Alternative History




  • Supporters
  1. Owen1983 September 6, 2010
  2. We sure do need more constables, you've got my vote.--Vladivostok 16:30, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
  3. I'm going to support this, because as Vlad said, more constables are always needed. But I just can't shake the suspicion that Owen made this nomination to gain favor with Smoggy, which he hopes to pool for leverage in his preferred operating region (Northern England) in 1983:DD. That said I might just be being suspicious. Fegaxeyl 16:49, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
  4. I agree with Fegaxeyl, but like he said we do always need more constablesVegas adict 20:07, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
  5. I agree we do need more Constables given the fact we have two & there is great instability in the ranks. Plus Smoggy sounds like a wonderfully qualified candidate and will do a great job I'm sure. --GOPZACK 20:16, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
  6. I'll support this - you've done good work in Britain. And note that I agree with Fegaxyl about Owen. Lordganon 03:54, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Tbguy1992 16:20, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion

she has been here a while and she helps people out

Smoggy must accept this nomination for it to be valid. Mitro 19:09, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

What would i have to do to be one?--Smoggy80 16:31, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

You would be granted rollback power to help you fight vandals and trolls. Mitro 16:37, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Sounds ok to me i accept the nomination--Smoggy80 15:27, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Guys even if Owen nominated Smoggy to get in her good graces, it means nothing. First, I doubt Smoggy would be easily swayed by Owen like that. Second, Smoggy being a Constable has no affect on the operation of 1983: Doomsday anyway. Mitro 04:03, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Just to let you all know Owen nominating me will not sway me one bit in his favour. I'm just not that shallow or gullible ;) --Smoggy80 15:40, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

So long as you're aware and remember that that's likely what he was trying for. Lordganon 16:13, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Yes! It's great that we finally have someone that can't be easily influenced.... or, at least, I hope so. Tbguy1992 16:20, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Owen has told me that he is doing it because he thinks Smoggy is a good editor, not as a move to gain favour. Fegaxeyl 16:30, September 9, 2010 (UTC)


Hey guys, I was wondering if you guys agree that we need more constables around here, and Lordganon came to my mind. He is a very good editor and very vibrant in the 1983: Doomsday timeline, and is known for his plausible articles which often explore the "backgrounds" of the nations of this timeline. His works are terrific and he always, always has something to say and is always eager to help out. His main problem is how he words things, I find it that he is very sarcastic and sharp-tongued at times, and could possibly ban someone if he got into an argument with them, but nevertheless I think he would make a good member of the Constabulary. Tell me what you think. Arstar 19:42, October 8, 2010 (UTC)

  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • Well he will reach his six months in 2 days, so I see no reason to not keep this nomination open. That being said, LG still needs to accept this nomination for it to be valid and I would like to hear about his willingness to root out vandalism and trolls. Mitro 19:54, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
    • So long as LG accepts he will be a great addition to the TSPTF and I disagree with this "main problem" noted above. We need more straight talkers. --Zack 21:18, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
    • Thank you for the consideration guys. I do accept it. I've always sought to root out vandals and trolls in my travels around the internet, as a couple of you may have seen around here the few times I've undid vandalism. A task I enjoy, too. I do try to avoid arguments, though I do tend to have a bit of a short fuse sometimes - not than I've ever banned anyone for fighting with me from anything I've modded before, mind. Lordganon 07:12, October 9, 2010 (UTC)
    • Since there does not appear to be any objections to this nomination, any objections to waiving the 2 weeks rules? Mitro 19:46, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
    • My take would be that if we say two weeks, we should do two weeks. It's just four more days. Benkarnell 20:22, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Red VS Blue

Red has shown through his work on the Stirling Awards that he is willing and able to serve the community and improving the wiki as a whole. Thus I nominate him to be a constable in the TSPTF. Mitro 14:00, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

  • Supporters
    • I have to admit, I was surprised to find out that he wasn't already a member. Lordganon 17:19, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
  • Acceptance
    • Thank you, Mitro, for honoring me with a nomination for a position on the TSPTF. I am more than happy to take on the post of Constable in order to do my part in the moderation of this fine wikia. Though I have been pleased lately at the ebbing of acts of vandalism, mostly on account of the expulsion of two particularly nefarious individuals, it is likely that the continued addition of new articles will make the normal vandalism rate on here grow in the future. Therefore, as succinctly put as possible: I accept. Red VS Blue 22:46, January 17, 2011 (UTC)


Despite his age, I still want this guy on the TSPTF. His strong support of plausible actions in the Map Games, a place not known for plausibility, makes him a great candidate to be a Constable. Mitro 20:31, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

  • Supporters
    • Tbguy1992 21:56, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
    • Lordganon 22:24, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
    • Oerwinde 00:17, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
    • [[] 00:33, February 12, 2011 (UTC)- I think you would be a great TSPTF member!
    • BrianD 21:32, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
    • Smoggy80 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
    • KingSweden 20:02, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
    • Roguejedi 20:17, February 17, 2011 (UTC) - I think he should definatly get the position, as he is always the more plausible and thoughtful of the people that play the map games. He always is fair and he would be a great help to the wiki.
    • Katholico 20:47, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
    • VENEZUELA 20:58, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
    • Fedelede 23:25, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
    • Zack 01:32, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
  • I accept the nomination, thank you. BoredMatt 20:51, February 12, 2011 (UTC)


Sorry guys, I forgot to write my reasons. I'd like to start with his motivation. When he decides to do something, he's hell-bent on doing it, provided he doesn't get bored. When there's a situation, he wants a fair resolve to it. As he is my brother, I can definitely say that he is a great, moral person. He's the kind of person you can hang around with, and he loves this site. He visits almost every day. Whether or not he's remembering to log in is another thing, but he just loves it here.

As for people thinking this is some sort of sock-puppet deal, just stop. We really are two different people. As for what I said, I hope you guys aren't taking that the wrong way. I simply meant he doesn't like giving up. Crimson, hang in there! ~1000monkeys

  • Supporters
    • I, for one, welcome our shade-of-red canstabulary member to rule over us, and think that any violence assumptions of foul play on our part would be superfluous and rude. We can never have too many constables, after all. Jazon Naparleon 00:26, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
  • Objectors
    • Certainly is suspicious. The possibility of abusing multiple accounts is there (how do we really know Crimson and Monkeys are two different people). The fact that Monkeys has yet to return to explain why he picked Crimson. I also am a little concerned by something Monkeys said about Crimson: "He's pretty cool, but very stubborn if you get him angry'." A TSPTF member needs to have control over his emotions and not make decisions simply because someone made him angry. Mitro 13:21, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
    • Crim, if the nomination had been done in any other way, I'd support it. But since it was your brother that nominated you, I can't. I really do think that you would do a good job, though. But as it stands, I just can't support this. Lordganon 03:10, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    • For this nomination to be valid, Crimson needs to accept it. As far as I can tell, he has not been contacted about it. 1000Monkeys, please inform Crimson that you nominated him to be a Constable. Mitro 19:26, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
    • Whoa! Thank you so much, man! I'm honored to accept the nomination! CrimsonAssassin 21:53, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
    • One little problem. 1000Monkeys is Crimson's little brother, and he sometimes uses his account.
    • Is this true? Matt
    • I don't use 1000Monkey's account. Why would I? I see no reason to. But yes, he is my brother. Also, I don't overreact when I'm angry, I just don't give up. CrimsonAssassin 19:58, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
    • Well, I have no evidence on it, I'll just have to trust Crimson not to do it, it's just that he could. After all, Monkeys has taken Crimson's side on every map game he's played. Anyways, besides, I don't think he's qualified enough to be a part of the TSPTF.
    • Oh, and he's only been around since September, which means he barely qualifies for the Constable, but I don't think he's experienced enough, and I've never really quite seen him really "battling" vandalism.
    • Also, 1000Monkeys has been gone since February. Then, he comes back, makes two edits, both to hominate Crimson, and bam! No more edits. He didn't even tell Crimson on his talk page he was nominated! (Although he could have told him IRL). Anyways, I'm not sure about all of this.
    • Look, I decided to come back. I saw the TSPTF and saw Crimson qualified, so I nominated him. Also, I just wanted to agree with Crimson on map games. We both know that if we try going to war, there will be fighting. I did tell Crimson I nominated him IRL. 1000Monkeys 00:15, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
    • This is a discussion page over if Crimson should be in the TSPTF, not whether or not I really exist IRL (This is rediculous, people. I mean really.) ~1000
    • There is no need for that edit log, nor for talking about any of this here. Sign your responses, and cut it out on here. Lordganon 03:08, March 21, 2011 (UTC)


Owner has been an editor of the wiki since last spring. Despite my issues with him, especially early on, I consider him to be quite good at writing alternate history, and he's always willing to consider advice and pointers. He gives them when he feels that they are needed, as well. I've seen him undo vandals a few times, and consider him a good person to work with as well. As such, I nominate him for the position of Constable in the TSPTF. Lordganon 09:18, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • I accept my nomination for the position of Constable. Ownerzmcown 19:16, March 29, 2011 (UTC)
    • I would like to be a constable simply for the purpose of having more responsibility for this website I have dedicated much of the last 9 months to. Ownerzmcown 19:18, March 30, 2011 (UTC)


Fed has been a good, solid contributor for a very, very long time. I was amazed that he was not already in the TSPTF. While I have never really seen him fight vandals, I think he will make a valuable addition to the TSPTF

  • Supporters
    • Not very good of you to grab this rug out from under me Pita, since I asked him and you ran with it, but I support it. Lordganon 01:54, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
    • Jazon Naparleon 23:03, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
    • Katholico 23:40, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
    • BrianD 02:04, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
    • Matt
    • Smoggy80 17:14, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • Well, actually, I was going to yesterday, I just didn't have a chance because my computer crashed right before I asked him. I forgot until now, and was about to ask him, then saw your post!
    • We'll need more of these guys with Mitro gone, and Fed seems as good as anyone. Gung Ho! Jazon Naparleon 01:59, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thank you very much. I accept the nomination. I'd like to accept this nomination, because I think that, if there's something that might be important for the wiki, and the internet as a whole, is the erradication of trolls and vandals, especially in order to keep a wiki safe and productive (I know this is not a good explanation of why I'd like to accept this nomination) Thank you very much for the nomination. Fed (talk) 02:00, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Mister Sheen

Sheen has been an editor of the wiki for a bit more than a year now. One of the primary contributors to the "Great White South" timeline, he has also contributed in some manner to several other of the community timelines. He's also shown a willingness to hep others. As such, I nominate him for the position of Constable. Lordganon 23:13, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • I accept the nomination, it would be good to have a few vandal-fighting abilities to help around the wiki. - Mister Sheen 11:38, May 20, 2011 (UTC)


Cheese has been an editor of the wiki for a little more than a year as well. Primarily, his work has been with his "Canadian Independence" timeline, but he has contributed to several community projects as well. He has shown himself to be willing to help others, as well as able to "keep cool" when someone opposes him. As such, I nominate him for the position of Constable. Lordganon 23:13, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • I'll accept the nomination. I think the vandalism is just plain annoying, so I'll try my best to stop it from happening. CheesyCheese 19:24, May 18, 2011 (UTC)


Feg is another long-standing editor of this wiki. Primarily, his editing does go towards Doomsday, but he's also started up several very unique ides for his own timelines. Has also proved very willing to give advice to others, as well. As such, I nominate him for the position of Constable. Lordganon 10:12, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • I'm very grateful for this nomination! Rollback was a very useful tool on my old wiki and I can assure you all that I'll put it to good and responsible use here. Fegaxeyl 10:16, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

Collie Kaltenbrunner

Collie has now been around the wiki for about 6 months, and by the time the 2 weeks pass, he will have been - and I've been waiting for it, lol. He's shown himself on the map games to be a fair moderator, and very level-headed, which is something we like to look for, as well as willing to help with advice. Good at settling disputes, and fair at it as well, he's also involved in several map games and has a few timelines of his own that he's working on. I think he's do well with the position, and that's why I'm nominating him for it. Lordganon 06:43, June 4, 2011 (UTC)


Aze has been around now for about a year and a half. One of the guys currently doing CYOAH, perhaps our most interesting phenomena, he's also a participant in the map games and has created a few of his own timelines as well. I've seen him help out others on several occasions, and his CYOAH work is something I find quite intriguing. As such, I nominate him for the position of Constable on this wiki. Lordganon 06:43, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

I accept this nomination. I am glad that I am seen as such an interesting person. I will work hard, help when neede, and will do my best to uphold the rules and regulations of this Wiki. I will do my best to live up to the high expectations set for me. Azecreth 20:56, June 4, 2011 (UTC)


  • Supporters
    • I believe that Kenny would indeed make an excellent constable. He has demonstrated that he is a great researcher and has worked tirelessly to meet the demands of administrators to bring his articles up to graduation level. SouthWriter 05:07, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
    • DK managed to create a well-regulated map game, and has managed to keep implausibility to a minimum. He's set the standards for what a good map game should be like. Yank 03:51, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
    • ChrisL123 22:41, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
    • I approveLxCaucassus 01:31, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
    • Fed (talk) 01:34, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
    • Oerwinde 04:18, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
    • BrianD 04:46, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
    • CrimsonAssassin 16:38, August 23, 2011 (UTC) - You're stubborn as all hell and make sure things happen your way. You belong in the TSPTF, brother!
    • CheesyCheese 16:08, August 25, 2011 (UTC)
  • Objectors
    • Kenny is neither level-headed, nor plausible. Call it me not liking him all you want - that is irrelevant here - but I don't consider him a good candidate. Lordganon 21:49, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    • Don't "think" anything. Have a good look around and you'll see what I mean. That's all I'm going to say on the matter. Lordganon 22:04, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
    • It so much IS relevant to this discussion, LG. You knew I would not stand by and let you put your personal feelings in the way of bringing on board such a bright young writer. It is not enough to just say someone is not a good candidate, some specific reason should be given. "Just look around" is not a good reason. SouthWriter 05:07, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
    • No, it is not. My personal feelings/preferences do not get in the way of admin work - remember me nominating you for your position? And just disagreeing with nominations has always been fine, thank you very much. Why do I oppose this? Because he is consistently biased and not plausible on many occasions. You've admitted as much yourself in the past, except the "consistently" part. At the SFA Map Game, he's been told at least a half dozen times that he's not being plausible by myself and Collie, yet he ignores it and gets mad at us for it. Add the Cast~ arguing to it, and it's worse. Should have known that you'd post something like that and start something, South - should remember that before I say things like "all I'm going to say." Sheesh. And, "just look around" was so I didn't have to quote examples, but I guess that's not good enough either. I did specifically state what my problem with it was, after all. Lordganon 07:09, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
    • I accept the nomination. Rights would help me deal with vandals more quickly and I could take a more active stand in the community. @LG I don't see how plausibility affects the basic role of the TSPTF, unless I wanted to hassle new users over the details of their articles, which I don't plan on doing. And no, I am not admitting implausibility, I am just stating. Detectivekenny (Info; Talk) 03:31, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
    • You fail to comprehend the concept. That simple. Lordganon 05:42, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
      • Although I admit I am human, I never considered myself detrimental to the community as you put me up to be by objecting. There are many other users, who, like me, pass up the occasional implausibility. But for some reason I choose to defend myself, and that is what you seem to have a problem with. I understand how important it is to protect your image and stay in power, LG, but I daresay, you've attested to your share of "mistakes" in SfA (I was the first to cry metagaming, but no matter, I suppose). I really don't see how I have any bad intentions or would bring harm to the community. Detectivekenny (Info; Talk) 06:29, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
      • Metagaming? You know full well that all of that was in response to you not having any idea what being realistic is. And the "mistakes" were Collie's, not mine. I stand by what I have said about you, on many occasions. You are not plausible, and have shown great bias on many occasions. And there's no way you're ever changing that. Lordganon 07:08, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
      • Why thank you, I am delighted to find I am genetically predisposed to implausibility. And how civil of you to put the blame on Collie. Detectivekenny (Info; Talk) 22:10, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
      • Thanks for putting words in my mouth. Again. And, if you look at the first maps, you'll find that are the errors were his, so there's nothing "false" being said, either. And now explicitly stating that you will try and remove me from my position for objecting? Are you kidding me? Am I not allowed to object? Lordganon 01:21, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
      • LG is allowed to object and his personal experiences with DK have led him to these conclusions and I think thats good enough and the arguments need to stop. I personally have had no bad interactions with DK, and his work on 1983: Doomsday and elsewhere have shown that his article quality is high and while he will rigorously defend his positions, he is willing to cooperate. Oerwinde 04:18, August 22, 2011 (UTC)


Chris is one of the newer editors on the wiki. While most of his activity as of late has been in the map games, he's also created a few timelines with interesting PoDs. More importantly, he does do his best to keep things peaceful, and I've seen him undo vandalism more than once, so the position can only help in that regard. As such, I nominate him for the position of constable in the TSPTF. Lordganon 01:58, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

  • Supporters
    • ChrisL123 has been very helpful and friendly on the map games which I am on with him, and he was a good moderator there. LurkerLordB 02:08, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
    • Azecreth 14:59, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
    • CrimsonAssassin 23:02, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
    • Fed (talk) 23:05, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
    • Mister Sheen 12:06, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
    • Katholico 15:47, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
    • I agree with LLB. He's a great guy. Just manage to keep up with homework ;D 1.png Imperium Guy 18:15, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • If I didn't say it before, thanks for the nomination, LG. I'd like to join the TSPTF because of the amount of vandalism I have already removed/undid, the effort and time I have put into the wiki, the respect I can offer to new and old users, and of course the responsibility I can handle. I believe that I can handle the responsibilities and make good use of my time as a constable. ChrisL123 02:11, December 1, 2011 (UTC)


Like Chirs, Hidan43vr is one of the newer editors on the wiki. He's the author/creator of L'Uniona Homanus, what may very well be the biggest timeline, even if added to sporadicly, started in a while on here. He's shown himself to be willing to fight vandals, and has also expressed quite a bit of concern about it in the past, as well. As such, I nominate him for the position of constable in the TSPTF. Lordganon 01:58, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

  • Supporters
    • LurkerLordB 23:04, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
    • Fed (talk) 23:05, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
    • -Kogasa Symbol of Natori, Miyagi.png宮城県.pngFlag of Japan.svg 11:53, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
    • --Smoggy80 16:58, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • I would be honored to become part of the TSPTF of a this site that I've found wonderful and exciting for some time. Thank you all Hidan43vr 17:36, December 4, 2011 (UTC)


Kogasa - or, 9 - is a pretty new editor around here. He's contributed to a few timelines, and established a few of his own. He even started up a Japanese version of our wiki. More importantly, he's gone out of his way to aid us quite a bit in fighting vandals. As such, I nominate him for the position of Constable in TSPTF. Lordganon 10:48, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

  • Supporters
    • Fights vandals, makes flags, knows our policies, helpful to other users, expands our communiy to other nations...what more could you ask for in a Constable? Mitro 14:39, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
    • LurkerLordB (Talk) 23:11, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
    • 1.png Imperium Guy 23:20, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
    • Katholico 03:48, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • I accept the nomination. I've helped fight off vandalism as fast as I can, and shall continue to do so, whatever it takes. Again, I thank you. -Kogasa Symbol of Natori, Miyagi.png宮城県.pngFlag of Japan.svg 11:12, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
    • By my count, it's been two weeks since January 27 has occured. LurkerLordB (Talk) 18:56, February 11, 2012 (UTC)


I've known him on this wiki for a long time. Here's a guy who's dedicated to the wiki. He's a regular patron at this fine establishment and has set some trends for Map Games. He gave us Axis vs. Allies and a Different History, among many other things. The guy's enthusiastic and very friendly. He's a helpful person and I can honestly see him fitting in well over at the TSPTF. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you pita. CrimsonAssassin 02:55, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • Honestly, Can't really go one way or the other here..... Crim by making the nomination, you cannot be a supporter. And, while not explicitly against the rules, it's definitely against our practices for someone who is not a member of the admin team to making nominations here. Lordganon 07:52, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
    • Okay, thanks for clearing that up. CrimsonAssassin 11:22, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
    • Okay, this is my first go at this, so lets give it a blast. Well, I will accept this nomination because I enjoy battling vandalism. I've seen too many vandals, and it would be good to talk with some authority over them. Also, I will try my best to moderate map games, since several of the newer ones are quite… implausible.


