Alternative History:Request for user rights

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF (user rights). Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only one administrator for every 1000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time a new one is needed or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

IMPORTANT: only registered users with 200 or more edits and at least two months on this wiki will be allowed to vote in the user nominations or to nominate candidates.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, as long as they accept the nomination first.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.
 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail or been blocked in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Toby2
Toby has been an active member of the wiki, has also reached a substantial number of edits and has begun working on his own timeline. In these six months he has improved as an editor and a member of the community in general which is why I humbly suggest that you, my fellow wikians, consider accepting him as a member of the TSPTF. Sincerely, Sky Green 24 - Join the party  20:25, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Supporters
 * Spartian300 (talk) 20:46, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * SwankyJ (talk) 22:16, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Blocky858 (talk) 11:31, July 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * &#34;SO SAYETH THE EAGLE&#34; - Fascist Eagle ಠ_ಠ (talk) 17:56, July 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Hailstormer (talk) 18:38, July 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Sine dei gloriem &#34;Ex Initio Terrae&#34; (talk) 19:32, July 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Feudalplague (talk) 01:18, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * FOR THE GLORY OF THE PARTY! 01:22, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Hurian Federation.png Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 01:57, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * 06:54, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * Lordganon (talk) 10:38, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
 * ChrisL123 (talk) 15:23, July 21, 2014 (UTC)


 * Objectors


 * Discussion
 * I accept nomination Toby2: THEY CALL ME Mr. Awesome!!!
 * You need to explain why you want the position, Toby. Lordganon (talk) 02:09, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * When he provides a real acceptance speech, I shall most likely vote "yea." 07:44, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok. I wish to have this position because I wish to help the wiki improve. The wiki is always evolving. I want to take part in steering the wiki in the right direction, and help fix vandalism. I've been trying to report vandals and solve chat disputes when I can, and with this I think I can do more to benefit the wikiToby2: THEY CALL ME Mr. Awesome!!!

Feudalplague
Since his last nomination, I think Feud has really grown. He's taken a leadership role in the popular map game, Principia Moderni III, being the guy many people go to with questions about the game and algorithms. It seems like he is one of the few people who knows when people deserve punishment and when people deserve lenience, leading me to believe that he would make an excellent chat moderator and a lovely addition to the TSPTF. To add to this, I've never seen him power-whoring (asking people if they think he'd make a good admin/constable). Through our many interactions, I have come to recognize Feud as a friend, be it through mod duty on PMIII to late night bromances (which LG can attest to) to simply joking around with other users on chat. All-in-all, if there's one person not in the TSPTF who needs to be in the TSPTF, it's this guy. I asked him on chat and he'd be interested and he said yes, so here we go. CrimsonAssassin-See you, space cowboys 00:37, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Supporters
 * Flag of Romania.svgToţi în unu; Nihil Sine DeoFlag of Romania.svg
 * &#34;SO SAYETH THE EAGLE&#34; - Fascist Eagle ಠ_ಠ (talk) 02:00, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Sine dei gloriem &#34;Ex Initio Terrae&#34; (talk) 02:20, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yep Toby2: THEY CALL ME Mr. Awesome!!!
 *  I am on the edge...  The EdgeofNight   01:21, July 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * Cookiedamage (talk) 17:46, July 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * FOR THE GLORY OF THE PARTY! 00:19, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * Fed (talk) 00:59, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * 01:03, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * Aye-Stephanus rex (talk) 23:12, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * Objectors
 * Flag of the Hurian Federation.png Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 00:26, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * Lordganon (talk) 10:23, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
 * While I had originally thought that a yes vote would be the best course of action, and I even nominated him a few months back, I have since reoconsidered. Feud is undoubtedly a great contributor, but the more I think about it, the less I see of him actually needing the title. Yes, he is a consistent member of the chat group, but we can see him being central a number of arguments. Furthermore (and time has passed, but its possibly b/c of summer) must I remind everyone of the times Feud came to chat drunk? He also has a poor mouth, which I feel is unfitting for a mod. 10:31, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
 * I feel like it isn't a good idea for Feud to become a constable anytime soon, recently his chat escapade when the new users came on made me reconsider his ability to stay calm under stress. Sorry. FirstChairmanLogo(Sky).pngSky Green 24 - Join the party FirstChairmanLogo(Sky).png 11:07, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
 * Discussion
 * ​I accept this nomination and all the responsibility stemming from it. I have spent a large amount of time on this wiki and in conjunction with people like Cookie, Rex, Sine, Fed, weve all come across and handled vandals as per the rules. I am whole heartedly for fighting against the vandalism of the wiki especially to prevent more of that ridiculousness we had with a few certain users (who shall remained unamed) Im also extremely interested in keeping with a consistent chat policy (not trying to call anyone out here) but while it has improved extremely, we still get socks, and really all around intolerable people that i feel like could be handled alot more promptly and consistently so as to prevent more of these spamming and harassment issues from cropping up. Along with all these, ive been an active contributor for a good while, and have been doing work along with Crim and a few others for a new Timeline as well as my own personal one. As much as is said here i believe i would do great in the Constable position, but i understand its something you earn and are not entitled too as a member of the wikia, and are expected to be one of the more mature, and helpful members of the Wiki.   Feudalplague (talk) 01:18, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * You need to explain why you want the position, FP. Lordganon (talk) 02:09, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah sorry i was going to get to that ill add to my previous post about it if thats alright with you. Feudalplague (talk) 02:24, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Does the nominator get to vote? 07:44, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't believe he's ready yet. Besides, we have enough constables as it is. Flag of the Hurian Federation.png Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 00:26, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey box people. Yeah, you. Get your boxes in a template. Gorram boxes. ~ Scraw 01:03, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * Can't nominate and then support it, Crim. Lordganon (talk) 10:23, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
 * I have an idea if Feud is not accepted again. We wait until 3 months until his school calendar and then re-evaluate. I really think his time spent on chat drunk is unacceptable, and while he has improved lately he also hasn't had much internet lately. If you are not on chat, you cannot be in trouble on chat. Additionally, he is central to many arguments which is also something a TSPTF member should not be. 16:26, July 21, 2014 (UTC) Addendum: I re-read the nomination and would like to make sure everyone knows that I consider Feud to be mi amigo also. However, the aforementioned concerns prevent me from being pushed over the top in favor of him.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, a long as they accept the nomination.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Rules

 * Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.
 * They are a Lieutenant.
 * They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a three-fourths supermajority for nomination to be accepted.
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Impeachment
It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

 * User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
 * If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment.
 * Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
 * Registered users' votes must have two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-third supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons
There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:
 * They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
 * They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
 * They have have not been fair, restrained, and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
 * They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

Note: One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.

Current Impeachments
===Name of TSPTF member===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.