Alternative History:Request for user rights

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF (user rights). Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only 1 administrator for every 1,000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time 1,000 more articles are created or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

IMPORTANT: only registered users with 100 or more edits and at least one month on this wiki will be allowed to vote in the user nominations or to nominate candidates.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, as long as they accept the nomination first.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.
 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Scraw
Well, Bfoxius was going to do this, but he hasn't gotten round to it, so I'll jump the gun and do it myself.

Scraw is a prominent member of our wiki. He is universally liked and respected, and has two timelines of his own, both of which he actually works on and develops (unlike me =P). He would be an excellent addition to the TSPTF in my opinion, and I thus nominate him for the position opf Constable.
 * Supporters:
 * He was the first user that congratulating me on my "One year now..." blog post. FirstStooge (talk) 15:27, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * A good friend of the wiki and this editor.  Monster Pumpkin (talk) 15:29, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * Really should be me putting this up (actually I mean it :P) [[Image:1.png|23px]] Imp (Say Hi?!) 15:32, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * -Kogasa [[Image:Miko THPW2.png|50px]] [[Image:Flag of Europe.svg|23px|border]] 2013 August 19, 18:04 (CET)
 * VonGlusenburg (talk to Von!) 17:32, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * This is UglyTurtle, Signing off. 17:56, August 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes" 13:43, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * ChrisL123 (talk) 02:29, August 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Warman555 (talk) 13:54, August 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Objectors:
 * Discussion:
 * Hrm, uh, without getting too cheesy and sappy, I'll make it blunt. I am more than happy to accept this position and it will most certainly aid in making undoing, reverting, and fixing that weird code that happens when you have an edit conflict in map games easier. I am also grateful for just my nomination and will do my best to remain humble and help maintain order on this wiki. 19:50, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * Lol. Most users talk about fighting vandals. Yout alk about 'fixing that weird code that happens when you have an edit conflict in map games'. *shakes head* Guns, who is too lazy to go to source mod and type out his real sig. (talk) 13:23, August 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, somebody has to do it. :P And I think combating vandalism and trolls is an obligatory duty of every user on a wiki. 17:51, August 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * I think you don't need to be a constable to fix edit conflict problems. The one and only Guns, who is too lazy to go to source mod and type out his real sig. (talk) 12:47, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Scraw is an active user and ready to undertake the responsibilities of the TSPTF. CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes" 13:43, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * To be frank, undoing is a pain in the rear. Rollback is quick, and you don't risk having a second conflict. Regardless, I will do my best to uphold all of my duties and responsibilities. 00:58, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * It's almost been two weeks, and I don't really think anything is going to change here. The one and only Guns, who is too lazy to go to source mod and type out his real sig. (talk) 08:52, August 29, 2013 (UTC)

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor, a long as they accept the nomination.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Rules

 * Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.
 * They are a Lieutenant.
 * They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month—from the day the nomination is put forth—are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for nomination to be accepted.

Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Impeachment
It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

 * User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
 * If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment.
 * Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
 * Registered users' votes must have 2/3rd supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month—from the day the nomination is put forth—are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a 2/3rd supermajority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons
There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:
 * They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
 * They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
 * They have have not been fair, restrained, and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
 * They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

Note: One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.

Current Impeachments
===Name of TSPTF member===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.