Enclave has been here, now, for a little over 6 months. He's started a few timelines of his own, participated in a few of the games, along with done some mediating long with general advice and admin work. I figure he'll do good at this. And, as such, I nominate him for the position of Constable in the TSPTF. Lordganon 22:25, April 6, 2012 (UTC)


  • Discussion
    • I've accept the nomination, as I've seen what happens when vandalizers and other people do to articles, and I want to help prevent that. Enclavehunter 22:32, April 6, 2012 (UTC)


Von's been a member of the wiki for a couple of years now. He's one of our more avid players of the games, a contributor to the 1983: Doomsday timeline, and the author of the Early World War I timeline. He's shown himself to be pretty reasonable, too. As such, I nominate him for the position of Constable in the TSPTF. Lordganon 23:43, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

  • Discussion
    • I'm surprised he wasn't part of the TSPTF already. IMPERIAL NY-SPQR 1.pngRegen Flag.png Syngraféas Enallaktikí̱ Istoría, Dic mihi lingua Anglorum. 23:57, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
    • I accept, thanks for nominating me :D VonGlusenburg (talk to Von!) 10:38, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
    • I hope my efforts in stopping vandalism, trolling, flaming and arguing on the Wiki will make it a better place for all you guys; and being made a Constable in the TSPTF should make it easier for me to do this. After all no one in our community wants it to be vandalised and full of conflict & arguing, so I will try harder now to stop these things from happening, and solving the problems behind them, thanks again --VonGlusenburg (talk to Von!) 15:12, April 8, 2012 (UTC).

Imperium Guy


  • Supporters
  • Objections
  • Discussion
    • If I remember correctly, don't we need Imperium Guy to accept his nomination? Azecreth 23:52, April 23, 2012 (UTC)
    • Yes, he will. Lordganon 00:12, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • Oh wow, I didn't realise I got nominated until Scan told me, so I'll give my acception a blast. I accept my nomination because I think I would be a good constable and try to do to my best to fight vandals and basically keep pages in order. This will also give me a slight position of power to moderate arguments (which I think I handle quite well). And thanks for the nomination (I got a slight feeling it was Dean or LG). 1.png Imperium Guy
    • Not me in the least. Imp, check the histories of articles, lol. Dean, read the rules more closely next time. Lordganon 08:23, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • Oh, thanks Dean. And yeah, I'll check the history next time, lol. 1.png Imperium Guy 17:04, April 26, 2012 (UTC)


I was doing some reaserch on the TSPTF and I noticed that he was already nominated, but for certain reasons I will not enumerate, he was rejected. I believe that he has in fact proven himself on this Wiki, and I truely believe that he should have been made a Constable way back when, but I understand the Comunity's doubt on his credibility. I hope that we will not let the past linger, and that Crimson's credibility and enough trust was gained to entrust him with the responsibilities of a TSPTF constable. He is a good guy, and judgingg from the Direct Contact I had with him on Principia Moderni, he seems to be an actualy nice guy, and I would have nominated him for Leitenant if the article number was right.

-Lx (leave me a message) 02:02, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

  • Supporters

\**Monster Pumpkin (talk) 02:13, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

  • Discussion

\**Same here. IMPERIAL NY-SPQR 1.pngRegen Flag.png Syngraféas Enallaktikí̱ Istoría, Dic mihi lingua Anglorum. 02:59, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

    • Thank you guys so much. I can't tell you how much thus means to me. I am honored to accept this nomination. Rest assured, you have nothing to worry about involving my credibility and honesty. As a side note, I'd like to say that I really feel like this community has had an impact on me. Not only am I even more interested in history than I was when I joined, but I am now constantly using the word 'implausible' in my every day life. Thanks again, Lx for the nomination! CrimsonAssassin (talk) 05:56, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
    • Lx, you nominated it. You can't sign up as a "supporter" too. As for the nomination itself... Sorry Crim, but I can't support it. Won't "object" to it, but I won't "support" it, either. And, don't forget to look at the last time he was nominated for the role when choosing "yay" or "nay." Lordganon (talk) 06:47, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
    • Though I understand your reservations, that happened over a year ago. CrimsonAssassin (talk) 12:22, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
    • Plus, I am pretty sure Lx is not one of Crim's off-hand stockpuppets! :P 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 13:12, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
    • Lx is irrelevant to my concerns - he merely signed as a supporter and posted it in the first place. Pita, you "glanced" at that point - you did not mention a still-valid concern. The passage of time is irrelevant. Lordganon (talk) 02:17, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • I say that since neither he (nor his "brother") nominated him for this position, and the fact that that's the only black spot on his reputation on the site, I can hardly say that I can see the necessity of bringing up that topic now of all times. IMPERIAL NY-SPQR 1.pngRegen Flag.png Syngraféas Enallaktikí̱ Istoría, Dic mihi lingua Anglorum. 02:28, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • I have to agree with Scrawland. Seriously, LG, stating that was a problem here in a situation that has nothing to do with 1000 Monkeys is a bit exaggerated. Fed (talk) 02:36, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • Crimson, I also have found myself to be using implausible in daily conversation as well! I use it now along with improbable, which I got from the Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy. LurkerLordB (Talk) 02:41, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • I mentioned not one word of what the problem was last time. Not one. Lordganon (talk) 03:06, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • And no one said you did. The fact that you advised everyone else to glance at last time's issue before voting is what we're discussing. IMPERIAL NY-SPQR 1.pngRegen Flag.png Syngraféas Enallaktikí̱ Istoría, Dic mihi lingua Anglorum. 03:12, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • It's sort of funny that last time, LordGanon said "Crim, if the nomination had been done in any other way, I'd support it. But since it was your brother that nominated you, I can't. I really do think that you would do a good job, though. But as it stands, I just can't support this." LurkerLordB (Talk) 03:14, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • The first time someone is nominated is very valid when they are nominated again. Nor did I say it was a "problem," per se. And you and Fed did suggest that I said it. Lurk? Opinions change. Lordganon (talk) 03:19, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • But did you change your opinion of him because of what happened last time, or because of something else? If there is something else, you should state it, as it could affect whether other people support him. LurkerLordB (Talk) 03:22, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • No net reason. Lordganon (talk) 04:49, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • I think voting is over. CrimsonAssassin (talk) 01:08, August 10, 2012 (UTC)


I'm not sure if I'm allowed to nominate someone, but I'd like to nominate Mscoree for constable. He’s a great help to everyone, both within his extensive map game, Night of the Living Alternate History, and on the wiki in general. I’ve seen first hand that he’s pretty dedicated to the wiki and he’s a pretty good writer. He cooperates well and I think he’d make a good addition to the admin team. Edboy452 (talk) 04:34, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

  • Discussion
    • Nomination not valid unless the user in question accepts it. Lordganon (talk) 06:46, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
    • I have removed Ed's name from the support list, as you cannot sign up to support a nomination you make, as well as Tykur, who has not been on the wiki for the necessary month yet. Remember, you need to have a hundred or more edits and have been here at least a month to be able to vote on such things. Tykur, you may add your vote again on the 17th, and no earlier. Lordganon (talk) 06:52, July 12, 2013 (UTC)
    • LG I will not argue with you about the following, but I wish to take this opportunity to make a statement. I have wanted to say this for quite some time now. If it results in my blocking then... I'm not sure I care anymore, though i would like to appeal or at least say farewell to my friends. Please bear in mind I have gone out of my way to make the following statement as inoffensive as possible, whilst including my feelings: Since he joined Mscoree has been a great asset to my development on the wiki. He has been consistently polite and respectful to me, given constructive criticism where needed and warm encouragement when I took ideas to him. He has kept an ASB map game terrifyingly plausible. No mean feat. His sense of humour has caused me to smile on more than one occasion. So we have here a user who is human. In every sense of the word. Broken yes, but let he who is without sin cast the first stone. No takers? Quelle surprise! He is approachable, hard working (an edit count of 3752 edit at the time of typing) and plausible. He may be a new class of user, but I think we need more like him. Lordganon however has if I'm honest, slightly terrified me. His propensity for scaring of new users appears large, at least from the standpoint of a new user. If I come to him with an idea, I come back with an answer, and a highly detailed one at that, which I applaud. However it is always why it can't be done. It may be that all my idea's are ASB, but neither does he give any sort of ' I-can-see-what-you-are-trying-to-do-so-here's-how-you-could-plausibly-achieve-at-least-something-similar'. I find him often rude in his responses, and whist his usefulness in terms of general editing cannot be denied I find him too much like Javert (I will assume the reader has a modicum of intelligence. If not then he is from Les Miserables). There is, I admit a time and place for such actions, but surely not on a wiki! I mean not that he should be banned, only I ask, indeed, Lordganon I know you will read this, I beg of you, accept us for who we are. Only Human. Valjean, the thief, helped much. Let Mscoree be. Yes, even a Constable. David Rain (Sometimes...) (talk) 18:45, July 12, 2013 (UTC)
    • I can't begin to state how much this made my day. Thank you so much for the kind words, and for everyone who supported me. Truth be told, I wouldn't be able to do any of this without the support and help you guys show. It would be my pleasure to return the favor by helping people as a constable. I gladly accept the nomination, and hope people can find it in their hearts to give me a chance. Sure maybe I use humor and other unconventional methods, but as a constable I'd be focused on the betterment of the wiki. P. S. David Rain wins for being the first one to post Pink Floyd. Thanks, Mscoree (talk) 21:37, July 12, 2013 (UTC)
    • ...Why on earth would you get blocked for that, DR? There's is not a single thing against the rules there. More or less the entire thing is wholly irrelevant to this, but there's nothing against the rules in it, though the "intelligence" remark comes very close to being insulting. As for the content... Quite frankly, the only part that's accurate is/was the edit count. Both of you two - follow the layout. Lordganon (talk) 09:15, July 14, 2013 (UTC)
    • When does voting close?         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo! 
    • From the top of this page: "Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day." Let's hope common sense prevails. --NFSreloaded (talk) 18:22, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
    • Right, well two more days.         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo! 
    • Voting is officially closed. 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 22:17, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
    • He didn't achieve a 2/3 majority in either category, so he isn't a constable, correct?         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo! 


Well, to be honest, this has to be pretty self-explanatory. Take a look at the TSPTF talk page and you will see for yourself why. He has brought to our attention a good deal of vandalism. Things he cannot undo or involve blocking, he has alerted the admins to pretty quickly. He is a well-liked member of the community, and also does have under him a timeline which is expanding at a good rate (Myomi Republic). I really do feel he would be a very good addition to the TSPTF. As such, I nominate him for the position of Constable in the TSPTF. 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 12:50, August 10, 2013 (UTC)

  • Discussion
    • Thank you very much, Imp, I never imagined I would get this nomination. I am truly honored to accept this nomination. Maybe my efforts and works on this wiki will limited by my poor English. However, I will work really hard for this wiki, regardless the consequences I will accepted and the weakness I already possessed. I promise to put down any vandalism strictly and harshly. I love this wiki and I love Alternate History, I will work hardly and laboriously for the betterment of this wiki. God save the Queen! FirstStooge (talk) 13:11, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
    • God Save the Queen! XD 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 13:13, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
    • Or, as Zoltan put it, Gud zav ze Kwin!         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo! 
    • You know you deserve the position when LG supports you. ;) 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 19:39, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
    • True.         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo! 
    • And you know you don't when he doesn't, lol.             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR   16:38, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
    • Well, not for sure. Look at Crim, he deserved it (imo) but LG went against it. (Though he did have a black mark with the 1000monkeys thing) Guns, who is too lazy to go to source mod and type out his real sig. (talk) 15:05, August 14, 2013 (UTC)
    • To be fair, I made it clear in Crim's case that I was neutral on it. Lordganon (talk) 11:59, August 15, 2013 (UTC)
    • Perfectly true, and I'm not saying you weren't justified.         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo! 
    • It's a shame that debacle is still being brought up, though it's understandable at the same time. Regarding FirstStooge, he'd make an excellent addition to the TSPTF. CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes" 13:38, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • So...the vote was ended? FirstStooge (talk) 01:54, August 27, 2013 (UTC)
    • Yes, I think so. Congratulations.             Regen Flag.png   "Fear the power of the Dark Side of the Force."  02:39, August 27, 2013 (UTC)
    • Thank you very much, Scraw. :) FirstStooge (talk) 04:18, August 27, 2013 (UTC)


Well, Bfoxius was going to do this, but he hasn't gotten round to it, so I'll jump the gun and do it myself. 

Scraw is a prominent member of our wiki. He is universally liked and respected, and has two timelines of his own, both of which he actually works on and develops (unlike me =P). He would be an excellent addition to the TSPTF in my opinion, and I thus nominate him for the position opf Constable.         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo! 

  • Supporters:
  • Objectors:
  • Discussion:
  • Hrm, uh, without getting too cheesy and sappy, I'll make it blunt. I am more than happy to accept this position and it will most certainly aid in making undoing, reverting, and fixing that weird code that happens when you have an edit conflict in map games easier. I am also grateful for just my nomination and will do my best to remain humble and help maintain order on this wiki.             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR   19:50, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • Lol. Most users talk about fighting vandals. Yout alk about 'fixing that weird code that happens when you have an edit conflict in map games'. *shakes head* Guns, who is too lazy to go to source mod and type out his real sig. (talk) 13:23, August 20, 2013 (UTC)
  • Hey, somebody has to do it. :P And I think combating vandalism and trolls is an obligatory duty of every user on a wiki.             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR   17:51, August 20, 2013 (UTC)
  • I think you don't need to be a constable to fix edit conflict problems. The one and only Guns, who is too lazy to go to source mod and type out his real sig. (talk) 12:47, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • Scraw is an active user and ready to undertake the responsibilities of the TSPTF. CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes" 13:43, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • To be frank, undoing is a pain in the rear. Rollback is quick, and you don't risk having a second conflict. Regardless, I will do my best to uphold all of my duties and responsibilities.             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR   00:58, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
  • It's almost been two weeks, and I don't really think anything is going to change here. The one and only Guns, who is too lazy to go to source mod and type out his real sig. (talk) 08:52, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
  • Is he Constable now?Mafia (talk) 12:20, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
  • No. Two weeks have not passed. The amount of support is irrelevant. Lordganon (talk) 13:56, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
  • Precisely. Rules are rules folks, although I don't think mucg is going to change either, lol. 2nd September should be when Scraw gets moved up if I is correct. 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 14:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
  • The second is the last day of the voting period. It'll be the third he can get moved up on. Lordganon (talk) 09:30, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
  • It is already September 3rd on my place. FirstStooge (talk) 09:28, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

Monster Pumpkin

MP has been part of the wiki for about a year and a half now and has proven to be one of the more level-headed users on this site, especially in the map games section. Level-headed certainly comes in handy, which leads me to believe that he would be a great addition to the TSPTF. MP is a well-liked user with two personal timelines that he's been working on as well.

~ CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes" 02:34, October 18, 2013 (UTC)

  • Objectors

Local Mafia Boss

Local is a very active member in our map game community, works hard on his timeline One of Many deaths and over seems like the kinda person that would not abuse his roll. He has 2000+ edits and has been on the wiki for 8+ mounths and seems here to stay.

Flag of Russian Alaska (HR).svg OCT MARIUS, HAIL HIM User talk:Octavian Marius 20:22, October 28, 2013 (UTC)


Viva is a highly regarded member of many communities, including several map games. He has been on the wiki for years and is both active and plausible(ish). He is an expert on all things Africa, and I do believe that he has his own TL. Despite past altercations, I feel he would be an excellent member of the TSPTF, and would not abuse his powers. Vote for Life! (Geddit, cos Viva means life...)         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo! 


