User blog comment:Tr0llis/Voting System/@comment-4621372-20131203204003/@comment-1789156-20131205200444

That's actually the opposite of a democracy. Interesting opinion.

Maybe we should promote a system where trolls do wise up, or are at least incentivized to.

When you say, "The Public, (us) shouldn't decide who gets into the Police Force," that is not democracy (not even the oligarchical elective democracy that the sole TSPTF representative here expressed). Furthermore your point (and your analogy) makes no sense whatsoever. To reply in multiple interpretations: In the real world people have to (at least try to) get along with coworkers. Police men don't vote in other police men. People disagreeing isn't the fault in the system that this topic references to.

If the "Police don't agree with who is put in" I don't think that's how the system should work (I have just established two differing political stances). Police (and/or the government) shouldn't decided who they let into office. The president doesn't get to decide to veto elections because he doesn't like the results, and if they did that would basically be a popularity contest/vote-for-your-friends arrangement.

"I will blank all your pages, and we will see who fixes it. The TSPTF, or Oct." That's kind of a bias example considering Oct isn't able, nor is it his job, to ban vandals. That's like asking, "If I set your house on fire, who will help? A fire fighter or a veterinarian?"