United Nations (Axis vs Allies Revised)

The United Nations is an international group of nations dedicated to peace and propserity over the world. It was founded by Great Britain, the United States, Germany, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and India.

United Nations Security Council Permanant Members
United States

Great Britain

Germany

Turkey

India

Saudi Arabia

Brazil

United Nations Security Council Non-Permanant Members
Korea

Yugoslavia

Switzerland

Spain

France

Netherlands

Sweden

UN Members Currently not in the Security Council
Japan

DSAR

Portugal

Persia

UN Resolution #1: Mediating peace between France and Italy
This vote is decided by majority vote. This would, effectively, send peacekeeping troops into the warzones of France and Italy, and their African lands, in order to bring order to the land, and broker peace between the two countries. If the countries do not stop hostilities against each other, then they will be dealt with via economic sanctions and peace will be forcibly made within 5 years.

Agree

 * Flag_Of_UK.png Britain
 * India_Flag.png India
 * Brazil_1.png Brazil
 * Flag_of_Weimar_Germany.pngny
 * Saudi_Arabia_Flag_1938.png Saudi Arabia
 * USA.jpg United States
 * Flag of South Korea.png Korea
 * France.PNG France
 * Spain

Disagree

 * Turkey.png Turkey
 * Sweden.flag.png Sweden
 * Persia

Discussions

 * Turkey.png Turkey: The UN is a self-regulating body and as such cannot take military action against a nation which is not a member of the UN. If our goal is to spread peace and prosperity over the globe, then we cannot do so by breaking the moral structure of the UN itself in order to do so. We cannot be an exclusively partisan alliance if we are indeed to function as a neutral international legislative mechanism in which every nation freely takes part in.


 * Flag_Of_UK.png Britain: We are indeed being neutral. If France and Italy do not make peace, then both will be dealt with, not just Italy. There would be no gains on either side, and the appropriate amount would be payed mutually, to see that the countries can recover.


 * Turkey.png Turkey: That's not my point. You cannot truly be neutral if you are sending in troops to pacify an area, as that would inevitably lead to fighting both nations. We are in no way supporting Italy, rather, we are supporting France. Either way, as Italy is not a member of the UN, we cannot allow the use of force upon a nation which is not within the organization. The UN is an inherently self-regulating body, andas such we cannot take offensive action against a nation which does not wish to be regulated.

Agree

 * Turkey.png Turkey
 * Sweden.flag.png Sweden
 * USA.jpg United States
 * Flag of South Korea.png Korea
 * Saudi_Arabia_Flag_1938.png Saudi Arabia

Disagree

 * India_Flag.png India
 * Brazil_1.png Brazil
 * Flag_of_Weimar_Germany.png Germany
 * France.PNG France
 * Britain
 * Spain
 * Persia

Discussion

 * Flag_of_Weimar_Germany.png Germany: We have reason to believe that Siam has continued to wage war with India over a small piece of land, Germanys resolution to the problem? The territory be split in half.
 * India_Flag.png India: Siam made peace with India already, we apologized, and they backed off from Tenasserim.
 * Unknown: I still believe that dividing it would do some good, but if there is peace let it stand where it is.
 * France.PNG France: It keeps invading regions, don't let it in.
 * Siam recently attacked British soil without provocation, and as such, has lost our support in her joining the UN.

Proposals and Disscusion
''' Germany: Depending on the actions of that nation, any can join the U.N. by going through series of processes and cannot if any rule associtated with the U.N. is broken such as Human rights. This proposal is to ensure that all nations joining will be willing to follow these rules. Any objections?'''

 Britain: Each non-permanent SC member will be rotated every two years, so that it is fair, and unbiased.

''' United States: I think that there should be 15 security members at all times. 7 being permanant, 8 being non-permanant. Every 2 years, we should rotate the non-permenant. '''

United States: Also, I think the rest of the UN can vote on General Resolutions, while, the SC can vote on Security Concil resolutions.