Well, Mscoree is a wonderful user who tries really hard to keep this wiki going at all times. He is in the top ten editors and has shown dedication to be on there, with his map game Night of the Living Alternate History joining one of the elite in finishing successfully. He is very active and his Doomsday articles are good even though they still have a few problems. He has also worked very hard on his Yellowstone articles and has helped expand the timeline considerably. He is seen as a generally positive influence on the Community TL. He was nominated once when he was slight immature, but he has really improved since then, and has begun attempts to build bridges with users he was fallen out with in the past. He is a great guy helping me out whenever I need help and even when I am super annoying. He also helps to put spam pages up for deletion and helps out to tell about annoying anons. That is why I believe Ms should be Constable.  Flag of Russian Alaska (HR).svg OCT MARIUS, HAIL HIM User talk:Octavian Marius 01:36, November 20, 2013‎

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
    • Sorry, still feel like you're lacking in the customer relations department.             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR  
    • I like him, but he's (no offense intended) an idiot. He has experience but just isn't ready for this, as he proved with his actions on the TSPTF talkpage. Guns
    • Not a single one of those claims, OM, were actually true. Lordganon (talk) 12:20, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • NFSreloaded (talk) 21:14, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • Katholico (talk) 22:37, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    • Regardless of very obvious historical issues he has had with people i believe he has shaped up well, and would be a great addition as constable, ive had a great time getting things together for the Yellowstone TL with him and have seen noticeable improvement in behavior. The Unchallenged Conqueror #FP (Talk to Me)
    • Mscoree seems to be a great and active contributor to our wiki. Despite problems in the past, he has become much more active and mature in the time following his previous nomination. He frequently works on many timelines, and has modded in many map games, is the top non-TSPF contributor besides Iwaschris, and helps people out around the wiki, most notably adding categories, and frequently giving feedback on pages. Due to this, I believe he should be made Constable. Phyrexia symbol.png Yawgmoth, Lord of the Wastes Phyrexia symbol.png
    • He seems pretty fair, and has good grammar (more than I can say about other people on this wiki), and he's a friend. For these reasons (and ulterior motives) I support him fully. Daxus Inferno (talk) 01:52, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    • I support him out of principle. The Hurian Database Wiki Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 03:31, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    • Time is not something that everyone has. NonEuclidean (talk) 13:20, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    • Except for Time Lords. 20px Labarum.jpg CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes"
    • I like him, but he's clearly not ready. I mean, remember his thing- not even a month ago - on the TSPTF page? Every Silver Lining has its Cloud...  (And here I am!)
    • What thing? You mean when I made an appeal to the TSPTF in accordance with the rules? Mscoree (talk) 20:52, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    • How much longer can you possibly wait? You never are ready, just ready enough, as they say. MS has demonstrated an unprecedented and unrivaled dedication to the wiki, at one point even making over 1,000 edits in one week. He has dozens of pages, in dozen of timelines. There's a reason that new contributors contact him as opposed to some of the admins on the site. NonEuclidean (talk) 21:11, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    • So, a lot has already been said about Ms. I sincerely consider him to be a great guy, although I wasn't his friend right away. We were not too close, but he was a leader of a whole community, which he still (arguably) can be said to lead. He has been recognized through NotLAH and now FMG. He helps a ton with YS. Frequently on chat, he really gets a chance to communicate with the users of this wiki. Lately, his behavior (I spelled it the British way on accident first!), not that it was bad to start with, has really been worthy of the TSPTF. He is a great guy, as I have said. He has my full support, and I wish the TSPTF considers Ms as he is now - a thing I feel is important for all users nominated to the office. Thanks you for hearing me out! He has my vote, and I hope he has your vote also. [User:Reximus55] [User talk:Reximus55] 22:25, November 20, 2013 (UTC) (Does LG get a vote, since that would be a bit biased?)
    • Of course LG gets a vote. All votes are biased, in real life and here.             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR   22:28, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    • When I say idiot I mean that he doesn't learn. Not that he's stupid. Also, by that comparison, all the people who are friends with Ms don't get a vote either Also, Rex, your sig be screwing up the page.         Centriflag.jpeg   Lies are all I have. Lies and vaudeville. 
    • Just so we're clear, everyone who means the requirements gets a vote. Mscoree (talk) 23:09, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    • This probably isn't the best time to voice this opinion, but I'd just like to say I'm not a big fan of the weighted vote system. Even though I've already gotten seventeen votes, it's still almost impossible for me to win, since if just two or three TSPTF members vote no then I require a practically unfeasible amount of TSPTF votes yes. Just something to think about. Mscoree (talk) 00:30, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • I agree on the flawed voting system. It would be the equivalent of having 2/3rds of Congress approve any new congressman + the vote of the people. Daxus Inferno (talk) 01:05, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • It is kinda like modern unknown dictators like Vladimir Putin, who has made it law to run for an office u gotta have the Dumas approval. So basically Putin's party stays in power No matter what the people think FLAWED. Now everyone say what u think. MS FOR BRASS later Flag of Russian Alaska (HR).svg OCT MARIUS, HAIL HIM User talk:Octavian Marius
    • Okay slow down, but I see what you're saying. Mscoree (talk) 02:02, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • Rex, lose that thing. I have removed it from this page, and I don't want to see it ever again. Seriously, that is just insane. Ms, do not screw up the layout like that ever again. OM, read the rules next time. Lordganon (talk) 12:08, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • I have removed the signature without an actual name on it, and because Dax wrote his on there twice, I removed both of them as well. Feel free to write your names on there again, but actually make it a username and don't sign it twice again. Lordganon (talk) 12:08, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • There is nothing "weighted" about our system. It is specifically designed to head off attempts by people that have basically nothing here from spamming through a bad nomination over the objections of the staff. So, in other words, exactly this situation. Lordganon (talk) 12:20, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • Overall, I have to say that virtually none of the claims about what Ms has been doing are in fact true. All his attempts to "help" have been a nuisance, and not been even remotely helpful. Lordganon (talk) 12:20, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • I'm sorry I made the discussion section its own subsection. There was a lot of comments. Can you add those people's votes back that you removed? Also the system you just described makes it "weighted". Basically some votes are more valuable than others. Mscoree (talk) 14:11, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • I added the people LG removed back up for the time being. They can re-add themselves when they get around to it. Mscoree (talk) 17:00, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • The weighted vote system... *sigh*... is a poll of the most respected members of the wiki in addition to that of regular members. Well, when I say 'respected' I mean it loosely. We're counting Scraw in that category after all xDD The Mighty Guns is too Glorious (or lazy) to go to source mode and type out his real sig (Dammit, Guns!) 20:02, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • It's not a poll, it's a vote. Certain votes are separated. Mscoree (talk) 20:58, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • "Every thing u say about MS is Wrong", ha LG r u trying to be funny because for all I know U have never even talked to Ms on chat I get it LG you do a lot for this wiki but when the people want a leader Give them one. Everything I have said about MS is true. He is ninth on the leader board. He helps me a lot, his Doomsday and Yellowstone articles ARE awesome. He did bring many new users in, for example how many people do u see who started around the same time on here and are still on here? He is active in map games Ava R-word, plays as Italy. Also last but not least He was immature last time but now he is not. For example has he done a stupid thing like alternate History memes recently, NO! Plus when you guys deleted some of them I lost my cool thing on my page that showed my picture with HAIL MARIUS. It was really cool. Flag of Russian Alaska (HR).svg OCT MARIUS, HAIL HIM User talk:Octavian Marius
    • Motion? Motion to stop Oct from being allowed to even post on this page? Any seconds?         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  23:53, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • Let Oct rant. God knows all of us have. Mscoree (talk) 00:48, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    • I don't mind rants, as long as they make sense. Also, frankly, this is embarrassing. The behaviour of many of these editors would have resulted in bans on many other wikis and for that matter should have here.         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  00:51, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    • Oct and folks are just voicing their opinion, much like how you are. No need to get banned for that. Mscoree (talk) 00:55, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    • There's a difference between voicing your opinion and what they are doing. And you, Ms, know that I am not talking about Oct.         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  01:02, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    • I really wish this little feud between LG and Ms would stop so TSPTF could focus on more important things than their petty squabbles. Isn't there some way you both could come to some sort of compromise? And Oct, dear Christ. Stop posting.  20px Labarum.jpg CrimsonAssassin- "I have special eyes" 01:45, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    • It seems that several people (including myself) are in favor of resolving any conflict with Lordganon, which is why I have decided to seek out mediation. The two of us and several mediators will be attempting to resolve this dispute hopefully in a mature and civil fashion over the course of the next few days. I for one look forward to discussing with Lordganon, and hope that we can put this silly feud behind us. Mscoree (talk) 00:52, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
    • I am going to be rather blunt with this, as the 'new kid' I feel as though I caught the end of this whole issue that has gone down between Lordganon and Mscoree, but in all honesty I don't give a rat's ass what happened. I feel as though Mscoree would be just fine, I don't have any problems with him, and people need to put their egos aside, I joined this wiki so I could be around people who enjoy alternate history just as much as me and I've met some great members. What I don't want to see is this wiki torn apart by petty nonsense. User:LightningLynx89
    • I think the election system needs reform. Any system where some one can get 24 votes to 6 and still lose is broken. Lordganon even said the sytem was "designed to head off attempts by people that have basically nothing here from spamming through a bad nomination over the objections of the staff." So in other words the system is designed to make sure only people the staff like get in. NonEuclidean (talk) 15:09, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
    • ^ No sh*t. Anyway, you could (theoretically) get a 75% majority in the UK, and not be voted in. I think it is probably similar in the USA, if you look closely. Praetorian Flag.png RoG Flag.png "Sleeps with the fishes" "An Offer you Can't Refuse." "Make a wish. It'll be your last" Falklands Flag.png
    • NonEuc, there's a simple argument to that. One of the supporters is Oct, and the other is Warman. Together they count for -20 votes. Therefore Ms loses, actually; 4-6.
    • Yes in the United States there is a less than ideal voting system, but we shouldn't be striving for that. Mscoree (talk) 21:03, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
    • What are his critics objecting to here? A new comer that might achieve great things? He has no reason to dislike the TSPTF once he's in it.... If you can't beat them join them. The responsiblity may improve him. How about a trial period? It has no preccedent, I know, but it may satisfy all parties.He does work hard, even if some say on the wrong things. TSPF would benefit from his work ethic and he would benefit from the task. David Rain (Sometimes...) (talk) 20:30, November 29, 2013 (UTC)']
    • The trouble with Ms is that he has a horrific case of foot-in-mouth.         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  23:16, November 29, 2013 (UTC)
    • Not happening, DR. Removed the two I removed earlier again. Doesn't change the overall results, and they are more than welcome to sign the thing with their user names once per user when they see this. Lordganon (talk) 17:11, November 30, 2013 (UTC)
    • I put their names back per request. I'll inform them that they have to revote a third time. Mscoree (talk) 21:55, November 30, 2013 (UTC)
    • I think that, not being in the TSPTF (correct me if I botched it) from a user perspective, MS has done a lot of good on Alt Hist Wiki with Map games (NotLAH: btw: I still want a sequel), and timelines (Yellowstone). I believe he has a lot to offer and has matured quite a bit since I have been a member. I agree we need a new voting system because I feel it is unfair to us, the non-TSPTF members. It's like a US president getting the popular vote and the electoral votes, but Congress puts some other guy in because they don't like the candidate. Daeseunglim (talk) 22:15, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks to everyone who voted. I accept this nomination. I want to be constable because I don't want to be an idiot anymore. I don't want to play mean anymore. I don't want to be neutral anymore, or positive, or negative. Power is like a drug and I want to get high off its fumes. I want to be sedated by it. I want to die a man of great happiness. I want to thank the forty or so people who decided to edit this section. I want to thank the academy. I want to thank orange and green. I want to thank big brother. I want to thank the system. I want to acknowledge the Illuminati. I want to tdrink the kool-aid, and take the red pill, and jump off the deep end into the warm comforting arms of the wiki. I want to thank the veterans. I want to thank the saints and sinners, and the people who spell St. Valentine's Day with no "S". I want to thank pigs on the wing, dogs, pigs, and sheep. I want to play the game. I want to pass go. I want to collect two hundred dollars. I want to be glad, and I want to be sad. Most of all I'm glad I even had the chance to meet so many great people. You have made me laugh, you have made my cried. I like the bold and italics emphasizing, the copyediting, the racism, the smiles, the warm stone tiles. I want to thank the people, the oligarchy, the hierarchy, ladders, cake batters and mad hatters, fish out of water, and editors in a see of 1983. I like the jazz to it all, the rush and hustling of wiki life, man. I like being called mentally disabled, telling fables, learning much, and leaving my touch. So there you go, save a spot for me on your wall. God save the queen. Fix your Latin declining or so help me. Sleep tight. Freedom. Mscoree (talk) 00:42, December 5, 2013 (UTC)


Cour is one of the most respected map gamers on this wiki, and indeed is one of the steadying influencing on the wild implausogasms of some of our more recent members *wink*. He's also had bountiful experience dealing with trolls and idiots, as he has moderated several map games where these species are more common. Come to think of it, he's had bountiful experience in general, having spent nigh on two years on the wiki.  Who else signs off like this? (And yes, clicking on the link is cheating -_-) 20:27, November 20, 2013‎

(Talk to Me)

  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • You forgot the 'ers'. Fool. xDDD
    • ​Do I have to accept the nomination, or is it only after I'm elected? CourageousLife (talk) 02:40, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • You have to accept it and give a reason why prior. Lordganon (talk) 12:20, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • Okay. I accept this nomination, and will work towards the betterment of the wiki and any articles or map games in which I am present. CourageousLife (talk) 00:07, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    • I can't tell. He's clearly winning in users, but in TSPTF members he only has a majority, not a supermajority.         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  00:09, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
      • For the sake of bettering myself, could I get feedback as to why you voted yes or no? This would help me out a lot. CourageousLife (talk) 03:32, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    • This will be hilarious. Cour, you'll have a majority in both ordinary memebrs and TSTPF memebrs, but will still fail to pass. Unless I can get Viva here...         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  19:06, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
    • And I stand corrected; thank you, Viva.         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  22:36, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
    • Simply put, you've never shown by what I've seen to have tried to help. Never hindered, just not really helped like the requirements request. Don;t seem experienced enough, either. Lordganon (talk) 17:11, November 30, 2013 (UTC)
    • Ahem. It's been two weeks. New Constable much?         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  01:10, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
    • Oh, for the love of- IT HAS BEEN TWO WEEKS. COUR WON THE VOTE. GRAD THIS. Simple and plain English? I can do Spanish, French, or Latin, too, and that's without going to a translator.
    • Thanks a lot to all who voted for me, and I hope I can live up to everyone's expectations. Can't wait to start! CourageousLife (talk) 23:38, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

The old baby 2

Well, I would like to nominate TOB - a great contributor who works hard and gets along with everyone. Flag of Russian Alaska (HR).svg OCT MARIUS, HAIL HIM User talk:Octavian Marius 02:07, November 21, 2013 (UTC)


I would like to nominate Hailstormer for the position of Constable. He seems to be a very well rounded and level headed person, hes on chat alot (which means he can handle some of these pesky situations without it going to an admin) and he seems to be very well versed in population statistics among other topics as well. Also considering its rather calm attitude and ability to handle situations rather well (so ive seen) i feel like he would be a good addition to the ranks of Constable The Unchallenged Conqueror #FP (Talk to Me) 01:47, January 26, 2014 (UTC)

  • Discussion
  • I've seen Hail try and resolve arguments peacefully in several places, including on chat, and try to mediate massive disscussions and arguments. He expressed his frustration to me during the Ms Sockpuppet thing about not being able to calm down the chat because of his lack of mod powers.         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  01:49, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • And again, we need him to accept first. 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 01:53, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • Agreeing with the above points. Hail is a very level-headed person and manages the be nice as well as collected and smart. Cookiedamage (talk) 01:56, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • I would like to thank Feud for this nomination, as well as Guns and Cookie for their kind words. I happily accept this nomination. As Guns said, I have expressed my frustration to a number of people as my attempts to calm down chat and regulate it are limited by my lack of mod powers. I have chat running on my computer pretty much all day on most days, and I believe that I can be of real use as a constable as a result. Hailstormer (talk) 01:59, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • Ooh... don't mention chat!!         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  02:57, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • We need more TSPTF people seeing as so many of them are active, and Hail seems like he's level-headed enough to be one of them. Fed (talk) 04:21, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • I guess now would be a good time as any. :P 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 23:36, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
  • Like it or not, map games are a major part of the modern wiki, and Hail excels in playing and being a great mediator in them. He's getting my vote.


Feudalplague is probably the most impactful new player of 2013. In fact, he is. He won the Stirling for that, but that is besides the point of his nomination (or is it?). Anyways, Feud, as he is popularly called, is an effective user and notable, while mostly for map games, also for his contributions and regular advice given freely to help others' timelines. He also has his own, developing, timeline,The Unexpected Kingdom. He is also a "Security Council" member of YS, and one of the better contributors. Unlike some newer users, Feud is decently predictable, cool-headed, and always able to solve and resolve issues between other players. He is on chat almost daily (more than I am, at least, and that says a lot, I think!), and also is frequently able to overcome his own personal biases (which are minimal, as far as I am aware). Feud also used to operate a nicely successful map game, South American Rising (Map Game), which was probably a bit smaller than NotLAH, but around the level of ROTS.

Feudalplague has my vote, being one of the most deserving people in contention for what seems to be an enlargement of the TSPTF (we seriously need to put some "active" members into Emeritus), and I hope, for the wiki's sake, that he has your's. Reximus | Talk to Me! 04:21, February 15, 2014 (UTC)

  • Objectors
    • Flag of Russian Alaska (HR).svg OCT MARIUS, HAIL HIM User talk:Octavian Marius whenever he has power uses it to Harass me in anyway possible, and is heavily biased.
    • Has a major problem with his mouth. Haven't seen any hint of him doing anti-vandal work, ether. Lordganon (talk) 15:51, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
    • He's a nice guy but he can be very aggressive sometimes, and as others have noted, as a bit of a mouth. I see him on chat a lot and he's usually intoxicated or hungover. NonEuclidean ツ (Talk)
    • No just no. -Nova 22:41, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
    • NFSreloaded (talk) 22:55, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
    • Simply no. Not even "not yet". FirstStooge (talk) 09:12, February 20, 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    • I will accept this nomination i hope to see this wikia improve for the better with my advancement to Constable and will happily take on the duties of Constable. Honestly i wasnt exactly expecting it but i am on chat alot, and i have been asked on multiple occasions to consult on timeline, i have caught vandals on various occasions (particularly the guy on the PMIII page that just made me laugh). Along with that i believe im relatively liked around the wikia and considering the guy i most recently had an issue with is nominating me i think that is a testament in my skills with handling bad situations. Regardless of this i will accept this nomination and its responsibilities happily and will carry out the duties to the best of my Abilities. Thank you for the Nomination Rex.
    • I saw that comment Crim.... i really do and i will.. :P lol The Wings of Freedom #FP Wings of freedom 2.png (Talk to Me)
    • Yeah.         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  19:11, February 15, 2014 (UTC)
    • Cool headed, no. Helpful, yes.         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  22:35, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
    • For all information im never around usually for vandal work (im busier than most of the people around here due to college and whatnot) but i did catch a few most particularly that recent one with PMIII relabeling everything The Wings of Freedom #FP Wings of freedom 2.png (Talk to Me)
    • He is good at resolving disputes... but I mean he also creates some...         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  23:57, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
    • No personal offence, Guns, but you too cause arguments. I cause arguments. Ms causes arguments. Even LG, who is our head honcho, causes arguments. Everyone causes some arguments if they are here long enough. Reximus | Talk to Me! 09:03, February 20, 2014 (UTC)
    • I don't cause arguments... arguments cause me.         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  22:13, February 21, 2014 (UTC)


Bfox has been an active member of this wiki. He's been on for a little under two years, and in that time, he's been helpful, polite, and very productive. He's done massive amounts of work on timelines and map games alike, and is generally acknowledged as a stabilizing influence on the wiki. I have seen him calm chat disputes many a time, and he is one of the users I respect the most on this wiki. Besides, we need at least on TSPTF member with proper musical taste! :P ~Guns, who has a secret plot to take over the TSPTF by nomming everyone he likes into power. (March 31)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • Ai'ighty then, this was unexpected, and I'll get right into this. I'd like to state that I heartily accept this nomination, and if I am to become a Constable of the TSPF, I will do everything that I am capable of to do things such as revert the edits annoying trolls that have become quite a nuisance on major map games such as PMIII, and try to be a welcoming, yet stern presence on the chat, which often descends into madness. Another area I would like to take into consideration is the realm of map game moderator nominations, which often become "I scratch your back, you scratch mine" affairs, and I will use my authority to help hopefully end that. In short, I will not be a Constable who sits on my power and uses it for prestige alone. Thank you Guns and all who vote! Macedon Shield.pngBow To Your Sensei. BOW TO YOUR SENSEI!!!
    • Too much nomination make me dizzy. FirstStooge (talk) 02:30, April 1, 2014 (UTC)
    • Swanky has been removed - he is not eligible to vote. Lordganon (talk) 11:44, April 1, 2014 (UTC)
    • Bfox is very capable as a user - he helps us out whenever we need to and remains committed to the wiki, something always useful in a constable. :) 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 11:59, April 1, 2014 (UTC)
    • Wow, I was surprised at this outcome. Unanimous vote for me at the time. Thank you! Macedon Shield.pngBow To Your Sensei. BOW TO YOUR SENSEI!!!Rome Shield.png
    • TWO WEEKS HATH ELAPSED! (This phrase is becoming a nomination staple)Macedon Shield.pngBow To Your Sensei. BOW TO YOUR SENSEI!!!Rome Shield.png

