User talk:IndigoOnIceCream



Warning
As a new editor, I understand it may be intriguing to have the badge system, however according to this, "Unconstructive contributions and edits made only to get badges will not be tolerated. Editors suspected of editing for this reason will be warned first and then blocked from editing if they continue." This is your warning. If you make edits such as the ones you have made on 1983DD just to get a badge, or making blogs, commenting on blogs, etc., you will be blocked from editing on this wiki for an allotted amount of time. ChrisL123 00:59, September 18, 2011 (UTC)

Leave one more post anywhere that is spam, or for badges, and you are getting blocked. For quite a while. Lordganon 07:25, September 18, 2011 (UTC)

If you ever remove a warning and related posts from your page like that again, it will be a month. Lordganon 00:00, October 7, 2011 (UTC)

Excuse me? You honestly left a post like that on my page when I added a category to a page? Just how badly to you want to get blocked?

If I ever find you doing that again, you will be.

I'm not going to leave you any more warnings. Any more violations of any kind and it's a block.

Lordganon 00:15, October 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * Uh, yeah, what he said. All I did was add the category to the page. You never told me once not to edit your page, and it isn't against the rules. What is against the rules is another user adding any additional information that was not given permission to by the author. ChrisL123 00:25, October 11, 2011 (UTC)

Quit spamming. Seriously, you know better. Your behavior lately is wrong, and I'm tired of it. One more tiny bit and you're gone for a week. Lordganon 04:19, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

Re: HOW?
Hello there. Are you 76.21.104.140? If you are, I am sorry to say this, but I have protected the talk page from anonymous users and newly registered users. This is because I feel I have been being harassed and pestered by 76.21.104.140. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 04:30, September 18, 2011 (UTC)

I have had enough
I have had enough of your disrespect and harassment. You continue to note me on every, little thing; You are talking to me like I am just a puppet for you to turn this timeline around in your image; and you continue to harass me even after myself and other have told you to stop. I am sorry to have to do this, but I am going to be blocking you for a week. I will hope that this will help you understand that this is a community, not your castle. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 20:55, September 18, 2011 (UTC)

Re: My Apology
Thank you so much. I accept your apology. I too need to apologize to you. I didn't want to block you, but I felt it was the only option at the time. I really hope I didn't make you loose interest in the timeline. I know your heart is in the right place, you just need to know how to construct it (if that makes any sense). Plus, harassing and pestering isn't a good way to do this XD

I know I stated this timeline is open, but not in the manner as you have been doing prior. The only way I can explain it is... you see a cake at your friends house, and they say "help yourself." Do you really think they want you to eat two-thirds of the cake? I know a hypothetical situation isn't a good analogy, but that is the only think I can think of.

Too answer your questions:


 * 1) The main reason I removed it was out of spite. This wasn't good of me to do, and I will revert it ASAP. But need to get a better understanding of it before I make it canon.
 * 2) You can call this 100% my fault. I never read the rules either, so I had no idea Wikipedia copy and pasting wasn't allowed XD

Again, I really hope I didn't make you loose interest in the timeline. I will also be removing the block on the talk page, but I am keeping the block on the main page (until its time runs out). I blocked it not just of your actions, but because the page was getting too many edits from other users. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 23:51, September 26, 2011 (UTC)

For the record, if I see any of that stuff out of you again, the block will be a lot longer than what Nuke gave you. Lordganon 00:13, September 27, 2011 (UTC)

United Democracies
No on all counts. There's a reason why it works in the President McCain article, which is not applicable in New Union. Lordganon 23:00, September 29, 2011 (UTC)

There's no reason for it, at all. At about 5:50 Server Time it will likely fix itself. Give it time, I guess. Lordganon 23:29, September 29, 2011 (UTC)

Stuff
I know you don't want anybody commenting on your section in the main talk page until it is complete. I hope you don't mind if I write you here. Overall, I love it. Very detailed, and pretty accurate for what I have had in mind all along. I only have two things I need to state:


 * 1) I would like to stress out that the CSTO is in no way a "Reborn Warsaw Pact." It began as a military cooperation between the Soviet Union and Armenia. Georgia and Mongolia will join later on, but it won't expand beyond that. After doing research on it, I have decided to make Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, and Albania as observers (rather than members). I know that you are keen on the expansion of the CSTO, but I can't see it expanding beyond the four member that are in place.
 * 2) Abortion illegal? Is this your personal opinion, or can you show me an article that shows this becoming a fact, or a quote that Gorbachev supported the abolishment of abortion? I am not an expert on the issue, but I am pro-choice, and Russia is in OTL. I dough the USSR would be too different from OTL Russia. Despite the fact that religious beliefs are becoming more widespread across the USSR, I would believe they would continue to have a secular view on these manners (as in OTL).

Other than those two, keep up the great work. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 18:34, October 4, 2011 (UTC)

Categorization
You have no right to complain about other users following wiki policy by placing your articles into the correct categories (as you did to ChrisL123 and Lordganon when they added categories to the article "Think Before You Enact"); and you certainly can't accuse people of not following the rules when you are the one violating wiki conventions and they are only fixing your mistake.

You can control the content of your Timelines, but if you aren't following wiki policy, then other users have the right to edit your articles to fix that.

Mister Sheen 13:50, October 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * Don't worry about it, it wasn't a major infraction like using a sockpuppet or anything. Just remember to stick to the policies (they really aren't so bad), and if you do have any disputes, try to at least stay courteous, and you'll do fine. The fact that you apologized shows a lot – plenty of people would just have kept on flaming and gotten themselves banned. - Mister Sheen 18:20, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

Apologies mean little if similar actions continue to repeat themselves.

There is no need to respond to apologies.

Past that, you've been warned. And won't be getting another.

Lordganon 08:40, October 17, 2011 (UTC)

Yank
User:Yankovic270 is the controller of Vietnam. LurkerLordB 23:49, October 18, 2011 (UTC)

We
RWG, you were told by RvB to not touch it. To quote him: "So you are more than welcome, in fact I encourage, to suggest additions to the timeline or comment on what would likely happen next. You can even propose whole additions...but I'm kind of tentative to accept another person on as a contributor, if you can understand"

That is not permission to do anything at all to it.

Lordganon 00:43, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

Hi
Hi - my old McCain althist is pretty much abandoned by now, partly because I don't have time for it (I already focus on my Fall Grun and SIADD timeline when I get time to do anything). The New Union timeline looks interesting - I would perhaps like to do something to Czechoslovakia (my native country), as while my other native country Norway probably is the same as OTL, there is room in the former to do something, both politically (elections, politicians etc.) and culturally (sports - with the brilliance of Czech hockey players in the late 1990s and various points the 2000s, combined with Slovakia they would be a powerhouse like the Soviets, and the situation would look a bit like the Cold War, where the USSR and Czechoslovakia constantly fought for gold in the Olympics and World Championship).

--Realismadder 21:01, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

Principia Moderni
To conquer Kashmir you must withdraw to the area you control and then reattack in a few years. Also if Russia joins your side, Sweden and Denmark and their vassals will withdraw support as Russia is somewhat of an enemy to the Swedish interests. Scandinator

Did you realy want to invade Armenia? because Armenia is a puppet of Russia, the State I'm Controling. If you wanted someting from it then you could solve it diplomaticaly, but if you want a war its you choice, message me back in my talk page and label it Principia Moderni Persia please. thanks LxCaucassus 23:44, October 27, 2011 (UTC)

If you want armenia, I can solve that diplomaticaly. You shouldn't go on gian expansion sprees rightnow, you should focus more on modernizing your nation and making it more stable on 5 years so your overall power can increase and its easier to capture people. If i declare war on a Non-Player state, I'm almost guaranteed a win right now. TRy to recover militarily right now, then in 10-15 turns when your stability is higher, go for a war, and kick the hell out of your opponents!LxCaucassus 10:55, October 28, 2011 (UTC)

I suggest establishing colonies and taking on the Mughals ASAP to gain Hanthawaddian trade. Currently to survive economically you are relying on Russian and Chinese trade. Scandinator

Great Northern War( Principia Moderni)
Can you please Help me in this, If you dont I'll lose for sure but if you do help me I can win it and you can have parts of Armenia as compensation(I did help you conquer Kashmir, after All)LxCaucassus 17:55, October 30, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, Sweden does have a colony in IndiaLxCaucassus 18:21, October 30, 2011 (UTC)

Look at the External Territories page, that should show how many colonies they have unless they forgot to put someLxCaucassus 18:39, October 30, 2011 (UTC)

NOTE: Sweden helped to force Vietnam to stop the planned invasion of Persia and was the FIRST person to help in Kashmir. Scandinator

Sorry, but that is the way it is in wars on PM. Just declare neutrality.Scandinator

Axis vs Alies alies
Welcome! I would not minde if we restarted it. It became a bit ASB, but we could try and re-lanch it. Add a post today!86.29.69.146 15:53, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Look through the history and archives. Have fun, think war and economics. Usual rules of map games apply. 86.29.69.146 (AKA-Billy) 15:55, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

With wars write as plausible type of assult and enamy responce, then do what you want there after with the captured land. 86.29.69.146 17:01, November 1, 2011 (UTC) (AKA Billy)

AvAr Japanese Mexico
The URA would probably be able to squash the whole of Japanese Mexico, not just 1 base (attack the whole colony). America and Venezuela were very developed and merged in to a superpower. Japan had apparently neglected it's American holdings in Mexico in favor a war to annex Malaya. 86.29.69.146 (AKA-Billy) 15:55, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for joining the game.82.11.96.210 (AKA-Billy) 12:30, November 3, 2011 (UTC)

Just say you have finaly over-run Japanese Mexico and it's yours. I think Japan's user has quit, so it's easy pickings!82.14.49.186 03:37, November 5, 2011 (UTC)

Francaphone activity is opened up in Hindu held Yeman, :-)82.11.87.156 03:13, November 6, 2011 (UTC)

I'm sending troops to your aid.86.29.76.198 17:36, November 6, 2011 (UTC)AKA Billy

Return of the Kennedys
I have been busy lately..

I was begganing to be conviced that Return of the Kenndyies was implausible.. Thanks for your interest however,

you can start by adding descriptions to the 1984/1988 Elections.

Alexanders 23:42, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

I will get back to work on it too.

