Alternative History:Request for user rights

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF (user rights). Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only be one administrator for every 1000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time a new one is needed or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

IMPORTANT: Only registered users with 200 or more edits and at least two months on this wiki will be allowed to vote in the user nominations or to nominate candidates.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor so long as they accept the nomination first.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.
 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail or been blocked in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

WILDSTARSKAORI
WILDSTARSKAORI (or WILD for short) is a very trustworthy and active user on this site. WILD has operated several wikis and has been very successful in keeping order and organization. Not to mention WILD is one of the most likable and peaceful users on chat. For this, I certainly believe WILD should be granted the title of Constable.

Cheers,


 * Supporters
 * Blason_comte_fr_Anjou.svg By the grace of god Count of maine, Forcalquier, Anjou, and Provence, prince of albania and his highness the dauphin of France Belial.  22:48, June 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * .....  Because I'm Just... Too... SSSWWWEEEEEETTT!!!   4:18 PST, June 14, 2016
 * Better than most TSPTF we have Oh, I didn't mean to push that button! † Oh, well leave a message I guess  00:10, June 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * I offer my full support for WILD's promotion. —  The  Tim   Man  (TSW • AH • MGW • Contribs ) 01:12, June 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * Lieutenant of the Tsars royal guard, Lieutenant of the US Military
 * KawaiiKame (talk) 04:40, June 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Xanian Empire.svg Flag of Xyon.svg Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 05:55, June 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Xanian Empire.svg Flag of Xyon.svg Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 05:55, June 15, 2016 (UTC)


 * Objectors
 * As much as I like WILD as a person I don't think she is sutible as a chadmin. She has a constant tendency to blurt things that cahdmins shouldn't blurt. Such as this.
 * I don't see why not. *shrugs* Flag of the Xanian Empire.svg Flag of Xyon.svg Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 05:55, June 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * I would argue that Wild isn't actually that active. I see Wild in chat a lot but not making a great deal of comments or contribution. In general I don't think we need another chat admin really. Person67
 * Nothing against you Wild, but it just seems weird to have you as admin while Fires got denied Prinsenvlag.svg Hail Sean! (Get a free potato here)
 * Sean put your sig in a template please. Also no. #PraiseRoosevelt. 02:00, June 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry. Awesome history 28 (talk) 16:59, June 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Scraw. 20:36, June 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * FP Now 10% edgier!!! 20:59, June 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * Discussion
 * Viva why did you vote twice? Blason_comte_fr_Anjou.svg By the grace of god Count of maine, Forcalquier, Anjou, and Provence, prince of albania and his highness the dauphin of France Belial.  15:49, June 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * WILD is not nominated for admin, WILD is nominated for constable. @Sean ~UR
 * Viva's remark under "objections" is not a vote against WILD, but rather a remark in favor. At best it is a response to the opposition. At worst, it cancels out his support. --SouthWriter (talk) 16:26, June 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok so I am going to try and keep this brief but I will explain my oppostion in a way that is coherent as possible. First, I challenge people to think to themselves of one thing that Wild had done since joining the wiki, without checking his user page first. If you are able to think of anything, its probably Land of Empires (I asked the users on chat and this is also what I got). So when evaluating my vote, I went to check Land of Empires. If you pull up this page, there is some troubling things here. First and foremost there has been little progress, but secondly, the main page admits that there will be inconsistancies in the timeline. Now none of this is to undermine Wild's contributions, but there have been users who have done far, far more for the wiki and have been rejected. Three times at that (looking at Feud). Wild is a likeable and peaceful user, but those do not merit promotion to the TSTPF. #PraiseRoosevelt. 02:15, June 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, a little bit of administrative direction here.  First, Wild has not posted a defense as to why she has accepted the nomination.  Second, UR did not include the date on his nomination.  It is better to use the built in signature format (four tildes), especially in these cases.  No voting should have begun without Wild actually accepting by posting reasons why she wants the position.  As far as the objections, to object a nominee because a "better" candidate did not get elected in the past, imho, is rather lame.  The objectors casting "no" votes for "chat admin" have entered the wrong "voting booth"  In closing, until Wild formally accepts the nomination with a public statement, she is not on the ballot and the time limit is not in force. --SouthWriter (talk) 16:41, June 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * I hereby officially accept the nomination for the constable.  23:05, June 16, 2016
 * There you have it, folks. Voting is now officially started. Tell us why you want the job, Wild. --SouthWriter (talk) 04:32, June 17, 2016 (UTC)
 * First off I don't understand any of the objectors reasons for why wild hasn't been a mod. One of the reasons wild says stuff not appropriate for mods so what? I have seen numerous TSPTF members often say very inappropriate stuff and insult users and wild rarely does this with the image being a regular example. Secondly not nomming wild because fires wasn't nominated is an idiotic reason, that's like saying you don't want a xbox because you couldn't get a Play station and besides these reasons no users have stated their qualms with wild as an user which is on of the few users who doesn't start flame wars and generate trash on chat, and has proven his effectiveness as a mod on his other wikis. Blason_comte_fr_Anjou.svg By the grace of god Count of maine, Forcalquier, Anjou, and Provence, prince of albania and his highness the dauphin of France Belial.  03:12, June 17, 2016 (UTC)
 * It seems that we have a tie if we consider all votes valid and let them stand. We have plenty of time, though. I think we have to verify those objectors that don't know what we're voting on. --SouthWriter (talk) 04:32, June 17, 2016 (UTC)

Reximus55
Rex is an experienced, active, and good contributor to our wiki. He has something around 20,000 edits, and has been on the wiki since 2013. He is good at keeping the wiki organized, and has categorized and spell checked a fair amount of pages. He has modded many map games, most recently Game of Nations and Principia Moderni 4. Overall, he is a great user, and helps make this wiki a fun place to be on. For those reasons, I think he should be awarded the position of constable.




 * Supporters
 * First supporter here
 * Objectors
 * Crim - 10/10 - IGN 17:57, June 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * -- 18:55, June 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * Discussion
 * I would like to thank Fires for the nomination, accept, and outline the reasons why I believe I would make a fine community servant as a TSPTF'er. In the past, when a nomination to the TSPTF faced me (both times which I declined), I thought of it as a way to gain more power. That is the wrong mindset to have going into this office, and I now realize just how much it is about being a servant to others on the wiki. I've attempted to help others in a much deeper capacity in recent times and I believe I've also grown more mature from when I joined many years ago. I believe that, as a TSPTF member, I can help speak for the community as well as continue to perform regular fixes to our community. As you all know, I've been on crusades against improper grammar/spelling (not on Eoguy proportions, but still) and against categorization which go against the Wiki Rules. I humbly ask for your vote so that I can represent you at the TSPTF level. Thank you once again. I'd also be more than willing to address any concerns that may be raised in potential opposition. 17:57, June 23, 2016 (UTC)

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor so long as they accept the nomination.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also have not had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Rules

 * Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (Please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he or she wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.
 * They are a Lieutenant.
 * They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a three-fourths super majority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a three-fourths super majority for nomination to be accepted.
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Impeachment
It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

 * User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
 * If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment, with support of at least one TSTPF member.
 * Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
 * Registered users' votes must have two-third super majority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-third super majority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons
There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:
 * They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
 * They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
 * They have have not been fair, restrained and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
 * They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

Note: One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.

Current Impeachments
===Name of TSPTF member===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.