Alternative History:Request for user rights

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF (user rights). Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only 1 administrator for every 1,000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time a new one is needed or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

IMPORTANT: only registered users with 100 or more edits and at least one month on this wiki will be allowed to vote in the user nominations or to nominate candidates.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, as long as they accept the nomination first.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.
 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Mscoree
Well this user, Mscoree is a wonder full user who try really hard to keep this wiki going he is in the top 10 editors, and kept on this wiki because of his map game NotLAH. He is active in his awesome Doomsday articles and even better his awesome Yellostone articles. He nominated once when he was kind of immature, but he has really improved. Now he is a great guy helping me out whenever I need help even when I am super annoying. OCT MARIUS, HAIL HIM  01:36, November 20, 2013‎


 * Supporters
 * Tr0llis (talk) 01:41, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * User:Edboy452 [[Image:Flag of Romania.svg|25px|border]] [[Image:Flag of German Reich (1935–1945).svg|25px|border]] [[Image:Flag of Israel.svg|25px|border]] [[Image:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg|25px|border]] (talk) 01:42, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * The Unchallenged Conqueror #FP (Talk to Me) 01:43, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Rcchang
 * Bfoxius
 * RazorFangZ14 (talk) 01:55, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * NonEuclidean (talk) 02:13, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Survivor321
 * Flag of the Hurian Federation.png Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 03:31, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Flag_of_HRE_(The_Kalmar_Union).svg.png Labarum.jpg CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes" 13:55, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Warman555 (talk) 22:15, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Reximus55 talk 22:17, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Daeseunglim (talk) 22:36, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * "This is not your grave  but you are welcome in it. "
 * Eiplec - ಠ_ಠ (talk) 01:48, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Daxus Inferno
 * The Old Baby 2
 * SkyGreen24 (talk) 20:58, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * DS|The Rainbow Machete 21:00, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Objectors
 * Sorry, still feel like you're lacking in the customer relations department.
 * FirstStooge (talk) 12:56, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * I like him, but he's (no offense intended) an idiot. He has experience but just isn't ready for this, as he proved with his actions on the TSPTF talkpage. Guns
 * Not a single one of those claims, OM, were actually true. Lordganon (talk) 12:20, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * NFSreloaded (talk) 21:14, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Discussion
 * Regardless of very obvious historical issues he has had with people i believe he has shaped up well, and would be a great addition as constable, ive had a great time getting things together for the Yellowstone TL with him and have seen noticeable improvement in behavior. The Unchallenged Conqueror #FP (Talk to Me)
 * Mscoree seems to be a great and active contributor to our wiki. Despite problems in the past, he has become much more active and mature in the time following his previous nomination. He frequently works on many timelines, and has modded in many map games, is the top non-TSPF contributor besides Iwaschris, and helps people out around the wiki, most notably adding categories, and frequently giving feedback on pages. Due to this, I believe he should be made Constable. phyrexia_symbol.png Yawgmoth, Lord of the Wastes phyrexia_symbol.png
 * He seems pretty fair, and has good grammar (more than I can say about other people on this wiki), and he's a friend. For these reasons (and ulterior motives) I support him fully. Daxus Inferno (talk) 01:52, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * I support him out of principle. Flag of the Hurian Federation.png Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 03:31, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Time is not something that everyone has. NonEuclidean (talk) 13:20, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Except for Time Lords. Flag_of_HRE_(The_Kalmar_Union).svg.png Labarum.jpg CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes"
 * I like him, but he's clearly not ready. I mean, remember his thing- not even a month ago - on the TSPTF page? Every Silver Lining has it's Cloud...  (And here I am!)
 * What thing? You mean when I made an appeal to the TSPTF in accordance with the rules? Mscoree (talk) 20:52, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * How much longer can you possibly wait? You never are ready, just ready enough, as they say. MS has demonstrated an unprecedented and unrivaled dedication to the wiki, at one point even making over 1,000 edits in one week. He has dozens of pages, in dozen of timelines. There's a reason that new contributors contact him as opposed to some of the admins on the site. NonEuclidean (talk) 21:11, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * So, a lot has already been said about Ms. I sincerely consider him to be a great guy, although I wasn't his friend right away. We were not too close, but he was a leader of a whole community, which he still (arguably) can be said to lead. He has been recognized through NotLAH and now FMG. He helps a ton with YS. Frequently on chat, he really gets a chance to communicate with the users of this wiki. Lately, his behavior (I spelled it the British way on accident first!), not that it was bad to start with, has really been worthy of the TSPTF. He is a great guy, as I have said. He has my full support, and I wish the TSPTF considers Ms as he is now - a thing I feel is important for all users nominated to the office. Thanks you for hearing me out! He has my vote, and I hope he has your vote also. [User:Reximus55] [User talk:Reximus55] 22:25, November 20, 2013 (UTC) (Does LG get a vote, since that would be a bit biased?)
 * Of course LG gets a vote. All votes are biased, in real life and here. 22:28, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * When I say idiot I mean that he doesn't learn. Not that he's stupid. Also, by that comparison, all the people who are friends with Ms don't get a vote either Also, Rex, your sig be screwing up the page.
 * Just so we're clear, everyone who means the requirements gets a vote. Mscoree (talk) 23:09, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * This probably isn't the best time to voice this opinion, but I'd just like to say I'm not a big fan of the weighted vote system. Even though I've already gotten seventeen votes, it's still almost impossible for me to win, since if just two or three TSPTF members vote no then I require a practically unfeasible amount of TSPTF votes yes. Just something to think about. Mscoree (talk) 00:30, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree on the flawed voting system. It would be the equivalent of having 2/3rds of Congress approve any new congressman + the vote of the people. Daxus Inferno (talk) 01:05, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * It is kinda like modern unknown dictators like Vladimir Putin, who has made it law to run for an office u gotta have the Dumas approval. So basically Putins party stays in power  No matter what the people think  FLAWED. Now everyone say what u think. MS FOR BRASS later [[Image:Flag of Russian Alaska (HR).svg |40px|link=User talk:Octivian Marius]] OCT MARIUS, HAIL HIM  [[Image: Flag of Italy (Federalist Italy).svg|40px|User talk:Octavian Marius]]
 * Okay slow down, but I see what you're saying. Mscoree (talk) 02:02, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Rex, lose that thing. I have removed it from this page, and I don't want to see it ever again. Seriously, that is just insane. Ms, do not screw up the layout like that ever again. OM, read the rules next time. Lordganon (talk) 12:08, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * I have removed the signature without an actual name on it, and because Dax wrote his on there twice, I removed both of them as well. Feel free to write your names on there again, but actually make it a username and don't sign it twice again. Lordganon (talk) 12:08, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * There is nothing "weighted" about our system. It is specifically designed to head off attempts by people that have basically nothing here from spamming through a bad nomination over the objections of the staff. So, in other words, exactly this situation. Lordganon (talk) 12:20, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Overall, I have to say that virtually none of the claims about what Ms has been doing are in fact true. All his attempts to "help" have been a nuisance, and not been even remotely helpful. Lordganon (talk) 12:20, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry I made the discussion section its own subsection. There was a lot of comments. Can you add those people's votes back that you removed? Also the system you just described makes it "weighted". Basically some votes are more valuable than others. Mscoree (talk) 14:11, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * I added the people LG removed back up for the time being. They can re-add themselves when they get around to it. Mscoree (talk) 17:00, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * The weighted vote system... *sigh*... is a poll of the most respected members of the wiki in addition to that of regular members. Well, when I say 'respected' I mean it loosely. We're counting Scraw in that category after all xDD  The Mighty Guns is too Glorious (or lazy) to go to source mode and type out his real sig  (Dammit, Guns!)  20:02, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * It's not a poll, it's a vote. Certain votes are separated. Mscoree (talk) 20:58, November 21, 2013 (UTC)