Expanding into India
The time is ripe. India is weakened by 3 years of famine. I suggest conquering Multan in 1706, Sindh in 1708, Rajputs in 1710, Gujrat is 1712 and finally Malwa in 1714 with knocking each out it one year and then developing your military. You have enough power to achieve this. Also Sweden can support you if you need it. This process will give you all the North Indian states by 1714. For the Muhals just jump on the bandwagon. Scandinator 05:26, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

Re: I finaly made my choice
thanks alot, i will sends some spetsnaz to help you(some of them will attack sweden and some will aid, sweden is my main concern now)LxCaucassus 22:06, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

Well attacking India evokes a second algorythm in which you will surely lose. Return the colony or else I will have to launch a full sale invasion of Southern Persia.Scandinator 04:52, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

I am a ally of both Sweden and Russia, but sometimes i tend to support Russia more.and i entered briefly on the war, but left.--Collie Kaltenbrunner 07:16, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

Sweden will return relations back to status quo if Persia supports Sweden against Russia in the next war. Also if you support a nation the other foe usually does not invade.Scandinator

re: HELLO THERE!!!!!!!!!
Well, thank you for your appreciation of CYOAH; it was designed to be a fun little thing that the entire community could support.

As for your new Alternate History, China's Decision, would you mind providing me with a link if it has been started? I couldn't seem to find in the search.

Thank you for contacting me, and feel free to make your own additions to Choose Your Own Alternate History, as many paths in the different Points of Divergence's have yet to be explored!

Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 01:18, November 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, I will say it is an interesting concept, and, from my limited knowledge of Asian history (my area of expertise is Western History from 1800's to present), I would have to say the Point of divergence might have to go back a bit further than the mid-late 1800's, like when Japan decided to modernize. I would say sometime after the Opium wars (1840's) would be the better idea. Just my opinion, and I'm sure you can find other people who could help you more than I. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 03:09, November 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah, so you want to treat this as a CYOAH style timeline then? Hmmm... well, I would give the full blessing to you to do this, its just that their are already three still not yet fully developed ideas for CYOAH (and are on the main page). I was hesitant to just allow anyone to make a new idea for CYOAH, or else it would have ballooned the project to ridiculous heights, while at the same time insuring that none of them ever would be even somewhat developed, just like the Map Games when everybody here tried to make their own version, which resulted in so many different versions, and resulted in a lot of inactive and discontinued games that litter the Wikia (or have since been deleted). Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 14:12, November 6, 2011 (UTC)

Mughal Invasion
Lol not sure if you're prepared enough. You wanna start upgrading your military? I can weaken the Mughals at the borders. But you need to have a solid period of military expansion where there is no invasion whatsoever. Detectivekenny (Info; Talk) 18:52, November 5, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Napoleon's World Questions
Thank you for your interest in Napoleon's World!

To answer your questions:

1. Some countries (i.e. Denmark) were allies of Napoleon. Other parts of Europe were cumbersome to invade and control, such as Spain (mountains) and England (the channel). For the most part, Napoleon's empire stretches across the central European plain, which is easiest to travel across quickly and decisively. As for the Ottoman territories, again, mountains are cumbersome to cross, and in this TL his son does invade this territory and fails to capture it (See: War of Napoleonic Succession

2. Napoleon ceased his invasion of Russia as he advanced to the Urals and the difficulty associated with controlling wild Siberian territories beyond a high mountain range all the way from Paris or even Moscow when the people are mostly hostile

3. This is a good point I haven't thought too much about. I imagined a Russian survivor state in Siberia, as well as territories controlled by Alaska in Asia, and as you can see on the main map both Korea and Japan, as well as Persia, have absorbed considerable swaths of OTL Russian territory. This is something I would have to delve deeper into (or you, if you are interested in writing a history of Siberia and/or the fallen Russian Empire)

4. To an extent, yes, China does adopt some Western principles. France becomes an overland trading partner with Asia and there is no Opium War, and I imagined China's robust land trade with France results in technological trade. I'm not super familiar with Chinese history so the 19th century Chinese growth is a bit laggard, but there has been some established canon about China modernizing and westernizing in the first half of the 20th century (after a civil war from 1908-1917) to become a major power.

5. There are two reasons for the formation of Alaska. Most importantly, this is where hundreds of thousands, and eventually millions, of Alaskan refugees wind up. Secondly, the collapse of the British Empire leads to the partition of Upper and Lower Canada (Ontario and Quebec OTL) between the United States and France in the 1810's, but Rupert's Land and the HBC territories are less established in international law. The dispute over the Alaskan control of this territory leads to the Alaskan War, which is definitiely an article I recommend reading to get a sense of the TL's style.

6. I'm not completely sure what you mean by Pan-Americanism.

7. I always figured that Napoleon would be more concerned about controlling his European provinces than returning to Egypt. Besides, I have the Hapsburgs retreating to Egypt from Austria and forming their own short-lived state there in the early 1800's.

8. The Spanish colonies in Latin America eventually declare independence and are successful in these measures, breaking off from war-weary Spain in the late 1810's and early 1820's. Brazil peacefully splits from Portugal as in OTL. France absorbs some territory, but the colonialism of OTL is nowhere near as prevalent. England and Ireland compete for overseas influence, but the English are unable to completely conquer India, focusing their energies on Australia and Indonesia and Southern Africa.

9. Communism and Socialism do occur, but not nearly as prevalently as in OTL, and the Cold War is not a standoff between capitalism and communism. For the most part, Communism fails as an economic theory in the west by the late 1950's (due to England's civil war, called the Anarchy) and the communist regimes in Spain and Chile have failed by the end of the 1980's.

10. French naval power would have grown eventually, but again, Turkey controls the East Mediterranean, there are Hapsburg runt states in Libya and Egypt, and Spain controls Morocco. From southern France, Algeria and Gibraltar Napoleon would have control over most of the Mediterranean. France also develops a significant presence in West Africa.

11. No, not really. The Americans fight a much longer war at home against the Mexicans (a war fought on their own soil) and against Alaska (also fought on American land). America's overseas influence is still seen, but they do not capture any colonies per se while still exercising their might in Hawai'i, Vietnam, and Latin America.

12. I haven't thought of that yet. That portion is unwritten as of now. Thank you for pointing that out.

13. India never fell under control of England. Bengal was influenced by England and is an independent state. France colonized southern Pakistan and western India to form the colony of French Hindustan. Northern India is a Hindu-dominated county known as Gangestan, and southern India is a Muslim-dominated kingdom called Mysore and Hyderabad, the OTL name of the Kingdom in that area pre-British mandate.

14. To the same extent they did in this TL. Japan is well on its way to becoming a world power before the 1920's in this TL.

15. The technology is roughly analogous to OTL, though I often picture it being a year or two behind (f.ex. the iPhone released in 2009 instead of 2007, the smart phone revolution only now beginning).

16. There are multiple pages dedicated to popular culture (film, music, television, sports) in this TL. I'm a football fanatic so I've devoted a lot of energy to that. The Media and Sports categories are thorough in this regard.

17. There is one world war, called the Pacific War, in the 1920's. France fights a civil war roughly based on the European portions of WWII.

18. This is a difficult question since France has an all-mighty Emperor but a popularly elected legislature, and Japan is a military regime. Some former countries were dictatorships and no longer are. For the most part, I'd argue that the Cold War is defined more in terms of strategic interests and not "freedom"

19. It sure does! France reaches the moon first and America reaches Mars first. Owen Wilson is the first man on Mars.

20. Slavery dies a slow, long death. There is no civil war, but the economic benefit of slavery slowly vanishes thanks to an Industrial Revolution in many southern states. There is a compromise to phase slavery out (by grandfathering in current slaves) and eventually many southern states choose to abolish it. This may be optimistically positive on my part.

KingSweden 00:29, November 7, 2011 (UTC)

The answers to a lot of, if not most, of your questions can be found in the TL. There's 750 pages total, most of them cover a lot of the points you touched on. I also took some of your suggestions and created a few new pages to reflect some of the good points you brought up. The TL, of course, remains a work in progress.

KingSweden 19:07, November 10, 2011 (UTC)

The pages regarding the Suez/Sinai Canal and the Franco-Egyptian War are new, from what I remember. Umm sort of... I reserve the right to change/tweak/delete things I don't agree with/don't fit canon, and I usually prefer that people leave me suggestions on my talk page. Thats what Yankovic270 does, and he's contributed a lot of very good ideas to the TL, and I find a way to incorporate almost everything he suggests in one form or another. So in the classical sense, no, it isn't totally open. Pages like Alternate Destinies (Napoleon's World), Film (Napoleon's World) and Television (Napoleon's World) are more open-ended though, I usually don't turn into a TL-Nazi over those three.

KingSweden 15:28, November 11, 2011 (UTC)

AvA(r)
Honestly, the American's 20kt warheaded Honest John missile would be of use against your enamies in Mexico.86.29.76.198 01:47, November 7, 2011 (UTC)

I am still in alliance with the URA and Hindustan, so my atacks are only on Japanes troops, not Hindustanies unless provoked.82.11.108.217 (AkA Billy) 02:12, November 8, 2011 (UTC)

The 2nd Pluton missile is to be launched.82.11.108.217 02:16, November 8, 2011 (UTC)

French responce: Yes, the 40,000 French troops and 4 Pluton missiles in México are made available to any planed URA liberation planed for Hawaii. 02:35, November 9, 2011 (UTC)(AKA Billy)

Europe
Laptop Zombie wrote a bizzar rambleling poast clamed half the world was to be Soviet, Baltic or French. I was confused. He then made a map in which he swindled him self out of Transdanubia, Polish Galicia and part of Greece. Oxfordshire 1972 then enlarged the map. I think that is what happend to your European territories82.18.196.173 03:26, November 10, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Two Things

 * The reason I didn't mention the other nations is because there is no need for change. Either they are already moving towards reforms (like Vietnam and Laos) or there is no way for them to change in ttl without major ASB (China and North Korea). While I am not going to deny that I am intrigued at the idea of change in the PRC and the DPRK... we already have a consensus on the timeline... no major changes. The only way I would support any change is if LG goes with it.
 * Again... the Middle East is not going to change from what has been set up already. Plus... the fact that the USSR begins closer cooperation with Israel is MORE LIKELY to prevent any conflict (with the backing of both superpowers... it's pretty much just walking into a shooting range).
 * Nothing against the guy, but I never heard about Bao Tong until you have brought him up. I believe you mentioned him before. Again, nothing against him... but I dough he would be able to do anything. If you think this guy can do more than OTL, than why not design your own where he is successful.
 * Like I mentioned before... unless LG likes the idea... I am not going to be considering a second Korean War.
 * Both of those suggestions are ASB to me, and make no sense.

