User blog comment:Hlovell/About joining the Doomsday 1983 team/@comment-32656-20120630082902/@comment-32656-20120630092741

Thirty years of disintegration following starvation, fighting, etc.at DD - most cities that were "abandoned" don't even rate that much by this point. To say nothing of the destroyed cities.

Yes, Atlanta is mentioned in a few spots - Jimmy Carter's escape from it in the Neonotia article, along with other details there, and a partial account of the Cuban exploration of its outskirts in 2007, and their finding of the Coke formula, in the Savannah and Kola Grande articles.

True, there are several articles on nuked, or even surviving, cities - there's even a category for them. But not every city should have an article on it - past a certain point, that'd be a ton of effort.

Doing articles on major cities in survivor states, or what the situation in nuked locations is today, that's one thing - and a good avenue to work at. But going after each and every city, like you seem to be proposing, just isn't.

And, for the record, the question of it being "ok" if you just made "base pages with headings, but little or no actual written content" - the best answer is "not really" but not "no," either. If that makes any sense.