User talk:Pelicary



Reply
Do I know you? 69.47.104.219 22:28, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

No, I don't think so?, why?-- -Sunkist- 23:41, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Because you left a message on my talk page telling me to get back to my vacation. 69.47.104.219 02:27, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I'm just friendly, seeing as you are the big kahuna around here.---Sunkist- 02:29, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you are going to contribute to 1983: Doomsday, you need to follow the, especially the part of marking all new articles as proposals. I laready had to do this for you several times, and I am not the only one who has. Please be more careful in the future. Mitro
 * Alright.---Sunkist- 19:13, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright.---Sunkist- 19:13, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Uk Indian Ocean Territory
Is it okay if I adopt this article from you? Thanks. Arstarpool 04:11, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

What do you plan to do with it, I saw you undid my history..---Sunkist- 04:14, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Well, for one, you actually made the article worse by deleting the template, so I undid it, and another one was because it does not harbor nukes.Arstarpool 04:17, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it dosent, but it does hold a stratic point in the middle of the Indian Ocean, if you read in the dissus page of it.---Sunkist- 04:18, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

A strategic point, you mean. It is strategic, but held no true threat to the Soviet Union. You do not understand, it's not like the Soviets were out to destroy everything, just the

Did you not read the disscus page? We made if offical that it was one of the many bases to be nuked first.---Sunkist- 15:41, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Anthem
It's pretty much the American anthem edited to have it be more similar to South Florida. The tune is the same, other than the words. Arstarpool 19:21, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Cornwall and Plymouth
I've looked over lists on two sites, and nothing came up. I'm assuming that it's spared so we can go ahead and get started. Have any ideas for a name? Arstarpool 04:02, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

It's your idea, you make the name. Arstarpool 04:17, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

Cornwall Territory Disputes
Sunkist, one problem with the article currently is that it contains land that belongs to the Celtic Alliance. If you could move it to only contain souther Cornwall, then we will be fine. Arstarpool 05:31, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

San Marino
Could I help you out with the article you just wrote? Yesterday I was thinking of writing it up, but you beat me to it. Arstarpool 17:40, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

It's pretty good, but remember alot of post-DD city-states like Monaco expanded. Maybe it would expand a little more than you said. And why would Tuscany threaten them? They aren't Italian,and Sicily only claims all of Italy, so they might even be allies! Remember that it would be pretty hard for them to aqquire lots of food, too.Arstarpool 17:51, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Rather than those three Italian cities, why doesn't it slowly annex the small towns around it's borders? And are you still working on it? Arstarpool 18:04, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

I don't know. Maybe we can have Tuscany, San Marino, and Venice apply for tri-membership under an alliance to the ADC, like the Italian Defense and Economic Association. Kindof like how the Nordic Union members are listed. Arstarpool 22:39, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Looks good. Arstarpool 00:20, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Make the article, and then we'll talk. I'm busy with my thriving open TL "Wasteland Europe" but I will still be able to help you make it. Arstarpool 05:15, July 2, 2010 (UTC)

Titanic
The UK accuses the US for sinking the Titanic. Just correcting the comment you sent me. After all, the UK is still bitter for not retaking the United States during the War of 1812. Max117D 01:53, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

I didn't say the UK planned the sinking of their own ship, but the Sinking of the Titanic would cause the British Empire to declare war on the United States and the events of World War one would change IF that happened. Max117D 02:05, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Like I said, the UK is still bitter after the War of 1812 because they didn't retake the United States. Even though the Titanic recieved warnings that the large iceberg was in the direction of the Titanic they choose to ignore it, thinking that they'll steer clear not knowing that the rudders are too small for a big ship like the Titanic. Max117D 02:58, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

hmmm.......you're right, but suppose that the King George name continues to live on. Max117D 03:04, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

or maybe that some soldiers who settled down and raised families are still bitter and their childern lived on to hate the United States and their childern would be in the position of the British Government. Max117D 03:06, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

so you're saying you don't like it? well if you don't like it you don't have to be rude. Max117D 03:10, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

ever watched Sherlock Holmes? Max117D 21:26, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

South Georgia and Sandwhich Islands and Gough Island
Would you like these to continue to follow the current monarch of the British realm, King Andrew I? And since I'm now involved in all of your articles, can I just become your nation-building buddy? :DArstarpool 04:14, July 2, 2010 (UTC)

Indeed is it arguments. --Catherine 19:50, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

Indiana
Ummm just to let you know, Indiana is still part of the U.S. You need to change the article to talk about the American state of Indiana. Eastward Expansion 20:15, July 15, 2010 (UTC)

Also, when you join Rise of Roses, you need to tell me or Smallpox.Eastward Expansion 20:18, July 15, 2010 (UTC)

Talk to Smallpox, he created Rise of Roses and that USA page. Also, we just created the map showing all the nations so you can't really make new ones, only ones that already have been created but don't have articles.Eastward Expansion 20:41, July 15, 2010 (UTC)

Central World
Hi might you help me expand and create articles for Central World, it's now a small community project, i'm trying to turn it into a big one! Please answer me, VENEZUELA 03:04, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

On your comment on South Writer's religious debate.
My thoughts exactly.