I would also like for you to leave my other timelines alone. I do not want you to be nominating any of them. Especially if you find my work "crazy"!!! --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 03:57, November 8, 2011 (UTC)

PM Algorythms
Please leave them to me. If you require an algorythm done just ask on my talk page.Scandinator 01:57, November 13, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Thank You
You're always welcome. The algorithms in fact have several errors, so judging by the above post, Scandinator will edit them for you. But I truly hope that you will decide that expansion is not what this game is about. For a fact, you are very soon in line to industrialize, so I would start modernizing and preparing. Honestly there is not much you will get out of Indian kingdoms that you do not have in your own country. Detectivekenny (Info; Talk) 03:56, November 13, 2011 (UTC)

Check out my post in AvAr. Doctor261 15:23, November 13, 2011 (UTC)

AvAr
A few countries have broken off from the URA, please don't try to conquer them again as this will tax your army to the limit. The new countries will attract new players. However, do try to liberate a few african colonies so you could form the United States of Libera!! ;) Imperium Guy 22:47, November 13, 2011 (UTC)

Tnak you very much. I would advise you to take over Quebec as otherwise it could turn communist!! :/ Imperium Guy 12:33, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

FTBW Answers
Well, all the questions you just asked have been questions that have been asked of me before regard French Trafalgar, British Waterloo. However, I will answer them again for you:


 * 1. The Battle of Trafalgar took place in October of 1805, long after Napoleon had already given up on trying to pull the Royal Navy away from the English Channel, and had already sent most of the "Army of England" eastward toward Austria to battle with the continental allies of Britain; Austria and Russia. That battle was three-four months too late, as the English Channel would have become nearly impossible for crossing with a large army: Even Hitler faced this problem in 1940, as September was determined to be the last month possible to cross before winter storms would have devastated the invasion. So, even if Napoleon wanted to, the weather, having the troops committed elsewhere and, even more simply, the fact that there where still many ships of the Royal Navy, just spread all over the globe at that time, prevented him from acting on the victory.


 * 2.Most of the battles Napoleon fought after 1805 was mostly to keep his "allies" and the different protectorates he had under control, and to enforce the "Continental System," a blockade against England. That is the reason he invaded Spain in 1808, and then Russia in 1812: to try to starve out England (though this failed miserably, as even the French Army couldn't do away without British products, being the "workhouse of the world"). So, peace with England in 1806, and then finally finishing off against Austria, Russia and Prussia by 1807, would mean he would have no other reason to invade anyone else, nor enforce a blockade with Britain.


 * 3.Yes, France does have large colonial ambitions. Napoleon was always a restless warrior, but with peace in Europe after 1806-1807, he couldn't direct his energies against the other European powers as they would all eventually gang up on France of which he would be the ultimate loser. Therefore, focusing on colonies gave him an excuse to send the army to Africa and Asia, which in turn would increase his power in Europe to eventually be able to rival the other powers.


 * 4. China will westernize sooner than OTL, but it will take a serious drubbing in the 1840's by an allied Britain and France (and, no, that alliance does not last long) to force them to realize, but even then major industrilization will not take place until the later part of the 1870's-1880's, by which time Japan would have already had a huge lead, and Russia, having industrialized earlier as well, would be able to still take chunks of China at will.


 * 5.Yes, but it will take almost another decade, as, without the crisis of the Peninsular War in 1808 distracting Spain, the Spanish will be able to keep a closer eye on the colonies. But it will happen, just it will be almost 10-15 years later than in OTL.

And, like I said before, I would rather that the other TL's be worked on first before starting yet another one. There are already three CYOAH's, but two of them had almost no work done on them. I'm afraid your idea will be just the same as them. If more work can be done on CYOAH, then I will gladly let you start another one. But right now, I'm still saying no.

Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 01:22, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

Revolutions 1750
I'm trying to get the game off the ground. I'm gonna ask some people to join the game. It's a pretty interesting map game. I really hope it picks up. Just remember that I'm keeping a leash on this. Moderators will be given Delete on Sight powers on implausible actions, the algorithms will be stricter, and so on and so forth. I don't want this to turn into one of those implausible map games. Once it gets implausible, I tend to leave for a while.

Anyway, feel free to log on and have fun! CrimsonAssassin 03:42, November 22, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Nasser of Arabia
Funny you should bring it up (been thinking about it lately). The timeline was actually the first timeline I posted here. In a nutshell, it is a timeline where Syria decides to rejoin the (rather than remain independent), which leads to the entire Arab World being united under a single nation. I removed the timeline when I continued to run into ASBs in my series of events, as well as more of it being ruined with Arab Spring events of OTL. I have been doing more research on the matter, working on again, off again. I do have some intentions to bring the timeline back, but only if I can figure out how it can work without being too much of an ASB. I have several ideas, but I am keeping them to myself for now.

As for NU, I already replied to the most recent talk... days ago. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 01:48, November 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * What posts? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 03:34, November 29, 2011 (UTC)

First off, I can't believe you just got LG involved. For your information, I was the one who deleted the timeline, because I thought it was too ASB (not someone else removing it on me). Secondly, I never said I was bringing it back, but that I had intentions to MAYBE bring it back. Like I said, there are still bugs to work out. As for your questions about the timeline, I can't answer them, for the same reason I just wrote. I am honored that you like the idea, and I am happy that you have encouraged me to dig it up again, but let's take it one step at a time. K? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 03:52, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

RWG, you need to learn to mind your own business. At this time, you have nothing to do with such a project. Don't try to pretend that you do. Lordganon 08:23, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

Timelines
No, not really. Mitro 18:55, December 1, 2011 (UTC)

You have two seconds to explain why did you delete the "Autumn" and un-strike me voiding the situation with Canada. Doctor261 (Talk to Doctor!) 08:14, December 4, 2011 (UTC)

Alright then, we're cool. Doctor261 ''' (Talk to Doctor261) 04:23, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

Napoleon's World College Football Pick'em 2011
It's that time of year again! Time for the annual Napoleon's World college footbal bowl picks. For each game, pick which team you want to win and the results will be used to determine the winner of each bowl in January!

National Championship (Rose Bowl): 2 Cuba Spaniards (13-0) vs. 1 Pacifica Orcas (13-0)

Texas Bowl: (6) Alabama Crimson Tide (11-1) vs. (5) Iowa Hawkeyes (12-1)

Orange Bowl: (17) Peninsula Raptors (10-2) vs. (7) Florida State Seminoles (11-1)

Silver Bowl: (11) Washington Huskies (10-2) vs. (4) Sequoyah Braves (12-1)

Sugar Bowl: (14) Eastern New York Flying Dutchmen (10-2) vs. (3) Mississippi Falcons (12-1)

Peach Bowl: (16) Virginia Cavaliers (10-3) vs. (10) LSU Tigers (11-2)

Chicago Bowl: (12) Louisiana Pelicans (10-2) vs. (13) Michigan State Spartans (11-2)

Manhattan Bowl: (20) Notre Dame Fighting Irish (9-3) vs. (8) Massachusetts Minutemen (10-2)

Paradise Bowl: (9) San Diego Tritons (12-1) vs. (18) Northern Colorado Billy Goats (11-1)

Citrus Bowl: (15) Montana State (11-2) vs. (16) Nova Scotia (10-2)

KingSweden 22:23, December 4, 2011 (UTC)

Think before You Enact
Yes, I have few questions though: Enclavehunter 23:06, December 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) How did this effect the rest of the world
 * 2) What happens to Asia
 * 3) Did World War 1 and World War 2 occur.

I got a think about it?Enclavehunter 23:46, December 4, 2011 (UTC)

Napoleon's World Talk Page
Ah yes. I usually don't check that talk page, to be honest, so if you have TL suggestions for me my user talk page works best, since I get updates everytime there's a comment there. China's modernization doesn't occur until after the turn of the 20th century in this TL, by which time Siberia is an established state, but the Pacific War is waged largely over China's desires to conquer the exact territory you are indicating.

KingSweden 23:07, December 4, 2011 (UTC)

Napoleon's World Talk Page
I almost never check the Napoleon's World page, so sorry if it's taken me a while to get back to you on that. The best way to reach me with ideas/suggestions/critiques is usually my user talkpage, which I check almost daily. I believe the Pacific War settled all territorial designs on southern Siberia by the Chinese, who did not begin to modernize until the 1910's and after, due to their Civil War.

KingSweden 23:09, December 4, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Asia
Chiang Kai Shek - a possible Chinese general and military leader in the Pacific War and the post-war recovery period, a great modernizer, anti-Communist and de facto leader of China during Second Sino-Japanese War

Sun-Yat Sen - a possible general and political ally of the Constitutional Imperialists during the Chinese Civil War

Hideki Tojo - a Shogun in the 1930's and early 1940's maybe, later replaced by Yamamoto

Mohadmas Gandhi - good question, since there isn't the same British influence in India during this time

Jackie Chan - Chinese 20th century intellectual, author and critic of the Imperial regime; currently living in exile in the United States for his opinions

Deng Xiaoping - Chinese military commander and top government official and advisor to Emperor Pujie during various international conflicts, like in Burma, Vietnam, and Siam from the 1970's through the 1990's

Hirohito - the Japanese royal line would be unbroken regardless, so he is still Emperor from 1926-1989

Hu Jintao - Chinese businessman and oil tycoon, maybe?

King Abdullah - If you are referring to the King of Jordan, he would be the King of Syria, where I have transplanted the Hashemite dynasty. If you are referring to the King of Saudi Arabia, then he is likely the king still until he is overthrown and Arabia becomes a republic and later an Islamic Caliphate (I obviously still need to embellish this in writing)

Chulalongkorn - still King of Siam, keeping it safe from those greedy Europeans just like OTL (maybe with Siam developing into a much more influential regional player though, and setting up its eventual allegiance with the United States prior to the Pacific War)

Corazon Aquino - maybe a Filipino resistance leader against the Japanese?

As for most Asian monarchs (including in Vietnam, Cambodia and Siam) I generally decided to keep them in power up until the 1960's or 1970's, when various anti-monarchical revolutions begin (opposed and pushed by the French, depending on geopolitical alignment).

