Just so you know, the Mongol Empire shouldn't exits unitl AFTER World War I because according to my history the Central Asian Republic of the pronvices were donimated by Russian, and Chinese ImpearlismAlexanders 01:34, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I'll change it. Flag of South Korea.pngPitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 01:36, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

And also, I don't know how Ontario fits into the picture, regardless though this Korean Article is intrestingAlexanders 01:36, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

It doesn't have anything to do with Russian imperialism. The Mongol Empire could have occurred in the 1200's, and later the imperialism arose. Fed (talk) 01:39, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Yup. My goal for this TL is not to just have as many nations, but as many survivor nations as possible. Flag of South Korea.pngPitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 01:49, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Anyways, what do you guys think of my article? Is it good enough? Flag of South Korea.pngPitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 01:50, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

I think is a good article... but reacting to Fed's comment, were not talking about the 1200's we are talking about World War IAlexanders 02:00, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

If you Read my Central Asian Republic article you will see that Mongolia was under partial Russian DonimationAlexanders 02:02, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Can you write Mughal as the biggest Asian economy? I am asking since it only makes sense, since China is to be divided, and not as powerful. Batmanary 02:42, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Why is China divided? Isn't that a bit cliché? Detectivekenny (Info; Talk) 03:31, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

I think the basic idea is to change everything, and China has been unified for ages. Plus it's huge. Having separate kingdoms works for it. Japan, on the other hand...well...I don't know...Batmanary 03:34, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

There's a lot of ways to make China different other than dividing it, like the clichés. We could have it southern-dominated, or still under the Ming dynasty, or Hindu. Detectivekenny (Info; Talk) 03:49, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

That's why having multiple kingdoms works. A united Hindu China is very unlikely, but a smaller Hindu kingdom of China, and another small Sultanate and a small republic...you can explore all the possibilities, instead of one. Batmanary

We already have Nanzhao and Tibet split off, and I can infer someone will get Xinjiang. I can also infer that China will have Vietnam. That's pretty different already. China's going to still be dynastic, that's something else. The capital could be at say, Zhengzhou. Chinese culture would be much more influenced by the south like Arakan, India, and Champa, rather than Manchu and Mongol culture. That would make a very interesting read rather than the usual Cantonese Country, Hakka Country, Wu Country, etc. Pita has already stated he's interested in a unified China, at any rate. Detectivekenny (Info; Talk) 04:01, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

You put India as the biggest economy in Asia, in your economy tab, but on your introduction thing, it is not on the list. Just to let you know, because then you have two different economic rankings :) Batmanary 02:56, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

It reminds me of my timeline in Dae Han Jeguk: An Alternate History of Korea.

General tiu 15:41, July 13, 2011 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.