Alternative History

Romania's latest Milestone[]

Just saying, but Britain did help Romania by giving it an, admittantly very small, dreadnaught. Callumthered 04:27, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it may have, but that is one dreadnought. The algorithm only accounts for most available. Since (from what I read) the navy had been improved, that is the most available. (Think about it; a small dreadnought, against a navy.) ChrisL123 19:18, June 5, 2012 (UTC)
Ah, thank you, hadn't realised that's how it worked! Callumthered 21:57, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

Confederation of Latin America[]

Seeing as how Latin America is (according to its players) one nation, shouldn't all of their population be added together and recalculated? Monster Pumpkin 22:52, June 6, 2012 (UTC)

Eh, I could try them both just to see which one works better. I'll do it in the next hour. ChrisL123 23:26, June 6, 2012 (UTC)

Future Milestones?[]

I know it's a bit aways (especially at the speed this Map Game is progressing at), but I have a proposal for future milestones:

  • Aircraft Carrier: +2.5 (Research can begin in 1918.0)
  • Nuclear Weapons: +3 (Research Available from 1937.0, can be completed by 1945 by earliest)
  • More to come if available.


Though unlike other milestones, these should have requirements.

  • Aircraft Carrier: Must have a navy (obviously), and have already got an operable Air Force (like Bombers and Fighters available)
  • Nuclear Weapons: Due to the powers of these weapons, they can only be developed with nations that have a power of 6 or higher. They may be built in weaker countries if they are part of an alliance or pact, with the permission of the leader (who must have a rank of 7), and even then, can only be deployed by that country's approval. Stewdio333 05:37, June 16, 2012 (UTC)


I think once we reach the 1930s, we will have to change this algorithm a bit. The smaller milestones (army, navy, etc.) will have to be lowered in order to make sure the scale doesn't go above 10. But for now, the aircraft carrier will have to be a 2. But I really like your suggestions, thanks for the input. ChrisL123 19:36, June 15, 2012 (UTC)