And as for Siberia, I don't recall China being particularly expansionist in the early 19th century, or having particularly strong relations with the Europe. By the time China was in a position to invade Siberia, the Siberian state would likely have become fully formed. However, you will notice that China in this TL is already much larger than in OTL.

KingSweden 05:41, December 6, 2011 (UTC)

Re: UAR State Flags
Thank you, but I already have ideas for flags (just need to upload them, you know XD). But if you don't mind me asking, where did you find the flags for Saoura and Khaleej? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 00:49, December 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * ... Where did you type them in? --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 01:51, December 7, 2011 (UTC)

Reply
Thanks for the encouragements... :) As for the TSPTF, I guess i never really thought of it :) PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 22:48, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Harassment
First off, stay off of my homepage. Bad enough I have you pestering me here, I don't need it there. Comment here, I believe you are still allowed to on your talk page.

Recently, you have:


 * 1) Continued to make pointless and obviously unresearched proposals to a timeline which we have told you time and time again was not working in that direction.
 * 2) Pestered me about an old timeline, and decide to put yourself in working on it without my permission.
 * 3) Went behind my back and got LG involved in a discussion that was only between us.
 * 4) Speaking on my behalf, telling LG that I wanted to bring back a timeline which I never said I was going to at that moment.
 * 5) Reverted my edits you had no purpose or permission to do so, and than justify it by questioning why it was hidden.

And that is only what you have been doing to pester me. I can't imagine what else you could have done. LG and I have been telling you time and time again that you were on thin ice, and you still went there. At this point, I have lost all of my patience with you, and highly dough that you are capable of learning from your mistakes. I for one support LG for blocking you, and you should be thankful that you are not permanently blocked.

Wait out your two weeks. If by than you want to come back, I prey you look before you leap, or I will be the one to permanently ban you from here. I know you want to be friendly with me, but you need to learn from your mistakes. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 05:01, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

In addition.....

Add to that all of the stuff you pulled with Owen - harassing him on a wiki he admins, and acting like you have a position on this one. And, giving us a bad name with another group of admins is a bad thing, even that bunch. And, to go even further, trying to get the admins to remove a block of that nature.

A permanent block would a be stretch, but if you pull any of this stuff again, it will be longer, by far.

Lordganon 06:32, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Please forgive me. I was not trying to harass you, but somehow, what I did what I thought was not harrassing was harrassing. I am trying to be nice to you, but what I did I was not aware it was bad.
 * 1) Sorry about those ideas. You didn't have to accept them.
 * 2) I did not work on the timeline. I was letting you take the lead. Beside, I was just backing you up.
 * 3) Sorry about that. The reason I did it was because you greatly relied on LG for help, so I thought I bring help over.
 * 4) Forgive me. It was an honest mistake.
 * 5) Sorry. I did not know I was not allowed to do that. (At least you could have put a notice there).

All of that is for you Nuke, an for LG:

I swear I will never talk about Owen ever again nor harrass him. LG, I promise you that I will not stain the wiki's reputation ever again. And about the incident between the admins of the two wikis, is it the first time it has ever happen to this wiki?

P.S.: I needed to do some updates on my Map Game section on my user page. I will be quitting SPQR and States of America 3. Also, I will need someone to temporarily take control of the nations I play in the other map games until I come back.

RandomWriterGuy 03:35, December 12, 2011 (UTC)

China on GE is mine for caretaking :D Imperium Guy 10:33, December 12, 2011 (UTC)

LG, Nuke, what is your response? I kindly ask to here it. RandomWriterGuy 03:44, December 16, 2011 (UTC)

I am still waiting for my response. RandomWriterGuy 23:29, December 16, 2011 (UTC)


 * This is the only time I am going to tell you, you were blocked for harassment. I don't care what it is called, but you noting me on my other wikia accounts would be considered super harassment. I have no response other than what I told you before, serve your two weeks. If you harass me again on another wikia account of mine, I will double the time you are blocked. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 01:14, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Please Listen
I have been trying to forgive you for a while now. You have said this to me countless times, becoming a broken record.


 * 1) First off, I have nothing against making ideas. I am only getting tired of hearing them over and over again. For instance, I love burgers, but you don't see me eating a McDonald's out of house and home. If you want my advice, do more research on the matter before posting it, and keep the ideas limited to one topic at a time. As for earlier, I was hopeful to get a new face on the timeline, and hoped you would eventually learn what the timeline is and isn't. But after so many failed attempts, blocks, and warnings; you seem to not want to cooperate with others. I am a very nice guy, and I always treat other the way I would want to be treated. But after all that has happened, I am exhausted and have had enough of playing "Mommy" to you.
 * 2) I have no idea what you are talking about. But either way, it didn't feel like that.
 * 3) Yes... I rely on LG for a lot. He is an expert on a lot more than I could imagine I can do. But he is not the "ruler" of me. I can make decisions on my own. But besides the point... I am more enraged that you when behind my back and got him involved. I never gave permission, and that is a HUGE insult to me.
 * 4) Sure
 * 5) I DID PUT A NOTICE ON IT... maybe the fact that I HID IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That was the last straw for me, and I am still very angry that you did that. This just proves to me that you have no respect for my work, and just want to do it your way.

After reading that you want to not work with me... at this point I say good riddance!!! But I am not that type of person, and I don't want you to think negatively about me, as I don't want to think negatively about you. But if you want my advice, do what I did when I first started off here. Work on your own timelines. They are 100% your ideas, and you absolutely can't get in trouble for that. Come back when you think you are ready to work with others and listen. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 02:28, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

What he said. And a lot of that applies for the things you've done with regards to the wiki in general. Lordganon 02:44, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

Adoption
Can I adopt your Think Before You Enact TL? Enclavehunter 05:56, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

BTW, I read your new TL. It's looks like its going to be good. And Good Luck on it. Enclavehunter 08:09, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

HR
I remember you had shown some interest in my only TL, Hindustani Raj. Well, you asked me how India was going to look and I think somewhat like this:

How is that? :D Imperium Guy 09:35, December 25, 2011 (UTC)

Here is how I hope to make the modern map of Southern Asia:

What do you think as I hope to make Asian history go on a different path. Your opinion? :D Imperium Guy 07:50, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

Think Before You Act
I do like it, the POD is clearly well-thought out. I don't know if I have time to contribute though, I barely have enough time for NW as it is. I'm more focused on my other writing projects these days.

KingSweden 21:06, December 25, 2011 (UTC)

I like it, the POD is clear and well-though out. If you need help, just ask me. Good Luck. Enclavehunter 21:04, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, my bad. Yeah it looks good. Enclavehunter 21:42, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

I don't see any thing ASB. Good luck, and if you need help, just ask. =) Enclavehunter 22:08, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

you may be a mod and mapmaker on my new map game (american empire), if you wish.

DeanSims 22:00, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

Whare is Shazrur?Saamwiil 01:15, December 29, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Think Before You Act
Hello RWG,

You've done quite a lot of writing in a short time. I am impressed, and the quality isn't half bad. Good job so far!

I don't have much time to spend here, but I'll assist you if and when I can do so.

As preliminary advice, you may want to compress the timeline in terms of your writing. Not that detail should be removed, but adapt the headings and organization to make the writing less dense and the division by dates more obvious. And a short introduction to the timeline on the page would draw more positive attention to the page.

Feel free to ask me to look at your work, and I'll get to it when I have the time

Cheers

Red VS Blue 04:41, December 31, 2011 (UTC)

You are banned
You can't edit Principia Moderni from 1667 to 1669, the next turn you will be able to edit is 1670. LurkerLordB 00:30, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

FTBW Plans
At the moment, I really don't know what to do. I'm sorta going by the seat of my pants here now for everything past 1999, just trying to write in things that make sense and can help to support the past and the future of the story.

The "Liberation Wars" after the September 10, 1999 attacks will continue to drag on in various forms through out Sorelist France and Japan, but at the moment I don't know exactly how that will play out. The Red Sea War, starting in 2002, will end in 2003, maybe 2004, but I believe I will have to add in a couple other conflicts in the Middle East to other parts of the story, especially in the 60's and 70's. Political scandal is going to rock Russia and America (Russia's has already been briefly outlined, but the US version has not yet). An economic depression, stemming from the combination of the Liberation Wars, the Red Sea War and other factors will strike before 2010, much like the current economic crisis in the world, though I have no idea how that is going to play out. However, the "Dual-Powers Conflict" will be virtually over soon, for reasons I do not wish to go into yet (because I'm waiting until after I get to the end of the actual "History" and reach the "present" to actually reveal it).

Also, work is starting to go into the many, numerous Red Links that abound throughout the timeline, as well as the need for more detail in many hastily created pages, including most of the nation's and all of the American Presidents, as well as other figures in the page. I'm still very far from done the story (if I ever will be), though the main basis of the story in the "expanded timeline" is nearly caught up to the present.

So, that is the current state of FTBW. If you would like to help out with something that interests you that has not been covered, or only briefly touched on, please let me know, and I can help set you guidelines for the general direction, as well as as of yet unpublished background material.

Thank you for your support for French Trafalgar, British Waterloo, and I hope you will enjoy the eventual result! Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 02:23, January 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * They could have, but the idea of trying to avoid "entangling alliances" was really the only reason why that America did not actively seek French help in the First American War. And, Napoleon, despite his restless nature, wouldn't have been able to do much anyway, as the Royal Navy then still was strong enough to block any attempt to reinforce the Americans by the French, despite Trafalgar. It therefore was, from the very beginning, a war between America and Britain alone. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 05:28, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Doomsday timeline

 * There are many areas of the planet which, although habitable, have not been written about (Africa mainly, but some parts of inland Asia, Europe/North America-not the nuked bits obviously) so you could start new nations there. Just remember the largest nations have already been written so the new nations would likely be small and tech poor.


 * There are some articles that are only stubs, you could ask to adopt these and expand them (just remember to follow adoption protocal).


 * Some of the editors have lots more than one article (i have several) they may be willing to 'foster out' an article to you rather than you adopt it fully.

just remember the rules -
 * If in doubt, it was nuked.
 * Radiation's a killer - so any major radiation - no nation in that area.
 * Dont use your hometown as a basis of a new nation.
 * Take into account any nearby nations, as if the lands habitable its likely its already theirs.
 * If you're thinking of setting up a nation near others, talk to the editors of those nations to agree plausablity and/or borders.

