While I'm decently sure that Finland would've lost the winter war without support, what do you reckon would've occured if the French-British plan to aid the Finns succeded? Just curious.
60,632Pages
ALL POSTS
Standstill? Nah. Russians had numbers and raw resources. Germany spent most of WWII slowly running out of oil to power their tanks with.
The Soviets would, slowly, have pushed the Germans back. Poland's gone, ditto around a third of what we called East Germany.
(edited by GunsnadGlory)
Well, Numbers are moot if the soldiers lack training. Thus, the Soviets would be sending their troops into a bloodbath.
(edited by Spartian300)
The Soviets would've won that 1v1.
(edited by A Fandom user)
Well, Spar, history kinda proves you wrong.
In individual battles, yes. Eventually, though...
(edited by GunsnadGlory)
How long would it have lasted, do yout think?
(edited by Spartian300)
Which? Germany v Russia, or Germany + Russia v Britain +US?
(edited by GunsnadGlory)
Germany v Russia.
(edited by Spartian300)
Depends. If Hitler and Stalin remain in power throughout, Germany loses around 3-4 years in. If Hitler's idiocy is enough to enflame the Wehrmacht, you get something like a successful July 20th maybe two years in, and then the Wehrmacht, who actually know what they're doing, proceed to kill enough Russians to force a ceasefire in Mid-Poland, 6 or so years in.
(edited by GunsnadGlory)
Amount Of dead?
(edited by Spartian300)
Millions. Absolute Bloodbath, we're talking something like 20 million, mostly Russian.
(edited by GunsnadGlory)