Alternative History:Request for user rights

'''NOTICE: THE TSPTF CURRENTLY HAS TWO OPEN POSITIONS FOR LIEUTENANT. PLEASE MAKE YOUR NOMINATIONS NOW.'''

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF (user rights). Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only 1 administrator for every 1,000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time 1,000 more articles are created or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, as long as they accept the nomination first.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.
 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

CrimsonAssassin
Nominator:1000Monkeys

Sorry guys, I forgot to write my reasons. I'd like to start with his motivation. When he decides to do something, he's hell-bent on doing it, provided he doesn't get bored. When there's a situation, he wants a fair resolve to it. As he is my brother, I can definately say that he is a great, moral person. He's the kind of person you can hang around with, and he loves this site. He visits almost every day. Whether or not he's remembering to log in is another thing, but he just loves it here.

As for people thinking this is some sort of sock-puppet deal, just stop. We really are two different people. As for what I said, I hope you guys aren't taking that the wrong way. I simply meant he doesn't like giving up. Crimson, hang in there! Here's his edit log.
 * Supporters
 * Objectors
 * Flag_of_South_Korea.pngang- (Talk | Contribs) 20:42, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Certainly is suspicious. The possibility of abusing multiple accounts is there (how do we really know Crimson and Monkeys are two different people). The fact that Monkeys has yet to return to explain why he picked Crimson. I also am a little concerned by something Monkeys said about Crimson: "He's pretty cool, but very stubborn if you get him angry'." A TSPTF member needs to have control over his emotions and not make decisions simply because someone made him angry. Mitro 13:21, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Discussion
 * For this nomination to be valid, Crimson needs to accept it. As far as I can tell, he has not been contacted about it. 1000Monkeys, please inform Crimson that you nominated him to be a Constable. Mitro 19:26, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Whoa! Thank you so much, man! I'm honored to accept the nomination! CrimsonAssassin 21:53, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * One little problem. 1000Monkeys is Crimson's little brother, and he sometimes uses his account. Flag_of_South_Korea.pngang- (Talk | Contribs) 21:58, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Is this true? Matt
 * I don't use 1000Monkey's account. Why would I? I see no reason to. But yes, he is my brother. Also, I don't overreact when I'm angry, I just don't give up. CrimsonAssassin 19:58, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I have no evidence on it, I'll just have to trust Crimson not to do it, it's just that he could. After all, Monkeys has taken Crimson's side on every map game he's played. Anyways, besides, I don't think he's qualified enough to be a part of the TSPTF. Flag_of_South_Korea.pngang- (Talk | Contribs) 23:34, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, and he's only been around since September, which means he barely qualifies for the Constable, but I don't think he's experienced enough, and I've never really quite seen him really "battling" vandalism. Regards, Flag_of_South_Korea.pngang- (Talk | Contribs) 23:37, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, 1000Monkeys has been gone since February. Then, he comes back, makes two edits, both to hominate Crimson, and bam! No more edits. He didn't even tell Crimson on his talk page he was nominated! (Although he could have told him IRL). Anyways, I'm not sure about all of this.
 * Also, 1000Monkeys has been gone since February. Then, he comes back, makes two edits, both to hominate Crimson, and bam! No more edits. He didn't even tell Crimson on his talk page he was nominated! (Although he could have told him IRL). Anyways, I'm not sure about all of this.


 * 16:16, March 20, 2011 (diff | hist) Alternative History:Request for user rights ‎(→CrimsonAssassin)
 * 15:05, March 19, 2011 (diff | hist) Alternative History:Request for user rights ‎(→Current Nominations)
 * 17:57, February 22, 2011 (diff | hist) WWIII (Map Game) ‎(→November)
 * 17:23, February 22, 2011 (diff | hist) WWIII (Map Game) ‎(→November)
 * 09:01, February 17, 2011 (diff | hist) WWIII (Map Game) ‎(→September)
 * 18:28, February 8, 2011 (diff | hist) Imperial Europe 2 (Map Game) ‎(→Plausible)
 * 18:24, February 8, 2011 (diff | hist) Imperial Europe 2 (Map Game) ‎(→Mods)
 * 10:44, February 8, 2011 (diff | hist) WWIII (Map Game) ‎(→April)
 * 16:00, February 3, 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:1000Monkeys ‎(→Europe 1100)
 * 14:28, February 3, 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:1000Monkeys ‎(→Europe 1100)
 * 14:26, February 3, 2011 (diff | hist) Europe 1100 (Map Game) ‎(→1125)
 * 14:23, February 3, 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:Roguejedi ‎(→Europe 1100)
 * 14:19, February 3, 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:1000Monkeys ‎(→Europe 1100)
 * 10:53, February 2, 2011 (diff | hist) WWIII (Map Game) ‎
 * 11:58, January 19, 2011 (diff | hist) Europe 1100 (Map Game) ‎(→1115)
 * 11:34, January 18, 2011 (diff | hist) Europe 1100 (Map Game) ‎(→1114)
 * 21:49, January 12, 2011 (diff | hist) Europe 1100 (Map Game) ‎(→1101)
 * 10:31, January 5, 2011 (diff | hist) Europe 1100 (Map Game) ‎(→1105)
 * 16:39, January 3, 2011 (diff | hist) Europe 1100 (Map Game) ‎(→1103)
 * 16:43, December 28, 2010 (diff | hist) Europe 1100 (Map Game) ‎(→1101)
 * 18:39, December 24, 2010 (diff | hist) Europe 1100 (Map Game) ‎(→1100)
 * 15:25, December 16, 2010 (diff | hist) Talk:Massive Impact (Map Game) ‎(→The Second American Civil War)
 * 15:24, December 16, 2010 (diff | hist) Talk:Massive Impact (Map Game) ‎(→The Second American Civil War)
 * 12:15, December 8, 2010 (diff | hist) N File:Make your nation mapgame starting map.png ‎(top)
 * 18:19, December 7, 2010 (diff | hist) Talk:Imperial Europe Map Game ‎(→World War)
 * 18:12, December 7, 2010 (diff | hist) Talk:Imperial Europe Map Game ‎(→World War)
 * 11:53, December 7, 2010 (diff | hist) Imperial Europe Map Game ‎(→1450)

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, a long as they accept the nomination.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Rules

 * Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.
 * They are a Lieutenant.
 * They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month—from the day the nomination is put forth—are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for nomination to be accepted.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Impeachment
It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

 * User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
 * If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment.
 * Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
 * Registered users' votes must have 2/3rd supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month—from the day the nomination is put forth—are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a 2/3rd supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons
There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:
 * They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
 * They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
 * They have have not been fair, restrained, and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
 * They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

Note: One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.

Current Impeachments
===Name of TSPTF member===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.