No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: Some of this doesn't fit if the data on Slough in the ither UK articles is canon. Also this article mentions High Wycombe as being extant. Based on where certain bunkers were in 1983, I find the survival of High Wycombe unlikely. |
: Some of this doesn't fit if the data on Slough in the ither UK articles is canon. Also this article mentions High Wycombe as being extant. Based on where certain bunkers were in 1983, I find the survival of High Wycombe unlikely. |
||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I added the missing and cannon 100kt nuke over slough. [[User:Katie P Perry|Katie P Perry (talk) ]] ([[User talk:Katie P Perry|talk]]) 01:23, January 11, 2020 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 01:23, 11 January 2020
There was seven blasts in the London metro between 2:02am and 2:11am, and another 3 later on, between 2:22am and 2:36am. Adding them to the earlier two, a total of 12, as the UK page says. Lordganon 05:28, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
Why is this page still a proposal? I am pretty sure that it is all but canon by now. 
Bow To Your Sensei. BOW TO YOUR SENSEI!!!
Large segments still missing, parts not really meshing with other articles. Lordganon (talk) 10:53, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Some of this doesn't fit if the data on Slough in the ither UK articles is canon. Also this article mentions High Wycombe as being extant. Based on where certain bunkers were in 1983, I find the survival of High Wycombe unlikely.
I added the missing and cannon 100kt nuke over slough. Katie P Perry (talk) (talk) 01:23, January 11, 2020 (UTC)