While I'm decently sure that Finland would've lost the winter war without support, what do you reckon would've occured if the French-British plan to aid the Finns succeded? Just curious.
60,640Pages
ALL POSTS
Ehh. As Sean, said, unlikely.
In any case, the two together COULDN'T beat the Allies. Wasn't till the 50s that the Sovs gained real power projection beyond their borders, and even that was mainly caused by WWII.
(edited by GunsnadGlory)
good point, but it is notable that the Nazis and Soviets did sign a non-agreession pact, so it is not unreasonable to assume they would work together against the Allies. But again, any such alliance would be shaky at best. The Soviets would switch sides when it looked like the Allies would win. I once read that the two almost did become Allies, but Hitler acted like Hitler. So if the Allies had intervented, the Soviets would have joined the Axis SOLELY to fight the Allies. But of course, the mistrust between the Axis would have been their undoing.
(edited by Spartian300)
No, the Soviets agreed to attack Poland with Germany. Nothing about an alliance. The NAP was mainly because they distrusted each other a lot, allying to fight the Allies would have a very small chance.
And, like Guns said, the Soviets really weren't that major. They defeated Germany mainly because of the winter. The Germans had already occupied a lot of Eastern Europe.
(edited by TechnicallyIAmSean)
They defeated Germany because the German tanks were outclassed by Soviet ones, and the Soviets mass produced these. The war only helped to accelerate the Soviet industrial development, allowing it to outproduce and outfight the Germans.
(edited by Imperium Guy)
No, Impo. The Tanks that the Germans COULD mass produce were outclassed by the Sovs. But the Tigers and the Panthers were AMAZING tanks. They outclassed even the T-34 monsters that the Soviets threw forward. But the Germans had too few of them.
Plus, the German training was WAYYYYY better.
As a wise man once said, it's not the size that counts- it's whether you know how to use it.
(edited by GunsnadGlory)
if it had just been the Germans and Soviets, they would have fought one another to a standstill in Poland.
(edited by Spartian300)
Standstill? Nah. Russians had numbers and raw resources. Germany spent most of WWII slowly running out of oil to power their tanks with.
The Soviets would, slowly, have pushed the Germans back. Poland's gone, ditto around a third of what we called East Germany.
(edited by GunsnadGlory)
Well, Numbers are moot if the soldiers lack training. Thus, the Soviets would be sending their troops into a bloodbath.
(edited by Spartian300)
The Soviets would've won that 1v1.
(edited by A Fandom user)
Well, Spar, history kinda proves you wrong.
In individual battles, yes. Eventually, though...
(edited by GunsnadGlory)