G greg e

Greg is a great contributor and a very fair individual. I first met him when we both played NotLAH and I remember him as one of the best players, always having a calm tone and a great way of explaining things. He continues to edit rather frequently and is a great addition to the wiki. I hereby nominate him for the position of constable because I believe he will apply his good skills toward this job to make the wiki a better place. Tr0llis (talk) 21:08, April 29, 2014 (UTC)

  • Discussion
    • ​I'll abstain here, though instinct suggests against it. BTW, on an unrelated note, Scraw, Pita, and MP should be El Tees by now, and Impo brass.
    • I thank tr0llis for the nomination and am honored to be considered for such a role on this wiki. I would be honored to take on such a position; however, the timing is just not right at this moment for me. I am committed to this wiki and will continue to be an active member (with a few vacations here and there) and hope that I can continue to contribute to this wiki in many facites. Hopefully I can be reconsidered for this in the future when I have more hours to dedicate to the wiki and would be able to do the responsibilties of that a constible to the greatest of my abilities. Thank you once again though. g greg e (talk) 17:56, April 30, 2014 (UTC)
    • ^ Is that a declination? Is declination the right word for it? I don't think it is, but...
    • Yes it is, I respectfully decline as I cannot peform the responsibilties to the best of my ability at this time. g greg e (talk) 01:03, May 1, 2014 (UTC) 


Honestly, I had a quarrel with Rex over a sensitive issue last year. However, recently Rex shows us that he already growing up and became more open-minded person. He categorizing and fighting against vandalism and spamming very extensively. That will making him a good addition to the TSPTF. He proved himself not only a good writer, but also the one of most dedicated contributors on this wiki. FirstStooge (talk) 11:24, May 16, 2014 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • Agree completely. In fact, I was going to do this eventually. Bfoxius (talk)
    • Reximus helped me on many things, I agree 110% that he should be nominated. Saturn120 (Talk)
    • Just FS nominating him says that he is ready. Flag of Russian Alaska (HR).svg OCT MARIUS, HAIL HIM User talk:Octavian Marius
    • Rex has had a past, and I disagree with him on almost all off-wiki matters. God forbid he ever become President of the USA.  But seeing as on-wiki, I don't think he can stop the socialist revolution- and seeing that FS has clearly forgiven him- I'm in favor.         Centriflag.jpeg   Tonight the foxes will hunt the hounds!  22:53, May 16, 2014 (UTC)
    • Wow, I just noticed this after being on mobile for about a week. First, I'd like to say that I am thoroughly honored by the nomination. Coming from First, I think, shows his character, as he has an open heart. However, after much consideration, I feel that I must decline this nomination. As I said, I am blown away by this suggestion. The reason for declining the offer is simple: I will be pretty busy this summer. I will try to keep aiding the wiki in my previous ways, but the TSPTF badge, star and title (while nice) do not mean the world to me. I would like to continue contributing. I've been here for just a year and have been banned twice, both for relatively offensive reasons. While I am not denying that I have (hopefully) gotten better, I am saying that a few more months of maturity would not be harmful for my own development or for the future of this wiki. Thank You, Reximus | Talk to Me! 20:53, May 21, 2014 (UTC)
    • Pity. You'd have done well. But no offense, I don't think the vote would have gone through anyway. There are a few of us who are on a blacklist. We cannot and, perhaps, should not come to power.         Centriflag.jpeg   Tonight the foxes will hunt the hounds!  22:26, May 21, 2014 (UTC)
    • Rex is good guy, and an active player. But the implausiblities and controversial jokes are why I say no. If Rex decides to clean up his act, and he is nominated later, then sure. SwankyJ (talk) 02:31, May 22, 2014 (UTC)
      • I've already declined the nomination, ergo the vote is closed. Reximus | Talk to Me! 05:55, May 22, 2014 (UTC)


Since Andrew joined, shortly before I did, he's spent ample time contributing to various projects on the wiki such as the great Principia Moderni Map Game series, which he is now a moderator of. Outside of that, he's contributed to a few TLs, and done quite a bit of anti-vandal/troll work on map games, timelines, and in the chat. I hereby nominate Andr3w777 for TSPTF Constable. Bfoxius (talk)  (May 21)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • I thank bfox and everyone for this nomination. I am honoured by such. I have worked to be a very appoachable individual and have a genuine respect for history. I have long attempted to be a mediator on wiki conflicts and have strived to be a voice of reason. I am pleased that someone would nominate me. I am ever greatful and accept this nomination. I hope others feel the same, I know I may have been a little crass toward others in the past, but I have attempted (to great success) to be a better player and care about the events on the wiki. Thanks again Bfox and others.Tardis.pngALLONS-Y!!,Basically, RUN!!Tardis.png 02:24, May 22, 2014 (UTC)
    • Andrew is one of the most level-headed, fair and consistent people I know on the wiki. I can think of no one better suited to-nor who I believe would work harder to fulfil the duties of- the role. Callumthered (talk) 05:14, May 29, 2014 (UTC)

Sine dei gloriem

Sine joined shortly after I did, playing the same map game I started out on. Since then, he has become a MAJOR player of map games, from all of the esteemed PM series games, to NoTLAH, to Roma Delenda Est. He has also contributed to several community timelines, and has been overall a great individual who is more than capable of TSPTF Constablehood. Sine currently has a spot on the PMIII mod list, and has done a great job making maps and hunting out ASBdom on PMIII. I hereby nominate Sine dei gloriem for TSPTF Constable. Bfoxius (talk) 21:53, June 5, 2014 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • ​Nice job, Bfox. ~~Guns, whose secret plot- to take over the TSPTF by getting people he likes nommed- is succeeding.
    • I'm in no man's side on the opinion of users about TSPTF. I'm neutral here. and i accept this nomm, thank you Bfox Sine dei gloriem "Ex Initio Terrae" (talk) 22:10, June 5, 2014 (UTC)
    • The most important and defenatelly not irrelevant Toby stamp of approval has been given :Pe WHY seriously why???!!! 21:46, June 6, 2014 (UTC)
    • 'Hello. When I first joined, I didn't know much about this wiki, and I met Sine on chat - we chatted for the whole morning and overall I felt that he was a very pleasant guy. Later on, when I wanted to start my map game, Colonial World, he helped me with it and gave me some tips. During the map game, he helped with combating the ASBness as there were several new players playing my map game and he corrected them about the things they had done wrong.' His maps are also great, and with 4000+ edits he is well qualified to be a member of the TSPTF. Not to mention he is already an admin on the Map Game wiki, so he has some experience. Template:Rcchang
    • Right, I forgot to say that. He's Head Mod of MGW. Though, that's not really a point in his favour...
    • On a sidenote i'm turning two years since i entered the wiki in a week (June 13th of 2012) Yay! Sine dei gloriem "Ex Initio Terrae" (talk) 02:59, June 7, 2014 (UTC)
    • Two weeks, Reximus | Talk to Me! 19:36, June 19, 2014 (UTC)



Toby has been an active member of the wiki, has also reached a substantial number of edits and has begun working on his own timeline. In these six months he has improved as an editor and a member of the community in general which is why I humbly suggest that you, my fellow wikians, consider accepting him as a member of the TSPTF. Sincerely, FirstChairmanLogo(Sky).pngSkyGreen24 - Join the partyFirstChairmanLogo(Sky).png 20:25, July 14, 2014 (UTC)

  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • I accept nomination Toby2: THEY CALL ME Mr. Awesome!!!
    • You need to explain why you want the position, Toby. Lordganon (talk) 02:09, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
    • When he provides a real acceptance speech, I shall most likely vote "yea." Reximus | Talk to Me! 07:44, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
    • Ok. I wish to have this position because I wish to help the wiki improve. The wiki is always evolving. I want to take part in steering the wiki in the right direction, and help fix vandalism. I've been trying to report vandals and solve chat disputes when I can, and with this I think I can do more to benefit the wikiToby2: THEY CALL ME Mr. Awesome!!!
    • Are these over? Toby2: THEY CALL ME Mr. Awesome!!!


Since his last nomination, I think Feud has really grown. He's taken a leadership role in the popular map game, Principia Moderni III, being the guy many people go to with questions about the game and algorithms. It seems like he is one of the few people who knows when people deserve punishment and when people deserve lenience, leading me to believe that he would make an excellent chat moderator and a lovely addition to the TSPTF. To add to this, I've never seen him power-whoring (asking people if they think he'd make a good admin/constable). Through our many interactions, I have come to recognize Feud as a friend, be it through mod duty on PMIII to late night bromances (which LG can attest to) to simply joking around with other users on chat. All-in-all, if there's one person not in the TSPTF who needs to be in the TSPTF, it's this guy. I asked him on chat and he'd be interested and he said yes, so here we go. CrimsonAssassin-See you, space cowboys 00:37, July 17, 2014 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
    • The Hurian Database Wiki Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 00:26, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
    • Lordganon (talk) 10:23, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
    • While I had originally thought that a yes vote would be the best course of action, and I even nominated him a few months back, I have since reoconsidered. Feud is undoubtedly a great contributor, but the more I think about it, the less I see of him actually needing the title. Yes, he is a consistent member of the chat group, but we can see him being central a number of arguments. Furthermore (and time has passed, but its possibly b/c of summer) must I remind everyone of the times Feud came to chat drunk? He also has a poor mouth, which I feel is unfitting for a mod. Reximus | Talk to Me! 10:31, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
    • I feel like it isn't a good idea for Feud to become a constable anytime soon, recently his chat escapade when the new users came on made me reconsider his ability to stay calm under stress. Sorry. FirstChairmanLogo(Sky).pngSkyGreen24 - Join the partyFirstChairmanLogo(Sky).png 11:07, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
    • Kurt Cobain's Haircut (talk) 23:55, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
    • I still love you Feud but I think you're a bit arrogant and stubborn. RexImperio (talk) 08:40, July 25, 2014 (UTC)
    • Toby2: THEY CALL ME Mr. Awesome!!!
    • NFSreloaded (talk) 15:04, July 26, 2014 (UTC)
    • Saturn (Talk/Blog) 16:06, July 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    • I accept this nomination and all the responsibility stemming from it. I have spent a large amount of time on this wiki and in conjunction with people like Cookie, Rex, Sine, Fed, weve all come across and handled vandals as per the rules. I am whole heartedly for fighting against the vandalism of the wiki especially to prevent more of that ridiculousness we had with a few certain users (who shall remained unamed) Im also extremely interested in keeping with a consistent chat policy (not trying to call anyone out here) but while it has improved extremely, we still get socks, and really all around intolerable people that i feel like could be handled alot more promptly and consistently so as to prevent more of these spamming and harassment issues from cropping up. Along with all these, ive been an active contributor for a good while, and have been doing work along with Crim and a few others for a new Timeline as well as my own personal one. As much as is said here i believe i would do great in the Constable position, but i understand its something you earn and are not entitled too as a member of the wikia, and are expected to be one of the more mature, and helpful members of the Wiki.   Feudalplague (talk) 01:18, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
    • You need to explain why you want the position, FP. Lordganon (talk) 02:09, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
    • Ah sorry i was going to get to that ill add to my previous post about it if thats alright with you. Feudalplague (talk) 02:24, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
    • Does the nominator get to vote? Reximus | Talk to Me! 07:44, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
    • I don't believe he's ready yet. Besides, we have enough constables as it is. The Hurian Database Wiki Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 00:26, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
    • Hey box people. Yeah, you. Get your boxes in a template. Gorram boxes. ~ Scraw 01:03, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
    • Can't nominate and then support it, Crim. Lordganon (talk) 10:23, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
    • I have an idea if Feud is not accepted again. We wait until 3 months until his school calendar and then re-evaluate. I really think his time spent on chat drunk is unacceptable, and while he has improved lately he also hasn't had much internet lately. If you are not on chat, you cannot be in trouble on chat. Additionally, he is central to many arguments which is also something a TSPTF member should not be. Reximus | Talk to Me! 16:26, July 21, 2014 (UTC) Addendum: I re-read the nomination and would like to make sure everyone knows that I consider Feud to be mi amigo also. However, the aforementioned concerns prevent me from being pushed over the top in favor of him.
    • Where is this comming from? i havent been drunk,drinking, etc on chat in the past 6 months at all. pretty much since my last nom and the recent arguements were centered on a game not me. As for the new user, he called me derogatory names for like 15 minutes straight. The Wings of Freedom #FP Wings of freedom 2.png (Talk to Me)
    • He didn't call you derogatory names he said you don't have "swag" or something. You seriously over-reacted and when Ms came and said to stop you said 'We used to do this to Oct like 20 times a day just for speaking like this'. Has it stopped? Probably, although I have rarely seen Oct on chat anyways but that might just be me. You said it yourself during an argument with Viva on chat. You're an a**hole but "atleast" you admit. So does that mean we should overlook that? I don't think so. You tried to help me re-evaluate my vote, but that won't happen. Feud, this might be one of the rare occassions I am perfectly honest with you. I dislike you. Your cockyness, your rudeness, your self-centered behaviour. Heh, this reminds me of the time when you told us you had sex with a "high-end" stripper. Sure, let everyone on chat now, but don't speak of it again you just wanted to remind us of how awesome you are. Also reminds me of another time when you switched to that Pandapoleon avatar. You said it fits you perfectly. I think it was powerful(?) and loveable. A bit delusional I'd like to say. People talk behind your back on chat often. Eip said "Even if you agree with him, only he (Feud) can be right." To end my argument. I just don't think a person like you should be granted any power on this wiki for now. Especially not on chat since you seem to have a short fuse. FirstChairmanLogo(Sky).pngSkyGreen24 - Join the partyFirstChairmanLogo(Sky).png 17:30, July 21, 2014 (UTC) 
    • That entire story is taken out of context for the most part. People asked if i had a crazy/good night. i explained the story, and said its something i wouldnt do again period. Sorry for having a crazy night out with my friends that for the most part i regret in general. For the most part you should be leaving personal stories of my college life out of this Discussion as they are not pertinent to any of your arguements and to me honestly looks like a cheap shot to make me look like an awful human being. I have a personal life, and using my RL mistakes as an excuse for a cheap shot on here is really not okay. Brutally honest or not im saying thats a tad uncalled for The Wings of Freedom #FP Wings of freedom 2.png (Talk to Me)
    • Though I have a major respect for Feud, i havent seen him work on any Timelines since i joined the wiki. i think personally we need more people in the TSPTF who have worked on TLs. though i think he should, but to be safe, im saying no. Saturn (Talk/Blog) 16:09, July 26, 2014 (UTC)


Guns is one of the more senior members of the wiki. He's a well known character in chat, as well as helping out on many other timelines and map games such as 1983DD, PMIII (Briefly as China), and has other timelines too. Also, considering the fact of the recent shitstorms lately, I highly recommend we get a chat person to take care of this before it can get more out of hand. Saturn (Talk/Blog) 02:33, October 14, 2014 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
    • I really like and admire Guns as a user, but in my opinion I can't picture him being a chat mod. He can be a bit foolish at times, but more importantly, he seems to be quite inactive on chat recently. At the moment I am voting no, but I hope that Guns says a positive contribution on the wiki and only serves to prove me wrong (maybe even change my mind). Fritzmet (talk) 19:07, October 14, 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    • ​Thank you, Saturn. While I have previously made it a policy not to accept any TSPTF nominations, the recent juvenile and offensive actions by multiple members of this community have changed my mind about that, cause they've succeeded in making ME look mature. I want to be a constable because I think we're at the point where these- let's not bandy words- shitstorms are getting far to frequent, and it's time to put the hammer down. This is meant to be a peaceful and productive wiki, not one for arguing over everything and bullying other users. Let's return it to that. Thank you. (I've surpassed the 6 months of experience necessary, right?)         Centriflag.jpeg   Tonight the foxes will hunt the hounds!  02:42, October 14, 2014 (UTC)
    • Ok, so first of all Guns, sorry. I find that you are one of the funnier and nicer people on this wiki, but I don't think you are fit for a constable. You seem far too immature and you really aren't frequent on chat. Plus, you have recently said that your ablity to contribute would be decreasing. I abstain. I am on the edge... The EdgeofNight ╚╩o.o╩╝
    • Guns has tried to be a mediator in discussions lately, is more or less a respected user, oh and a mscovite voted against him, that means he is TSPTF material. SkyGreen24(Party,quotes) 17:02, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
      • Stealing my jokes now, are we Sky? Reximus | Talk to Me! 18:31, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
      • That's strange, since some :"Ms cronies" also voted no against Rex. Tr0llis (talk) 20:31, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
  • The voting should be over now, it's been two weeks. So, it looks like Guns is a mod, Now, the squirrels, lol. Saturn (Talk/Blog) 00:09, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
  • They'll get to it. Calm down, sat. And thanks!         Centriflag.jpeg   Tonight the foxes will hunt the hounds!  00:16, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
  • Uhh, that said, it has been 2 days since said election expired. LG! IMPO! WHERE ARE YOU?         Centriflag.jpeg   Tonight the foxes will hunt the hounds!  22:10, October 29, 2014 (UTC)


Reximus has been here since mid-2013 and already has more edits (approximately 18,775 as of 1/17/2015) than the vast majority of all of us. I recognize that edits are not everything, and he has been a copyediting machine in recent months, even netting an unprecidented Stirling nomination for copyedits. Beyond that, he has participated in many personal timelines, community timelines, map games, and various other projects over the course of his career. Though he was rather immature early on in his wiki career, he eventually got over that and has become rather well-liked throughout the wiki. I nominate Reximus55 for the position of TSPTF Constable. ~Bfo

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • Rex does have a lot of experience and he is in fact one of the most active users, contributing heavily to the wiki in form of TLs, map games and copyedits. I do believe, despite his shady past and any issues he might have at the moment, he would still be a valuable asset to the TSPTF. However, I'm not sure if I'm going to vote for him yet, especially since my vote would as of 20 January count as TSPTF from what I see. SkyGreen24(P,Q) 11:13, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • Rex, you also need to accept the nomination.             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR   14:59, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • Alright, to spare you all from reading this TL;DR response, I will let you all know in advance: I respectfully decline the nomination for Constable. It really is an honor to be nominated, and I truly appreciate it, but I feel that now is not the time. As many have pointed out, I am active in the community, and that won't be going away. In fact, if anything I intend to step up my game, having been pretty inactive in November/December/January, at least by my standards. As has also been pointed out, I already do what, in my eyes, is a good deal of service to this community, be it through spell-checking, helping Nuke with image duplication, or categorization reform. I am passionate about this wiki, and I hope my effort shows this. With that being said, I will not stop this just because I am not going to be in the TSPTF. I understand that I have had a.... rough past, with a few users in particular coming to mind, but I have been working on it and I see that I have improved from a "No way." to a "Still not convinced." Its been a great time here, and as I've said, I am not going anywhere. The other main reason I have declined is due to what I perceive to be an overfilling of the TSPTF with just users who are cool, but perhaps don't add much to the overall value of the wiki a few months after getting the nod. I don't want to be one of those guys, and if/when I am elected, I will work to reverse that trend. Thank you, Bfox. I appreciate it very much, but I must decline. Reximus | Talk to Me! 17:29, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • Done, Rex. Folks, this is why you ask first. Lordganon (talk) 11:29, January 19, 2015 (UTC)


He's a very nice and kind person, in general, and knows what's right and what's wrong. He's an extremely levelheaded person, and can help sort out arguments. He always follows through, from what I've seen, and is always drawn to push forward with his projects. I believe that he would be a good choice to be a Constable, because he'll be a fair manager of the chat and the wiki in general. Vinland Flag.jpg Upvoteanthology (Talk | Sandbox), 04:09, January 6, 2015 (UTC)