If in doubt ask on the DD talk page we're all happy to help--Smoggy80 12:18, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Alt Dest
I've always felt there was about a 60-40 split, but what did you have in mind?

KingSweden 20:51, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Also, typically important political types warrant their own article, as with US Presidents and various Prime Ministers and so on.

KingSweden 21:00, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Anarchy
Thank you, I'm glad you like it.

That's a good question. I think that by the 1950's, America is not seeking to expand land-wise and cause international criticism, or for that matter, to earn the ire of isolationists at home. I think I mention somewhere that Scotland was an ally of the United States (and if not, then I need to embellish it) and that stabilizing England would shore up their presence in Scotland. Also, by 1952 (when the first American soldiers are sent to Wales) there was interest by the Americans to play a geopolitical game with the French, and believed that maintaining a strong presence off the coast of France was critical to the evenness of the emerging Cold War, as France had Canada directly north of the United States.

Thanks for bringing that up! Got me thinking

KingSweden 01:27, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

Ireland is an ally of the French, if not their staunchest ally.

KingSweden 06:08, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

You mean unite with Scotland? (Ireland already controls Mann after all)

KingSweden 23:58, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

Hmm I suppose the (obviously failed) potential annexation of Wales could have been an Irish motivation for the invasion of Wales during the Anarchy, especially if they felt they deserved it after the Irish War but did not receive it in negotiations.

As for the second two, I think Scotland would have been too established as its own state and have too many potential allies for an Irish invasion (both the Americans and to a lesser extent the French), and the Scots would likely have resisted an Irish invasion even more fiercely than an anarchistic province like Wales. I'm not sure who Edward is, but if you're referring to Edmond, he lost the French Civil War to Sebastien, and whoever the victor of that conflict, no French emperor would ever, ever sell part of metropolitan France to anyone, even an ally. In my opinion.

I do like the idea of the dream of annexing Wales being Ireland's motivation for invading England in the 1950's, however.

KingSweden 00:05, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

I used your idea for a proposed Celtic Union Pan-Celtism. I liked the idea.

I don't think I have. Mister Sheen suggested (for irony's sake) making Rebecca Black a child piano or violin prodigy. I'm not much of a YouTuber anymore (though I did post some videos in high school) so I leave it to your discretion.

KingSweden 22:22, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Puissance Réelle
Hey RWG. I was wondering, if you would help me on my TL. In exchange, I'll help you on yours, if you need it? Enclavehunter 01:47, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I appreciate it, alot. : ) Enclavehunter 02:37, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Avaro
The game is starting now. Thanks for playing. PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 21:56, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Re: 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake
That's a good idea. Geological disasters would happen the same as OTL I figure. The Thai would be referred to as "Siamese" but other than that I like it. One possible suggestion for Oceania could be that the earthquake inadvertently shores up political support for Geoffrey Rush prior to the 2005 election, sort of how many natural or other disasters bring together people in a time of need (i.e. Japanese earthquake, 9/11, Katrina, so on)

KingSweden 00:44, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

Sounds good to me.

KingSweden 22:43, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

Because I'm ususally in a good mood. No smiley for serious issues though! ;D Imperium Guy 07:32, January 16, 2012 (UTC)

Cold War in FTBW
Yes their will be an end. When? I'm still keeping that under wraps. It will be soon, I believe, but I do have it planned out but I do not want to give it out sooner that the time for it to happen. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 14:07, January 16, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Tibet
I can't think of a better option, so I'll go with that. Thanks for the idea.

KingSweden 21:37, January 17, 2012 (UTC)

That's a good point. My thinking is that since Tibet is part of the Allied Powers in the Pacific War, it would have been a staging base for campaigns against China, and after the stalemate in 1929 the eventual Hilo Accords would have guaranteed Tibetan independence, and an American presence in Tibet after the war could have discouraged future Qing designs on the region. A Chinese invasion of northern and eastern Tibet could very well have been a byproduct of the war?

KingSweden 05:32, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Russia FTBW
I have given thought to this, and I have kinda developed something that I haven't fully explained yet. Starting in the 1980's, and reaching a peak in the early 2000's, the various groups inside Russia began clamoring for independence. The politicians in Russia knew they would have to hold these areas by force, so decided to offer them a version of "Home Rule" instead, similar to how the Dominion system worked in the British Empire in OTL. Basically, the various groups (Lithuanian, Latvian, Estonian, Ukrainian, White Russian, etc., etc.) where allowed to form National Assemblies that would have control over the local affairs of the area that had been decided to represent them. However, the military, Foreign Affairs and internal trade would be a purview of the government in Moscow. The Federal government also modified the structure of the

In the years of the Dual Power Conflict, this would be for the best in order to insure that France could not gain a foot hold in these national minorities. They do have self-government to a degree, and this might lead to more independence in the future. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 13:50, January 18, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, the thing about it is that Gorbachev is not President when the negotiations with the other states happened: he's been out of office for a few years, having served a couple terms as Russian President already. And what I sorta detailed to you allows the minority nations to remain part of Russia, but at the same time have control in internal matters. It's not perfect, but its better than allowing the Ukrainians, the Baltic States and White Russia to break away and build their own nation states. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 03:58, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Avaro
Well, the first thing is your invasion of the Netherlands, and Belgium's invasion. The UK and the Netherlands are very, very friendly, and the UK would never invade the Netherlands, and neither would Belgium. So I'm going to have to roll back all those posts, I'm afraid. . . PitaKang- (Talk | Contribs) 00:30, January 25, 2012 (UTC)

NW Version of Althistory Wiki
Can't help but notice your posts.

I'm going to tell you right now: This is not allowed, by and large.

And, another attempt to do things like this, and you're gone.

Lordganon 05:03, January 28, 2012 (UTC)

That you cannot figure out for yourself why such things are wrong is a great deal of why you've been blocked twice. Do the math. Lordganon 07:18, January 28, 2012 (UTC)

Do you mean the recent wiki activity feed, it's up in the right hand corner. Enclavehunter 02:39, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

I don't know, I created an page, and just kept adding parts to it. If you want it, I suggest try it on Think Before You Act TL, or something related to it.Enclavehunter 02:58, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Alaskan War
Help from who, exactly? Mexico is not an ally that would be interested in helping the United States in any way. Siberia would never go to war in the 1880's with a fellow Russian survivor state. France would probably have sold arms to the United States even though it was officially neutral, but France also sold weapons to Alaska. On that same note, France was served no strategic interest in conquering Alaska, due in large part to the likely popularity of supporting Alaska amongst the large Russian population within the Empire.

KingSweden 00:51, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

I don't know how attacking Alaska would be in Japan's interest in the mid-1880's, or why they would want to ally themselves with the United States. The Alaskan War was always visioned as a regional conflict with similar destructive tendencies as the Civil War (since there is no American Civil War in ATL).

KingSweden 04:54, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

Persian India
Recently, I have become concerned about your rule in India. I fear that there are so many people in your Indian territory, and with you new gains, there will be almost as many Indians as Persians. This is making me fear for your nation, that the Indians could revolt and cause chaos! Maybe you should make your nation dynastic union between India and Persia, two nations with one Emperor, or make Indian vassals, or if you want to keep one nation, make a commonwealth or something, so that your nation doesn't have civil war. Please act soon, I don't want Persia to be broken up into a lot of little pieces. LurkerLordB (Talk) 03:59, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Pounce
I don't really pay attention to badges normally but I'm pretty sure I got mine for editing 100 pages within a minute of their creation... I think.

KingSweden 06:24, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, 100 pages within an hour of their creation. I've got it, too. Lordganon 06:26, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

When you post as much as I do, it's pretty easy. Think of it this way: I make, most days, upwards of a couple hundred edits. Doesn't take much, and the badge itself is pretty new overall, imo. Though I'm surprised King has it. Lordganon 06:24, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

...What on earth are you talking about?

What I quoted is exactly the requirements for the badge. To quote the page where the admins can edit the badges: "for making edits on 100 pages within an hour of the page's creation!"

There is no badge even remotely like you describe.

Lordganon 08:28, February 2, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Flags
I don't believe so, so go ahead. There should be flags on several (most hopefully) nation pages.

KingSweden 00:16, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

I've got no clue how to make a gallery, unfortunately. :P

KingSweden 04:51, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

Next time you are going to do something with flags, please look and see if they are here already. Out of all of those, there was one that was not already here. Lordganon 06:31, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

RWG, you did it again despite my note. Seriously, all of those were already on the wiki. I mean, it'd even tell you that, often enough.

Please refrain from doing it again.

Lordganon 09:02, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

Not my problem if you're "too lazy."

Don't do it again. I'm not going to warn you, next time.

Lordganon 09:12, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

1200 ad
1200ad is up good uck

http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/User:Waroftheworld

No
The Anon was ManofSteel, the Spanish player, who was attempting to add a new post about his nation but accidentally deleted the others. Scandinator's not an idiot, he would know he'd gain nothing to have tried something like that. I also doubt that he would delete posts for any reason as unimportant as a nation not liking his, he is a better person than that. LurkerLordB (Talk) 01:46, February 2, 2012 (UTC)

FTBW Flag Page
No, the closest thing to a flag page I currently have would be the Nations page, and the then the States of the US and (soon!) the Confederacy. But I think this might be a good idea, though I have never seen one to base it off of.

Would it be like "National", "Non-Governmental Organization" and such? Now that you mention it, I would almost want to make it, but I think I'll let you make the basis of it, which we can then fill. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 17:02, February 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, I was thinking about not exactly putting them in a gallery, but give them a little block of text to explain them. Maybe a gallery to show different flags of the same country/NGO/etc (like the US with its stars, sorta thing). Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 17:38, February 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * Technically, it would be both, due tot he fact that it was annexed by France after the Third Global War, and it was then reformed in 2011. So, I think I would keep it in both spots because, technically, its both. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 20:08, February 4, 2012 (UTC)

States of America Revised and Reloaded (Map Game)
Hey RWG, sorry about my earlier actions on my other map games, I have been fixing things best I can, but since my other games died, I set up a new game, States of America Revised and Reloaded (Map Game)

Re: Serfdom
I haven't thought about serfdom to be totally honest. I know Napoleon outlaws it in conquered Russia but I suppose it would be difficult for both Siberia and especially Alaska to maintain serfdom post-Exodus - it just seems hard to convince people to emigrate to a new country in shackles. I suspect serfdom would be ended in practice if not in name during the Russian Exodus and then formally banned once it was seen to be difficult to maintain in the New World.

