So, does the UPA have its own parlement that reports to the one in London or does every province have its own seat in London?
- The UPA parliament used to answer to the one in London, but the arangement by now is not unlike that of Canada *here* (see here, here and here). --Sikulu 13:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Where's New Brunwick?
Why are there both of these for each provinces. Normaly you have only one title used. *Here* canada use "lieutenant-governor" while australia used "governor" but both represent the same type of subnational vice-regal.--Marcpasquin 21:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Governor and deputy-Governor. The UPA isn't Canada, don't forget. --Sikulu 07:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- So I take it they're not vice-regals but rather elected individuals ? --Marcpasquin 13:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Nowadays, yes (though they were apponited before). Think US-style (since the UPA is closer to the USA than any other OTL nation). Now, only the Governor-General is appointed. --Sikulu 14:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe the subnational entities could have a Lord Lieutenant as you had in some part of england *here*. It simply seem odd to me not to have a local representent of the Monarch.--Marcpasquin 19:17, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
If lower Canada kept that name, wouldn't it make more sense to have a "Parti Canadien" ? Its only in the 1960s *here* that we started to use the name "Quebecois", a hundred years after the creation of the Province of Quebec.
- If its because the francophones use a different term to call themselves than "Lower Canadian", you could also have "laurentien" (based on the river that go through the province).--Marcpasquin 19:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, that would be better. Thanks Marc. --Sikulu 07:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
west of mountains
Are people able to go west of the mountains? airiph-althist 04:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
United Provices of America
Did you see Death Race 2000? the name reminds me of that movie. Max117D 23:53, April 23, 2010 (UTC)