Alternative History:Request for user rights

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF. Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only be one administrator for every 1000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time a new one is needed or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Only registered users with 200 or more edits and at least two months on this wiki will be allowed to vote in the user nominations or to nominate candidates.

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor so long as they accept the nomination first.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.
 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail or been blocked in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Thewolvesden/Andy
Andy is a prominent user of the newer generations. He is often active, a calm and reasonable person, excluding his excessive sighing. I personally consider him a great candidate for chatmod, seeing as he always tries to help people on chat and reports vandals and trolls to me ASAP. I personally would also like to have another european chat mod to keep peace during hours where the majority are asleep. In conclusion, #Andy4Mod2k16 SkyGreen24 19:54, October 1, 2016 (UTC)


 * Supporters
 * First  SPQR Emblem Transparent.png Consul Ioshua   #Beware!  TSPTF_Badge.svg 10:14, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * ​yeah Toby2: THEY CALL ME Mr. Awesome!!! 19:56, October 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * The best option among European users; a region that is historically under-moderated. 20:06, October 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favorite nom on the wiki. Flag of the Xanian Empire.svg Flag of Xyon.svg Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 20:08, October 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * Curmudgeonly yours - Crim 20:23, October 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * 20:40, October 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * .....  Because I'm Just... Too... SSSWWWEEEEEETTT!!!
 * Yeah even if he is a European right wing twat who sighs like he has lung cancer he would be my first pick. User:Person67
 * Yee 카와이카매 (카와이카매talk) 21:38, October 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * —  T  I   M  (TSW • AH • MGW • Contribs )
 * Oh, I didn't mean to push that button! † Oh, well leave a message I guess 19:34, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Cour *talk* 19:24, October 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * 19:26, October 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * #BRINGBACK THESQUIRREL 21:04, October 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * Objectors
 * More questions than answers
 * Give it 6 months. ~ Awesome history 28
 * -- 22:16, October 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * #BRINGBACK THESQUIRREL 21:04, October 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * Objectors
 * More questions than answers
 * Give it 6 months. ~ Awesome history 28
 * -- 22:16, October 9, 2016 (UTC)


 * Discussion
 * I feel really jaded for this nomination, and I was half-jokingly suggesting it, but I will accept this nomination. I feel we need more chadmins during more inactive hours; Sky is not going to cut it alone. Thanks again for the support. Wolves
 * Am I the only one who noticed Josh voted "first"? Haha... 15:09, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * A Much needed level headed mod -Feud
 * Met him for 10 seconds, seems chill ~Gunny Bunny
 * I have been convinced to change my mind. For now #BRINGBACK THESQUIRREL

Rules

 * You may nominate another editor so long as they accept the nomination.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

 * They have an account under a username.
 * They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted.
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also have not had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

UR
I will make this simple. UR is a kickass user, who has shown that he can meet the requirements of the role in a manner that I believe to be more effective than a few of our active TSTPF members, perhaps myself included. He has the knowledge to provide new users with the tools needed to write effective timelines, and yea he can be a tool himself sometimes but there are always other LTs and other TSTPF members, as well as the handy dandy impeachment process, to make sure he stays in line. I can see no reason why he should not take the next step. 03:02, October 22, 2016 (UTC)


 * Supporters
 * ​ SPQR Emblem Transparent.png Consul Ioshua   #Beware!  TSPTF_Badge.svg 03:10, October 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * Flag of the Xanian Empire.svg Flag of Xyon.svg Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 03:16, October 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * Why is this even a debate? —  T  I   M  (TSW • AH • MGW • Contribs ) 03:17, October 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * * My longest yeah boy ever *
 * throw em off buildings <3
 * His name is Malik...
 * -Nova 08:11, October 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * Objectors
 * ​When you have to allude to the impeachment process because a user may end up being irresponsible, and with UR's past history, it is not a good sign. 03:06, October 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * ​When you have to allude to the impeachment process because a user may end up being irresponsible, and with UR's past history, it is not a good sign. 03:06, October 22, 2016 (UTC)


 * Discussion
 * Ladies and gentlemen of the wiki, I accept the nomination for the rank of Lieutenant. I feel that I have exercised my power with proper judgement, swiftness, and equality. I know I will be able to expand my efforts not just on chat, but the wiki as a whole. Thank you, Edge, for nominating me for Lieutenant. 03:18, October 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * ​I would also like to ask what LT processes currently need fulfilled? Has UR shown a dedication to the maintenance of the wiki overall, outside of chat? I'll concede he has a couple of decent TLs under his belt, but is this nomination really needed, and is UR the first one to correct formating errors, etc.? I don't think so. 03:09, October 22, 2016 (UTC)

Rules

 * Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (Please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
 * Nominated user must explain why he or she wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.
 * They are a Lieutenant.
 * They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
 * They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * Registered users' votes must have a three-fourths super majority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a three-fourths super majority for nomination to be accepted.
 * You must also include the date in your nomination.
 * They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Current Nominations
Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.

===Name of Editor===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Impeachment
It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

 * User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
 * If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment, with support of at least one TSTPF member.
 * Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
 * Registered users' votes must have two-third super majority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
 * TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-third super majority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons
There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:
 * They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
 * They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
 * They have have not been fair, restrained and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
 * They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

'''One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.'''

Current Impeachments
===Name of TSPTF Member===

*Supporters

*Objectors

*Discussion

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.