I don't usually plan super far ahead. My only "plan" as of now is to have Brian Williams as the Nationalist and Steve Colbert as the Democrat face off in the elections after winning the primaries.

KingSweden 17:03, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

Buying a colony
Could I buy your Indochina colony off you please? :D Imperium Guy 13:35, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

Its on TGA. :D Imperium Guy 11:04, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

Inspiration
Actually, I never heard of that AH until you linked me to it just now. I personally started FTBW after a failed attempt at another Napoleonic era timeline (which I cannot remember the POD now), but I was inspired to see what I could do with a opposite turnout of Trafalgar due to the importance that had been placed on it for over 200 years. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 05:42, February 15, 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm just starting to read it now, but I have to admit that it is well written and well thought out. Although detail is lacking, it is made up by a wide focus on the timeline. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 05:46, February 15, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, I'm surprised at how much the histories of this timeline and my own kinda line up, despite a much stronger Britain, a weaker US and a more militant European situation in mine. I do think that I might uses some ideas from here to expand my own story, but that will have to wait for later. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 06:15, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

Are you talking about FTBW or the one you linked me? Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 05:16, February 19, 2012 (UTC)


 * Not a problem. I have only gotten up to about the American Civil War but not much further due to my busy schedule at the moment. When I get the chance, I will read more, but not right now. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 12:32, February 19, 2012 (UTC)


 * I've actually stopped looking much at it becuase I don't want to plagarize ideas from it for mine. I like the premise, but there are some things I disagree with (espcially the fact that the maps with North America are not updated to what the story say sit is!), but otherwise it is an overall good story. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 22:01, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

Some, becuase they worked within that story, but they would not work in mine, as I'm pretty much finished the story outline. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 22:29, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

FTBW
Well, FTBW isn't exactly "closed", but its not open for anybody to edit either. I'm perfectly fine with grammar and spelling errors, as I'm horrible at both. But, if you do have ideas that will not conflict with things that have been added, feel free to let let me know, and if I like it, I will tell you to go ahead and add it. So, I guess it is more of a "semi-closed" timeline, as I'm not going to be tyrannical and delete anything made by anybody else. That is just not fair, as many ideas are so much better than what I could come up with (and may involve things I never even thought of or overlooked). I especially could use help with the Alternate Destinies (French Trafalgar, British Waterloo) page, as it is not really well developed. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 23:29, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

Avaro
Hi. I have a little doubt. You request Chilean help for the wat. But since that Chile is only a observer member, if we begin to aid military, then, we will be a target for CNAT, right? --Katholico 05:53, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

I would love to take control of India, but in needs to include Burma, Pakistan and Bangladesh. :D Imperium Guy 18:46, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

Cool. When do I join then? I really need the Emperor-King to visit to increase morale and calm rioters. :P Imperium Guy 23:23, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

C.B.I reaserch has led us to believe that one of you own is double-dipping. Nuve Greene is formulating plans to invade your territories in the East Indies. With the Indian armies nowhere near as they were developed in AvAr, taking on the Soviet Union is going to be a challange. Thank god we have superior demographics!! :D Imperium Guy 23:26, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

Spies manage to penetrate CNAT conferences. The republic is possible, its only going to be a constitiutional monarchy!! :P Imperium Guy 23:42, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

Hey, you didn't post for 1950.5 Draycos 02:20, February 18, 2012 (UTC)

Hey im playing as Nueva Granada in Axis vs Allies reloaded im starting up a new alternate history and was wondering if you could help me out. its A Darker Place

Well, another member has arrived for the Axis, bye bye commies!! :D Imperium Guy 18:42, February 19, 2012 (UTC)

Hey RWG. I'm Germany, and I'm starting to think about dropping out of the war and the CNAT, and join the Leauge of Neutral Nations or whatever its called. I was wondering what would happen to Germany, besides handing back the conquered territory. Enclavehunter 01:48, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Qattara Project
Well, for any of that to work at all, you need to give them an actual reason to do such a feat. In DD, there is one. What's the excuse here?

No way the lake is going to be called "Nasser."

And, "New Cairo" isn't going to be a name. Unless Cairo gets suddenly destroyed entirely like in DD.

Lordganon 05:17, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

...The idea long predates DD. Lordganon 05:23, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

...Yes, RWG, I'm well aware of what it's for. And you just had your answer, lol. Lordganon 05:36, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

thanks for making the new page rwg, i aprecaite it. DeanSims 19:14, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

My Return
No Ownerzmcown 21:55, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Your new pages
The extra code is being removed, which if you look at them, you'll notice. Lordganon 02:17, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

That is exactly why it happened. Lordganon 02:20, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

You shouldn't do it, for obvious reasons, but you can do whatever you want in that regard, truthfully. Lordganon 02:22, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

I will notice such things on my own.

As for overall... if you want to write something out like that, use a sandbox page of your own. Erases the problems.

Lordganon 02:26, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Here's one for you.

Just add the link to your user page, and use as needed.

Lordganon 06:33, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Think Before You Act
Hey RWG. I was wondering if there's anything I can help with on your timeline? It's really good, and detailed from the general pages. Enclavehunter 04:53, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Okay. Too kick the Alternate Destinies page off: Here's my first suggestion: Harrison Ford becomes an casino owner, and owns many of the supercasinos in Las Vegas. Enclavehunter 05:25, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, an comedian. I suggest not to, as doing so will make the timeline, less orginial, but not doing so, will give the readers something different. Enclavehunter 05:39, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

I can make the map, tell me where each country is, and I can make it. Enclavehunter 05:45, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

I can do it. Also, do you need help on the map of your timeline's world. Enclavehunter 05:51, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Love how your TL's turning out, if only mine (HR) went the same way!! I do think this could be a better flag for Hindustan: Its just the Mughal Flag but the colours are different. I also have another similar flag which might suit your purposes: Please consider these!! :D Imperium Guy 09:06, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!! :D Imperium Guy 20:12, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Yes!!! You needed to ask? Lol!! :D Imperium Guy 20:26, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Himachal Pradesh will still be a part of India :P I think I might be able to create a map for this (Hindustan!!) :D Imperium Guy 20:46, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

I don't want it lost, please!!!!!! :L Imperium Guy 20:53, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Yay!!! The map's almost ready, BTW!! :P Imperium Guy 20:58, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Here is a map you could use in Avaro to give pieces of Canada to the US for their full support. Yellow is remaining Canada while green in the "New US". It will be for the betterment of everyone as the west probably does want to be under English/American influence rather then French. :D Imperium Guy 23:13, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

The America map is for Axis vs Allies. As for the India map, don't worry about it, I'll upload a new version of the country when you figure out how big you want India to be. For the template, in visual mode, you add a proposal template and when it asks you for the parameters, you type in Think Before You Act. :D Imperium Guy 17:47, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

I definately don't think the old PoD was ASB, I quite liked it. The new PoD is also good. :D Imperium Guy 17:58, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

I was looking over your profile page and I just saw that I am there in the people you like to work with! YAY!!! :D :D (2 smileys, never happened before!!) Imperium Guy 18:53, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

BTW, finish the war in the Caribbean. Propose the land deal with Ameeica. And in SE Asia, offer half of Malaysia to Indonesia while keep the other half which is bordering Thailand or give it to Thailand. You can get another headache off your head then. This could also make Indonesia another crucial ally against the Soviets. BTW, give me military equipment and aid please!! Build ammunitions factories in the UK itself provide equipment while we use them. We don't have the manufacturing capabilites yet!! :D Imperium Guy 20:08, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

Both of them, infact, do have players!! :P Imperium Guy 20:15, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

Are you a trekkie?? :D Imperium Guy 20:27, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

As in do you like star trek? :D Imperium Guy 21:25, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

Well, I think a Star Trek section in your TL as a TV series would be good. :D Imperium Guy 21:41, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

I think you should first complete the timeline. Then we should make a page on ST!! :D Imperium Guy 21:48, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Terrorism in New Union
Sorry for the delay. As I mentioned before, I don't have a strait answer at the present. My focus has been on other matters. Just be patient. Suggestions are welcomed, as long as they fit with the timeline. --NuclearVacuum (Talk) 17:20, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Alt Dest (TBYA)
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. If you're suggesting that because the POD is similar (still extremely different though, from what I read) that the Alt Dests could be more or less copied from one to the other, then I think that's not a good idea, for several reasons (most prominent being that I didn't write about 2/3rds of the entries on that page). Besides, once you start getting up towards people born in the late 19th century and forwards, there'd be that sense of randomness that makes Alt Dest so appealing. So no, if I'm getting your question right. You're an imaginative guy! You can do good work (and you have) without needing to base it off of something that already exists.

KingSweden 21:52, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

That sounds very plausible!

KingSweden 22:46, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

Hmm well I do suppose that the Joseph-Isabella marriage is a very plausible way of maintaining peace in Spain. That would make Spain either a client state or part of France based on how marriages worked back then.

KingSweden 23:05, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

I think there'd absolutely be a war of independence, the question is how successful it would be. Spain was so exhausted in OTL that it didn't have the manpower to quell the rebellions. This could be different with the full might of Napoleon, however one has to wonder whether the New World would be Napoleon's 100% focus, though it very well could be.

KingSweden 01:31, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

Hay rwg, I didn't do anything wrong on the NATO page did I? I wanted to get more point's. So I added a globe of the NATO countries. If I did anything wrong, I am sorry, and I won't edit anymore pages. ima firin ma lazar!!!!! o(@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 19:25, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

About Axis vs Allies:Reloaded
Thanks for the offer, but no thanks. I did, however, originally joined as China in the beginning, but then decided to leave after about 4 turns. -Kogasa 20:28, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

I just saw that after I edited the NATO page, you edited it, so I thought I did something wrong. ima firin ma lazar!!!!! o(@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 20:32, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

Reply
First, let me say that most of that is none of your business, though I will answer some of it.

I do like my work. Admin-work suits me in a lot of ways.

I do have several timelines on my drawing board. Though, most are more geared towards a book-type thingy, long-term.

I've always enjoyed NW, as a timeline.

My favorite historical topics are geared towards the Long Eighteenth Century. More so, semi-economic matters. Though, that's not it, by far, and the list of things I've studied historically would surprise you, lol.

