Talk:Republica de Galicia (1983: Doomsday)

Unification

Couldn't Spain, Galicia and Castilla y León (plus any others that want to) negotiate to unify into one country? It would make for an excellent platform for the eventual recolonization of the interior of Spain. Milarqui, The Spaniard 08:36, April 24, 2012 (UTC)

Post in one spot next time.

Galicia is recognized internally, internationally, and by Spain, as being independent. The very thought of such a thing would be nuts to them. Virtually the same applies for Asturias.

The Confederación Iberica consists of dictatorships and far-right nationalists.

The smaller states are dictatorships.

Castilla y León fights Asturias and Galicia on occasion, and is a union of three dictatorships. Neither of the other two would ever work with them.

And the Republic of Spain would never go along with it.

Lordganon 09:17, April 24, 2012 (UTC)

Why?

I correct several grammar and ortography mistakes, add words so that sentences actually make sense... and you revert all my changes? Why? Milarqui, The Spaniard (talk) 13:04, September 13, 2012 (UTC)

Maybe because you changed content besides the spelling and Grammar? Which is not allowed. Lordganon (talk) 00:17, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for changing a few words so that the sentences actually made some sense. Next time, I'll ask for permission to un-butcher the article, OK?. Milarqui, The Spaniard (talk) 14:23, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

Really? That is what you got out of that?

You changed the names of several things outright.

That is one heck of a lot more than "changing a few words."

Drop the attitude.

Lordganon (talk) 01:32, September 15, 2012 (UTC)

Please...

Allow me to un-butcher this article. Whomever started it did not take enough care to ensure sentences and such were correctly written. Milarqui, The Spaniard (talk) 14:24, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

You will find that, apart from the grammar mistakes and the reorganization of sentences so that they were correct, nothing has been changed. Hope there is a good reason for you to give me if you choose to change it. Milarqui, The Spaniard (talk) 14:56, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

I agree. Most of your changes if not all of them are only grammatiical. Arstar talk 21:49, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

Again, you failed to only change the grammar and structure. But I fixed the problems this time

Arstar, actually look at the changes next time, please.

Lordganon (talk) 01:33, September 15, 2012 (UTC)

I did look at them. And stop being so goddamn condescending. I'm getting sick of you saying I dont read articles and dont do reseach, when in fact I do. Arstar talk 01:57, September 15, 2012 (UTC)

No, you don't tend to - nor did you here. All you do is claim that. Yet every time there's proof you did not. Needs to stop. Lordganon (talk) 03:40, September 15, 2012 (UTC

LG, can you give me one reason why I should continue to work on this tineline? If every incredibly rude remark you make is true, my very presence is damaging to canon and I should be banned from the site. I read the changes and thus I commented. I would have to be a moron to comment on something I didnt read.

If anything needs to stop it is your atrocious superiority complex that has driven away most of the timelines respected editors. At the very least be a little nicer for Gods sake. Arstar talk 04:00, September 15, 2012 (UTC)