as his easiest way to get sea access. What is the name of this colony btw?

Anyway due to my commitments to the game being rather terrible currently and looking bad for the rest of the year, I was wondering if we could stage a war between ourselves in which you win control of my nation as you defeat it by supporting a coup against the aggressive new king who brashly starts a war against one of its neighbouring European colonial trading partners.

The war will start after the newly created royal army while on a campaign to subdue the ex-cahokian territory, and after a good bit of battle and expansion the King grows in power-lust. Seeing the defensives of Hamburg's near-by colony, he launches an invasion against it. While initially successful, your Hamburg guys eventually kill him and start a counter-attack against the United Cherokee-Shawana Kingdom, pushing deep into my territory. At which point a disgruntled Shawana Chief will side with Hamburg, stage a coup, kill all of the royal family and force the remaining royal Princess to marry him. Thus a new King and dynasty starts in the United Shawana-Cherokee Kingdom, one which is under Hamburg authority, a new large vassal state for you to rule. The map I've posted here shows what I expect the situation to look like come 1740 when all of this plan should be over and done with.

I will leave the game and you will take over my nation. You get the United Cherokee-Shawana Kingdom as a large powerful vassal nation, which you are free to split into two vassal states if you prefer (so a Shawana and a Cherokee vassal). What do you think of my plan?

<font color="#000000">VonGlusenburg (talk to Von!) 02:14, December 28, 2014 (UTC)

Over these next 10 years. 1730-1732 will be me building up my military to prepare. I will be expanding into that civil disarray territory for two years after that. Then I will attack your Hamburg colony in 1735 and we will wage a five year war. During the second year my King is killed, and his younger brother becomes King. Then in the fourth year the Shawana Chief who allies with Hamburg will kill off the royal family in the Cherokee capital, except the eldest royal princess who will become Queen of the United Kingdom and the Shawana Chief who usurps the throne in his coup forces her to marry him. WIth support of your Hamburg troops the final fifth year is spent killing off the remaining royalists to the previous dynasty. Then bam in 1740 the United Shawana-Cherokee Kingdom is your vassal state.

Starting from 1741 onwards you will then post as the United Shawana-Cherokee Kingdom. You will probably find my Cherokee nation page very helpful in creating your posts for your new vassal. I'd suggest a rest period, then split up the United Kingdom into two parts, a Shawana vassal and a Cherokee vassal. Then you continuing to expand both vassals, the Shawana can peacefully expand either east or west into the civil disarray territory, and the Cherokee can expand through war if you decide to. Personally I'd focus the Cherokee vassal's economy and building up a large supply of cash crops such as cotton and tobbaco to support Hamburg's economy; get a slave trade going. For the record I don't personally believe in slavery, its just right for the 1700s period of colonialism haha. <font color="#000000">VonGlusenburg (talk to Von!) 02:35, December 28, 2014 (UTC)