Lordganon 06:43, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

No, not going to post one anytime soon. Lordganon 07:10, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

hay I was trying to put the brazilian flag on the brazil page and the link was gone, but it looks like nothing is wrong with it. What should I do? ima firin ma lazar!!!!! o(@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 18:03, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

nevermind I got it. ima firin ma lazar!!!!! o(@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 18:03, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

...RWG, he was asking for help, not bugging you, lol. Lordganon 23:03, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

If he asks again, I'll say something to him. Lordganon 23:16, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about the map, that was me!! :/ BTW, in Africa, give the two countries north of SA to it as well as the countries it surrounds, like this.. I think I have become your perosnal declonization advisor (India). :D Imperium Guy 01:15, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

No country does, you can give it to SA. Even though SA is a NPC, you can still give land to them! :D Imperium Guy 08:54, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

BTW, are you fine with British China going like this? :D Imperium Guy 10:10, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

TBYA
1 word:''' Superb!! '''But I think you are overstretching the French. They will have nothing to do in Afganistan, so that might need to be removed. France will also never be able to ever expand in India, the 7-years war saw to that. They lost all incluence then, so there will be no French India. What you should have is the British, after conquering Burma, should conquer Indochina and Thailand. Therefore, you will have OTL India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Lanka, Thailand, Indochinese countries, Malaysia and Indonesia all under the British Empire. When the Sepoy Revolution happens, all of South and SE Asia will rebel and come under one superstate. The Union should stay and no Irish independence. Thats it and well done!! :D Imperium Guy 14:29, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

Afganistan: you need to see that they only invaded to protect the British Raj, not because they felt like it, lol!! ;D Plus, they had a land boundary with Afganistan and so logistics was not a problem.

Scotland: the thing is, France cannot dream of mounting a Scottish invasion. The French might improve their navy, but the English would still have 250 years of seafaring experience as well as the credit of defeating the Spanish Armada. on top of that, the UK has a land army and would repel any invasion with ease.

India: oh, I thought you had a point where India was given independence, but oh well. What could happen is later on Britain captures Thailand and then maybe after a few skirmishes with Indochina, war breaks out and they conquer it. Forget the part about the Sepoy Revolution.

Your turn for round 2, lol! :D Imperium Guy 20:22, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

Okay about India. But for the UK, you need to see the French won't even be allowed to get anywhere near the coast of the UK in general, the British navy would be this strong. :D Imperium Guy 10:44, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

I forgot Ireland, didn't I? Well, you need to see is the Irish were agitated at the time the the treaty was signed. If there was unrest, then it is possible that Southern Ireland could be given independence, not North Ireland as it is mostly Prodestant. The famine would be a good reason for unrest in Ireland. :D Imperium Guy 07:40, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Okay about Ireland, but I still think the UK would have huge patrolling. Plus, if Scotland is invaded, don't soubt the Scots, they will repel any inavsion, even if the have to use English help. :D Imperium Guy 22:53, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Pahang War
The Pahang war ended in 1819, before the Persians couldn't send any help these past couple of years. For your help during the last year of the war, however, Naples will still send you as much supplies as they can. LurkerLordB (Talk) 12:14, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

TBYA
Okay, I don't want to sound rude right now, but I'm actually getting tired of you constantly bringing up this TL. Don't get me wrong, I like it, but I have moved on: I've read it, I enjoyed it, now I'm ready to get back to my actual stuff.

Thank you for showing it to me, but I would prefer if you didn't message me about it any more. Please? Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 13:49, February 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry if I sounded rude, but you constantly bringing up that TL was getting on my nerves. I just wanted to stop you before you pushed me to far lol. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 16:42, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

Hidan43vr's TL
Well, since I have more than one POD each one is different.

The Rome was was inspired by a book i had read at that time which marked the reign of Emperor Commodus as the start of the fall of the Roman Empire, so I decided to get rid of him. I started with Rome because I thought it would be the best place to change the rest of the world but I needed to address the other parts of the world.

My next place was Asia where I extended the Han Dynasty and this led to a more powerful Japanese Empire.

I moved to North America next, I think, where I used the Iroquois nation in Northern New York to start a more modern and developed group of chiefdoms along the East Coast and the Great Lakes.

The same thing went into Mesoamerica, which I originally intended to work on with Alexanders but that didn’t work out like I wanted to and eventually after learning more about that region I was able to add to it on my own. Their inspiration was from all the advancements and power that they were known for that eventually became more solid states.

Africa was an afterthought that was caused by the European Timeline and Asian Timeline, I did not expect to make it at first.

I tried not to be biased in any of these but I like Japan and that might be why the Japanese had such an important role in my Timeline. The same thing with the Natives starting their development in Northern New York, which is where I am from. I don’t think any of those decisions were unjustified though. Hidan43vr 23:33, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

First I want to say that I love your questions and I wish more people asked questions about my timeline. :)

Christianity won't be a religion in the Roman Empire, sorry to say, it never spread as it was going to in OTL. In our history Constantine makes Christianity the official religion but Constantine never takes power, at least not the Constantine that we had. I hope that answered your question well enough. Hidan43vr 23:54, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

Christianity died out as a religion. The official Roman religion is a Polytheism that is run much liek the Catholic Church is today. There is an Archbishop of Rome who leads the church and several other important positions in major cities so its not as though there is no religion. In Asia there is also Zoroastrianism and the Gnosticism which extends from Judaism. I havent made a decision on Islam is you were wondering that but it probably won't grow either.Hidan43vr 00:14, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Persian Vassals
Firstly your stability is negative, should anyone attack you your territories wouldall collapse. Secondly from the PM Rules page: " You may have vassal states subordinate to your nation, but contiguous to your nation. They are ruled by your first nation's government, but are allowed to keep their own interests. You may have up to two vassal states, and they are in the category of colonies. Size rules do not apply, nor do limits on the number of total colonies, except within plausibility." This means Brueni and Yemen are puppet states or colonies. Yemen could be part of Persia if you tried though as it is not too far away. Scandinator (talk) 05:36, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

yes they are both still running DeanSims 15:02, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

Annexing Canada (TBYA)
Hey, RWG, I was just reading your sandbox for the new timeline and I had a question about it. You say the Americans annexed all of Canada. Which parts of "Canada" do you mean, since Canada wasn't a country back then? Upper and Lower Canada, along with the maritimes I could see, but the only other real colony they had was Rupert's Land, and the rest (the OTL Yukon and NWT part) was pretty much uninhabited by settlers so they can't really annex that. Is that what you meant by "Canada"? I assume if they only annexed those, the rest could be settled by Alaskans.

Also, if you need any maps I'd be more than welcome to help. Regards, ChrisL123 16:29, March 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yeah sure :P ChrisL123 04:26, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Mexican INdepedance
would New Spain join the Anglo-American allaince agaisnt Spain, you would lose some land obviously, but gain parts of South America and would be given some starter colonies in Africa. DeanSims 16:39, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

the wqar will start next turn, and Mexico can ither become a new antion, or be colonized by other countires or taken over by the Americans. DeanSims 18:56, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

Mexico can have part of OTL Peru in South America for its cooperation. Can Mexico begin to feel anti-Spanish feelings in this turn we are currently on? And when the Pact of Iron declares war on Spain, Mexico will be asked to declare independance. DeanSims 19:02, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

I knew about it for ages, and I don't think it is Justin Beiber (I hate that prick!!) :P Imperium Guy 22:02, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

How can anyone "LIKE" him? He is such a weirdo and his voice is sooooo irritating!! :P Imperium Guy 10:34, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

the war has begun. Please declare war on Spain, or in your case declare independace. DeanSims 17:47, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Beiber is... as Dean put it on my talkpage!! :P Imperium Guy 20:01, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

PM
I do read the messages, I just didn't see the need to reply as I have already said how I intend to act. For the record I have forgiven you its only a game after all, but its just if a country was messed about like that in real life they would be a bit wary of dealing again with that nation again, so I'm just acting how I think a real country would in those situations. Hence Persia is at the bottom of the pecking order for the division of Hanathwaddy territories. Its nothing personal really, VonGlusenburg (talk to Von!) 17:41, March 7, 2012 (UTC).

It means you get last pick, so when Hanathwaddy is divided, Persia is the last nation to pick what territories to get. E.g. if both Persia & Finland wanted Bengal, then Finland would get it as it is higher than Persia in the pecking order. It originates from birds and comparing society to that of a Chicken society. VonGlusenburg (talk to Von!) 23:25, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Here is a map showing what I want from Persia. Its not a lot, but its mainly what is mostly hindu and most likely to rebel. They will come under my control and won't be much problem to you. How's that? :D Imperium Guy 10:20, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

Nice, deal done! :D Imperium Guy 22:32, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

Just give the link to the page where u have written this rather than putting it onto my talkpage next time, lol! :D Imperium Guy 23:42, March 9, 2012 (UTC)

What did I say About the French in India? Britain vs Sikh Kingdom = Anglo-Sikh war. Remeber if India becomes independent from Britain in the 1850s, it will include Burma. The Mughal Empire was disbanded, so you will have republic in charge of the country earlier than you have it. Plus, in the riligious conflict between Muslims and Christians, Christians are going to be persecuted in India/Bharat as well. To explain the war for Pashtuistan, you might have the government stating that they invaded to help the natives enjoy the benefits of Bharati civilization. Love the last sentence of 1879!!

Easternization Map game
I had been planning that map game before I adopted the timeline, because I liked the idea but I didn't know if I should adopt it or not. Since I adopted the timeline, I had no reason to make it. I wasn't really planning on ever going back to that game. If there is great interest, it could be made though. LurkerLordB (Talk) 04:59, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) I wanted to give the Eastern nations a head start, although now that I think about it, I could have given them colonial expansion earlier and faster and an algorithm bonus and they would still have the advantage, but people could play as other nations. Doesn't matter now.
 * 2) I didn't want to rip-off the timeline, as it wasn't part of it then.
 * 3) Not according to the rules of the game. In theory for other games though, it would depend on the circumstances, the Spanish conquered them easily through a combination of factors, including disease, better technology, horses, and tribal rivalries.  If there was some scenario where contact was made a century or so before conquest, and the Aztecs gained horses and other techs from the trade and already had the disease and time to rebuild their population after disease, they wouldn't be so easily conquered.

Re:
The 20th century stuff seems pretty solid for the most part. Where I'd tread more carefully is the 19th... A lot the things you mentioned in the 1820's and 1830's seem awfully "modern," in that they sound like events that would make sense in contemporary times but perhaps not back then, if you follow.

