User:Reximus55/Centrist Party

Partisanism - decrying the Conservative, the Progressives, or the Labour Party - has fueled this Government since its inception. That very fuel ran dry and left the Government in a state of disuse for almost five months.

The Centrist Party believes that we cannot have a TSPTF Party, an Anti-TSPTF Party and an Anti-Ms Party. We need unity in order to allow the government to change the very fiber of the Wiki, and the Centrist Party offers this Unity.

Senators of the Party may vote as they feel will better the Wiki as a whole -- they own the Party, not the other way around! Please do not ask what the Party's stance on an issue is if you are one of our Senators -- we gave you a vote in the Senate so you can vote as you wish! (I, Rex, am willing to tell you how I feel but that is purely my opinion)

Goals

 * Plausibility, but no tyrannical use of the ASB-Biased tag
 * Plausibility within Map Games, but no limitations of Creativity
 * Acceptance of ASBism not as an insult, but as a tag to categorize a page.
 * Three Active Brass
 * Ban Reform
 * Less Harsh Bans for non-offensive, non-sockpuppeting "crimes"
 * No unilateral Bans for minor infractions
 * Reform (to a certain extent) on sockpuppeting rules
 * Community Timelines and Activities
 * Days After Chaos
 * Wiki Newspaper
 * Activity within the TSPTF and Retirement once Duties are no longer performed
 * Separation of TSPTF and Map Games
 * TSPTF nominations based upon merit and ability to perform duties, not necessarily Edit Count or Popularity
 * Finding common ground between the more and less radical elements of the Reform Movement to have the biggest impact on the whole of the Wiki

Known Members

 * Reximus55 (Founder)
 * Bfoxius (Co-Founder)
 * Sine dei gloriem (Co-Founder)
 * CookieDamage
 * Willster22
 * I am that guy
 * LightningLynx89
 * The Great Rcchang of Luxembourg
 * Daxus Inferno
 * NicDonalds
 * JoshTheRoman

Constitution
More to come later.
 * 1) Impeachments must be authorized by both the Facilitator and the High Archon of Centrism.
 * 2) This is a completely and utterly authoriatarian amendment for which I will not, and I urge others not to, ratify. Cookiedamage (talk) 02:46, September 28, 2014 (UTC)

Discussion and Inter-Party Voting

 * Note: All discussion can be removed at the termination of the discussion, or at the decision of the Facilitator.

Impeachment and Party Removal of Reximus55
Senator CookieDamage has moved to impeach party founder Reximus55 for his behaviour, including continuous racist statements on chat, and disruptive actions during the ongoing 2014 September General Elections. This impeachment will remove Reximus55 from his Facilitator role and ban him from the party. This vote, began at 02:23 UTC on September 28, will last for 24 hours, concluding at 02:23 UTC on October 5.
 * Yes
 * Cookiedamage (talk) 02:23, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * No
 * 02:36, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * Discussion
 * As this is in contradiction to our Constitution so far, this section is hereby not really valid. I shall allow it to remain for now, but please be aware of this fact. Additionally, as NonEuc is not a member who can be recognized as a member by all members, I am removing his vote. Finally, the vote is being extended to last 1 week. --Rex.
 * First of all, I am laughing at the fact that you voted on your own impeachment vote. Secondly, you are using the excuse that we are contradicting the constitution. The constitution, which you made after the vote was introduced essentially bans impeachments. Secondly, no one has voted on or ratified this amendment, so it's pretty much null. Furthermore, you are actually tampering with the vote and extending the voting time by one week, as well as flat out removing a vote which would favor impeaching you. You are making a complete and utter fool of yourself, and for your own sake, stop it. Cookiedamage (talk) 02:45, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * The vote is being extended because it being on a BRAND new page and just going up and only being seen by a few people, and with VERY little discussion, I feel that 1 week is more appropriate. Additionally, you even said that you agree that NonEuc shouldn't be able to vote. Furthermore, you just added his sig to this page; he never added it himself to this page. 02:55, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ummm. No I Didn't lol. How would I add his sig??? And proof that I did anyways, btw??? Cookiedamage (talk) 03:05, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ummm. No I Didn't lol. How would I add his sig??? And proof that I did anyways, btw??? Cookiedamage (talk) 03:05, September 28, 2014 (UTC)