First Coast and Daytona Beach and the Unified Florida
Mitro thinks that Daytona Beach would have been hit, which is a big problem for us. Here are the options we can choose:

1. Cut out Daytona Beach, this will hurt First Coast's Economy, and Republic of Florida's, but it might be easier and quicker.

2. Take a vote on its fate, we might be able to keep Daytona Beach, but it might take a while. e shu

3. Other

Please get back to me Sunkist, it is important that all three articles are without problems before we go through with the Republic of Florida, and I want Daytona to survive, so we should come up with a plan. Arstarpool 22:22, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Akrotiri and Dhekelia
Hi Sunkist. I was wondering if you wanted to build this up, since it is "Obsolete" but not nominated for deletion? If so, let me know. I can delete it for good (a little cleanup is all), or link it to lift it out of the "orphan" category. As an empty page, it's not worth much. SouthWriter 19:17, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Go ahead, forgot about that page :D--Sunkist- 19:26, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Texas
Hi, Sunkist I read your comment in the talk page of CW I didn't know it was so good, but I write because I already fixed the Texas problem read it on the POD or in the Texas talk page. VENEZUELA 17:34, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Indiana
1. The fact you have it as a member of the Legaue of Nations. Very few nations in North America are members because they do not have sea access or good air access. Delmarva, for example, has access to the sea and thus would be able to visit the League of Nations meeting in Tonga. A landlocked nation like Indiana has no sea access and air access would be extremely difficult.

2. Tell me one thing: What's your way around regarding the fact that Superior and the Indiana state article mention nomads roaming throughout the state? If they had somewhere to settle they probably would settle. And why would Kentucky take part of the state if there was already a government there? In my honest view the only plausible way this article could exist if it was made up of a couple counties or some confederation of independent cities but Mitro and others agree that we've run out of room for big nations in North America. I'm not being mean I'm just trying to use logic to solve the situation. Arstar [talk] 05:15, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

The "Natives" means non-Native Americans too, you know that right? Other articles just mention normal nomads roaming the state aimlessly. I wouldn't have a problem with the United Communities. Also, Indiana is more "mid-west" than Ohio! Changing Toledo just to make Indiana fit would cause some problems however. Believe me I learned a lesson about changing canon articles a while back. Arstar [talk] 05:37, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Because Toledo was only a city-state back then. About the native-Toledo thing, Toledo only claims those lands. The nomads wander almost the entire state, and the Superior and Indiana state article state that indeed the area of the Republic are made up of a bunch of city-states. Arstar [talk] 05:51, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Regarding the canon question, its difficult. Yes and no. Would I pass the article right now? No. Do I think that it can be re-worked into something that will match canon and allow Indiana to participate in the international scene? Yes, yes indeed. In fact I have a plan but I need to get some sleep now, even though there's no school tomorrow for me because of the tropical storm in the Carribbean. Arstar [talk] 06:15, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Ok but one quick question if you had to get rid of one area would it be the north or the middle? Arstar [talk] 06:22, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Indiana Reunification
The reason why Indiana is three separate states is for logistical and bureaucratic reasons reunification is a possibility in a few years. Of course they would remain a part of Kentucky. Perhaps the name of the state could be "Southern Indiana".--Zack 16:59, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Your Comment
I would love to take this off-wiki and have it erupt into a flame war on a chat-room or something but I'm going to keep it civil. However I express no interest in working on your Indiana article or helping you out anymore on anything else if your just going to blast me with bad words on my talk page. If you took the time to look at the talk page I gave you some pointers to make it more plausible; I.E: The confederation of towns and cities mentioned on the state article. Fort Wayne was hit regardless and pretty much every city thats hit ends up abandoned. The un-nuked side just don't sit in their apartments and go about. Hell, if Doral, the city above South Miami got hit by even a small nuke I would run my ass to Cuba! In fact all of the nuked cities except for a few which were rebuilt (Panama City, Nagasaki, Taipei) end up just sitting there, radiated with a handful of people. For a nuked city with radiation to get rebuilt (a blast on downtown will effect the whole city, just smaller and not as bad uptown) by a nation which has few international contacts and is just a bit implausible. Plus you asked for my help remember? So I tried making it more plausible and you undid my changes. That's not upsetting me but you still have me, LG, and Mitro complaining about the size. Arstar [talk] 04:14, October 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Indiana Limestone
Sorry for the slow response. I like the idea, go for it! --Zack 16:41, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

Main Page
I suggest you learn to talk to people. That was very insulting of you, in my opinion, and I would say that is your department.

Your post quotes the "Indiana University." This is in your proposal, and as such cannot be included in a news post. There may be a university by that name in otl Bloomington, but in atl Kentucky there is not.

Lordganon 03:08, December 12, 2010 (UTC)

You are the one is is always insulting, Sun. Though you do fail to notice that. Sign your posts, btw.

That article may say that, but the Kentucky article does not, so as far as I'm concerned you're wrong. As such, you are wrong. And that's besides you not having the authority to touch Kentucky whatsoever in the first place.

Lordganon 04:43, December 12, 2010 (UTC)