  • Discussion
    • Sky, make sure you write why you want to be a constable. Vinland Flag.jpg Upvoteanthology (Talk | Sandbox)
    • First of all, I'd like to thank Upvote for the nomination. As to why I would want to be a constable, I guess I did contribute a lot to the wiki in the year and a some months I've been here, I believe I have shown some anti-vandalism work. I might not be as timeline-active compared to other users, but I do think that I am able to settle arguments, hear out both sides of an argument and, a trait some users lack, admit when I'm wrong. Also, although the rollback ability does not make much of a difference, I think I could make the best of it. Cheers, SkyGreen24(P,Q) 10:55, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
    • Can't vote for a nomination you make. Lordganon (talk) 12:09, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
    • I want Sky to get user rights as well. He deserves them. It would be nice to have someone around more often to make sure me and Scar/Ace etc, don't get in a flame war. Spartian300 (talk) 12:16, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
      • Actually, you can prevent that youselves lol. Saturn120 (Talk/Blog) 13:15, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
      • But you aren't there most o the time. spar
    • One of the main reasons I voted for Sky is because he is on chat a lot and thus can be very useful as a constable and would make for even more mod presence in chat. He could effectively prevent shitstorms early Prinsenvlag.svg Hail Sean! (Tech can into talkpage?)
      15:51, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
    • I think he'll be a fine constable, as long as you don't suggest that Serbs are better than Croats. But other than that, he's fine. "This is not your grave but you are welcome in it." 18:10, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
    • I promise I won't, haha. SkyGreen24(P,Q) 20:11, January 6, 2015 (UTC)


Ms is one of the wiki's most active users and best writers. He is always willing to help and contribute, and has now become an active part in many timelines. Although he got off to a rocky start when he first joined, he has since become much more mature and cooperative. He seems to get along nicely with everyone, and has spent a lot of time working to fight vandalism, spam, and other matters. For that reason I think he should be constable. Not to mention he really should be by now; he lost 5 - 33 in his last vote, and all he needed was 5 - 34 (not to mention Fed said he was going to vote yes, but arrived about an hour late). QuebecanCanada (talk) 00:20, January 18, 2015 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
    • No way in hell. Hasn't changed a bit. Lordganon (talk) 10:24, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 14:33, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • NFSreloaded (talk) 15:28, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • Nope. Still does the same old Antic The Wings of Freedom #FP Wings of freedom 2.png (Talk to Me)
    • After thinking for a bit, I am still going to say no for Ms' nomination Saturn120 (Talk/Blog) 18:53, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • Definitely not. Fed (talk) 20:37, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • I could write a novel on the reasons Ms doesn't deserve this position. Crim de la Crème 00:38, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • Not too sure I should comment. -- NuclearVacuum Russian America 03:36, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • Nay. FirstStooge (talk) 08:26, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • Mitro (talk) 17:09, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • Sorry Ms. After giving it some serious thought, what has happened seems to keep happening. I think you're a valuable contributor, but I fear giving you any power. Cour *talk* 22:47, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • Yesterday I thought yes. But what I saw today is enough to reverse my decision. Regards, Laptop Zombie 05:44, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • I am changing my vote to nay because I am afraid of voting yes. Hopefully this ends it. Don't want to risk a ban right now, sorry Ms. Fritzmet (talk) 19:06, January 19, 2015 (UTC)
    • Emperor Eric XV of Sweden - Sugar Rush Art.png Eric von Schweetz T C IM] boarder
    • Tough decision, but looking at how you've been recently I have to vote no sadly. :( Blocky858
  • Discussion
    • @all admins ​Don't revet the descriptioon tr0llis made, i couldn't write all of it so i asked him 
    • If there is a single Wikian who deserves to be constable (arguably even Lt, in my opinion), it is Ms. Now, I know I have been harsh on him a lot of the time. But lately, I have seen just the transformation he has undergone. I have realized just how kind and helpful a person he can be. I have been so rude to Ms so often, but the next day, he jumps right back in and offers to help me. And then there are his contributions. He has almost 40k edits, and these are not just boring small additions. He has been extremely active in the community, with active roles in 83:DD, 36:YS, KF, and had been a good mod for PM3. Then, there is NotLAH, which was one of the greatest map games of all time. His Stirling record is surpassed by very few individuals, and his character is out of this world. I understand that many people may be tempted to object, but I urge you to get to know him before you do so. Can he be dramatic? Sure, but he is overall less dramatic than a number of other users. We all have our ups and downs. To become a constable, you need more ups than downs, and Ms has fulfilled this role. I hope, for the sake of this wiki, that Ms gets Constable. Signed, The Leading Anti-Mscovite, Reximus | Talk to Me! 01:06, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • Ms, you still need to accept the nomination.             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR   14:58, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • As I've said before, Mscoree is one of the only users on this wiki who was helpful and welcoming when I first joined the wiki. He councils me on my timeline, and he appears to be active on many others. I can't think of anyone else who would be more deserving of some sort of admin position, based on his level of activity, edit count, and number of projects. I don't know what sort of disagreement he has with some of these users, but what ever it is I hope they can bury the hatchet and move on, for the sake of this wiki. Ratcolor (talk) 18:50, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • Unsurprisingly, Ms and his friends have sucessfully trolled chat into oblivion and got a 2 hour block until they can calm down. Crim de la Crème 01:51, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • Doesnt that make him ineligible? The Wings of Freedom #FP Wings of freedom 2.png (Talk to Me)
    • "Bye. Enjoy your nomination" - Crim Harvenard2 (talk) 02:39, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • The requirements state 'blocked', not chat banned, which means he's still eligible. I think... SkyGreen24(P,Q) 16:46, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • I've removed my vote. One of the main reasons I voted yes was because it seems Ms has changed and become less disruptive and troll-ish. And then last night, tr0llis and all of them caused a huge disruption in chat and gotten themselves banned. I also remember when Ms essentially attempted to cheat in the Spanish-Austrian war in PM3, so that also propelled me to remove my vote. Anyways, I think Ms is a good community member and I'm grateful for the things he's done, but clearly he continues to allow his friends to cause crap on chat and tick everyone off. Cookiedamage (talk) 20:42, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • Congratulations Crim, your set up is succeeding. I guess it's coincidental that this event happened during Mscoree's election, with the only witnesses being the people opposed to him in said election. Read the complete chat log, as you can see Mscoree essentially did not do anything. When he spoke it was mostly to tell people to calm down. Meanwhile Feud uttered several personal attacks and curses at Mscoree, Tr0llis, etc, and all Fed (the admin) did was "^". Then you wonder why Tr0llis said some things back. Strangely Mscoree is the one who is punished, along with all of them. Let's review how that happened. Crim joined chat and after only a few seconds, without even hearing what had happened, banned Ms, Tr0llis, Harv, etc. Monster Pumpkin, an admin even said it seemed like Mscoree did nothing wrong. In the chat logs themselves Tr0llis is called mature, and Mscoree is said to be the one lessening tensions, not escalating. Later I joined chat, having read the chat logs, and when I asked about it I too was immediately banned. Crim then proceeded to plaster a heavily exaggerated story on here for the sole purpose of embarrassing Ms and destroying his election. Heavily bias and inappropriate, in my opinion it undermines the entire office of admin. The sad thing is it works, and no one can stop you. Fritzmet (talk) 00:41, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • ^That type of aggressive, ganging behaviour is what made me vote against Ms, fyi. Fed (talk) 03:02, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • So one person talking is ganging? Not to mention I am seemingly in opposition by multiple people. Also how does my actions affect Mscoree? Do you usually vote on people depending on what people around him or her do to you? Fritzmet (talk) 03:38, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • Why is no one taking heed of this? I was banned for "cursing" even though the log shows I never cursed at all. Feud cursed an excess of a dozen times, for comparison. Not that Crim would know, since he banned me without even listening to what I had to say after about five seconds on chat. Note I wasn't there for the last part of this event, I left chat and joined back some thirty minutes later, said hello, and was banned. As for banning Ms it seems like Crim claims that three/four people other than Feud immediately asked him to, but he seems to keep switching his story, and no one knows who these people are. Strange, because at least six people were asking for Feud to be banned. Tr0llis (talk) 13:46, January 25, 2015 (UTC)
    • I'm not going to comment on the argument, since I missed most of it, but I must say the following: Mscoree is too often associated with his "cronies". Their mistakes (if they do in fact make any) should not be and aren't a reflection of Mscoree himself, yet they are treated as such. Although I do understand that Ms does make mistakes and did make quite a few in the past, other people's mistakes shouldn't have anything to do with him. SkyGreen24 16:55, January 25, 2015 (UTC)
    • I'm afraid that, whilst I was away, Ms appears to have reverted, at least in part, back to his old self. I am therefore removing my Aye vote and will abstain from the voting. I have also editted my earlier endorsement by striking through sentiments that I no longer hold. Nothing personal, Ms; it'll come some day. Reximus | Talk to Me! 06:06, January 30, 2015 (UTC)
    • Ms didn't revert back to anything. Good to hear it's working though. Harvenard2 (talk) 11:46, January 30, 2015 (UTC)


Saturn is a very active member of our community. His TL, Hitler The Artist, and his massive contributions to map games was cause for his nomination in the stirlings for Best New Contributor. He is active on chat and has even created a guide to aid new users looking at joining map games. Thus, I hereby nominate Saturn120 Toby2: THEY CALL ME Mr. Awesome!!! 00:44, March 8, 2015 (UTC)

  • Discussion

We have no need for any more TSPTF members at the moment, in my honest opinion. Although Sat would make a good constable, he needs to work on his maturity. Sat is definately a candidate if we get a boom of new users, perhaps nearing the Summer. Roman-spqr-flag.png Consul Ioshua (Talk) SPQR EMBLEM.jpg

My concern is the same as Josh's. Although I like Sat, I don't think he's ready for constable. I am that guy (talk) 01:01, March 8, 2015 (UTC)

While I agree that we have way too many TSPTF members, I also believe that we have to many inactive TSPTF members. We should streamline the force, recruit new members, and promote longtime members such as Crimson and MP to Brass. The Hurian Database Wiki Vivaporius"I don't need a slogan" 01:13, March 8, 2015 (UTC)

First of all, Thank you Toby for the nomination. Why I would want to be a constable would be the fact that I am a very active member and person in the chat community. My timelining skills might not be as active as others, but I think I have usually settle arguments inbetween individual users well and have undone a good amount of vandalism by trolls. Although some users may say I am too immature for the position, I think that other users should work on theirs as well. It's a whole chat-wide thing, imo. Therefore, I accept this nomination. Saturn120 01:48, March 8, 2015 (UTC)

As an fyi, Sat - my vote isn't a strike against you, necessarily, or that I think you'd necessarily do a bad job. I just don't think you're ready at this time. So you know. Lordganon (talk) 10:41, March 17, 2015 (UTC)


Feudalplague is a very active member on alt hist wiki and has made many contributions on map games, editing them, correcting them for accuracy and mediating disputes. He has been a member for almost two years and has around 6,700 edits. He is very active on chat and accessible via his talk page. He would make a positive addition and help improve this wikia. --Daeseunglim (talk) 02:33, March 8, 2015 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Opposers
    • I am voting no because to be honest I think Feud needs time without the stress to figure things out. He seems to not always be mentally there in chat, in the past few months having a number of explosive incidents that I believe were questionable. I haven't really seem him resolve disputes, much to the contrary. For example see the recent controversy banning Ms, where he didn't help, but rather threw his opinion into the fray and seemingly made things worse. He claims to be a successful moderator for popular games, but if I recall his actions as a moderator in PM3 are what got the whole game against him, and basically forced him to resign. I haven't seen him make amends with anyone really, let alone Viva. And for the most part I have not seen him talk respectfully (maybe because he tends to argue with me). Not to mention the numerous times he's been drunk or high on chat (recently he stated that substance abuse has not decreased), and the many times his friends have logged on to his account. I'm sorry Feud, I understand you have personal issues, and I feel for you, but I unfortunately must vote no. Harvenard2 (talk) 03:48, March 8, 2015 (UTC)
    • Cannot give support to this. Lordganon (talk) 11:46, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
    • I was originally on Feud's side, but just sitting in chat for a moment gave way to another incident by him, so I am voting no. Tr0llis (talk) 12:16, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
    • NFSreloaded (talk) 10:29, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
    • Fritzmet (talk) 14:19, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
    • Ratcolor (talk) 13:33, March 15, 2015 (UTC)
    • Emperor Eric XV of Sweden - Sugar Rush Art.png Eric von Schweetz T C IM] boarder
  • Discussion

I will accept this nomination, Thank you daes. I have been a rather active member for 2 years now (with a few months away to handle my own personal issues) During which i have been relatively willing to resolve disputes and help people out, i have attempted my own TL's but due to lack of time to really do research i have not really had time to work on them, but i have made some notable advisements of other peoples Time lines and continue to do so. As well as this i have moderated, and continue to moderate two of the wikis biggest mapgames with relatively good results (even going against the grain to a good degree to acheive a solid result). I also have done a few vandalism fights over the past year, mostly just reverting edits, not having to take it to TSPTF page to handle (usually cause someone was there to handle it on chat). As for issues i have had with other users, i usually have one extremely hostile user for the past two elections of which i have made amends with, Particularly Viva, me and him have worked well past our differences and are able to speak to eachother respectfully and like grown adults. I wish to promote this behaviour as well to prevent vendettas or hatred against users (without good reason) If accepted i will work to promote this behaviour, fight further vandalism, and attempt to promote growth of the Wiki as well. 

The Wings of Freedom #FP Wings of freedom 2.png (Talk to Me)


JoshTheRoman has been on here for a good deal of time as of now, and in that period of time, he has accomplished more than most of us have in our whole careers. His flagship timeline, Bellum Romanum, made with the help of Mscoree, is well-written, thought-provoking, and very well organized. He remains active on that timeline, alongside several smaller ones with very interesting PoDs and a couple of map games. Josh also is often on chat and interacting with the community, offering help to many users on their various endeavors. I have no doubt that he will be an asset to the TSPTF if he makes it. —Bfoxius (talk)

  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • ​I want to thank Bfoxius for the nomination, as I accede this nomination. I would be inclined to point out that I usually spend most of my time (not gaming, out with friends ir loved ones, or doing school-related work) here, at the Alternate History Wiki. I frequently try and be a benefactor to the wiki at all times. I try and help newcomers feel welcomed and if they are ready, start a timeline (I recently created a small guide). At times, doing requests of banners for any timeline that asks for it. I truely hope that I get elected as member of the TSPTF. I would also like to thank all my supports during this nomination, and once again, accept it. Roman-spqr-flag.png Consul Ioshua (Talk) SPQR EMBLEM.jpg
    • This page alone should indicate that Josh is an asset to the community. Excelsior! Benkarnell (talk) 15:46, April 12, 2015 (UTC)


Upvoteanthology has been here, on this wiki for about half a year, but has contributed much more than any other person on this wiki per month. Upvote's main and flagship timeline, Vikings in the New World, has attracted much attention and has gained quite a fanbase. Trumping 234 pages and counting as the date of this nomination, Vikings in the New World has definitely become a timeline to serve as an example. Even disregarding his timeline, Upvote has served this community in many other ways, such as creating extraordinary maps or graphics and creating outstanding timelines such as Diversa Pars. Upvote has been greatly trusted by the community as an example of him being a moderator or owner of Alternate Nations 4 or Axis vs Allies. In addition to this, Upvote is frequently on chat. I put trust in this nomination that if it succeeds, Upvote will indubitably be a commendable member of the TSPTF. - JoshTheRoman


  • LightningLynx has been a wonderful contributor to our community lately, contributing to pieces such as Grand UnionReverse a Dragon and a Titan, as well as other pieces. LL has also been a decent chat user, not getting too worked up and taking care of situations sanely, which I think is a sure sign that he's capable of this task. He also shows leadership and maturity, which are key pieces to the wiki. I think would be a mistake not to vote him in. Saturn120 22:52, October 4, 2015 (UTC)
  • Supporters
  • Objectors
    • If this is the kind of attitude they have with an admin, I'd cringe at the thought of what they'd do as an admin.[1][2][3] A BIG no vote from me. -- NuclearVacuum Russian America 23:08, October 4, 2015 (UTC)
    • Spartian300 (talk) 16:04, October 5, 2015 (UTC)
    • Not feeling it, sorry I am that guy (talk)
    • Sorry, but I see this only leading to more problems. Lynx is notorious for exploding on people in chat and clashing with the TSPTF on occasion. It's no good having TSPTF members who only cause conflict with each other, it's important to be able to work well and communicate within. Furthermore I have concerns about Lynx's maturity/ability, he hasn't done much anti-vandalism work for example in recent memory, and on chat I've only seen him cause problems (troll, antagonize, curse constantly), not solve them. Harvenard2 (talk) 23:47, October 6, 2015 (UTC)
    • Although Lynx has made attempts to make amends with people in the past, I still feel his frequent bursts of cursing fits and arguments are a problem. And as noted above Lynx seems proud of his past arguments and subsequent kicks from certain admins, and I don't think a potential moderator should have preexisting problems with the already established TSPTF. Fritzmet (talk)
    • Very obivous reasons I could state for this. But I think that I should refrain from writing essays on the TSTPF page because that seems to be a trend. #PraiseRoosevelt.
    • Although I like Lynx I don't think he's ready for this. I also disagree with what Josh said, Lynx is pretty openly bias toward certain people. Not to mention during Upvote's impeachment Lynx was one of the main people called into question as being a part of a certain group (and a part of its seemingly bias or unfair actions). Tr0llis (talk)
    • No Bloody way. Lordganon (talk) 11:40, October 8, 2015 (UTC)
    • Perhaps a few months ago, but not anymore.             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR   23:22, October 9, 2015 (UTC)
    • He swears a lot, and has insulted me. Vatonica
    • Sorry Lync but your barely active and you swear a lot when your on chat. Awesome history 28 (talk) 17:03, October 16, 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    • This is really cool actually. I thank Sat for the nomination and hopefully I can do this wiki proud. I can promise you I will not be a 100% perfect mod, no one can. I don't think any mod can be perfect. Though hopefully I can do this wiki proud in a sense. I have been with this wiki for a long time now, I think 3 years almost. I've seen a lot of changes occur and hopefully I can help move this place forward and make it better...... Because I'm Just... Too... SSSWWWEEEEEETTT!!!
    • I find it funny that two people like Harv and Fritz would try and vote against me. When I in the past have made up with Fritz and have moved on from him. Even going as far as making sure we don't acknowledge one another. Yet he seemingly forgets that he is the antagonizer and the one who indeed causes the most trouble on chat. The same could also be said for Harv. ..... Because I'm Just... Too... SSSWWWEEEEEETTT!!!