KingSweden 23:13, March 12, 2012 (UTC)

From Legotron, can't you give me back the orignal edit of my article "League of World Empires (LWE) before you made your change to it.

Vary it up please
All of your posts on Principia Moderni are incredibly boring to read, because at least half of it is just copying and pasting the above post. Please stop copy-pasting. LurkerLordB (Talk) 21:13, March 14, 2012 (UTC)

Despite the fact that I often disagree with his moderator decisions, Scandinator has contributed an invaluable amount to the map game, so removing him from being a moderator is unfair. His nation will lose territory to revolts when plausible, as well pretty much every player nation in this game. If there are more complaints about biased moderator events, I may make a motion to divide powers upon the moderators more strictly so that he couldn't do any more non-disaster events, but I doubt and hope it will not come to that. LurkerLordB (Talk) 00:15, March 15, 2012 (UTC)

Scandinator
A final decision on what? LurkerLordB (Talk) 00:08, March 15, 2012 (UTC)

Persia
Have a new, Islamic Shah come to power, or have the old Shah convert to Islam. Then have him totally overhaul the government so that it is a new government (state that the government is totally new in the post, and maybe message Scandinator too). Then the Islamist revolts will stop, and your stability will be able to go up again. If you want to remain Christian, you could, but then you'd have to give up at least half of your country, so I'd recommend reconverting back to Islam. LurkerLordB (Talk) 01:09, March 15, 2012 (UTC)

Now that your government has been changed. I have no reason to induce more revolts in your nation. If you had listened to me in the Yemen, Brunei fiasco this latest round of revolts would have been avioded. Scandinator (talk) 04:34, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

New game
Fancy joining in? Africa, Indo-China, Canada and Central America all have nations avalable for a new player[].82.11.88.223 04:09, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

Hot Cold War - France has a new freind.
South Africa is giving aid to France to accelerate your recovery. Canada has broken up in a civil war and the USA is in a mess, so you may want to annex French speaking/pro-French Québec while you have the chance.Oxfordshire 1972 01:57, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Mexico
first of all, calm down, I know i just pissed you off realy bad, ive been there, you feel like you need to scream but you cant because its just on the internet. I will relieve some of the problems and allow you to keep the Republic of Chihuahua. Also, I will return some more lands. DeanSims 18:18, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

i cant. heres the new map: DeanSims 18:26, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

ok, i am being nice, Britain has a past of annexing entire countires that go agaisnt its interests. i can try and get you and America to split Texas up, also, I am inflciting upon you the following terms:
 * All expansion before 1845 must be approved by the United Kingdom.
 * The United Kingdom will not expand into any Mexican territory unless sold honestly and legaly by the Mexicans to the United Kingdom  UNLESS  the Mexicans declares war on the United Kingdom, in which the United Kingdom will be forced to act.
 * Hit Belize?

Hot Cold War

 * Fancy a trade deal with Genada?82.2.68.180 02:14, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

Congo

 * Congo has made France a trade deal and alliance. The Lithuanian rebels Mexico fostered in the USSR have Congo's support to.The River Nile-2 05:19, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

The game says you can have 2 counties, so you could pick a second nation if you want. Many servive in Europe, Africa, Indochina and the Middle East.The River Nile-2 05:23, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Finland and Food in 1983: Doomsday
Actually, only the Finland one was reverted - and yes, that one was vandalism.

The food one was making your edits, quite honestly, legible.

Lordganon 23:01, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

And if you'd have actually looked, you'd have seen that it had been adopted. Lordganon 08:22, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

RWG, "vandalism" is a relative term; but the fact is, you ignored the fact that the "Up for Adoption" template had been removed. Checking the history would have shown that Godfrey had adopted the article 10 days prior to that. Though Godfrey has done nothing with the article yet does not mean you can step in and do it for him. Instead, run it by Godfrey first and let him post it. SouthWriter 15:50, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Triple Alliance vs Central Powers
No, I have quit (or since I never posted, never joined?). I guess I should post that, I have just been busy and didn't have time to do that.TacoCopper 00:12, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Flags
RWG, while I'm all for you adding more of those flag pages, you need to quit uploading all of those extra flags. Seriously, a large portion of them are already on here, if you take the minute to look for them.

And, quit adding ones that have nothing to do with the nation in question to them, lol.

Lordganon 00:32, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

Triple Entente vs Central Powers
Hey RWG. I'm the player of Japan, and when or if the war with Spain comes, can Japan keep Macau? Enclavehunter 23:32, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Don't know. Wait until we see what Spain does. Enclavehunter 23:36, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Principia Moderni
You need to stop copy-pasting your posts and start reading what other people posted. You cannot expand your Andes colony, because if you looked at the map, you would see that it cannot expand at all, it is boxed in by other colonies. You cannot tell Naples and Bharat to stop fighting, because they already stopped fighting. And I am tired of reading the exact same thing for half of all of your posts. Please cease and desist. LurkerLordB (Talk) 21:22, March 27, 2012 (UTC)

Think Before You Act
First of all, I don't have time to read the whole thing, lol. However, from the little bits I did read, it appears to be realistic (though some of the pictures not so much... Canadian Confederation standing in for St. Petersburg Accords?)

As for the Turkish War: unless their is a massive shift in the way they do things, they will loose the war. They will fight hard, but with both French and Russians attacking them, they will not win unless Britain or other European nations come in to distract both of them. Even then, Turkey will be devastated, and will face a long, hard road back to even secure their position, much less Great Power status. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 02:25, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

It looks like it, but I think making that war six years long is WAY TO LONG. Two, tops, as Turkey most likely would collapse or have a coup d'tat way before then, as it seems they are facing defeat after defeat after defeat. No nation as unstable as Turkey in the 1820's, with two of the most powerful nations in the world attacking, can withstand that long. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 02:25, March 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * Alright: details are fine. I don't go into many details with my main timeline because I will be trying to go into detail in more specific articles. I will give you my general and very broad scenario for a Turkish War, based on what happened OTL, and how it will be resolved. It is not set in stone: one particular Russian, French or Turkish success or blunder can completely throw it off.


 * Well, I would say anywhere between 12-18 months. With four fronts, two of them (Greek Independence and Balkan Revolution) basically internal unrest that will tie down soldiers that would be needed to fight France and Russia, another (Egypt) that will be difficult to resupply and hold in the face of a forceful naval assault, and then the French-Russian intervention which is basically two of the strongest powers marching onto Constantinople.


 * The time table (in my opinion) would be more along the lines of Russia attacks right off the bat, and marches on Constantinople. This, plus the siege of Sofia (I remember that!) would take about five to seven months months. Then French intervention, most likely in the form of naval blockade, and landings in either Anatolia, Greece or the Dardanelles. All three can be defended easily if the Turks are given time to prepare due to their hilly, sometimes mountainous terrain, but Greece will be the more unstable with the Independence movement, so perhaps the best choice. French troops and Greek freedom fighters will eventually wear down, if not outright defeat the Turkish garrison there, allowing them to then join up with Russia toward Constantinople. Later landings in Anatolia or the Dardanelles (perhaps better if in Anatolia) can help circle Constantinople from the Asian side while Russia holds the European part.


 * Though, perhaps before the French intervention in Greece or the Balkans, this would be the time to attack Egypt, and draw Turkish troops and resources away from the Defense in the North. So long as France maintains a force in Egypt, and not even necessarily pressing an attack, it will tie down Turkish troops, which is the idea to help Russia.


 * The Balkans is a tricky situation. Russia, Austria and France will have an interest in making sure either that the Balkans is out of Turkish hands and therefore an unstable tinderbox of religious, cultural and political unrest no matter how it is divided; or stabilized under a power, but Austria, France nor Russia will want the other two controlling it, so it would revert back to Turkey. I include Austria because, although they may not be in the war, but this unstable area is on their door step and they have minorities that can be roused to cause instability in the Hapsburg Empire, so will want a seat at the negotiating table to decide what to do with them.) It might almost be in everyone's interest to leave them in Turkish hands despite the nationalist sentiment, as they can at least make sure it won't spill over into another, even bigger European War (look what happened in World War One).


 * So, with France in Egypt from about a month-six weeks after hostilities start, and Russia knocking on Constantinople's door in about six-eight months after fighting through OTL Romania and Bulgaria, plus French help in the form of Grecian Independence, and then lands in Anatolia and marches to help the Russians, arriving perhaps a few weeks later after they do, and then a siege of Constantinople can begin in earnest.


 * Now, depending on how long the Turks can hold out (with supplies, morale and political will), this can drag the war on for a long time. Russia can remain in the war almost indefinitely, but France is a different story. After all, the French Revolution, while nearly gutted by Napoleon, is still influencing the public and they will either demand results, or demand to get out. If it becomes to expensive, I could see France trying to get out of it anyway they can.


 * So, I say the Turks hold on for about four or five months. However, with no visible end in sight, the military generals may take matters into their own hands, overthrow the sultan, and end the war anyway they can, or else go out in a blaze of heroic, courageous, fool hardy and ultimately doomed glory. So, either after a failed battle or after a coup, the war will end.


 * What will change? Not much. France will get extraordinary rights in Egypt, all short of outright annexation and colonization, perhaps even with the ability to build the Suez Canal. Greece becomes independent, as does Romania (Rumania, however you want to call it). Bulgaria becomes an autonomous state still nomally under Turkish control.


 * The biggest losers will be Russia and the Balkan states. Austria, Russia and France will get together, and after long, strenuous negotiations, the Balkans is reverted back to Turkish control with more Home Rule. Russia, with their big goal to ultimately control the Bosporus Straits, will be denied by France and Austria (and even Britain, aloof of what is going on in the Eastern Mediterranean). If Russia is ever allowed to get control of the straits, they will be a threat to everyone, not just Turkey. So, France will get what it wants, Austria will be safe and secure, Turkey is defeated, but will be propped up as a counterweight to Austria and Russia, and Russia will be furious at, yet again, being denied the Bosporus Straits.


 * Now, this is how I would do it. Feel free to modify it to your hearts content, but this is the reasonable solution: France get what it wants, Turkey is propped up by the powers as a counterbalance, Austria tries to secures its southern border, but Russia will, yet again, not get what it wants. Lieut. Tbguy1992: Profile; Talk 04:42, March 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey, since your are now the owner of Macau, on the next turn, can I purchase Macau from you. Enclavehunter 22:39, March 30, 2012 (UTC)