CourageousLife
Cour is one of the most respected map gamers on this wiki, and indeed is one of the steadying influencing on the wild implausogasms of some of our more recent members *wink*. He's also had bountiful experience dealing with trolls and idiots, as he has moderated several map games where these species are more common. Come to think of it, he's had bountiful experience in general, having spent nigh on two years on the wiki. Who else signs off like this? (And yes, clicking on the link is cheating -_-) 20:27, November 20, 2013‎


 * Supporters
 * Yes, he is very much suited for the position. Also Guns, you forgot the support/object/discuss sections. Fool.
 * phyrexia_symbol.png Yawgmoth, Lord of the Wastes phyrexia_symbol.png, Courageous has been on the wki for quite some time, and is very good at helping out, especially with map games. You have my vote.
 * You know who i am (TOB says "wow)
 * DS|The Rainbow Machete 21:00, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * [[Image:1.png|23px]] Imp (Say Hi?!) 22:34, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Objectors
 * Lordganon (talk) 12:20, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * FirstStooge (talk) 15:02, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * NFSreloaded (talk) 21:14, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Discussion
 * You forgot the 'ers'. Fool. xDDD
 * ​Do I have to accept the nomination, or is it only after I'm elected? CourageousLife (talk) 02:40, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * You have to accept it and give a reason why prior. Lordganon (talk) 12:20, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * You have to accept it and give a reason why prior. Lordganon (talk) 12:20, November 21, 2013 (UTC)

The old baby 2
Well i would like to nominate TOB a great contributor who works hard and gets along with everyone. OCT MARIUS, HAIL HIM  02:07, November 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * Supporters
 * Morgan Freeman (talk) 02:09, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Rcchang (talk) 15:08, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * DS|The Rainbow Machete 21:00, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Objectors
 * I like toby, he's a nice guy, but I personally don't think he's ready for the TSPTF.
 * Lordganon (talk) 12:20, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * FirstStooge (talk) 15:00, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Oct. Gods above. Stop nominating people. Not that I don't like Toby. but not enough edits, not enough experience... and I think it's nice if they have some off map game work...  The Mighty Guns is too Glorious (or lazy) to go to source mode and type out his real sig  (Dammit, Guns!)  19:59, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * NFSreloaded (talk) 21:14, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Discussion
 * Stop playing around with the TSPTF nominations! FirstStooge (talk) 15:00, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... I like TOB and he is nice, but he only has 800+ edits and I think you need a bit more edits to become a TSPTF or else everyone would be one.

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, a long as they accept the nomination.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Rules

 * Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.
 * They are a Lieutenant.
 * They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month—from the day the nomination is put forth—are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for nomination to be accepted.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Impeachment
It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

 * User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
 * If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment.
 * Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
 * Registered users' votes must have 2/3rd supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month—from the day the nomination is put forth—are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a 2/3rd supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons
There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:
 * They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
 * They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
 * They have have not been fair, restrained, and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
 * They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

Note: One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.

Current Impeachments
===Name of TSPTF member===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.