I would like to nominate Ace009 for constable. He has proven to be a trustworthy, polite, and reliable user. I find him to a great help around the wiki, and he has contributed to several TLs. He is, frankly, one of the best users on here. Spartian300 (talk) 16:04, October 5, 2015 (UTC)

  • Discussion
    • As much as I'd like Ace as a mod, he will only cause trouble for the wiki. He is also very biased. AM
    • 2 things, Edge. 1. It is in the past. 2. How am I biased, Andreas? And to be frank, I have considered this and honestly, Spartian, I respectfully decline your nomination. I am just not ready for TSPTF responsibility. And this is truly with all honesty. Through Stars We Rise. (Welcome to the Universe). 01:11, October 9, 2015 (UTC)
    • I thought this was a joke at first but apparently it isn't. ~ Scraw 23:22, October 9, 2015 (UTC)


Kaori, often referred to as WILD, is a very non biased, polite, and mature user on the wiki. While he does not have many edits here, he is certainly very active on chat and also manages several wikis of his own. WILD has also been a member here for a good amount of time and is certainly able to handle responsibility. Instating WILD as a Constable would be very beneficial to us and our wiki's security. United Republic

  • Supporters
    • ​Wild is a nice user, and fits all requirements. I understand that he's newer, but the best of the current candidates. Vatonica (talk) 02:34, October 10, 2015 (UTC)
  • Objectors
    • Barley active. Hasn't done anything to warrent this. #PraiseRoosevelt.
    • Sorry WILD, I just think you need more time and experience before I think you are capable of anything. From what I have heard and seen, it's not easy being a TSPTF member, and I still think you have a lot of ways to go before I can consider you. Saturn120 22:36, October 9, 2015 (UTC)
    • Fritzmet (talk) 22:45, October 9, 2015 (UTC)
    • Too new of a user, as well as too inactive and too inexperienced. Cookiedamage (talk) 22:45, October 9, 2015 (UTC)
    •             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR   23:22, October 9, 2015 (UTC)
    •  NuclearVacuum Russian America 02:13, October 10, 2015 (UTC)
    • No bleedin' way. Lordganon (talk) 04:49, October 10, 2015 (UTC)
    • The best of the candidates but he's new and he needs more experience to become a mod. If wild was more active and a more established user then ill vote for him. Awesome history 28 (talk) 17:03, October 16, 2015 (UTC)
    • —Bfoxius (talk)
  • Discussion


Sometimes I forget that Edge isn't actually in the TSPTF because he basically acts like he is all the time. He has all of the attributes of a good TSPTF member, has lots of experience on the wiki, and can deal with and resolve dispute. He has also been diligent in informing us of events in the past and I think making him a constable in the next logical step. Edge should have been a constable a while back and he should definitely become one now.             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR   21:26, November 18, 2015 (UTC)

No thank you, Sir.

  • Discussion
    • I shall abstain (for now) Toby2: THEY CALL ME Mr. Awesome!!!
    • I'm debating whether or not to vote in favor or against. Edge has not been active at all for about a week or two. War Ensign of Germany 1903-1918.svg Guten Tag. Sprechen Sie mit der Kaiser hier. Flag of North German Confederation (jack).svg
    • Edge has not reponded to this nom in some time. I will remove it. Scraw 17:23, November 29, 2015 (UTC)
    • I did say I was going on vacation. Would have been nice to have a talk page notice. Too late now? #PraiseRoosevelt.
    • Going to go ahead and Accept the nomination. I plan on become an active chat memeber once more. I reguarlly solve conflicts without the use of moderator powers. With mod powers, I could continue to do so. #PraiseRoosevelt. 03:10, December 2, 2015 (UTC)


Nathan is intelligent and knows how to deal with people who are not. In my mind, this makes him an ideal candidate for the TSPTF. He can be trusted and has shown good judgement in the past. He is also one of the most active users right now, especially in chat, where he would be able to use his powers most usefully. I think Nathan is a great candidate with a great future in the TSPTF and I was going to nominate him weeks ago but I forgot.             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR   21:26, November 18, 2015 (UTC)


I think that after getting rid of several inactive TSPTF, we need to bring in new people to the TSPTF. Fires is a very active user, who has developed good relationships with many members of the wiki. I think he can do the job well. Vatonica (talk) 02:09, January 28, 2016 (UTC)


Feud has been a member of the wiki since 2013, he won a sterling for best new contributor and he has grown as a person since then. He has recently shown his level-headedness in chat and his dedication towards  the community via 95T so I believe he is ready to become a constable of the TSPTF SkyGreen24 15:20, March 2, 2016 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
    • I love feud but I don't think he has been active enough recently Flag of Russian Alaska (HR).svg OCT MARIUS, Hail Marius User talk:Octavian Marius
    • لا إله إلا الله † وعيسى ابن الله 01:49, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
    • Reximus | Talk to Me! 01:34, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
    • Like him as a guy, like him as a contributor, but I have the same reservations as Rex & Edge. FP(Now 10% edgier!!!) 16:54, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
    • The Xania Encyclopedia Wiki Vivaporius"I don't need a slogan" 01:31, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
    • I have made up my mind. This will be a fairly long post, but stay with me here as I try to justify this. Feud is a great contributor. Although I will continue to defend his legitimacy as a fair user and map game mod, I can not foresee any good coming out of his nomination as a mod. Feud is arguably the first user on this wiki who I would consider my friend, and he helped me come to understand how things work and ultimately paved the path for me to become a Pm3 mod, and eventually constable. But his time in Pm3 had many questionable decisions. Too many times he was stuck in the gray area when it came to the efficacy of his actions and decisions, both as a player and as a mod. Although he has noticeably improved, what I have observed from 95T and especially Dawn of War has left me with the conclusion that he is still to often in the gray area. This has lead to him returning to his status as a polarizing user, with several of the people who voted Yes for him here believing he should be removed as a 95T mod because of his often stubborn appearance. Although he has made a return appereance with the launch of 95T, After his last attempted return with Dawn of War, I am left to question how long he will remain here. I apologize Feud, I hope you understand my reservations that have led me to vote no. #PraiseRoosevelt. 02:52, March 16, 2016 (UTC)
    •             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR   23:23, March 16, 2016 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    • I accept this nomination. Would definitely like to see my advancement in the community and took alot of time off to work on myself and fix alot of my previous attitude issue. As it stands i would really like to get back into the wiki and advance within the administrative system and really be help to the site in general.
    • I'm choosing to abstain. Let me justify this before you tell me I'm backstabing a friend or anything. I think his current status a a mod in 95T has shown his dedication, but has also made him a polorizing user, even among the TSTPF ranks. I have no doubts about Feud's ablity, but his status as a chadmin would excacrbate certin issues that must be adressed first and foremost. #PraiseRoosevelt. 03:47, March 9, 2016 (UTC)
    • I will probably also object, mildly. Again, Feud is a great guy and a real workhorse, but I have a few reservations. The first would be that he is unproven as a Chat Admin, where he is regulary heartily invovled in debates. Without attacking any other current TSPTF'ers in particular, we have recently seen how oft-debating users with Chat Admin powers can backfire. Secondly, I get the impression Feud doesn't see himself as active. This is proven when he states "[a]s it stands I would really like to get back into the wiki." Now, Feud has been away from the wiki for a little bit, but his recent return has largely been limited to 95T, and not general administrative functions, let alone timelineering. Some great users are better in the user base than in the TSPTF base. Reximus | Talk to Me! 01:34, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
    • Feud has issues with authority. While I do not doubt his committment to responsibility, one too many occassions has he abused his power, times I have predicted and pointed out time and time again. Perhaps another time, but not now. And Rex has a point. Feud normally isn't active on the wiki, and when he is, he tends to leave rather quickly. Feud himself has stated that he is always busy, so at what point would Feud be able to execute his duties as a constable? There are other users out there are more active and willing to regulate themselves with regards to the powers they have been given. The Xania Encyclopedia Wiki Vivaporius"I don't need a slogan" 01:31, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
    • I share Edge's sentiments except I spell them correctly. -Scraw 04:05, March 12, 2016 (UTC)
    • I share Scraw's entiments but I am not annoying. #PraiseRoosevelt. 01:45, March 14, 2016 (UTC)
    •  *sentiments -FP(Now 10% edgier!!!) 12:18, March 14, 2016 (UTC)
    • I would like to just point out that Feud hasn't been on the wiki - let alone contributed - for four days now. This just goes to show, what I see, as his relatively sporadic level of activity: here and then gone. Again, he is a great user and contributor, but the fact he cannot stay active at least during his TSPTF nomination is a bit disturbing and an indicator for the future. Reximus | Talk to Me! 05:19, March 18, 2016 (UTC)
    • I Took a trip to Colorado for Spring break and also had friends in town for spring break. As much as i love this wiki, spending time with friends i havent seen in 6 months took some precedence. The Wings of Freedom #FP Wings of freedom 2.png (Talk to Me)

United Republic

Here is a user I believe to be criminally underrated. He is someone who cares about the future of the wiki, and has written some kickass timelines to show for it. Definitely think he is ready for the next step. #PraiseRoosevelt. 01:30, March 10, 2016 (UTC)

  • Discussion
    • I graciously accept the nomination bestowed upon me. I want to become more involved in this wiki, and I know being a TSPTF mod will certainly help me achieve that. While, in the past, my behavior was unsatisfactory, I know that I will be a better user now than I was then. Coat of Arms of the United States (King of America).png Long Live the King! Colonial Flag of the American Empire (King of America).svg
    • I personally tend to like UR, but I just don't see him as the type of unifying user who we ought to have on the TSPTF. After conversing with other users on chat, it has become apparent that, while UR has the potential to do great things in the future, this nomination has come a bit prematurely. Reximus | Talk to Me! 16:58, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
      • After reconsidering and talking with a wider variety of users, I will abstain. Good luck, UR. Reximus | Talk to Me! 04:52, March 16, 2016 (UTC)
    • I must respectfully disagree with Rex on this one. UR has proven to me on a number of occassions that he is both responsible and amicable toward other users. I would be proud to give him my seal of approval, and I would encourage others to recognize that UR has what it takes to be a reponsible representative of this wiki as a constable. The Xania Encyclopedia Wiki Vivaporius"I don't need a slogan" 01:35, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
    • I fully and absolutely support UR's progressive and reformer ideals. Vatonica (talk) 02:00, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
    • I feel that UR can be immature at times and does not know how to stop when someone tells him to stop. He is a good on his TL, but in the chats he is a different person. In the futere if he could mature he would be a fine for the position. - Scarlet Outlaw
    • For the sake of clarity, and so potential voters can better judge UR's suitability as a Constable, I would like to bring to light this event from September last year, in which UR displayed some rather irresponsible behaviour. Personally, I am keeping my vote for UR, because I think he has grown since then into a much more mature and responsible user, but I thought I'd remind you all of this event for the record. FP(Now 10% edgier!!!) 21:37, March 17, 2016 (UTC)
      • I do very much regret those despicable and inhumane acts that I committed against several users; as well as complete disregard for the wiki's laws. I trust that my supporters, and even my opponents, will know that what happened in the past is in the past, and that it is the man's current character that counts. Coat of Arms of the United States (King of America).png Long Live the King! Colonial Flag of the American Empire (King of America).svg
      • Despite UR's apology, the above has caused me to change my vote. I think that, though I like UR, I do not want this king of drama within the TSPTF. Vatonica (talk) 20:36, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
      • 'King of Drama' is a tad excessive methinks. FP(Now 10% edgier!!!) 21:26, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
      • I'm very sorry. I meant to say "kind" not "king". Vatonica (talk) 23:11, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
      • Haha I'll let you off then. FP(Now 10% edgier!!!) 19:02, March 23, 2016 (UTC)


We've recently discovered that there is a lack of constables in the TSPTF. In fact, the Brass+Lt outnumber Constables, something which isn't quite intended to ocurr. So what to do? Nominate someone! And personally, I see FP as my go-to option. He's been here since 2011, so he's here longer than many of the current TSPTF members. He's a very level-headed person, who does not get into fights with other users and is fairly respected among his peers. He also lives in the UK, which means we'd have chatmods to cover the times where most of the American TSPTF is asleep or crying. He has shown dedication in the wiki lately and has finally been active for a longer while. Last but not least, he's sensual. SkyGreen24 18:48, April 5, 2016 (UTC)

Everyone's Favorite School Girl, Kaori! Kaorischool burned.png

  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • I accept this (rather sensual) nomination, and I really hope that (if accepted) I can help wherever I can to keep this place running, and assist in its rise back to the bygone days of glory. I'll try my best to keep vandals out, keep good contributors in, and keep things civil and constructive. I also get fed up with constant chat flame wars, so it would be nice to keep that in check, without killing the freedom of chat. FP(Now 10% edgier!!!) 11:36, April 7, 2016 (UTC)
    • Oct, I wrote that bio in September of last year when I had just returned from a year-long absence. I have since rarely missed a day. But thank you for reminding me of that, I was meaning to fix it at some point. FP(Now 10% edgier!!!) 14:11, April 11, 2016 (UTC)


WILDSTARSKAORI (or WILD for short) is a very trustworthy and active user on this site. WILD has operated several wikis and has been very successful in keeping order and organization. Not to mention WILD is one of the most likable and peaceful users on chat. For this, I certainly believe WILD should be granted the title of Constable.

United Republic #FeelTheUR TSPTF Badge.svg

  • Discussion
    • Viva why did you vote twice? Blason comte fr Anjou.svgBy the grace of god Count of maine, Forcalquier, Anjou, and Provence, prince of albania and his highness the dauphin of France Belial. 15:49, June 15, 2016 (UTC)
    • WILD is not nominated for admin, WILD is nominated for constable. @Sean ~UR
    • Viva's remark under "objections" is not a vote against WILD, but rather a remark in favor. At best it is a response to the opposition. At worst, it cancels out his support. --SouthWriter (talk) 16:26, June 15, 2016 (UTC)
    • Ok so I am going to try and keep this brief but I will explain my opposition in a way that is coherent as possible. First, I challenge people to think to themselves of one thing that Wild had done since joining the wiki, without checking his user page first. If you are able to think of anything, its probably Land of Empires (I asked the users on chat and this is also what I got). So when evaluating my vote, I went to check Land of Empires. If you pull up this page, there is some troubling things here. First and foremost there has been little progress, but secondly, the main page admits that there will be inconsistencies in the timeline. Now none of this is to undermine Wild's contributions, but there have been users who have done far, far more for the wiki and have been rejected. Three times at that (looking at Feud). Wild is a likeable and peaceful user, but those do not merit promotion to the TSTPF. #PraiseRoosevelt. 02:15, June 16, 2016 (UTC)
    • Okay, a little bit of administrative direction here.  First, Wild has not posted a defense as to why she has accepted the nomination.  Second, UR did not include the date on his nomination.  It is better to use the built in signature format (four tildes), especially in these cases.  No voting should have begun without Wild actually accepting by posting reasons why she wants the position.  As far as the objections, to object a nominee because a "better" candidate did not get elected in the past, imho, is rather lame.  The objectors casting "no" votes for "chat admin" have entered the wrong "voting booth"  In closing, until Wild formally accepts the nomination with a public statement, she is not on the ballot and the time limit is not in force. --SouthWriter (talk) 16:41, June 16, 2016 (UTC)
    • I hereby officially accept the nomination for the constable. Lot's of love,

Everyone's Favorite Girl, Kaori! Kaori.png 23:05, June 16, 2016

    • There you have it, folks. Voting is now officially started. Tell us why you want the job, Wild. --SouthWriter (talk) 04:32, June 17, 2016 (UTC)
    • First off I don't understand any of the objectors reasons for why wild hasn't been a mod. One of the reasons wild says stuff not appropriate for mods so what? I have seen numerous TSPTF members often say very inappropriate stuff and insult users and wild rarely does this with the image being a regular example. Secondly not nomming wild because fires wasn't nominated is an idiotic reason, that's like saying you don't want a xbox because you couldn't get a Play station and besides these reasons no users have stated their qualms with wild as an user which is on of the few users who doesn't start flame wars and generate trash on chat, and has proven his effectiveness as a mod on his other wikis. Blason comte fr Anjou.svgBy the grace of god Count of maine, Forcalquier, Anjou, and Provence, prince of albania and his highness the dauphin of France Belial. 03:12, June 17, 2016 (UTC)
  • It seems that we have a tie if we consider all votes valid and let them stand. We have plenty of time, though. I think we have to verify those objectors that don't know what we're voting on. --SouthWriter (talk) 04:32, June 17, 2016 (UTC)
  • Kaori, could you please tell us why you want this job? Accepting the nomination is only part of the process. It is also required that you tell us why you want the office, and the responsibilities, that come with being a constable. I will reserve my judgment as to even vote (not being particularly active) until this requirement is fulfilled. SouthWriter (talk) 19:45, June 24, 2016 (UTC)


Rex is an experienced, active, and good contributor to our wiki. He has something around 20,000 edits, and has been on the wiki since 2013. He is good at keeping the wiki organized, and has categorized and spell checked a fair amount of pages. He has modded many map games, most recently Game of Nations and Principia Moderni 4. Overall, he is a great user, and helps make this wiki a fun place to be on. For those reasons, I think he should be awarded the position of constable.

-Fires, The Centiqueer Beluga Whale (Respect my identity!)
  • Discussion
    • I would like to thank Fires for the nomination, accept, and outline the reasons why I believe I would make a fine community servant as a TSPTF'er. In the past, when a nomination to the TSPTF faced me (both times which I declined), I thought of it as a way to gain more power. That is the wrong mindset to have going into this office, and I now realize just how much it is about being a servant to others on the wiki. I've attempted to help others in a much deeper capacity in recent times and I believe I've also grown more mature from when I joined many years ago. I believe that, as a TSPTF member, I can help speak for the community as well as continue to perform regular fixes to our community. As you all know, I've been on crusades against improper grammar/spelling (not on Eoguy proportions, but still) and against categorization which go against the Wiki Rules. I humbly ask for your vote so that I can represent you at the TSPTF level. Thank you once again. I'd also be more than willing to address any concerns that may be raised in potential opposition. Reximus | Talk to Me! 17:57, June 23, 2016 (UTC)
    • Since Fires has neglected to do so I will note the time of the nomination as 17:56, June 23, 2016 (UTC). Seriously guys, it's not that hard to put one extra ~. FPNow 10% edgier!!! 21:13, June 23, 2016 (UTC)
    • My sig is on subst meaning it drops all the code of the template when I do ~ ~ ~ ~ so i just put in the template name like this Prince Octavian , of Jerusalem, Sicily, and Swabia, and Duke of Amalfi. Coat of Arms of Oct as Duke of Almafi.svg. Prince Octavian , of Jerusalem, Sicily, and Swabia, and Duke of Amalfi. Coat of Arms of Oct as Duke of Almafi.svg
    • Ok so I am going to abstain for the time being. I should also note that at the time i submit this, there are no regular user votes. My grounds for abstaining are as follows: While Rex has shown to have cleaned up his act, I have to hesitate to support his nomination given how he handled things in PM3, and with PM4 starting again I have to wonder wether the problems I had with his actions will resurface soon. On the same vein, he has done an extensive amount of work on PM4, so I can not bring myself to vote no. I will think on it and read what people have to say about it. #PraiseRoosevelt.
    • Notice that this is for constable, and Rex is in all ways compotent to become a chat mod.  40pxConsul Ioshua

#Beware! TSPTF Badge.svg 17:11, June 24, 2016 (UTC)


Since his last nomination LL has shown massive improvements in his attitude, his outbursts almost never occur, and he has made amends with many of the people who he used to be on bad terms with (Or they where cronies who where banned). I think him becoming chadmin would only help him to improve more, and I think that he would be able to help the wiki. Now people may think he will abuse any power given, but we always have the impeachment process should that occur, and I don't think LL would be the type to do such a thing. #BRINGBACK THESQUIRREL 01:11, August 1, 2016 (UTC)


Another week another constable nomination. I can't put in words how happy I am to say this: Upvoteanthology has returned! After a messy impeachment she left us, but it's safe to say that a majority are rejoiced to see her.

