Alternative History:Request for user rights

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF (user rights). Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only one administrator for every 1000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time a new one is needed or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

IMPORTANT: only registered users with 200 or more edits and at least two months on this wiki will be allowed to vote in the user nominations or to nominate candidates.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, as long as they accept the nomination first.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.
 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail or been blocked in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

JoshTheRoman
JoshTheRoman has been on here for a good deal of time as of now, and in that period of time, he has accomplished more than most of us have in our whole careers. His flagship timeline, Bellum Romanum, made with the help of Mscoree, is well-written, thought-provoking, and very well organized. He remains active on that timeline, alongside several smaller ones with very interesting PoDs and a couple of map games. Josh also is often on chat and interacting with the community, offering help to many users on their various endeavors. I have no doubt that he will be an asset to the TSPTF if he makes it. —Bfoxius (talk)


 * Supporters


 * Objectors


 * Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, a long as they accept the nomination.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Rules

 * Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.
 * They are a Lieutenant.
 * They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for nomination to be accepted.
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

MP
Monster Pumpkin is a good user. He has been here for two years and in those two years, he has been a valued and respected member of the community. He is one of the few active lieutenants and often does his duty against vandals and trolls and any other problem that might face the wiki. I believe he definitely has what it takes to be promoted. He has demonstrated that he is capable of exercising his powers properly and is also frequently seen in chat, which allows him to interact with the users of the wiki. MP has been a good lieutenant, so I think it's time for him to become a brass.

04:45, April 7, 2015 (UTC)

19:28, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * Supporters
 * Saturn120 04:46, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * .....  Because I'm Just... Too... SSSWWWEEEEEETTT!!!
 * Upvote_User_Flag_New.png  April showers,   bring May flowers. Egypt Flag Final 2.png
 * SkyGreen24 19:27, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * Local Mafia Boss (Talk) (Blog)
 * Prinsenvlag.svg Hail Sean! (Get a free potato here)
 * YAS.
 * Crim de la Crème 19:30, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * can't think of anyone more deserving I am that guy (talk)
 * —Bfoxius (talk)
 * Objectors
 * Discussion
 * ​Alright, well, I'm kinda tired right now, so I'll wait and see what the tally is tomorrow before gracing this with a speech. "This is not your grave  but you are welcome in it. " 04:49, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * MP is probably the best TSPTF there is, the greatest it has had, and the best it will have.
 * First I want to thank Scraw for his eloquent and meaningful nomination. As to the nomination, I accept it, and should the wikia community so chose, I will use my new powers to help make the wikia a better place and help those who contribute. In my years as a contributer and my time as an LT, I have observed many different conflicts between members of the TSPTF, members of the general community, or even between the members and the TSPTF. It is my hope and mission that, if I am elected, I will help these different groups of contributers in any way that I can and always be a neutral voice in any conflict. I want to thank Scraw again for the nomination and the rest of the community for being what it is and what it does. "This is not your grave  but you are welcome in it. " 19:37, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * MP is probably the best TSPTF there is, the greatest it has had, and the best it will have.
 * First I want to thank Scraw for his eloquent and meaningful nomination. As to the nomination, I accept it, and should the wikia community so chose, I will use my new powers to help make the wikia a better place and help those who contribute. In my years as a contributer and my time as an LT, I have observed many different conflicts between members of the TSPTF, members of the general community, or even between the members and the TSPTF. It is my hope and mission that, if I am elected, I will help these different groups of contributers in any way that I can and always be a neutral voice in any conflict. I want to thank Scraw again for the nomination and the rest of the community for being what it is and what it does. "This is not your grave  but you are welcome in it. " 19:37, April 7, 2015 (UTC)

Impeachment
It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

 * User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
 * If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment.
 * Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
 * Registered users' votes must have two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons
There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:
 * They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
 * They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
 * They have have not been fair, restrained, and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
 * They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

Note: One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.

Current Impeachments
===Name of TSPTF member===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.