Alternative History talk:No Cross, No Crown

Reform
I have some concerns with No Cross, No Crown. First, how is it enforced? I've seen South delete a users comments & replaced it with "Deleted remark due to the political nature (about real life people) - NCNC principle". Is that right? If anything that is a political statement (i.e censorship)

The NCNC article states, "...it's important to note that No Cross No Crown is a behavior standard that, like everything else, reflects the history and culture of the people that abide by it."

Sometimes, in order to debate what would be most accurate for a TL, politics, religion & other related subjects have to be discussed to have an accurate as possible TL.

Would it not be easier if we just stuck to the "play nice" rule? Then we can let people have their debates and discussions so long as they are civil and respectful. (No name calling, stuff like that) That way we can discuss what ought to be done without the fear of the TSPTF swooping in and censoring comments. If the NCNC page states "it's a general rule of thumb or a guideline, not an ironclad rule.", why are comments being censored? It does not sit right with me.

Anyway, I'd like to hear what the people think about this. --GOPZACK 19:54, September 22, 2010 (UTC)