Let's skip the emotions, Upvote has been a wonderful editor and is ready to get back to working on the wiki and for the wiki. I hope the wikians agree with me.

SkyGreen24 21:53, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

  1. Practicality: With the sheer amount of chadmins,admins, and brass, it is not uncommon to see a chat that has more active moderators than users. Electing Upvote will have no practical benefit. We don't need more chadmins. Josh, Nate, Ur, Scraw, Mp, Sky, Viva, Me, and to a lesser extent Toby, are all active members of chat with chadmin powers. When chat only has 10-20 users on at a time, we don't need more than what we currently have, and I know some believe that we have too many chadmins currently. 
  2. Eligibility: Upvote's eligibility is left open to interpretion, and that shouldn't be the case. Upvote, including edits conducted today, has had 43 edits in the past year. Upvote has not activily contributed in over a year, and this is not as if her edits where epic novels that changed the landscape of the wiki. Many of these edits have simply been votes for or against certain users nominations to the TSTPF. The requirments state that a user must have 6 months of active contributions. Upvote hasn't been active in a year.
  3. Precedent: Let us analyze a similar case: ForsakenPear, hence refered to as FP. FP has a simlar case to what Upvote is going through. He came back after a period of inactivity and was well recited. After a few weeks of active editing, FP was nominated for chadmin, and won by a sufficient margin. However, Fp has now vanished. Now he may come back in the coming weeks and months, but what is to say that he will? The issue committed here is that we nominated someone only a few weeks after making a return, when there was nothing to indicate that there return was long term. Upvote has only had a few hours on the wiki before she was nominated for chadmin. Are we just going to nom every popular user for a promotion every time they take a vacation? If Nate left for 6 months and came back, would we nom him for Admin? Noming upvote before she has even had a day to prove her commitment is wrong and sets a bad precedent
  4. Now let me explain the issue behind Corrective Justice. Corrective Justice refers to when an individual offers some sort of repayment for a past injustice. Now this may not be an example of corrective justice, but having talked to several users who have voted for Upvote today has led me to the conclusion that many see this as a chance to "correct" Up's impeachment. While many may not see the problem with this, let me explain. If we vote for Upvote now as a means to correct the past, we will never be able to move forward. Rather than having her be promoted of her own merit, her potion as chadmin will always be because she was wronged. Anytime Upvote gets into an argument, or comits an abuse of power, we will be brought back to Upvote's impeachment. The only way to move on is to accept the past is the past, and to allow Upvote to climb the ranks as any other user would.

I have more that can be added, but I would rather keep things at a civil level. I hope that we can discuss this intellgently, because the users on chat that supported this acted childish and immature. #BRINGBACK THESQUIRREL 01:04, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

  • Josh, put your signature in a template. KAORI, your signature is too big. Scraw 21:33, August 16, 2016 (UTC)
  • I will make the same pledge as Scraw, here, for all to see. If Upvote is still around and active in 6, hell even 3 months, I will support her for chadmin. #BRINGBACK THESQUIRREL


Andy is a prominent user of the newer generations. He is often active, a calm and reasonable person, excluding his excessive sighing. I personally consider him a great candidate for chatmod, seeing as he always tries to help people on chat and reports vandals and trolls to me ASAP. I personally would also like to have another european chat mod to keep peace during hours where the majority are asleep. In conclusion, #Andy4Mod2k16 SkyGreen24 19:54, October 1, 2016 (UTC)

  • Discussion
    • I feel really jaded for this nomination, and I was half-jokingly suggesting it, but I will accept this nomination. I feel we need more chadmins during more inactive hours; Sky is not going to cut it alone. Thanks again for the support. Wolves
    • Am I the only one who noticed Josh voted "first"? Haha... Reximus | Talk to Me! 15:09, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
    • A Much needed level headed mod -Feud
    • Met him for 10 seconds, seems chill ~Gunny Bunny
    • I have been convinced to change my mind. For now #BRINGBACK THESQUIRREL


I would nominate Firesofdoom to the position of constable. A prominent user of the newer generation, he is an user fit for such a task, helping out everyone, very responsable and very calm. He is more than fit to be part of the TSPTF and for this, I nominate him for modship. Deadly State of Mind (talk) 16:06, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • I accept my nomination, and am excited to help work to make this wiki a better, more organized and more fun place. ~Fires
    • I am abstaining my vote until further notice. While I like Fires as a person, I do question his possible effectiveness in the TSPTF. He has gotten involved in feuds with users in recent time (namely LL) and can take up a somewhat controversial attitude similar to that of the cronies. However, I shall cast my vote before the polls are closed; whether it be for or against.
      (Also, we have a lot of active TSPTF members at the moment.)
       United Republic  Talk  Contribs  King of America    18:36, January 8, 2017 (UTC)


Feud really has gone above and beyond. Sure he has had his ups and downs, but I gotta say he has helped countless times, and really deserves this promotion. Feud is a user who can be relied upon to keep things running; a greater problem than vandalism in the recent history of the wiki. As such, I an nominating him for a (much deserved) Constabulary. As they say, third time's the charm.

1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 17:10, June 2, 2017 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • ​I accept on this one :D  Been on the wiki forever, been an active contributor forever as well, i have my own timeline, ive pointed out vandalism, ive modded two of the most prominent map games on the wiki, i give plenty of advice and tips on TL writing as well, i also hope to help incentivise the come back of the Map contests, Short story contests, as well as try to facilitate the development or creation of a new Community Timeline, something that can really get our userbase going in the right directionThe Wings of Freedom #FP Wings of freedom 2.png (Talk to Me)
    • About time too. 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 16:59, June 2, 2017 (UTC)
    • seems legit. With Blood and Iron (talk) 17:16, June 2, 2017 (UTC)
    • I don't think we do have oversaturation to be honest. Most users on the list are retd./on hatius. So probably should update the lists then. Impishly yours, Imp (Say Hi?!) 00:15, June 4, 2017 (UTC)
    • Pinochet was completely correct in his actions on 9/11/73. To this effect, in opposition to the spread of the Communistic threat propagated by some of our members, it is indeed necessary to recruit further among the reactionary forces of the TSPTF. To this end, I support Feud's nomination and hope he will slay many Socialist untermensch. That is all - GBUSA


Person has been a very active contributor on the wiki in the last few months. He has helped the mods on nummerous occasions with situations regarding vandals and has helped us moderate things. I think it's high time he would be nominated for this. Therefore, I nominate him for the position of constable.      Cthulhu.jpg     Wolf hd by arma3lonewolf-d8m9rto.jpg   Deadly State of Mind Leader of the Knights of Scraw.  20:23, April 5, 2018 (UTC)

  • Objectors:
  • Discussion: Well, I didn't think AM would do it when he first suggested it to me. I mean yeah I already spend way to much of my life doing nothing in particular on this wiki, being a constable would give me a better excuse to avoid studying and chill here. I think I am a reasonably calm and almost respected user if not occasionally annoying person which makes for good constable qualities, I am also on European timezone which makes me good for the lack of active European mods when things need sorting. I also 'helped' fix that stupid thing where no one could make new articles by just going straight to CC and asking them to fix it. User:Person67
And it is for these reasons that I support Person's elevation to constable. He has proven himself to be resourceful when the need called for decisive action, and he has an active presence within the community that is felt by the other members of the wiki. I see no one else better suited to the role than Person as of the current date. The Xyon Wikia Vivaporius: "I don't need a slogan" 19:30, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
@Crim: Ok now I respect your right to vote whatever way you wish but let's not let my different political opinions be a stain upon my character when you consider the amount of racist and inflammatory mods we already have. They're my opinions which I am entitled to and they're not extreme even for the moderators we have. You want to vote on way fine there are a lot of reason to object but I don't apologise for having opinions contrary to yours. User:Person67
I'm sorry that it seems like I'm voting against you because I disagree with you politically; I assure you that is not my intention. You are free to practice whatever political ideology you please. However, understand that racism should not be tolerated at all by anyone on the wiki, least of all on the TSPTF. To understand that it seems to be practiced by members of the TSPTF is thoroughly upsetting. I encourage anyone who sees such behavior to report it and it will be dealt with appropriately, mod or no. Curmudgeonly yours - Crim 03:55, April 24, 2018 (UTC)

Crim, didn't you threaten to Gulag some of us at one point? Also, HELL YEAH BROTHER.



It's been some time since we've inducted a new person into the TSPTF and I cannot think of anyone more deserving of this role than Vand. We haven't had someone of this caliber in a while if we're being honest here; the guy's a very talented mapper, he writes detailed althists, and knows how to work a community. Like it or not, map games are a cornerstone of our active community and Vand knows how to not only put together a map game, but keep it fun and enjoyable for those involved, which is no easy task. Furthermore, he is well-liked both on the Discord and the wiki and is always ready and able to provide help to those who ask. I have no doubt in his capabilities to use the powers that come with being a constable responsibly. Let's get this man a role! -Curmudgeonly yours - Crim

  • Supporters:
  • Objectors:
    • He's a great guy, but there's no real need for constables right now. Fires
    • agree with fires, saturation of constables is a problem. Oct
    • -- NuclearVacuum Russian America 23:20, January 20, 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion:
    • Thank you Crim, I appreciate and accept the nomination. Since I've joined the wiki I've done what I can do undo as much vandalism and report as many trolls that I find. I am pretty active on discord, and am usually the one pinging a constable to add roles to someone. I believe I am a pretty levelheaded person and am good at defusing arguments and bad situations on discord, and I hope to continue that as a constable. On the Discord I would say that there on average only four TSPTF members online, of which one to two are constables, compared to the approximately fifty people usually online on the sidebar. I have also experienced many times where I needed a constable's help to use rollback and no one was online at the time, leading me to pinging a bunch of admins for help, so having this role will help a lot with undoing vandalism and fixing pages. Anyway I hope I will make a good addition to the team, and if I don't get in I will continue doing what I can to help the wiki as a user. Thanks, Vandenhoek (talk) 21:48, January 20, 2019 (UTC)


HawkAussie has been an active contributor for years now, doing a great deal of work when it comes to categorizing pages, fixing errors, and doing maintenance on the wiki. Although I have not interacted with HawkAussie much personally, I have observed a lot of helpful additions and contributions. He/she would be a great addition to the TSPTF as a constable. Vandenhoek (talk) 03:41, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Voting deadline is the 30th of July Oh, I didn't mean to push that button!Oh, well leave a message I guess 03:46, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • I've seen HawkAussie's work. He has been an active contributor, who has been cleaning up the wiki. I for one support his nomination.
    • Thank you for the nomination as I do accept this as I am a person who likes to try and contribute in attempting to make this a better place here on the wiki with some maintenance. Flag of Tasmania.svg HawkAussie (Talk) Flag of Australia.svg 10:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
    • Aussie really deserves to be added to the Force. FirstStooge (talk) 15:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)



I have thought this over, and I have decided to withdraw myself from the nominations. I cannot commit myself to this website, no matter how much I'd like to. I am simply not the material you are looking for. I urge you to vote for someone more willing and able to complete the task ahead. South seems ideal. He is focussed, knows his stuff and has an outstandingly wide breadth of knowledge. Thank you. Bob 08:08, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  1. I bwlieve he will do a great job in this position, as he has shown to fair, balanced and very helpful to many user, including myself. Tbguy1992 17:02, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Vegas adict 19:19, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
  3. BoredMatt 19:08, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • A few questions. Has Bob accepted this nomination? If so he does need to explain why he would make a good Lt. Furthemore one of the requirements is that a Lt. be 18 years or older and according to his Facebook page he is only 17 (sorry if this sounds stalkerish Bob but we are friends on Facebook). Nevertheless that requirement will be waived if Bob shows that he has "one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site." Bob you are going to have to address that before I vote. Mitro 19:50, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
    • I must add that this isn't a reflection on the quality of alternate histories offered, because I have had serious concerns about Bob's efforts in that regard at times past. At the same time, Bob has proved tractable by the wider group @ 1983:DD, and I think that Bob could make a fair administrator, provided the questions posed by Mitro are answered. Louisiannan 06:45, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • Why does age actualy matter Mitro, someones age doesn't affect there ability to be an administrator I knew a Thirteen year old who made a very good Admin on another wiki. Why then does it matter that Bob is 17 if he is capable of conducting his duties as an Admin and explains why he wants to be one? Vegas adict
    • Like all other "job descriptions," there have to be some limits. The fact that a 13 year-old proved to be good at managing a wiki does not mean that he could have the knowledge and experience to monitor the time lines of this wiki. That goes for an unexperienced minor even of the age of 17. In a wiki with such complicated subject matter, maturity matters. Alternate history must be based on facts and research, not fantasy and creativity. Seeing the "big picture" comes with having lived life out in the "real world" - with life experiences and research skills that put an editor and writer to the test. This is not a "power play" on the part of adults, but rather a restraint on over-active imaginations when dealing with problems that arise in real life. SouthWriter 19:49, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • South, someone of seventeen might have just as much experience as someone of eighteen and although facts and research are very important in writing Alternate History creativity isn't allways a bad thing. Its the ability to take a creative/crazy idea and back it up with research and facts that makes a good AH writer. I learned that the hard way doing part of my technology coursework last year as well as on other wikis, there's no reason people younger than 18 and with less than a year and a half's worth of contributions aren't capable of having that mix as well. I suppose i'm continuing with this because i am under eighteen and am trying to prove my point without giving you more to use. P.S why do you use quotation marks so much?Vegas adict 21:11, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • South makes some good points, but also Vegas you need to read the next part of the rule: or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site. Thus under that guidelines a 13 year old could be an admin as well. I tried to make this as fair as possible to everyone. Also I gave people weeks to comment on this procedure when it was still a proposal. Such a discussion on the rules/requirements is better left to the talk page, but not someone's nomination. BTW, this nomination is not complete yet. Bob still needs to accept it and explain why he should have the job. Mitro 21:13, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • I am aware of that but to make it truely fair all people applying for Administrator rights should have a year and a half's experience. I am aware that i would not have been able to qualify under that but I am of the belief that neither race, disability, gender or age should effect choosing someone for a job but it should instead be entirely based on there contributions and there relations with other users. I am also aware i should have raised this complaint earlier but when you were asking people to have a look at the new system I was in Devon and Kosovo with very litle internet access. Perhaps this is idealistic but thats what you get for being a member of the UK's youth parliamentVegas adict 21:34, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • Age already effects a person's ability to get a job. How many 15 year olds work for major corporations? Not only that but there is age discrimination that is written into the laws of various countries. Drinking ages, driving ages, age limits on joining the military, child labor laws, voting ages, etc. Nevertheless, maybe you are right about the rule, but I am not going to change midway through a nomination. As long as Bob meets the exception then he is good to go. Mitro 21:45, August 14, 2010 (UTC)


  • Supporters
  1. I'm unsure as to whether South would like to be a lieutenant but if he accepts I believe he will be a great leader on this wiki. He has show over the past few months that he is pragmatic, intelligent and clearly understands the rules of this wiki. --GOPZACK 19:19, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Louisiannan 06:43, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
  3. BrianD 13:54, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Vegas adict 19:20, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
  5. XterrorX 15:17, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  6. BoredMatt 15:39, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  7. I have decide to support both choices, as both of the nominated are good, fair and balanced editors. Tbguy1992 18:46, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  8. --Karsten vK (talk) 08:25, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  9. Lordganon 10:48, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  10. I'd be happy to have you on the TSPTF. Mitro 15:15, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  11. Bob 18:32, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  12. Bill 18:31 (EST), August 16, 2010
  13. Unquestionably one of the most qualified guys around. - Mister Sheen 01:50, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
  14. I'm absolutely, 100% sure South will make an excellent member of the TSPTF.--Vladivostok 12:52, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
  15. Ownerzmcown 23:24, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
  16. Very wise and intelligent, will be a great asset to the TSPTF. Red VS Blue 03:31, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
  17. I've been actice on the website for...maybe 2 weeks, and already South has helped me improve my timeline, and has been very helpful to me. French Victory 19:31, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  18. Eastward Expansion 19:33, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • Has South even accepted the nomination yet? Mitro 14:11, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
      • Yes, I accept the nomination. Thanks, Zack. SouthWriter 18:25, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
      • Cool. So South, why do you want to be a Lt.? Mitro 18:30, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
        • I knew this was coming - based on the guidelines - but have no formal response prepared. So, here is an informal response. As I understand it, the work of a lieutenant is to monitor the articles of the whole wiki - not just the 1983DD time line. This will keep both my creative and editing abilities honed. I presently have some time not available to other editors, so this should not be too much of a strain. This will also free up the constables to do the occasional rollback and deletion of undesirable articles and sections which trolls and vandals seem to love slipping into the wiki at odd times. SouthWriter 19:35, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • I know we have 2 weeks rule (I should know because I was the one who wrote it0, but considering the overwhelming support. Is there any objections if I close this early and make South our newest admin? Mitro 15:34, August 20, 2010 (UTC)


  • Supporters
  1. I think NucVac will be a great Lt, he has lots of experience and is good at dealing with peopleVegas adict 19:32, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
  2. I agree, a very creative editor, good with people, would do great if given the opportunity.--Vladivostok 00:08, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  3. I have worked with Nuke. He is a good editor and is willing to listen to the concerns of others. SouthWriter 15:40, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  4. No issues here, he has my vote. Mitro 16:22, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  5. BoredMatt 19:13, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  6. My vote too. Eastward Expansion 19:35, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Ditto. Tbguy1992 20:32, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Someone not really involved with DD, but would be a great addition to the Lt positions.Lordganon 21:03, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  9. I'll take SouthWriter and Mitro's words on this. BrianD 02:28, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Of course. - Mister Sheen 13:31, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
  11. --GOPZACK 18:08, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
  12. I think he has shown great experience and kindness to others (plus where both Irish American) Riley.Konner 16:01, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
  13. He's got my support. --XterrorX 17:21, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
  14. --Bill Potter 9:15, August 27, 2010 (EST)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • For this nomination to be valid, NV must do 3 things: 1) accept the nomination here, 2) explain why he should be elected, and 3) either prove he is 18 years or older or show a year and a half of solid contributions to this wiki. Mitro 03:44, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
    • Hello there. I am honored to have been nominated to the TSPTF, and I accept my nomination. I would make an excellent addition to the TSPTF because I really love alternate history, and I would love to help out those who love it too. If chosen, I promise to use my powers to protect the time stream, assisting those in need, and capturing and eliminating those who mean harm. I do not recall how long I have been editing here, but I was born in December 1989, and I am currently 20. --NuclearVacuum 12:20, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
    • How does someone prove that they're a least 18? Eastward Expansion 19:35, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
      • The simple answer is that they can't, but Wikia says we must assume good faith and so we doVegas adict 19:38, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
        • Vegas is right, we assume good faith unless proven otherwise. That being said this is the age of social networking. That is how I knew Bob was not 18, I looked on his Facebook profile. Mitro 18:03, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
    • Just a note about this position, LG. The position up for nomination is for the whole wiki, not just DD. It is good that DD is so popular, but there are other time lines that are quite good -- and others that need close scrutiny by the administrators to keep the wiki relevant. We have constables to deal with the "small stuff" (thanks, Arstar and Yank for the unsung and unseen work you do), but the brass and the lieutenants are responsible for monitoring for time lines that need serious work to come to the standards of the whole Althistory Wiki. SouthWriter 21:28, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
      • I'm well aware of that. All I meant was that it was nice to see someone not involved with DD being nominated. >.>;

