Alternative History:Request for user rights

This page is for requests to join the TSPTF. Currently there is no set limit to the number of Constables. There can only be one administrator for every 1000 articles (Lieutenants and Brass combined). Calls for new administrators will be made each time a new one is needed or a current administrator has retired.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Only registered users with 200 or more edits and at least two months on this wiki will be allowed to vote in the user nominations or to nominate candidates.

Constable Request

Rules

• You may nominate another editor so long as they accept the nomination first.
• You cannot nominate yourself.
• Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
• Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Constable.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow editor to be a constable.

• They have an account under a username.
• They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
• They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
• Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted.
• TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
• You must also include the date in your nomination.
• They must also not have had a nomination fail or been blocked in the last six months.

Current Nominations

Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.
===[[Name of Editor]]===

*'''Supporters'''

*'''Objectors'''

*'''Discussion'''

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Person67

Person has been a very active contributor on the wiki in the last few months. He has helped the mods on nummerous occasions with situations regarding vandals and has helped us moderate things. I think it's high time he would be nominated for this. Therefore, I nominate him for the position of constable.              Deadly State of Mind Leader of the Knights of Scraw.  20:23, April 5, 2018 (UTC)

• Supporters:
  • Oh, I didn't mean to push that button! † Oh, well leave a message I guess 01:39, April 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 23:47, April 22, 2018 (UTC) - I see no reason not to support his elevation to constable. Seems like a pretty legit choice for the role to me.
  • Steph (talk)
  • – † ⌒⌒⌒＼(;ᄋ;＼)三(ﾉ>ᄉ<)ﾉ ~ ("니가먼저키스해!")
  • User:Mr.Orwell
  • GBUSA
  • Feudy McPlagueface (talk)
  •                The night is dark and full of terrors. 
  • I am that guy (talk) 18:29, April 28, 2018 (UTC)
  • Tullin - I support it but i suggest sometimes trimming on the harsh speaches

• Objectors:
  • Curmudgeonly yours - Crim 19:27, April 22, 2018 (UTC) - Racist and inflammatory. No thanks.
  • Already threatening action before his mom goes thru. OCT MARIUS, Hail Marius
  • Stepintime
• Discussion: Well, I didn't think AM would do it when he first suggested it to me. I mean yeah I already spend way to much of my life doing nothing in particular on this wiki, being a constable would give me a better excuse to avoid studying and chill here. I think I am a reasonably calm and almost respected user if not occasionally annoying person which makes for good constable qualities, I am also on European timezone which makes me good for the lack of active European mods when things need sorting. I also 'helped' fix that stupid thing where no one could make new articles by just going straight to CC and asking them to fix it. User:Person67

And it is for these reasons that I support Person's elevation to constable. He has proven himself to be resourceful when the need called for decisive action, and he has an active presence within the community that is felt by the other members of the wiki. I see no one else better suited to the role than Person as of the current date. Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 19:30, April 23, 2018 (UTC)

@Crim: Ok now I respect your right to vote whatever way you wish but let's not let my different political opinions be a stain upon my character when you consider the amount of racist and inflammatory mods we already have. They're my opinions which I am entitled to and they're not extreme even for the moderators we have. You want to vote on way fine there are a lot of reason to object but I don't apologise for having opinions contrary to yours. User:Person67

I'm sorry that it seems like I'm voting against you because I disagree with you politically; I assure you that is not my intention. You are free to practice whatever political ideology you please. However, understand that racism should not be tolerated at all by anyone on the wiki, least of all on the TSPTF. To understand that it seems to be practiced by members of the TSPTF is thoroughly upsetting. I encourage anyone who sees such behavior to report it and it will be dealt with appropriately, mod or no. Curmudgeonly yours - Crim 03:55, April 24, 2018 (UTC)

Crim, didn't you threaten to Gulag some of us at one point? Also, HELL YEAH BROTHER.

- HH (GBUSA)

Lieutenant Request

Rules

• You may nominate another editor so long as they accept the nomination.
• You cannot nominate yourself.
• Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
• Nominated user must explain why he wants to be a Lieutenant.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

• They have an account under a username.
• They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
• They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
• They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
• They have had at least some major article contributions.
• They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
• They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
• Registered users' votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted.
• TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-thirds super majority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
• You must also include the date in your nomination.
• They must also have not had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Current Nominations

Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.
===[[Name of Editor]]===

*'''Supporters'''

*'''Objectors'''

*'''Discussion'''

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Brass Requests

Rules

• Brass may be nominated here purely by another Lieutenant or Brass. (Please ensure they accept the nomination first)
• You cannot nominate yourself.
• Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.
• Nominated user must explain why he or she wants to be part of the Brass.

To view past requests, see the archive.

Requirements

There are some basic things to consider when nominating a Lieutenant for promotion.

• They are a Lieutenant.
• They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
• They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
• They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained and constructive manner.
• They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
• Registered users' votes must have a three-fourths super majority for brass status to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
• TSPTF members’ votes must have a three-fourths super majority for nomination to be accepted.
• You must also include the date in your nomination.
• They must also not have had a nomination fail in the last six months.

Current Nominations

Please copy and past this format for your own nomination.
===[[Name of Editor]]===

*'''Supporters'''

*'''Objectors'''

*'''Discussion'''

Note: Please put new nominations at the bottom.

Impeachment

It is entirely possible that a member of the TSTPF may neglect his duties and/or abuse their power. If this happens they must have their user rights removed. To keep it fair, the following procedure has been adopted.

Rules

• User who feels a TSPTF member should be impeached from his position, must first contact the TSPTF on their talk page with their complaint and attempt to work out the issue with them.
• If user refuses to accept any compromise from the TSTPF he may then bring up the TSPTF member for impeachment, with support of at least one TSTPF member.
• Impeaching user must explain why he thinks the TSPTF member should have his user rights removed.
• Registered users' votes must have two-third super majority to impeach a TSPTF member (Only users who have been registered for over a month — from the day the nomination is put forth — are counted).
• TSPTF members’ votes must have a two-third super majority to impeach a TSPTF member.

To view past impeachments, see the archive.

Reasons

There are only a few recognized reasons why a TSPTF member should have his user rights removed:

• They are not actively participating as a member of the TSPTF.
• They have not been carrying out the responsibilities they volunteered for.
• They have have not been fair, restrained and/or constructive in their dealings with other editors.
• They consistently refuse to follow the conventions and guidelines of this community.

One of these reasons alone is probably not enough to impeach a TSPTF member. Consider that before demanding an impeachment.

Current Impeachments

===[[Name of TSPTF Member]]===

*'''Supporters'''

*'''Objectors'''

*'''Discussion'''

Note: Please put new impeachments at the bottom.