Lordganon 22:18, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

To number 13 above. You will have to edit that vote after you log in again, otherwise it will have to be thrown out. Not that it matters to the outcome, but we'd like to know who "" is. :-)

SouthWriter 16:34, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

In light of the overwhelming support, any objections to waiving the 2 week rule and promoting Nuke? Mitro 14:02, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
None that I can see. Riley.Konner 16:00, August 27, 2010 (UTC)


  • Discussion
    • Brian is well versed in many aspects of this wiki and has worked hard on quality control. He has not shied away from letting myself or other members of the TSPTF know about problems he has encountered with vandalism, other users, etc. One final note, Brian has accepted the nomination. Zack 21:22, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
    • Honestly, I didn't realize he wasn't already a mod.Oerwinde 08:18, October 9, 2010 (UTC)
    • I accept the nomination, if the community chooses me to be a lieutenant. I joined this wiki for 1983:DD and continue to contribute almost exclusively to that TL, but would be willing to assist with other TLs as requested and needed. I understand the responsibilities that come with being a lieutenant, and wish to carry them out in a helpful and civil manner with all editors. BrianD 17:31, October 9, 2010 (UTC)
    • I'll be happy to answer any questions anyone would have regarding my nomination. BrianD 19:01, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
    • Since there does not appear to be any objections to this nomination, any objections to waiving the 2 weeks rules? Mitro 19:47, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
    • Same as above. Benkarnell 20:22, October 18, 2010 (UTC)


He is one of the most active Constables currently on the TSPTF. I personally have seen him fight vandalism and take heat from the vandals/trolls who sometimes haunts this site. More importantly he has worked to revert the good faith, but irrelevant, edits by anons who do not understand our rules or culture. He is one of the leaders at 1983: Doomsday and respected across the wiki. If I had one complaint, he could be a little more polite, but no one is perfect. I think he would be a perfect Lt. and he has my support. Mitro 20:40, December 13, 2010 (UTC)

  • Supporters
    • I agree with everything said above. It will be great to have you as a part of the team. Zack 23:58, December 13, 2010 (UTC)
    • LG quickly established himself as a leader on this wiki and definitely deserves it.Oerwinde 10:43, December 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • LG has shown that he is more than deserving of admin status. Mitro said it well. BrianD 17:18, December 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • You couldn't ask for much better in a Lieutenant. He has a clear knowledge of history which always helps, but like the rest of us he gets annoyed with those few who spoil it for the rest of us, but unlike some of us, he does something about it. He is more than willing to help us when we ask, giving up his time to help our projects. Mumby 17:43, December 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • LG has done enough to prove that he will make an excellent Lieutenant, he deserves the recognition for the work he has done as a constable dealing with the trolls and vandals recently--Smoggy80 18:59, December 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • I accept the nomination, Mitro, and once again, thank you for the honor. I'm a few years over 18, so that is satisfied. As for why I would like to be a Lt..... well, for starters I've had several instances (as Mitro noticed) where things have been done around here - for instance, one guy kept insulting me one night last week as I fought his sci-fi future histories - and I've only been able to do little about it. I tend to be active on here more often than not during the night, meaning that I do tend to be the first to see a lot of this stuff, and It'd be nice to be able to do more than tell Mitro, or someone else, about it. It would be nice to be able to actually back up warnings I give for things like that (vandals, naming conventions, etc) too, lol. Lordganon 21:08, December 13, 2010 (UTC)


BoredMatt has been a very active force in the Map Games, joining up shortly after I did. He is one of the more level headed of the map gamers, as well as being one of the few that is concerned with plausibility.Oerwinde 04:27, February 5, 2011 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • Matt still needs to accept this nomination for it to be valid. Mitro 15:00, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
    • I can't say how honored I am by this, thank you. I accept the nomination. BoredMatt 16:14, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
    • Matt how old are you? One of the requirements of this job is that the person has to be 18 or over. Do you meet the age requirement? Mitro 20:40, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
    • I'm afraid I don't. You can retract my nomination. BoredMatt 21:14, February 9, 2011 (UTC)


Kath is someone that I've often seen putting things in the proper category, fixing things, and helping others with their timelines. He may not have the best English ever, but he doesn't let that stop him from being helpful. And, he's got an understanding of how a wiki operates, and indeed, he has a good knowledge of our rules as well. He's also the admin in charge of our Spanish-language counterpart. Lordganon 08:42, February 3, 2011 (UTC)

  • Supporters
    • BrianD 18:07, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
    • Mitro 18:33, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
    • Tbguy1992 18:39, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
    • Vegas adict 22:13, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
    • Fedelede 22:37, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
    • KingSweden 04:21, February 4, 2011 (UTC) It's good to have multicultural influence on the admin staff, especially since Spanish might not be everyones strongest language.
    • Red VS Blue 20:54, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
    • Smoggy80 19:37, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
    • BoredMatt 20:30, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • Hi everyone! Thank you Lordganon for the nomination to the TSPTF, is really a honor! I accept the nomination. Despite my level of english as Lord said before, i'm glad if i can help to others in any form, and i think that my knowledges about how is the work in this wikia, can make to me useful for the site. I promise to do my best effort as a TSPTF member, if i'm chosen. Thanks once again. Regards! --Katholico 22:37, February 3, 2011 (UTC)


Tb is an active user on this wiki who has a good understanding of our policies. He is a caretaker of the community project Choose Your Own Alternate History! and the creator of many excellent timelines. He has participated in many of our community projects and map games. I feel he would be an excellent member of the TSPTF. Mitro 14:05, February 3, 2011 (UTC)

  • Discussion
    • I am honored to have been suggested for the TSPTF. Though I know I'm not as active as many other users here, I will do the best I can, to the best of my, admittedly not spectacular, abilities, and to keep up the standards of the Wikia, and will gladly agree to help those who need it. I accept this nomination, and hope to help serve the Wikia soon. Tbguy1992 16:09, February 3, 2011 (UTC)


King is a long-member of the wiki. As the creator of Napoleon's World, he's also one of out best and most prolific writers, with articles contributed to several other timelines as well. He's often willing to help, and to give advice. He's got a good idea of how things work around here, and is very willing to help out when he has time. Lordganon 22:48, February 3, 2011 (UTC)

  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • The nomination is an honor. Thank you. KingSweden 04:20, February 4, 2011 (UTC)


Smoggy, probably our sole female editor, has been editing the wiki for over two years now. She's shown a willingness to help others, or to offer helpful opinions, along with her work editing articles for Doomsday and several timeline ideas of her own that she's started. I also consider her to be one of those among us who are most likely to be a voice of reason, and she has also done a pretty good job with her Constable position. As such, I nominate her for the position of Lieutenant in the TSPTF. Lordganon 17:43, May 18, 2011 (UTC)


Verence has been editing on the wiki for about a year and a half now. Primarily, his editing and advice have been with regards to 1983, but he's got a couple timelines of his own roaming around here, and I've seen him offer advice to others on several occasions. His work on the former UK in 1983 is also very much great in detail. I feel that he is a rather good editor, and he has shown himself very respectful of our rules. I feel that, given his willingness to learn and help out, that he'd do well here. As such, I nominate him for the position of Lieutenant in the TSPTF. Lordganon 22:46, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

  • Supporters
    • Never heard of this dude before, but if LG speaks so highly of him, and he does, and we are in need of more mods up in heah, and we do, I see no reason not to support him. Jazon Naparleon 23:13, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
  • Lordganon has put it better than I could and there's not much I can add to what he has said. If you are interested the other timelines I have on this wiki are Weird America in which the POD is the British gaining a resounding victory in the War of 1812 and The Second Heptarchy in which Harold of England is defeated by Harald of Norway at Stamford Bridge. Verence71 10:41, June 5, 2011 (UTC)


Fed has proven himself since being named a constable to be pretty good at it. He's undone vandalism, warned us about them, warned them, tried to keep people calm and mediate disputes.... the list goes on. He's made several good timelines, and contributed to even more. And, he's always good as a sounding board for things. As such, I nominate him for the position of Lieutenant in the TSPTF. Lordganon 02:10, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

  • Supporters
    • I agree, he has done a great work in the wikia. :) Katholico 04:13, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
    • CrimsonAssassin 23:02, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
    • LurkerLordB 23:03, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
    • --Smoggy80 17:01, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
    • Well, Fed did give me doses of plausibility at times, you deserve this!! :D 1.png Imperium Guy 17:38, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • Thank you for the nomination, LG. I believe I deserve to be a lieutenant because in my time as Constable in the TSPTF I've attempted to stop all vandalism as far as my capacities reach. Even though I don't believe I have that much avaliable time in the Wikia and that my English capacities are not entirely good, I believe that I will be able to make a good member of the lieutnancy on the TSPTF. Fed (talk) 02:56, November 30, 2011 (UTC)


Lurk has been around here for quite a while, and I'm surprised none of us really noticed him and his work before. Something I'm a little sorry for, lol. In dealings with him around the wiki, I've seen him to be quite level-headed, and trying to moderate disputes. He's worked to police the wiki in general, and has fixed a ton of vandalism. Not only that, but he's contributed extensively to the Map Games, a bit to several timelines, and been the author of some good ones of his own. As such, I nominate him for the position of Lieutenant in the TSPTF. Lordganon 10:49, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

  • Supporters
    • -Kogasa Symbol of Natori, Miyagi.png宮城県.pngFlag of Japan.svg 11:13, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
    • He knows our policies, can deal with vandals and has been a member for 2 years. He has my vote. Mitro 22:20, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
    • 1.png Imperium Guy 23:22, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
    • Collie Kaltenbrunner 10:30, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • I would be honored to accept any position which would allow me to better help the wiki. I will use any position I am granted to fight vandalism faster, clean up dead and useless pages, and help to make this wiki a better environment for alternate history. I thank LordGanon and anyone else for believing that I am capable of handling this position. LurkerLordB (Talk) 22:09, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
    • Are there any last-minute objections? LurkerLordB (Talk) 05:03, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

Collie Kaltenbrunner

Collie's been one of our constables now for about 10 months. He's done good work in that span of time, running games and trying to keep the peace in them. Done a pretty good job of it, too - he's shown himself to be rather good at keeping peace and mediating in them. And, in addition, he's written or contributed to several timelines. In a lot of ways, Collie's been a pretty blasted good example of a constable since his promotion. As such, I nominate him for the position of lieutenant in the TSPTF. Lordganon 17:22, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

  • Discussion
    • I accept the nomination.thanks for it (the nomination).maybe it will make moderation on map games easier.--Collie Kaltenbrunner 20:11, April 7, 2012 (UTC)


Feg is one of the veteran users of our wiki - it'll be four years for him here in the summer. He's worked on other wikis over the years, too. In all of that, he's held various admin positions, and was named a constable here 10 months ago. In that timespan, he's done a good job of it. All of this, of course, being in addition to a contributor to many timelines, and the author of a few good ones in his own right. As such, I nominate him for the position of Lieutenant in the TSPTF. Lordganon 17:22, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

  • Discussion
    • I happily accept this nomination! I've got experience as this level of admin before and so I can guarantee I'll be helpful and proactive. Feg 20:02, April 7, 2012 (UTC)


"9" has been a great help with maintaining the wiki since he became a constable - he often ends up undoing damage or adding deletion tags to spam before even I find it, lol - and I'm convinced that he would block the vandals afterwards if he could. He's got several good timelines to his name, and has adopted more. Plays the map games sometimes as well. Have to enjoy all the Touhou Project things he's added to timelines, too. As such, I nominate him for the position of Lieutenant in the TSPTF. Lordganon (talk) 08:50, April 6, 2013 (UTC)

  • Discussion
    • I accept the nomination. I've helped to fight against vandalism and spam as best as I can and will continue to do so. I thank you all again. -Kogasa Miko THPW2.png Flag of Japan.svg 2013年4月06日 18:12:04 (JST)

Imperium Guy

Imp is one of our more interesting characters - seems like he's got fingers in many little pies around here, be in Doomsday, the Map Games, or pestering Nuke about Venusian Haven (lol) and he's got several timelines of his own, adopted and otherwise. I've observed him undo vandalism, and he's got the desire to work the map games, something needed. As such, I nominate him for the position of Lieutenant in the TSPTF. Lordganon (talk) 08:50, April 6, 2013 (UTC)

  • Discussion
    • Nothing too cheesy here folks, but to say its a great honour would be an understatement. I would like to keep sorting out arguments and making sure map games do not clutter this wiki. Although I'm not as good with vandalism as some other members, I will try my best. Thank you. 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 10:46, April 6, 2013 (UTC)

Red VS Blue

Besides the fact that I can't comprehend why he isn't admin yet, Red is active, nice, and has one hell of a timeline under his belt. He communicates with the people and is a good person overall. I don't think I need say more.             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR   00:37, January 24, 2014 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
  • 'Have you actually asked him yet? ~G
  • Dammit I forgot that. ~S
  • This is long overdue. Red vs. Blue's Superpowers timeline was the first timeline I read when I browed the site for the first time years ago. It was what really got me hooked on this wiki. Congrats to Red vs Blue! Banner of the Holy Roman Emperor with haloes (1400-1806).svg Labarum.jpg CrimsonAssassin- I have special eyes
  • I would be happy to accept the position of Lieutenant in the TSPTF. I am neither among the most active members of the Althistory Wiki, nor am I particularly opinionated on major issues that have arisen, but I intend to be a sysop who injects as neutral a view as possible into site-wide debates and who assists with the general cleanliness of the site. Thank you, Scrawland, for the nomination! Red VS Blue (talk) 19:24, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
  • I read all of the Superpowers timeline in one sitting, that was the kind of power the timeline gained on me because of its vastness and interestingness. I have also observed Red to be a neutral voice in wiki matters and is widely respected. Good one Scraw, and Congratz Red. :) 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 01:51, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • Superpowers is indeed one of the best TLs of this site, and Red deserves every single bit of this nomination. Fed (talk) 01:56, January 26, 2014 (UTC) 
  • It's been well past two weeks since this application has been posted. Think it's time to give Red vs Blue his superpowers and close this thing up. Banner of the Holy Roman Emperor with haloes (1400-1806).svg Labarum.jpg CrimsonAssassin- I have special eyes 12:12, February 10, 2014 (UTC)
  • Only Brass is allowed to do so I'm afraid! 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 12:42, February 10, 2014 (UTC)
  • I know. I was trying to summon one. Banner of the Holy Roman Emperor with haloes (1400-1806).svg Labarum.jpg CrimsonAssassin- I have special eyes 13:12, February 10, 2014 (UTC)


I'm actually surprised we haven't made him one yet. Crim is super-helpful, and has his own TL- the quite well done Magnam Europae. I look forward to reading more. He exercises his power as Constable well, and has helped out around the wiki a LOT. Also, he's one of the most senior- agewise- members of this wiki, having joined before several of our other El Tees. For these reasons, I would like to nominate him for this promotion to El Tee. He deserves it, and since we have 15 open spots, haha...         Centriflag.jpeg   Flectere si nequeos superos- Acheronta Movebo!  01:41, January 31, 2014 (UTC)

Monster Pumpkin

MP has been on this wiki for over two years now, and in that time, he's proved himself to be an excellent mediator, an excellent editor, a nice person, and just overall the epitome of what the TSPTF tries to be. He's been an effective and plausible moderator on multiple map games, he's done loads of work on the BFE: Prime TL, along with me and Ms- I have to say, he deserved this earlier. I therefore nominate what's his face our resident Lycanthropic Squash for El Tee. May his reign be long, his vote undisputed, and his decisions, well, if not wise, then popular.             Centriflag.jpeg   Every Silver Lining has it's cloud- And HERE I AM!  00:45, March 24, 2014 (UTC)


Scraw is one of the most senior map gamers on the wiki- not that he doesn't contribute a LOT elsewhere. He's constantly a calming influence on chat, and a productive worker, with several timelines and numerous Stirlings under his belt. He's always plausible, never one for reckless expansionism, and he's also creator of some of the most beautiful sigs on this wiki. Now, that will probably be a problem for some of our users- Pita, Fed, Imp, I'm looking at you- but think of it this way; if you allow Scraw to keep his sig, and become an El Tee nevertheless- then he can be the only exception to that rule since, well, none of the rest of the template crew, myself included, will ever make it to admin, haha. In conclusion, Scraw is a wonderful productive user who deserves this nom every bit, and LG, I'm coming for that record.         Centriflag.jpeg   I'm going to put you in my ashtray  cause you just got smoked!  18:19, April 5, 2014 (UTC)

  • Supporters
  • Objectors
  • Discussion
    • ​In fact, to those of you who dislike this nom because of that sig, tell you what I'll do. I will perform the 12 tasks of Guns to get this through- 12 favors that, no matter what they are, I shall do. There are two things I won't do- get rid of my sig and fix my userpage. ANYTHING else. Imp, think of the fight I'll put up to liberate Gansu. Fed, think of the fight I'll put up to push through the Squirrevolution. I will do neither if you allow Scraw to keep his sigs.         Centriflag.jpeg   I'm going to put you in my ashtray  cause you just got smoked!  18:22, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
    • Hrr, yes. I most gratefully accept this nomination for lieutenant. I intend to do my best to uphold the standards of this wiki and do lieutenantly things. I will seek to combat vandalism and all those weird one sentence pages about Charlemagne battling King Kong and the such. I will continue to fight the battle against trolls and stupid people, and I will take on a more active role in tackling idiocy in chat. Also if you have doubt in my abilities, you can read the true legend of my life on my userpage. That is all.
    •             Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg    SCRAWLAND INVICTUS || REX IMPERATOR  
    • Does not over expand? Erm... 1.png Imp (Say Hi?!) 19:09, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
    • Ok, well, hasn't done it so far in PM3. How's that?         Centriflag.jpeg   I'm going to put you in my ashtray  cause you just got smoked!  19:21, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
    • Haven't fought a war yet. ~ S 19:22, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
    • CHarmalenge batteling King Kong is super plausible TBH Toby (talk) 19:23, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
    • YES IT IS, sir.         Centriflag.jpeg   I'm going to put you in my ashtray  cause you just got smoked!  19:27, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
    • I vote for Squirrel...erm, sorry, I means Scraw... FirstStooge (talk) 01:13, April 6, 2014 (UTC)


Pita was, before he left (I believe due to a death in the family), one of the most respected users on this wiki, moderator on almost every game he played, editor to DD (what ever happened to that Seoul page? I think someone finished it?)- and that's because he was really productive and an incredible mediator. Pita has returned and looks to be back to stay, and had he not taken his break, I have no doubt of two things; he would be an admin by now, and that record, LG, is mine.         Centriflag.jpeg   I'm going to put you in my ashtray  cause you just got smoked!  19:21, April 5, 2014 (UTC)

  • Supporters
    • Toby (talk) 19:30, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
    • Fully support.